'Columbo Goes to the Guillotine' in 12 Minutes | Recap - S08 EP01 | Columbo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2022
  • Lt. Columbo delves into the world of magic as he investigates the death of a magician, and there appears to be a tie to a prodigal psychic supported by a government-founded institute on parapsychology.
    Stream Columbo now on Peacock: pck.tv/3oBPwpJ
    Season 8, Episode 1 "Columbo Goes to the Guillotine".
    Your favorite shows, movies and more are here. Stream now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com
    He's the greatest detective of all time, and he finally has his own official channel! Follow us for the clips and compilations of the most iconic murders and moments from the classic series.
    Just one more thing... Don't forget to subscribe: / @columbo
    and watch the full episodes on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/au/tv-season...
    #Columbo #PeterFalk
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 101

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams Рік тому +35

    6:10 "Are you intimating that Max Dyson was murdered?" "Oh no, sir, I'm saying it straight out." I love that exchange.

  • @JM-rm3lt
    @JM-rm3lt Рік тому +29

    I recall watching this episode with my dear grandfather in 1990. I have loved Columbo ever since.

  • @rosario508
    @rosario508 Рік тому +75

    I’m glad this episode is getting some recognition on this channel. It’s definitely one of the better episodes of the 90s (I know- that’s not really saying much)

    • @kev3d
      @kev3d Рік тому +5

      Yes, I liked this one. Parallels "Now You See Him" in some respects, but it's different enough to be interesting.

    • @lisawilliams2013
      @lisawilliams2013 Рік тому +5

      The writing and acting was solid, something that wasn’t consistent in the later episodes.

    • @Drummerchick2003
      @Drummerchick2003 Рік тому +5

      Hey can we just give credit that this show was on from the 60s to 2003, that blows my mind. Also we gotta realize Hollywood goes through trends with what they show us; for example, we went through the trend of reality TV, just think about that for a minute.

    • @rosario508
      @rosario508 Рік тому +2

      @@Drummerchick2003 I suppose that’s a fair point but the shows from the 70s set such a high bar it’s hard not to acknowledge the drop in quality

    • @iluvdissheet
      @iluvdissheet Рік тому +1

      Your comment is everything!
      Yes one of the better ones but also not like the originals.
      Idc what anyone says about this show/episode, what cannot and will not be challenged is how absolutely genius Peter Faulk is....."As you wish" 😍

  • @voidcadet
    @voidcadet Рік тому +54

    This was the second (and final) time we see the lieutenant fire a gun, the first being
    in "Playback" (1975) where he fired into a box of sand as part of an experiment.

    • @nevientadross8129
      @nevientadross8129 Рік тому +1

      I think he fired it in a mattress in troubled waters

    • @voidcadet
      @voidcadet Рік тому +4

      @@nevientadross8129 Great episode! I had to double check, but Columbo asks
      the murderer to shoot the mattress for him, saying "I hate guns. Besides,
      I'm a bad shot. I'm liable to miss."

    • @Ken_Scaletta
      @Ken_Scaletta Рік тому +3

      @@voidcadet Which means he's probably actually a crack shot.

    • @Swindle1984
      @Swindle1984 Рік тому +2

      @@Ken_Scaletta Columbo, like Falk, canonically has a glass eye. Having one eye, and thus no depth perception and a large blind area, means he cannot accurately or safely fire a gun, particularly at a moving target. He also has stated that he almost never carries a gun on him. His department likely doesn't allow him to carry a gun because if he used it, he'd be a liability and possibly hit something he didn't intend to. He also very rarely needs a gun, as he nearly always has a patrol officer with him to make the arrest (though in cases where he knows the suspect won't resist or try to flee, he takes them in himself, such as in Any Old Port in a Storm), and this is one of two, perhaps three, instances in all of Columbo where the suspect tries to kill him. And every time, he saw it coming and prepared beforehand.

    • @vanoscrap6296
      @vanoscrap6296 6 місяців тому

      @@Swindle1984 a lot of people shoot guns with the non dominant eye closed

  • @MrMyers758
    @MrMyers758 Рік тому +36

    Blake would have had to make a run for it after killing Columbo because there’d be no way of him getting away with that, but if he kept him alive he could have either hoped for the best or done a runner after Columbo left, and having more time. Columbo is incredibly lucky the killer didn’t take the safer and most sensible option of putting it on stately

    • @stonecoldeli79
      @stonecoldeli79 Рік тому

      But columbo switched the labels to make sure it was safe, are you saying there's a way to bypass the safety?

    • @MrMyers758
      @MrMyers758 Рік тому +12

      @@stonecoldeli79 The implication with this scene is that Blake intended to kill him, so Blake didn't use what he thought was the safety to before bringing the blade down. If he in fact decided to NOT kill Columbo (which as I was saying was the far more likely and logical option when considering the characters in context) he would have put the safety on, unknowingly turning the safety off, resulting in Columbo's death. I'm just saying he took a massive unnecessary risk in getting his head chopped off if the killer had decided to play the long game.

    • @stonecoldeli79
      @stonecoldeli79 Рік тому +1

      Yeah I wouldn't have done that.

    • @fredocarroll
      @fredocarroll Рік тому +13

      @@MrMyers758 However, when the collar is fitted, you can see Columbo looking in turn up at both ends of it. My guess is this:
      1. He made a mark that he could see from the execution position.
      2. If Blake loaded it to kill, he'd allow things to run their course (as he did), since he'd reversed the settings.
      3. If Columbo saw that it was lined up for "SAFE," and thus actually putting him in danger, he would have spoken up and said, "Just one more thing, sir, we have a little problem to fix first." He could do that, knowing that Blake wasn't trying to hurt him.
      That's my theory. It's still a non-zero risk, but not as big as a risk as it might seem at first blush.

  • @Weird-City
    @Weird-City Рік тому +23

    Columbo took a massive gamble there :) - to be honest he probably made both sides safe.

    • @artmallory970
      @artmallory970 Рік тому +5

      For sure, he was relying the Blake trying to kill him...

  • @basquat76
    @basquat76 Рік тому +13

    Seems like an awfully bold move by Columbo to switch the labels. I mean if the guy hadn't tried to kill him and killing a cop is not something you get away with he would have actually died.

  • @dnasty312
    @dnasty312 Рік тому +13

    In 1989 alone, Anthony Zerbe had *three* extreme deaths:
    -Shot and went out a high window
    -Guillotine
    -Head blown up

    • @bonghunezhou5051
      @bonghunezhou5051 Рік тому +3

      In what film was the first one?

    • @dnasty312
      @dnasty312 Рік тому +4

      @@bonghunezhou5051 _See No Evil, Hear No Evil._ An underrated comedy starring Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder

  • @rabbiswhy
    @rabbiswhy Рік тому +6

    All it takes is one Columbo clip, and im on a Columbo binge

  • @smileysatanson3404
    @smileysatanson3404 Рік тому +25

    columbo's best magic trick is to make the day go by quickly, love this show as much as i love poirot

  • @evanflowforever6615
    @evanflowforever6615 Рік тому +6

    Columbo was the ultimate master of human psychology

  • @mmmoroi
    @mmmoroi 9 місяців тому +1

    Columbo literally ran the risk of losing his own life in this case. An exemplary commitment to his job.

  • @toshibavoodoo
    @toshibavoodoo Рік тому +8

    NO WAY!! I have never seen this episode, got to watch and come back and then see your review.

  • @susanwest8239
    @susanwest8239 Рік тому +12

    I love this show and all the rest. Columbo is fantastic.

  • @MrSamuelArthurRobertAllen
    @MrSamuelArthurRobertAllen Рік тому +9

    Great episode between these two.

  • @msfierce2008
    @msfierce2008 Рік тому +10

    How could I have missed this one - excellent episode!

  • @christopherkraft1327
    @christopherkraft1327 Рік тому +8

    What a great episode!!! Then again, Columbo is a great series!!! 🎄🤶⛄

  • @matthewmattson7584
    @matthewmattson7584 Рік тому +1

    One of my all time favorites

  • @alegriabenshitrit4646
    @alegriabenshitrit4646 Рік тому +2

    l Love this episode 👍

  • @sysyviv7872
    @sysyviv7872 Рік тому +3

    I like this episode. 👍👍👍

  • @MidnightSnack
    @MidnightSnack Рік тому +2

    Who else came here after this was referenced in “The World’s Greatest Con”?

  • @mikesanders8621
    @mikesanders8621 Рік тому +1

    I clapped when I saw Sopranos!

  • @maurogozzo139
    @maurogozzo139 Рік тому

    Adoro tutte le puntate❤️❤️🤗😘🐬

  • @Nathan_H1gg3rz
    @Nathan_H1gg3rz Рік тому +5

    So the guy commits murder and only receives a gag pistol as punishment? Doesn't seem fair...

    • @Deadbuck73
      @Deadbuck73 Рік тому

      True back in the 90’s… nowadays dude probably is the victim and he’ll be out in time for dinner.

  • @davidmarshall5596
    @davidmarshall5596 Рік тому +3

    Another excellent episode with the Lieutenant on top form 👏 👌 excellent thanks for posting 👍

  • @jineanelabate4497
    @jineanelabate4497 Рік тому +1

    He is so old that I didn't think he was acting anymore.

  • @sjacrane
    @sjacrane 11 місяців тому +2

    So he reversed the labels. What if the villain decided to put it on the safe way? He seemed to show balls and to back down from accusing him and even show him some respect by putting his trust in him as a magician which could’ve caused him to do so. Whatever the case Colombo had some real balls in that situation. His wincing face as the blade came down suggested he risked his life big time in order to nail him.

  • @NotJames1
    @NotJames1 Рік тому +7

    Columbo doesn't carry guns, he actively avoids them. He would have had someone listening nearby to do the actual gun holding. The writers messed up with that

  • @GrisouIII
    @GrisouIII Рік тому +2

    I’ve had a crush on Anthony Andrews ever since I saw him in the 1982 tv movie « The Scarlet Pimpernell ». I was 11 yrs old ❤

  • @Deadbuck73
    @Deadbuck73 Рік тому +3

    Don’t think I’ve seen this one. How’d I miss it?

  • @BeastNationXIV
    @BeastNationXIV 10 місяців тому

    12:36
    The moment when you know Stone Cold Steve Austin watched this episode as a kid.

  • @HeyCupertino
    @HeyCupertino Рік тому +3

    No real exposure to Columbo apart from vague cultural awareness.
    Theses clips have been a brilliant little insight into an inspired production by all parties.

  • @kimberlyjfurey4699
    @kimberlyjfurey4699 5 місяців тому

    You'd make a bizarre executioner. You'd ask the condemned man if he agreed with the rope."

  • @TheStevenWhiting
    @TheStevenWhiting Рік тому +2

    Watch the kid in the magic shop as he gives away his trick buy showing all the cards are the same. "practice" you haven't been doing it much then as you revealed all the cards when you did the poor cut.

  • @evaoslik
    @evaoslik Рік тому

    Love Columbo......but this was really crazy......as much as I enjoyed watching it because it's exciting...it was somply too much risk.....crazy....

  • @philipusher4282
    @philipusher4282 Рік тому +7

    The guillotine was the most important piece of evidence in the case. How come they just left it in the magic shop and didn't remove it to preserve the evidence?

  • @MarcosRodriguez-yh7zv
    @MarcosRodriguez-yh7zv 7 місяців тому

    this actor reminds me of Bryan Kohberger attitude ; 2022 university of Idaho murders

  • @loiseaudelamort7238
    @loiseaudelamort7238 10 місяців тому

    12:30 when Columbo becomes the murderer

  • @angelnavarro553
    @angelnavarro553 Рік тому +4

    HOLY COW HE PULLED OUT A GUN??? HE HATES THOSE, HE REALLY WANTED THIS GUY GONE
    *edit nevermind i watched 2 more seconds

  • @georges3799
    @georges3799 Рік тому

    I wonder if tthe Amazing Randy enjoyed this episode.

  • @wendelorian
    @wendelorian 11 місяців тому

    😅the best

  • @tazchanday2422
    @tazchanday2422 Рік тому

    Nice one

  • @wayneyadams
    @wayneyadams Рік тому

    4:20 They do the blood dripping through the ceiling gimmick all over the place in crime shows and it is absolute BS.

  • @matthiasplatz5919
    @matthiasplatz5919 Рік тому

    So...assuming that Blake had gotten away with the murder, what exactly was his endgame? Taking his new government position would have eventually outed him as a fraud anyhow!

  • @venitastrong1728
    @venitastrong1728 Рік тому +1

    This my show

  • @mymusic3354
    @mymusic3354 Рік тому

    The guy looks like Jim Carrey's identical twin....even the facial expressions, the hair etc.... interesting....

  • @kevino4372
    @kevino4372 Місяць тому

    Can i ask how the ending gives columbo proof?? There were no witnesses or anything. Guy could have just denyed it. Afterall, it was columbo who fkked about with the labels

  • @friedrice7
    @friedrice7 Рік тому +4

    2nd time Columbo used a gun

  • @master-kq3nw
    @master-kq3nw Рік тому +3

    First episode columbo after 1978

  • @WinrichNaujoks
    @WinrichNaujoks Рік тому

    Good luck proving this in court.

  • @misterskarbero5374
    @misterskarbero5374 Рік тому +3

    why is columbo getting wicked head in thumbnail

  • @bee1978
    @bee1978 Рік тому +1

    🤣🤣 appalling gotcha.

  • @josephineclay235
    @josephineclay235 Рік тому

    Sorry

  • @jeffskillman9275
    @jeffskillman9275 Рік тому +4

    Great episode but there is absolutely no way that Columbo would take the risk of getting himself killed just to get that last piece of evidence. If the killer had chosen the ‘Safe’ side to be smart and play it straight as Columbo’s evidence was by his own admission weak, Columbo would have died and it probably would have been classed as an accident given the label switch. If he chose ‘Danger’ as in the episode where are the witnesses to corroborate the guillotine was used? It would have been Columbo’s word versus the killer’s and the last piece of evidence would have been circumstantial. Daft ending as completely unrealistic.

  • @mikec6347
    @mikec6347 Рік тому +3

    That ending is just so tacky. The 70s episodes weren’t so cheesy.

    • @shelbyherring92
      @shelbyherring92 Рік тому +1

      Bruh, you apparently forgot how hammy some of the 70s episodes were... Janet Leigh's episode in particular...

  • @kev3d
    @kev3d Рік тому +5

    Does anyone else feel the writers intended to suggest that the killer and the victim had a sexual relationship in the Ugandan prison?
    As the victim says: "Try to remember what we meant to each other in that place, and what we gave each other ..."
    That doesn't necessarily mean a sexual relationship between the two but it doesn't sound like the kind of language run-of-the-mill prison inmates use either. In other words it seems, to me, that they were more than friends in the slammer.
    But what do you think?

    • @aspatzle827
      @aspatzle827 Рік тому +1

      I got the same vibe watching this video, but I haven't seen the full episode yet.

    • @somebodycooliguess1597
      @somebodycooliguess1597 Рік тому +4

      Oh I spotted the queercoding immediately! The flirtatious rival tones of voice. And it would make sense for the story, too. If they had been more than mentor and pupil in prison, then that would make the mentor's betrayal even more painful

    • @artmallory970
      @artmallory970 Рік тому

      Certainly sounded like it. Funnily enough, the actor who played 'Blake' (Anthony Andrews) was in a British series with Jeremy Irons where they were a pair of Horse's Hoofs...

  • @rickrick5041
    @rickrick5041 Рік тому

    There is a more longahand version but here is the shorter one updated, rechecked, re-researched, redone, refurbished, renewed, renovated and a bit new on top of it:
    The mondo Columbus episodes are too short. The old 1950s non not guilty Von Rittenhouser mondo captious Chawin himself found guilty of 6 counts of racism TVs couldn't hold longer ones. Chowin was convicted of 6 counts of racism and accepted our sins for us. They used old CRT Catholic Ray Tubes. They used to use Central Vacuum Theory with CRT or Catholic Ray Tub technology and Motorola involvement with flypaper control to try to make a non racist product
    They didn’t have Claw Technology. No harm no fowl. The proof is in the pudding.

  • @johnsimpson8043
    @johnsimpson8043 Рік тому +2

    One of if not the stupidest ending ever.

    • @Weird-City
      @Weird-City Рік тому +3

      Have to agree on a logical standpoint - but it did fit the tone of the episode.

    • @johnsimpson8043
      @johnsimpson8043 Рік тому

      Well, if the bad guy didn't try to kill Columbo then his head would be sliced off. And that was based on the idea that Columbo wouldn't have his name in his files nor tell anyone where he was going.

  • @davidjunker2772
    @davidjunker2772 Рік тому

    If you put the guillotine collar on the “danger” way, it works the way it’s supposed to. The blade comes all the way down, through the collar and whatever is inside.
    If you put the collar on the “safe” way, the blade stops inside of the top half of the collar and a second blade inside of the bottom half drops down.
    A very good and very dangerous trick.
    🪄