Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Quest Pro vs. Pico 4 - Image Quality, Lens, FOV and Comfort Comparisons
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
- These new headsets came on the market featuring new optical stacks featuring pancake lenses. I take a look at how they compare.
The tilted position is quite a funny thing. I naturally start to wear it like that with the light blocker. And yes, the fov is really something else, and the immersion is great. I added a head strap on the top to lock it naturally in this position and having less weight on the nose too. The fact that the headset is "breathing " when you move is also really enjoyable and prevents sweating. I'll probably buy a replacement from cushion to make it more comfortable, though. The design of the pro is really different from most headsets, but once you get used to it, it's really an awesome tool.
I love the thinking out of the box tweaks you have doe to find the sweet spots of performance.
When you mentioned the pupil swim, I stopped the video and got out my pico 4 to check. It absolutely does not have that issue. You might have gotten hold of a bad headset, their quality control is not always the best, or else it’s been fixed in software since you made the video.
Same here no pupil swim on my Pico 4 either
The best review with comparation out there
Exactly what I was looking for. Greate video
I just received my pico 4 yesterday and it felt amazing but unfortunately I don't have a PC so I don't have access to PCVR games which is a bummer because if I did it would be hands down better than the quest 2. At the moment The quest 2 it's just a more fluid working device when it comes to layout and the fact that the library of games are stellar. I will be building a PC here soon with my brother so I'm looking forward to that experience
Don’t just get it for pcvr that’s just weird
@@maximilianmus-4274 as of right now that's really the only way to actually maximize the potential because of the limited library that they have as of right now. They have the game contractors but it's region locked so there's no mods so it's hard to find games. If I had a PC I could just use the steam version and have better graphics and be able to find a game
@@sidney1234usc side quest just added support for pico now u can get a lot more games
@@maximilianmus-4274 I got it mostly for playing pcvr. Nothing wrong with that at all lol
@@GroteGlon
PCVR is way better anyway 🤷🏻♂️
Nice comparison video, thanks
wow amazing in depth video thanks
Hey does everyone else with the Meta pro see like a light around the lens? At first I thought it was the light bleeding in without the blockers but I have the new block out cover and at times I notice this light, it's almost like if the lens fog up but its not fogging. Is this backlight bleeding?
After my pro broke and i got a refund i bought a pico 4 and a 4090 instead n i think i actually prefer the pico 4. The pro was great it had better color n better sweet spot at about 90% but the pico is sharper n the binocular overlap is so much better that if i had to buy agen id defo go with the 4090 and the pico 4. Atleast when we get the real next gen headsets my pc will be ready for it n the sweet spot on the pico is still about 80% n i feel the fov is slightly better on the pico n i find that means quite alot to me in vr
I have a Quest Pro and 4090 and the experience is incredible for PCVR. Not tried the Pico 4 but if I had to choose between a Quest Pro with a lesser GPU versus a Pico with the 4090 I'd definitely pick the Pico with 4090. When there are £400 headsets that can get you most of the way towards a £1500 headset's visual experience in game it makes sense to save a grand and put it towards a top GPU.
Plus new headsets come around every year. I love my Quest Pro but it feels like it arrived both too early and too late. Too early, in that its new hardware features like MR, face and eye tracking are almost completely unsupported, and too late in that its still using the very old at this stage XR2 gen 1 chip.
I'd imagine Meta will release a Quest Pro 2 in 2024 and it will be a significant step up over the Pro with more processing and graphics power, better passthrough, higher resolution displays, and actual applications for MR and working foveated rendering eye tracking.
Also, according to a report in China in 2024 most major headset companies, including Meta are switching to 3800 x 3500 uOLED displays. Not worth spending loads this year on a HMD unless you have money to burn and can't wait.
I own a Quest Pro and have some Through the Lens videos on my channel using PCVR with a 4090. The Clarity is insane.
This is my thoughts and findings.
Price - It does cost a bit, but when you put it in perspective, it's priced about right;
G2 Omnicept £1250,
Varjo Aero ~£3000 (Including base stations, controllers, headphones, Import tax)
HTC Focus 3 £1300
HTC Vive Pro 2 Kit £1300
Valve Index Kit £919
Most of the above are not standalone, and some don't have eye tracking and all the other sensors like the Quest Pro has.
Resolution - This is where there is a lot of misconception!
Quest 2 use a single panel, Quest Pro uses two panels that move with the lens stack, so you get MORE visible pixels, which increases the Pixels per degree, giving you better image quailty, and superb clarity, so overall you get a higher visible resolution.
Lenses - This is truly next gen VR, edge to edge clarity, no god rays. being able to look any direction with your eyes and have clear clarity is something Fresnel lenses can't do.
These are the best Lenese on any HMD right now.
SDE - If you look for it, you can see it, more so on white back grounds. but this is nothing like the Rift S, Valve Index. Fresnel lenses did a good job hiding it with the Quest 2, but with the clarity of the Pancake lenses, it has made it more pronounced. That said, playing PCVR games, you won't notice it.
PCVR - I've owned many headsets over the years from the CV1, Samsung, Revrb G1, G2 v1, Quest 2, Pico 4.
I have to say, out of all those HMD's, the Quest Pro is a massive step up in clarity. Even people with HTC Vive Pro 2 and Focus 3 and Varjo Aero have came forward in a forum I use, and have stated how resolution is not everything, and how they are blown away with the clarity of the Quest pro. It is truly awesome, especally when we crank the settings up.
Turning the render resolution up to 1.7x, using Oculus Debug Tool, and setting encode width to 3616, and bit rate to 500Mbps, really makes the Quest Pro shine by hiding compression, and giving objects in the distance a sharper clarity, making it easier to read marker boards in the likes of sim racing etc.
Now as I own a 4090, these setting are playable at 90FPS and high settings in the likes of DCS. ACC Epic VR, which just look incredible!
MSFS Ultra settings plus 1.7x render resolution plays at a solid 45FPS with ASW, and is also incredible how that looks and feels.
Controllers - Well lets just make it clear, as good as the CV1 Touch controllers, and Valve Index controllers at tracking, with a premium feel and great haptics.
Comfort - Is hit and miss depending on your head shape. It is well balanced, and fits my head nicely.
FOV - I have a IPD of 67mm using the FOV app, I see 104 degrees, push my eyes closer, and I get 106.
Conclusion - After many hours with this HMD, I am keeping it as my go to PCVR HMD, it truly is a next gen experience.
So these settings only work when using the link cable correct? Now do we have to match the Encode Res Width to what we set the render Res in the Oculus Graphic pref? I didn't see the 3616 when I maxed it out to 1.7, it only gives me 2736
They work for both Airlink and cable as the info still needs to be encoded and decoded. Though if you leave 500Mbps bit rate and then go to Airlink, you may find yourself having connection issues, so always revert this setting back to 0.
Manually set 3616 as that is the native for both panels width combined.
I was gonna trade my Aero for a Quest Pro but I'm not because the clarity and resolution is superior. I don't know about comfort but the Aero is hard to beat there
@@D-money813 So you gave this anaylst based on the spec sheet?... Would it not be more constructive to own both and then compare side by side before making this comment?
@@tgpips1128 nah, i had quest pro owners tell me
I have the valve index. I understand that the FOV is very similar to pico 4, but at the SDE level, how are we doing? Because the only defect that the valve index has is the SDE, too visible
I agree the Valve Index is close to perfect other than the SDE and resolution; SDE and pixels are much much less noticeable than index with pico 4 and quest pro.
That fact that a $400 headset is in anyway comparable to a headset four times it's price, speaks volumes about both devices.
There are features and I mean a ton...that are not on pico
@@jaysoegaard I have no doubt there are. Got $1500?
@@FatNorthernBigot Yes, but I need some content that is optimized for pro...I don't buy new tech unless there is a bunch of software that compliments it...Apple and Samsung do this all the time.. What the point of paying a premium for tech for 3 or 5 apps that support it with the next apps inline being 4 to 6 months away....Stupid actually
@@jaysoegaard I get that, honestly, and the software of the Pico 4 is only just catching up, but you caught me off the back of a three hour PCVR session, and I promise, the Pico is peerless for PCVR. 👍
@@FatNorthernBigot thanks bud
Nice comparison video, thx
Hi, great video! How are you mounting the tundra tracker to your Quest Pro? Does it help with drift running mixed reality?
Exactly right... Stay tuned I'll do a video showcasing this
What does the pico 4 look like in dim room lighting?
I have the Pico 4, having some issues with head tracking. Any advice?
I would love to see a measured fov for the tricks you used.
yes... looking at how smaller the distance is from the eye and if the 106 that is being thrown around is from the normal position... then the position he put it in could possibly give him easily a higher FOV than even valve index. At least in theory.
for me a dealbreaker with Pico 4 is a weird glare/reflection going on, it is hard to explain but if there is a black background and a bright image (like a sun), the reflection of this image will be present and it is very noticeable. Much worse than quest 2:(
I am wondering how this is in quest pro? anybody?
The quest pro produces a really clear and sharp image. You can see some small reflection from time to time, but only if you're not using the light blocker and if you have a strong light source near you. Other than that, I must admit the image is tremendously clear. It's honestly better that the index of but also better than the reverb g2. I haven't tested some pimax headset yet thought.
I wonder if the Pico 4 swim is really WMR or OpenXR. I get a lot of warping when moving my head in Openxr thru WMR. I get none with Virtual Desktop.
Great video, not used a Pico but I have a Quest Pro and your experience pretty much exactly mirrors mine, especially the large FOV and superb USB-C link connectivity. It's even replaced my Reverb G2 in Microsoft Flight Simulator now.
Ya, same here. My Quest Pro is also working very well with Air Link at 200mbps Fixed bitrate. Much better than with Virtual Desktop (max 150mbps), with much better colours imho.
Yeah same here. It's awesome in racing sims
large fov? you have no idea
@@ZZYDDD it's a bit wider than the Valve Index on the horizontal and only exceeded by the Pimax headsets which suffer from a lack of depth perception and incorrect stereopsis as a result.
I had a Vive Pro 2 and the FOV on the Quest Pro is much better, as wide on the horizontal, but larger on the vertical and with edge to edge clarity across the entire lens.
But maybe you know of a headset that manages to exceed the FOV of the Quest Pro without canting the lenses to the point that the depth perception and stereopsis is broken, whilst simultaneously maintaining focus and clarity across the entire visual field?
@@ZZYDDD Ya, well Pimax 8kx large FOV didn't rock my boat and I returned mine to Amazon earlier this year. Maybe the term Large Enough FOV is a better thing to call the QP's FOV, lol!
I made the face interface on the Pico 4 softer, the lenses became closer to the eyes and all the problems with the lenses and with the distortion of the image were gone, and the viewing angle in the helmet was also much increased.
Any idea roughly how many degrees or percentage we're talking about in terms of increase of FOV?
Getting the IPD correct also helps.
@@peterthree now I removed face mask and use Pico 4 like glasses, just glued two soft pieces of foam to rest on the nose, now FOV about 115° - 120°, and nothing mask pressure to the face.
@@artefaktartefakt but did you measure it with a program? It doesn't seem that you did seeing as you state 115-120 instead of a concrete number.
What do you think if you use wifi 6 ( or 6E ) with this quest pro this pictures enough there is no articact on the screen? ( AV1 codec is much better than the old one ) So the Quest 3 would be sharper and it means there won'T be so much picture quality differenc with Crystal or Varjo which use display port or the wireless VR won't be the same picture quality than the dedicated display ports PC VR ? it is impossible? Thanks this answer in advancce,
Hey nice video! I have a little question, why you have a thundra tracker in the back of the meta pro quest?
He says in the video why he has it.
ua-cam.com/video/YtFu5N5UP6U/v-deo.html
Good morning.
I have noticed the same "warping" distortion in Pico 4 hardware. My complains to Pico Support resulted in answer: "Fish eye problems on a screen or lens are caused by pancake lens technology and are a normal phenomenon with all optical devices."
Could You confirm that this effect is visible in Quest Pro which has pancake lenses too?
Thank You for Your work.
Thats Picos excuse for the inferior lens quality. Mine is also warping a little bit.
G2 picture is better because of the Display port or you prefer the Quest pro instead?
Hi! I have a question. I want to choose vr headset with the best visuals (crisp image) to use by wifi 6 connection with my PC. Money is no object. So what is better Pico 4 or Quest Pro? Thanks for any help in advance!
What did you get brother?
What powerbank do you have for your quest pro... that is a powerbank strapped to the back right
At least a real comparison ignoring the price factor. Nobody did that. Great video.
If you still have a P4, the belatedly recent updates make the P4 very stable and no more dull colors. I think the color updates are the most recent.
Thanks for idea about using Pico4 without face interface, it's cool, for more comfortable using Pico4 without ase interface i use two soft self-adhesive pads to support the nose and i fixed face part of headset with strap it not rotation now, and this is great.
Check out my other video for custom gaskets as well!
is wirelesss streaming really that bad? would you say better off to get a wired headset ?
Wireless Streaming is better than its ever been, (the pico implementation is weak though so far). With Quest Pro, wireless streaming is the best its ever been and is quite usable... I'd still prefer a wired solution that can do high res and 144Hz+ which will eventually come out.
I absolutely need to know what is the box on the back of your Quest Pro!
LOL that was explained at the end of the video. It's a Tundra Tracker which can be used to track/sync lighthouse devices like the Index controllers without using actual lighthouses.
@@dtrjones thank you! I couldn’t understand the spelling on the video!
How's the FOV on the QPro/pico 4 compared to the index?
If you used the Index with the eye relief pushing the lenses right up to your eye... they are pretty comparable, but the pico and qpro seem a bit wider on the horizontal FOV, (you start to see the edges of the screen on the Valve Index) but just the slightest bit less vertical FOV.. (The valve index Vertical FOV is perfect for my face) the lenses on Qpro and pico are much more clear though and no god rays; although if you use the pico without the gasket you do get mirror like reflections.
@@cbutters I got the index and vive pro (with GearVR lens mod) and just today ordered a pico 4.
I got a VR problem haha, but I did read that a few guys replaced their Index with the pico, so I am curious to see if the PCVR streaming can replace dedicated PCVR headsets.
I am glad to know that the FOV is compatible tho! Thank you for your detailed response!
I personally could be interested in a PCVR headset comparison (such as the index vs QPro/Pico).
I appreciate your reviewing style and level of detail.
Have you notice mura on pico 4? Some people are having problem with that so im afraid to buy it since no refund for international buyer
I haven't noticed that issue on mine, although I've never been particularly sensitive to that particular issue, especially since I generally use compressed stream from PC so the picture is muddy enough anyways from the compression that I don't notice that particular issue if it is there. I'll look for that going forward and post an update..
@@cbutters how good is compressed visual? Can you notice thats been compressed or not really? Thanks
Quest pro, A great helmet for your new money, love from the first three days, with each charging of the helmet there is enough time for more work (the battery should be pumped), to get a greater viewing angle - the forehead support should be pushed as deep as possible, helping with your fingers when you turn the stop adjustment wheel. In order not to put pressure on the forehead, it is necessary not to tighten the helmet very much on the head, and after tightening the helmet to the size of the head, lift the front part of the helmet and slightly pulling forward and, as it were, put the helmet on the forehead, at this moment the frontal emphasis will bend more to the shape of the forehead and then it will be comfortable to spend long sessions in the helmet))
Is that an extra battery pack on the back of your Pro?
it is a tundra tracker for syncing it up with lighthouse controllers (valve index controllers)
Thanks for the video! You recommend to put the Quest Pro directly down on the nose to get a better FOV. But won't this lead to problems with the eye tracking or the foveated rendering? Because your eyes are not aligned vertically anymore? (In a different video I saw that the Pro asks for a vertical alignment.)
Yes this is true and I mentioned that exact thing in the video.
@@cbutters Ok, sorry, I didn´t hear you talking about this problem in the video. But that means that it´s necessary to wear the Pro like it´s meant to and not down on the nose.
@@yurn1 only if you want to use face tracking while you play
@@yurn1 no it does not mean that... only if you use the eye face tracking.
Ok, but why the Tundra tracker?
It lets you use it with Valve Index controllers by mapping the steamvr playspace to the quest playspace. see: github.com/bdunderscore/OpenVR-SpaceCalibrator/releases/tag/v1.4-bd_-r2
thanks
For me the jaggies combined with the foveated rendering are kinda bad in the Pico 4 compared to the Quest 2. I think it's a matter of developers being lazy and not optimizing the games for the Pico. It would really cool if we could have Quest Games Optimizer for Pico 4, it really helps sharpen up some Quest games with minimal effort.
Also I was playing some Walking Dead Saints and Sinners PC version on the Pico and at night or inside dark houses you can see a reflection of your health/stamina bar above it, very annoying bug. In the Pico version of the game it's like they knew that would happen so the darker scenes are more washed out and you can't see the reflection.
I've only had the Pico a few days overall I'm pretty happy with it just wish it had some standalone exclusives and the games were more optimized for the system. Love how light the system is but I'm already making some comfort mods and audio mods making the thing into a FrankenPico.
Swim and sway on pico 4 is ONLY on the pass through. I have not experienced this in-game. Moving the camera around the lens is not analogous to eye movement.
I've heard some people mention there is quite a bit of variation in the lenses, it is possible some picos do not have this issue, but with my unit; it's definitely an observable effect vs. the Quest Pro. I realize a camera lens is not analogous to eye movement, If you have a better idea how to at least try to represent the lens in a video besides using a camera to record it and explaining verbally what I experienced; I'd like to hear it.
I have no problems with my Pico 4 either. My experience with the Pico 4 is totally different than the reviewer.
Swim and sway on passthrough largely fixed on new update 5.2.2
@@VR-Trailers Thanks for the update! I'll have to try the new software verseion out as passthrough detail is much better on the pico than Pro... but I'm not refering to the swim and sway of the passthrough camera stability, I'm talking about pupil swim which is a geometric distortion of the lens; see here: vimeo.com/468090954
turn on eye protection on Pico 4 and it will increase saturation and make everything warmer.
Did you test Air Link ? I mean wireless, but not wired.
After reading some of the early comments on this video, I tried air link instead of Virtual Desktop.... and I gotta say, its really impressive, a lot of the stutters and other issues I've had wirelessly are not nearly as big of a problem using air link as I experienced using Virtual Desktop. HL Alyx is smooth as butter and even Beat Saber is playable with almost no hiccups. I think I might tear down my cabling system!
@@cbutters Exactly. I have always found Air Link significantly smoother than Virtual Desktop. So, I have no idea why many people said Virtual Desktop is better.
It's strange because I've tried air link in the past on quest 2 and it was the one that stuttered extremely and VD worked fine. I also really appreciate the ability to pop in and out of the desktop mode vs. VR mode super quickly in virtual desktop... but for quest pro... yeah airlink for me is working close to flawlessly right now the last few hours.
@@cbutters Would you test Air Link in Quest 2 and see if it works well nowadays ?
@@stylewan Air Link is nearly perfect in every aspect. Especially if you tune it correctly via Oculus Debug Tool. Way better than VD
Yeah I've tried both too. Even with all the required tweaking and modding the Quest Pro is just too low resolution compared to the Pico 4. Playing Half Life Alyx is so much sharper and real than with the pro. Too bad, those lenses are gorgeous and lack virtually any distortion. We'll see what the Quest 3 brings?
Testing back to back I found Air Link and Wired Link to be just about indistinguishable from one another and I agree link works better than Virtual Desktop. Testing the Pro with VD and the Pico 4 netted the same performance results with some stutters and just not as smooth...switch the Pro over to link and it's just buttery smooth. As good as VD is the Airlink/cable link solution just works better at this point.
It's hard to compare a competitor to the Quest 2 (Pico4) and a Pro version of the Quest. Yes, the Pro may be better but take into account the pricing and the target market - then the Pico is outstanding compared to the competition. I love my Pico 4, especially for PC VR, the Pro just did not impress me enought to spend the extra cash.
basically it's 400 euro vs 1600 euro
It does cost a bit, but when you put it in perspective, it's priced about right;
G2 Omnicept £1250,
Varjo Aero ~£3000 (Including base stations, controllers, import tax)
HTC Focus 3 £1300
HTC Vive Pro 2 Kit £1300
Valve Index Kit £919
Most of the above are not standalone, and some don't have eye tracking and all the other sensors like the Quest Pro has. Pico is budget, and it shows in the build quailty and quailty control. Also If you want the CCP to have your data, track your home, carry on. But you choose who is the lesser evil, Meta or CCP...
429 vs 1799eur where I live
Not really an Apples to apples comparison though, you're comparing a 128GB budget version against a 256GB premium headset, with advance controllers and hardware.
Do you prefer the CCP tracking your home and activities as they have great interest in data farming the West or Meta? Which is the lesser evil?...
Super Comparison. I have Pico4. He has a strong distortion. Bad face mask. There are statters when using Wi-Fi.
What I don't like about Pico 4 is the glare :c
I can hear the quest 2 fan if it's really quiet in my room
Q2 fan is really quiet compared to P4, you can also feel in on your face.
@@Blix8 Humm, idk but I hear it but it's about the same as quest 2, I only hear if it real quite in my room, and I haven't felt any air blowing on my face. 🤷♂️
QP has much better wifi, even in wifi 6 it works in 160MGz mode, and in future it can get 6e support
Very good video, but myself and a lot of other vr gamers can`t see a 1,000 plus improvement. It`s like comparing apples to oranges.
I get that, but In a world where varjo aero costs 2500 and a Vive Pro eye system costs 2000... a pimax 8kx costs 1.3-1.5k, a Vive Pro 2 full kit costs 1.4K getting this level of headset with eye and face tracking included is not outside the norm for pricing on high end VR gear.
I think the Pico 4 Pro that DOES include face and eye tracking for ~$900 will be interesting and the real competitor to Quest Pro.
@@cbutters pico 4 PRO has eye and face tracking and costs 550$. This thing was overpriced as hell... Their cost per unit was 750$ but they decided to price it double.
This should have never exist... Instead, around april last year, they should have released a quest 2 pro at around 599$ with the same pancake lenses, 2160x2160 mini-led screens, elite strap AND, just like pico 4, have 8gb of ram and max out the clock speed for the CPU. Keep the same passthrough from quest 2, no eye and face tracking, no new cpu and, of course, no self-tracked controllers. Boom... you have a winner.
The lens reflection(godrays, smear) is terrible on the Pico 4 and its directly in the center of the lenses. But at least its better then on Fresnel lenses. For sure the Quest Pro is the winner(content, lenses, comfort...)
You forgot to mention the Pico 4 is half the price of Quest Pro. A fairer comparison would be Quest 2 vs Pico 4 based on price point.
I think it's a personal opinion preference, I have Pico 4 and quest 2 and quest pro but I have to say for the money Pico 4 win's 100x! If you want to compare quest pro you need to compare with Pico 4 pro. The only downside of Pico it's the fact that don't have lots of games! But if you have a really good pc gaming for VR then you will rock with Pico 4! As a stand alone Pico 4 needs more work with the OS! But I think if quest 3 comes out next year they need to copy Pico 4, I just wanted only one game to be available in Pico 4,, population one
Yes I agree, from a value per dollar, Pico is the winner, but the pro is still a technically superior device in every way except resolution.
Copying the Pico 4 would not be great. One of the reasons why the Quest 2 is so popular is because of it's modability with third party companies. As far as I can see the Pico 4 is a single unit like the Quest Pro. It will be interesting from a battery perspective if they move it to the back, I'm guessing they won't because of that modability, so I'm expecting a simiar design but just make it a sleeker, lighter device with pancake lenses, XR2 gen2 and a unified stereoscopic colour passthrough (no doubling up on b/w cameras).
the only games you really miss out on are the ones only in the quest store. sidequest is loadable on pico and you can always get a pirated version of meta only games.
Paying £1500 to break your forehead in? Bargain! I think I'm gonna stick to the Pico 4.
play with 1.5 x speed, thank me later.
Your bias stinks
Correction the Pico streamer is hot trash even in HD mode. It's absolutely unusable. Looks like 360
That's what I've been hearing but what about virtual desktop?
@@sidney1234uscit's much better.
@@nitind ok cool
Pico has terrible lenses! Quest pro is much better
My Pico 4 had such distorted lenses with everything changing geometry and warping I actually returend it and stayed with Q2 !! as it has nothing like it. Very dissapointing.
@Game Over Yeah, probably, but it felt like software issue, wrong distortion correction profile maybe.
I have both…the fov on pico is better…106 Hfov on the pico and 96 on Q pro…and the colors on the Q pro are very saturated and orange looks red! On the pico colors are more realistic and brighter displays and deeper blacks.
I don't know where you are getting 96 for your HFOV on the Q Pro, that is its Vertical FOV,
The quest pro has a 106 HFOV (108 rendered) the Pico 4 only has a 104 degree rendered HFOV
Don't believe me?
Sources:
vr-compare.com/headset/metaquestpro
vr-compare.com/headset/pico4
However you are right if you mean that the Pico has better Vertical FOV, much better in fact... (96 vs 104), however I find that you have to remove the facial interface to actually use that FOV which is not comfortable; but I'm excited for high FOV facial gaskets that might be coming soon for Pico4 that will make it a real FOV beast.
Also don't get me wrong I love the pico 4; but the panels I have; the QPro is definitively brighter, and deeper blacks, the pico looks washed out in comparison (see my video through the lens shots at 9:56)
@@cbutters Yes…talking about Vfov 96 and I got HFov 106
@@cia4gent128 I figured, but you can't just randomly compare one devices HFOV to another devices VFOV, it doesn't give any valid comparison.
@@cbutters But Vfov on the pico is 104..so it still higher.
I don't think you read my full message earlier, click "read more" up above, I absolutely agree with you about the VFOV.