Noncontingent Reinforcement

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 бер 2017

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @codeagent47
    @codeagent47 6 років тому +1

    Thank you! You're awesome, and we support you!

  • @natalies405
    @natalies405 5 років тому

    Love these videos! Is NCR the same as NCE (E =escape)?

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  5 років тому

      I’ve personally never heard of that. However, if escape is the reinforcer and you can allow it to happen non contingently (no asking, no hand raising, not dependent on anything) then i suppose it could be an example of it. 😊

  • @Kengiedengi
    @Kengiedengi 6 років тому +1

    Can you give an example of NCR with extinction, and NCR without extinction?

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  6 років тому +5

      Kendra - you deleted your other awesome question! And we just prepared a long response to you. LOL. So I'll include that here as well.
      NCR is separate from extinction - remember with NCR we are delivering the reinforcing stimulus that may be maintaining the problem behavior on a time based schedule. That by itself is INDEPENDENT of extinction. Meaning that if the problem behavior does occur then it may be reinforced (not saying you want to) - just that you are decreasing the value of that reinforcer by applying it at other times (motivating operation - abolishing operation specifically).
      However - in practice (I consulted with two BCBAs this morning) it is done in combination with extinction. Meaning you deliver the expected SR on a time schedule UNLESS the problem behavior has occurred within a given amount of time (30 seconds as an example).
      So it really is a two fold procedure - abolishing the value of an SR and putting the problem behavior on extinction.
      Does that help?

    • @Kengiedengi
      @Kengiedengi 6 років тому +1

      PsychCore Yes that helps A LOT!! I'm sorry for deleting my other comment - I thought it was too confusing lol. Thank you so much! You are helping me get through grad school :)

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  6 років тому

      I'm glad we got an answer that helps. No worries about the delete - was just teasing you! We love tough questions like these. In fact we may use this in a future video. :-) Can you please contact us via a facebook message?

  • @mariaacosta9228
    @mariaacosta9228 2 роки тому

    My question is if I were to explain to someone how to execute an NCR step by step would it be right to say this Example: Mark will be provided access to escape every 5 minutes whether he has complied or not to a demand for 60 seconds. Escape will include the removal of demand and access to time to play with a toy (preferred reinforcer) during the 60s escape time. A timer will be set and escape will be denied despite Max engagement in the problem or compliance with the demand. I think I'm kind of confused about how to tell someone the steps to follow to properly execute an NCR schedule.
    Thank you for your response

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  2 роки тому

      I think that is a good example - albeit complex. Escape is hard to explain in this example - but I (Ryan) think you got it.

  • @SammieSunshineC
    @SammieSunshineC 5 років тому +1

    Is this like Differential Reinforcement?

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  5 років тому +3

      That’s both an easy and a hard question.
      No - as in differential reinforcement you are reinforcing a certain response only. In NCR you are reinforcing anything BUT a particular response.
      Which in a sense makes it differential - so kinda yes.
      But the effect of NCR is more about motivating operations and reducing the value of the reinforcer - so no. Lol.

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  5 років тому

      We help....

    • @kealepennington2376
      @kealepennington2376 5 років тому +1

      @@PsychCore So are NCR kinda like DRO's then in a sense.

    • @PsychCore
      @PsychCore  5 років тому +2

      That is definitely one way to look at it - but is genuinely up for debate. DRO has a contingency piece that NCR does not.