Invasion of Poland 1939 - Fall Weiß - Case White

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2016
  • The German Invasion of Poland in 1939 started the Second World War in Europe. The German name of operation was “Fall Weiß” meaning “Case White”. In this video I will take a look at the major German troop movements, the Soviet Invasion of Poland, the losses and a final assessment.
    »» GET OUR BOOKS ««
    » The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - sturmzug.com
    » Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com
    »» SUPPORT MHV ««
    » patreon - see videos early (adfree) - / mhv
    » subscribe star - www.subscribestar.com/mhv
    » paypal donation - paypal.me/mhvis
    » UA-cam Membership - / @militaryhistoryvisual...
    »» MERCHANDISE ««
    » teespring - teespring.com/stores/military...
    » SOURCES «
    Maier, Klaus; Rohde, Horst; Stegemann, Bernd; Umbreit, Hans: Die Errichtung der Hegemonie auf dem europäischen Kontient. Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg (DR2WK), Band 2.
    Müller, Rolf-Dieter: Hitlers Wehrmacht, 1935-1945
    Zaloga, Steven J. : Poland 1939 - The Birth of Blitzkrieg
    Wettstein, Adrian: Wehrmacht im Stadtkampf
    www.cgsc.edu/CARL/nafziger/939...
    www.cgsc.edu/CARL/nafziger/939...
    niehorster.org/029_poland/1939...
    www.westpoint.edu/history/Site...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_...
    » CREDITS & SPECIAL THX «
    Song: Ethan Meixsell - Demilitarized Zone
    The Counter-Design is heavily inspired by Black ICE Mod for the game Hearts of Iron 3 by Paradox Interactive
    forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/...
    #InvasionOfPoland,#WW2,#CaseWhite

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @BazBattles
    @BazBattles 7 років тому +188

    It's dissapointing how videogame and film industry often "forgot" that WWII started in September of 1939 in Poland (in Europe at least), it's such an interesting theme.

    • @Music_games_history
      @Music_games_history 5 років тому +6

      True, though Cod2 has a mod that adds the invasion of poland and france as mission from the german perspective.

    • @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus
      @RexOlafusVidulusMagnus 3 роки тому +1

      Oh damn, Bazz you have my respect bro (not only for creating great content).

    • @RamRam-kr6gv
      @RamRam-kr6gv 3 роки тому +19

      I think that they never show the invasion of Poland or the fall of France (so anything prior to 1941) because that is when the Germans (the na z is) were winning. Nowadays people would probably try to boycott the movie/game or “cancel” the producers/creators of the game/movie.

    • @jonroberts8396
      @jonroberts8396 2 роки тому

      @@RamRam-kr6gv no, its because most Americans believe the war began with Pearl Harbour and that's where the money for films and games is

    • @hfhfffhfhf
      @hfhfffhfhf Рік тому

      ​@@RamRam-kr6gv I really doubt that. It's because the film would be directed towards French/Polish/German audiences and Hollywood doesn't care about them since they know not many Americans would watch

  • @halnywiatr
    @halnywiatr 7 років тому +204

    Generally a very good and non-partisan report. I would add the following:
    -The Polish mobilization was delayed at the specific request of the French and English to not “provoke” Germany.
    -German territiory was virtually untouched by WWI. Poland was still recovering from the Eastern Front of WWI passing through Poland several times and then the Polish Soviet War (1920).
    -The German GDP was 10 times that of Poland allowing for a higher level of armament.
    -Polish units remained individually effective through September 17. (Battle of Jaworów and the annihilation of the SS-Germania regiment).

    • @xSuperSS
      @xSuperSS 6 років тому +11

      Can you read? Untouched, meaning not raveged by war like western front.

    • @xSuperSS
      @xSuperSS 6 років тому +10

      Poland would never win against Germany and USSR, don't be silly. He had no way to defeat Luftwaffe let alone Panzer divisions.

    • @wonszpoteznybotrocki5140
      @wonszpoteznybotrocki5140 6 років тому +6

      -Mainland Germany
      -Tannenberg (grunwald)
      choose one

    • @vigigejmer9813
      @vigigejmer9813 5 років тому

      Add Mokra battle, Bzura - which was the biggest until the German-Coviet war in 1941, and Kock where for godbye gen. Kleeberg destroyed German motorized division

    • @es8428
      @es8428 3 роки тому

      @@xSuperSS maybe, if they knew that dive bombers were coming. They could have defeated the luftwaffe. The pilots were good (battle of britain).

  • @JaLiberal
    @JaLiberal 7 років тому +44

    Great video! As always.
    By the way Polish High Command knew that Germany would attack but as you said they didn't expect it so early. There were two strategies regarding the defence: ring of defence and total defence of everything. The second one won because Polish leadership was afraid of British and French appeasement towards Germany. The first one was based around abandoning western parts of Poland to concentrate troops on defence of much more defensible areas but the Polish leaders thought that Germans would just stop in these areas and agree with the French and British to annex them. That would leave Poland compleatly dependable on Germany. This fear was based on how the West given up the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. So they chose to defend everything for as long as they could waiting for French and British attack from the west...

    • @DaHuntsman1
      @DaHuntsman1 Рік тому +1

      And then the french and british just sat there =(

    • @jaredjosephsongheng372
      @jaredjosephsongheng372 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@DaHuntsman1
      Hey the French and British did try.
      It was just that well France was France and couldn't do sh*t to penetrate through the Siegfried Line during the not so very known Saarland Offensive.
      They planned another offensive but then the Soviets Attacked so they were like.
      You know what Poland is f*cked.

  • @tiaandeswardt7741
    @tiaandeswardt7741 7 років тому +94

    Congratulations on 50k subs by the way. You deserve every single one

  • @TheImperatorKnight
    @TheImperatorKnight 7 років тому +249

    More details please! I want to know where every battalion was at every moment in the campaign and need 3D animations ;)
    (I'm kidding)

    • @villemaisteri1618
      @villemaisteri1618 7 років тому +19

      TIK that's your job :DD

    • @TheImperatorKnight
      @TheImperatorKnight 7 років тому +23

      Ville metsänmiettijä yeah... I really don't make things easy for myself, do I?

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 7 років тому +18

      Not every battalion every soldier and every vehicle!

    • @TheImperatorKnight
      @TheImperatorKnight 7 років тому +34

      Prince of Orange Every round of ammunition!

    • @malinkaaa
      @malinkaaa 7 років тому +22

      every drop of blood.

  • @randomguy-tg7ok
    @randomguy-tg7ok 7 років тому +113

    The first Polish fort attacked by the Germans only surrendered when they found out Warsaw had fallen.

    • @blasterelforg7276
      @blasterelforg7276 3 роки тому +2

      They denied the German unit which started WW2 with its salvos easy hopes for decoration with an Iron Cross.

    • @randomguy-tg7ok
      @randomguy-tg7ok 3 роки тому +4

      "Let's just give a Battleship an Iron Cross"
      Then again, IIRC it was old enough to legally be of retirement age, so it's not too out of the question.

    • @juri8723
      @juri8723 11 місяців тому

      @@randomguy-tg7okcope 😅 Poland surrendered within a few days

    • @randomguy-tg7ok
      @randomguy-tg7ok 11 місяців тому +1

      Poland did indeed surrender after just over a month (which is more than "a few days", albeit still relatively quick with regards to modern war), but I don't imagine that that was the point I was trying to make.

    • @jaredjosephsongheng372
      @jaredjosephsongheng372 11 місяців тому

      By first polish fort do you mean Hel Peninsula???

  • @13DUH
    @13DUH 7 років тому +76

    8:45 That friendly-fire icon. I see what you did there

  • @slither42
    @slither42 7 років тому +871

    the funny thing is that poland was outnumbered, outgunned, attacked from both sides. and still did better than france and england during the invasion of france in 1940.

    • @VintageLJ
      @VintageLJ 7 років тому +100

      I don't know if you know this, but demanding land in any peacetime offer is so outrageous, that Hitler likely planned for them to deny it. In fact, we know he planned for them to deny it. Siezing Gdansk, (one of the most important and vital cities/port in all of Poland).) would be like France demanding Portsmouth or Poland demanding Konigsberg with the threat of war.

    • @jumpinthefire23
      @jumpinthefire23 7 років тому +42

      How did Poland do better than France? The Battle of France took longer, caused more casualties on the Germans and disabled more German planes and tanks.

    • @slither42
      @slither42 7 років тому +31

      Charles McCarron the length of the russian front compared to the french front was pretty fucking different you dipshit that is not comparable at all...the polish and later the soviets also had nothing comparable to a maginot line...

    • @slither42
      @slither42 7 років тому +9

      Charles McCarron lol piss off you peon.

    • @bubbleffs
      @bubbleffs 7 років тому +129

      Have you considered the strength of armies? French had more troops, far better equipment and a British expedition corps backing them up. In fact, whereas Poland had half of the strength of the German army, French army was, at least theoretically, equal to Germany's. Also compare the distance between the contemporary German borders and Warsaw and between Paris. Warsaw is twice as close. Despite all that, it took Germans almost as long to capture Warsaw than to take Paris. And then France wasn't attacked from behind by another force equal in strength to German army. Also remember that Poland existed as a country for 20 years before WW2, and its territory was even more ruined by WW1 than France's. Having all that in mind, trying to argue that Poland didn't do better is silly. I mean, yeah, more Germans died during the invasion of France, but France's potential was infinitely larger than Poland's back then. You can't just look at raw death count, you have to keep the context in mind.

  • @jancmikowiak6082
    @jancmikowiak6082 6 років тому +6

    Words can't express how much I love your content :D You're one of the most educational, fun, detailed and professional history channels on youtube!

  • @OchotaJack
    @OchotaJack 7 років тому +148

    Although some of your pronounciation made me shaking (It was battle of kotsk not kok ;p) , very good job. tank You!
    PS. love the UK/FR Allies crossed baggete & tea icon!

    • @JoshDaJewishKid
      @JoshDaJewishKid 7 років тому +3

      so did i lol

    • @Avager
      @Avager 7 років тому +6

      I was doing something else while listening to that and heard "Battle of cock", at first I was confused, second later had a burst of laugh.

    • @pluki1357
      @pluki1357 7 років тому +5

      same here :) And also "the battle of BZURA" (not "Buzra"). Good video! Except for the part where the author quotes soviet propaganda about reasons to stab Poland aback by Stalin. Guess it would be better to give real reasons for USSR's cowardly attack rather than repeating propaganda.

    • @christinas.4342
      @christinas.4342 7 років тому

      +pluki1357 So tell us the real reason for the Soviet attack.

    • @Sinistercabbage
      @Sinistercabbage 7 років тому +2

      +Kristina S.
      Spreading revolution through Europe.

  • @witjj7852
    @witjj7852 7 років тому +69

    In early September it came
    A war unknown to the world
    No army may enter that land
    That is protected by polish hand
    Unless you are forty to one
    Your force will soon be undone
    Seemed fitting to post a bit of that song.

    • @salrazz2498
      @salrazz2498 7 років тому +3

      Don't try to be a hero with Sabaton songs. Poland surrendered after 2 weeks.

    • @witjj7852
      @witjj7852 7 років тому +2

      SalrazZ Yeah i know that but like i said it seemed fitting with the video

    • @salrazz2498
      @salrazz2498 7 років тому

      Yeah, maybe it's fitting.

    • @witjj7852
      @witjj7852 7 років тому +1

      SalrazZ My real question is how long have you been scrolling through the comments

    • @witjj7852
      @witjj7852 7 років тому +1

      SalrazZ My real question is how long have you been scrolling through the comments

  • @robynn144
    @robynn144 7 років тому +31

    Just 20 min into WW2 a Polish PZ-P 11.c fighter shot down a Ju 87 "Stuka". First air victory of the war!

  • @stephend50
    @stephend50 7 років тому +75

    crossed baguettes and a cup of tea , France and GB, epic

  • @DZSabre
    @DZSabre 7 років тому +3

    A very good summary. keep up the good work

  • @DesolateGrunt
    @DesolateGrunt 7 років тому +2

    so glad I found your channel, you're the history teacher I always wanted!

  • @MarauderPol
    @MarauderPol 7 років тому +1

    Thanks for the video! Very nicely done and right there for the anniversary :)

  • @marktstanic2352
    @marktstanic2352 7 років тому +5

    You never fail to educate and impress; congrats on 50k subs!

    • @ew3612
      @ew3612 3 роки тому

      616k now. keep it going!

  • @Koksu111
    @Koksu111 7 років тому +14

    The reason that Polish units were underequipped is because germans caught our army in the middle of modernization process. Many old guns trucks and planes were stored or sold because army was awaiting delivery of new, modern ones. Some of our generals negated the possibility of German invasion, so as many of you guys could see by the map,our troop allocation was shit. It's kinda sad to see such wasted opportunities when we really could have done much better. Great video as always, cheers!

    • @GQ1123ja
      @GQ1123ja 7 років тому +2

      you still would have lost.....might have delayed it weeks thats it

    • @Koksu111
      @Koksu111 7 років тому +6

      Creole Supreme Of course we would, the simple fact that we would be under attack by 2 big powers was enough. Hell, I doubt UK or France would hold out hyphotetical attack by USSR and Nazi Germany at once.

    • @GQ1123ja
      @GQ1123ja 7 років тому +2

      Commander when the USSR attacked the war was already lost and from what i read the USSR did terrible couldn't even reach some of there marked points like in Finland.

    • @Koksu111
      @Koksu111 7 років тому +2

      Creole Supreme That's not entirely true. Germans were a bit faster from the simple fact that they were already in the war at the time. Soviets did gain much ground and territory, and they lost in Finland due to topography of the Karelia and Finnish using this geographical advantage wisely. They were also unprepared for the combat in such enviorement (thanks to papa Stalin, he thought war would be fast and easy victory. You never disregard your enemy.) USSR was a deadly enemy, especially when it mobilized it's all industry and manpower (proof - Fate of german invasion in the 1942/1943 period, even without Allies distracting them with Normandy and Sicilly)

    • @Koksu111
      @Koksu111 7 років тому +1

      Creole Supreme OF course our difference may came from different sources of information, just like MHV said. Our information is biased on our favor, their information on their favor. That is a natural thing, but you have to agree with me that USSR wasn't so weak as you think. A 143 million people superpower, united under totalitarian regime and ideology, with powerfull industrial base and very bright engineers. That could'nt end well for Germans and us.

  • @dgerdi
    @dgerdi 7 років тому +2

    Very precise analysis. Thank you.

  • @lowenstaat
    @lowenstaat 7 років тому

    Thanks for a clear and concise debrief about Case White. Very well researched and presented.

  • @TheImperatorKnight
    @TheImperatorKnight 7 років тому +36

    I believe there's a historical debate around whether the invasion of Poland was a true "blitzkrieg" or not. What are your thoughts?

    • @Morrigi192
      @Morrigi192 7 років тому +41

      It used rapid breakthrough and encirclement of the enemy on a strategic scale with mobile units, followed up by infantry, artillery, and airstrikes to finish the job. If that's not blitzkrieg, what is?

    • @TheImperatorKnight
      @TheImperatorKnight 7 років тому +7

      ***** except in Poland the tanks had to wait for the infantry. There were no strategic independent armoured formations like there would be in later campaigns... from what I've heard. I've not studied the Polish Campaign of 1939

    • @Ceber911
      @Ceber911 7 років тому +2

      Blitzkrieg was a propaganda tool lmao. used by Joeseph Goebbels. Lmao The germans big thing was "mechanized infantry" their tatics of moving and being mobile.

    • @TheAiurica
      @TheAiurica 6 років тому +3

      No, it was not a blitzkrieg. In fact, the term blitzkrieg is a post-war term. German pre-war doctrine was basesd on war of manoeuvre (Bewegungskrieg), that emphasised mobility, combined arms operations and mission-type tactics (Auftragstaktik). This very mobile war (compared to static trench warfare of WW1) was later named "blitzkrieg". But in german army, the whole concept of war of manoeuvre (Bewegungskrieg) goes back to napoleonic wars.

    • @clonehd9962
      @clonehd9962 6 років тому

      TIK

  • @Kwodlibet
    @Kwodlibet 7 років тому +75

    Thank you for your video, I am half Polish and both my grandfathers fought against the Germans in WW2 - one as a Guerrilla fighter, the other one as part of the Polish forces in the Soviet army after the Barbarossa. Nevertheless, I am surprised that you did not mention the concept of Blitzkrieg itself. After all it was the very first time when it was actually used and it proved to be just as effective psychologically. The troops were not expecting such concentration and coordination of attack force and the German advance seemed even more unstoppable which was utterly demoralising. No mention of sabotage on the part of German population living in Poland either. Also, I must say that I am slightly disappointed that you forgot to mention the alliance of Poland with France and GB, who withdrew on their promise to attack Germany and just stood back and watched - policy they were very skilled at since 1933. All Poles knew that we could not defend successfully against the German attack, but the alliance gave us hope and strengthened the will to fight even when the situation was close to hopeless, yet the promised help did not come. Because of this even today there are some Poles who see France and GB as nothing more than cowards and liars and hold a bit of a grudge.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +8

      there was no concept of "Blitzkrieg". I guess I need to make a video on that at some point.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      and I am pretty sure I mentioned the lackluster performance of France and UK in that video... there is a baguette in there.

    • @Kwodlibet
      @Kwodlibet 7 років тому +14

      Yeah I noticed that and a cup of tea at 15:50. I really hope that I do not sound like I am trying to school you - I am perfectly aware that you must have forgotten more about the subject, than I have ever learned. However, it looks to me that you took it up as a Scholar, digging deep into numbers, but forgot or ignored the bigger picture and what it all represented and meant in the context. All your mention of that pact narrows down to just one sentence - "GB and France took a defensive stance at the beginning of the War" The thing is, I have actually spoken with the Polish people alive at the time (my family and their friends mostly) who were living in very different areas of the country - Southern Silesia, Present day Ukraine and in case of my grandmother also Pomerania. All were absolutely adamant and united that this alliance kept them going and there was an absolute elation when the West declared war on Germany. This explains perfectly why the initial German estimates of Polish fighting capabilities turned out to be false and there was no capitulation after 11 days of fighting. On top of that, when presenting the "isolated" situation of Poland at the time that is not what the Poles felt. All knew it was bad but also all knew that they have the largest empire in the world (GB) and incredibly well defended (due to Maginot Line) and strong ally backing them up and working tirelessly to rescue them as promised. They all "saw" in their imagination how Germany fights in Poland, pushing for Warsaw while at the same time is being gutted in the west, with our allies pushing for Berlin- As if to take first punches from a bully so your friends could have easier job finishing him off when he gets tired and shows them his back. We know now that it was not the case, now we know that it was in fact isolated, or rather left abandoned - now - it was not so, or at least was not suppose to be like that at the time. That is what the ordinary people and our leaders at the time thought and believed in. If that is not one of the major reasons why the campaign lasted a month instead of a week, then I do not know what is. Therefore I see it as much more crucial in the story of this campaign and deserving more than just one sentence... and a baguette. At 15:40 you say "Poland was politically isolated" which is blatantly not true. To say that it was isolated despite having political and military alliance with arguably 2 of the wealthiest and strongest countries in Europe at the time is like saying that today Israel is "is politically isolated" because it is surrounded by hostile neighbours.

    • @Kwodlibet
      @Kwodlibet 7 років тому +4

      I will wait for it then and will be most happy to learn all about it. As to my other comment about you forgetting the pact between France, GB and Poland I really do hope that you will not get upset over it. You did a brilliant job presenting this campaign and I am absolutely aware that there will always be someone out there who may poke at one thing or the other. I am just hoping to help you to improve your future work and provide constructive feedback. By forgetting the pact and the larger context the campaign you presented kind of "hangs in the air" detached from larger story of the conflict that will shape the world we live in. If someone not knowing that part of the history was to watch this video now, they would learn about troop movements and their strength, but will have no idea why WW2 actually started with that campaign (officially). They will have no idea what it meant for the people of Poland and how great a gamble was Hitler actually taking if France and GB actually kept their promise etc, etc. You see, to an extend they may get the numbers from one source or the other but the all important human context is not present here and they may never learn about it or realise it. After all our history is not so much a history of number of swords, guns, cannons being used, but it is just that - a history of humans. No, I do not mean you should talk about feelings and bring up heart wrenching stories and who cried where and over what - you are Germanic, being very precise is in your nature after all, talking about feelings probably not so much - just the "human context", not the details. Just try to add a bit more of that into your videos and you cannot miss to make them more interesting and relevant.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      I took me more to 20 hours for this video. My videos are all about leaving out stuff with a strong focus on Military History.
      To say it one word: SCOPE

  • @avive6539
    @avive6539 7 років тому

    Thank you for the good video, I am learning a lot about military using your videos.

  • @ScawerGaming
    @ScawerGaming 7 років тому +1

    Awesome video, Bernhard!

  • @FulmenTheFinn
    @FulmenTheFinn 7 років тому +4

    I find videos detailing campaigns like this especially interesting. Informative and well-made. Going to link this to a few others. :)

  • @mybutthasteeth1347
    @mybutthasteeth1347 7 років тому +74

    Gotta love that despite the Polish having virtually every possible disadvantage they kept fighting anyway. Respect for Polish courage!

  • @jboquiren1
    @jboquiren1 7 років тому +1

    Awesome vid! Thanks for the history lesson :)

  • @jonhwalsh4900
    @jonhwalsh4900 7 років тому

    Thanks again for all your hard work

  • @05KAR
    @05KAR 7 років тому +377

    Very educative and well prepared video, even if painful to watch for a Polish person. Still, I don't feel ashamed for holding back German arny for five weeks with soviets on a back and never giving up. No disrespect to the French soldiers but their cowardly leadership was shameful.

    • @bf2229
      @bf2229 7 років тому +34

      it's remarkable how bravely polish partisans faught the Germans even after polands occupation. just like Belorussian Ukrainian and Russian partisans fighting against German invasors after barbarosa.

    • @05KAR
      @05KAR 7 років тому +42

      sith ari
      The Polish partisans couldn't really fight Germans, it was issued that for every dead German they will capture exactly 100 random people and execuye on spot. Only in some cases, like in Zamość region people rebelled against the brutal occupation, the real fights started when soviets advanced, on a back of the front. Home Army liberated for example Vilnius together with red army and then they were arreseted, killed or sent to the camps. When the uprising in Warsaw started the soviets suddently stopped and even refused allied and Poish planes with aid to land and refuel behind the frontline.

    • @05KAR
      @05KAR 7 років тому +3

      sith ari
      So which members of UPA are now in the Ukrainian gov? There are none, not even the members of nationalist (if not neonazi) Svoboda party, which failed to get any serious support in electins and introduced barely 5 or 7 MPs. And yes, they were also killing Ukrainians which refused to cooperate or were cooperating with soviets.

    • @bf2229
      @bf2229 7 років тому +2

      +Oskar and yes I know that the upa killed even their own people. furthermore the second biggest nationality in the red army where Ukrainians. I have great respect for them and all the other nationalities who fought Nazism in ww2. they one big Soviet nation.

    • @05KAR
      @05KAR 7 років тому

      sith ari
      Poroshenko is the same oligarch as he was in gov of Azarov, he's just cynically playing emotions and nationalist sentiments, just like other politicians, including Putin. I also don't think that Russians can lecture anybody about treatment of opposition and freedom of speech, in case of Ukraine it's clearly because of invasion and infromation war of Russian gov. I'm not surprised that they wants to reduce the influence of anti Ukrainian propaganda aimed at deligitimisation of gov, statehood and even nationality. The same goes for communists of the other forces which agenda is aimed at some post soviet sentiments and "unification" with Moscow. That's all just dangerous to the state.
      There's no evidence, nor a reason, why some football hooligans and naonazi thugs needed to train abroad. This kind of people are in every single country and especially in Russia which is also cynically supporting right wing extremists in Europe.
      You're clearly repeating the Russian gov propaganda which is just aimed to excuse its political goals, including illegall military intervention and annexation of Ukrainian territory. The Russian puppet separatist rebels were told the same by the Moscow agents such as Girkin and Borodai or by these Russian gov media. As I've said, the popular support for Svoboda or Right Sector is minimal, Ukrainians are just people like other nations and they have to defend their identity and territorial integrity if they wants to survive as a sovereign nation.
      The Ukrainian gov doesn't need anything else but elections to legitimize itself, even Moscow recognise it oficially but of course not in its propaganda which is just directed to the people. The nationalistic rheotics and exploitation of these sentiments serves just creation of national identity in opposition to the post soviet and pro Russian. There's no need for creation of anti Russian sentiments, they're already there and clearly in reaction for Kremlin politics. You should not be surprised that people don't like to be invaded or insulted so don't expect love from Ukrainians.

  • @Invicta556
    @Invicta556 7 років тому +14

    I know it seems people love to hate on France in WW2 and call them "Cowards" but people seem to forget the Shock and Awe it caused when Army Group A broke through at Sedan. The French thought the Maginot line was unbreakable and there were defenses in the Ardennes but they where nothing compared to what was on the French-German Border. The French were Psychologically Defeated in 1940 as well as militarily. The Power of the Blitzkrieg really showed in France against the French, British, Dutch and Belgians. For those who think the French were "Cowards" should look up Bir Hakeim.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +11

      I don't call them cowards, I also have a video about Cpt. Billotte. Yet, when it comes to Poland the Allies failed several times during and after the war.

    • @Invicta556
      @Invicta556 7 років тому +3

      Yeah i just saw a few comment's calling them cowards. ill check that video out, would love to see you do a video on Case Yellow (Fall Gelb) and Case Red (Fall Rot). btw keep up the great work your videos are something very unique and really well researched.

    • @TomikoPL
      @TomikoPL 7 років тому +4

      Of course, we can't generalise and call all the French as cowards- that would be unfair. But I've read many stories from 1940 telling that whole regiments retreated in panic just because there appeared German patrol on two motorcycles.

    • @jotjotpoland2696
      @jotjotpoland2696 7 років тому +3

      "The French thought the Maginot line was unbreakable" and for the third time forgot that something like Belgium exists.

    • @MrRenegadeshinobi
      @MrRenegadeshinobi 6 років тому +1

      Peter Jolley people forget that France was one of the major military powers in Europe for a LONG time and ww2 happens and we won't let France forget it

  • @Stork2579
    @Stork2579 6 років тому +1

    Very objective video w/ wide range of details. I think thats all true and you guys included I guess every aspeckt of the campiagn there is. Thank you.

  • @brandonhendroff8294
    @brandonhendroff8294 7 років тому +1

    Really nice work Thankyou!

  • @WordBearer86
    @WordBearer86 7 років тому +5

    Do the 30 Years War next!
    Honestly though I'm a nut for that era lately. I'd even gladly gift ya this really awesome book I've come across about it over Audible.

  • @shinydewott
    @shinydewott 7 років тому +59

    Polish courage and love for their country seems unbreakable
    I love Poland and the Polish language
    love from Turkey

    • @erichvonmanstein1952
      @erichvonmanstein1952 5 років тому +2

      Shiny Dewott Unbreakable?
      Germany and USSR:Laughs...

    • @damian4926
      @damian4926 5 років тому +11

      @@erichvonmanstein1952 Yeah,
      - Germany *laughs*
      - Allies "hey Germany, you know what?"'
      - Germany "what?"
      - Allies "Two lost world wars"
      - Germany *cries*

    • @kubamalinowski4195
      @kubamalinowski4195 2 роки тому

      @@user-qs7ip6we5m nice name in cyrillic. cringe. go to gulag as your parents did

  • @cliffordsmith9628
    @cliffordsmith9628 7 років тому +1

    I really like your channel, please keep up the good work.

  • @antonleimbach648
    @antonleimbach648 7 років тому +5

    Great video, thank you.

  • @billmarmot2069
    @billmarmot2069 5 років тому +37

    On October 2, the Nazis assumed a position to take Kock. The Poles were particularly hard. The Nazis tried to grab Kock but Kock was firmly held. Action resumed October 3. There was stiff resistance but they were determined to take Kock. On October 4, the Nazis were blasted by Poles. October 5, the Nazis were quite wrecked maintaining their position in their bid to take Kock. After the Poles withdrew and were spent, they surrendered on October 6.

    • @froggleggers1805
      @froggleggers1805 4 роки тому

      Nazi's? So SS Troops attacked Kock?

    • @billmarmot2069
      @billmarmot2069 4 роки тому +5

      The dramatic reenactment I watched on pornhub had them in SS uniforms but that may have been slightly inaccurate. Of course squeaky clean wehrmacht weren't Nazis. Those swastikas on their uniforms were just for style and their loyalty oath to Hitler was just "lip service" if you catch my meaning.

    • @MicahBurginGTVPO
      @MicahBurginGTVPO 3 роки тому

      @@billmarmot2069 someone missed the joke

    • @JurassicClark96
      @JurassicClark96 2 роки тому +1

      @@froggleggers1805 They didn't just attack it, they gobbled up Kock

  • @ZedsDeadOK
    @ZedsDeadOK 6 років тому +5

    Thank you for this video, I would like to add some personal history to this account. My dearly departed father was Polish, born near to Lodz. He attempted to join the Polish airforce but discovered he was colour blind, so he was rejected, they feared he would shoot down his own aircraft. (Lol).
    He then joined the Army firstly as a machine gunner, but ended up as a chef cooking for his regiment, in the German invasion his unit was captured, apparently they were given the option of enlisting into the German Army, or going to a concentration camp, he decided to enlist one reason was that they were better fed rather than starve in a camp.
    , The second reason will become apparent.
    He rarely spoke of his war years, I guess he saw some horrible sights and was not particularly proud fighting for the Wehrmacht, luckily his unit was put on the western front so he and many other Poles escaped to the Allies lines. His brother's Polish unit was captured by the Russians he was never heard of again, it's believed many we're sent to work in the salt mines.
    After my father escaped he was reposted to Scotland from what I understand is that the Poles were going to be used to invade Norway but the end of the war came first. After the war the Poles were given the option to return to Poland, many didn't as they feared Russian rule, that's why there were many Poles living in the UK prior to joining the EU.
    I'm very proud of my father, he could not be described as being a war hero but his decisions were for survival when at a time so many perished, I'm thankfull for his decisions as I, my three daughters and eight grandchildren would not be here today.

  • @REALDEALMMA91
    @REALDEALMMA91 6 років тому

    i really enjoy these videos you post for us ... i am an avid WW2 Buff / Historian ... i love the information given in these clips ... its amazing work

  • @ericludendorff9347
    @ericludendorff9347 7 років тому +1

    I really love your diagrams its really helpful

  • @dukebielak
    @dukebielak 7 років тому +716

    Ah, Russians "protecting its population in the boarder regions" CLASSIC. #Crimea

    • @bf2229
      @bf2229 7 років тому +65

      the polish government acted very aggressive against the Soviet Union. while the Russian civil war Poland started a campaign against the USSR and did provokations after it. illegal border crossing, killing civilians and organizing a spy network on the territory of the Soviet Union. Furthermore the polish government refused to fight alongside with the Soviets and blocked a possibile military alliance even before the Soviet German non aggression pact. I don't see why the Soviet Union should not have invaded an enemy government which was openly against the USSR. After all the Soviet Union took back territory which was parts of the former Russian empire.

    • @tomaszmagierowski2166
      @tomaszmagierowski2166 7 років тому +94

      +sith ari Yeah and explain Lenin's plans for world conquest and the fact that there was a civil war going on and most of the world was on the white's side.

    • @dukebielak
      @dukebielak 7 років тому +145

      sith ari You mean just like Poland attacked that radio tower in Gleiwitz to kick start WW2? That is the funniest load of bullshit propaganda i've ever heard.

    • @tomaszmagierowski2166
      @tomaszmagierowski2166 7 років тому +65

      sith ari I'm suprised how well propaganda works.

    • @bf2229
      @bf2229 7 років тому +16

      +dukebielak nope that was a German Provokation. I'm talking about the polish intervention during the Russian civil war. u can google it.

  • @HighwayMule
    @HighwayMule 7 років тому +5

    A minor correction: Modlin to the north of Warszawa is not a city, just a small town, but it had an important fortress (Twierdza Modlin) that protected the capital from the north and had a significant defending garrison. Great vid overall.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +6

      thx, got lost in translation, reason is in German (or maybe just Austria) we don't really have different words for town and city, well maybe "Kleinstadt" vs "Stadt" vs "Großstadt", but well you see there is always a "Stadt" in it. Similarly, we don't have colleges in the way the US/UK has, everyone goes to university no matter if graduate or undergraduate.

  • @GeneralJakeMLB
    @GeneralJakeMLB 7 років тому

    this video is very helpful
    Thank you, I was having trouble

  • @wojtekimbier
    @wojtekimbier 7 років тому +1

    Thank you for the vid, pretty much what I'd learned in highschool but more concise and brief

  • @ImperialThirdWorldReich
    @ImperialThirdWorldReich 7 років тому +17

    Hey since Sabaton released their new song "Winged Hussars" would be great if ya can make a video about the battle of Vienna and (If I remember correctly) The Largest Cavalry Charge in history! Anyway, keep up the good work, I learn a lot from yer videos!
    -Anzei Kazumi

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +9

      I have been searching for a proper book on the 2nd siege of Vienna for months now. Also I want to do a video on the Winged Hussars itself, although there seems to basically one book out there.

    • @ImperialThirdWorldReich
      @ImperialThirdWorldReich 7 років тому +1

      Damn, I wonder why it's so hard to find stuff for such an awesome time in History. Still, love yer work, hope to see these videos soon, good luck on yer quest to look for em!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      I was confused when I couldn't find anything in library in Hamburg, but even in Austria the number of titles is quite limited... Also I am a bit picky.

    • @AcidProphet
      @AcidProphet 7 років тому

      plzplzplz Vienna 1683

    • @Teorge
      @Teorge 7 років тому +1

      How about a video about Hussite wars? I know that non-husitte countries was writing about them like they was devils ravaging Europe. But they small army was quite successful against crusades.

  • @DZSabre
    @DZSabre 7 років тому +3

    there were two motorized brigades in Poland. the 10th motorized Cavalry Brigade and the Warsaw Armoured-Motorized Brigade. The 10th operated primarily in the south.

  • @RonDuligi
    @RonDuligi 7 років тому +2

    I really loved this topic. So many WW2 documentaries and books don't go into much detail at all on this subject. They just mention the quick victory over Poland and continue.

  • @joshuadevonshire4561
    @joshuadevonshire4561 7 років тому +2

    These videos are very good! Very professional for a UA-cam channel

  • @tombry76wawa
    @tombry76wawa 7 років тому +15

    Poland had similar situation in 1939 like Germany i 1945. Poland was ataccked by many side from first day of war, long borders to protect, compare it with France in 1940, Maginot Line, short borders to protect.
    September Campaign
    Poland:
    39 divisions (some of them were never fully mobilized and concentrated),[4]
    16 brigades,[4]
    4,300 guns,[4]
    880 tanks,
    400 aircraft[1]
    Total: 950,000[Note 1]
    against
    Germany:
    60 divisions,
    6 brigades,
    9,000 guns,[1]
    2,750 tanks,
    2,315 aircraft[2]
    Slovakia:
    3 divisions
    Joined on 17 September:
    Soviet Union:
    33+ divisions,
    11+ brigades,
    4,959 guns,
    4,736 tanks,
    3,300 aircraft
    Total:
    1,500,000 Germans,[1]
    466,516 Soviets,[3]
    51,306 Slovaks
    Grand total: 2,000,000+
    But Poland fought to the end, had 700 000 soiders in the west and east front in 1945 and captured Berlin with Soviets ua-cam.com/video/Ih4t6kunlYI/v-deo.html

    • @lidiadushka
      @lidiadushka 7 років тому +2

      They fought on all fronts, from day 1 to the end of the war.
      The Polish flag: Hoisted aloft | The Economist www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2012/05/polish-flag

    • @sahipkran9447
      @sahipkran9447 4 роки тому

      Yeah you took berlin ahjajajajajajaj

    • @tombry76wawa
      @tombry76wawa 4 роки тому

      @@sahipkran9447 ua-cam.com/video/uI5S_VlvlJo/v-deo.html

    • @sahipkran9447
      @sahipkran9447 4 роки тому

      @@tombry76wawa I did not say that the Polish Army was not part of the Battle of Berlin, I meant that your support and power is insignificant. You were a shattered nation, the Allies rebuilt you and that´s it. You are like a child that has been helped by its parents to achieve a minor goal :)

    • @tombry76wawa
      @tombry76wawa 4 роки тому

      @@sahipkran9447 faster you are similar to primitive child. When Poland use tanks, planes your ancencors rode on cammels or horses only in british colony and was english slaves without any fight.

  • @Mastah2006
    @Mastah2006 7 років тому +7

    Very solid (german, so it was quite obvious) job, with one proviso...
    According to allied pact with UK and France Polish Army was obliged to defend the whole front line and not to deflect or withdraw from the fight. It wasn't a tactical mistake (source: "History of Poland" by Norman Davies, "September defence 1939" by prof. P. Wieczorkiewicz.

    • @annoyingbstard9407
      @annoyingbstard9407 5 років тому

      The was no "pact" with Britain. There was with France.

  • @PregnantWalrus225
    @PregnantWalrus225 7 років тому +2

    I love how France and the UK are represented with baguettes and tea

  • @timoverdijk3176
    @timoverdijk3176 6 років тому

    What an amazing video! The only thing that you forgot about air superiority is the added advantage of being able to keep track of troop movements from the air which came in handy for the German operational planners.

  • @gijnu
    @gijnu 7 років тому +8

    I wish I was mature enough to keep a straight face through "the battle of kock"

  • @Riceball01
    @Riceball01 7 років тому +9

    Great video, and I loved the length of this one, I tend to find most of your others just a tad too short. I am surprised that you didn't mention the myth of the Polish cavalry charging German tanks on horseback, it would have been great for you to mention it in order to help debunk that myth.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +1

      thx, is that Myth still around? For me it's like the Myth that Spitfires won the Battle of Britain, because basically everything from the last 20 years around states: no cavalry charge and more hurricanes when I read anything about those two topics.
      I think that there are for more interesting and more important myths out there, e.g., "wonder weapons" if only earlier and their "delays".

    • @kilijanek
      @kilijanek 7 років тому

      Have you heard about Polish Ur antitank rifle? Did you know that Germans discarded it because they didn't know how to utilize it? Original rounds for Ur were like modern HESH rounds in action principle, but Germans tried to utilize rounds with tungsten core as penetrator, which was less effective against armor. (That rifle was designed to inflict more damage against crew of tank than to tank itself- it is harder to replenish troops than weapons).

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому

      yeah, I even have an illustration of it in my Polish Division video, which I didn't link for some reason.

    • @Riceball01
      @Riceball01 7 років тому +2

      Military History Visualized
      You know, I don't know but I wouldn't be surprised if it still was. After all, the myths of Medieval European swords being dull, full plate armor being so heavy that you needed a crane to get on a horse still exist so I wouldn't be at all surprised if some history books still insist that the Polish cavalry charged German tanks with lances on horseback.

    • @MadMaddin91
      @MadMaddin91 7 років тому

      if i can add something to that, and unfortunatly i didn't find anymore the source of it :( that myth is some of this many half-truths, the polish cavalry didn't charge german tanks with lances on horseback, but they used their horses as a very mobile strike force, the battle was around one of the river areas and the german armored forces had more problems to cross them, than the polish cavalry. They did flank the german units descending from their horseback, strike them hard as possible and retreating as soon as they attacked, which caused some disarray in the german movements in that battle. I wish I could remember the name of that battle >.< and sry for my bad english

  • @SaintJavelin2022
    @SaintJavelin2022 7 років тому +1

    Great vid! If you could do this for Eastern front operations (especially obscure ones) that would be awesome!

  • @ScateboyIvo
    @ScateboyIvo 7 років тому +4

    Underrated video.

  • @QALibrary
    @QALibrary 7 років тому +5

    It was thanks to a small polish group giving there results and research (to the British diplomatic service) betley park was able to develop what the group stated and know about the German codes/decryption and communications

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +4

      yeah, as far as I know the Polish provided some considerable information for Engima-breaking etc. something that is widely unknown. Not sure if it is worth a whole episode, maybe something for a "little known but important facts" series.

    • @QALibrary
      @QALibrary 7 років тому +1

      that one of the first part of the Bletchley Park Tour they take you to and talk about the memorial dedicated to there work the Polish group did.

  • @ryap1
    @ryap1 7 років тому +3

    fuck yer new vid man your channel is growing fast =D nice!

  • @stannisvonhapsburg6883
    @stannisvonhapsburg6883 7 років тому

    You should do more videos like this one analyzing various campaigns

  • @petrosvantanas5412
    @petrosvantanas5412 7 років тому

    hey mate! love your videos! will you do invasions of other countries too? hope so! keep up the good work!

  • @abdulmasaiev9024
    @abdulmasaiev9024 6 років тому +19

    Giving no ground for the defense wasn't really so much an error as a political necessity. The Poles were following a plan agreed with with the western allies, and they wouldn't have agreed to it if it allowed the strategic ceding of ground - and, well, Poland's survival relied on having them back it up. Now if only those allies also followed that plan instead of just dicking around, things could have been quite different.
    Also, I lost it at the battle of cock. It just came, out of nowhere. Miiiiiiiiight want to check out a speech synthesiser or something to do a double-check as to how certain names are pronounced, at the very least in cases where things turn inadvertently hilarious.

  • @bruh5361
    @bruh5361 7 років тому +18

    that french/british sigil lol

  • @kennethcohagen9037
    @kennethcohagen9037 7 років тому +1

    I love the jack in the box icon used for surprise!

  • @Eldernesh
    @Eldernesh 7 років тому

    Another great video, can you do some video's about naval war in WW2 or modern naval organisation?

  • @kevinkim26
    @kevinkim26 6 років тому +3

    Just recently discovered your channel and I'm loving it so far. Just one question when it comes to this video in particular however; is there a reason you didn't mention the Battle of Westerplatte and the Bombing of Wieluń? These two engagements were literally the first battles (and I mention both as equally significant because although the Bombing of Wieluń commenced five minutes before the shelling of the Polish position at Westerplatte, the former was hardly a "battle/engagement" compared to the latter, but it did commence first) of the Invasion of Poland that kickstarted the Second World War as we know it, and I was surprised you didn't mention them at all.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  6 років тому +1

      yeah, I didn't mention Westerplatte because nearly everyone starts with it and I personally think it is only just useless trivia in the grand scheme of things. It's like people mentioning the exact birth date of someone, which is usually completely irrelevant.
      Same I usually say Barbarossa happened in Summer 1941 and not 22nd of June. This also relates to this video: ua-cam.com/video/ahNmXqi2wrQ/v-deo.html

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  6 років тому +2

      or in short: my videos are mostly about understanding and explanations, Westerplatte doesn't provide any of that.

    • @kevinkim26
      @kevinkim26 6 років тому +1

      Military History Visualized Wow, I didn't expect you to reply so quickly, especially on a video you uploaded nearly a year and a half ago; thank you!
      And thank you for the explanation, both those engagements not really being part of the "grand scheme of things", as you said, is what I assumed must be the reason of their exclusion in your video. You're right, as significant as these two engagements were, they were not part of the big picture of the main German troop movement and thrust into Polish territory.
      Keep up the great work, I'm enjoying every one of your videos so far since the past couple of days I've discovered your channel. I'm especially looking forward to a follow-up on your Operation Olympic video (an Operation Coronet video would be amazing, just crossing my fingers), and hopefully a Battle of France one as well in the near future!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  6 років тому +1

      well, Coronet probably not gonna happen, but the next video will be about Kamikaze and quite extensive. Should be out on Tuesday.

    • @kevinkim26
      @kevinkim26 6 років тому

      Military History Visualized That's a bummer that a Coronet video is not going to happen (I assume it's because since it's an operation that eventually never took place, it's all too hypothetical to truly analyze?), but I'm seriously excited for your upcoming Kamikaze video!

  • @kaisura8660
    @kaisura8660 7 років тому +22

    what anime is this

  • @chocolatefreespeach
    @chocolatefreespeach 7 років тому

    I'd be quite interesting to see you doing a video on operation bagration.

  • @Franz-141
    @Franz-141 7 років тому

    Do a video about gear that soldier carry,great video!

  • @gerryw173ify
    @gerryw173ify 7 років тому +5

    Have you ever thought about making a HOI4 or Company og Heroes 2 play through? I think you would have great commentary and can talk about historical accuracy in thr games.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +2

      once was thinking about commenting the national decision trees in HOI 4, because there historical commentary would probably make the most sense. For the historical accuracy stuff I need a lot of details I am not fully aware yet, but with every video I am getting closer.

    • @gerryw173ify
      @gerryw173ify 7 років тому

      +Sthursen Politics is an important part of history and also affected military. As long as he remains unbiased I think he's fine as long as he covers the sides/factors.

    • @gerryw173ify
      @gerryw173ify 7 років тому

      +Sthursen I'm not saying that he needs to delve into politics, just wanted to say that it was important.

  • @boblabrador8998
    @boblabrador8998 7 років тому +3

    You should cover the invasion of France,Belgium,Holland and the Balkans

  • @dieselsquiggles3557
    @dieselsquiggles3557 7 років тому +2

    Great content as always, MHV.
    A question, are you planning to do more Pacific-theater based videos? I can't think of any specific topic I'd like you to cover, but I'd be fine with anything as long as it's about the Pacific. I like the European theater, but I'm more interested in the Pacific as it's sorta 'closer' to me (I live in Southeast Asia).

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +2

      yeah, more Pacific will be out. Sadly, I don't think there is anything similar to the "Germany and the Second World War" (12 volumes) for the Pacific, which is an excellent foundation for all European theater stuff.

    • @jamesduston9292
      @jamesduston9292 7 років тому

      +Military History Visualized This 12 volume beauty where can I get it and what is it called?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому

      James: "Germany and the Second World War" is the English title, in the description there should be a link to my amazon store, where I added most or nearly all English volumes. The German title is "Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg", I think not all volumes have been translated to English so far.

  • @ukaszflorkowski2435
    @ukaszflorkowski2435 7 років тому +1

    Great video! Nice analysis of first months of WWII. But remember: Battle of Bzura, not Buzra ;) Yeah, i know, its a hard word, but there are worse (for example Skrwa, Wkra, Brda, Drwęca - these are all rivers)

  • @BaldPolishBiotechnol
    @BaldPolishBiotechnol 7 років тому +4

    Well done. You presented a brief but competent video on the war in 1939. The Polish Army counted on resisting long enough for the Western Allies to join the war and crush Wehrmaht. That led to initial fierce resistance, then withdraw to the line of Wistula-Narew, considered easy to defend for a while. That was undone by comrade Stalin, despite non aggression pact. One grain of salt, where it is due, however. Your pronunciation of Polish place names grated on my ears enormously. For future videos you may try Google Translate. There is a function that allows to play the word being looked up.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +3

      thx, I know, the video took way longer than suspected, more than 20 hours before I started recording (another 1 hour recording + 2 hours editing), thus I hadn't time to revisit all names, I only checked for "Lwow". If you look at my facebook page you will see a "premature apology" from yesterday.

  • @professionaltourist322
    @professionaltourist322 5 років тому +5

    Yeah,we were completely out maneuvered in this war. There were hardly any battles and if you read memoirs of Polish soldiers they write mainly about marching and being contantly attacked by Luftwaffe.
    You did good job with this video.

    • @heezay3678
      @heezay3678 2 роки тому

      Hardly any battles? WTF? There were many of them lol

  • @moseszero3281
    @moseszero3281 7 років тому +2

    I really like your videos and I know this is an older one -- The map is a bit difficult to follow especially since you mention towns that are not on the map. I would suggest that you at least put a dot on any town you plan to mention and draw a frontline for advancing troops since a map full of arrows gets really cluttered.

  • @basicallyalive8615
    @basicallyalive8615 7 років тому

    Now that you have done a large scale, could you do something about single soldiers in WW2? Such as individual equipment, training, and even rations. I think it would be interesting seeing how different countries treat and make their line infantry.

  • @markhenley3097
    @markhenley3097 7 років тому +3

    Apart from a few incorrect Polish pronunciations, very well made!

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому

      thank you! "few" is very polite ;)

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 7 років тому

      +Military History Visualized Looking at the rest of your channel. Keep up the amazing work.

  • @xxl93pl
    @xxl93pl 7 років тому +3

    Number of tanks and aircraft's would be better comparison than the only number of troops
    Tanks: 600 to 2800
    Aircrafts: 400 to 2000 -> PZL P.11c vs Messerschmitt Me 109 Bf there was giant technology step between those two.
    Artillery: 4500 to 11000

  • @VladderGraf
    @VladderGraf 7 років тому +2

    Good video. I would only add that in the 1920s and especially 1930s Poland and the Polish Armed Forces were preparing for another war against the Soviet Union. This had significant impact on the way Polish troops were organized, equipped and trained.

  • @ceamhd
    @ceamhd 6 років тому

    Es wäre großartig, wenn du ein solches Video auch für den "Fall Gelb" (Frankreichfeldzug) machen könntest.

  • @Snatch737
    @Snatch737 7 років тому +6

    how can I add Polish subtitles? :)

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +6

      there should be a guide out there, I definitely allow subtitles and people added various to other videos, you also get listed automatically in the video description.

    • @Snatch737
      @Snatch737 7 років тому +5

      +Military History Visualized
      spasibo, i'll look for that

  • @bcjhen64
    @bcjhen64 7 років тому +41

    Germans should have taken Modlin bus. It would have been faster...

    • @danielsuchorowiec7314
      @danielsuchorowiec7314 7 років тому +8

      Hahhahahahaha

    • @pieterfischer9638
      @pieterfischer9638 6 років тому +1

      Unfortunately, the bus was booked to capacity with a sports team, and tickets were too pricey. So , yea.

  • @MrPhat0817
    @MrPhat0817 7 років тому +1

    Thank for making this channel. I never knew Soviet Union also invaded Poland in 1939

  • @ProjektErinnerung
    @ProjektErinnerung 7 років тому +2

    Really really good. like allways. very objectiv, good sources and some information I didn´t know. keep up with this nice work!!! It´s every time very interesting how long the Polish Military hold Poland against the German Forces and Red Army. It´s sad what happend in Poland after Fall Weiss (Katyen, Einsatzgruppen and so many more) the national movement during the 1840/47 the Poles and germans were so close and it ended up with things like that.
    But anyway Danke für diese Video´s es ist echt super was Sie machen! Besitzen Sie eigentlich ein Lehrstuhl oder ähnliches, in Potsdam gibt es ja Beispielsweise Militärhistorie als Studienplatz, weiß nicht wie es da in Österreich aussieht :)

  • @M41610
    @M41610 7 років тому +10

    no army may enter tata land, that is protected by POLISH HAND

  • @T.S.Birkby
    @T.S.Birkby 7 років тому +10

    If only the Poles had some Bren guns

    • @shellshockedgerman3947
      @shellshockedgerman3947 7 років тому +4

      They would have done better if they had Spendaus.

    • @Koksu111
      @Koksu111 7 років тому +3

      We had own-produced RKM Wz.1928 (heavilly modified version of B.A.R), they were good enough

    • @T.S.Birkby
      @T.S.Birkby 7 років тому +4

      +Commander will LindyBeige do a video saying the American's won the war because of BARs

    • @leongrelck7810
      @leongrelck7810 7 років тому

      katana shooting bren gun?

    • @danielsuchorowiec7314
      @danielsuchorowiec7314 7 років тому

      Well said.. Well said..

  • @Sundara229
    @Sundara229 7 років тому +1

    This is so interesting to watch. Even more since i am half polish/half german(if you can say so). My grandfather still lived when i was a young boy, and even back then i liked listening to his stories about the war and fighting on the east-front against the russians.

  • @PattyOflan88
    @PattyOflan88 6 років тому

    Been seeing ads again recently bud. Good to see

  • @rainthegenericname_7131
    @rainthegenericname_7131 7 років тому +490

    Watching this video is an embarrassment to the French. The Poles fought better! MAN UP YA BAGUETTES!

    • @dejabu24
      @dejabu24 7 років тому +21

      the french weren't the only ones fighting in 1940 the brits were also were there

    • @danielsuchorowiec7314
      @danielsuchorowiec7314 7 років тому +48

      +jeffrey dahmere and they were urged to do brexit in 1940.

    • @theoderic_l
      @theoderic_l 7 років тому +25

      The French inflicted far heavier casualties on the Germans than the Poles did.

    • @divinemoments5344
      @divinemoments5344 7 років тому +33

      @刘鸿韬 Directly opposite.

    • @ls200076
      @ls200076 7 років тому +2

      +刘鸿韬 what?

  • @germanalonso2496
    @germanalonso2496 7 років тому +4

    Battle of kock. o god I feel the jokes coming(sorry if this offends anyone)

    • @arekborowski8881
      @arekborowski8881 7 років тому +1

      yep, if morons like this one in video cant prenounce names correctly

  • @KrolPotato
    @KrolPotato 3 роки тому +1

    It's cute how you use baguette and tea in your graphics for France and Britain. I guess it's better than mustache and umbrella....

  • @TheCrazyCrewNL
    @TheCrazyCrewNL 7 років тому +1

    Nice!

  • @sanchezmefi1005
    @sanchezmefi1005 7 років тому +3

    You forgot to mention Slovakia. They attacked Poland from the south.

  • @georgec7155
    @georgec7155 7 років тому +14

    As soon as war broke out, the British sent a shipment of bren guns to their Polish allies, but it was stopped by the German navy in the baltic. Had it arrived the outcome would have been very different.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  7 років тому +6

      :D

    • @Grondorn
      @Grondorn 7 років тому +15

      Lol, it wouldn't.

    • @maciejniedzielski7496
      @maciejniedzielski7496 7 років тому +3

      If Great Britain didn't sign treaty of Munich in 1938 outcome would be différent cause Germany wasn't able to win against Tscheqoslovakia and Poland at the same time. Tscheques had in 1938 thé Army more motorized than Wehrmacht.

    • @Sverge
      @Sverge 7 років тому +2

      That sounds like something Lindybeige could have said! :D

    • @blupolo2389
      @blupolo2389 7 років тому +1

      You do realized the Poles and Cechoslovakians weren't exacly friends right ? So common defense wouldn't be possible.

  • @madrigraal
    @madrigraal 6 років тому

    Excellent visuals

  • @juangallego7197
    @juangallego7197 6 років тому +1

    One has to keep in mind when comparing numbers is that the Soviet battle order is always different. Soviet infantry divisions would go from 6000 to 8000 men, and their "armies" would go from 20-30000 to 50-60000 men at most, which would be more like an army corps of a Western Army instead of being designated an Army itself.
    So while saying 26 Polish divisions vs 35 Soviet Divisions sounds like it's the Polish at numerical disadvantage, it would be quite the opposite.

  • @AdamAdam-vy3od
    @AdamAdam-vy3od 7 років тому +59

    long live Poland

    • @xyzxxxc5365
      @xyzxxxc5365 7 років тому +9

      WAS? We still are here you moron. 1 000 years of History and its not END !

    • @phoenix84pl
      @phoenix84pl 7 років тому +5

      Actually Poland is much older than 1000 years. 1000 years has catholic slavonic country under name of Poland. Before names used: Lechia, Slavia, Sarmatia, Scythia, Hiperborea. Name of Lechia/Lechi/Lehi is used in Bible (old testament).
      www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+15&version=NIV

    • @xyzxxxc5365
      @xyzxxxc5365 7 років тому +4

      Yeah, yeah, but those slavs WAS NOT polish. Poland as country have 1 000 years (more les).

    • @phoenix84pl
      @phoenix84pl 7 років тому +5

      of course it was Poland. If you change the country name in does not change the country. Vide: Persia → Iran. The same you can say regarding Partition of Rzeczpospolita. In 1795 Rzeczpospolita was parted, but in 1918 Poland appeared. King Bolesław Chrobry was a king of Slavs, Goths aka Poles (Regnum Sclavorum, Gothorum sive Polonorum). Name od Poland has started to be used after Gniezno Meeting (AD 1000). Earlier name was Slavia vel Lechia.

    • @xyzxxxc5365
      @xyzxxxc5365 7 років тому +2

      You are not right Polanie (polish people ) develop much later. Beside in time of tribes Sarmatia, Scythia, Hiperborea ther was no slav in europ. We come to europ MUCH later. And after some time from slavic tribes arisen Polish Rusians Czechs and so on. Sorry but Polish nation and country exist from 1 000 years more les. Bóg Honor Ojczyzna !

  • @leonardthesnifferwallace5073
    @leonardthesnifferwallace5073 7 років тому +3

    Bet the Poles back then felt betrayed by the British and French after having been used a bargaining chip and "leverage" on Hitler. Both assured Poland they had to drive a firm line and not cave in to German demands, and also assured they would defend Poland in case of a war.
    After Poland so valiantly helped lift the Ottoman siege on Vienna in 1683, the Austrians were one of the tree powers that partitioned up Poland in 1772. So much for trusting the Austrians.
    So are Poles today any smarter? No, unfortunately they somehow think that the USA will be any better and won't at all use Poland as the same kind of bargaining chip and leverage on Russia. When Trump's in charge no less. Unbelievable.
    If the Poles are as brave and resourceful as they say how about going your *own* path? Stop selling yourselves out to the highest bidder to fight enemies that aren't yours to begin with.

    • @steveguild871
      @steveguild871 5 років тому

      You sound like a Russian troll. Trust Russia and Putin. Yeah, that has worked out so well for Georgia and Ukraine.

  • @delidumrul31
    @delidumrul31 7 років тому

    Can you make videos about all major German plans like this? (Fall Blau, Fall Grün etc.)

  • @dimakapeev3156
    @dimakapeev3156 7 років тому +2

    Difference between La and Yak/ Bf-109 and Fw 190 or Soviet Air Army organization episode?