huuuge upgrade...sad that it only came because of that letter....Alas I always wait for the first service pack to make the move to new versions, can't wait for that!
Phase overrides can also be accomplished with a clean type-naming convention and using the type-name to override. I believe filter overrides are higher on the override hierarchy than phases, which without looking at reference material, would likely come after object styles. Alternatively, You could also set up materials for existing. No?
That means you need different types for each phase though... On big projects, that means a lot of types! Indeed, view filter have higher priority than phases overrides and object styles.
@@bimpure I work on large projects, albeit from a structural. I assume the number of phases would be limited...to something like three or four depending on scope of work. I also assume the number of materials would be fairly limited. Maybe for architectural you would need 10-15 material types, me one filter for each. I’ve tried working without a type naming convention, and filtering items becomes the difficult part. My preference is to use the type name for almost everything. Not sure if you can filter type names in schedules yet, but it is a simple task to copy the parameter via dynamo into a shared parameter. I know you’re just covering new features, and it is a way to get from a-to-b. Just thought I would share how I might approach it. Thanks for the video. :) And yes; it is a lot of types...that’s what the search function in the drop-down is for! ;)
i don't think the architects criticism Autodesk for these small Enhancements, all these Enhancements are very basic (they are too far from "Mind Blowing") and they should be there 10 years ago
Hate to say this but I agree with you. Even after this 2022 update it is evident there are some basic features that revit still decides to overlook so they come back later and add them as improvements. Is autodesk running out of ideas?
I Can't get the Architectural template or any template ...! any help somewhere ? i went to the website and downloaded the us metric library but no template anywhere ...!
@@Ilikedahrice I don't remember it allowing me to extract, it just allows to install then you have nothing, or maybe I don't remember it's been like a month, what I miss are the family profiles, I work a lot with them to create stuff, I you happen to still have the file you used please share with me
@@waldrysmouss486 You can download the Revit Content Packs and extract the downloader itself. They will be in the folder/multiple folders but it is there. Might need Winrar or something like that.
@@Ilikedahrice OK, I will try it again cause I'm limited now. I don't even enjoy working at the moment, but if possible can I drop my email you email me the content pack you downloaded?
Honestly, was pretty stoked about the new release... but I think we have been so used to terrible releases that even slightly exceeding expectations seems like good news.
That’s revit, and I agree almost completely. I will say this; if you had to work with say, revit 2007 or 2008, you would be fairly disoriented and surprised by how many improvements they’ve made. In the end, they Are very Slow to make improvements or to fix quirks. I’m just happy I can use align to get my sections parallel!
I think that Revit is overkill for cad. Datacad and sketchup used together are much faster and easier and in the end it’s printed lines on paper of a pdf. How much trouble it takes to get there is your choice.
@@RubbinRobbin It really, really isn't. Ask anyone who has used ArchiCAD. Meanwhile, there are half a dozen new BIM competitors coming down the road who will actually develop and improve their products.
@@henryglennon3864 Agree, but this Archicad 22, 23 & 24 although it is more flexible it is more complex to use than past version. Like they should've put more simplified settings in their dialogue settings and more graphical editing.
@@undo7711 Fair, but Revit has also been around years, has more resources to throw into development, and since so many good ideas have already been pioneered by Graphisoft, all Autodesk needs to do is rip them off. No innovation required.
@@henryglennon3864 yeah, the Revit is stagnant and Archicad became complex software to use. I think the advantage of learning Revit is there's so much video tutorial you can find here in ytube while Archicad barely has (some are not in english).
Multi-leader tag is great update...
tag by category in legends? sort materials by level? work with revit links without havig to close them?
Nice summary...thanks. You missed the big one for me...the ability to show only wall core in plan...
How do you plan to use this feature?
Mind...blown...
Thank you
huuuge upgrade...sad that it only came because of that letter....Alas I always wait for the first service pack to make the move to new versions, can't wait for that!
Awesome summary, Nicolas. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks!
Phese feature really helpfull thanks man.
i can't believe they have only just done the split schedule functionality
Phase overrides can also be accomplished with a clean type-naming convention and using the type-name to override. I believe filter overrides are higher on the override hierarchy than phases, which without looking at reference material, would likely come after object styles. Alternatively, You could also set up materials for existing. No?
That means you need different types for each phase though... On big projects, that means a lot of types! Indeed, view filter have higher priority than phases overrides and object styles.
@@bimpure I work on large projects, albeit from a structural.
I assume the number of phases would be limited...to something like three or four depending on scope of work.
I also assume the number of materials would be fairly limited. Maybe for architectural you would need 10-15 material types, me one filter for each.
I’ve tried working without a type naming convention, and filtering items becomes the difficult part. My preference is to use the type name for almost everything. Not sure if you can filter type names in schedules yet, but it is a simple task to copy the parameter via dynamo into a shared parameter.
I know you’re just covering new features, and it is a way to get from a-to-b. Just thought I would share how I might approach it.
Thanks for the video. :)
And yes; it is a lot of types...that’s what the search function in the drop-down is for! ;)
Gracias
What about Electrical and mechanical elements?
I have many problems in it
i don't think the architects criticism Autodesk for these small Enhancements, all these Enhancements are very basic (they are too far from "Mind Blowing") and they should be there 10 years ago
These tools are mind blowing because of the time they will help us save... but yeah, looking at the big picture, there is nothing revolutionary here.
120% agree! These "tiny" things should not be called "upgrade". Really really disappointing...
Hate to say this but I agree with you. Even after this 2022 update it is evident there are some basic features that revit still decides to overlook so they come back later and add them as improvements. Is autodesk running out of ideas?
I Can't get the Architectural template or any template ...! any help somewhere ? i went to the website and downloaded the us metric library but no template anywhere ...!
Its broken. What I did was extract the content pack and picked out the files I wanted.
@@Ilikedahrice I don't remember it allowing me to extract, it just allows to install then you have nothing, or maybe I don't remember it's been like a month, what I miss are the family profiles, I work a lot with them to create stuff, I you happen to still have the file you used please share with me
@@waldrysmouss486 You can download the Revit Content Packs and extract the downloader itself. They will be in the folder/multiple folders but it is there. Might need Winrar or something like that.
@@Ilikedahrice OK, I will try it again cause I'm limited now. I don't even enjoy working at the moment, but if possible can I drop my email you email me the content pack you downloaded?
Would be nice if they improved performance, any chance they have?
No....It's getting slower year by year...
Yeah. Bim 360
But you have to pay for that
thank's
PDF Export. Finally
There goes my dynamo rename in directory script...
wow they did not add anything relevant as usual. just little things that should be implemented from 10 years ago.
120% agree. No improvement!
Honestly, was pretty stoked about the new release... but I think we have been so used to terrible releases that even slightly exceeding expectations seems like good news.
That’s revit, and I agree almost completely.
I will say this; if you had to work with say, revit 2007 or 2008, you would be fairly disoriented and surprised by how many improvements they’ve made.
In the end, they Are very Slow to make improvements or to fix quirks. I’m just happy I can use align to get my sections parallel!
any improvement in families?
New categories available... that's it, really.
@@bimpure which ones?
I think that Revit is overkill for cad. Datacad and sketchup used together are much faster and easier and in the end it’s printed lines on paper of a pdf. How much trouble it takes to get there is your choice.
The future of AEC is much more than printed lines on paper my friend :)
Revit's continued market dominance really is a case study in how quality has nothing to do with success
Lol, revit is good tho.
@@RubbinRobbin It really, really isn't. Ask anyone who has used ArchiCAD. Meanwhile, there are half a dozen new BIM competitors coming down the road who will actually develop and improve their products.
@@henryglennon3864 Agree, but this Archicad 22, 23 & 24 although it is more flexible it is more complex to use than past version. Like they should've put more simplified settings in their dialogue settings and more graphical editing.
@@undo7711 Fair, but Revit has also been around years, has more resources to throw into development, and since so many good ideas have already been pioneered by Graphisoft, all Autodesk needs to do is rip them off. No innovation required.
@@henryglennon3864 yeah, the Revit is stagnant and Archicad became complex software to use. I think the advantage of learning Revit is there's so much video tutorial you can find here in ytube while Archicad barely has (some are not in english).