You don’t need to use the power adapter or an AC power connection at all to use ADMS-10 or CHIRP. This is despite what Yaesu say and despite other videos to the contrary, including this one. 1. Turn radio on and plug in USB cable. 2. Remove battery. 3. Hold down AMS button on keypad and reconnect battery. You are now in programming mode. No AC required. No $25 cable required.
Yep, I had no issue programming mine just following the instructions. Didn’t take long at all and IIRC the Yaesu software even downloaded the frequencies from Radio Reference for me.
Great & Honest Review. I have two FT-70's and like them quite a lot! I totally agree with you and others on the volume control issue as it is a pain but other than that it's definitely my favorite radio. I work many events with my local club and choose it over my other radios every time. I haven't had any battery issues but do keep a spare with me. It's so easy to program from the keypad that I've never tried computer programming, although yours and other reviews have revealed what a nightmare it is. Digital with the 70 is super easy and we have several fusion repeaters in the area. So for my usage, I'll always choose the 70 over my 4x or the Anytone 878. Thanks again for another great video!
As a new HAM Tech and not knowing shyte I was strongly encouraged to go with the Yaesu ft-70D as my first radio. Although pressing the volume button while turning the top dial was unorthodox it hasn’t bothered me. You made your point. I am pretty sure you could have done it just as persuasively in less than 1 or 2 minutes? You are obviously an expert and likely have thousands of hours of experience dating back to your AF service. That adds weight to your opinion. But I can’t believe I just spent 25 minutes waiting to hear “how the radio was ruined by bad ideas” only to finally learn that your biggest complaint was adjusting the volume? You made a better case for the unusual programming sequence. You could have stated your credentials and named both problems in less than 3 minutes. Maybe I am in the wrong hobby?
I am a newly licensed Ham. December 2021 I received my callsign. I went to the Dayton Hamvention in May of this year, and I hadn't done a lot of research in handhelds, but I had heard that Baofeng and cheap Chinese radios didn't preform as well as the Yaesu, Icom or Kenwood radios. I picked up a my first Yaesu handheld (and maybe my last) the FT-70D at the Hamvention, and wish that I had done more research on the product before picking it up. The battery life is terrible, and it doesn't come with a drop-in charger at all. I get about 6 and a half hours of receive-only life on the battery before it goes on to life support. Very disappointing. My cheap Baofeng radio gets about 18 hours of standby time, but a Yaesu FT-70D radio that costs the equivalent of 6 Baofengs only lasts 1/3rd the time. The $25 Baofeng comes with a drop-in charger too... I get good signal transmit and receive quality on the unit, but it's tough to talk on the air when the battery is always reporting that it is getting low...
I agree with your findings. Yaesu lacks consistency amongst their products. The nice thing about Icom handhelds (ID-31, 51 and 52) is they use the same battery which there are three capacities to choose from. All 3 Icom radios use the same drop in charger as well. All 3 radios function the same way. If you know how to use one, you know how to use all three plus the ID-4100 and 5100. Lastly, when using D-star, distance to other station is shown the same way amongst all the newer Icom D-star radios. The FTM-400 is the only radio the shows distance information in DN mode on the main screen. All the other Fusion radios require button pushing to see distance information.
So I see it as Yaesu, being in the business of selling radios, makes various high quality models with years of solid performance. Making radios with different features allows them to cater to more individual preferences. They might… as I did… buy an FT60 and an FT70. Every good manufacturer has a good, better, best option. I also HIGHLY doubt Yaesu didn’t field test, panel test etc. this radio. The reality is some probably really like the fact that the volume needs to be intentionally adjusted. Just as easy as it is to turn the volume up, it can unintentionally be turned down as well. I will agree it would have been nice to have the option to have it be changed in settings like others. I think going to one knob was being viewed as simplifying things visually and not look more complicated than it needs to be. Also… HAM radio is unfortunately, let’s be honest, a dying form of communication and many that are becoming HAMS are just getting them for emergency use, prepping etc. Just my thoughts here. Thanks for the video.
Thanks so much for all the info, Scott. That volume control is definitely a dealbreaker for me. I just bought the VX-6R and love it, even with the primitive screen. I'm not too fussed on YSF as I have a DMR radio and have not set it up yet, maybe later someday. Cheers 73
I like my VX-6. It is the 21 century. To put in a freq there should be arrows to go up and down to put in offset, -+. tone, etc. without digging into menus. Just one rolling screen that does it all. All yaesu radios should do fusion to promote the platform.
Great review. At one point, I was considering this radio for outdoor use (Jeeping and caving) but, your FT-60 review swayed me. The VX6 is a possibility. But, cost is a definite factor. I have an FT3D and I really like it. but, I'm afraid I might break it, so it stays home most of the time. I do agree that Yeasu is lacking consistency in the design department. Hopefully they will take note of your reviews. Good job and thank you for the information.
Spot on review!! The battery that just came with mine is horrible! Connect thru my PDN to Wires X, make a contact or two and half the battery is gone!!! I ordered an extra battery with the radio and the extra battery I got was for the FT3! AND the RT systems software and cable makes the programming like normal radios. Will never do the Yaesu abortion procedure to program the darn radio!
The Yaesu FT-60 is based off the commercial Vertex VX-400 series chassis. A 25 year old COMMERCIAL portable. The FT-70 is based off the VX-8 VX-7 VX-6 chassis. A 20 year old hammy design. The reason the 60 is a better radio is because it was based off a commercial radio from day one when Yaesu and Vertex Standard were still under one umbrella. The 70 is a fine radio, but it's 100% hammy whereas the 60 has SOME commercial linage. This is evident by the myriad of accessories. High capacity batteries being the biggest. mAh is mAh regardless of type. The 70 on the other hand, was designed well after Yaesu and Vertex Standard parted & the overall implementation shows. Specifications on both radios are well published. WELL PUBLISHED. Anyone that purchases either of the two without reviewing the published specifications, be it RX capability or anything else gets exactly what they deserve. The 70 was NEVER meant to be a replacement for the 60. That was the role of the 65. Yaesu knew they failed well before the initial release of the 65, thus the reason the 60 is still available to this day.
I have to disagree that is was meant to be an upgrade to the ft-60, it's A downgraded FT-1xdr. I have the ft-1 and the menus are much the same including the volume control. But there is a setting in the menu to allow you to just tap the volume button, then you can adjust it with out holding it down.
Agree on the volume control issue, why there isn't an option in the menu to make the knob volume is beyond me. I would also like to see an extended battery similar to the FT-65 as well.
I realize this video is a few years old. I just got an FT-70D and I use RT systems for programming. You don't have to take off the battery to program with RTS. You can link memory banks, any number of them so if you have the need for a bank with greater than 100 memory slots just put the rest in a 2nd bank and link them.
That is correct. You can accomplish all of those things and don't need to do the weird battery thing with the RTS CPS. But not with the factory CPS. So, if you want your FT-70D to be fully functional it requires purchasing RTS for an additional $50. Thus, the actual cost of the radio is $220 for it to be fully functional. Which is exactly what I did because I wanted banks. Having to do that didn't sit well with me and only added to my irritation. I have never encountered another radio that requires you do that. They are all fully programmable with their existing factory CPS.
Another no B.S. review. I love my FT-60 and was thinking about picking up the FT-70 to have another radio that I could communicate to with Fusion from my FT-3D if I gave the FT-70 to another ham. I have seen some of the negatives of the FT-70 in reviews. Your video really pointed out the flaws in the FT-70. If someone gets butthurt about the review, all I can tell them is you were honest and fair. As to the volume control on the FT-3D, look at page 83 in the manual. You can swap knob functions between channel and volume with an easy change in the menu. I may still buy a FT-70 just for point to point comms with another ham and not try to use the FT-70 like I would the FT-60. Thanks Scott. At least I now know what I'm getting myself into.
Don't be put off; the ft70d is a great radio, the drama queen is being picky! If you used the radio in a car there would be a problem in changing the volume, now programming on a pc is annoying! And don't forget when there's no one on 2m/70cm yon have digital where you talk around the world.
I own two. Agree with volume. But what I hate most is that it drains the battery when OFF!!! Only way to store the HT is plugged in. I like that it charges on anything between like 6v-16v and I made powerpole pigtails for them so it's easy. What I love most is it's the cheapest way to Fusion. This radio and a hotspot is $140 cheaper than the FT-5DR alone.
Batteries America sells a 2200mah battery for the FT-70. Organizing the channels into banks is rather easy actually. The boxes to the far right of the screen (you'll need to scroll to see) are simply ticked as the user desires - thus putting the channel into a bank(s). The banks can be named under the settings tab.
Yes, please explain how to scan those banks! Say I have channels in Banks 1, 7 9 and 17 I want to scan - how is that accomplished? Very simple on my Icom 2730!
@@cmerton I am not aware of a way to "scan between banks". However, one can create a separate bank with the channels from 1, 7, 9, and 17 and scan between those channels within that specific bank. Channels can exist in more than one bank. Hope that helps - K4QEP
I have had this radio 2 years. Programming ADMS software sucks. I managed ... using the software, to get the radio to the point you can't do a factory reset. I recently programmed a few Boufengs for friends with Chirp. What a delight. What esse.
Same. Volume issue with the VX-8R, I sold it. The FT70 would be my EDC except for the battery and volume issues. VX-6 is my EDC and works great for that.
Thank you for this excellent and honest review. I was very close to buying this radio, but I think the volume control would drive me crazy. I adjust volume all the time and for the same reasons you mentioned. You saved me a lot of frustration. I guess the search continues. Thanks again!
The programming sequence is crazy . The guy who came up with that must have been drunk or a plant from Icom. He forgot to add stand on one foot while programming. You must miss the Motorola you used in the military and security this hammy stuff is just cheap tatt.
Another rock- solid review, looking forward to a review on the Anytone AT-D878UVII Plus as well as more on the Yaesu VX-6. A newbie here getting ready to take my technician exam. Great channel tons of good info here keep up the great content!
The Yaesu VX-6r is a solid radio and has been around for a very long time. One of the best Yaesu ever made and I really with they’d make more radios in the VX line and even bring back the VX-5r, VX-7r and VX-8r.
Wish I had seen this before I bought it! I have been finding it awkward, but it’s my first real miniature HT, so I didn’t know better. I had a technician license way back in the 90s and an old RadioShack 202. Got back in the ham radio this year and started with a HF rig. I spent a while contemplating which HT to get and finally settled on this one. It seemed nice. I do love all of its capabilities, but did find the volume control awkward. I thought it was just me not being used to it.
It's too bad that the FT-70D fell short as a successor. I personal love the FT-60R for a few reasons. 1) Very simple to program; 2) Independent physical volume and squelch knob; 3) Inexpensive batteries with good runtime. In terms of negatives for the FT-60R, I have a problem with: 1) No direct DC charging (I have an older model from 2011 that supports direct charging); 2) The 3.5mm jack easily backs out and will engage the PTT (a rubber band should not be required); 3) No stated IP rating. I am very hard on my gear and finally destroyed my FT-60R with sweat and salt after two years of trail running. I have three more FT-60's in my fleet, but I am seriously trying to transition to the VX-6R for the IP67 rating. The VX-6 has it's own issues--namely, more difficult to program from the front panel and very low power output when using the AA battery tray. I look forward to hearing more about the VX-6R on your channel. I will be doing a comparison on my channel as I transition from the FT-60R to the VX-6R for EDC. As I finish this, I realized that this comment had very little to do with the FT-70D. Based on your video, it's clear that the 70 is not for me. Thank you. 73 de KT1RUN.
Ive had my 70 for a few years. I leave my volume on 12-14 and use the lapel mic. If it is too quite, I listen closer. If it is too loud, I cup my hand over the mic to quite it. Playing with volumes is not a good idea, and a bad practice. Keep it loud, and just cup the speaker if needed. Now, the idea of changing the side button to channel, now that is a fantastic idea.
Yeah that would be a big problem for me too. I am glad I watched your video because I was genuinely thinking about making that radio my first digital radio. Thank you.
After seeing this review; I'm thankful I found it before I spent my money. I would have been furious about the same things you've identified. I guess I'm still shopping. Thanks for the assist.
It's odd about the FT-70. Lousy battery that goes flat even if switched off. It's been out a few years now, yet no new replacement for it has been forthcoming. Odd for a company which seems to bring out new models every five minutes!! A cradle charger for this can be bought from eBay.
I have 2 FT-70's. I am fairly happy with them. They do C4FM which I use a lot and they make great around the house radio's. The batteries at least for me seem adequate. However you hit the nail on the head with both the programming issue and especially the volume control issue that I noticed the first time I wore it in a pouch at a ham feast. I even experienced the recliner upgrade like you. When I wear this one out, it's back to fully manual.
Me too. Two FT-70's and a slow powered recliner (tonight power went out and I had to climb out of it.) It's back to manual when this one breaks. I don't like the volume control on the radio, but for me it's that the batteries drain when they are off. That's the biggest drawback. But I got Fusion on the cheap!
Another issue with the 70 is the mismatch in TX audio levels between analog and C4FM. A mic gain setting of 7 or 8 is perfect for analog, and 1 or 2 sounds good on Yaesu System Fusion.
This is interesting and also my major complaint about amateur radio. Some operators sound fine, but so many have audio levels so low I wonder how anyone can hear them. Thus, the need to constantly rotate a volume knob. For FM, WHY don't they put auto-level controls in mike audio circuits? Seems to me the radio should be designed to maintain a specific transmit modulation level whether you're whispering or shouting.
I had absolutely no issue programming mine with the free software from Yaesu. I just booted the radio into programming mode per the instructions and it worked fine.
Great review. Can you also suggest how the Anytone 878UV compares to the Yaesu FT70 when it comes to analog Rx/Tx quality? Given that Anytone is not superheterodyne, is the Yeasu significantly better? Thanks!
Cheers for the vid. I'd been considering 70D as a small, lightweight portable for use in my car... but 2-hand volume operation is an absolute, 100% no-go!
I have the 60 and the 70. I heard the 60 doesn't charge straight from cable anymore that's why they uncle the drop in charger. Haven't tried it though. To me they are both back up radios. I have the ft3d and the ft5d.
Wow... never really knew this about the FT70D... knowing this, I can see the major design flaw. It would be a deal breaker for me too if I were considering this HT.
Very well thought out and presented video! Something tells me some people at Yaesu will be listening to this one carefully. But sales on the FT 60 probably increased a bit too so there you go.
THIS is the kind of review that I look for!! excellent USER review. Another thing they could have done is to make the VOLUME button stick or be a toggle so you could leave it in volume mode until you need to change the channel. Yaesu has lost their way on most of their radio designs. The newer mobile radios do NOT have channel banks at all! They stopped doing one of my favorite and most useful (once you understand them) which is HyperMemory buttons. These are far and away the most powerful feature on older Yaseu radios, and is the reason I will continue to look for and recomend either an older FT7800, FT7900(not the Chinese clone!!!) or the awesome FT8800. Have been looking at the FT70 to recomend to another ham that wants to get past the Baofeng craze. NOPE not the FT70!!
Damn Yaesu, why can't they just release a new firmware that adds a menu option to switch the dial to volume? That can't be that hard surely? I go cycling with mine, but can't adjust the volume while I'm riding. Im forced to use it as a C4FM radio as It has way better mic and speaker than the FT2D, 3D and the 5D, is the cheapest of the lot. I would go with the the FT1XD nowadays if I could find one. I had 2 years ago and let them both go. pah!
Same here, really like the radio. But yes vol. Know is a must. Of all of digital modes C4FM is the easiest to work with. Tried Dmr no thanks I am a radio technology guy,not so much into computers Sorry put not in to them . And yes I am using a smart phone. Don't judge me 😆
Let's be real some of us don't have the budget for more than one HT 8P So we don't have issues with the flip flop volume knobs. I do love me VX-6 and need to get the Specter pouch. wish it came in red to match my nerd radio chest rig. Can't wait to see more on the VX-6
I bought my FT 70 three years ago for use on a repeater that is a few miles south of me and it does just fine in that regard but you are right about the volume button I hate that period and i to have shut it off by accident just like you did and I agree with you on the battery but I bought the drop in charger with two other batteries that way I always have a charged battery, I love the digital side of it great radio for that, that’s what I bought it for was for YSF but they need to make a 2100 mAh battery that would be great but if someone is a new ham and just getting into the digital side of ham they are a great start.
Great video, ive been looking at the ft 70 as a second radio. Now I'm rethinking, may stick with my basic analog radios. Side note, with the ft 3dr are you not able to switch the volume and channel controls. I have the ft 2dr and I have switched them so the big part is the volume and did it with front panel.
Thorough rev! - Got my FT60 last week, cost me the eqv.of 70$ on the Swedish Ebay, - it had an 1800Mah battery when it came - great HT!! - 73 Levi - (weird volume control on the 70!)
I’m one that likes this radio, but your post is spot on. You’ll think with time you will get used to the wacky, but you will not. Oh I wish the VX-6 had C4FM.
Great review...agree 100% on everything you said. I purchased a new aftermarket 2200mA lithium battery for my FT60. Solved my issue for me purchasing my FT70. Will gift it to my son when he gets his license...lol
Hi Scott, My FT-70D was my EDC HT for quite a while as we have several System Fusion repeaters and gateways locally, however now the local 2m analog repeater is back on air I've mostly gone back to the trusty FT-65. Why? Partly the volume control thing...if I have the -70 on the desk at the RR station where I work monitoring the local repeater or whatever and a customer turns up, fiddling with that dratted volume control is a real PITA, the same applies if operating mobile in the XYL's car and I need to turn it up. Like you, I have also unintentionally switched it off a number of times which is bloody annoying and more likely to happen if the rig is in the Yaesu soft case as you can't feel the different shape of the button. The other advantage the -65 has over both the -70 and the -60 is (for me) the louder received audio...800mW for 10% THD as opposed to 700mW (-70) and 400mW (-60). If I'm out walking near a road or in Central London the -65 cuts through the noise way better than the other two, and even though the -70 is not a lot different on paper, in reality its audio (on analog...much better on digital) sounds kinda "thin" in comparison. However, the deal killer for me is battery life. The -65 on a full charge will easily do me for a couple of days, if I take the -70 to work for the morning it'll need a charge if I want to take it out with me later in the day. A higher capacity battery would be a great help. I don't EDC the -60 as they're no longer available here; mine gets cosseted and is saved for hill walking, SOTA etc. where its superior receiver, instantly adjustable squelch and other "old school" features are much appreciated. On the subject of volume...perhaps this is somewhere the new IC-T10 will win fans, despite its price? Many thanks for this thought-provoking video, 73, Simon G0CIQ
Excellent review. Very, very good. I watch reviews for the good AND the bad but most reviewers spend too much time on mainly the good. Thank you, you need both sides of an argument to make an informed decision
FT-70D is my second radio. My first was a Baofeng. I gotta say, on programming these with a computer, you’re right, it’s a pain in the butt. But, I find that because of how they’ve set it up so you can program it yourself, I find it’s easier than trying to set it all up with chirp, whether I’m talking about Baofeng or the FT-70D. It’s easy. But that works for me specifically because I don’t need to program all of the repeaters in a 1000 mile radius of where I am and store them in separate banks. In fact, I have 7 in my range, so I have one of my banks for those 7 repeaters and another bank for simplex calling and open wide-band digital modes. So I get that this isn’t the case for everyone. That said, when you’re talking about what it does, and I can only compare with a UV-5R, this radio is wizardly. I mean, the digital receiver mode on it doesn’t even make sense. RST 519, 44kms away from the repeater and it sounds like a clear cell phone call. Given what I know about this, I’m probably going to be getting an FT5DR as my next radio, but for now I’m just going to get this one fully kitted out with a car battery, car antenna and a few other goodies like a drop-in charger so I don’t wear out the rubber gaskets. Because outside of the programmability, I like literally everything about this radio, volume control scheme included.
Unfortunately, if you're determined to get into Fusion/C4FM your only choices for HT's are the FT-70D, FT-5D or a used FT-3D. DStar isn't much better with Kenwood's and ICOM's being your main choices. P25 is a little more practical in terms of finding decent used Motorola HT's at reasonable prices. And then there is DMR. Which offers a vast choice of reasonably priced radios but an increased level of difficulty in programming. All, of these factors have affected my enthusiasm for digital modes in general. I'm still waiting for one of these modes to finally break through and become the dominant mode. But it looks like the market might just give up altogether before that ever happens.
@@KS6DAY I have DMR, Fusion and DStar repeaters where I live. I just needed a place to start looking. I know DMR is less expensive to start looking at digital but I am liking fusion better, I have a VX-6R as my first Ham Radio HT. Thanks again. Waiting for your videos on the VX-6R. KI5ZKB.
So I was able to program mine using chirp. Memory banks all worked but the crappy software that comes with it did not work for me with the groups. Now I found a better way to do the data sync without the charger, Just use the battery and slightly pop the bottom out and while holding the AMS button down, click it back in. Works perfectly.
I use an MH-12 speaker mic (with adapter) with this HT when carrying it around. If someone's transmit audio is too low or otherwise hard to copy I just hold the speaker mic closer to my ear to immediately "turn up" the volume. This also has some other benefits - it reduces fatigue in having to hold the radio, I can better control how I speak into the mic - distance and angle to get the right volume level and avoid making breath sounds and the antenna is not right next to my head. I am looking for a speaker mic that has a volume control but have concerns that if it isn't properly designed using a "pad" it might damage the audio output stage of this HT. I would not advise using a headset with this radio unless you want to damage your hearing because of this terrible design. This has got to be one of the worst in industrial design history!
Fantastic video. I adore the FT70 D, but I have shut the radio off by mistake like yourself several times while just wanting to adjust the volume. I think many of us give it a pass because we're Fusion Folks who don't have any other choices at this price point. That said, your video nails it! Great presentation! Looking forward to a successor to the FT70 D one day.
I wish that I could give this video 2 or 3 thumbs up... There is SO MUCH truth in what you say in this accurate review of the radio. I've had my FT-70D now for over 3 months, and I am experiencing more of the issues that you explain in this video such as "turning the damn radio off" when trying to adjust the volume, and the dexterity test when trying to program the radio using the cable that is included. I'd love to unload this radio to somebody locally, but I'd feel guilty to dump these issues on them.
We tend to get information overloaded as we age. I was interested in the VX-6R and then everyone and their brother started telling me about their radio experience and I coupled that with UA-camr information. I couldn't figure out why I wasn't finding much information about the FT-6R but, I was seeing information about the FT-5R and FT-70. Needless to say, I ordered a FT-70D with the MARS mod instead of the VX-6R with the MARS mod. I would've spent the additional $70 for the VX-6R which I believe is a mid level instead of an entry level.
I have ft3d first week of owning radio pocket clip slipped out of my pocket and radio fell on the ground bending antenna and breaking vol/sel knob. Was about a year before I got around to find replacement parts and paying someone to solder radio (60$) after that works ok. But I definitely don’t think it is worth the money especially for how fragile the radio is. Also the radio now will occasionally restart for no reason. I assume this is do to some sort of short in the repair or some other unknown damage don’t recommend
The FT-70D has the best audio of any Yaesu HT I've heard, even the FT-60R. That said, it is much harder than the 60 to use if you are visually-impaired or blind, and relying on audible cues from the radio to tell you where you are in the memories, menus, in the list of CTCSS tones etc. They could have very easily included unique beeps at various key points, like they did with the 60, such as at memory 1, menu channel 1, CTCSS 100 Hz etc.
I agree with the volume control gripe, but it is something I can see "A" sense to. I have accidentally turned the volume up on a knob quite a few times, then blown my ear out when someone calls. I know this is all on me, and not something the radio should try to solve. I think someone thought this is the solution to that problem though.
Hi, I collect Yaesus HTs, I now have 50 of them, all different models. The FT70 is no direct comparison to the FT60, this latter one should rather be compared to the FT65 (which is almost a rebadged Baofeng with better RX). If it weren't for collection purposes, I woultn't get an FT70, but the FT1XD which has larger range for RX. My preferred HT anyway, is the VX6, which transmits even in Airband and Broadcast, and has the concentric knobs as it should be: volume and frequency. 73!!
I was just about to purchase this radio. Lol. And I didn't even click on this vid on purpose. Which yaesu should I get? I wanted a triband but yes a bit outdated. Any thoughts on wouxan? Thanks
@@KS6DAY yes. Vx 6r, that's the tri band I was referring to, I hear it's great also. Just seems "old-ish" and I'm willing to spend that much on GOOD radio but...
@@Jimbo_Conn I reviewed a KG-UV9P in this video - ua-cam.com/video/T0ZBvBZkjZI/v-deo.htmlsi=3--6OmGdz3T2e3nW . They are basically the same radio with the most fundamental difference being the dark display option on the KG-UV9PX. They are both very good radios.
I don't understand why the can't add the FM broadcast band. How hard would that be? Its right next to air band. I also noticed Yaesu doesn't care about our comments. I have tried writing their support and they ignore me.
First thing I learned about the ham community, someone is bound to complain about anything that is different from what they have learned, and will rather complain than learn to adapt to new systems, software, or innovations. ADMS software works great, RTFM, and follow the directions exactly, and it's fine. Do it in the wrong, and it doesn't work. Funny how that is, it's almost like you actually need to follow the directions! The volume ctl, I see both an advantage, and disadvantage. It's nice to know that it's loud, and there is no need to keep checking to see if the volume has been bumped down. In the end, I think the assurance it stays where set outweighs the inconvenience of the 2-step process. Only negs I have ever encountered, short battery life,
firmware update. Give a choice for it to do volume normally (not memories, channel) and press the side button labelled VOL I guess and turn knob for the channel, memories. It will only do one thing without a side button press but have the choice, just firmware and another thing in the menu options. I would have as volume normally, more useful as you say.
Yes. A simple firmware update allowing you to toggle the control function between volume and channel control would solve the problem quite well. But I doubt they will ever do it because they already imprinted "VOL" on the button and for it to do any function other than that would be to admit they put out a bad design. Institutional arrogance just won't permit that.
So glad I watched this, who at Yaesu is purposefully making things OVER complicated?? And inconsistent…same with how you access wires x with FT3, 5, 100, 200 , 400 and now 300 & 500…all different …ridiculous….the instructions are 63 pages!
FT-60R can not be charged from Ext. DC socket directly so need to be the cradle in box. FT-70DR has this capability so no cradle needed in basic setup.
It needed : 3500mAh battery Drop in Desktop Charger. Bigger audio Speaker. And a flat PTT button. That's the reason many hams buy Anytone and baofeng ht's.
I will buy this radio specifically for the clunky volume control. Thing is, I am paragliding and at takeoff happened that the knob of my Baofeng turned and I ended up without radio. If I can find out that the locking option also turns off the effect of the knob, I am all conviced❤
I'm flummoxed by this thing, I just got it today. Using the Yeasu-provided CPS, and the pidgin "English" manual, I cannot see how to scan memory banks. In the software, I can tick a box and assign a channel to a bank. Fine. Now, how do I scan those banks??? No way I can find. Also the terminology is completely illogical and inconsistent. The "Programmed MEMORY Scans" (save up to 50!) are not channel or bank scans - the parameters they take are start and end FREQUENCY! Mr. Yeasu I do not wish to scan frequency ranges, I wish to scan banks of channels I have set up. I'm not ready to dump it yet, but if this thing is as bad as it seems now, it ain't going to last long!
I ran into the same problem with banks and was unable to get them working properly until I acquired the RT Systems programming software. After that I was able to properly set up the memory banks for scanning.
I bought this radio and am not impressed. I don't like the volume control and the non-standard keypad layout. YSF and Wires-X is confusing. DMR works for me. I haven't decided if I'm keeping the radio, or selling it on eBay.
Bad engineering with any recent model of anything is prevalent. It isn't just with radios. During the past 3 years engineering design on so many products have become so poor you have to wonder if the people who are designing this equipment actually USE the equipment? ANY amateur radio operator would have had a problem with the volume control within 5 sec, so I think the answer is no. I think we have a bunch of rookie designers who can engineer functions into equipment but have absolutely no experience with UI. One car manufacturer decided to put the turn signal switch on a steering while, which obviously rotates! So when you're in a turn and want to hit the blinker, good luck with that. Oh, and there are no detents for the buttons, so while driving, you're moving your finger around the steering wheel pressing and pressing until you finally find the right spot, oh and you have to push that button hard. After you get it on you find out you accidentally hit the right instead of the left blinker. How the hell did this get by any type of quality assurance control, or were they laid off? Probably laid off to reduce costs. My TV just got an update. I now have to go through many screens and menus (with delays) to go from my streaming device to the tuner instead just pressing the source button followed by a simple selection, which I've done for years. Really??? But the list goes on.
Anyway I like my 70 as it has good selectivity, good sensitivity and even the satellite operation is possible with proper setup of radio. Nice feature is C4FM. Using the VW mode in AMBE+2 with voice code of 4.4 kbps, error correction code of 2.8 kbps gives great voice quality. I still have my trusty FT-60R but I like 70 too a lot. (And yes, I purchased the cradle additionally too, 😎) Good luck. Petr
You don’t need to use the power adapter or an AC power connection at all to use ADMS-10 or CHIRP. This is despite what Yaesu say and despite other videos to the contrary, including this one. 1. Turn radio on and plug in USB cable. 2. Remove battery. 3. Hold down AMS button on keypad and reconnect battery. You are now in programming mode. No AC required. No $25 cable required.
Very neat info. If there is a wiki for coms you should contribute.
Still... Remove battery!!?? Madness.
Yep, I had no issue programming mine just following the instructions. Didn’t take long at all and IIRC the Yaesu software even downloaded the frequencies from Radio Reference for me.
Great & Honest Review. I have two FT-70's and like them quite a lot! I totally agree with you and others on the volume control issue as it is a pain but other than that it's definitely my favorite radio. I work many events with my local club and choose it over my other radios every time. I haven't had any battery issues but do keep a spare with me. It's so easy to program from the keypad that I've never tried computer programming, although yours and other reviews have revealed what a nightmare it is. Digital with the 70 is super easy and we have several fusion repeaters in the area. So for my usage, I'll always choose the 70 over my 4x or the Anytone 878. Thanks again for another great video!
As a new HAM Tech and not knowing shyte I was strongly encouraged to go with the Yaesu ft-70D as my first radio. Although pressing the volume button while turning the top dial was unorthodox it hasn’t bothered me. You made your point. I am pretty sure you could have done it just as persuasively in less than 1 or 2 minutes? You are obviously an expert and likely have thousands of hours of experience dating back to your AF service. That adds weight to your opinion. But I can’t believe I just spent 25 minutes waiting to hear “how the radio was ruined by bad ideas” only to finally learn that your biggest complaint was adjusting the volume? You made a better case for the unusual programming sequence. You could have stated your credentials and named both problems in less than 3 minutes. Maybe I am in the wrong hobby?
Are you a sadddd ham?😢@@careybledsoe
I am a newly licensed Ham. December 2021 I received my callsign. I went to the Dayton Hamvention in May of this year, and I hadn't done a lot of research in handhelds, but I had heard that Baofeng and cheap Chinese radios didn't preform as well as the Yaesu, Icom or Kenwood radios. I picked up a my first Yaesu handheld (and maybe my last) the FT-70D at the Hamvention, and wish that I had done more research on the product before picking it up. The battery life is terrible, and it doesn't come with a drop-in charger at all. I get about 6 and a half hours of receive-only life on the battery before it goes on to life support. Very disappointing. My cheap Baofeng radio gets about 18 hours of standby time, but a Yaesu FT-70D radio that costs the equivalent of 6 Baofengs only lasts 1/3rd the time. The $25 Baofeng comes with a drop-in charger too... I get good signal transmit and receive quality on the unit, but it's tough to talk on the air when the battery is always reporting that it is getting low...
On the FT3:
Long press (disp)
Select (config)
Item #22 is Dial Knob Change
Bingo. FT2d and FT5d same as far as changing function.
I agree with your findings. Yaesu lacks consistency amongst their products. The nice thing about Icom handhelds (ID-31, 51 and 52) is they use the same battery which there are three capacities to choose from. All 3 Icom radios use the same drop in charger as well. All 3 radios function the same way. If you know how to use one, you know how to use all three plus the ID-4100 and 5100. Lastly, when using D-star, distance to other station is shown the same way amongst all the newer Icom D-star radios. The FTM-400 is the only radio the shows distance information in DN mode on the main screen. All the other Fusion radios require button pushing to see distance information.
It sucks that just about nobody has D Star repeaters around here.
That s one thing I like a bout the ftXd series, is all the accessories are compatible.
FYI, on the FT-3D you can swap the functions of the two knobs around in the settings.
So I see it as Yaesu, being in the business of selling radios, makes various high quality models with years of solid performance. Making radios with different features allows them to cater to more individual preferences. They might… as I did… buy an FT60 and an FT70. Every good manufacturer has a good, better, best option. I also HIGHLY doubt Yaesu didn’t field test, panel test etc. this radio. The reality is some probably really like the fact that the volume needs to be intentionally adjusted. Just as easy as it is to turn the volume up, it can unintentionally be turned down as well. I will agree it would have been nice to have the option to have it be changed in settings like others. I think going to one knob was being viewed as simplifying things visually and not look more complicated than it needs to be. Also… HAM radio is unfortunately, let’s be honest, a dying form of communication and many that are becoming HAMS are just getting them for emergency use, prepping etc. Just my thoughts here. Thanks for the video.
And on the FT-5R
Thanks so much for all the info, Scott.
That volume control is definitely a dealbreaker for me.
I just bought the VX-6R and love it, even with the primitive screen. I'm not too fussed on YSF as I have a DMR radio and have not set it up yet, maybe later someday.
Cheers 73
I like my VX-6. It is the 21 century. To put in a freq there should be arrows to go up and down to put in offset, -+. tone, etc. without digging into menus. Just one rolling screen that does it all. All yaesu radios should do fusion to promote the platform.
Great review. At one point, I was considering this radio for outdoor use (Jeeping and caving) but, your FT-60 review swayed me. The VX6 is a possibility. But, cost is a definite factor. I have an FT3D and I really like it. but, I'm afraid I might break it, so it stays home most of the time. I do agree that Yeasu is lacking consistency in the design department. Hopefully they will take note of your reviews. Good job and thank you for the information.
Spot on review!! The battery that just came with mine is horrible! Connect thru my PDN to Wires X, make a contact or two and half the battery is gone!!! I ordered an extra battery with the radio and the extra battery I got was for the FT3! AND the RT systems software and cable makes the programming like normal radios. Will never do the Yaesu abortion procedure to program the darn radio!
The Yaesu FT-60 is based off the commercial Vertex VX-400 series chassis. A 25 year old COMMERCIAL portable. The FT-70 is based off the VX-8 VX-7 VX-6 chassis. A 20 year old hammy design. The reason the 60 is a better radio is because it was based off a commercial radio from day one when Yaesu and Vertex Standard were still under one umbrella. The 70 is a fine radio, but it's 100% hammy whereas the 60 has SOME commercial linage. This is evident by the myriad of accessories. High capacity batteries being the biggest. mAh is mAh regardless of type. The 70 on the other hand, was designed well after Yaesu and Vertex Standard parted & the overall implementation shows. Specifications on both radios are well published. WELL PUBLISHED. Anyone that purchases either of the two without reviewing the published specifications, be it RX capability or anything else gets exactly what they deserve. The 70 was NEVER meant to be a replacement for the 60. That was the role of the 65. Yaesu knew they failed well before the initial release of the 65, thus the reason the 60 is still available to this day.
I have to disagree that is was meant to be an upgrade to the ft-60, it's A downgraded FT-1xdr. I have the ft-1 and the menus are much the same including the volume control. But there is a setting in the menu to allow you to just tap the volume button, then you can adjust it with out holding it down.
Can you tell us what menu setting to change?? I can not see anything about volume button tapping.
Agree on the volume control issue, why there isn't an option in the menu to make the knob volume is beyond me. I would also like to see an extended battery similar to the FT-65 as well.
It should be a setting you can change. It is better than the radio I use for work, where the volume is just buttons on the side.
I realize this video is a few years old. I just got an FT-70D and I use RT systems for programming. You don't have to take off the battery to program with RTS. You can link memory banks, any number of them so if you have the need for a bank with greater than 100 memory slots just put the rest in a 2nd bank and link them.
That is correct. You can accomplish all of those things and don't need to do the weird battery thing with the RTS CPS. But not with the factory CPS. So, if you want your FT-70D to be fully functional it requires purchasing RTS for an additional $50. Thus, the actual cost of the radio is $220 for it to be fully functional. Which is exactly what I did because I wanted banks. Having to do that didn't sit well with me and only added to my irritation. I have never encountered another radio that requires you do that. They are all fully programmable with their existing factory CPS.
Another no B.S. review. I love my FT-60 and was thinking about picking up the FT-70 to have another radio that I could communicate to with Fusion from my FT-3D if I gave the FT-70 to another ham. I have seen some of the negatives of the FT-70 in reviews. Your video really pointed out the flaws in the FT-70. If someone gets butthurt about the review, all I can tell them is you were honest and fair. As to the volume control on the FT-3D, look at page 83 in the manual. You can swap knob functions between channel and volume with an easy change in the menu. I may still buy a FT-70 just for point to point comms with another ham and not try to use the FT-70 like I would the FT-60. Thanks Scott. At least I now know what I'm getting myself into.
Don't be put off; the ft70d is a great radio, the drama queen is being picky! If you used the radio in a car there would be a problem in changing the volume, now programming on a pc is annoying! And don't forget when there's no one on 2m/70cm yon have digital where you talk around the world.
I own two. Agree with volume. But what I hate most is that it drains the battery when OFF!!! Only way to store the HT is plugged in. I like that it charges on anything between like 6v-16v and I made powerpole pigtails for them so it's easy. What I love most is it's the cheapest way to Fusion. This radio and a hotspot is $140 cheaper than the FT-5DR alone.
Batteries America sells a 2200mah battery for the FT-70. Organizing the channels into banks is rather easy actually. The boxes to the far right of the screen (you'll need to scroll to see) are simply ticked as the user desires - thus putting the channel into a bank(s). The banks can be named under the settings tab.
@@karlmadsen3179 Ppl make mistakes. We help each other - it's just what hams do. K4QEP
Yes, please explain how to scan those banks! Say I have channels in Banks 1, 7 9 and 17 I want to scan - how is that accomplished? Very simple on my Icom 2730!
@@cmerton I am not aware of a way to "scan between banks". However, one can create a separate bank with the channels from 1, 7, 9, and 17 and scan between those channels within that specific bank. Channels can exist in more than one bank. Hope that helps - K4QEP
I have had this radio 2 years. Programming ADMS software sucks. I managed ... using the software, to get the radio to the point you can't do a factory reset.
I recently programmed a few Boufengs for friends with Chirp. What a delight. What esse.
Same. Volume issue with the VX-8R, I sold it. The FT70 would be my EDC except for the battery and volume issues. VX-6 is my EDC and works great for that.
Thank you for this excellent and honest review. I was very close to buying this radio, but I think the volume control would drive me crazy. I adjust volume all the time and for the same reasons you mentioned. You saved me a lot of frustration. I guess the search continues. Thanks again!
The programming sequence is crazy . The guy who came up with that must have been drunk or a plant from Icom. He forgot to add stand on one foot while programming.
You must miss the Motorola you used in the military and security this hammy stuff is just cheap tatt.
Another rock- solid review, looking forward to a review on the Anytone AT-D878UVII Plus as well as more on the Yaesu VX-6. A newbie here getting ready to take my technician exam. Great channel tons of good info here keep up the great content!
The Yaesu VX-6r is a solid radio and has been around for a very long time. One of the best Yaesu ever made and I really with they’d make more radios in the VX line and even bring back the VX-5r, VX-7r and VX-8r.
Wish I had seen this before I bought it! I have been finding it awkward, but it’s my first real miniature HT, so I didn’t know better. I had a technician license way back in the 90s and an old RadioShack 202. Got back in the ham radio this year and started with a HF rig. I spent a while contemplating which HT to get and finally settled on this one. It seemed nice. I do love all of its capabilities, but did find the volume control awkward. I thought it was just me not being used to it.
It's too bad that the FT-70D fell short as a successor. I personal love the FT-60R for a few reasons. 1) Very simple to program; 2) Independent physical volume and squelch knob; 3) Inexpensive batteries with good runtime.
In terms of negatives for the FT-60R, I have a problem with: 1) No direct DC charging (I have an older model from 2011 that supports direct charging); 2) The 3.5mm jack easily backs out and will engage the PTT (a rubber band should not be required); 3) No stated IP rating.
I am very hard on my gear and finally destroyed my FT-60R with sweat and salt after two years of trail running. I have three more FT-60's in my fleet, but I am seriously trying to transition to the VX-6R for the IP67 rating.
The VX-6 has it's own issues--namely, more difficult to program from the front panel and very low power output when using the AA battery tray. I look forward to hearing more about the VX-6R on your channel. I will be doing a comparison on my channel as I transition from the FT-60R to the VX-6R for EDC.
As I finish this, I realized that this comment had very little to do with the FT-70D. Based on your video, it's clear that the 70 is not for me. Thank you. 73 de KT1RUN.
Ive had my 70 for a few years. I leave my volume on 12-14 and use the lapel mic. If it is too quite, I listen closer. If it is too loud, I cup my hand over the mic to quite it. Playing with volumes is not a good idea, and a bad practice. Keep it loud, and just cup the speaker if needed.
Now, the idea of changing the side button to channel, now that is a fantastic idea.
Yeah that would be a big problem for me too. I am glad I watched your video because I was genuinely thinking about making that radio my first digital radio. Thank you.
After seeing this review; I'm thankful I found it before I spent my money. I would have been furious about the same things you've identified.
I guess I'm still shopping. Thanks for the assist.
I'm anxious to see a video of how you have your radios set up as far as your programming. Thanks again for a great video! W1SLC.
It's odd about the FT-70. Lousy battery that goes flat even if switched off. It's been out a few years now, yet no new replacement for it has been forthcoming. Odd for a company which seems to bring out new models every five minutes!!
A cradle charger for this can be bought from eBay.
I have 2 FT-70's. I am fairly happy with them. They do C4FM which I use a lot and they make great around the house radio's. The batteries at least for me seem adequate. However you hit the nail on the head with both the programming issue and especially the volume control issue that I noticed the first time I wore it in a pouch at a ham feast. I even experienced the recliner upgrade like you. When I wear this one out, it's back to fully manual.
Me too. Two FT-70's and a slow powered recliner (tonight power went out and I had to climb out of it.) It's back to manual when this one breaks. I don't like the volume control on the radio, but for me it's that the batteries drain when they are off. That's the biggest drawback. But I got Fusion on the cheap!
Another issue with the 70 is the mismatch in TX audio levels between analog and C4FM. A mic gain setting of 7 or 8 is perfect for analog, and 1 or 2 sounds good on Yaesu System Fusion.
This is interesting and also my major complaint about amateur radio. Some operators sound fine, but so many have audio levels so low I wonder how anyone can hear them. Thus, the need to constantly rotate a volume knob. For FM, WHY don't they put auto-level controls in mike audio circuits? Seems to me the radio should be designed to maintain a specific transmit modulation level whether you're whispering or shouting.
I had absolutely no issue programming mine with the free software from Yaesu. I just booted the radio into programming mode per the instructions and it worked fine.
Very accurate assessment. I too hate the volume control and short battery life.
Just like my FT1XD and it drove me craxy when I need to change the volume.
Saved me 200 bucks. Thanks for the review on the ft70d. I will be keeping my FT60r . Subscribed to the channel.
Great review. Can you also suggest how the Anytone 878UV compares to the Yaesu FT70 when it comes to analog Rx/Tx quality? Given that Anytone is not superheterodyne, is the Yeasu significantly better? Thanks!
A dual conversion superhet shall knock any Chinese radio out of the ball park.
Cheers for the vid. I'd been considering 70D as a small, lightweight portable for use in my car... but 2-hand volume operation is an absolute, 100% no-go!
Glad I watched this, was just about to grab one. Thanks!
I have the 60 and the 70. I heard the 60 doesn't charge straight from cable anymore that's why they uncle the drop in charger. Haven't tried it though.
To me they are both back up radios. I have the ft3d and the ft5d.
Wow... never really knew this about the FT70D... knowing this, I can see the major design flaw. It would be a deal breaker for me too if I were considering this HT.
Very well thought out and presented video! Something tells me some people at Yaesu will be listening to this one carefully. But sales on the FT 60 probably increased a bit too so there you go.
THIS is the kind of review that I look for!! excellent USER review. Another thing they could have done is to make the VOLUME button stick or be a toggle so you could leave it in volume mode until you need to change the channel. Yaesu has lost their way on most of their radio designs. The newer mobile radios do NOT have channel banks at all! They stopped doing one of my favorite and most useful (once you understand them) which is HyperMemory buttons. These are far and away the most powerful feature on older Yaseu radios, and is the reason I will continue to look for and recomend either an older FT7800, FT7900(not the Chinese clone!!!) or the awesome FT8800. Have been looking at the FT70 to recomend to another ham that wants to get past the Baofeng craze. NOPE not the FT70!!
Saved me $170 - thanks.
Damn Yaesu, why can't they just release a new firmware that adds a menu option to switch the dial to volume? That can't be that hard surely?
I go cycling with mine, but can't adjust the volume while I'm riding.
Im forced to use it as a C4FM radio as It has way better mic and speaker than the FT2D, 3D and the 5D, is the cheapest of the lot.
I would go with the the FT1XD nowadays if I could find one. I had 2 years ago and let them both go. pah!
They could probably switch the volume/channel change function with a firmware release.
Same here, really like the radio. But yes vol. Know is a must. Of all of digital modes C4FM is the easiest to work with. Tried Dmr no thanks I am a radio technology guy,not so much into computers
Sorry put not in to them . And yes I am using a smart phone. Don't judge me 😆
Let's be real some of us don't have the budget for more than one HT 8P So we don't have issues with the flip flop volume knobs. I do love me VX-6 and need to get the Specter pouch. wish it came in red to match my nerd radio chest rig. Can't wait to see more on the VX-6
I bought my FT 70 three years ago for use on a repeater that is a few miles south of me and it does just fine in that regard but you are right about the volume button I hate that period and i to have shut it off by accident just like you did and I agree with you on the battery but I bought the drop in charger with two other batteries that way I always have a charged battery, I love the digital side of it great radio for that, that’s what I bought it for was for YSF but they need to make a 2100 mAh battery that would be great but if someone is a new ham and just getting into the digital side of ham they are a great start.
Great video, ive been looking at the ft 70 as a second radio. Now I'm rethinking, may stick with my basic analog radios.
Side note, with the ft 3dr are you not able to switch the volume and channel controls. I have the ft 2dr and I have switched them so the big part is the volume and did it with front panel.
Thorough rev! - Got my FT60 last week, cost me the eqv.of 70$ on the Swedish Ebay, - it had an 1800Mah battery when it came - great HT!! - 73 Levi - (weird volume control on the 70!)
I’m one that likes this radio, but your post is spot on. You’ll think with time you will get used to the wacky, but you will not.
Oh I wish the VX-6 had C4FM.
Great review...agree 100% on everything you said. I purchased a new aftermarket 2200mA lithium battery for my FT60. Solved my issue for me purchasing my FT70. Will gift it to my son when he gets his license...lol
Hi Scott,
My FT-70D was my EDC HT for quite a while as we have several System Fusion repeaters and gateways locally, however now the local 2m analog repeater is back on air I've mostly gone back to the trusty FT-65. Why? Partly the volume control thing...if I have the -70 on the desk at the RR station where I work monitoring the local repeater or whatever and a customer turns up, fiddling with that dratted volume control is a real PITA, the same applies if operating mobile in the XYL's car and I need to turn it up. Like you, I have also unintentionally switched it off a number of times which is bloody annoying and more likely to happen if the rig is in the Yaesu soft case as you can't feel the different shape of the button.
The other advantage the -65 has over both the -70 and the -60 is (for me) the louder received audio...800mW for 10% THD as opposed to 700mW (-70) and 400mW (-60). If I'm out walking near a road or in Central London the -65 cuts through the noise way better than the other two, and even though the -70 is not a lot different on paper, in reality its audio (on analog...much better on digital) sounds kinda "thin" in comparison.
However, the deal killer for me is battery life. The -65 on a full charge will easily do me for a couple of days, if I take the -70 to work for the morning it'll need a charge if I want to take it out with me later in the day. A higher capacity battery would be a great help.
I don't EDC the -60 as they're no longer available here; mine gets cosseted and is saved for hill walking, SOTA etc. where its superior receiver, instantly adjustable squelch and other "old school" features are much appreciated.
On the subject of volume...perhaps this is somewhere the new IC-T10 will win fans, despite its price?
Many thanks for this thought-provoking video,
73, Simon G0CIQ
Excellent review. Very, very good. I watch reviews for the good AND the bad but most reviewers spend too much time on mainly the good. Thank you, you need both sides of an argument to make an informed decision
When you explained the volume control, I dismissed this radio as a possible purchase. Thanks!
Now that I’ve used one, it’s very similar to the FT-1 with things like the volume. To me, it’s already muscle memory and no big deal.
FT-70D is my second radio. My first was a Baofeng.
I gotta say, on programming these with a computer, you’re right, it’s a pain in the butt. But, I find that because of how they’ve set it up so you can program it yourself, I find it’s easier than trying to set it all up with chirp, whether I’m talking about Baofeng or the FT-70D. It’s easy. But that works for me specifically because I don’t need to program all of the repeaters in a 1000 mile radius of where I am and store them in separate banks. In fact, I have 7 in my range, so I have one of my banks for those 7 repeaters and another bank for simplex calling and open wide-band digital modes. So I get that this isn’t the case for everyone.
That said, when you’re talking about what it does, and I can only compare with a UV-5R, this radio is wizardly. I mean, the digital receiver mode on it doesn’t even make sense. RST 519, 44kms away from the repeater and it sounds like a clear cell phone call.
Given what I know about this, I’m probably going to be getting an FT5DR as my next radio, but for now I’m just going to get this one fully kitted out with a car battery, car antenna and a few other goodies like a drop-in charger so I don’t wear out the rubber gaskets. Because outside of the programmability, I like literally everything about this radio, volume control scheme included.
Great review. If not FT-70D than which one would next in line. Starting to look into digital don't want to spent too much but I want a fusion radio.
Unfortunately, if you're determined to get into Fusion/C4FM your only choices for HT's are the FT-70D, FT-5D or a used FT-3D. DStar isn't much better with Kenwood's and ICOM's being your main choices. P25 is a little more practical in terms of finding decent used Motorola HT's at reasonable prices. And then there is DMR. Which offers a vast choice of reasonably priced radios but an increased level of difficulty in programming. All, of these factors have affected my enthusiasm for digital modes in general. I'm still waiting for one of these modes to finally break through and become the dominant mode. But it looks like the market might just give up altogether before that ever happens.
@@KS6DAY I have DMR, Fusion and DStar repeaters where I live. I just needed a place to start looking. I know DMR is less expensive to start looking at digital but I am liking fusion better, I have a VX-6R as my first Ham Radio HT. Thanks again. Waiting for your videos on the VX-6R. KI5ZKB.
So I was able to program mine using chirp. Memory banks all worked but the crappy software that comes with it did not work for me with the groups. Now I found a better way to do the data sync without the charger, Just use the battery and slightly pop the bottom out and while holding the AMS button down, click it back in. Works perfectly.
I use an MH-12 speaker mic (with adapter) with this HT when carrying it around. If someone's transmit audio is too low or otherwise hard to copy I just hold the speaker mic closer to my ear to immediately "turn up" the volume. This also has some other benefits - it reduces fatigue in having to hold the radio, I can better control how I speak into the mic - distance and angle to get the right volume level and avoid making breath sounds and the antenna is not right next to my head. I am looking for a speaker mic that has a volume control but have concerns that if it isn't properly designed using a "pad" it might damage the audio output stage of this HT. I would not advise using a headset with this radio unless you want to damage your hearing because of this terrible design. This has got to be one of the worst in industrial design history!
Can you get local fm radio music broadcasts on here like a baofeng? Thanks.
On the FT3 you can change the knob set up to be just like the VX-6, it's in the menu
Well done
Fantastic video. I adore the FT70 D, but I have shut the radio off by mistake like yourself several times while just wanting to adjust the volume. I think many of us give it a pass because we're Fusion Folks who don't have any other choices at this price point. That said, your video nails it! Great presentation! Looking forward to a successor to the FT70 D one day.
I wish that I could give this video 2 or 3 thumbs up... There is SO MUCH truth in what you say in this accurate review of the radio. I've had my FT-70D now for over 3 months, and I am experiencing more of the issues that you explain in this video such as "turning the damn radio off" when trying to adjust the volume, and the dexterity test when trying to program the radio using the cable that is included. I'd love to unload this radio to somebody locally, but I'd feel guilty to dump these issues on them.
We tend to get information overloaded as we age. I was interested in the VX-6R and then everyone and their brother started telling me about their radio experience and I coupled that with UA-camr information. I couldn't figure out why I wasn't finding much information about the FT-6R but, I was seeing information about the FT-5R and FT-70. Needless to say, I ordered a FT-70D with the MARS mod instead of the VX-6R with the MARS mod. I would've spent the additional $70 for the VX-6R which I believe is a mid level instead of an entry level.
And I sort of agree. Brilliant but what were they thinking
Heads up Not a fan of the ft3dr but you can go into the settings and change the volume and channel nobbs to how you want them. As always great video
I have ft3d first week of owning radio pocket clip slipped out of my pocket and radio fell on the ground bending antenna and breaking vol/sel knob. Was about a year before I got around to find replacement parts and paying someone to solder radio (60$) after that works ok. But I definitely don’t think it is worth the money especially for how fragile the radio is. Also the radio now will occasionally restart for no reason. I assume this is do to some sort of short in the repair or some other unknown damage don’t recommend
The FT-70D has the best audio of any Yaesu HT I've heard, even the FT-60R.
That said, it is much harder than the 60 to use if you are visually-impaired or blind, and relying on audible cues from the radio to tell you where you are in the memories, menus, in the list of CTCSS tones etc. They could have very easily included unique beeps at various key points, like they did with the 60, such as at memory 1, menu channel 1, CTCSS 100 Hz etc.
The battery release button I do not like. Hard to put a longer battery on it.
Great review, that volume control issue is a cluster, thanks for your efforts VK4LKG
I have a Alinco DJ-MD5X, Each Zones can be use for different Repeaters in New York City,
I agree with the volume control gripe, but it is something I can see "A" sense to. I have accidentally turned the volume up on a knob quite a few times, then blown my ear out when someone calls. I know this is all on me, and not something the radio should try to solve. I think someone thought this is the solution to that problem though.
Hi, I collect Yaesus HTs, I now have 50 of them, all different models. The FT70 is no direct comparison to the FT60, this latter one should rather be compared to the FT65 (which is almost a rebadged Baofeng with better RX). If it weren't for collection purposes, I woultn't get an FT70, but the FT1XD which has larger range for RX. My preferred HT anyway, is the VX6, which transmits even in Airband and Broadcast, and has the concentric knobs as it should be: volume and frequency. 73!!
I got one with mars/cap mod for 240 last year. First "real" Ht I owned as new ham.
I was just about to purchase this radio. Lol. And I didn't even click on this vid on purpose. Which yaesu should I get? I wanted a triband but yes a bit outdated. Any thoughts on wouxan?
Thanks
I like Wouxun radios and own several. They make good stuff. As for Yaesu tri-bands, have you looked at the VX-6R?.
@@KS6DAY yes. Vx 6r, that's the tri band I was referring to, I hear it's great also. Just seems "old-ish" and I'm willing to spend that much on GOOD radio but...
Well now I'm looking at the KG-UV9PX any experience with this by any chance ?
@@Jimbo_Conn I reviewed a KG-UV9P in this video - ua-cam.com/video/T0ZBvBZkjZI/v-deo.htmlsi=3--6OmGdz3T2e3nW . They are basically the same radio with the most fundamental difference being the dark display option on the KG-UV9PX. They are both very good radios.
I don't understand why the can't add the FM broadcast band. How hard would that be? Its right next to air band. I also noticed Yaesu doesn't care about our comments. I have tried writing their support and they ignore me.
Or why no AM for the military air band?
@@news_internationale2035my ft70 can do am for the air bands
First thing I learned about the ham community, someone is bound to complain about anything that is different from what they have learned, and will rather complain than learn to adapt to new systems, software, or innovations.
ADMS software works great, RTFM, and follow the directions exactly, and it's fine. Do it in the wrong, and it doesn't work. Funny how that is, it's almost like you actually need to follow the directions!
The volume ctl, I see both an advantage, and disadvantage. It's nice to know that it's loud, and there is no need to keep checking to see if the volume has been bumped down. In the end, I think the assurance it stays where set outweighs the inconvenience of the 2-step process.
Only negs I have ever encountered, short battery life,
Gotta change volume on my 70. Hold my beer. 🤷♂️🤦♂️
firmware update. Give a choice for it to do volume normally (not memories, channel) and press the side button labelled VOL I guess and turn knob for the channel, memories. It will only do one thing without a side button press but have the choice, just firmware and another thing in the menu options. I would have as volume normally, more useful as you say.
Yes. A simple firmware update allowing you to toggle the control function between volume and channel control would solve the problem quite well. But I doubt they will ever do it because they already imprinted "VOL" on the button and for it to do any function other than that would be to admit they put out a bad design. Institutional arrogance just won't permit that.
So glad I watched this, who at Yaesu is purposefully making things OVER complicated?? And inconsistent…same with how you access wires x with FT3, 5, 100, 200 , 400 and now 300 & 500…all different …ridiculous….the instructions are 63 pages!
FT-60R can not be charged from Ext. DC socket directly so need to be the cradle in box. FT-70DR has this capability so no cradle needed in basic setup.
You are right …the volume ctrl solution is “not good”, …”not smart”, …well IT IS STUPID! 😉
New models can!No cradle is supplied.
@@petrok1rp254Something you get used to, mate.
It needed :
3500mAh battery
Drop in Desktop Charger.
Bigger audio Speaker.
And a flat PTT button.
That's the reason many hams buy Anytone and baofeng ht's.
I will buy this radio specifically for the clunky volume control. Thing is, I am paragliding and at takeoff happened that the knob of my Baofeng turned and I ended up without radio. If I can find out that the locking option also turns off the effect of the knob, I am all conviced❤
I'm flummoxed by this thing, I just got it today. Using the Yeasu-provided CPS, and the pidgin "English" manual, I cannot see how to scan memory banks. In the software, I can tick a box and assign a channel to a bank. Fine. Now, how do I scan those banks??? No way I can find. Also the terminology is completely illogical and inconsistent. The "Programmed MEMORY Scans" (save up to 50!) are not channel or bank scans - the parameters they take are start and end FREQUENCY! Mr. Yeasu I do not wish to scan frequency ranges, I wish to scan banks of channels I have set up. I'm not ready to dump it yet, but if this thing is as bad as it seems now, it ain't going to last long!
I ran into the same problem with banks and was unable to get them working properly until I acquired the RT Systems programming software. After that I was able to properly set up the memory banks for scanning.
I bought this radio and am not impressed. I don't like the volume control and the non-standard keypad layout. YSF and Wires-X is confusing. DMR works for me.
I haven't decided if I'm keeping the radio, or selling it on eBay.
Bad engineering with any recent model of anything is prevalent. It isn't just with radios. During the past 3 years engineering design on so many products have become so poor you have to wonder if the people who are designing this equipment actually USE the equipment? ANY amateur radio operator would have had a problem with the volume control within 5 sec, so I think the answer is no.
I think we have a bunch of rookie designers who can engineer functions into equipment but have absolutely no experience with UI. One car manufacturer decided to put the turn signal switch on a steering while, which obviously rotates! So when you're in a turn and want to hit the blinker, good luck with that. Oh, and there are no detents for the buttons, so while driving, you're moving your finger around the steering wheel pressing and pressing until you finally find the right spot, oh and you have to push that button hard. After you get it on you find out you accidentally hit the right instead of the left blinker. How the hell did this get by any type of quality assurance control, or were they laid off? Probably laid off to reduce costs.
My TV just got an update. I now have to go through many screens and menus (with delays) to go from my streaming device to the tuner instead just pressing the source button followed by a simple selection, which I've done for years. Really??? But the list goes on.
Hi I have the yaesu ft 70d I have a 2000 mah battery and a plug in Mike with case I love my 70d
Yeah Yaesu really dropped the ball on the 70d!
I am sure glad I ran across this review...thinking about buying FT70 but think I'll pass. I have three Yaesu radios so also like the brand
FT70.HORRIBLE way of manage volume one of most important fast adjustments in radio needs. ONLY REASON I SOLD MINE
Looks like they didn't learn their lesson from the VX-8.....have to change volume by holding a button while turning the knob.
Is the FT5 the same way?
Still can't decide ft-60 or vx-6r.
Have both and think the 60 is a better value unless you need it to be waterproof.
If you buy after market batteries for the 70 off Amazon they will not work with the yaesu charger
Yeah, that's a deal breaker for me about the volume control on the FT70.
Anyway I like my 70 as it has good selectivity, good sensitivity and even the satellite operation is possible with proper setup of radio. Nice feature is C4FM. Using the VW mode in AMBE+2 with voice code of 4.4 kbps, error correction code of 2.8 kbps gives great voice quality. I still have my trusty FT-60R but I like 70 too a lot. (And yes, I purchased the cradle additionally too, 😎)
Good luck. Petr
Premise is wrong: The 70 is not considered an "upgraded" 60.
Heard about this soon after its release...radio from hell ..