P&C: Number of Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti symmetric, Transitive? & Equivalence relations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • P&C: Number of Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti symmetric, Transitive & Equivalence relations define on AxA
    Link to Number of transitive functions research paper www.emis.de//j...
    Support the channel:
    UPI link: 7906459421@okbizaxis
    UPI Scan code: mathsmerizing....
    PayPal link: paypal.me/mathsmerizing

КОМЕНТАРІ • 62

  • @Mathsmerizing
    @Mathsmerizing  2 роки тому +2

    Support the channel:
    UPI link: 7906459421@okbizaxis
    UPI Scan code: mathsmerizing.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UPI.jpeg
    PayPal link: paypal.me/mathsmerizing

  • @RayyanKhanRayyanKhan
    @RayyanKhanRayyanKhan 10 місяців тому +14

    Clarified everything with num of relations and sets!!! WOWWWWW

  • @sonorousgaming7202
    @sonorousgaming7202 6 місяців тому +3

    sir, i think it should be "total number of relations defined on A" instead of "on AxA".
    If a relation is defined on A, it means
    R: A -> A
    If a relation is defined on AxA, it means
    R: AxA -> AxA
    If a relation is defined from A to B, it means R: A -> B
    If relation is defined on AxB, it means R: AxB -> AxB

    • @SujashSaha
      @SujashSaha 4 місяці тому

      We can call it either "No. of relations on A" or "No. of subsets of AxA"

  • @akiyamamio810
    @akiyamamio810 3 роки тому +15

    One of the best videos I have seen in recent times
    No time pass, no time promo, just straight facts and goated explanation
    Surely gonna share it with everyone

  • @imRJD14
    @imRJD14 3 роки тому +9

    Thanks a lot sir
    I’m in class 12 and It’ll help me a lot in Jee
    You’re really amazing sir

  • @jeril9913
    @jeril9913 4 роки тому +36

    I think this is one of the best online classes for maths

  • @8796205190
    @8796205190 4 роки тому +6

    Sir,
    Anti symmetric relation has come today in CMI Bsc paper, I did it because of you and only you. Exactly same nothing different when you see the paper of CMI 2020 you will realise it. I just copied and pasted there.

    • @Mathsmerizing
      @Mathsmerizing  4 роки тому

      It is good to know that the videos are of some help. All the best and god bless you

  • @Ayush_JEE24
    @Ayush_JEE24 2 роки тому +4

    Very helpful for JEE ASPIRANT.

  • @lakshya664
    @lakshya664 2 роки тому +3

    Sir I think you should not count diagonal elements in the counting of anti symmetric relations... As it converses itself, If (a,a) is present then (a,a) should not present...

    • @farazriyaz9078
      @farazriyaz9078 2 роки тому +2

      I think you're talking about asymmetric relations here. Asymmetric relations do not allow ordered pairs of form (a,a) but antisymmetric relations can have them.

  • @swapnilgadkari4329
    @swapnilgadkari4329 2 місяці тому +1

    very nicely explained

  • @4141rohit
    @4141rohit 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you very much Sir
    I was very much struggling with this topic but now I'm fine in this topic

  • @arghojitsaha3568
    @arghojitsaha3568 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks a lot sir...im a student of 12...jee aspirant 2022

  • @muhammadharis8925
    @muhammadharis8925 3 роки тому +2

    Can anyone answer me that what is the number of relations that are not antisymmetric on a set with n elements?

    • @Mathsmerizing
      @Mathsmerizing  3 роки тому +2

      Use exclusion, from total number of relations exclude the ones which are antisymmetric

  • @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU
    @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU 3 роки тому +3

    Reflexive relation hota kya hAin

    • @Mathsmerizing
      @Mathsmerizing  3 роки тому +1

      pls check byjus.com/maths/reflexive-relation/#:~:text=In%20relation%20and%20functions%2C%20a,R%20%E2%88%80%20a%20%E2%88%88%20A

  • @devanand6766
    @devanand6766 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir 🤩..this video is very helpful for me

  • @edits2846
    @edits2846 3 роки тому +1

    It was very helpful.......Thank you sir....

  • @amrut278
    @amrut278 10 місяців тому

    Dear sir, big fan of your work, i wanted to add in that finding number of equivalence relation can be better memorized using the bell numbers triangle/bell tree rather than the recurrence relation which includes a lot of calculation, if we write 1 in first row and right below it another 1 and 2 next to it, now write 2 below the 1 of second row and add it above and write it next to it as 3, repeat it and get 5 on the rightmost end, now repeat this procedure and we see that the bell numbers are the numbers on the rightmost end - 1,2,5,15,52,203,877, which is clearly being calculated faster (i believe), here's the video link which i learnt this from ua-cam.com/video/dbA2wqlilL4/v-deo.html

  • @chandra7861
    @chandra7861 4 роки тому +2

    Nice explanation sir.

  • @nikola6tesla
    @nikola6tesla 6 місяців тому

    i was struggling till date about this concept. but u made it so easy that i realise coachings are just waste.
    best channnel 4 math - one and only mathsmerizing❤

  • @believer6853
    @believer6853 Рік тому

    Thank you sir for jee mains 2023
    My teacher give me only direct formula......you give me clarity

  • @St_fearless
    @St_fearless 4 місяці тому

    Thank you sir for your excellent explanation.

  • @gargibhadra6465
    @gargibhadra6465 3 роки тому +1

    Really helpful. thank you

  • @s.sacademicandcompetitivec7496

    जय श्री राधेकृष्णा भगवान जी की जय हो!👏🙏👏👏🙏👏

  • @MaheshKumar-yh6zk
    @MaheshKumar-yh6zk Рік тому

    The way of presentation is nice.....
    Thanku ❤

  • @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU
    @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU 3 роки тому +2

    Aap india se ho

  • @tahirmehmood3502
    @tahirmehmood3502 9 місяців тому

    Nice explanation but Bn ki values kahan se li?

  • @badalkr360
    @badalkr360 Рік тому

    Can we write: No. Of anti-symmetric relations = Total No. Of relations - No. Of symmetric relations. ??

  • @vikasgupta8293
    @vikasgupta8293 Рік тому

    Nyc explanation thank you ❤

  • @bhakshishaik4176
    @bhakshishaik4176 Рік тому

    Very good explanation

  • @dineshmathsclasses2514
    @dineshmathsclasses2514 3 роки тому

    Nice explanation of the concept involved, thank you so much for your time and effort.

  • @pervezdar7340
    @pervezdar7340 3 роки тому

    Not a better explanation....
    Its called gotafication

  • @divyamverma2606
    @divyamverma2606 Рік тому

    Awesome!!

  • @agent_op_is_live
    @agent_op_is_live Рік тому

    Antisymmetric definition is wrong

  • @sivag2399
    @sivag2399 Рік тому

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @56pankajkumar78
    @56pankajkumar78 3 роки тому

    Thanks❤ sir

  • @suryanarayanachebolu7870
    @suryanarayanachebolu7870 3 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @mathematicsbyrizwansir
    @mathematicsbyrizwansir 3 роки тому

    Thanks sir

  • @manish50789
    @manish50789 2 роки тому

    Best video dost❤❤❤❤❤

  • @FouITarnished
    @FouITarnished 2 роки тому

    I got this problem but it was negative numbers like this prove {-3,-2,-1,1,2,3} is a transetive
    Can you solve this

    • @kavyasrisspian3074
      @kavyasrisspian3074 2 роки тому

      Can you please say in detail do you need to write it in transitive form or prove this as transitive

  • @avinashsaini789
    @avinashsaini789 3 роки тому

    Relation xRy is antisymmetric if X =y

  • @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU
    @ARYAN_BAJPAI_IIT_BHU 3 роки тому

    U ar god of mathematics

  • @rishularora5515
    @rishularora5515 3 роки тому

    What is bell no.?

    • @Mathsmerizing
      @Mathsmerizing  3 роки тому

      In combinatorial mathematics, the Bell numbers count the possible partitions of a set. Please refer to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_number#:~:text=In%20combinatorial%20mathematics%2C%20the%20Bell,about%20them%20in%20the%201930s.

  • @sonikamehta2916
    @sonikamehta2916 Рік тому

    This video is really helpful..thanku🤍

  • @aakashmeena3805
    @aakashmeena3805 2 роки тому +1

    Finally I got satisfied with this problem of calculating No. Of different types of relations 🙏🙏🙏🙏👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👈👈❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ love you sir