Wonderful segment with great business insight! Relaunching with an updated Polerouter on Ed Sheeran's wrist would be the biggest bang imaginable, but I take the point that given PE timetable and capital constraints, this risks a botched debut with adverse consequences for the brand. Wishing UG the best whatever path they pursue!
Just wanted to say that your understanding of how businesses are run is impressive! Everything you said makes sense and is applicable to any type of business if it is to succeed. In today's world,the cost of running or increasing the worth of a business can change at the drop of a hat(esp. if not all wisdom is taken into consideration at the beginning of the process). There will always be a certain amount of risk involved, but it's the wise one who chooses to forgo the risk. Is this typical of all watch brands?
Very kind of you. 😊 Don't know - I think generally the bigger they get, the more risk averse they are likely to be. You protect what you have and don't need to take as many chances to stay in the game...
Yet another well-thought-out, clearly articulated, grounded video. Thank you once again for your words of wisdom, maestro! I truly enjoy watching every one of your videos!
The best explanation I’ve heard ever heard for how p.e. firms operate. Thank you. And the best explanation for how that translates to what we see from the brand owners. Fascinating stuff!
Five years for a new watch in 2027 ? Who says that Georg Kern hadn't been thinking about this for some time and had already taken the necessary steps ? Thank you for your analysis; great channel !
Thanks - Yeah. I don't see a company dedicating to resources to a project where you haven't even acquired the company yet. But maybe they have something going that they could retool. You never know. Cheers 😊
When I have to write notes, pause and remind and take more notes, it’s not only entertaining but educational! Thank you for sharing your thoughts - enjoy watching your videos immensely. Look forward to more great content 😊
Brilliant analysis. I’ve been in executive management for more then 15 years and I agree 100%. The only thing I would add is that I think the pole router will be the second or third watch to be launched. They can’t risk the first few launches not doing well.
Awesome and enlightening. There's usually a reason why things work out the way they do, especially in the horological world, but its rare to have a business explanation about who benefits and who pays and why its very much about following the dollars. Thanks for this welcome discussion that enables us to appreciate the watch world with both eyes open!
Glad you enjoyed it. I just try to do videos with angles that I find interesting - and I'm happy that others find them worth their time as well . Cheers z😀😀
The B01 was designed to be completely modular for ease of servicing and development of modules that wouldn’t just be stacked ontop a base movement but the poor release reception coupled with fiscal changes has meant that the potential of the b01 range was never realized. This purchase of UG could be an opportunity to invest a little bit into a UG specific modular to the B01 offering say a chrono with a cool moonphase complication, something currently trending IMO without current industry sales data in front of me, that would elevate and legitimize a UG offering without too much upfront investment.
I don't often comment, but this is an excellent video. I learned a lot and walked away with a lot of new and interesting insights. I feel this is something that really lacks in watch media generally: no one is really looking the commercial/business aspects of the industry and using that information to inform predictions or analysis of new watch releases. I think you've hit a real sweet spot here. I'm tired of watching the same "watch review" or "new releases" style content. I'd love to see more of this, if that's feasible? I'm reminded of an old Levi's commercial tag-line: "When the world zigs, zag."
Thank you. I'm trying to do my own thing. I do reviews every now and again, but it's not the core of my content. For me it's the why, the consumer, the market piece that I really like to dive into and then just sometimes watches that set me off thinking in some direction or other. Hope you choose to stick around 😀😀
Very interesting, I had not considered the importance of PE and Breitling going public, etc. About developing new movements, perhaps Breitling already have some spectacular new movement in the works, and they just decided that UG would be the perfect brand name to launch it under. To elevate the prestige of the movement higher than the Breitling name likely would have allowed.
You are one of my favorite watch channel on UA-cam. Thank you for your smart and insightful views on this superficial and unimportant hobby that watch collecting is. I’m 53 , I have been interested in watches since I was 17… UG is only famous for the bicompax , tricompax and polerouter…many models iteration with no clear icon. I don’t think the new wealthy generation have any wet dreams about that brand. I may be wrong but i wouldn’t bet on a successful commercial relaunch of the UG in this market. Off course personally I’m very much interested with the future of that great brand.
Yes, it would be extremely difficult for Breitling to develop and scale production of a new movement in 3-4 years, assuming they have not been planning this. But if we make a different assumption that Breitling has already been considering and strategically planning this going back several years, then it's possible they already have a new movement selected to use for these UG watches.
True... I just have trouble believing you throw internal resources at the meat and potatoes of development before you've inked a deal. I've never seen it in the firms I've been in, but there's always a first I suppose 😀😀
Breitling is a partner in Kenissi movements. (Tudor, Breitling, Chanel). I don’t know what Kenissi has in the pipeline, but it was probably a factor in the deal. Movements are expensive to develop, but the cost is a lot better divided by 3 companies.
thanks for the great content. My only view is they should use UG to go after Longines or entry level Omega. This new brand will have 0 cred to go after JLC or anytjing close to 15K price range. Also, Breitling will not risk their main brand by launching something above it. My 2 cents.
@@vespetkov it's a shame in a way cos the a lot of fans will be priced out but at least you can be assured that they will get exclusive movements and the quality will be excellent.
I look forward to watching how this will unfold and what the brand Universal Geneve, will mean to us watch nerds by 2027. Thank you for sharing your analysis.
Excellent analysis as always. I think a viable alternative would be to position UG as a dresssier counterpart to sporty Breitling, not necessarily above them in the portfolio. That could allow reuse of the same Breitling movements. It also avoids the risks related to cannibalising Breitling sales and damaging the Breitling brand. Plus the dressy segment is slightly less competitive - Tudor don't really play in that space and I'd see Longines as the main competitor rather than JLC. My money would be on a series of Limited Edition Polerouters initially because the execution risk is lower than a chrono. Plus some teasing and exhibition only chronos.
Great assessment! Thanks! Only, I dont necessarily share your optimism reg the success of the brand i.e. desirability. USP of an expensive 15k (by 2027 perhaps 18k) chronograph by UG is what again?!
Fair point. There's also a very real risk that nobody cares about UG outside of the most hardcore enthusiasts. If you can't get the regular consumer on board, they are dead in the water 😀😀
Great video and content, the most insightful, no BS, watch commentator on UA-cam. I envisage the first few being reissues of some of the past UG hits using their model ranges but as limited editions and likely more than one size option (most UG were small compared to Breitling).
Excellent analysis once again 👍 With normalised interest rates unlikely to fall in any significant way for the foreseeable future (if ever), possibly going even higher if geopolitical-generated inflation takes hold, you have to wonder if the PE growth/profit assumptions continue to hold water for Breitling/UG. Borrowing to invest on top of the $70m (already a very high price tag for the UG brand and design rights) what production output will UH have? Just divide the cost into output (= added cost per watch wrt depreciation, interest payments, etc). Perhaps the PE owners HAVE to go nearer PP or Adolf Lange in SRP to make the numbers work? 🤔 Also, I hear from various reliable contacts that discretionary spending is falling very noticeably across sectors and markets; luxury goods of all sorts (esp watches, bags, shoes), travel (esp airline load factors), automotive (esp EVs), bicycles (suddenly very slow). I can’t speak for other sectors, but I hear that even the ultra-rich are seen to be reducing spending overall - not the environment to relaunch UG and head for an IPO given what they’ll want to price UGs at and the PE firm’s desired valuation for the group. I have the feeling the timing of all this could well turn out to be a big mistake. We mustn’t forget that brand awareness of UG outside the cognoscenti of the watch community is achingly low. There’s a reason why Rolex is as desirable a brand producing in huge volumes. I can’t see PE spending on marketing in the $$$ needed to move the needle. But we shall see.
These videos don't make as many views but are amazing for people interested in the watch business not just the color of the dial. Although I do like pretty dials as well.
Great overview. 💯 hiring a well known and respected industry veteran would be a great first move. I’m sure the PE guys running the show wear Rolexes and APs; we’ll see what they can do. Breitling was already trying to undo their past 44mm obsession by offering smaller sizes. But their divers don’t even stack up with Tudors. Now that clout is such s big part of the luxury watch game this may be very difficult.
This is far more complicated that I had envisioned. Putting myself in their shoes it certainly would be a risk and I don't know if it will be worth it. Should be interesting to see how it plays out. Hope you have a great one Mike!
The Hodinkee interview with the CEO was interesting. George said they will all do new movements and start with the simpler automatic and release in 2026
YEs - it added some more insight and context for sure. I did get the feeling that there were quite a few things they hadn't committed to quite yet though - but were still bouncing around options😊
If would be disappointing if Breitling just threw a b01 into UG as it would not resonate well with the customers for essentially a Breitling movement in UG at higher prices. I suspect the investment into inhouse movement for UG would be unavoidable but starting with simple movement first with standard base movement. Then take advantage of the UC catalogue and expanding into complications once the revenue and proof of concept with base models is established in the market. I doubt it will be hand finished as it’s far more profitable to have them standardised on mass machine production, thereby proving the potential for future growth with scalable production methods. They will 100% lean towards this direction in order to maximise the evaluation. Regardless this is an interesting challenge as it’s basically the Tudor Rolex relationship in reverse. It would be much harder to reinvent into a pricier brand from a cheaper one.
I think you're onto something with a modified Breitling/Tudor movement but I wouldn't be surprised with a rebranded JLC movement. A JLC movement would tick the box for a high-end movement even featuring Cotes de Geneve for an ultra premium grade. This would cut the cost of creating a factory to house "In-house production," while simultaneously guaranteeing the quality every enthusiast expects. IMO.
It's a great challenge for Breitling. I agree with you. It's really difficult to develop a new movement (even on an old based calibre) Interesting to see what will be the possible supplier at the begining. Maybe something like Vaucher Manufacture which already design Ultra-Plat Microrotor movement (Seed VMF 5401). Wishing UG the best whatever path they pursue!
Your unmatched level of preparedness, industry knowledge and clear communication skills are only matched by your courage for reading AND replying to the comment section! 😂
Glad that a, likely, successful revitalizing of UG is happening. I'm personally hoping for a particular racing chronograph. This is a rare reference, and whether they will make a new reissue of it I sort of feel may be unlikely.. at least not for a long time. But, my veey favorite is the "Exotic Blue Nina" Compax. It just has the colors I like in that retro racing style with bold, yet somewhat muted, blue color block in the shape of a T. Yes, what we may get may take a long while and likely be very expensive.. but, in a way that's a good thing, for me, as it'll probably take just as long to save up $$$$$ for a UG chronograph reissue I really want.. IF it happens.
Start saving now and you may be able to afford one in 20 years (assuming no inflation) 😂😂 They are going to be charging entry to buy these things if they can get away with it 😀
This is indeed a very complex issue and there's uncertainty in this "revival" for Universal Geneve. But it kind of makes my mind run wild with the speculation: Will they release a chronograph? maybe a new polarauter? so many questions... Thank you for the video.
Breitling's chief designer already said that UG will be positioned higher than Breitling. Traditionally, UG was around JLC and Vacheron prices, so that is where the new watches will be priced. They will not use Breitling movements, but bespoke new movements. They already have a 10 year product plan. Limited and low volume production.
@@dannysimenauer5745 Yes, listen to ablogtowatch's podcast #101 - Sylvain Berneron is Breitling's head of design and gives much more detail about the acquisition.
Many thanks, all very fascinating - would love to know how much spare manufacturing capcity there is at Kenissi . . . It is possible for a small team, working in one large room, to perhaps meet the deadlines you suggest. However would need external manufacturing. Does Breitling have a (skunk works) team up to the task? Also looking on Crono24 - the UG product range is extensive and very diverse . . . where to start?
Very insightful and instructive. All makes sense. The hopes that some enthusiasts had look likely to disappear in a fire built by the PE money men. For the foreseeable future it looks like any UGs produced will be as rare as rocking horse s**te, and very expensive. At the moment I'm looking for a deal on an El Primero where I have a much better chance of success.
Great material, as always. Putting watches aside for a second, I am puzzled by the background of your home studio. What's up with a flight jet poster? Are you a fan of these in general or specifically of those flying for the Russian army? Cheers
This has been extremely insightful and eye opening to many I'm sure. Whilst I thoroughly enjoyed watching / listening, I can't help but feel that a small part of my romanticised world of horology just died a little. Not because of anything you said, but simply from the inevitable truth that comes with the transparency of business, finance, and P&L. We want the world of watches to thrive, live long, and prosper, but we subconsciously also pretend that Gepetto is whittling away in a sea of lathes and Guilloché, working tirelessly to produce the millions of watches sold on the market every year. 😅 P.S. Nice touch with the vinyl in the background. Is that a Top Gun edition?
Very interesting video. Here in the UK Breitling have started to open boutiques and I was wondering why. In my local shopping centre/mall, there are four jewellers selling decent watches all within 30 yards of each other. One mainly focuses on Omega, Tudor, Breitling and Longines. One focuses mainly on Rolex, Omega and IWC. One focuses mainly on Tudor, Longines and Seiko/Grand Seiko. One is the Breitling boutique. Yes, they cater to us watch enthusiasts but surely they need to attract other customers as well given the overheads of such locations. Are boutiques part of a PE strategy to create unique outlets for UG?
When I heard of the acquisition I was excited, as an enthusiast. UG 'back in the game'. Can't think of a brand rebirth with that kind of back-catalogue ever. It will be quite the tightrope, but I see this initially as being for 'enthusiast collectors' due to supply limitations: they are not going to make a lot of watches in say a 2.5 year timeframe and that will be at a price and probably more in line with say Girard Peregeux (which has its own ownership story of recent times). I agree they won't be Polerouters or Nina Rindts. That is where the volume will be and they can't 'spend' that yet. Make them limited initially and it's done. What they do as far as all-important movements, I got the popcorn on its way :) They'll need someone pretty savvy running the show.
Yes and no. The best UGs are already expensive. There's also a big pile of franken-UG's out there because people have so little insight into the brand. Having said that - broadly speaking, yes, I think prices could see an uptick. But buyer beware for sure.... Your thoughts?-😀😀
Mike what about the marketing investment with actors and stars for hype ?! I found the UG could used to close the gap of dressing watch away from the sport Breitling.
The big unknown is how far Breitling was advanced prior to purchasing UG. If I was managing this, no way would the recent purchase announcement be the starting point, they must in my mind be two or even three years into this project. You would sign an memorandum of understanding with holder of the IP first. This would allow the Breitling designers, engineering and marketing time to figure out and prepare a relaunch plan prior to the formal acquisition for a relatively small upfront cost. The purchase announcement would critically be the first step in marketing campaign associated with the relaunch strategy. This would mean they can now start talking openly to is existing distribution channels, and present their plan to add the UG brand, showing the prototypes of the watches that are coming to give them the confidence to invest is making room in their showrooms for another brand. So don't be surprised if we see a Universal Geneve watch produced in a Breitling factory on sale later this year. That gives them three years to grow the equity in the UG brand prior to going public. A separate UG design and production facility would be something the would sell as an investment opportunity and a justification for the IPO. It is vital that the IPO not just be seen as an opportunity for existing owners to exit.
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch ahah, that explains the pleasant & holistic... mece, pyramid, shareholder-aware, sequential presentation style. Your presentation is so very unique & thoughtful in this space Mike*! Would be happy to hear you talk about other topics outside of watches: "How to live a good life", how to be a reasonable person, other items, practices, or industries. I'm a subscribed fan. Cheers
I hope that Breitling, even if it has to wait a few years, say 2026/2027? will come out directly with a chronograph which is the Universal Geneve identity that we all know and appreciate. It will perhaps do so with a price around 23,000 euros in steel, placing it above and below the usual suspects at a price that will not allow you to think Breitling or Geneve, what do I choose between the two? the moment you decide to buy and spend 60,000,000 euros you already have a production plan and an almost ready movement from some former Universal team who has already been contacted some time ago.
As a Universal Genève aficionado, I cannot say that I look forward to its rebirth under these circumstances. Breitling is not in a position to be of great help as they have not produced anything desirable for many decades. Therefore, I would get a vintage Universal while they are still affordable.
I thought that Breitling was working on their own basic 3-hand date movement which might launch this year? That would complement the B01. I don't think that UG needs a UG" movement. As long as it is in-house to the Partner's Group then that's fine. It has to be one of Breitling's own movements, possibly even tweaked a little for UG. It definitely cannot be a Selita, ETA or even a Kenissi for that matter. I think it will be a Breitling movement tweaked slightly. You are right with how they are going to market this. It'll be with low production runs guaranteed to sell out, at very high prices promoted by the ultra rich influencers like John Mayer and Ed Sheeran. They'll just trickle out the hits like you say, and the Hodinkee crowds will gush. It'll be like the Lexus, to Breitling's high-end Toyotas.
But does Breitling want to go public? PE could spin this optimistic objective to build up expectations. As you brilliantly explained, PE will not pass a well-functioning company to the next ownership but the confidence (or illusion?) their overpriced asset is the next big thing.
Oh yes... PE companies don't hold on to their companies. The goal is always to get rid of the company. Sell to industry or go public. It's always the end game for PE... 😊
Great resume of PE that seems absolutely sound... But! I agree with you assumption that B have to position UG above them, but this is problematic for two reasons: 1) the mid-up tier inhabited by JLC, Blancpain, GO and possibly GS is struggling. Massively. Beyond halo product (Reverso, FF, Panodate) it's moribund. It's constrained by a ceiling of more aspirational, upper-tier brands (Patek etc) and perpetually squeezed from below by leviathans like Rolex or Omega. I don't see the volume in this sector either - Blancpain and JLC are pretty tiny, while their watches are a long way from oversubscribed. I see nothing that will likely change this. These watches are the worst for ROI: massive production costs from high quality watchmaking, huge R&D costs from movement development and then price constrained by market position. Swatch absorbs the costs across group, Richemont hopes and prays with JLC... Then 2) mid-upper tier UG squeezes and constrains mainstream Breitling. Perhaps the idea is Breitling drops to Tudor/Longines tier and UG offers Blancpain/JLC quality for Rolex money. But that is a big ask. And from scratch? Not even considering capital R&D, margins will be slim to non-existent. And volumes small - because UG, outside enthusiasts, is nothing as a brand. Recognition is zero. And launching UG to enthusiasts with Breitling/Kenissi movements would be catastrophic - they'd be roasted. Meanwhile, a lower tier Breitling would have to scale volume hugely to battle Longines, even Tudor or TAG and they just can't sell that volume. All these factors make the UG purchase a risky move for a Breitling IPO drive - fine if it stays a shell brand, but taken to production, an albatross. And this production thing is not insignificant - there just aren't the watchmakers. That said, I'm a watch fan. JLC and Blancpain offer the best watchmaking per buck and I love steel production high horology. So a UG with reworked movements and immaculate design? Bring it on! But I struggle to see the business case beyond 2021's hubris.
It's a guaranteed home run if they market it as super exclusive. As ArchieLuxury says, "watches are all about bullshit stories and snobbery". They have the bullshit stories with UG's storied history, and the high price and exclusive invite-only marketing will bring the snobbery... which brings the envy which brings the sales.
Breitling had their best year in 2023, up 24% to 94 million, but only an operational profit of 3 million...Ouch! maybe another reason why they bought UG hoping that this purchase will improve overall profit?
UG going to higher price point than B., fair point. B has to pay attention in keeping tight brand identity - collector identity- so UG model has to have UG refreshed caliber. Let's assume they go 4 a Cartier approach. Outsourcing caliber production to special collaboration, inhouse case & finishing dial. starting a yearly release of 3 series picking from the past. 1 manual. 1 bicompax, 1 diapason. 3 collaborations involving maybe Papi, or other mov celebrities or producer. 50 piece each. Limited series. Skyhigh. A mix btw initial Tesla strategy & Cartier 70ies. Than a moonswatch event before IPO. THE NINA. A 3 years prj to mass produce with kinesis. What u think. Wouldn't be great?
Not being weird, I promise, but when I look at your face, my peripheral vision renders the Batman toy on the left as a fairly large tarantula (for me, not good). So I just listen to you on headphones, missing the watch action. Still, I find your analysis interesting and unusual.
TWTW, why does Breitling have to make the watch unavailable, I mean limited? Pardon my rant, but you can't recoup $70 million investment by pissing offer customers and making the brand unattainable. The collectors are sick & tired of being treated like "Charlie Brown" with Lucy pulling away the football every time we want to buy a watch! We don't need another H. Moser (only 1,200 units) or Patek (only sell to billionaires). Why not take one model like the Pole Router or Paul Newman Daytona dial and make 5,000 units? Breitling could use off the shelf high-end ETA or Selita movements, or a Premier B01 movement to get the production line and sales moving. Collectors are getting tired of brands making a watch hard to get. I walked away from Rolex and A. Lange for its Odysseus being unattainable. I discovered UG from other channels introducing the brand well before Breitling bought UG. I am excited that the heritage models may be offered with modern movements. I would expect more from George Kerns, and I hope he does not follow your limited supply strategy and proves you completely wrong.
Because it's all about pumping the value of the firm in the short term. They paid 70 million. If you can sell 100 watches and prove that people would go mental for them, you get the same effect as having them available without having to pump out 5 or 10.000 watches from day one... Down the line it may change, but not at the start. That's my thinking at least. 😀😀
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch I understand your point. Seems to be similar to the A. Lange Odysseus. Only a select few got to buy at retail, and people are paying almost triple. Personally all the high end brands have this this strategy. However, they fail to take into account the law of unattended consequences. The many of us collectors will respond to UG being unavailable, and may take our anger on the Breitling brand. The outcome will backfire on Breitling. They jayve bc en drive me into the Apple watch camp...
Anything that goes in the back of those new watches will either be ETA coming to their senses or it will be kennisi and it’s much likely to be kennisi Breitling is now exposed to a downturn in the watch Market.
Let’s hope Breitling don’t « Furlan Marri » Universal Genève. That is make Xerox copies of « universally » appreciated vintage models (though owning the IP this time), slap in run of the mill movements requiring zero R&D, get the endorsement of a celebrity collector, maybe an interview with Ben Clymer in a posh location, pull the heartstrings of real UG enthusiasts to get them to reach for their Amex. Then sell the company to Frédéric Arnault in two years time for € 300 million.
What you are saying makes sense but I just can't imagine it working. The UG brand is dead as can be. Most enthusiasts have no idea what it's all about, let alone general public. And even if you "educate" the people, this brand has been dead for so long, I wouldn't associate the old UG with this new thing no matter what they do. If all it takes to convince people to buy into "heritage" is buying a name, a few celebrity releases and a one hit wonder l, geeez... has the hobby really gotten so shallow?!
You do have a relevant point. There is a lot resting on people warming to a brand that has been functionally dead for 30-40 years. Can they pull a Lange & Sohne and resurrect them? It's possible, but it's definitely not garuanteed at all. Lot's of ducks needed in that row.... 😊😊
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch You are not wrong, Lange is the closest thing to a successfully revived brand that was dead for long. But Lange had the great grandson of the founder and a story involving world politics... a much better reason for the gap in their CV than UG has. Lange didn't really have a chance, UG just didn't make "good enough" watches. Lange also came out guns blazing, invested 4 years towards making an insanely complicated movement, the L902.0 is no joke, with lots of deaign tributes to their old pocketbwatch movements and it was followed up by the Datograph not too long after that really put them on the map. I believe they also operate out of the "historically correct" buildings. All that goes much "deeper" than what will likely be done with UG, there is no "Datograph" in sight here...
It’s looking like it’s going to be a cash grab to me with a lot of celebrity endorsement . you do not throw millions of pounds to release a couple of vintage style dress watches, that part of a plan would be very credible but I don’t know how much money you could charge for those watches unless they are gold and all the sort of things we are already seeing to hype up the price of watches . when it comes to chronographs well breitling already they do those, I don’t see where the real custom is going to come from without cannibalising some of the business breitling already have. just how much custom is there ?
Layoffs ‘increase’ efficiency by having the remaining workers do unpaid overtime. In other words: slave labour. The increase in productivity and profit ends up in the pockets of the rich owners. Capitalism is efficient, it’s not fair. Your goal is to be the rich owner, not the slave labourer. Complaining or wishing for communism is stupid and a waste of your time.
Cvc is Absolute shit. I was working before in mgt Position cvc company ownd. Its Horror. No longterm. Everthing should be positiv roi 6month max 10minth. Process are not lean. Etc
What a pleasure to listen to an intelligent and well researched watch subject without the recent hype.
Humble thanks from me 😀
Wonderful segment with great business insight! Relaunching with an updated Polerouter on Ed Sheeran's wrist would be the biggest bang imaginable, but I take the point that given PE timetable and capital constraints, this risks a botched debut with adverse consequences for the brand. Wishing UG the best whatever path they pursue!
Just wanted to say that your understanding of how businesses are run is impressive! Everything you said makes sense and is applicable to any type of business if it is to succeed. In today's world,the cost of running or increasing the worth of a business can change at the drop of a hat(esp. if not all wisdom is taken into consideration at the beginning of the process). There will always be a certain amount of risk involved, but it's the wise one who chooses to forgo the risk. Is this typical of all watch brands?
Very kind of you. 😊
Don't know - I think generally the bigger they get, the more risk averse they are likely to be. You protect what you have and don't need to take as many chances to stay in the game...
I did 3 investment flips with various VC.s your summary is on the money ….if at times sounding like a Job pitch!😊
I fully understand your value as a consultant to companies. McKinsey and Company has 45,000 employees. All that is needed is just one person like you.
My problem is, I don't want to work the kind of hours consultants are expected to work. Armchair CEO all the way for me😂😂
Thanks for another cogent analysis and tutorial on private equity finance. You set the standard, Mike.
You are the man! Thanks a ton for the sign of appreciation. It really means a lot. Thanks!!!!! ❤️❤️❤️
Yet another well-thought-out, clearly articulated, grounded video. Thank you once again for your words of wisdom, maestro! I truly enjoy watching every one of your videos!
Humble thanks from me 😀😀
The best explanation I’ve heard ever heard for how p.e. firms operate. Thank you. And the best explanation for how that translates to what we see from the brand owners. Fascinating stuff!
Thanks - Happy you found it a worthy watch 😀
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch - thank you!
Five years for a new watch in 2027 ? Who says that Georg Kern hadn't been thinking about this for some time and had already taken the necessary steps ? Thank you for your analysis; great channel !
Thanks - Yeah. I don't see a company dedicating to resources to a project where you haven't even acquired the company yet. But maybe they have something going that they could retool. You never know.
Cheers 😊
When I have to write notes, pause and remind and take more notes, it’s not only entertaining but educational! Thank you for sharing your thoughts - enjoy watching your videos immensely. Look forward to more great content 😊
Lol 😂 Thank you - Sound like I'm giving a lecture, which is not necessarily a good thing 😂
You’re absolutely impressive sir
Don't know about that, but thanks nevertheless 😂😂
This was incredibly educational and insightful. Great work, Mike. Thanks!
My pleasure! 😀
Brilliant analysis. I’ve been in executive management for more then 15 years and I agree 100%. The only thing I would add is that I think the pole router will be the second or third watch to be launched.
They can’t risk the first few launches not doing well.
True on your point. They need to nail it from day one. A "code 11.59" will not cut it... 😀
Awesome and enlightening. There's usually a reason why things work out the way they do, especially in the horological world, but its rare to have a business explanation about who benefits and who pays and why its very much about following the dollars. Thanks for this welcome discussion that enables us to appreciate the watch world with both eyes open!
Glad you enjoyed it. I just try to do videos with angles that I find interesting - and I'm happy that others find them worth their time as well . Cheers z😀😀
The B01 was designed to be completely modular for ease of servicing and development of modules that wouldn’t just be stacked ontop a base movement but the poor release reception coupled with fiscal changes has meant that the potential of the b01 range was never realized. This purchase of UG could be an opportunity to invest a little bit into a UG specific modular to the B01 offering say a chrono with a cool moonphase complication, something currently trending IMO without current industry sales data in front of me, that would elevate and legitimize a UG offering without too much upfront investment.
True - I can see them taking that route - I do hope they thin it down. Even the modularised manual wind version is way thick... 😊
I don't often comment, but this is an excellent video. I learned a lot and walked away with a lot of new and interesting insights. I feel this is something that really lacks in watch media generally: no one is really looking the commercial/business aspects of the industry and using that information to inform predictions or analysis of new watch releases. I think you've hit a real sweet spot here.
I'm tired of watching the same "watch review" or "new releases" style content. I'd love to see more of this, if that's feasible?
I'm reminded of an old Levi's commercial tag-line: "When the world zigs, zag."
Thank you. I'm trying to do my own thing. I do reviews every now and again, but it's not the core of my content. For me it's the why, the consumer, the market piece that I really like to dive into and then just sometimes watches that set me off thinking in some direction or other. Hope you choose to stick around 😀😀
Thank you for this very informed video on the subject. I really enjoy the straight forward content on your channel.
Happy that you enjoyed it 😀😀
Wasn’t particularly interested in UG, but thanks for the quick overview of PE firms.
You're welcome 😀
Excellent and interesting analysis! 😊
Thank you! 😃
Very interesting, I had not considered the importance of PE and Breitling going public, etc. About developing new movements, perhaps Breitling already have some spectacular new movement in the works, and they just decided that UG would be the perfect brand name to launch it under. To elevate the prestige of the movement higher than the Breitling name likely would have allowed.
You are one of my favorite watch channel on UA-cam.
Thank you for your smart and insightful views on this superficial and unimportant hobby that watch collecting is.
I’m 53 , I have been interested in watches since I was 17…
UG is only famous for the bicompax , tricompax and polerouter…many models iteration with no clear icon.
I don’t think the new wealthy generation have any wet dreams about that brand.
I may be wrong but i wouldn’t bet on a successful commercial relaunch of the UG in this market.
Off course personally I’m very much interested with the future of that great brand.
Thank a ton. That's truly aprreciated. Especially since you've been in this hobby for much longer than me. Nods of apprecation from here 😀😀😀
Yes, it would be extremely difficult for Breitling to develop and scale production of a new movement in 3-4 years, assuming they have not been planning this. But if we make a different assumption that Breitling has already been considering and strategically planning this going back several years, then it's possible they already have a new movement selected to use for these UG watches.
True... I just have trouble believing you throw internal resources at the meat and potatoes of development before you've inked a deal. I've never seen it in the firms I've been in, but there's always a first I suppose 😀😀
Breitling is a partner in Kenissi movements. (Tudor, Breitling, Chanel). I don’t know what Kenissi has in the pipeline, but it was probably a factor in the deal. Movements are expensive to develop, but the cost is a lot better divided by 3 companies.
Precisely 😀
Excellent video and something we need more of.
I will try... 😀
thanks for the great content. My only view is they should use UG to go after Longines or entry level Omega. This new brand will have 0 cred to go after JLC or anytjing close to 15K price range. Also, Breitling will not risk their main brand by launching something above it. My 2 cents.
Referring to where the brand ultimately settles. Sure, they should launch a limited edition in the 10-15K range at first just to flex, but then...
That's what I thought might happen too. Making UG a high end brand again would cost a lot and take much time.
Well unfortunately, you're wrong. Breitling has already confirmed that UG will sit above Breitling and sit around JLC to Vacheron prices.
@@A.T.148-Scot-HK Had no idea. Good luck to them. Weird they needed to buy an empty shell to compete there but ok
@@vespetkov it's a shame in a way cos the a lot of fans will be priced out but at least you can be assured that they will get exclusive movements and the quality will be excellent.
What a man.
Tell me wife that... 😂😂
Absolutely outstanding video. I plan to send this to marketing execs wishing to understand the mechanics of private equity 🍻
Lol. Thanks. I think... 😂😂
dude, your stuff is fantastic.@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
Ahh the question I have been hoping you'd address!
Hopefully I answered in a way that wasn't completely bananas... 😂😂
I look forward to watching how this will unfold and what the brand Universal Geneve, will mean to us watch nerds by 2027. Thank you for sharing your analysis.
Thanks for watching 😀
Excellent analysis as always.
I think a viable alternative would be to position UG as a dresssier counterpart to sporty Breitling, not necessarily above them in the portfolio. That could allow reuse of the same Breitling movements. It also avoids the risks related to cannibalising Breitling sales and damaging the Breitling brand. Plus the dressy segment is slightly less competitive - Tudor don't really play in that space and I'd see Longines as the main competitor rather than JLC.
My money would be on a series of Limited Edition Polerouters initially because the execution risk is lower than a chrono. Plus some teasing and exhibition only chronos.
I like the idea of a parrallel brand. That would be doable I think with the right assortment. We'll see eventually... 😀😀 See you around 👍
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch keep up the great work with your channel! Superb analysis! Unique on youtube!
Very well thought & logical video on UG's future in short term. In the end it is still a business, maybe collectors were expecting too much.
Possibly - We'll see 😀😀
Great assessment! Thanks! Only, I dont necessarily share your optimism reg the success of the brand i.e. desirability. USP of an expensive 15k (by 2027 perhaps 18k) chronograph by UG is what again?!
Fair point. There's also a very real risk that nobody cares about UG outside of the most hardcore enthusiasts. If you can't get the regular consumer on board, they are dead in the water 😀😀
Great video and content, the most insightful, no BS, watch commentator on UA-cam. I envisage the first few being reissues of some of the past UG hits using their model ranges but as limited editions and likely more than one size option (most UG were small compared to Breitling).
Thank you 😊😊
Excellent analysis once again 👍
With normalised interest rates unlikely to fall in any significant way for the foreseeable future (if ever), possibly going even higher if geopolitical-generated inflation takes hold, you have to wonder if the PE growth/profit assumptions continue to hold water for Breitling/UG. Borrowing to invest on top of the $70m (already a very high price tag for the UG brand and design rights) what production output will UH have? Just divide the cost into output (= added cost per watch wrt depreciation, interest payments, etc). Perhaps the PE owners HAVE to go nearer PP or Adolf Lange in SRP to make the numbers work? 🤔
Also, I hear from various reliable contacts that discretionary spending is falling very noticeably across sectors and markets; luxury goods of all sorts (esp watches, bags, shoes), travel (esp airline load factors), automotive (esp EVs), bicycles (suddenly very slow). I can’t speak for other sectors, but I hear that even the ultra-rich are seen to be reducing spending overall - not the environment to relaunch UG and head for an IPO given what they’ll want to price UGs at and the PE firm’s desired valuation for the group.
I have the feeling the timing of all this could well turn out to be a big mistake. We mustn’t forget that brand awareness of UG outside the cognoscenti of the watch community is achingly low. There’s a reason why Rolex is as desirable a brand producing in huge volumes. I can’t see PE spending on marketing in the $$$ needed to move the needle. But we shall see.
Stumbled across your channel & very impressed. You know your watches and clearly have a solid business acumen 👏👏
Thanks and thanks also for stopping by. 😀😀
Thanks for great,interesting and informative talk ✌️
Thanks - you're welcome also 😀😀
These videos don't make as many views but are amazing for people interested in the watch business not just the color of the dial. Although I do like pretty dials as well.
Great overview. 💯 hiring a well known and respected industry veteran would be a great first move. I’m sure the PE guys running the show wear Rolexes and APs; we’ll see what they can do. Breitling was already trying to undo their past 44mm obsession by offering smaller sizes. But their divers don’t even stack up with Tudors.
Now that clout is such s big part of the luxury watch game this may be very difficult.
Thanks - As for B vs T. Agree. Breitling is too expensive for what you get compared to Tudor. T wins the value game any day of the week 😀😀
This is far more complicated that I had envisioned. Putting myself in their shoes it certainly would be a risk and I don't know if it will be worth it. Should be interesting to see how it plays out. Hope you have a great one Mike!
I like how you understand the business and talk about it in such an eloquent manner. Insta-sub!
Just find your channel. Fantastic!
Glad you enjoy it! 😃
impressive… very very impressive
THX
Impressive!
Might this be a better way of creating a "Grand Seiko" without calling it "Grand Breitling" :p
Lol. Grand breitling... 😂😂
The Hodinkee interview with the CEO was interesting. George said they will all do new movements and start with the simpler automatic and release in 2026
YEs - it added some more insight and context for sure. I did get the feeling that there were quite a few things they hadn't committed to quite yet though - but were still bouncing around options😊
If would be disappointing if Breitling just threw a b01 into UG as it would not resonate well with the customers for essentially a Breitling movement in UG at higher prices.
I suspect the investment into inhouse movement for UG would be unavoidable but starting with simple movement first with standard base movement.
Then take advantage of the UC catalogue and expanding into complications once the revenue and proof of concept with base models is established in the market.
I doubt it will be hand finished as it’s far more profitable to have them standardised on mass machine production, thereby proving the potential for future growth with scalable production methods.
They will 100% lean towards this direction in order to maximise the evaluation.
Regardless this is an interesting challenge as it’s basically the Tudor Rolex relationship in reverse.
It would be much harder to reinvent into a pricier brand from a cheaper one.
I think you're onto something with a modified Breitling/Tudor movement but I wouldn't be surprised with a rebranded JLC movement. A JLC movement would tick the box for a high-end movement even featuring Cotes de Geneve for an ultra premium grade. This would cut the cost of creating a factory to house "In-house production," while simultaneously guaranteeing the quality every enthusiast expects. IMO.
Didn't think of the JLC angle. If they're willing to deliver, then yes. Wonder if that's feasible ... .😀😀
Thank you for this outstanding presentation
Glad you enjoyed it! 😀
"I suggest you read books from both sides" - that is always a very wise suggestion.
Always 😊😊
Another great video TWTW!
Thanks! 😄
It's a great challenge for Breitling.
I agree with you. It's really difficult to develop a new movement (even on an old based calibre)
Interesting to see what will be the possible supplier at the begining.
Maybe something like Vaucher Manufacture which already design Ultra-Plat Microrotor movement (Seed VMF 5401).
Wishing UG the best whatever path they pursue!
Your unmatched level of preparedness, industry knowledge and clear communication skills are only matched by your courage for reading AND replying to the comment section! 😂
Great video and thoughtful insight!
Big thanks from me 😀😀
Glad that a, likely, successful revitalizing of UG is happening. I'm personally hoping for a particular racing chronograph.
This is a rare reference, and whether they will make a new reissue of it I sort of feel may be unlikely.. at least not for a long time. But, my veey favorite is the "Exotic Blue Nina" Compax. It just has the colors I like in that retro racing style with bold, yet somewhat muted, blue color block in the shape of a T.
Yes, what we may get may take a long while and likely be very expensive.. but, in a way that's a good thing, for me, as it'll probably take just as long to save up $$$$$ for a UG chronograph reissue I really want.. IF it happens.
Start saving now and you may be able to afford one in 20 years (assuming no inflation) 😂😂 They are going to be charging entry to buy these things if they can get away with it 😀
This is indeed a very complex issue and there's uncertainty in this "revival" for Universal Geneve. But it kind of makes my mind run wild with the speculation: Will they release a chronograph? maybe a new polarauter? so many questions...
Thank you for the video.
You're welcome 😀
Breitling's chief designer already said that UG will be positioned higher than Breitling. Traditionally, UG was around JLC and Vacheron prices, so that is where the new watches will be priced.
They will not use Breitling movements, but bespoke new movements. They already have a 10 year product plan.
Limited and low volume production.
I don't doubt what you are saying, and can this be found in the public domain anywhere? I would like read more. Let me know where to find the info.
@@dannysimenauer5745 Yes, listen to ablogtowatch's podcast #101 - Sylvain Berneron is Breitling's head of design and gives much more detail about the acquisition.
Many thanks, all very fascinating - would love to know how much spare manufacturing capcity there is at Kenissi . . .
It is possible for a small team, working in one large room, to perhaps meet the deadlines you suggest.
However would need external manufacturing. Does Breitling have a (skunk works) team up to the task?
Also looking on Crono24 - the UG product range is extensive and very diverse . . . where to start?
If they have someone ready to get started it definitely gives them a head start...
Well done.
Thank you 😀
Very insightful and instructive. All makes sense. The hopes that some enthusiasts had look likely to disappear in a fire built by the PE money men. For the foreseeable future it looks like any UGs produced will be as rare as rocking horse s**te, and very expensive. At the moment I'm looking for a deal on an El Primero where I have a much better chance of success.
El primero - Whether new or vintage, they're mega cool 😀😀
If I was UG I would start with a micro rotor release and use the Vaucher movement
Great material, as always. Putting watches aside for a second, I am puzzled by the background of your home studio. What's up with a flight jet poster? Are you a fan of these in general or specifically of those flying for the Russian army? Cheers
They are F14 tomcats. It’s a poster from Top Gun (The first movie). I just like the movie 😀
This has been extremely insightful and eye opening to many I'm sure.
Whilst I thoroughly enjoyed watching / listening, I can't help but feel that a small part of my romanticised world of horology just died a little.
Not because of anything you said, but simply from the inevitable truth that comes with the transparency of business, finance, and P&L.
We want the world of watches to thrive, live long, and prosper, but we subconsciously also pretend that Gepetto is whittling away in a sea of lathes and Guilloché, working tirelessly to produce the millions of watches sold on the market every year. 😅
P.S. Nice touch with the vinyl in the background. Is that a Top Gun edition?
Thanks - and yeah. It gets kind of sad when you consider how business gets done. It's like hot dogs. Nobody should know how those things get made 😂😂
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch 💯💯💯🤣🤣🤣
Very interesting video. Here in the UK Breitling have started to open boutiques and I was wondering why. In my local shopping centre/mall, there are four jewellers selling decent watches all within 30 yards of each other. One mainly focuses on Omega, Tudor, Breitling and Longines. One focuses mainly on Rolex, Omega and IWC. One focuses mainly on Tudor, Longines and Seiko/Grand Seiko. One is the Breitling boutique. Yes, they cater to us watch enthusiasts but surely they need to attract other customers as well given the overheads of such locations. Are boutiques part of a PE strategy to create unique outlets for UG?
Thanks for sharing 😊
When I heard of the acquisition I was excited, as an enthusiast. UG 'back in the game'. Can't think of a brand rebirth with that kind of back-catalogue ever. It will be quite the tightrope, but I see this initially as being for 'enthusiast collectors' due to supply limitations: they are not going to make a lot of watches in say a 2.5 year timeframe and that will be at a price and probably more in line with say Girard Peregeux (which has its own ownership story of recent times). I agree they won't be Polerouters or Nina Rindts. That is where the volume will be and they can't 'spend' that yet. Make them limited initially and it's done. What they do as far as all-important movements, I got the popcorn on its way :) They'll need someone pretty savvy running the show.
What great and logical well thought true video
Thanks 😊
do you think it will increase the vintage UG prices ? Not speaking Pole routeur
Maybe, but there are so many Frankens out there after the Clymer/Hodinkee hype.
Yes and no. The best UGs are already expensive. There's also a big pile of franken-UG's out there because people have so little insight into the brand. Having said that - broadly speaking, yes, I think prices could see an uptick. But buyer beware for sure.... Your thoughts?-😀😀
Whatever they come up with it has to be desirable……. Nothing more, nothing less
That is true. Succinct and true. 😀
Mike what about the marketing investment with actors and stars for hype ?! I found the UG could used to close the gap of dressing watch away from the sport Breitling.
Excellent!
Accent grave makes an ehh sound as in “get” or “bet” in Genève
The second I start a youtube channel about grammar and pronounciation I'll be sure to remember that. Likely not before that. 😂
The big unknown is how far Breitling was advanced prior to purchasing UG. If I was managing this, no way would the recent purchase announcement be the starting point, they must in my mind be two or even three years into this project. You would sign an memorandum of understanding with holder of the IP first. This would allow the Breitling designers, engineering and marketing time to figure out and prepare a relaunch plan prior to the formal acquisition for a relatively small upfront cost. The purchase announcement would critically be the first step in marketing campaign associated with the relaunch strategy. This would mean they can now start talking openly to is existing distribution channels, and present their plan to add the UG brand, showing the prototypes of the watches that are coming to give them the confidence to invest is making room in their showrooms for another brand. So don't be surprised if we see a Universal Geneve watch produced in a Breitling factory on sale later this year. That gives them three years to grow the equity in the UG brand prior to going public.
A separate UG design and production facility would be something the would sell as an investment opportunity and a justification for the IPO. It is vital that the IPO not just be seen as an opportunity for existing owners to exit.
I'm curious to know Mark's business background
(Edit) I meant Mike*, not Mark- unless Mike so brazenly decides to change his name. Apologies 🙏🏼
Consulting, tech, pharma. Occasionally C-suite 😀😀👍
But that's me - Mike. Not Mark. 😉😉😉😂😂
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch ahah, that explains the pleasant & holistic... mece, pyramid, shareholder-aware, sequential presentation style.
Your presentation is so very unique & thoughtful in this space Mike*!
Would be happy to hear you talk about other topics outside of watches: "How to live a good life", how to be a reasonable person, other items, practices, or industries.
I'm a subscribed fan.
Cheers
Didn’t they buy also mechanism details, intellectual property, etc from UG? They could use those also.
Yes - All the intellectual property "A desk with a pile of paper with drawings on them". 😀
Would love to have a UG Nina Rindt 🙂
I hope that Breitling, even if it has to wait a few years, say 2026/2027? will come out directly with a chronograph which is the Universal Geneve identity that we all know and appreciate. It will perhaps do so with a price around 23,000 euros in steel, placing it above and below the usual suspects at a price that will not allow you to think Breitling or Geneve, what do I choose between the two? the moment you decide to buy and spend 60,000,000 euros you already have a production plan and an almost ready movement from some former Universal team who has already been contacted some time ago.
What’s a business lesson!!
Glad you found it worth watching 😀😀
As a Universal Genève aficionado, I cannot say that I look forward to its rebirth under these circumstances. Breitling is not in a position to be of great help as they have not produced anything desirable for many decades. Therefore, I would get a vintage Universal while they are still affordable.
I want the white shadow micro rotor reissue.
I thought that Breitling was working on their own basic 3-hand date movement which might launch this year? That would complement the B01. I don't think that UG needs a UG" movement. As long as it is in-house to the Partner's Group then that's fine. It has to be one of Breitling's own movements, possibly even tweaked a little for UG. It definitely cannot be a Selita, ETA or even a Kenissi for that matter. I think it will be a Breitling movement tweaked slightly.
You are right with how they are going to market this. It'll be with low production runs guaranteed to sell out, at very high prices promoted by the ultra rich influencers like John Mayer and Ed Sheeran. They'll just trickle out the hits like you say, and the Hodinkee crowds will gush. It'll be like the Lexus, to Breitling's high-end Toyotas.
But does Breitling want to go public? PE could spin this optimistic objective to build up expectations. As you brilliantly explained, PE will not pass a well-functioning company to the next ownership but the confidence (or illusion?) their overpriced asset is the next big thing.
Oh yes... PE companies don't hold on to their companies. The goal is always to get rid of the company. Sell to industry or go public. It's always the end game for PE... 😊
Great resume of PE that seems absolutely sound... But! I agree with you assumption that B have to position UG above them, but this is problematic for two reasons: 1) the mid-up tier inhabited by JLC, Blancpain, GO and possibly GS is struggling. Massively. Beyond halo product (Reverso, FF, Panodate) it's moribund. It's constrained by a ceiling of more aspirational, upper-tier brands (Patek etc) and perpetually squeezed from below by leviathans like Rolex or Omega. I don't see the volume in this sector either - Blancpain and JLC are pretty tiny, while their watches are a long way from oversubscribed. I see nothing that will likely change this. These watches are the worst for ROI: massive production costs from high quality watchmaking, huge R&D costs from movement development and then price constrained by market position. Swatch absorbs the costs across group, Richemont hopes and prays with JLC...
Then 2) mid-upper tier UG squeezes and constrains mainstream Breitling. Perhaps the idea is Breitling drops to Tudor/Longines tier and UG offers Blancpain/JLC quality for Rolex money. But that is a big ask. And from scratch? Not even considering capital R&D, margins will be slim to non-existent. And volumes small - because UG, outside enthusiasts, is nothing as a brand. Recognition is zero. And launching UG to enthusiasts with Breitling/Kenissi movements would be catastrophic - they'd be roasted. Meanwhile, a lower tier Breitling would have to scale volume hugely to battle Longines, even Tudor or TAG and they just can't sell that volume. All these factors make the UG purchase a risky move for a Breitling IPO drive - fine if it stays a shell brand, but taken to production, an albatross. And this production thing is not insignificant - there just aren't the watchmakers.
That said, I'm a watch fan. JLC and Blancpain offer the best watchmaking per buck and I love steel production high horology. So a UG with reworked movements and immaculate design? Bring it on! But I struggle to see the business case beyond 2021's hubris.
Breitling is certainly taking a big risk-hopefully it’ll pay off.
It's a guaranteed home run if they market it as super exclusive. As ArchieLuxury says, "watches are all about bullshit stories and snobbery". They have the bullshit stories with UG's storied history, and the high price and exclusive invite-only marketing will bring the snobbery... which brings the envy which brings the sales.
Fingers crossed
So, a Tudor to Rolex equivalent as it pertains to Breitling? Perhaps a poor example, as it appears that it's a high end, new UG...
Yessir. 😀
Breitling had their best year in 2023, up 24% to 94 million, but only an operational profit of 3 million...Ouch! maybe another reason why they bought UG hoping that this purchase will improve overall profit?
Like I said - Private equity doesn't necessarily care about profitable growth, just growth... 😊
true! @@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
Hoping for an honest revival 🤞
me too 😀😀
UG going to higher price point than B., fair point. B has to pay attention in keeping tight brand identity - collector identity- so UG model has to have UG refreshed caliber. Let's assume they go 4 a Cartier approach. Outsourcing caliber production to special collaboration, inhouse case & finishing dial. starting a yearly release of 3 series picking from the past. 1 manual. 1 bicompax, 1 diapason. 3 collaborations involving maybe Papi, or other mov celebrities or producer. 50 piece each. Limited series. Skyhigh. A mix btw initial Tesla strategy & Cartier 70ies. Than a moonswatch event before IPO. THE NINA. A 3 years prj to mass produce with kinesis. What u think. Wouldn't be great?
I don't know. They might have missed the window. I don't think anyone is clamoring for UG. The market has moved on.
We'll see, I suppose
Breitling have to say thank you to Hong Kong.
Can it be any worse than modern day Angelus or Chronoswiss 😁😆
Not being weird, I promise, but when I look at your face, my peripheral vision renders the Batman toy on the left as a fairly large tarantula (for me, not good). So I just listen to you on headphones, missing the watch action. Still, I find your analysis interesting and unusual.
I am worried Breitling will end up like my friennd john
TWTW, why does Breitling have to make the watch unavailable, I mean limited? Pardon my rant, but you can't recoup $70 million investment by pissing offer customers and making the brand unattainable. The collectors are sick & tired of being treated like "Charlie Brown" with Lucy pulling away the football every time we want to buy a watch! We don't need another H. Moser (only 1,200 units) or Patek (only sell to billionaires). Why not take one model like the Pole Router or Paul Newman Daytona dial and make 5,000 units? Breitling could use off the shelf high-end ETA or Selita movements, or a Premier B01 movement to get the production line and sales moving. Collectors are getting tired of brands making a watch hard to get. I walked away from Rolex and A. Lange for its Odysseus being unattainable. I discovered UG from other channels introducing the brand well before Breitling bought UG. I am excited that the heritage models may be offered with modern movements. I would expect more from George Kerns, and I hope he does not follow your limited supply strategy and proves you completely wrong.
Because it's all about pumping the value of the firm in the short term. They paid 70 million. If you can sell 100 watches and prove that people would go mental for them, you get the same effect as having them available without having to pump out 5 or 10.000 watches from day one... Down the line it may change, but not at the start. That's my thinking at least. 😀😀
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch I understand your point. Seems to be similar to the A. Lange Odysseus. Only a select few got to buy at retail, and people are paying almost triple. Personally all the high end brands have this this strategy. However, they fail to take into account the law of unattended consequences. The many of us collectors will respond to UG being unavailable, and may take our anger on the Breitling brand. The outcome will backfire on Breitling. They jayve bc en drive me into the Apple watch camp...
Anything that goes in the back of those new watches will either be ETA coming to their senses or it will be kennisi and it’s much likely to be kennisi Breitling is now exposed to a downturn in the watch Market.
Get used to the term Microtor defining UG’s success.
Let’s hope Breitling don’t « Furlan Marri » Universal Genève.
That is make Xerox copies of « universally » appreciated vintage models (though owning the IP this time), slap in run of the mill movements requiring zero R&D, get the endorsement of a celebrity collector, maybe an interview with Ben Clymer in a posh location, pull the heartstrings of real UG enthusiasts to get them to reach for their Amex.
Then sell the company to Frédéric Arnault in two years time for € 300 million.
What you are saying makes sense but I just can't imagine it working. The UG brand is dead as can be. Most enthusiasts have no idea what it's all about, let alone general public. And even if you "educate" the people, this brand has been dead for so long, I wouldn't associate the old UG with this new thing no matter what they do. If all it takes to convince people to buy into "heritage" is buying a name, a few celebrity releases and a one hit wonder l, geeez... has the hobby really gotten so shallow?!
You do have a relevant point. There is a lot resting on people warming to a brand that has been functionally dead for 30-40 years. Can they pull a Lange & Sohne and resurrect them? It's possible, but it's definitely not garuanteed at all.
Lot's of ducks needed in that row.... 😊😊
@@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch You are not wrong, Lange is the closest thing to a successfully revived brand that was dead for long. But Lange had the great grandson of the founder and a story involving world politics... a much better reason for the gap in their CV than UG has. Lange didn't really have a chance, UG just didn't make "good enough" watches. Lange also came out guns blazing, invested 4 years towards making an insanely complicated movement, the L902.0 is no joke, with lots of deaign tributes to their old pocketbwatch movements and it was followed up by the Datograph not too long after that really put them on the map. I believe they also operate out of the "historically correct" buildings. All that goes much "deeper" than what will likely be done with UG, there is no "Datograph" in sight here...
They won't hire you for advise now!! probably a money grab situation is more likely. Like the old dials for sure.
Lol 😂Probably not... 😀
It’s looking like it’s going to be a cash grab to me with a lot of celebrity endorsement . you do not throw millions of pounds to release a couple of vintage style dress watches, that part of a plan would be very credible but I don’t know how much money you could charge for those watches unless they are gold and all the sort of things we are already seeing to hype up the price of watches . when it comes to chronographs well breitling already they do those, I don’t see where the real custom is going to come from without cannibalising some of the business breitling already have. just how much custom is there ?
It's always about the money... 😀
Layoffs ‘increase’ efficiency by having the remaining workers do unpaid overtime. In other words: slave labour. The increase in productivity and profit ends up in the pockets of the rich owners. Capitalism is efficient, it’s not fair. Your goal is to be the rich owner, not the slave labourer. Complaining or wishing for communism is stupid and a waste of your time.
Nobodies complaing (not me at least) 😀😀
First comment!
Cvc is Absolute shit. I was working before in mgt Position cvc company ownd. Its Horror. No longterm. Everthing should be positiv roi 6month max 10minth. Process are not lean. Etc