That´s a very famous chess game. In Spain it had an audience of 12 million people on TV. For a chess fan interested in chess history it´s not so difficult. Kasparov needed to win to retain the title. The game was adjourned and Kasparov quietly tied up Karpov´s pieces.
@@galderorobengoasanvicente4174 Knowing about the game is not hard. Remembering it by seeing a fucking board position is not something many could dream of doing.
Magnus once played ten lawyers at Harvard simultaneously, blindfolded. After the match he was talking to one of the attorneys, who said he regretted not taking notes of the moves, now being unable to show his game to his friends at the bar and the library. Magnus then proceeded to tell the guy all the moves that were made in their game
1. e4 Carlsen: "Fischer-Spassky 1972. Fischer was wearing a beige shirt. He had 3 eggs for breakfast, wheat toast and a glass of apple juice. He sneezed 4 times on the drive to the game."
One of the interesting things about Chess is that the current best player in the world is almost always the best player of all time. This is because the current players are not only playing with their skills, but also their memories of older games and historical players. As time moves ahead, the players themselves become better and better than their predecessors by remembering and improvising on their predecessors' games.
I don't think that's a correct assessment. Having less available knowledge doesn't equate being less good. I would reckon that if a top player from 100 years ago was in his peek form today, he would be equally as good, cause he too has this extra knowledge. Therefore a player 100 years ago was not less good, he had less available knowledge. People nowadays are not smarter than anytime throughout history, they just knew less. If you could send any regular person alive today back in time with their modern knowledge, they would very likely not fare better than the people of those days.
@@woutkoopman It's just a semantics argument. An engineer that knows all available engineering technology is still a better engineer than one that "could" know it but doesn't. If we have to take into account potential, then the best player is probably someone who has never played chess before.
@@woutkoopman Not a biggest chess fan actually, but as i understand it with time the competitive and innovative side of the game moves further from the beginning of game because of well researched debutes and midspiel... so the idea of current best player being best in entire chess history is kind of tricky thesis. In terms of winning against players from earlier times of course kasparov or karlsen would win against lasker for example, but if we will try to measure the dominant force of one player in his peak moment in a state of chess this player is playing magnus probably wouldn't be on top. Btw this discussion can be extrapolated to other sports like football for example, where the dominance of pele in his times is undoubtful, but if the whole brazilian world cup squad of 1958 or 1962 would play against modern team from the middle of scoreboard in seria A like torino it would be an equal game with an unpredictable result.
@@muhammadreyaaz808 Are you sure the games were famous ones? He regocnizes the position, names the players, then continues with the following moves, mentions the year and you ask why? This is much more impressive than you imagine!
How this would actually go: Defense attorney: Did you see my client on the morning of June 5th? Magnus: No, but I did see a very interesting material sacrifice by Firo in the rapid against So that day. Knight to e5 takes, the continuation was rook to d8 check. I was a point up, so I only needed a draw to secure a win, but it was impressive play by Alireza.
The one I found most interesting was how he recognized the position from the Harry Potter film. Unlike the others, this isn't one he would have encountered in the course of his professional study. But that he remembered it just shows that he must completely remember every chess position he's ever seen, whether "real" or not.
He is a professional chess player. I bet he was paying attention to the board while he watched it. There was a chess game in one porno and someone directly commented about how someone did an illegal move 💀💀
Or, he can tell from the board that the skandenavian was played and knew that Harry potter has a skandanavian played because he noticed that when he saw the film and connected the dots.
That was what made me think this is a setup. They were 4 moves in. 4. In just the recent 20 years that position has been reached by pros hundreds of times. So how can he recognize the game if there are lots of games with that opening? This video is for who has never played chess or followed competitive chess
@@Drepano yeah it’s a famous game in the petrov where the game was over in 6 moves. So because Magnus new it was probably going to be a big game he just assumed it was that one
@@Drepano it's mostly a guess and the fact that the previous game was also an Anand game helped him to guess that it's another Anand game featuring those moves
It was helped by historic and mostly that he only wanted to hear the black player name which indicated it wasn’t from a big tournament/a big name on the white side
Dabid had to see the position of the match to set up the board in which he beat Carlsen whereas Carlsen remembers the game in the adjacent table. It's wild!!!
him: yea yea remember that one time i bought you a pair of gucci shoes, on oct 12th, 2015 at 2:00 pm? and you still complained how your friends' shoes are better? Her: remember how you don't love me enough to spend a quarter of the time with me that you spend playing that DAMN board game? him: honey its not just a board game, its how i put food on the table her: yea and this is not just some papers, its divorce papers! ....and im taking the kids and the dog
Its not just the memory that is astonishing, its the obsession to watch and learn every single game in history of chess to become better that only a world champion can possess
When I play against the computer on medium difficulty, I'm just trying not to get angry at it for being a bastard, I can't remember any moves from the game.
The last round made the exact opposite impression on me. He would not have deliberately studied the Wizard's Chess game from Harry Potter. Having seen a position, it "costs" him very little to recognize and recall it. He might not even be that obsessed. Everyone at his level is already obsessed and hardworking, and there are only so many hours in a lifetime to accumulate practice. Massive, frequent competition at a global scale eventually selects for physiological adaptations that can't be replicated with hard work.
@@thelast9112 But like Dubov said their matches where played when both of them were "kids". It will definitly be interesting who will win when this much is on the line.
@@thelast9112 nepo has good record on any time format. They just rarely met because Nepo didn’t play solid so most of their game are not important matches, if you exclude it all Nepo has positive result against Magnus
@@AccountTill I mean if you ask me to recreate the berlin draw, i know for sure that i am still gonna mess it up even though i have seen it so many times. -A 1400 chesscom player.
The fact he doesn't remember the exact year with certainty, but is always right in his "guesses" shows he didn't even memorize all this stuff on purpose (which would already be hella impressive), he just studied/played/watched these games and simply knows them. I can't find words to describe how incredible this is.
They don’t just memorize the game position, but instead study and understand the game played. Study and have deep understanding forms a much more resilient memory, but might lose some not as important or visual details.
my memory works in a similar way, but it is nowhere near as elaborate in what's being remembered. I wonder wether something on his path made him so attuned to using his memory so profoundly.
@@AwoudeX This degree of memory is almost entirely innate. His ability to form neural connections is clearly incredibly fast and strong such that he can retain positions having just seen them once or twice.
I play sports competitively and after a match I can clearly remember what happened. Studying another person's match I can see myself in their position and follow through their thought process. I believe Magnus has the same process except chess is his sport
chess is basically a moving IQ test. i bet carlsen's IQ is way above genius. practice (memorizing past games and openings) is only half the battle. you have to be a genius to be among the very top chess players. unless your opponent is really bad, once you get past the mid game it's all about creativity and who can branch predict the deepest.
@@oldfrend Carlsen has it all to be a great chess player, but memorizing positions is probably the biggest part of it. He remembers similiar positions and knows what to do.
I've always assumed chess was associated to high visual-spatial intelligence but it's not. Kasparov did an IQ test for a magazine in 1987, and he scored genius level in verbal and arithmetic skills, but below child's level in picture thinking. Its possible even Bobby Fischer had the same thing going on, because he admitted that he could not do blind fold simuls. Visual-spatial intelligence works well with working memory and fast thinking (imo heuristics using just context), but does not help with sequential thinking. If I had to take an educated guess, I think Magnus is a more well rounded genius. Maybe slightly less in verbal intelligence then kasparov, but significantly higher in visual spatial. Might explain why Magnus can't give a clear answer to why he comes up with his chess moves. Just an interesting FYI I've come across.
I read his iq was in like the 190 range or something which would be one of the highest of all time but not sure how accurate it is, tho wouldn't surprise me...
For us, it's just a few pieces of chess randomly arranged but for Magnus, it's like showing a footballer a photograph of a certain iconic moment of a historic football game.
Exactly, if you showed one of my buddies a picture of deshaun Jackson fumbling the ball before he ran it back against the giants, or the famous picture of Brett Fabre running down the field of winning the super bowl, or a picture of Odell Beckham with the immaculate catch, my friend wouldn’t even know any of those but I could tell you which game those pictures were from, which two teams played in them, and about what year/season those games were played.
I can just imagine Magnus getting these random memories of games in his head that he played years ago and he is just playing the games further in his head as he goes about his day lol. Also the sheer ability of just playing chess games from both perspectives in their heads at any time they want makes super gm's incredible
I actually think he doesn't do that. He would have gone mad if he did. To be on such high level for so many years, you have to have the ability to disconnect completely from the game and think about other things, otherwise you will end up like Bobby Fischer.
@@drazen1972cro you are speculating a lot about psychology. The best are the best because they are thinking about it 24/7. Extended periods of time away from chess are probably very painful for magnus
You can argue that it's his job to know the famous games as he needed to study them when learning. But remembering that 19 years ago (at a youth tournament that would not be that notable given his current position) he had that position against Howell AND the more staggering point of remembering Ian's specific opening and exact mistake at that same round is just something else
I’ve seen him do this before, his memory is ridiculous. To have analyzed as many games as he has and to be able to remember a game by position on board is just incredible.
@@bananeneter999 Wasn't aware it was that high...Fischer had a 187...think Kasparov is 193 or 4......with the stunts of memory Magnus would have to all ready know ALL THE moves.say for the 1987 Match.....soI'd verify the memory if he was tasked with writing down MOVE for MOVE all the moves in the 1987 Seville Match. Then he'd have to know all the moves for the Fischer/Spassky 1992/1972/Reshevsky/Fischer/1961...see where I'm goin?....fake news stunt......sure he can play blindfold, but to just spit out EVERY move from EVERY TOURNAMENT/MATCH ever played is beyond impossible.
Folks try to compare remembering moves to remembering notes for a piano piece...NOT AT ALL the same....I'm a pianist and play music mostly from ROTE MUSCLE memory...my fingers know which keys to press cause I have done it so many times...my memory has nothing to do with it.
You can tell this level of recollection is completely effortless for him, he recognizes the position and the time he first came across it almost instantly. His memory really is superhuman, I wonder if anyone's ever studied him to see what his limits are. We saw that he's also naturally god tier on games like geo-guesser as well.
Consider, he only has to remember like less than 20 positions to make you impressed. There is only one tournament that they study and remembering a few games per year isn not that hard if it is your job and passion. Not saying he is not impressive, it's just not that big of a feat to remember stuff.
@@ihatesnickersTSD Wdym only one tournament? Bro are you out of your mind? HAHAHAH I will bet my life that you will never ever be able to memorize 100 games including the players who played the match and exact year. Even in one month I guarantee you that lmfao. Bro said "isn't that hard" lmfaooo even if it's your job it is hard. Stop being delusional, even a poem you made, you barely memorize it in 1 day. Someone being able to do that doesn't mean it's easy for him lol it takes skill and talent to be able to do what he is doing.
@@ihatesnickersTSD Playing 10 people at once blindfolded, beating them, and then also remembering every move of those games to perfection isn't impressive memory to you?
@@lugaretzia i do every year, for the last 40 years...and yes i am still here and so is she....i have fishing as a hobby so i told her from the beginning my head isnt where your birthday is so deal with it or leave...she dealt with it.
Naw, that's not amazing...i have hundreds and hundreds of chess books...and most of the books I love to look at read, are the K vs K matches, written by Ray Keene....there are times when these books will be in my bedroom/bathroom/literally anywhere at all and this has been happening since around 1978!!LOL....I'm a low rated patzer and always have been....I'm 70 now!!...and the chances are good that if I were to live a long life in my 80's or 90's....one of these Match Chess books would be close at hand:-)...I probably have ever Fischer book that was available as well!! And I'm just a musician!!!LOL
It’s crazy how many different topics of things people are into, to this depth. You have chemists who can look at a reaction and name it out of what seems like no where but they just clearly have dedicated their lives to knowing a lot. And on the opposite side of the spectrum you have people like this who love Chess so much they read books about historic game boards and can literally name them? People are amazing.
The amount of "it's really not that impressive if you think about it" in the comments is astounding. I guess there's really nothing remarkable about someone who is the best in the world at something proving one of many reasons why he is the best in the world at that something.
I think the problem is that they show(?!) some famous chess positions/moments. For example there are tens off thousands of hours of movies, but if show me some famous scenes from famous movies then i would probably recognize them and if u show me a random movieclip then i wont
@@sanderkonto297 True. But understand there's a MASSIVE difference between being a movie buff and competing in chess competitions. Chess boards are 64 squares with 32 pieces, and the games being presented aren't being presented with any kind of imagery. If I were to show you a picture of Will Smith in a suit holding a Squid baby, you could easily tell me that's Men in Black 1. Or, at the very least, it is a Will Smith movie. Magnus doesn't get to see the players, dates, venues. Just some configuration of 32 pieces on a board. To compare this to your movie knowledge, you'd have be presented with a single still or one second clip. Afterwards, you would have to not only tell me the name of the movie, but the names of the characters, the names of the actors who played those characters, directors/producers, the movie's budget and net gain/loss, and for good measure lots of lesser known trivia about the behind the scenes. I'd certainly find that kind of encyclopedic knowledge impressive, and I imagine I'd leave a similar comment to my original post on this video. If you're good at something, it can be impressive. That doesn't mean other people can't be impressive doing completely different things.
@@davidsantoso2291 These are not random matches. These are famous and legendary matches. I dont follow chess. I play poker for living and i probably do remember thousands of famous hands played. Because every hand is kind off a story.
@@davidsantoso2291 +I tryd and entered these names into google etc "wiswanathan anand vs vassily ivanchuk " and "Alonso Zapata vs Viswanathan Anand" and google automaticaly gave the same matches. They probably have played eachother tens maybe hundred of times. These here are the most famous ones. Try it yourself
This explains the whole thing why he is the best in the history of chess because 80-90% chess is memory based like from preprations openings past games apart from endgame tactics its all about memory based whoever gets the best memory will rule this game
"the next move played" is easier since there are not so many good options in each position and that's exactly why he studies games. But remembering who played them and years is kind of excessive info.
@@felipeportela5693 It's not so much about being a genius as it is superhuman memory combined with pattern recognition analytical / critical thinking. Chess is the perfect game for this. Now have him go practice and play the worlds best Go players and he may not do so well because it uses both sides of the brain and complex on many more levels.
He recognised the Anand - Zapata game with just two moves?😲 How's that even possible, I mean there are thousands of games in that opening and he picked the perfect one, wow
He recognized Zapata - Anand Game in 2 moves. Besides having a great memory he is also a great mind reader. Korchnoi pointed out that Petrosian and Spassky were amazing MIND READERS
@@AkramSaheb It's because of how the question was formulated. In that game there is a huge blunder so even though the opening is common, the way the question was asked gave it away
He played a blind chess game against 10 opponents and won them all. After the game a German fan told him he was sad that they didn't write down all the moves as he would have liked studying them. Magnus then sat down and wrote all ten games down for him.
its slightly less impressive when you realize that he was ALREADY playing blindfolded, so therefore, he was FORCED to remember each position entirely already. when doing blindfold simul's its very common practice to divide opponents into sections of opennings (i.e. 3 opponents you play d4 against, against another 3 you play e3, etc). This is called "chunking" and is a common practice used for anyone that wants to improve their memory (which in turn, makes it easier for recall later, not just during the games). with all that being said, the most impressive part isnt that he could write all 10 games down after the games (but yes thats still impressive). im 1700 and i could write 2 games down exactly after having played them. the most impressive part is that he played against 10 opponents blindfold and beat them all lmao.
Magnus was playing another GM in an online match that was being streamed. The opponents lines looked really suspect. The game eventually ended in a draw. Turns out, the other guy was using Stockfish, and he still couldn't beat the Champ.
@@zaksmith1035 carlsen thought its must be different if he play standart oppening. And that Anand game is the most famous one for that oppening. İts not easy but i he can guess
How exactly did Magnus recognize Zapata-Anand (1:35), having only seen two moves? It’s just Petrov’s Defence. 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 It’s simply not enough information to tell the exact game yet, no matter how profound your knowledge is. There’s tons of games starting like this in tournament practice.
I mean his memory is incredible. But it is more like someone remembering historical days and events, like the day D-Day happened, rather than remembering what happened on every single day.
He doesn't. Every move possible in chess has been done a million times over. The questions and setups were not "random games", they are very well known matches that stand out for one reason or another... so he didn't need to remember "one of the million random games where this move happened". Just the game that move or board position was well known for. It is like seeing Ramos about to complete a header on goal in late overtime. It could be from numerous games, but the most known situation and answer in this case would be the final of the Champions League where his goal brought them to overtime and led to them winning the trophy.
@@Planetdune Every move possible has not been done in chess. There are more positions possible than there are atoms in the universe. If one chess move was done a second across 1 billion boards simultaneously it would take millions of trillions of years to reach them all. So, no, every move possible has not be done millions of times, not by any stretch of the imagination. We have not even reached a tiny fraction of all possible positions and never will.
This is why he was called the Mozart of chess. Mozart did this. literally. With sacred music that wasnt meant to be known or shared outside the place he heard it in then he transcribed it from memory.
Allegri’s miserere. Banned from being performed outside the Sistine but later endorsed once the Pope heard Mozarts transcription. Oh and he was just 14 at the time.
I haven't played Chess in 20 year's. I somehow got here watching how amazingly beautiful Alex is; down the rabbit hole. There is not a way to articulate what I just watched. Absolutely stunning, the human brain is the most fascinating subject on earth. It's capable of the incapable.
0:35 Well, it must be a hella famous game that every chess fan have studied (just like most other games that are going to be shown here). It's like showing a football super fan a legendary world cup, Brazil x Italy or something. I think he is not simply remembering the moves, even if he thinks he is, what he's actually doing is analyzing the position and seeing the proper move. But that doesn't explain why he remembers the players and the game, so is a mix of both, a deep seeded analytical skill together with strong emotions and facts about those games players and events all in an intricate spider web of neurological connection. 0:40 I think he's shocked because he doesn't understand how chess player training works, Josh Waitzskin said that since he was a kid he spend hours watching great games with his teacher and studying positions. I hope Magnus tell them that. 1:38 Okay, but this part is nuts, i don't know how he did that. It looks like an ordinary opening for me. 3:13 SEEEEEEE!!!!! Those games were connected by a web of relevance. Was a nice trick to put that. 3:20 OOOOOOHHHHH C'MOM!!!!!! YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!
Does anyone else feel like we are living in a special time of witnessing the worlds greatest generation of chess champions? Not only the brilliance of these GMs but the class and respect they mutually have for their World Champion, and the respect he shows them, it's something very powerful. In every arena in life those who have honestly put in the work, respect others whom have done the same. Take notice of that in your day to day life, and if people keep finding you annoying... maybe analyze your efforts. This is what greatness looks like.
no, personally i can't see a reason to think it's somehow more special right now. we don't have to go far back in chess history to see more classy behaviour from the world champion, the previous WC Anand wouldn't storm out of press conference after losing a game (like Carlsen did in the match against Karjakin), not to mention Carlsen's online antics, rather disrespectful (like flipping the fnger to his opponents, playing visibly drunk etc.) i also think that the best, the most interesting times in chess were the ones marked with clear rivalry among two greats, head and shoulders above the rest - eg. Capablanca vs. Alekhine, Kasparov vs. Karpov, or Fischer vs. the Soviet chess machine (ok, not really a single opponent in his case, but a powerful collective rival, so to speak). Carlsen - through no fault of his of course - never had that, which is probably one of the main reasons why he got demotivated and decided to forfeit the title without putting up a fight.
For those who still don’t know how he guess the anand game so fast is because its a very famous loss in the world of chess that 5x world champion lost in 6 moves after a blunder , any body in chess long enough knows it.
They did a memory test on the world's best chess players. They showed them a board very briefly and then asked them to reconstruct it. Then they created some impossible positions and they were quite bad at it. It tells you a lot about how memory works, since they clearly aren't seeing where all the pieces are. They are seeing most of them and then rebuilding the rest. It's the same reason that eye witnesses are so unreliable. We see what we expect.
If a position is plausible, then they will understand how the position came to be and they can summarize it quickly and adjust the details (e.g. Najdorf Sicilian, exchange sacrifice on c3, then pawn race on each side), I suppose that's why it's more difficult to remember a made up position, because you have to remember each piece and pawn individually. Personally I like to try and remember positions after seeing them briefly but I'm not experiences enough to be able to remember the opening and the moves that lead to it, but I found that it's easier to remember the pawn structure and then the positions of the pieces in relation to the pawns. It's useless as I'm not even playing or studying chess seriously, but it's funny
Yep. That's also why he remembers the Harry Potter position, because they had an actual professional advisor create whole plausible game which was then used for the movie scenes
My brother has a memory like this, he remembers every game of every World Series, Superbowl, concert he's seen, everything we did as kids. He triggers original memories from when I was 5. He's a concert-level cello player. He has perfect pitch and is the kindest, most humble person I've ever met, He's also full-fledged paranoid schizophrenic, voices and all.
I just want Carlsen to be as famous as Ronaldo. His talents and hardworking are extraordinary and unrivalled by any of his contemporaries. Huge respect for you 👏🙌🙏❤.
Actually the most impressive for me is the "is it from a bullet game I played?" Wich could have flashed to a similar position, or if it was online, someone could have tried those moves against him just for fun... on a totally casual random match. Does he forget any game that he ever saw in his life??
Sometimes when I take a shower, I can't remember if I shampooed my hair yet.
Hahaha! 👍
🤣🤣🤣
Hahaha thank the heavens I have come across this comment.
I do that all the time.
We are level 1 crook, magnus is level 99 boss so its not even close
Bruh
"This is a game from the World Championships in 2045."
"That game hasn't been played yet."
"Time is not a straight line."
🤣🤣🤣
LOOOOL
"It just hasn't happened in your timeline yet"
Times more like a big ball of like timey wimey stuff
"Do you think I win because I play forward in time, or because I come back through time?"
Carlsen never rents a movie twice, he just grabs popcorn and close his eyes
hahahaha
sry :( i gave like nr 70
yessss
shit this is funny xD
Lmaooo
If a FICTIONAL movie character had this kind of memory, I'd call it unrealistic. This is insane
Ong
Spencer Reid has entered the chat.
He cheated there is lot of players that use the petroff how did he knows in the opening
I have literally called out amateur novelists for stuff like this.
@@hassaki9879 Moron
Magnus is the kind of guy that never forgets why he came into a room
hey i wouldn't go THAT far.
Thats sooo deep
He forgets, but just replays time since the big bang and arrives at an answer fast enough to conceal that he initially forgot.
@@Rhacman lmaaooo
This is a gold comment
"This is the 24th game from Seville, obviously."
Obviously.
That´s a very famous chess game. In Spain it had an audience of 12 million people on TV. For a chess fan interested in chess history it´s not so difficult. Kasparov needed to win to retain the title. The game was adjourned and Kasparov quietly tied up Karpov´s pieces.
@@galderorobengoasanvicente4174 ok magnus
Any base level Android should know this…..
Totes obvi
@@galderorobengoasanvicente4174 Knowing about the game is not hard. Remembering it by seeing a fucking board position is not something many could dream of doing.
I would have thought this was unrealistic if I saw a character do this in a chess movie/show.
Now let Carlsen play that character.
The most realistic movie ever
Now you know it’s possibly realistic, and now I wanna write a genius chess character who can tell what game it is just from looking at a position.
Same
@@edmontonboy99 He remember every chess patterns he played and then defeated the most powerful chess engine.
Matthew Grey Grubler's character in criminal minds doesn't seem so exaggerated now.
Magnus: has a photographic memory
Me: needs to take a photograph to remember where I parked my car
🤣
I need to take a photo of the car to check it's the right one when I manage to track it down....
Great shout though, definitely taking a picture of my spot next time I'm in a large carpark 😂
Yoo, I remember you! Project Zorgo and stuff.
😆
Magnus once played ten lawyers at Harvard simultaneously, blindfolded. After the match he was talking to one of the attorneys, who said he regretted not taking notes of the moves, now being unable to show his game to his friends at the bar and the library. Magnus then proceeded to tell the guy all the moves that were made in their game
I need to see the clip!
@@ASHStudios ua-cam.com/video/w1Rr4Uq1R-I/v-deo.html
@@ASHStudios there is probably not a clip because he could just have shown his friends that…
So is Magnus Chuck Norris?
@@carlosprieto2231 The Chuck Norris of brainpower
1. e4 Carlsen: "Fischer-Spassky 1972. Fischer was wearing a beige shirt. He had 3 eggs for breakfast, wheat toast and a glass of apple juice. He sneezed 4 times on the drive to the game."
"masturbated before the game to relax.. but unfortunately couldn't concentrate enough to finish it, so came to the game with a boner.."
This is like a Sherlock Holmes analysis.
"Blamed the Jews for something or other"
Dude, your comment made me laugh more that some comedy videos I have already forgotten about.
Logan Paul sneeze 3 times
two moves into a petroff: it must be anand
Yow! My favorite UA-cam math teacher is here
I was stunned by that. I still can't figure it out.
I think it's the game Anand thought for almost 4 minutes out of his 5 on one move
exactly :) like there aren't millions of games beginning like that, whatever he said you could say naaaah you wrong, and pick any other game.. rigged
mashallah tbark allah alhamdulillah inshallah better astaghfirullah
One of the interesting things about Chess is that the current best player in the world is almost always the best player of all time. This is because the current players are not only playing with their skills, but also their memories of older games and historical players. As time moves ahead, the players themselves become better and better than their predecessors by remembering and improvising on their predecessors' games.
evolution you say. aight
Well, to be the best today, that will not be enough. You must also familiarize yourself with Leela and Stockfish.
I don't think that's a correct assessment. Having less available knowledge doesn't equate being less good. I would reckon that if a top player from 100 years ago was in his peek form today, he would be equally as good, cause he too has this extra knowledge. Therefore a player 100 years ago was not less good, he had less available knowledge. People nowadays are not smarter than anytime throughout history, they just knew less. If you could send any regular person alive today back in time with their modern knowledge, they would very likely not fare better than the people of those days.
@@woutkoopman It's just a semantics argument. An engineer that knows all available engineering technology is still a better engineer than one that "could" know it but doesn't. If we have to take into account potential, then the best player is probably someone who has never played chess before.
@@woutkoopman Not a biggest chess fan actually, but as i understand it with time the competitive and innovative side of the game moves further from the beginning of game because of well researched debutes and midspiel... so the idea of current best player being best in entire chess history is kind of tricky thesis. In terms of winning against players from earlier times of course kasparov or karlsen would win against lasker for example, but if we will try to measure the dominant force of one player in his peak moment in a state of chess this player is playing magnus probably wouldn't be on top. Btw this discussion can be extrapolated to other sports like football for example, where the dominance of pele in his times is undoubtful, but if the whole brazilian world cup squad of 1958 or 1962 would play against modern team from the middle of scoreboard in seria A like torino it would be an equal game with an unpredictable result.
He ironically tweeted “They know it’s my job right?”
as if its okay to have a brain like an engine.
Why wouldn’t a grandmaster who is in the industry his whole life not know famous games?
@@muhammadreyaaz808
I mean, this is still pretty damn impressive. Even for a super GM.
@@josephc.3192 that's coming from a 1000 so yeah
@@muhammadreyaaz808 Are you sure the games were famous ones? He regocnizes the position, names the players, then continues with the following moves, mentions the year and you ask why?
This is much more impressive than you imagine!
@@josephc.3192 no it isn’t lol.
Imagine him being a witness in court
he must know where Jimmy Hoffa is buried
@@CSRookie classic, good one!
Bad luck for the criminal
@@tsukamano Maybe bad luck for Magnus
How this would actually go:
Defense attorney: Did you see my client on the morning of June 5th?
Magnus: No, but I did see a very interesting material sacrifice by Firo in the rapid against So that day. Knight to e5 takes, the continuation was rook to d8 check. I was a point up, so I only needed a draw to secure a win, but it was impressive play by Alireza.
Howel touches a pawn.
Carlsen: It's definitely Anand.
Right how could he know after two moves?!
@@jimbig3997 Because its a famous game and the way Howell asked the question :)
@@jimbig3997 it's practically the only petroff where something exciting (in this case a colossal blunder from anand) happens in the first 15 moves
😂😂😂
Brilliant!
The one I found most interesting was how he recognized the position from the Harry Potter film. Unlike the others, this isn't one he would have encountered in the course of his professional study. But that he remembered it just shows that he must completely remember every chess position he's ever seen, whether "real" or not.
Scary don't you think? Imagine he used it for some twisted ideology
He is a professional chess player. I bet he was paying attention to the board while he watched it. There was a chess game in one porno and someone directly commented about how someone did an illegal move 💀💀
Or, he can tell from the board that the skandenavian was played and knew that Harry potter has a skandanavian played because he noticed that when he saw the film and connected the dots.
@@aiden5457 bruh 💀
@@lopns3297 no cap
This man is unbelievable.
@@ayg7348 "You are so funny"
Believe it
Magnus is awesome, but every player from the top 200 would easily know this
@@ayg7348 Using gay as an insult huh?
@@It-s-me-P A random guy on internet disrespecting Magnus Carlsen, probably the most talented chess player ever... people is funny out there.
“I’m going to show you some historical chess positions…”
Magnus: “It’s Anand.”
“I haven’t set up the board yet.”
Magnus: “…”
“You’re right.”
That was what made me think this is a setup. They were 4 moves in. 4. In just the recent 20 years that position has been reached by pros hundreds of times. So how can he recognize the game if there are lots of games with that opening? This video is for who has never played chess or followed competitive chess
@@Drepano the word historical is a big hint (for Magnus) so it must be something that is remarkable and etched in history
@@Drepano yeah it’s a famous game in the petrov where the game was over in 6 moves. So because Magnus new it was probably going to be a big game he just assumed it was that one
@@Drepano it's mostly a guess and the fact that the previous game was also an Anand game helped him to guess that it's another Anand game featuring those moves
It was helped by historic and mostly that he only wanted to hear the black player name which indicated it wasn’t from a big tournament/a big name on the white side
David Howell is a Grandmaster top 200 player himself, and is blown away by Carlsen's memory.. just let that sink in
yeah.. dude is a freakin 2700 himself.
he used to be in the top 50 but he kind of gave up, went to uni etc.
Dabid had to see the position of the match to set up the board in which he beat Carlsen whereas Carlsen remembers the game in the adjacent table.
It's wild!!!
@@vibovitold hes number 56 in the world right now
Even by super GM standards, Magnus Carlsen's memory is incredible. And not only his memory of chess games.
2:50 "19 years ago and you still remember the game NEXT to you" lol
Out of all the crazy stuff in this video, that might be the craziest :p
When Magnus walks into a room, the room forgets why he walked in there.
lmao underrated comment
🤣🤣
underrated true
When Chuck Norris walks into a room, it is actually the room that enters Chuck Norris
Lol this is gonna give birth to all kind of Magnus based memes. Magnus is the new Chuck
Magnus is the only guy to out-remember his wife during an argument.
Then she would checkmate him with a divorce. Game over.
I'm sorry but that's impossible
him: yea yea remember that one time i bought you a pair of gucci shoes, on oct 12th, 2015 at 2:00 pm? and you still complained how your friends' shoes are better?
Her: remember how you don't love me enough to spend a quarter of the time with me that you spend playing that DAMN board game?
him: honey its not just a board game, its how i put food on the table
her: yea and this is not just some papers, its divorce papers! ....and im taking the kids and the dog
haha.. this comment is so underrated
Brilliant comment.
Nobody’s gonna know how lil Timmy got those likes yikesss
🤣 true
This generally does not work with a significant other. You can have perfect recall, but you'll somehow still be wrong.
@@MrSatchelpack facts
He should know better that playing the old memory opening could result in him being down a queen very quickly.
HAHAHAHA
Its not just the memory that is astonishing, its the obsession to watch and learn every single game in history of chess to become better that only a world champion can possess
Kinda like Milos Raonic studying old tapes of Pete Sampras
@@billybo4996 No mate, Raonic is a one dimensional serve bot...
When I play against the computer on medium difficulty, I'm just trying not to get angry at it for being a bastard, I can't remember any moves from the game.
The last round made the exact opposite impression on me. He would not have deliberately studied the Wizard's Chess game from Harry Potter. Having seen a position, it "costs" him very little to recognize and recall it. He might not even be that obsessed.
Everyone at his level is already obsessed and hardworking, and there are only so many hours in a lifetime to accumulate practice. Massive, frequent competition at a global scale eventually selects for physiological adaptations that can't be replicated with hard work.
Every gm does this
this Guy probaply remebers what his mother ate every day when she was pregnant with him
He probably knew it was a very famous game from context, and maybe that narrowed it down sufficiently after a couple of moves?
@@elleveldy still ultra goddamn impressive tho
"Her"
photographic memory, there is no other explanation
He even remember how he was ma- sry went too far
This guy deserves his title.
@@yehiafathy2465 lost what exactly
the world title is decided in november lol
@@yehiafathy2465 this guy is probably new to chess and doesnt know how the world championship title works
@@ninjai5527 🤣
@@yehiafathy2465 Well this didnt age well
"When Howell brought back memories of me finishing behind Nepo 19 years ago I started to take the World championship-game in november personally"
Lol but i think he really should tho nepo has good record againts him in classical chess
Change seriously to personally.
@@thelast9112 But like Dubov said their matches where played when both of them were "kids". It will definitly be interesting who will win when this much is on the line.
@@thelast9112 nepo has good record on any time format. They just rarely met because Nepo didn’t play solid so most of their game are not important matches, if you exclude it all Nepo has positive result against Magnus
Nice reference
I cant remember one entire game to save my life
Hell no, me neither
I can actually remember a whole game Super GM level, Carlsen-Nakamura double bongcloud!
i know, impressive :)
For that matter😋, I remember a lot of top level games though,
They are Berlin and bongcloud draws though.
@@AccountTill I mean if you ask me to recreate the berlin draw, i know for sure that i am still gonna mess it up even though i have seen it so many times. -A 1400 chesscom player.
I can't even remember which piece goes where
The fact he doesn't remember the exact year with certainty, but is always right in his "guesses" shows he didn't even memorize all this stuff on purpose (which would already be hella impressive), he just studied/played/watched these games and simply knows them. I can't find words to describe how incredible this is.
They don’t just memorize the game position, but instead study and understand the game played. Study and have deep understanding forms a much more resilient memory, but might lose some not as important or visual details.
my memory works in a similar way, but it is nowhere near as elaborate in what's being remembered. I wonder wether something on his path made him so attuned to using his memory so profoundly.
He literally reads books about the matches and the moves
@@AwoudeX This degree of memory is almost entirely innate. His ability to form neural connections is clearly incredibly fast and strong such that he can retain positions having just seen them once or twice.
I play sports competitively and after a match I can clearly remember what happened. Studying another person's match I can see myself in their position and follow through their thought process. I believe Magnus has the same process except chess is his sport
His brain has been literally built around processing a chess board since his childhood.
chess is basically a moving IQ test. i bet carlsen's IQ is way above genius. practice (memorizing past games and openings) is only half the battle. you have to be a genius to be among the very top chess players. unless your opponent is really bad, once you get past the mid game it's all about creativity and who can branch predict the deepest.
@@oldfrend Carlsen has it all to be a great chess player, but memorizing positions is probably the biggest part of it. He remembers similiar positions and knows what to do.
I've always assumed chess was associated to high visual-spatial intelligence but it's not. Kasparov did an IQ test for a magazine in 1987, and he scored genius level in verbal and arithmetic skills, but below child's level in picture thinking. Its possible even Bobby Fischer had the same thing going on, because he admitted that he could not do blind fold simuls. Visual-spatial intelligence works well with working memory and fast thinking (imo heuristics using just context), but does not help with sequential thinking. If I had to take an educated guess, I think Magnus is a more well rounded genius. Maybe slightly less in verbal intelligence then kasparov, but significantly higher in visual spatial. Might explain why Magnus can't give a clear answer to why he comes up with his chess moves. Just an interesting FYI I've come across.
I read his iq was in like the 190 range or something which would be one of the highest of all time but not sure how accurate it is, tho wouldn't surprise me...
@@cole4832 well, I don't think he ever took an IQ test.
What an amazing down to Earth person, insanely intelligent, sociable, he is a role model for many youth. Keep doing what you do best Magnus!
Dude your name..
Haters: He's clearly cheating by memorizing every match ever played.
Aside from the unbelieveble memory he has, Magnus has developed his social skills remarkably well.
Yeah he really progressed in the last 5 years
@@Qwerty123zzuy I think it has more to do with his ability to converse in English improving not necessarily his social skills.
@@dannydonnelly8198 no his english is still trash...his behavior improved as he interacted with many more people.
@@Qwerty123zzuy Chill daddy, his English is nowhere near trash.
@@hristiyanhristov2480 it is
Magnus Carlsen is the real source for Agadmator when he says "and it was at this position we have completely new game".
"...captures captures"
Feel free to pause the video
It was in this position, on move "X", that the players agreed to a draw
"Hello everyone and welcome to another great game between...
Some nasty discoveries here
I love how David is so humble while being a fabulous chess player himself. He’s also very insightful in his chess match commentary
David looks so happy when Magnus remembers his game against him lol
I didn’t realize that was their game, haha that explains a lot
@@jeffwei wait how you have verified tick
@@GhostOps300 is fake
@@ricefarmer9183 how to get that?
For us, it's just a few pieces of chess randomly arranged but for Magnus, it's like showing a footballer a photograph of a certain iconic moment of a historic football game.
That's exactly what I thought.
Dayum !!! Such an underrated comment ...
As a football fan, Magnus could probably be this hypothetical footballer as well.
I would have been closer to knowing some things then. Magnus would still remember it all, since he watches a lot of football
Exactly, if you showed one of my buddies a picture of deshaun Jackson fumbling the ball before he ran it back against the giants, or the famous picture of Brett Fabre running down the field of winning the super bowl, or a picture of Odell Beckham with the immaculate catch, my friend wouldn’t even know any of those but I could tell you which game those pictures were from, which two teams played in them, and about what year/season those games were played.
I love the small detail at 3:14 where the camera very subtly follows Carlsen's gaze.
Exactly at pi value lol
Yeah. It’s awesome isn’t it.
Looks like a frame magnification rather than camera work.
@@chomalen definitely, i couldn't imagine a cameraman tracking a person's glances xD
I can just imagine Magnus getting these random memories of games in his head that he played years ago and he is just playing the games further in his head as he goes about his day lol. Also the sheer ability of just playing chess games from both perspectives in their heads at any time they want makes super gm's incredible
I actually think he doesn't do that. He would have gone mad if he did. To be on such high level for so many years, you have to have the ability to disconnect completely from the game and think about other things, otherwise you will end up like Bobby Fischer.
@@drazen1972cro you are speculating a lot about psychology. The best are the best because they are thinking about it 24/7. Extended periods of time away from chess are probably very painful for magnus
You can argue that it's his job to know the famous games as he needed to study them when learning. But remembering that 19 years ago (at a youth tournament that would not be that notable given his current position) he had that position against Howell AND the more staggering point of remembering Ian's specific opening and exact mistake at that same round is just something else
I get your point but the way he told the story about that match makes it seem like it's been brought up at least a few times before
I’ve seen him do this before, his memory is ridiculous. To have analyzed as many games as he has and to be able to remember a game by position on board is just incredible.
Most of the Super GMs are like this. When I realised, I knew I had no chance to ever reach that level. They're just built differently.
@@paulking5199 did you ever consider that you just suck at chess?
@@dudedog7914 Suck is a bit harsh, probably more like a human.
@@bananeneter999 Wasn't aware it was that high...Fischer had a 187...think Kasparov is 193 or 4......with the stunts of memory Magnus would have to all ready know ALL THE moves.say for the 1987 Match.....soI'd verify the memory if he was tasked with writing down MOVE for MOVE all the moves in the 1987 Seville Match. Then he'd have to know all the moves for the Fischer/Spassky 1992/1972/Reshevsky/Fischer/1961...see where I'm goin?....fake news stunt......sure he can play blindfold, but to just spit out EVERY move from EVERY TOURNAMENT/MATCH ever played is beyond impossible.
Folks try to compare remembering moves to remembering notes for a piano piece...NOT AT ALL the same....I'm a pianist and play music mostly from ROTE MUSCLE memory...my fingers know which keys to press cause I have done it so many times...my memory has nothing to do with it.
Magnus is the type of guy who’s computer saves files on his mind.
Whose (a mistake Magnus wouldn't make, despite being Norwegian ;-))
They're going to name the next big computer server the "Magnus" lol
"Magnus, who is computer" - That would explain a lot of things
🤣🤣🤣 That's funny.
@@Walterwaltraud 🤓🤓🤓
You can tell this level of recollection is completely effortless for him, he recognizes the position and the time he first came across it almost instantly. His memory really is superhuman, I wonder if anyone's ever studied him to see what his limits are. We saw that he's also naturally god tier on games like geo-guesser as well.
Consider, he only has to remember like less than 20 positions to make you impressed. There is only one tournament that they study and remembering a few games per year isn not that hard if it is your job and passion. Not saying he is not impressive, it's just not that big of a feat to remember stuff.
its not that hard lmao yeah right this man can play over 10 chess game at the same time blindfolded, what are you talking about @@ihatesnickersTSD
@@ihatesnickersTSD Wdym only one tournament? Bro are you out of your mind? HAHAHAH I will bet my life that you will never ever be able to memorize 100 games including the players who played the match and exact year. Even in one month I guarantee you that lmfao. Bro said "isn't that hard" lmfaooo even if it's your job it is hard. Stop being delusional, even a poem you made, you barely memorize it in 1 day. Someone being able to do that doesn't mean it's easy for him lol it takes skill and talent to be able to do what he is doing.
Veritasium has a video on it.
@@ihatesnickersTSD Playing 10 people at once blindfolded, beating them, and then also remembering every move of those games to perfection isn't impressive memory to you?
Imagine him forgetting his girlfriend's birthday. Good luck apologising for that.
Are we guys supposed to remember that?????
@@MrKveite1 try forgetting it once and see what happens. please report back (if you can)
@@lugaretzia i do every year, for the last 40 years...and yes i am still here and so is she....i have fishing as a hobby so i told her from the beginning my head isnt where your birthday is so deal with it or leave...she dealt with it.
He just remember chess
@@MrKveite1 does she remember yours?
You know you love chess when you remember the moves from a random Harry Potter movie that’s insane.
I just realized that the golden trio would have been screwed if carlsen played the white pieces.
I think Magnus read Harry Potter as a kid? I think it was mentioned in the Play Magnus app?
That's the only chess game from any Harry Potter movie
I mean he could have guessed it was from recent Queen's Gambit but remembered Harry Potter
The Queen's Gambit would never be his guess.
What fascinates me is that he has a book on Kasparov - Karpov games at his bedside after all these years. The guy just eats, sleeps and breaths chess.
Naw, that's not amazing...i have hundreds and hundreds of chess books...and most of the books I love to look at read, are the K vs K matches, written by Ray Keene....there are times when these books will be in my bedroom/bathroom/literally anywhere at all and this has been happening since around 1978!!LOL....I'm a low rated patzer and always have been....I'm 70 now!!...and the chances are good that if I were to live a long life in my 80's or 90's....one of these Match Chess books would be close at hand:-)...I probably have ever Fischer book that was available as well!! And I'm just a musician!!!LOL
It’s crazy how many different topics of things people are into, to this depth. You have chemists who can look at a reaction and name it out of what seems like no where but they just clearly have dedicated their lives to knowing a lot. And on the opposite side of the spectrum you have people like this who love Chess so much they read books about historic game boards and can literally name them? People are amazing.
Don't talk about chemistry, I've got exams in a few weeks' time wishing I had half of Magnus' memory
The amount of "it's really not that impressive if you think about it" in the comments is astounding. I guess there's really nothing remarkable about someone who is the best in the world at something proving one of many reasons why he is the best in the world at that something.
I think the problem is that they show(?!) some famous chess positions/moments. For example there are tens off thousands of hours of movies, but if show me some famous scenes from famous movies then i would probably recognize them and if u show me a random movieclip then i wont
@@sanderkonto297 True. But understand there's a MASSIVE difference between being a movie buff and competing in chess competitions. Chess boards are 64 squares with 32 pieces, and the games being presented aren't being presented with any kind of imagery. If I were to show you a picture of Will Smith in a suit holding a Squid baby, you could easily tell me that's Men in Black 1. Or, at the very least, it is a Will Smith movie. Magnus doesn't get to see the players, dates, venues. Just some configuration of 32 pieces on a board.
To compare this to your movie knowledge, you'd have be presented with a single still or one second clip. Afterwards, you would have to not only tell me the name of the movie, but the names of the characters, the names of the actors who played those characters, directors/producers, the movie's budget and net gain/loss, and for good measure lots of lesser known trivia about the behind the scenes. I'd certainly find that kind of encyclopedic knowledge impressive, and I imagine I'd leave a similar comment to my original post on this video. If you're good at something, it can be impressive. That doesn't mean other people can't be impressive doing completely different things.
@@davidsantoso2291 These are not random matches. These are famous and legendary matches. I dont follow chess. I play poker for living and i probably do remember thousands of famous hands played. Because every hand is kind off a story.
@@davidsantoso2291 +I tryd and entered these names into google etc "wiswanathan anand vs vassily ivanchuk " and "Alonso Zapata vs Viswanathan Anand" and google automaticaly gave the same matches. They probably have played eachother tens maybe hundred of times. These here are the most famous ones. Try it yourself
@@davidsantoso2291 Not to act like this isnt insanely impressive, but Magnus likely does not remember millions of games.
Remembering the position is one thing, associating it with real-life competition and persons is incredibly impressive
I think it's easier to remember if you can associate it with something.
Our memory often works in an associative way
I can literally not memorize two opening lines for about 4 moves. His brain is the complete Databank of a chess program!
He is truly one of a kind - an absolute master of his craft. Genius.
Top chess genius among the chess geniuses.
This is one of most insane things I’ve seen.
19 years ago Nepo was beating an Indonesian player who was up a pawn
Magnus: And I took that personally
Magnus just watches movies for the chess scenes. Really.
I understand him
@@juliocadavid6640 Are you some sort of a wizard Harry ?
I pause at chess scenes at times too just to see if they knew what they were doing
He would probably spoil Queen's gambit on the first move😂
the rest is like credits for him
This explains the whole thing why he is the best in the history of chess because 80-90% chess is memory based like from preprations openings past games apart from endgame tactics its all about memory based whoever gets the best memory will rule this game
How is this possible, i mean just how! Nothing but genius to even know what was the next move played. Just love Magnus.
"the next move played" is easier since there are not so many good options in each position and that's exactly why he studies games. But remembering who played them and years is kind of excessive info.
Just about any GM is like this. Watch their videos, chess lessons and such. It's unbelievable.
@@Blaisem yeah, it's their professional field, most part of those guys study it since childhood. But anyway, Carlsen is a fucking genius
@@Blaisem agree!
@@felipeportela5693 It's not so much about being a genius as it is superhuman memory combined with pattern recognition analytical / critical thinking. Chess is the perfect game for this. Now have him go practice and play the worlds best Go players and he may not do so well because it uses both sides of the brain and complex on many more levels.
4 moves in, “Yea thats Anand vs Zapata 1984.”
Jokes on you, that was P*zzycrusher1245 vs Redleafotato24 on Lichess in 2019z
underrated comment
He recognised the Anand - Zapata game with just two moves?😲 How's that even possible, I mean there are thousands of games in that opening and he picked the perfect one, wow
at that game anand blunder at move 5, thats an iconic game
@@Adam-oh3pc and he recognized it at move 2
its not possible of course...but he had a hunch I guess...still stupid
@@williamrobert9898 listen that he said "stop me when you recognized the game and tell me who plays the black", so of course magnus know that
It's obvious that they won't ask any random stupid games they must be asking famous games of great players.
Magnus Carlson might have more chess games memorized then I have memories
here's a thing to remember, his name is Carlsen, not Carlson
He even remember the Harry potter chess set...hahaha..so crazy
It's pretty amazing that a prodigy of his level grew up this charismatic
Not only that, he worked as a fashion model before getting into professional chess
He recognized Zapata - Anand Game in 2 moves. Besides having a great memory he is also a great mind reader. Korchnoi pointed out that Petrosian and Spassky were amazing MIND READERS
Weren’t there many chess players who played this opening? Couldn’t it have been anyone? I seem to recall that the Petrov was a favorite of Fabian.
@@kuppdaballsstrokedastaff429 Exactly. Petrov is not that uncommon
@@nirolf12 lol i think the person was using the same book and was going in order and Magnus figured out the book he was using because he had read it.
@@AkramSaheb It's because of how the question was formulated. In that game there is a huge blunder so even though the opening is common, the way the question was asked gave it away
@@kuppdaballsstrokedastaff429 EXACTLY MY POINTS!!!LOL
He played a blind chess game against 10 opponents and won them all. After the game a German fan told him he was sad that they didn't write down all the moves as he would have liked studying them. Magnus then sat down and wrote all ten games down for him.
@dream-jordan theres a link somewhere else here in the comments if you scroll through it
@dream-jordan ua-cam.com/video/w1Rr4Uq1R-I/v-deo.html
its slightly less impressive when you realize that he was ALREADY playing blindfolded, so therefore, he was FORCED to remember each position entirely already. when doing blindfold simul's its very common practice to divide opponents into sections of opennings (i.e. 3 opponents you play d4 against, against another 3 you play e3, etc). This is called "chunking" and is a common practice used for anyone that wants to improve their memory (which in turn, makes it easier for recall later, not just during the games).
with all that being said, the most impressive part isnt that he could write all 10 games down after the games (but yes thats still impressive). im 1700 and i could write 2 games down exactly after having played them. the most impressive part is that he played against 10 opponents blindfold and beat them all lmao.
@Stradivarius yes man everybody is just as incapable as you are and nobody in the world could ever be better than you at anything
Love the little detail of "A German fan". Only a German would be interest enough in a detail like that XD
Absolutely astounding! I can't even comprehend being able to do this. Excellent!!!
What is even more mind-blowing is that he stays this sexy year around.
Magnus.. sexy?
@@frayedendsofsanity1733 Sexy is an understatement
he usually varies in sexiness actually
@@frayedendsofsanity1733 nice profile pic
Why are you gay? 😁
3:15 the camera/ editing work is something else I like subtle movements like that
Netflix should do a series on Magnus called the "Kings Gambit"
The continuation of the Queens Gambit😅
That would be fye
100%
yes, but they should call it "The Scandinavian"
The storyline probably would seem too exaggerated!
Magnus was playing another GM in an online match that was being streamed. The opponents lines looked really suspect. The game eventually ended in a draw. Turns out, the other guy was using Stockfish, and he still couldn't beat the Champ.
moves a pawn and a knight
Magnus: “it’s gonna be Anand” 😭
And he was right, it was crazy. and Harry potter chess quest. Many say GM remember the same, but i don't think they would remember Potter challenge
How did he figure that one out? It's just a Petroff. There have been thousands of Petroffs.....
"can you at least let me fINISH??"
Zak Smith was wondering the same like wtf lol
@@zaksmith1035 carlsen thought its must be different if he play standart oppening. And that Anand game is the most famous one for that oppening. İts not easy but i he can guess
The last one really put it over the top for me. I didn't think he'd get it! Wow.
I just couldn't stop smiling in pure awe through the entire video, what an amazing man!
How exactly did Magnus recognize Zapata-Anand (1:35), having only seen two moves? It’s just Petrov’s Defence.
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
It’s simply not enough information to tell the exact game yet, no matter how profound your knowledge is. There’s tons of games starting like this in tournament practice.
That was Anand's quickest defeat ever. One of the most shocking games in chess history. Losing after 6 moves
Can't believe, how it's even possible to remember a game from 1900s, with every moves, means he remembers hundreds or thousands of games. Insane
I mean his memory is incredible. But it is more like someone remembering historical days and events, like the day D-Day happened, rather than remembering what happened on every single day.
It's crazy how good he looks for someone who remembers a chess game from 1900s
He doesn't. Every move possible in chess has been done a million times over. The questions and setups were not "random games", they are very well known matches that stand out for one reason or another... so he didn't need to remember "one of the million random games where this move happened". Just the game that move or board position was well known for. It is like seeing Ramos about to complete a header on goal in late overtime. It could be from numerous games, but the most known situation and answer in this case would be the final of the Champions League where his goal brought them to overtime and led to them winning the trophy.
Hundreds or thousands? More like millions.
@@Planetdune Every move possible has not been done in chess. There are more positions possible than there are atoms in the universe. If one chess move was done a second across 1 billion boards simultaneously it would take millions of trillions of years to reach them all. So, no, every move possible has not be done millions of times, not by any stretch of the imagination. We have not even reached a tiny fraction of all possible positions and never will.
Normal person: I need to buy hard disk to store data.
Carlsen: Well i store it in my main memory.
The human brain has 2000 TB of storage or sth. Apparently magnus has managed to make use of all of it lol.
Magnus isn't human. He is a chess robot from the future.
but cant beat stockfish??? hmmm..............
so humble we do not even realize how great he is.
lol, humble, Carlson, sure
Magnus' memory is actually crazy lmao
This is why he was called the Mozart of chess.
Mozart did this. literally. With sacred music that wasnt meant to be known or shared outside the place he heard it in then he transcribed it from memory.
Allegri’s miserere. Banned from being performed outside the Sistine but later endorsed once the Pope heard Mozarts transcription. Oh and he was just 14 at the time.
I haven't played Chess in 20 year's. I somehow got here watching how amazingly beautiful Alex is; down the rabbit hole. There is not a way to articulate what I just watched. Absolutely stunning, the human brain is the most fascinating subject on earth. It's capable of the incapable.
0:35 Well, it must be a hella famous game that every chess fan have studied (just like most other games that are going to be shown here). It's like showing a football super fan a legendary world cup, Brazil x Italy or something.
I think he is not simply remembering the moves, even if he thinks he is, what he's actually doing is analyzing the position and seeing the proper move. But that doesn't explain why he remembers the players and the game, so is a mix of both, a deep seeded analytical skill together with strong emotions and facts about those games players and events all in an intricate spider web of neurological connection.
0:40 I think he's shocked because he doesn't understand how chess player training works, Josh Waitzskin said that since he was a kid he spend hours watching great games with his teacher and studying positions. I hope Magnus tell them that.
1:38 Okay, but this part is nuts, i don't know how he did that. It looks like an ordinary opening for me.
3:13 SEEEEEEE!!!!! Those games were connected by a web of relevance. Was a nice trick to put that.
3:20 OOOOOOHHHHH C'MOM!!!!!! YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!
Does anyone else feel like we are living in a special time of witnessing the worlds greatest generation of chess champions? Not only the brilliance of these GMs but the class and respect they mutually have for their World Champion, and the respect he shows them, it's something very powerful. In every arena in life those who have honestly put in the work, respect others whom have done the same. Take notice of that in your day to day life, and if people keep finding you annoying... maybe analyze your efforts. This is what greatness looks like.
Theres this one dude that literally doesnt even care, but for the rest I totally agree.
no, personally i can't see a reason to think it's somehow more special right now.
we don't have to go far back in chess history to see more classy behaviour from the world champion, the previous WC Anand wouldn't storm out of press conference after losing a game (like Carlsen did in the match against Karjakin), not to mention Carlsen's online antics, rather disrespectful (like flipping the fnger to his opponents, playing visibly drunk etc.)
i also think that the best, the most interesting times in chess were the ones marked with clear rivalry among two greats, head and shoulders above the rest - eg. Capablanca vs. Alekhine, Kasparov vs. Karpov, or Fischer vs. the Soviet chess machine (ok, not really a single opponent in his case, but a powerful collective rival, so to speak).
Carlsen - through no fault of his of course - never had that, which is probably one of the main reasons why he got demotivated and decided to forfeit the title without putting up a fight.
Dude was still arranging the second game, Magnus answered 😅😅
For those who still don’t know how he guess the anand game so fast is because its a very famous loss in the world of chess that 5x world champion lost in 6 moves after a blunder , any body in chess long enough knows it.
They did a memory test on the world's best chess players. They showed them a board very briefly and then asked them to reconstruct it. Then they created some impossible positions and they were quite bad at it. It tells you a lot about how memory works, since they clearly aren't seeing where all the pieces are. They are seeing most of them and then rebuilding the rest. It's the same reason that eye witnesses are so unreliable. We see what we expect.
If a position is plausible, then they will understand how the position came to be and they can summarize it quickly and adjust the details (e.g. Najdorf Sicilian, exchange sacrifice on c3, then pawn race on each side), I suppose that's why it's more difficult to remember a made up position, because you have to remember each piece and pawn individually.
Personally I like to try and remember positions after seeing them briefly but I'm not experiences enough to be able to remember the opening and the moves that lead to it, but I found that it's easier to remember the pawn structure and then the positions of the pieces in relation to the pawns. It's useless as I'm not even playing or studying chess seriously, but it's funny
Yep. That's also why he remembers the Harry Potter position, because they had an actual professional advisor create whole plausible game which was then used for the movie scenes
Magnus 3:00 processing 1 million chess games in memory database.
Magnus Carlsen's memory is so amazing that even the video forgot what Magnus said in the last 3 seconds
Carlsen is that type of guy that never had a DVD movie cause he even can remember his seat number of each cinema visit.
This is a great example of what it actually takes to be great at chess.
He'll still forget an anniversary with his future wife and be in trouble like all of us =)
I don't know about the trouble part. This man can have any woman he wants
I am Norwegian and I have seen interviews with his friends who say he always remembers their birthdays :)
@@Narcan885 Doesn't matter, they always complain about something.
1:34 David is literally playing petrov then magnus already realize which game it was??? Insane
Only reason it is because it's an historic anand game where he lost in 6 moves
This man is insane, I mean the way he thinks, his lifestyle and the fact that he is a normal person not a nerd, I appreciate him so much.
he is a nerd, but still a normal person. lol being a nerd isn't a disease 😜
@@mulansings.2004 I didn't say that being nerd is a disease, I didn't mean to offend at all, I just mean that Magnus is a cool guy
@@glassorax i know i get it 😊
He IS a nerd! Hehe
Having this kind of memory must be absolutely agonizing when it comes to remembering your own losses at high stakes. Would keep me up at night.
This doensn't only show his great ability to remember games, which is a world champion defining trait, but also his hard hard work.
He remembers moves from the 80s I can't even remember why I entered my room 🤦♂️
Shows why he is so good, he's put in the work, a master of his craft
My brother has a memory like this, he remembers every game of every World Series, Superbowl, concert he's seen, everything we did as kids. He triggers original memories from when I was 5. He's a concert-level cello player. He has perfect pitch and is the kindest, most humble person I've ever met, He's also full-fledged paranoid schizophrenic, voices and all.
3:23 daaaaayum how does he knows even that omg
I just want Carlsen to be as famous as Ronaldo. His talents and hardworking are extraordinary and unrivalled by any of his contemporaries. Huge respect for you 👏🙌🙏❤.
I know Carlsen, but who is Ronaldo ???
@@maciejwawryniuk7915 your mom
@@farokhcooper8788 Dude doesnt even know his mom's name, smh...
Lol Ronaldo
0:38 - "This is the 24th game from Sevilla, OBVIOUSLY".
I think Magnus needs to check a dictionary to see what obviously really means.
Actually the most impressive for me is the "is it from a bullet game I played?"
Wich could have flashed to a similar position, or if it was online, someone could have tried those moves against him just for fun... on a totally casual random match.
Does he forget any game that he ever saw in his life??
Either that, or he really identified with Harry Potter. You know, being a wizard/chosen one himself and everything