The atmosphere must have become electric there watching these two prodigies take on each other & fight till the very end , both kramnik & kasparov at their very top performance!!!! best match ever seen.
what a privilege those arbiters must have being sat right at the board with the players watching the action unfold !! i would pay to have that seat for a single game between these 2 players :D
prince paolo robles I was happy it happened. It allowed me to re-analyze the position where it was no longer a game of Book moves - unless this is one of the Games that highlighted for the public the fascinating complications arising out of it....
I don't know much about that game but I found little bit of time went somewhere... 9 min of game play time and may be 30 sec start and finish... That is why that psychologist named Albert's picture is there... Approaching light velocity and watching from ground is a madness... But it is helpful here...
@@princepaolorobles6403 It makes no difference what the time control is. This is supposed to be a gentleman's sport. You will abide by the rules or you don't play at all.
@@WeCube1898 For older chess engines it is somewhat true but for alphazero/leela/new stockfish that's totally false. These learn everything by themselves.
@sudhir Not really. These engines are over 3500 ELO. Magnus has as many chance against these as you have against Magnus. 700 ELO difference means you have no chance at all.
I hate being biased but kasparov has some Psychological issues with Kramnik for some reason but strength wise..he is the GOAT!!!!! for me after looking at many of his games.
Kramnik was very hard to beat. His game was super precise, and Kasparov attacks that worked with other GMs mostly didnt work against Kramnik. Eventually, Kramnik learnt that Kasparov would take more risk, and beating Kasparov is a matter of making Kasparov self defeat himself by overstretching his own games. By the world championship 2000, Kramnik even traded queen early, and tiring out Karparov with boring Berlin defense. But it worked. Hats off to Kramnik in finding a way to beat the 100 eye Baku monster. I used to hate Kramnik, calling him Drawnik along with his anti-fans. But I've grown to admire his style. Kramnik simply understands chess positionally better than Kasparov.
@@wintersoldier5769 Anand had the same psychological problem vs Kasparov. Eventually, he had even bigger psychological problem vs Carlsen due to Carlsen universal style and lack of weakness. If he had played his usual fighting chess vs Carlsen, I believe he would have fared better than his 2 world championship chances vs Carlsen.
@@chessten bullshit kramnik could beat kasparov in 2000, it was just a rigged games (fixed and faked). Kramnik even lose in candidate to shirov that year. Kasparov played like shit, when he down point he agree to drawn in 13 moves with white lol
@@jojoaja6106 dude ... just check their head-to-head record. Kasparov back then had problems vs Kramnik. Now that you quoted Shirov, Shirov had absolutely rubbish result vs Kasparov. Even Kasparov had no interest in playing Shirov, which would be expected to be terribly lopsided.
@@asamiyashin444 yes... these days chess is complete memorization nd shit.. very boring.. the players only think about themselves wanting to win or draw.. missing those old days where the so called Tal sacrifices everything for the auidence😭😭... missing those days
What was result ? Maybe draw and Kasparov won Armageddon by black pieces? I hate to say this, I am 1800 eloplayer and 2000 at lichess but most of the youtube videos I cant see result. Maybe getting too old at age 45, but please, can you tell result of the game more clearly ! I dont know who won this Armageddon.
No, that would be too easy. The idiots who are happy here and write great comments don't care about the result either. The bad background music, bad camera angles, those hype commentators screaming at the top of their lungs, that's important.
bro kramnik looked older at 20 than at 30 hahaha wtf is that hairstyle, 20 years old looking like he's 55 already
HAHAHAHHA
That time look old was popular
The atmosphere, and the camera work is 100 times better than last world championship
HAHHAHAHA
Yes, it's because players today are wimps. Chess is so dead, Fischer was right about everything.
@@stefanmilanovic85 I agree 100%. Computers have ruined it.
@@Dentspeed how computers have anything to do with the atmosphere.
@@KochariAsgar >bar goes down
>OH NO THAT IS A BLUNDER
"Kramnik is speed specialist." How the times change.
I remember being there watching this game from the audience. Maurice Ashley kept you in it , his commentary was great!
Never thought garry might struggle to beat lennon.
Sean Lennon?
@@richyalexander9206 Lennon Aronian
John lennon
He meant Lenin
Vladimir Lenin
🤣🤣🤣👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
This was the most entertaining chess match I've watched in a long while.
didn't know they used to comentate chess games like horse races in the 90s
ya, and there's no engine before! i mean not strong as today
The emotion, the passion,...
i feel you bro
That is what is missing from this machine like time. Not only in chess but in all fields.
@@asamiyashin444 everyones saying chess is boring these days.. but boring chess is interesting to some people.. u cant argue on that
Chess nowadays is all about concentration, memory, and endurance..
The hair!
Holy shit, how old is Maurice Ashley?
The engines say "+2"
@@brandondaniels9471 BAHAHAHAHAHHA
55
The best commentating duo of all time
I must agree!
Who was commenting? Was one of them Maurice Ashley?
@@ArranVid Maurice Ashley & Daniel King
The atmosphere must have become electric there watching these two prodigies take on each other & fight till the very end , both kramnik & kasparov at their very top performance!!!! best match ever seen.
I agree 100%. Without an engine calculations spoiling it. It is enjoyable to watch, how mysterious chess is, or things the move you didn't expect.
Kramnik had no procedure at that time. Good times.
Pretty pathetic how you repeated the mid game to stretch the video to 10 minutes.
there's no repetition
@@princepaolorobles6403 yes there is!!
@@princepaolorobles6403 There certainly is.
@@princepaolorobles6403 then it might be a blip in matrix 😂
there is repetition and I had to skip another 2-3 mins
This is how tense music sounded in 1995
LOL!
Como se llama la musica de fondo?
Nice but did it need drums in the background
back then I didnt have acces to these matches, thank you internet
we are blessed
Just comment who's GM you want to see playing in the late 90's
pls more from Kasparov
MrGitarix I will upload Kasparov vs Ivanchuck!
sounds great
where do you get videos??
you need to buy this video series
This is MADNESS!
Madness?
online games have killed this thrill but games growing okk
well, there's a pandemic. I hope OTB soon
what a privilege those arbiters must have being sat right at the board with the players watching the action unfold !! i would pay to have that seat for a single game between these 2 players :D
love these commentrators
I am absolutely impressed. I had NO idea that Jaime Bayly was such a good chess player.
jajaja Baily está cerdazo ps tienes razón
Some of the game was replayed in the video
Yep. Happens at 5:04
Sorry for my bad editing
prince paolo robles I was happy it happened. It allowed me to re-analyze the position where it was no longer a game of Book moves - unless this is one of the Games that highlighted for the public the fascinating complications arising out of it....
taking with two hands was this allowed back then ?
Very very interesting
Две легенды. Two legends
Blyat
@@07aniketdeysarkar26 suka
did you really stretch it to 10 mins like this?
lol I was so confused why the video rolled back to the start. Now it makes sense
There was that repeated section, which didn't help.
It's an old video, so probably an issue with the tape it was recorded in or something
It's so weird not hearing any coughs
Kasparov used 2 hands at 10:31 is that legal?
yes that time, there's no increment before
Great stuff! Do you have any more videos of 1994 intel gran prix?
yes a lot
What was the channel or network that broadcast the game?
Wow how long has Maurice been commentating lol.
Yes.
Why is it on repeat? Not full game.
I'm not sure, was it legal to use both hands like Kasparov did near the end of the game??
No it wasn't. It's Kasparov.
what chess set is that? amazing!
lol Garry where did you get this XXXL suit? Jesus, what a joke :))))
Best chess video I've ever seen.
Thankyou!
@@princepaolorobles6403 who won though?
I wonder what they talked about after the match, it was probably something from out of this world
and the disco music background lol😀
Do you think these guys could do well against Fabi,Magnus,Alireza?
Is that Maurice commentating?
Daniel king and maurice
I don't know much about that game but I found little bit of time went somewhere... 9 min of game play time and may be 30 sec start and finish... That is why that psychologist named Albert's picture is there... Approaching light velocity and watching from ground is a madness... But it is helpful here...
What that fuck epic game this was so electric Kasparov genius!!
Unbelievable stess. Who won, by the way?
kasparov
Hey guys! please watch my other video and play with me!
Kasparov using both hands to play his move (10:30); it's many of these little things that let you know he's a bastard.
easy bro, i think it's allowed that time, since it is in panic time
@@princepaolorobles6403 It is never allowed. Time trouble doesn't permit you from ignoring the rules.
@@JPCPSeto i mean it is blitz
@@princepaolorobles6403 It makes no difference what the time control is. This is supposed to be a gentleman's sport. You will abide by the rules or you don't play at all.
The question is, was that a rule in those years? Or is it new? Because if that was a rule he would inmediately had got disqualified.
What’s a pop filter?
A chess match commentator without bar evaluation is truly amazing
moving peaces with two hands? can you do it?
nope
How much pressure damm
The Prince of All Nerds gradually changing in shade of colour to match his own shirt
Wow the sequence that starts around 3:15 feels like they were in a ring punching each other. Crazy
The Beast Kasparov was ..Goodness... 🔥🔥🔥 Just Fire on the Board...
Beautiful background music.
I just wanna sound smart: Great game, masters. Love the way you move the bricks and all that!!
Can any GM beat Chess Engine, like alpha zero chess????
No one, but if there's odds maybe. but still small chance
Chess Engines and AI's like AlphaZero are the product of the collective knowledge of the elite players combined.
@@WeCube1898 For older chess engines it is somewhat true but for alphazero/leela/new stockfish that's totally false.
These learn everything by themselves.
@sudhir Not really. These engines are over 3500 ELO. Magnus has as many chance against these as you have against Magnus.
700 ELO difference means you have no chance at all.
Armageddon is a type of game in white black has less time than of white and if black able to it he wins the match.....
Garry won...
Now the background melody is soundtrack for fast chess games
Who wins at end or the game finished draw
Black!
I hate being biased but kasparov has some Psychological issues with Kramnik for some reason but strength wise..he is the GOAT!!!!! for me after looking at many of his games.
Kramnik was very hard to beat. His game was super precise, and Kasparov attacks that worked with other GMs mostly didnt work against Kramnik. Eventually, Kramnik learnt that Kasparov would take more risk, and beating Kasparov is a matter of making Kasparov self defeat himself by overstretching his own games. By the world championship 2000, Kramnik even traded queen early, and tiring out Karparov with boring Berlin defense. But it worked. Hats off to Kramnik in finding a way to beat the 100 eye Baku monster. I used to hate Kramnik, calling him Drawnik along with his anti-fans. But I've grown to admire his style. Kramnik simply understands chess positionally better than Kasparov.
Many kids here rating kramnik over than Anand just because he had a better record against Kasparov than anand
@@wintersoldier5769 Anand had the same psychological problem vs Kasparov. Eventually, he had even bigger psychological problem vs Carlsen due to Carlsen universal style and lack of weakness. If he had played his usual fighting chess vs Carlsen, I believe he would have fared better than his 2 world championship chances vs Carlsen.
@@chessten bullshit kramnik could beat kasparov in 2000, it was just a rigged games (fixed and faked). Kramnik even lose in candidate to shirov that year. Kasparov played like shit, when he down point he agree to drawn in 13 moves with white lol
@@jojoaja6106 dude ... just check their head-to-head record. Kasparov back then had problems vs Kramnik. Now that you quoted Shirov, Shirov had absolutely rubbish result vs Kasparov. Even Kasparov had no interest in playing Shirov, which would be expected to be terribly lopsided.
looks like Gary needed a high chair to play Kramnik
Kramnik was tall :0
Pretty sure he still is.
That comment is the height of ignorance.
His nickname is Big Vlad.
Is that a queen endgame?
Wow what a match!
Who win
Kasparov!
prince paolo robles why i dont understand
kasparov is pawn up, that's why kramnik resign!
its armageddon game, draw is enough for kasparov
yes ! that's true
nice game with veryy good commentry
Camera angle is better than today.
Who win???
Kasparov, in armageddon white has 5 min and black has 4 min , but if the game ends with a draw, black wins.
I thought that was Maurice commentating.
Каспаров своими руками всю доску перегородил и не давал сделать ход. Хорошо, что Крамник его долбанул.
I wanted to watch something calm before bed goddamnit!
Now I want to go hunt animals or i don't know I'm hyped for anything!
Who win?
KASPAROV
When chess was chess.
missing the old days
As opposed to what? Chess is still chess...
@@gtgaxiola Now it's too much computerized and chess players are more machine like. I'm not an expert but that is what I feel.
@@asamiyashin444 what u feel is absolute truth
@@asamiyashin444 yes... these days chess is complete memorization nd shit.. very boring.. the players only think about themselves wanting to win or draw.. missing those old days where the so called Tal sacrifices everything for the auidence😭😭... missing those days
What is result 🤔
A draw, which in Armageddon means a win for Black, since he starts with 1 less minute.
What a game! 🔥
Today it's Nepo vs Carlsen.
More like a one man show nowadays..
The hair!
What was result ? Maybe draw and Kasparov won Armageddon by black pieces? I hate to say this, I am 1800 eloplayer and 2000 at lichess but most of the youtube videos I cant see result. Maybe getting too old at age 45, but please, can you tell result of the game more clearly ! I dont know who won this Armageddon.
KASPAROV
No, that would be too easy. The idiots who are happy here and write great comments don't care about the result either. The bad background music, bad camera angles, those hype commentators screaming at the top of their lungs, that's important.
I mean so many illegal things happend where is the arbiter
Nope using both hands is legal since the time is so short
The commentary is op
Wow ..Amazing game ..👍
What a legend
Guy's 7ft tall
Music is dubadub ^^
HAHAHHAHA
Yes, we all came here for the music!
@@davidcopson5800 of course
Who won?
Kasparov won via a draw. Really!
Esas partidas son las que hacen que el ajedrez brille!
nice game
this looks like a scarry movie tf
LOL
کی برد؟؟Who win???
Kasparov
Onu hic karistirmam😊sole desem ilerlemis satranca bilgisayarlardan once o vardi😊
Compared to Kramnik, Kasparov physically looks like a child.
Looks like a horse run is on the board LOL
There were four horses on the board at one point.
Непонятно кто победил? Или ничья..
Was a draw. But Kasparov won because Armageddon.
اروع مباراة بلتز
ТАК ТО ТАМ ВЫИГРАЛ-ТО ?
Kramink win
@@71lupenzo710Kramnik lost here, because of draw.
Is that John Lennon?
Thriller.
what happened to the kramnik now?😂
i think he's mad HAHAHA
wtf @10:07 ?!?
Only Kramnik was able to defeat Kasparov
Not this time.