Minnesota has always had high rates of election participation. It has also always had high rates of high school graduation. The states with low turnout also have low graduation rates. There's a clear correlation between the two. And while high turnout might be due to voter fraud, high graduation rates cannot be. So it is at least plausible that there is some social factor that results in both turnout and graduation.
They can try all they want Indiana ain't going to turn blue lmao, but it shouldn't be happening at all to be honest. Ballots should have anti-counterfeiting measures so someone can't just mass produce ballots without state approval.
Dr. Frank, try reaching out to Carl DeMaio / Reform California. He has a web site and is actively trying to help California get on track. However, I did notice the CA wasn't that far away for the ideal box.
California did better than I would've guessed, but the games they played flipping a bunch of races a month after the election is damning enough. Thank you for the hard work
I was trying to figure out where the extra votes for Biden came from in 2020 and did something similar. Yeah, there's a lot about our federal elections that doesn't make sense statistically. About one third of the "voters" that made the difference in the 2020 election were in CA in 2020 and not in 2024 but the local lefties are blaming that on sexism.
the disparity in voter turnout between states like WY and MN could be explained by the electoral college and the fact that these states are swing states. A liberal in Wyoming would be way less likely to vote because they know the state is going to go red by 20+ points. Additionally, advertising and campaign efforts are specifically targeted at people in swing states, mobilizing a larger portion of voters. Other disparities in turnout in heavily liberal non swing states like WA, OR, or CO could be explained by mail in ballots and generally easier voting access. There are other reasons a voting population might be larger or smaller than them being more or less "patriotic." Yes, voter rolls should be cleaned up and we shouldn't have more than 100% of an eligible population registered, but to say that this means there is massive election fraud (in an election dems lost!) is a stretch.
It does cause a problem when there has been actual news videos showing individuals participating in fraudulent ballot harvesting, aided massive amounts of ballots being mailed to bogus addresses and to non-existing voters
Two blue states that narrowly didn't become swing states (VA, NJ) and two actual swing states (WI, MI) are claiming that there are more people registered that can legally vote in their state. NJ doesn't require an ID to vote and VA doesn't require a photo ID to vote, which means that there is a massive chance that at least 1/20 NJ votes are fake, given that a sizeable amount of Americans don't register to vote. Even a 2% change in certain states placed correctly could flip an election. In terms of percent change decrease in Trump's votes needed to flip the election, a 3.4% change in PA, a 2.9% change in MI, and a 1.8% change in WI flips it to Kamala. That's a 229,000 person vote swing. That's not even considering how this affectted local elections in places like CA. Is this not concerning to you, or did you just not think it thrrough?
@@douglasfrank5204 Georgia had the same issue - the only problem is that when the Secretary of State compared the people that voted to Death certificates, there were dead people who voted - ONE PERSON! Turns out they early voted and then died the day before election day. You can verify this through the AJC newspaper. So where is YOUR proof that dead people voted? Typical political BS on your part looking for excuses for the 2020 loss.
Dr. Frank, thank you so very much for this presentation and coming to us twice in Michigan. God bless you sir!
And yes, VOTE AMISH!
Lol
You were very entertaining and informative at our meet up in Iowa. Thank you, sir!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Minnesota has always had high rates of election participation. It has also always had high rates of high school graduation. The states with low turnout also have low graduation rates. There's a clear correlation between the two. And while high turnout might be due to voter fraud, high graduation rates cannot be. So it is at least plausible that there is some social factor that results in both turnout and graduation.
The teachers + young minds, a simple equation, really.
My wife is still registered to vote in Indiana and she's been dead for ten years!
They can try all they want Indiana ain't going to turn blue lmao, but it shouldn't be happening at all to be honest. Ballots should have anti-counterfeiting measures so someone can't just mass produce ballots without state approval.
Thank you!!!!
Well done. This is something that could easily be done by real journalists, or government watchdogs. I've shared this, and hope it opens eyes.
You expect journalists nowadays to do work?
Very cool!
Dr. Frank, try reaching out to Carl DeMaio / Reform California. He has a web site and is actively trying to help California get on track. However, I did notice the CA wasn't that far away for the ideal box.
Believe me, CA rolls are far from ideal... more to come.
Thank you for doing this hard work for such vital information.
Excellent analysis, sir. Now, how do we get all states into the green? I see my home state of Arizona is close.
Start a local team!
It's not "motor voter." It's "auto fraudo."
very interesting, indeed.
California did better than I would've guessed, but the games they played flipping a bunch of races a month after the election is damning enough. Thank you for the hard work
Same with Washington!
I was trying to figure out where the extra votes for Biden came from in 2020 and did something similar. Yeah, there's a lot about our federal elections that doesn't make sense statistically. About one third of the "voters" that made the difference in the 2020 election were in CA in 2020 and not in 2024 but the local lefties are blaming that on sexism.
where can I watch your 2020 election analysis?
FrankSpeech.com. Look for “Scientific Proof”
the disparity in voter turnout between states like WY and MN could be explained by the electoral college and the fact that these states are swing states. A liberal in Wyoming would be way less likely to vote because they know the state is going to go red by 20+ points. Additionally, advertising and campaign efforts are specifically targeted at people in swing states, mobilizing a larger portion of voters. Other disparities in turnout in heavily liberal non swing states like WA, OR, or CO could be explained by mail in ballots and generally easier voting access. There are other reasons a voting population might be larger or smaller than them being more or less "patriotic."
Yes, voter rolls should be cleaned up and we shouldn't have more than 100% of an eligible population registered, but to say that this means there is massive election fraud (in an election dems lost!) is a stretch.
OK so what. Show it caused an election problem.
It does cause a problem when there has been actual news videos showing individuals participating in fraudulent ballot harvesting, aided massive amounts of ballots being mailed to bogus addresses and to non-existing voters
You mean like all the dead people who have been voting?
How can there be more people registered to vote than there are people who are legally eligible to vote? Does that not matter?
Two blue states that narrowly didn't become swing states (VA, NJ) and two actual swing states (WI, MI) are claiming that there are more people registered that can legally vote in their state. NJ doesn't require an ID to vote and VA doesn't require a photo ID to vote, which means that there is a massive chance that at least 1/20 NJ votes are fake, given that a sizeable amount of Americans don't register to vote. Even a 2% change in certain states placed correctly could flip an election. In terms of percent change decrease in Trump's votes needed to flip the election, a 3.4% change in PA, a 2.9% change in MI, and a 1.8% change in WI flips it to Kamala. That's a 229,000 person vote swing. That's not even considering how this affectted local elections in places like CA. Is this not concerning to you, or did you just not think it thrrough?
@@douglasfrank5204 Georgia had the same issue - the only problem is that when the Secretary of State compared the people that voted to Death certificates, there were dead people who voted - ONE PERSON!
Turns out they early voted and then died the day before election day.
You can verify this through the AJC newspaper. So where is YOUR proof that dead people voted?
Typical political BS on your part looking for excuses for the 2020 loss.