Sir, please refer to discussion regarding interpretation of the word ' investigate' in section 157 IEA and its application to departmental proceedings. I think that the word 'investigate' has been used in a contest with the investigation by the law enforcement agencies authorised by law to investigate and it won't be applicable to departmental proceedings. Please enlighten.
Sir apne kha ki legally competent means competent under some provision of law but sir police officer is competent to investigate leki unko di gyi statement ko corroborate nhi Kiya ja skta because of sec162 crpc
Those statements are after the investigation has started. An investigation begins after registration of an FIR. There are instances where certain statements are recorded before the investigation has begun, for instance, a police officer records a statement of a victim who might not survive. In that case, if the victim does not survive, the statement would fall under section 32 of the Indian evidence act. But where he survives it'll be treated under section 157 of the Indian evidence act and not 161 crpc because the investigation had not begun at the time of recording the statement.
Sir, please refer to discussion regarding interpretation of the word ' investigate' in section 157 IEA and its application to departmental proceedings. I think that the word 'investigate' has been used in a contest with the investigation by the law enforcement agencies authorised by law to investigate and it won't be applicable to departmental proceedings. Please enlighten.
Sir seems like u have a another utube channel that is "bhagat singh " . 😊
Sir apne kha ki legally competent means competent under some provision of law but sir police officer is competent to investigate leki unko di gyi statement ko corroborate nhi Kiya ja skta because of sec162 crpc
Those statements are after the investigation has started. An investigation begins after registration of an FIR. There are instances where certain statements are recorded before the investigation has begun, for instance, a police officer records a statement of a victim who might not survive. In that case, if the victim does not survive, the statement would fall under section 32 of the Indian evidence act. But where he survives it'll be treated under section 157 of the Indian evidence act and not 161 crpc because the investigation had not begun at the time of recording the statement.
Please consider muting Mr. Verma. Disturbs too much