This video is literally the best... I noticed how you really threaded the waters and was really careful with your words when you started to reference Zimmerman V. Trayvon Case!.
You can even charged on double liability. For example when you steal some else shirt. You can be charged for theft in criminal cases and held reliable in a civil wrong for plaintiff recover the shirt.
Wonderful explanation. I guess that in addition to money that one can be liable for in a civil case, it could could also mean possession of kids right? as in family courts
With regards to OJ in a criminal case, there is no place for emotions. In the civil case it still doesn't make sense to find someone who was acquitted criminally, yet find them liable.
How can a murder case be "business" related? How can say, OJ be found not guilty in criminal court yet have to pay money to the opposition's family if there are NO businesses involved?
hey i'm a bit confused.. I thought in the US there is no civil law like in EU but there's common law. This does not seem to be the case since you're teaching about civil law in US?
It seems like civil lawsuits are a backdoor just in case the criminal prosecutions dont work out. I always wondered how is that constitutional. Seems like another variation of _"double jeopardy,"_ imho.
Guilty = with malice. Without malice (intent) there is no crime, only a civil case. Example, you ran over a lady in your car, if there was no malice and it was strictly an accident, then no crime, but if you did it on purpose (with malice) then either murder or attempted murder. Also, in Indiana (probably the same everywhere) the rules of court (that take precedent over code) does not allow for any criminal actions, but only criminal proceedings. There is only one form of action, the civil action. The civil rules, also known as the rules of trial procedure, also apply to criminal proceeding, in so much as they do not conflict with the rules of criminal procedure. The only form of action does not conflict with the criminal rules. So it seems, all crimes are civil actions and the answers available in the civil rules all apply.
But isnt there always a possibility of someone masking their malice and just using the excuse of it being an accident or is would there be a substantial amount of evidence that can help determine whether there was malice or no malice without the need of the defendant confessing to anything. ( im new to this so if u could explain it that would be helpful thank u)
Guilt can't get the only determinant of criminal law breaking. An illegal immigrant that hops across U.S. boarders and runs across is obviously 100% guilty. Yet they are not charged criminally.
You do realize that there are costs incurred with prosecutions and jailings right? Deportation is the cheapest and most practical tool when dealing with illegal immigration.
@@marshallm7828 I did a lot of research and apparantly it’s too much of a stressful job for me to handle anyways.. I have no idea what job I wanna pursue tho 😭
Hi there, can you tell me about the low IQ people who are ' reefed' into criminal acts beyond their control, in other words, becoming the Patsy. Cherri
So how does situations like Injunctions for protection fall into Civil Law where majority of these are ex parte and also involves removing legally owned firearms before any due process takes place?
I'm still super confused. If I murder someone, doesn't that mean that I'm technically liable for their murder? Since defamation is a civil law, how do does defamation mean i need to pay money?
Defamation, look @ you tube, Johnny Depp trial happening now…. Airing of dirty laundry that has now become synonymous with Depp’s formerly good name. 😢
I disagree with you. Criminal cases are Civil Cases because the Plaintiff is the "State". Since the Plaintiff is a non-physical being, the "State" lacks standing. Further, criminal cases are civil because there's money involved such as Bonds, where the state holds a human as surety for the Bonds.
what is the reason for civil cases existing? you have criminal cases because punishment is required to be a deterrent for committing crimes, but why do you need civil cases?
Consent to be Governed = Oath of a Public Servant....There is NO such thing as CRIMINAL LAW as per; 28 U.S.C. JUDICIAL & JUDICIARY PROCEDURE - ADMIRALTY, MARITIME & PRIZE CASES § 1333. According to the Historical & Revision Notes 1948 Act “ ... The "saving to suitors" clause in § 41(3) & 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler & more expressive of the original intent of Congress & is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ABOLISHING the distinction between law & equity.” (F.R.C.P. Rule 2. One Form of Action; There is one form of action - the CIVIL action.) Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases. Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition. defines “Admiralty” as; “A court exercising jurisdiction over maritime causes, both civil & criminal, & marine affairs, commerce & navigation, controversies arising out of acts done upon or relating to the sea, & over questions of prize. Also, the system of jurisprudence relating to & growing out of the jurisdiction & practice of the admiralty courts.... Also, the court of the admiral. The building where the lords of the admiralty transact business. In American law. A tribunal exercising jurisdiction over all maritime contracts, torts, injuries, or offenses.... 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS §1408. CIVIL ACTION (a) Jurisdiction The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action commenced under section 1401 of this title and this section by a COVERED EMPLOYEE. 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1401: PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS a) Filing & review of claims Except as otherwise provided, the procedure for consideration of an alleged violation of part A of subchapter II consists of- (1) the filing of a claim by the COVERED EMPLOYEE alleging the violation, as provided in section 1402 of this title; 2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1402: Initiation of procedures (a) Claim (1) Filing of claim To commence a proceeding under this subchapter, a covered employee alleging a violation of law made applicable under part A of subchapter II shall file a claim with the Office. The Office shall not accept a claim which is filed after the deadline applicable under subsection (d) (2) Contents of claim The claim filed under this section shall be made in writing under OATH or affirmation, shall describe the facts that form the basis of the claim and the violation that is being alleged, shall identify the EMPLOYING OFFICE alleged to have committed the violation or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, and shall be in such form as the Office requires.
I'm a computer science student no idea how i ended up here
Lol Im in med school. The youtube recommendation algorithm went crazy.
Bruh it’s 4am rn n am 17 why am I watching this
I'm 5
I am studying CPA for accounting haha
my teacher made me watch this
Same
:O
same
I'm a kid so I only watch this stuff by choice
Same
Extremely useful info thanks! I get confused about child custody issues that teeter between being abduction (criminal) and a custody dispute (civil)
Finals got me here - excellent breakdown, thank you!
Very clear and concise video, thank you!
Exactly
Thank you for the clarity!
Thank you Jay for the clarity.
wow what an explanation.simply loved it!!
Great shared
Explained: Civil Law vs Criminal Law
Very good and useful.
heyy! the intern from suits really did a glow up and got to places! way to go Harold!
I don’t know why I’m here, but I’m binging all of your videos.
thanks jeffrey epstein
Great explanation! Thanks dude
well explained
Thanks for the clarity!
This video is literally the best... I noticed how you really threaded the waters and was really careful with your words when you started to reference Zimmerman V. Trayvon Case!.
Thank you! Well explained
Really appreciate this. Thank you.
This video is amazingly to the point. Very helpful!
No it's not; it seems like it to dumb asses like you
;(
Thank you for this very good illustration 👏
Learned a wealth of knowledge.
Esp. the liability and guilty part,which I will use as the basis of the difference.
Cheers!
really helpful and clearly explained . thank you!
Amazing Mr .wow thank you so much
Very clear, Thank you!
Wow! Thank u for another knowledge sir
Thank you, it really helpful information, i just learned this important information. I am not a legal person but a legal translator in litigation.
well explanation. Thanks
Nicely said
with examples I like it.
You can even charged on double liability. For example when you steal some else shirt. You can be charged for theft in criminal cases and held reliable in a civil wrong for plaintiff recover the shirt.
The knowledge of the difference is great. But what to do when the judgement is pass down and they don't pay .....Please do tell
Thank you........ Dat dd help alot 🙌🙌🙌❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
He should be popular....your videos are so good 👍
Civil mainly focuses on resolution and not punishment. Criminal mainly focuses on punishment of the individual. The State prosecutes the individual.
Wonderful explanation. I guess that in addition to money that one can be liable for in a civil case, it could could also mean possession of kids right? as in family courts
great explanation!
really good. thank you
just a question if one is found not guilty on what basis can he be sued in the civil court ?
very useful info thank you so much
Thanks! I found this video very helpful.
I like the way u explained it thank you so much
Helps me to understand the difference.
Ty for your teaching
so helpful, thanks
successful, continue working greetings
Thank you
Very helpful.
You is good at explainening
Can the police enforce civil probationary periods?
This is a perfect video
Thank you, found that really helpful
Both C.P.C 683
Very helpful
Thank you!
great I wish I could learn law from out of the USA , wll done
My Question is does the penal code and criminal procedure Act applicable in civil matters?
Did you teacher send you a link.......
Thankyou so much
thank you!!!
Is there a jury involved in a civil case?
Criminal law defines wrongful conduct for which the state can take life or liberty..nice video..
Very clear
With regards to OJ in a criminal case, there is no place for emotions. In the civil case it still doesn't make sense to find someone who was acquitted criminally, yet find them liable.
Professor. Do you practice law? I need legal help. Can you direct me to someone that can help?
no
thank you
How can a murder case be "business" related? How can say, OJ be found not guilty in criminal court yet have to pay money to the opposition's family if there are NO businesses involved?
That is a great question.
So why do we have different definitions for one case first place?
Hello new friend watching from southern leyte Philippines
nice!
hey i'm a bit confused.. I thought in the US there is no civil law like in EU but there's common law.
This does not seem to be the case since you're teaching about civil law in US?
Sir . it's good work on internet.thanks.plz made 500videos on english vocabulary words with synonyms please please upload on internet
Who do I talk to about police harassment in Sacramento California area
It seems like civil lawsuits are a backdoor just in case the criminal prosecutions dont work out. I always wondered how is that constitutional.
Seems like another variation of _"double jeopardy,"_ imho.
Very well explained.Thank you!
Using info to guilty mental try trick huge payments
Pov me : *flopping around in confusion*
Guilty = with malice. Without malice (intent) there is no crime, only a civil case. Example, you ran over a lady in your car, if there was no malice and it was strictly an accident, then no crime, but if you did it on purpose (with malice) then either murder or attempted murder. Also, in Indiana (probably the same everywhere) the rules of court (that take precedent over code) does not allow for any criminal actions, but only criminal proceedings. There is only one form of action, the civil action. The civil rules, also known as the rules of trial procedure, also apply to criminal proceeding, in so much as they do not conflict with the rules of criminal procedure. The only form of action does not conflict with the criminal rules. So it seems, all crimes are civil actions and the answers available in the civil rules all apply.
But isnt there always a possibility of someone masking their malice and just using the excuse of it being an accident or is would there be a substantial amount of evidence that can help determine whether there was malice or no malice without the need of the defendant confessing to anything. ( im new to this so if u could explain it that would be helpful thank u)
like it
im just a jhs wanting to be a civil lawyer😩
Why isnt the law a subject in school for kids?
Looking for an answer in a debate regarding Johnny Depp’s defamation trial…. Who pays the civil servants working in that courtroom? Anybody?
Don't you think the names of the people who got killed should be also called? not only the people who killed them? Good video overall. Thx
Yay!
why me, as a veterinary nurse, i have to learn about this
Guilt can't get the only determinant of criminal law breaking. An illegal immigrant that hops across U.S. boarders and runs across is obviously 100% guilty. Yet they are not charged criminally.
You do realize that there are costs incurred with prosecutions and jailings right?
Deportation is the cheapest and most practical tool when dealing with illegal immigration.
I’d say beyond a reasonable doubt is more like 99%.
this is 2022 and my teacher made me watch this
LAW COURSE has tortured me for a long time, damn it!!!
Is it that bad?? I wanna become a judge, maybe more on the civil side😭Is it worth the studying?
@@saraahmadi3419 if you love reading a lot then yea go for it
@@marshallm7828 I did a lot of research and apparantly it’s too much of a stressful job for me to handle anyways.. I have no idea what job I wanna pursue tho 😭
Hi there, can you tell me about the low IQ people who are ' reefed' into criminal acts beyond their control, in other words, becoming the Patsy.
Cherri
Carrying out criminal acts requires complex thought and action. These patsy play dumb but they know whats up.
So how does situations like Injunctions for protection fall into Civil Law where majority of these are ex parte and also involves removing legally owned firearms before any due process takes place?
how did i get here
I'm still super confused. If I murder someone, doesn't that mean that I'm technically liable for their murder? Since defamation is a civil law, how do does defamation mean i need to pay money?
Sure if 1) you get caught and 2) convicted
Defamation, look @ you tube, Johnny Depp trial happening now…. Airing of dirty laundry that has now become synonymous with Depp’s formerly good name. 😢
what if you have 100 %
What do you think?
I disagree with you. Criminal cases are Civil Cases because the Plaintiff is the "State". Since the Plaintiff is a non-physical being, the "State" lacks standing. Further, criminal cases are civil because there's money involved such as Bonds, where the state holds a human as surety for the Bonds.
im 5 yrs old
Sameeee
OJ Simpson paid the court under the table 💯
In a criminal case, everyone should challenge jurisdiction. The court cannot prove jurisdiction. I accept all challenges to this statement.
what is the reason for civil cases existing?
you have criminal cases because punishment is required to be a deterrent for committing crimes, but why do you need civil cases?
Jesus Christ loves you
Consent to be Governed = Oath of a Public Servant....There is NO such thing as CRIMINAL LAW as per;
28 U.S.C. JUDICIAL & JUDICIARY PROCEDURE - ADMIRALTY, MARITIME & PRIZE CASES § 1333.
According to the Historical & Revision Notes 1948 Act “ ... The "saving to suitors" clause in § 41(3) & 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler & more expressive of the original intent of Congress & is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ABOLISHING the distinction between law & equity.” (F.R.C.P. Rule 2. One Form of Action; There is one form of action - the CIVIL action.) Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases.
Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition. defines “Admiralty” as; “A court exercising jurisdiction over maritime causes, both civil & criminal, & marine affairs, commerce & navigation, controversies arising out of acts done upon or relating to the sea, & over questions of prize. Also, the system of jurisprudence relating to & growing out of the jurisdiction & practice of the admiralty courts.... Also, the court of the admiral. The building where the lords of the admiralty transact business. In American law. A tribunal exercising jurisdiction over all maritime contracts, torts, injuries, or offenses....
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS §1408. CIVIL ACTION
(a) Jurisdiction
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action commenced under section 1401 of this title and this section by a COVERED EMPLOYEE.
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1401: PROCEDURE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS
a) Filing & review of claims
Except as otherwise provided, the procedure for consideration of an alleged violation of part A of subchapter II consists of-
(1) the filing of a claim by the COVERED EMPLOYEE alleging the violation, as provided in section 1402 of this title;
2 U.S.C. THE CONGRESS 1402: Initiation of procedures
(a) Claim
(1) Filing of claim
To commence a proceeding under this subchapter, a covered employee alleging a violation of law made applicable under part A of subchapter II shall file a claim with the Office. The Office shall not accept a claim which is filed after the deadline applicable under subsection (d)
(2) Contents of claim
The claim filed under this section shall be made in writing under OATH or affirmation, shall describe the facts that form the basis of the claim and the violation that is being alleged, shall identify the EMPLOYING OFFICE alleged to have committed the violation or in which the violation is alleged to have occurred, and shall be in such form as the Office requires.
Trayvon Martin is the young mans name! And it wasn't an altercation! Speak the truth not what is comfortable! This is a terrible video!