Panzergrenadier-Division & Motorized Infantry Division 1939/1944

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
  • A look at the Panzergrenadier-Division 44 and its predecessor the motorized infantry division from 1939/40. This video looks at the organization of both divisions, their equipment, weapons, manpower and other elements.
    » Get our books «
    » The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - sturmzug.com
    » Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com
    » HOW YOU CAN SUPPORT MILITARY HISTORY VISUALIZED «
    (A) You can support my channel on Patreon: / mhv
    (B) You can also buy "Spoils of War" (merchandise) in the online shop: www.redbubble.com/people/mhvi...
    » SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS «
    facebook: / milhistoryvisualized
    twitter: / milhivisualized
    tumblr: / militaryhistoryvisualized
    Comparison between the Panzergrenadier Division 44 and a motorized infantry division from 1939. Taking a look at manpower, equipment and organization.
    Script & Further Information: militaryhistoryvisualized.com/...
    --Sources--
    -Books & Articles-
    Keilig, Wolf: Das deutsche Heer 1939-1945 Gliederung, Einsatz, Stellenbesetzung.
    Wettstein, Adrian: Sturmartillerie - Geschichte einer Waffengattung
    portal-militaergeschichte.de/s...
    -Websites & Links-
    web.archive.org/save/_embed/ht...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiwi_(v...)
    portal-militaergeschichte.de/w...
    www.diedeutschewehrmacht.de/Pa...
    www.panther1944.de/index.php/d...
    --Song---
    Ethan Meixsell - Demilitarized Zone (the Irony :D)
    #Panzergrenadier,#TOE,#Organization

КОМЕНТАРІ • 323

  • @Ralphieboy
    @Ralphieboy 4 роки тому +314

    This stuff is pure gold for wargamers wanting to organize realistic units.

    • @Flow95
      @Flow95 3 роки тому +8

      It most certainly has helped me in my ALiVE factions for Arma 3.

    • @Sam-tc8ic
      @Sam-tc8ic 3 роки тому +9

      I'm literately watching this to make the 17th PzGr Div

    • @projectpitchfork860
      @projectpitchfork860 3 роки тому +7

      @@Sam-tc8ic Do you mean the 17. Ss-Panzergrenadierdivision „Götz von Belingen“? Since there wasn't a 17. Panzergrenadierdivision in the Wehrmacht. If yes, you should know that the Panzergrenadierdivisionen of the Waffen-SS had 15 instead of 14 (motorized infantey) companies, although that doesn't matter in Hoi4 for example, and an additional machine gun, anti-air and supply batallion.

    • @Oscuros
      @Oscuros 3 роки тому +6

      You can get TOEs and OOBs in "books", that's where I used to get my info for tabletop before there was an internet.

    • @angelamagnus6615
      @angelamagnus6615 3 роки тому +1

      I did this in HOI4 a lot

  • @jsma9999
    @jsma9999 8 років тому +79

    Thank you for this video. I fell of my seat when you said there only 7 Haft track in Division.

    • @gunnar6674
      @gunnar6674 7 років тому +35

      It's like a parachute division with only 30 parachutes between them - morale naming.

    • @smartlp3010
      @smartlp3010 6 років тому +1

      James m Because...?

    • @phillipgollins6616
      @phillipgollins6616 5 років тому +1

      james m ooo9 lo oo9

    • @Ralphieboy
      @Ralphieboy 3 роки тому +6

      Yes, I knew that half tracks were in short supply, but that also surprised me.

  • @jayg1438
    @jayg1438 6 років тому +68

    your channel is outstanding. I am a history buff an still learn a lot from your channel. well done and subbed.

    • @WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS
      @WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS 2 роки тому

      They tended to leg it unless they had proper support.

    • @BigboiiTone
      @BigboiiTone Рік тому

      I find that the more I learn the more I realise I'm still just getting started learning about history

  • @ottovalkamo1
    @ottovalkamo1 4 роки тому +40

    School: Social studies test at 9:00
    Me at 2:08 in the morning: Panzergrenadierdivision 1944 composition

    • @Ralphieboy
      @Ralphieboy 3 роки тому +3

      Yes, some people fall asleep counting sheep, I fall asleep counting organizational tables...

    • @ComfortsSpecter
      @ComfortsSpecter 27 днів тому

      Frankly a Better Learning Experience

  • @jjab99
    @jjab99 8 років тому +31

    Many thanks for taking the time to make these videos, they are very interesting and informative.

  • @munderpool
    @munderpool 7 років тому +34

    I just discovered your site today, and may I say, Bravo! I've been a wargamer since 1972, and read military history since I could read! This information would probably leave the average person staring like a deer in the headlights, but I truly enjoy your work. Thank you.

  • @BeFlightFilms
    @BeFlightFilms 8 років тому +315

    StuG Life

  • @gammainc1666
    @gammainc1666 7 років тому +10

    I've just found your channel, and as a fledgling re-enactor for the 9th 'Hohenstaufen' this is helping me brush up on my history very well. Thank you and keep up the good work.

  • @keithmassey3035
    @keithmassey3035 7 років тому +1

    Excellent video! Thanks for sharing this fascinating information.

  • @TomTheSiberianHusky
    @TomTheSiberianHusky 2 роки тому +5

    4:00 I think you meant *sevety-seven* half-tracks - the 1943 figures averaged them at 77 so I'm guessing that's where you got that number from. 15,252 SdKfz 251 halftracks were manufactured *alone* let alone the other variants. Oh, and SUBSCRIBED. I love your informative videos, you answer so many questions I've always had. I think it's great that you are showing us the German perspective as a German yourself having done your research, it's rare to see and thus you're much more credible than others. Danke!

  • @terrabeg
    @terrabeg 8 років тому +6

    Excellent information, thank you very much!!

  • @panzerfaust3607
    @panzerfaust3607 8 років тому +16

    Very interesting video, as always.
    So the assault guns were StuG 3s, despite the fact that they were now equipped with AT guns? Were the older models still used in 1944? Was their main task still engaging infantry and fortifications? And with such a large number of them built, how often, if ever, would they replace the basic tank destroyers(I assume Jagdpanzer 4s) in The 1944 MID?

    • @dubsy1026
      @dubsy1026 8 років тому +6

      the long 75 could still fire effective HE

  • @leanbean8962
    @leanbean8962 7 років тому +39

    this is a awsome vid,your accent is thicker than hitler's mustache but im fine whit that. keep up the great vids man

  • @etwas013
    @etwas013 8 років тому +2

    Wonderful work, thanks.

  • @sylvainfalquet6350
    @sylvainfalquet6350 8 років тому +67

    could u do a late war heavy tank abietelung (probably spelled that wrong but I think it means group)?

  • @kyleb308
    @kyleb308 7 років тому +1

    Very interesting, you do quite a good job at this my friend! :)

  • @DC_10
    @DC_10 3 роки тому +1

    I was just reading the memoir of General Hoth about the Army Group Center and his 3rd Panzer and having the question on the difference between Motorized division and Panzer division. And here is your video answering my question... :-) thank you!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому

      I would highly recommend to not read any memoirs unless you know the subject way better, these memoirs are usually full of errors etc. and thus might lead to many myths. For more information see these videos:
      ua-cam.com/video/UTgf3UHMBjY/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/6FoiU_jkL0Q/v-deo.html

  • @TheRomanRuler
    @TheRomanRuler 7 років тому +8

    Please do video about Volksgrenadiers, nobody ever seems to remember that they were very different from infantry and Volksturm.

  • @SomeRoofKorean
    @SomeRoofKorean 3 роки тому

    Awesome, love this content!

  • @hellfire6237
    @hellfire6237 8 років тому

    Great video! I was wondering if you are planning to do a video on a Panzerabteilung (oh god I hope I spelled that right) and perhaps a schwere Panzerabteilungen.

  • @MakeMeThinkAgain
    @MakeMeThinkAgain 8 років тому +10

    Very interesting about the equipment. I didn't know they were mostly trucks.

    • @dirkusmaximus9268
      @dirkusmaximus9268 4 роки тому +1

      MakeMeThinkAgain Opel Blitz, and some French BauteLKW

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 3 роки тому +1

      @ MakeMeThinkAgain Many of the trucks were seized from occupied Western Europe and not suitable for military operations in the East.

  • @TalabAlSahra
    @TalabAlSahra 5 років тому +1

    I’ve always loved the half tracks.

  • @WiiPlayPCToo
    @WiiPlayPCToo 8 років тому +1

    Awesome video! I was wondering if you were planning on making a video about the Winter War. I know you covered it briefly during your original Barbarossa video but I feel it's often overshadowed by WWII and I've always been interested in learning more in depth information about the tactics used and the composition of the division's during the conflict. Thanks!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +4

      Winter War is probably the most asked topic here, yeah, I will cover it :) but may take a while. (Basically I have no knowledge about it and no sources.)

    • @WiiPlayPCToo
      @WiiPlayPCToo 8 років тому +1

      +Military History Visualized Great, I'll look forward to it! I'm sure you'll find a way to slip in a Talvisota-Sabaton reference ;)

  • @0utc4st1985
    @0utc4st1985 8 років тому +71

    How many baguettewerfers was each Panziergrenadier division equipped with? :)

    • @tanaymehta4529
      @tanaymehta4529 3 роки тому +5

      About 1940

    • @Ralphieboy
      @Ralphieboy 3 роки тому +5

      They were part of the Bakery Company, although later units switched to Pumpernickelwerfer.

  • @5thgajones698
    @5thgajones698 8 років тому +2

    Good stuff man

  • @theblackmagician758
    @theblackmagician758 6 років тому

    PLEASE do more Videos like this for HOI4. I love this SOOOO much!

  • @Oscuros
    @Oscuros 3 роки тому

    There were schutzen regiments early on too, light green waffenfarbe, we get examples with 5th leichte, also motorised.

  • @thecanadiankiwibirb4512
    @thecanadiankiwibirb4512 5 років тому +1

    This was outstanding!

  • @tekis0
    @tekis0 6 років тому

    Very informative!

  • @kovi567
    @kovi567 Рік тому

    Are there any sites that show the organization on EVERY level up to division? Like starting with squads, then platoons, companies, etc. for all the unit types in a division.

  • @lets_talk_dinosaurs
    @lets_talk_dinosaurs 7 років тому

    Where do you find the primary sources for information of World War II Military Tactics? So far I have only been able to find Secondary Sources.

  • @ODST6262
    @ODST6262 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you for answering my question on whether any of the six panzergrenadier battalions had half-tracks. Apparently not. Note that two of the panzergrenadier companies in the reconnaissance battalion order of battle may be wrong. That may be a light wheeled company - on Kubelwagon or Swimmenwagon; a light armored panzergrenadier company using 250/x half-tracks, and a medium armored company using 251/x half-tracks. I don't believe all three were trucked. The heavy weapon company could have 8 81mm mortars in 251/2 or 4 towed 12cm mortars and six 251/9 half-tracks. The assaultgun battalion was a tank battalion but few of the Panzergrenadier Divisions actually received tanks. They were issued assaultguns instead. 3rd Pzgr Div in Italy for example. The six 15cm Infantry guns in each PzGr Regiment could have been towed but more likely were Grillie SP 15cm SIG33. The Pioneer Battalion usually had one company in medium SPW and two trucked. I believe the 18 flamethrowers were all back-pack although there may have been up to six 251/16 in the Panzergrenadier Regiment HQ or in the Pioneer Battalion. The motorcycles in the 1939 division were cut because each Motorized Rifle Regiment plus the Division in 1939 had a motorcycle battalion of infantry. These ended up absorbed into the Armored Reconnaissance Battalion. Too much maintenance, too much fuel, and not really usable on the East Front except in the summer. The remainder were mostly for use as messengers.
    The difference in AA between 1939 and 1944 was really striking although you might check that. I think the Luftwaffe was required to assign Panzer Divisions a Luftwaffe Flak battalion in the early war years. Possibly the Motorized Infantry Divisions as well. The Army introduced their own Flak battalions in 1942 I think. The 10 armored Sd Kfz 251/17 often seen online and in early books on German SP flak with fold down sides were for the Luftwaffe ground units and only those ten built. Not sure if the HG Panzer Parachute Division received them. Might have been one of the Luftwaffe Field Divisions.
    The added MP-40 were likely MP-40. The Sturmgewehr 44 were issued mostly to the Volksgrenadier Divisions. Going from 1 SMG per squad to 2 per squad would account for a large number of added MP40 since the motorcycle troops wouldn't have more than 1 per squad and the new reconnaissance battalions 3 companies with 2 per squad. StuG would have one or two each as well.

  • @PotatoBearRawr
    @PotatoBearRawr 8 років тому +1

    Super video! Keep them coming :)
    IIRC then what we call a mechanised NATO infantry division today is comparable to a German WWII panzer division (part of this is because small countries will not have tanks enough to field armoured units at a size, where they can be effective independent strategic fighting units).
    As it will usually mean all units are at least motorised, one of the largest sub units (depending on size that can be regiment or brigade - American division are sometime 40k+) is considered armoured (fighting vehicles and tanks), and you have about a battalion of tanks.
    When your armoured divisions are really mech. inf., then it also makes sense to confuse the enemy by referring to your mot. inf. as mech. inf.
    I also seem to remember that to be classified as a Pz. division late in the war, then you just needed a single armoured unit. The standards for this dropped so much towards the end that a division could be called a Pz division if it had just a 4 tanks platoon. Is this accurate?

  • @vladimirmakarovka.ch.7077
    @vladimirmakarovka.ch.7077 3 роки тому

    Good content keep going bruhh

  • @TheZabbiemaster
    @TheZabbiemaster 8 років тому +1

    very interesting, when will you discuss tactics?

  • @paxofpayne
    @paxofpayne 8 років тому +4

    Great work , Sir can u please do one on the NZ 2nd division of world war two , i heard by the end of the war it was the size of a corps.

  • @jemb67
    @jemb67 7 років тому +3

    Loving these - vielen dank! However, you say the number of AT guns decreased from '39 to '44. Each of the 6 grenadier battalions had a platoon of 6 in its heavy company, so there were another 36 (and those were 75mm - in the KStN, anyway!)

  • @Duececoupe
    @Duececoupe 6 років тому

    Liked the video before it even started! 😉👍👌👏

  • @mikeltelleria1831
    @mikeltelleria1831 6 років тому

    were the SPWs upgunned with weapons such as the PzB 41, 37mm pak and 75mm added to panzergrenadier regiments or to special abteilungen of the division?

  • @CrazySC833
    @CrazySC833 6 років тому +10

    I didn't choose the StuG life, StuG life chose me.

  • @Kanovskiy
    @Kanovskiy 7 років тому

    Hi, can you do specialized units like Grossdeutschland? And why you focus in PzGren Div 44 if it was only used for a short time as you say? you should have explained the type 43 more and not just the number of weapons and men but how where they organized in companies, platoons, squads.

  • @thofmeijer
    @thofmeijer 7 років тому

    Thanks for this video, there is so much 'hear say' and other bollox around on youtube. Its nice to get some facs now and then.

  • @sethbaines2615
    @sethbaines2615 5 років тому

    Can you do the Panzer-Lehr-Division??? Maybe even go over what they specifically used

  • @marcinex46
    @marcinex46 8 років тому

    Will you make video of designing divisions in HOI IV? Cause when I look on your video "Panzergrenadier-Division & Motorized Infantry Division 1939/1944" I have problem to ... well to copy that pattern into HOI IV division designer.

    • @Oliolli3
      @Oliolli3 8 років тому +2

      12:13 He addresses this.

  • @domintetarus7840
    @domintetarus7840 8 років тому

    do you think the SP ART in HOI 4 represents something closer to the Stugs or something like SP heavy arty such as the Wespe and the like?

    • @Oliolli3
      @Oliolli3 8 років тому

      More like the Wespe. StuGs are more likely to fall under tank destroyers. Of course, it may depend on the model of SP ART, as light SP ART and heavy SP ART may be very different.
      At least the pre-named models you can research in the tech tree have the Wespe as being Light SP ART based on the Pz II, and the StuG III is a Medium Tank Destroyer based on the Pz III.

  • @etiennechevalier5615
    @etiennechevalier5615 7 років тому

    Very good work !
    Clear and nice use of cognitive tools (colors & icons)
    Useful to me as I'm creating a board game about WW2.
    I have a question :
    There seems to be an official distinction between Assault Guns and Tank Destroyers in the terminology.
    But as Stug III ausf G were mostly built and not that many StuH 42, were the Stug III both used as AG and TD in reality ?
    I mean most of the time.
    Thank you

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +2

      yeah, one could say an assault gun was often also used as a tank destroyer, whereas a tank destroyer was more dedicated. Also in case of Germany, the assault guns were party of the artillery branch namely the assault artillery and not the tank branch. The StuH was the implies was an assault howitzer. You can find more information for that in my video about the assault artillery btw: ua-cam.com/video/tFXZcC1xZnI/v-deo.html

  • @DerGoor
    @DerGoor 3 роки тому

    Hallo Herr Kast, wäre es möglich eine aktuelle PzDiv (bspw. PzDiv 1) der BRD mit der PzDiv 45 der WM zu vergleichen? Danke!

  • @diehard2705
    @diehard2705 6 років тому +2

    Can you do a video on the company scale version of this? How many men would be in a company of Panzergrenadiers and what they did? (Also were the SS panzergrenadier's set up the same way, or were hey organized different?)

    • @ODST6262
      @ODST6262 3 роки тому +1

      SS motorized were set up the same way although they had StuG III (short barreled) in the Division from the first. Six then 18 then 31. Panzergrenadier SS Divisions 1-3 though set up this way in 1943 converted from motorized infantry divisions (with a 31 StuG battalion) also had a Panzer Regiment (2 BN 3 light (Pz III) and 1 medium (Pz IV) plus 1 Tiger I company, the 31 StuG III, a Panzerjager battalion with 2 Coy Marders and 1 of towed Pak. The six Panzergrenadier battalions had one battalion in 251 and the rest trucks. This was 1943 and these were actually Panzer Divisions. The 1944 SS Panzer Divisions were set up this way with the Panzer BN having one BN of Panzer IV/H and one of Panthers. 5th and 12th SS were set up this way. 9th and 10th were supposed to be but their Panzer IV battalions were half StuG III/G and half Pz IV/H and one of them arrived back in Normandy without its Panther battalion. The Panzerjager in 12th SS were Panzerjager IV/L48 by '44. 1st and 2nd SS lost their Tigers but 3rd SS kept theirs. 12th and 1st SS were made SS Panzer Korps I with a Nebelwerfer BN and Tiger BN 101 as Corps troops. SS Panzer Korps II with a Nebelwerfer BN and Tiger BN 102 was formed in '44. SS Panzer Korps III with Tiger BN 503 (SS 101 became SS 501 and SS 102 became SS 502 before Dec 16 '44) was formed in 1945 I think. 5th SS Panzer and FHH Panzer Division I think.
      Osprey has excellent books on the Panzer Divisions 1939-1940, 1941-1943, and 1944-45 as well as the Panzergrenadier Divisions.

  • @gamer-bewerter9909
    @gamer-bewerter9909 5 років тому

    Kannst du mal bitte ein Video im Allgemeinen darüber machen, wie eine Kompanie, ein Bataillon, Regiment, Division, Trupp usw. aufgebaut sind? Also wie viel Mann so die Einheiten hatten, welcher Rang was geführt hat, und wie die aufgebaut waren, also so wie du es in etwa schon machst(eine Division hat... Bataillone,... Kompanien,... Trupps, keine Ahnung was sonst noch). Ich verstehe das ehrlich gesagt nicht so richtig...

  • @Ts5EVER
    @Ts5EVER 7 років тому

    Nice, but one little nitpick: the increase in "Maschinenpistolen" in the 44 version was not about additional MP40s, instead they meant the MP44 (later StG44). In late 1944 most German infantry divisions were supposed to get a lot of these.

  • @DS-61-2
    @DS-61-2 5 років тому

    I have a question maybe you can help with, I am building 1/35 scale German Panzergrenadier Company the picture included with model says indicates the HQ Company had 2 Sd.Kfz 250, a BMW motorcycle with side car and 3 zundapp motorcycles. The company has 4 platoons the first 3 are the same the platoon leader 251/10 followed by 3 251/1’s. The last platoon named the heavy armored platoon consist of 1 Sd.kfz 251/3, 2 Sd.Kfz 251/2, and 2 of the 251/1 sporting heavy machine M.G I know by the picture it’s not your typical M.G.42 or 34.
    So could you shed some light on what the other heavy M.G. Might be, and the Sd.Kfz 250’s for the HQ would those be the 250/3 radio cars? Any insight would be helpful

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  5 років тому

      such a detailed question is likely even too much for my Oberst supporters: patreon.com/mhv

    • @ODST6262
      @ODST6262 3 роки тому

      HQ were more likely a 250/1 and a 251/3 (radio vehicle) or a 251/1 and 251/3. The 251/3 in the heavy weapons allowed it to be used as an artillery fire direction center for the mortars in the 251/2. Later 2 x 251/9 with 75L24 (the early Mark IV tank guns) were added and they could also be directed in indirect fire although they usually were used as infantry gun support firing direct. The 251/1 heavy machinegun half-tracks are 251/1s. The "s" is for heavy (in German). They had a special mount on them, no MG shield and also carried a second MG34 team with a MG34. They carried two tripods, one for each machinegun so dismounted you get two heavy (WWII term - Medium MG in modern terminology) teams from each half-track. The special mount allowed one of the MG34 from the HMG teams to be mounted on the half-track used as a HMG (modern MMG) from the half-track. The standard MG34 mount behind a gun shield at the front of the passenger compartment was equivalent to a LMG mount. The 251/1s did not have one of these.

  • @hs2ktc
    @hs2ktc 7 років тому +2

    this guy ROCKS

  • @Wien1938
    @Wien1938 5 років тому

    A point to note is that the third Inf.Rgt (mot.) was removed after the Polish campaign because it was found the Inf.Div(mot.) was too unwieldy and would clog up the road network. So it was reduced to two regiments of three battalions - compare to a 1941 Pz Div. with 2-3 Pz Bns and 4 Inf Bns. The combat/manoeuvre size of both was optimised at 6-7 major units - the recon would often act as an additional unit but the engineers were usually split up to support different battle-groups.

  • @thurbine2411
    @thurbine2411 2 роки тому

    Were all personnel in the infantry regiments combat personnel or were there support personnel for each regiment as well?

  • @jan-alexanderpelz1649
    @jan-alexanderpelz1649 7 років тому +20

    Es ist kein Mensch, es ist kein Tier, es ist ein deutscher Panzer Grenadier!

    • @AqierDesigns
      @AqierDesigns 6 років тому

      Jan-Alexander Pelz musst deutscher oder panzer weg lassen damites von den silben her aufgeht. :)

  • @raylast3873
    @raylast3873 3 роки тому

    So...what was that observation batallion actually doing and what kind of equipment did they have. Did they get blimps? ;D

  • @FarmingtonS9
    @FarmingtonS9 8 років тому

    What do you use to create the background animations?

  • @shogun242424
    @shogun242424 8 років тому

    Good one. So what is your division setup for HoI4?

  • @kitkat9322
    @kitkat9322 7 років тому

    May I ask where you get these beautiful drawings for your thumbnails?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому

      made them myself

    • @kitkat9322
      @kitkat9322 7 років тому

      Military History Visualized I must say you have beautiful drawing skills then, well done.

    • @OkOk-nl5xk
      @OkOk-nl5xk 3 роки тому

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Can you make a tutorial video on how to make them?

  • @ericcook1201
    @ericcook1201 7 років тому +1

    A number of years ago, I spoke to a US WW2 veteran who said that they didn't fear the Fallschirmjäger so much as the Panzer Grenadiers. So, my question is,other than actual infantry tactics used by the Pz.Gren, what was the actual element within those units that was so effective and, apparently... frightening? Was it due to the amount/placement of mobile artillery? Did they usually have their SP guns and Panzerjäger units ready for (or to cause?) the breakthrough? It seems like all of those but I've never really been able to grasp it due to all the "myths",I guess.
    Danke!!

  • @georgeschell4533
    @georgeschell4533 7 років тому +4

    This is an excellent series. The information is great. I am an avid war gamer and model builder. Could you give detailed information on the TO&E of a Armored Artillery Regiment assigned to panzer divisions, for the latter war years? I am mostly interested in the Observation unit. For example: How many PZ Beob Wg Panther V tanks were assigned ? How many SP guns per battery, were there communications vehicles with each battery? Thank you in advance!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      thank you, well, my organization videos aren't really so successful sadly, but I have two approaches that will bring them back a bit more. About the Observation unit, not sure if I have enough data on it, personally I would be also interested in taking a closer look, but first I got to pay the bills. Hopefully there is something in the Field Artillery book from Bailey(?) or there is something useful in US Field Manual, not sure there is a "Reibert" on this.

    • @WildBillCox13
      @WildBillCox13 6 років тому

      You might check The Handbook of the German Armored Forces (Indiana university press) for detailed organization data. This reprinted collection of wartime intelligence updates and familiarisations well chronicles the evolution of the Panzeraffe in equipment, training, organization, employment, and over time.

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 8 років тому

    "StuG Life". Good one, man.

  • @MonMalthias
    @MonMalthias 7 років тому +5

    Would it be possible to do a video comparing WW2 era infantry small unit tactics and organisation between nations? Comparing, say, a German squad against a British section against a Russian squad.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      at some point yes, but first I want to cover at least the basics of one country. Right now the videos are mostly about creating a strong foundation of basic knowledge in order to do more advanced videos like comparisons in the future. After all before 2016 I never looked at a division organization.

  • @dishchicken
    @dishchicken 4 роки тому

    Did Panzergrenadiers wear different color uniforms than the standard infantry? I ask because I paint 1/35 figures and might get Panzergrenadiers and would like to know hot to paint them.

  • @remc70
    @remc70 5 років тому +1

    you should do one on doing paper work and getting the mail up to the front.

  • @Rubashow
    @Rubashow 8 років тому +11

    Why is the number of NCOs so high compared to the number of fielded personell? 2600 NCOs on 16000 men is a ratio of 6:1. This appears strange to me. Could you elaborate?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +26

      I don't know that yet, but the number of NCOs increased even more for the 1944 division. The NCOs are the backbone of every army and they know how to implement and lead directly, but so far I haven't read anything particular about this topic, but I will definitely cover that topic in the future. After all questions from Subscribers and my own often provide very interesting topics.

    • @Rubashow
      @Rubashow 8 років тому +1

      Military History Visualized Looking forward to it.

    • @arumatai
      @arumatai 8 років тому +10

      i guess it's because of the high number of vehicles and cannons that would probably have a commander each

    • @Treblaine
      @Treblaine 8 років тому +10

      NCOs are sergeants and corporals, right? It shouldn't be a surprise that there's a sergeant and corporal in each 8 man squad/section.

    • @hjorturerlend
      @hjorturerlend 8 років тому +10

      The squad size of the motorized infantry was 14, later 12, not 8. Two 3-man machine gun teams, a rifle squad/team and NCO.
      The Germans, wisely, invested a lot into their NCO´s - you could say that superior NCO´s is what kept the Wehrmacht capable for the latter third of the war, reducing the effect of the decreased training of the enlisted men (and boys).

  • @dankuhlman8362
    @dankuhlman8362 4 роки тому +1

    "667" men in the Supply Units - "Neighbor of the Beast" - well played!

  • @joechang8696
    @joechang8696 3 роки тому

    In the Barbarossa phase, the German armor theory was to penetrate deep and cause disruption with logistics, support infrastructure, and also in the assembly of reserves brought from districts far away. The composition of the armor corps varied in part due to what was available. One example is a corps with 1 Panzer division, 1 motorized division and 1 infantry division. I am thinking the Panzer division should be able to attack and defeat any enemy division, infantry or armor, they encounter, and the infantry division is mostly to occupy the supply route. From your description here, I am thinking the motorized infantry division can defend against an attack by an enemy armor division, but would not be used to attack enemy armor.

  • @Franz-141
    @Franz-141 8 років тому +2

    Will you do something about military tactics in future?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому

      yeah, already did a small part once. (US Army Inf. Battalion)

    • @Franz-141
      @Franz-141 8 років тому +1

      +Military History Visualized yeah i know that,that is the first video i saw on your channel.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +1

      I assume there will be a tactics or at least defensive position video in the next 2-8 weeks.

    • @Franz-141
      @Franz-141 8 років тому

      +Military History Visualized Cool! Thank you.

  • @sarmatiancougar7556
    @sarmatiancougar7556 8 років тому

    Sir, can you, please, clarify something?
    It remains unclear were those assault guns Stug-3 and Stug-4 or have they been replaced with more fitting StuH-42, Brummbär and other assault guns.
    That's all about classification, because Stug-3 and 4 were classified as sturmgeschutze, though having StuK-40 75mm guns, unlike other assault guns which had howitzers.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +1

      stug 3, the tank destroyers were pz4 chassis. StuK 75mm.

    • @sarmatiancougar7556
      @sarmatiancougar7556 8 років тому

      +Military History Visualized so, the vast majority of the assault guns were just Stug-3, not the late heavy assault guns?

  • @luiscorzojr_1814
    @luiscorzojr_1814 7 років тому

    How many halftracks were used in operation Barbarossa?

  • @torbai
    @torbai 6 років тому

    How many trucks were there in a panzergrenadier division 1944?

  • @od1452
    @od1452 5 років тому

    How often Were the units at strength?

  • @Ostheim
    @Ostheim 8 місяців тому

    Did the Panzer-Grenadier Divisions remain close or the same between 1941-1943?

  • @CAP198462
    @CAP198462 7 років тому

    Also, frag ich dir, was ist verschiedene zwischen gepanzerte und motorisiert? Ist noch ein alter oder etwas andere?

  • @veryverymike
    @veryverymike 6 років тому

    How you would translate this in hoi4?

  • @Temekin
    @Temekin 5 років тому

    I've a question, this 1939 layout would be the one used by the 4 motorized division Germany had by the start of the war, yes? Well, Niehorster has listed manpower and equipment according to the 39/40 mobilization plan here niehorster.org/011_germany/39_organ_army/39_lt-01.html (That's the 1. leichte for an example). What I'm wondering is, why do the numbers vary so much between sources? For instance, you mention that the 39 mot. div. had only 31 SMG's, whereas according to Niehorster the division would have had an average of 198 (I calculated the average between the 4 divisions) SMG's. Who should I trust here if I intend to find out the actual strength of the average motorized division on field by the start of the war?
    Cheers for the video, never imagined there'd be a source to contradict Niehorster!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  5 років тому

      a light division is NOT a motorized division... wait what? Why bring you in the Leichte Division, when it is not about it at all?
      Please reformulate your question to exactly what the problem is, because I have no time for second guessing what you actually meant.

    • @Temekin
      @Temekin 5 років тому +1

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Ah shit, for some reason I was under the impression that a leichte division meant a motorized division. My bad, now the sources are matching, sorry for wasting your time.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  5 років тому

      no worries. Yeah, leichte Divisions are a bit of an annoyance and can be confusing. Usually people count them as Panzer divisions. This would also make sense, since the SMGs were often used in Panzers if I remember correctly.

  • @tekis0
    @tekis0 2 роки тому

    Hello: I didn't hear any mention of "Luftwaffe liaison officers" for close air support, or for anti-aircraft duties. Maybe that's in part 2? Thank-you.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  2 роки тому +1

      > "Luftwaffe liaison officers" for close air support
      Not 100 % certain, but as the name indicates, he is from the Luftwaffe, so he would not be organic to the division. At least so far I haven't seen a KStN where one was mentioned.

  • @ju87stukab2leevilplane9
    @ju87stukab2leevilplane9 6 років тому

    What the name of the car tank?

  • @archeontheeverchosenlordof3633
    @archeontheeverchosenlordof3633 8 років тому +1

    that Iron Maiden reference though

  • @Subparhornet
    @Subparhornet 4 роки тому

    Which unit control the trucks carrying the Grenadiers? I don't see a truck company at divisional level.

  • @shroder2748
    @shroder2748 3 роки тому

    Military history: shows chart and explains everything
    Me:
    *despair*

  • @andrewmaloney4690
    @andrewmaloney4690 3 роки тому

    combat width on these??

  • @dennisweidner288
    @dennisweidner288 3 роки тому

    Excellent and needed presentation. So many people and not just Russians are convinced that the War in the West was just a side show if little importance. Notice how people making that argument always talk about MANPOWER. And here they are correct. But manpower is not the only measure of military power. One reason the Ostheer was unmotorized infantry was that most of German industry had to be used to support the war in the west. It does not take much industry to build a horse cart. It takes a great deal of industry to build aircraft and ships/U-boats, not to mention V-weapons. The Ostkrieg was the decisive campaign of the War. But the War in the West meant that Hitler could never fully equipped the German Ostkrieg, let alone the allied units. www.histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/air/eur/sbc/eco/sbc-gie.html

  • @zhz5178
    @zhz5178 2 роки тому

    Rommel is back and he has a channel

  • @Scattman101
    @Scattman101 8 років тому

    Are you gonna do a video on Tiger tanks in the German military? I.e. how they were deployed or how many were used in Divisions etc. Tigers are my favorite thing about ww2 Germany!

  • @alanch90
    @alanch90 7 років тому

    would appreciate if you made videos like this one on the red army organization during interwar and ww2

  • @ovejustin
    @ovejustin 7 років тому

    What is a 1944 PzGren squad equipped with? same 7 rifles, 1 SMG, 1 MG?

    • @arminkohler2918
      @arminkohler2918 7 років тому

      7 Rifles, 1 SMG, 1 MG Yeah. However one or two soldiers had any mean of anti-tank warfare. Such as an Panzerschreck or a Panzerfaust

    • @hjorturerlend
      @hjorturerlend 7 років тому

      2 MGs, 1(+) SMG and and 9 rifles. actually. The 1939-1942 ones had 1 SMG, 1 MG, 2 pistols (loader and gunner) and 7 rifles, just like regular infantry. They started to organize the battalions in a manner similar to the Pz. Grenadiers of the panzer divisions in early 42.

  • @user-sj9jr5eg4m
    @user-sj9jr5eg4m 7 років тому +4

    Your german spelling sounds like you are a German yourself. If so you should do a second channel on german..would be a nice gift for the channels over here. Greetings from Mannheim. :)

    • @Phunny
      @Phunny 7 років тому +6

      Fucko Yourselfo He's Austrian.

  • @fren183
    @fren183 7 років тому +1

    Hoi4 division template please?

  • @traffic800
    @traffic800 7 років тому

    I was wondering why you put the artillery dots on top of the tank destroyer and heavy anti tank unit counters. Just curious.

  • @DBSG1976
    @DBSG1976 7 років тому

    Any chance of a Feldgendamie

  • @Ruebacca
    @Ruebacca 8 років тому

    So the Artillery observer unit was moved to Army Command. Does that mean the 4th Army for example would have an artillery observer unit attached to it's command battalion?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому

      so far I need to look into how this army unit (Heerestruppe) system really worked. As far as I know it was in a pool and got allocated to divisions if needed.

  • @patrickwentz8413
    @patrickwentz8413 4 роки тому

    if you read the Forgotten Soldier he was in a motorized regiment but after 1944 they no longer had trucks so they marched everywhere....

  • @matshagglund3550
    @matshagglund3550 6 років тому

    It's pretty hard to find statistics of motorized infantry divisions in certain period, for instance early 1944. Then it's difficult to find numbers how much these units actually had tank destroyers and assault guns. I doubt did many of motorized infantry divisions have 31 tank destroyers and 42 assault guns. More likely they had hardly more than half of those numbers even if counting those in work shops.

  • @gianlucacittadino9373
    @gianlucacittadino9373 8 років тому +37

    Are you Austrian or German?

    • @FrazzP
      @FrazzP 8 років тому +20

      I think he said that he's Austrian.

    • @Godzillant
      @Godzillant 8 років тому +13

      austrian living in germany i think

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +76

      Austrian who until recently lived in Germany and returned to Austria. It's complicated ;)

    • @darthcalanil5333
      @darthcalanil5333 8 років тому +16

      Military History Visualized but does is matter anyway? we love you regardless :)

    • @RonDuligi
      @RonDuligi 8 років тому +10

      I love Austria. I'm Irish but I've been a few times. It's beautiful throughout all of the seasons
      I particularly like the mountains around Innsbruck :)
      The people are great and seem to take great pride in keeping their surroundings clean and pristine. I saw a tourist discard a cigarette butt and someone, who I assumed was a native, picked it up and followed until she caught up with him and asked him to put it in the bin.

  • @williamcameron9019
    @williamcameron9019 8 років тому

    would there be much difference between a panzer grenadier division 1944 compared to a SS-Panzergrenadier-Division 1944 ?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  8 років тому +1

      not sure, haven't looked into the later ones and since youtube demonetizes even the regular military history videos, I won't touch the ss, especially not with German/Austrian sjw-politics that can't tell the difference between a door and a star destroyer.

    • @williamcameron9019
      @williamcameron9019 8 років тому

      agreed, well thank you for the response looks like i'll have to do some research now lol.

  • @trihodron3332
    @trihodron3332 6 років тому +1

    This is so difficult

  • @Usmodlover
    @Usmodlover 8 років тому

    Woop woop! That's neighbor of the beast!

  • @StefanRamsen
    @StefanRamsen 6 років тому

    10:55