Number of Reflexive Relations on a Set Proof

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @yarenkaya7872
    @yarenkaya7872 3 роки тому +10

    I was struggling with understanding that reflexivity is non-conditional. It requires every element in the set has to be in relation to itself. However, transitivity and symmetry include if conditional. If some pairs are in the relation, then some other pairs have to. I just wanted to emphasize this point. It is necessary to understand this video and the number of symmetric relations. Thank you very much for this beneficial video!

  • @poojachawla7585
    @poojachawla7585 3 роки тому +5

    Best explanation yet!!!

  • @junyizheng6432
    @junyizheng6432 2 місяці тому

    This video saved my day

  • @abhisheknayar8357
    @abhisheknayar8357 3 роки тому +1

    Good morning sir aap ne no. Of reflexive relation ko bahut hi Behatar tarike se btaya.

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you ☺️

  • @ayan8233
    @ayan8233 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much sir! I was struggling to make sense of the formula as I missed a key point, confusing myself with identity relation and not reflexive relation

  • @Sargam-sangeet
    @Sargam-sangeet 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks sir for making it easy to understand!

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  2 роки тому +1

      Most welcome!

  • @nibeditasahoo1653
    @nibeditasahoo1653 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much

  • @gauravshukla3552
    @gauravshukla3552 3 роки тому +3

    Excellent way of teaching sir... Well explained 💯

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you.

    • @gauravshukla3552
      @gauravshukla3552 3 роки тому

      @@NumberX sir, number of irreflexive, asymmetric and antisymmetric relations par bhi video bana dijiye

  • @Mathsphysicslovers
    @Mathsphysicslovers 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent job i learned new thing

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  3 роки тому

      Thanks buddy.

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  3 роки тому

      I seen your channel and one of your video, its good for students.

  • @beststatusandmotivation8370
    @beststatusandmotivation8370 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent video

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  2 роки тому +1

      Glad you liked it

  • @MrLDJOSHI
    @MrLDJOSHI 3 роки тому +2

    Nice. Thanks,.

  • @muhammadharis8925
    @muhammadharis8925 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much...I understand

  • @AnviAgrawal-u4p
    @AnviAgrawal-u4p 12 днів тому

    oh my god I GOT IT! thanks

  • @sriramv6798
    @sriramv6798 5 місяців тому +1

    Clear explanation

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  5 місяців тому +1

      Thanks 👍

  • @dilrubayeasmin1967
    @dilrubayeasmin1967 2 роки тому +1

    Thank u sir from the bottom of my heart. After trying to find out the reason of number of reflexive relation on a given set, I have come here to look for some videos about this topic. Now Alhamdulliah at first I've found out ur videos that was one of the best videos. Again want to say thank u🙂

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  2 роки тому +1

      All the best.

  • @poemwithpinki2565
    @poemwithpinki2565 Рік тому

    Good teaching

  • @handxprohowl9133
    @handxprohowl9133 2 роки тому +1

    Sir waht is the ans if set have 4 elem .

  • @suhaneegupta8349
    @suhaneegupta8349 10 місяців тому

    sir reflexive function ka matlab atleast ek (a,a) should exist ya phir that all (a,a) should exist??

    • @airxgaming567
      @airxgaming567 9 місяців тому +1

      EVERY element MUST be mapped with itself

  • @Jimmy00532
    @Jimmy00532 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks sir you cleared my doubt

  • @janhavigupta4231
    @janhavigupta4231 3 роки тому +1

    thankyou veryyy much sir🙏

  • @ravishankariitbhubaneswar8622
    @ravishankariitbhubaneswar8622 4 роки тому +1

    Why only take 2*2*2*....?
    Why not we take 2+2+2.....???

  • @sandeepbhukar474
    @sandeepbhukar474 4 роки тому +1

    What is counting product rule

  • @deepmehta6040
    @deepmehta6040 3 роки тому

    Good explanation

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  3 роки тому

      Thanks for liking

  • @nikitarathorepanwar2464
    @nikitarathorepanwar2464 4 роки тому

    Excellent 👍

  • @coi_vy
    @coi_vy 4 роки тому +2

    Well explained..sir💯

  • @vangalakavitha423
    @vangalakavitha423 4 роки тому

    NumberX say me if (1,2) and (3,5) are present in a set then what should be kept in the realation to make transitive

  • @meow9874
    @meow9874 5 років тому

    hi sir, how is it possible for reflexive relations to be those not in the diagonal?

    • @NumberX
      @NumberX  5 років тому

      Thanks for being in touch with us. All Ordered pair of type (a,a) must lie in the relation defined on set A×A to be reflexive. Hence, we select diagonal ordered pair in one way. Others have two choices; it could be selected or not selected. So, in this process we have accounted diagonal elements also. Hope it will help you.

    • @meow9874
      @meow9874 5 років тому +2

      @@NumberX ah but sorry sir, isnt reflexive relations only type (a,a)? how can (2,1) eg be considered a reflexive relation? therefore i thought the number of reflexive relations of n elements would just be n:3

    • @KKinHD10
      @KKinHD10 4 роки тому +8

      @@meow9874 a relation has to include pairs like a,a b,b c,c for sure.. these are the diagonal pairs. Now if a relation has these 3 but also has any other pair then it doesnt matter as long as all diagonal pairs are in that relation.
      R = (a,a),(b,b),(c,c) is reflexive lets say, then:
      R = (a,a),(b,b),(c,c),(a,c),(b,c) will also be reflexive.
      Diagonals have to be present i.e 1 way and all others can be present or cant be ..so 2 choices for each non diagonal pair..thats why total we include non diagonal choices also.

    • @jiachen8353
      @jiachen8353 4 роки тому

      @@KKinHD10 hey the reason we mins n is that we don't want to double count the diagonal?

    • @KKinHD10
      @KKinHD10 4 роки тому +1

      @@jiachen8353 😂 forgive me but it's been months and I have no idea what Is going on here.

  • @sankalp104
    @sankalp104 2 роки тому +2

    Op

  • @mistyz0ne
    @mistyz0ne 4 роки тому +2

    is this video in english or not

    • @deuteriumtritium9700
      @deuteriumtritium9700 4 роки тому +1

      It's in Hinglish

    • @mistyz0ne
      @mistyz0ne 4 роки тому +1

      @@deuteriumtritium9700 as someone who speaks english and not hindi i felt like i was having a stroke lmaoo

  • @vinay9755
    @vinay9755 4 роки тому

    🙏🙏👌👌👌😊😊

  • @sandeepbhukar474
    @sandeepbhukar474 4 роки тому +1

    Why we take n^2 power of 2

    • @KKinHD10
      @KKinHD10 4 роки тому

      n rows , n columns so n x n total pairs therefore n squared.

  • @ohidaparvin4434
    @ohidaparvin4434 2 роки тому

    Didn't understand

  • @nojoodal-ghamdi5579
    @nojoodal-ghamdi5579 4 роки тому +3

    Why in hindi💔

  • @suryanshanand6668
    @suryanshanand6668 Рік тому +1

    thank you very much