P&C: Number of Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti symmetric, Transitive? & Equivalence relations
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- P&C: Number of Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti symmetric, Transitive & Equivalence relations define on AxA
Link to Number of transitive functions research paper www.emis.de//j...
Support the channel:
UPI link: 7906459421@okbizaxis
UPI Scan code: mathsmerizing....
PayPal link: paypal.me/mathsmerizing
Support the channel:
UPI link: 7906459421@okbizaxis
UPI Scan code: mathsmerizing.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UPI.jpeg
PayPal link: paypal.me/mathsmerizing
Clarified everything with num of relations and sets!!! WOWWWWW
sir, i think it should be "total number of relations defined on A" instead of "on AxA".
If a relation is defined on A, it means
R: A -> A
If a relation is defined on AxA, it means
R: AxA -> AxA
If a relation is defined from A to B, it means R: A -> B
If relation is defined on AxB, it means R: AxB -> AxB
We can call it either "No. of relations on A" or "No. of subsets of AxA"
One of the best videos I have seen in recent times
No time pass, no time promo, just straight facts and goated explanation
Surely gonna share it with everyone
Thanks a lot sir
I’m in class 12 and It’ll help me a lot in Jee
You’re really amazing sir
I think this is one of the best online classes for maths
Thank you so much
@@Mathsmerizing lo à
Agree
Sure
Sir,
Anti symmetric relation has come today in CMI Bsc paper, I did it because of you and only you. Exactly same nothing different when you see the paper of CMI 2020 you will realise it. I just copied and pasted there.
It is good to know that the videos are of some help. All the best and god bless you
Very helpful for JEE ASPIRANT.
Sir I think you should not count diagonal elements in the counting of anti symmetric relations... As it converses itself, If (a,a) is present then (a,a) should not present...
I think you're talking about asymmetric relations here. Asymmetric relations do not allow ordered pairs of form (a,a) but antisymmetric relations can have them.
very nicely explained
Thank you very much Sir
I was very much struggling with this topic but now I'm fine in this topic
Thanks a lot sir...im a student of 12...jee aspirant 2022
Can anyone answer me that what is the number of relations that are not antisymmetric on a set with n elements?
Use exclusion, from total number of relations exclude the ones which are antisymmetric
Reflexive relation hota kya hAin
pls check byjus.com/maths/reflexive-relation/#:~:text=In%20relation%20and%20functions%2C%20a,R%20%E2%88%80%20a%20%E2%88%88%20A
Thank you sir 🤩..this video is very helpful for me
It was very helpful.......Thank you sir....
Dear sir, big fan of your work, i wanted to add in that finding number of equivalence relation can be better memorized using the bell numbers triangle/bell tree rather than the recurrence relation which includes a lot of calculation, if we write 1 in first row and right below it another 1 and 2 next to it, now write 2 below the 1 of second row and add it above and write it next to it as 3, repeat it and get 5 on the rightmost end, now repeat this procedure and we see that the bell numbers are the numbers on the rightmost end - 1,2,5,15,52,203,877, which is clearly being calculated faster (i believe), here's the video link which i learnt this from ua-cam.com/video/dbA2wqlilL4/v-deo.html
Nice explanation sir.
Thank you Chandra
i was struggling till date about this concept. but u made it so easy that i realise coachings are just waste.
best channnel 4 math - one and only mathsmerizing❤
Thank you sir for jee mains 2023
My teacher give me only direct formula......you give me clarity
Thank you sir for your excellent explanation.
Really helpful. thank you
जय श्री राधेकृष्णा भगवान जी की जय हो!👏🙏👏👏🙏👏
The way of presentation is nice.....
Thanku ❤
Aap india se ho
Yes
Thanks
Nice explanation but Bn ki values kahan se li?
Can we write: No. Of anti-symmetric relations = Total No. Of relations - No. Of symmetric relations. ??
Yes
Nyc explanation thank you ❤
Very good explanation
Nice explanation of the concept involved, thank you so much for your time and effort.
Not a better explanation....
Its called gotafication
Awesome!!
Antisymmetric definition is wrong
How come?
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thanks❤ sir
Excellent
Thanks sir
Best video dost❤❤❤❤❤
I got this problem but it was negative numbers like this prove {-3,-2,-1,1,2,3} is a transetive
Can you solve this
Can you please say in detail do you need to write it in transitive form or prove this as transitive
Relation xRy is antisymmetric if X =y
U ar god of mathematics
Thank you, but I perfer to disagree
@@Mathsmerizing this is your nobility sir.
What is bell no.?
In combinatorial mathematics, the Bell numbers count the possible partitions of a set. Please refer to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_number#:~:text=In%20combinatorial%20mathematics%2C%20the%20Bell,about%20them%20in%20the%201930s.
This video is really helpful..thanku🤍
Finally I got satisfied with this problem of calculating No. Of different types of relations 🙏🙏🙏🙏👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👈👈❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ love you sir