RUSSIAN NUKE MISSILE EXPLODES, RECORD HIGH LOSSES! Breaking War News With The Enforcer (942)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
- A Russian Sarmat missile exploded on the launch pad overnight during a failed Russian nuclear weapons test; it is assumed the test did not go according to plan. Russian authorities are facing at the same time an incredibly serious situation as Russian forces are losing record numbers over the past day, such a serious loss that the Russian air force is risking aircraft to bomb Ukrainian positons in Kursk. Meanwhile Russian forces are bieng hit heavily near Pokrovsk, once again grinding their offensive to a halt.
Tonight's fundraiser is for Revived Soldiers of Ukraine!
Support The Enforcer On Patreon:
/ the_enforcer
Join The Enforcer's Twitter:
/ itstheenforcer
Support The War Effort In Ukraine:
u24.gov.ua/
Day 942 Ukraine War Map:
www.google.com...
God that title made my stomach drop.
"Nuclear missile test fails" would have been better.
Kings of the clickbait headlines :)
That was a big fear that I had that Russia had moved some of their nuclear weapons to an ammo supply storage place and that got hit by Ukraine.
I heard the reason the silo exploded was because of a Ukrainian saboteur. From what I hear, he just stood on the silo door and his massive balls was too heavy to lift, so the missile just blew up.
The Soviet military capacity was a bluff. Everything made before 1991 must be taken with a grain of salt.
Yes your right they bluffed its the russian way of doin things nothing can be trusted in russia including all equipment its all neglected everything the planes the subs the cars the tanks the lot is neglected they are a complete joke nato would wipe the floor with them we do basic maintenance that alone would win the war against them lol
A bluff by whom, The American MIC in order to justify the creation and funding of its world-building war machine over the past 75 years?
They killed and displaced millions. Pure evil.
Still is.
Russian military jet motors have no spare parts, Ukraine produced the jet engines. The more they fly , the less they will fly.
The Russians have several jet engine makers today and going back to Soviet times.
you don’t understand russian approach. they have geran with jet engines but they produce both. its more economical 😂
Um no, russian military jets do not have motors,they have afterburning turbo fan or turbo fan jet engines, motors are electric and engines utilize combustion. Russia's military industry is located in the heartland of Russia and their jet engines are manufactured by manufacturers that are not in Ukraine but are in Russia itself.
THE FIRST RULE OF WAR NEVER UNDERESTIMATE YOUR ENEMY
Unless it's Russia.
Россия превратится в стекло, если она свяжется с НАТО. Давайте не будем себя обманывать. Мир.
I’m watching now late. Russian missiles launch failures isn’t surprising. When silos were decommissioned, it was found 70% of Nuclear lCBM missiles would have destroyed themselves during launch in the silos. Rusty faulty relics.
not with nuke attached, but the fuel destroyed the silo. They didn't maintain stuff
1500 casualties in 24 hours = 62.5 casualties and hour...= slightly more than 1 EVERY MINUTE
There are multiple platforms that can deliver nukes, submarines, surface ships, land based silos, or airplanes. Lets not confuse their difficulty with one platform with an inability to deploy nuclear weapons.
12:10 to skip to the start
Also 9:00 to hear bee- beep booms! I love that part!
You can't make a missile out of washing machine and microwave chips I'm surprised it even got out of the silo
Ineptitude.... thank goodness!
If only 1 in 6 of thier nukes work, then you still gotta factor in the defenses of the country they’re targeting. Just because they launch don’t mean they’re not intercepted.
What Putin also knows is that the failed nukes may blow up in Russia.
Also factor in if 4 out of every 5 missiles fail to launch and perhaps detonate, for every 1 nuke that could potentially hit a European or US target, 4 have potentially just detonated in Russia. That is without Europe or the US having to respond.
It would be like you really hate someone, but the rules state that you have to shoot yourself 4 times for every time you try and shoot the person you hate. And the person you are trying to shoot is also wearing body armour.
I get what you're saying but this isn't the only way they have to send nukes. But it doesn't look good for those methods either.
Yeah that blew up in the silo. Above ground structures were probably minimally affected due to the blast being focused upwards and outwards in a conical manner.
You know there’s videos out there for that nuke test launch explosion. Tests are recorded thoroughly.
Santa Barbara Local here!!! Super stoked you guys came through!! You are 100% correct, it's very beautiful but SB is ridiculously expensive!! The only way you get by here without a six figure income is you share rentals, most Cali minimum wage or slightly better paying jobs you will be sharing a room for rent. It is roughhhhhhhh!!! Anyways, thank you for all you do LSA!! You got a friend out here in SB if you find yourselves in this neck of the woods again!
is there a way to send you guys messages outside of live? being from the UK i never get to watch live, the stream is 3an to 6am,
Sorry Enforcer not to be critical of your analysis but with the close up of the site of the Russian rocket damage, all towers are in fact intact. You can see the shadows of the 4 towers and finely see the towers themselves, I guess they’re hard to see because they’ve been burnt.
Russian missiles on submarines aren't much better. At Kerch, where is the ammunition for the flak towers stored?
I'm thinking that Russia got all their rocket information from Boeing.
Also, the R36 that the R-28 Sarmat is replacing is capable of trajectories over the south pole. They are very similar missiles. I actually would have believed that R-28 launch to be an R-36 had you said it was such.
If I recall correctly, the one first successful launch successfully flew 32 kilometers before catastrophically blowing up.
The Russians cannot replace the technology and parts lost during the failed missile launch.
Let’s try a missile launch without Ukraine rocket engines! Total failure Pootin!
The crater at the launch site is the silo location, the rocket didn’t leave the silo!
The 101 freeway is named after the 101st Airborne ❤ there is a big plaque dedicated to the 101st between Santa Barbara and Ventura. I get a frog in my throat ever time I drive by it.
"I think it must be damp"
a note toward the end of the stream the full quote is "The customer is always right in matters of taste" meaning that they can buy anything that want regardless of what it is.
Regardless of if you, the clerk, think it is is bad taste to buy.
Don't say America doesn't have anything to shoot down a warhead just because they never say. America doesn't talk out there business or show off like Russia and North Korea to prove a point
Maybe they are 'failed' launches so we underestimate their capability
Imagine firing such a 1 in 5 'succes rate rocket' from a mobile vehicle. That's about as deadly as being a TOS-1 operator....
Not even the one kinda successful launch blew up after 2 minutes so really it's zero for five hahaha complete bag of shizit
i think the dirt color of the launch pad indicates drought. burning would give a darker color. would explain better why grass is affected and not trees, also combined with the explosion being off center
leaving the bridge intact gives the orcs an exit ramp
The C17 seats are for only flying Air Force personnel. Army, and Marines sit on empty milk crates, lol.
That "successful test of the Sarmat" on Wikipedia looks suspiciously like CGI. Anyone else notice that?
Good day, both Enforcers!
as a resident of lompoc which is next to vandenberg we have a ton of information given to us when ICBM test launches that go off here and i have to say when they go the ground here in in town shakes really well and the audible sound of the rocket is not mistaken when it goes
Russia to rename the failed SARMAT missile HAZMAT from now on.....🤣🤣🤣
It seems the Sarmat is launched similar to SLBMs . First a separate booster clears the missilw of the silo before dropping off and letting the missile's main engine take over. Minutemen could be fired irectly from their silos witbout a booster. The SLBMs use the booster to push through and clear the surface before firing tbeir own.
Yes, I see you know your firearms. Unfortunately, your engineering knowledge is lacking. Low tolerance = close fit. And vice versa! Sloppy fit therefore = wider tolerance!
i really don't think this is a joke. It only takes one successful launch to kill millions possibly.
I believe the Russian's missile issues are due to the fact they can't get the computer chips needed for them and they are trying to "re-learn" pre-chip missile systems.
No.
Do they have the capacity to launch missiles now? I'm sure this wasn't the ONLY silo -- but this facility is now out of commission, not just the loss of the missile, its a loss of the facility -- but will the other silos function? and how many silos were designed to handle these missiles in particular?
you can see the shadows of the towers in the aftershot so those towers are actually still standing you can see them
long may ineptness reign
@enforcermatt your satellite photos of the failed missile launch out of Russia still has the Shadows of the satellite Towers but the towers appear to have been deleted
I can see the towers. It looks like 4 towers are still standing. Everything is brown, from being sprayed with the dirt.
it exploded during fueling up. The 5th failed test.
The satellite photos may blend multiple photos taken at different times. That's the only explanation I can think of. It is was doctored, they'd remove the shadows, too.
@@scottk3292that makes the most sense. Towers are there but covered in dirt now.
I can’t say for sure but I used to look at these types of pictures for my work and I would say that it appears to be a shadow from the trees that would be growing along the edge of the the site that was cleared for the facility.
the shadow shows all the cranes are still standing...
You can see the towers tok
all 4 towers are standing, you can see casting shadows.
Hummm Sarmat forgot to blow away the shadows for the towers that are gone
Thank you for another great stream, and successful fundraiser.
if the weapons depots had exploded there would not have been green fine trees around the buildings 😂 but I'm no expert on Russian green super trees 🧐
They forget to use gold and silver in the connecters like in their airplanes and no maintain. it goes kaboom.
❤ appreciate your research and detailed comme❤
Great analysis; a delight to watch despite the frightening headline. It would appear, based on the shadows of the still standing radio antennae, x 4, still standing so close to the silo, it might suggest the missile exploded INSIDE a closed silo and the solid rocked fuel exploded like a giant shot gun shooting the debris straight up. Blown tests aside, We must never forget about Russia's 12 ballistic- missile submarines (SSBNs) with 192 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) ~ Great job @EnforcerOfficial xx ~M
Guys, something really odd about that second photo of the destroyed site with the nuclear missile test. On the first set of photos it was certainly odd the way the site was obliterated... and yet the bordering trees remained intact. Even more odd in the later close-up photos is the towers that are obliterated... and yet their shadows remain intact??? Now, I'm no expert, but...
You're no expert. The towers are still there if you look really closely. The tower colour matches it's surroundings.
What I think happened during the launch (its just a theory) The missile got out of the silo as we saw during the launch BUT its engine failed to start properly so the misile fell mostly back in and exploded. Reason I believe so is combination of the footage during a good launch where we saw the missile got tilted in a direction before start and the crater is also eliptic with leaving a longer mark towards north north west. Which would mean a little bit of that explosion was on the ground level and burned all grass. But I have no proof its just my theory.
The failure of the armata was once again due to pilthering of the funds to by more yachts no doubt, it looks good but has no real substance to speak of,an absolute failure 🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
back to the drawing board?
Putin's nukes are about as good as Hotdogman's streams...
How embarrassing for Russia! They can't risk using the Sarmat missile. But Sarmat isn't the only intercontinental ballistic missile Russia has got. There are 286 ICBMs able to deliver 958 nuclear warheads, some of them also from submarines.
Those mariners better pray on launch ; )
Russia has had MIRVS for a long time. What kind of crap are you slinging?
I live in Ireland 🇮🇪 and the only way people can afford a house in eastern Ireland is parents help and that’s why it’s so important to own you home l. Generational wealth is importance
My question is, in the SARMAT photo portraying the aftermath of the explosion where there's only one antenna standing, why is there still shadows of 3 other antenna as if they were still there in full?... Just curious, something I noticed.
Great stream tonight 🇺🇦💙💛
Thank God we don't have anything to worry about in terms of Russian capability ... they're clearly a bunch of losers! Good to know we don't have to bother building any more capabilities ourselves cause we already have all the intelligence we need to tell us we're just so far ahead of the competition. In fact, I think now's the time for me to take early retirement from my job as senior analyst with BAE. Thanks to you guys reporting this, I can sleep so much easier at night. Obviously no need to apply my own intelligence!
Seething 😂
They pretending it failed so we underestimate them
Long Blasting Punching Powder 😂
His nuclear tests might be a complete disaster and failure.However, we should acknowledge that he is very successful in the active measures against the west - a huge issue that the western world should address accordingly.
According to shadows on the Sat photo there are 5 towers standing.
Blew up under ground during fueling
If a Russian missile were to explode with a nuke attached will the Nuke detonate or just a dirty bomb environment
I don't think the nuke would detonate based on my youtube education.
Theres never been a successful launch technically on that launch the missile blew up after 2 minutes
I think, one thing, CORRUPTION and Vodka
Any Russians here
Blyat!
Would it be possible that the silo/ missile got hit by a drone.
i thought these silos were supposed to have basically a million automatic rifles in a circle around the lid as a means of defense? but it sure dont seem like any of that infrastructure existed?
No.
Is the Sarmat a solid fueled vehicle?
The fuel exploded by all accounts a dodgy mix apparently
With all the classified SpaceX launches, I always wonder what kind of weapons America has floating out there; I always wonder if the military has some sort of super advanced weapon to destroy things, like that missile silo, one so advanced no one knows what to look for.
What do you mean we don’t have anything to detect missiles coming from the direction of oh say Cuba
I have to know if there was a Russian talking on the phone in a trench near this site.
He was taking a dump
Your wrong about those four tower. They are still standing but hard to see. Looks for the shadows and you will see them.
They say no news is good news, suppose this means this is a great day 🤷
What a F click bait.
LSA! LSA! LSA!
Uhh... So, multiple of the Starship's have blown up during testing.
How on earth can you compare established tech with an experimental rocket lmao
@@AngeloXification Did you reply to the wrong comment?
@@Melanie16040no, he didn't. He's talking about your comparison of the starship to this rocket. This rocket is supposed to be a finished product. Starship is still very much in development and SpaceX does things far differently than any government does. Your comment is like comparing apples to turkeys.
Bro this is literally cope and you know 😂
25:57 Four towers still standing / casting shadows. The blast wave would pass through them I guess. That was one big fire cracker.
Did the S a r m a t explode with or without the nuclear warhead ?
Did you not watch the video at all?
glad the old intro is back :P it`s so good ^_^
Jesus easy on the titles my heart stopped....
Morning ! What means L S A ??
With such a low success rate could they even risk launching one? If 4/5 fail then would the nuclear warheads from those 4 detonate over Russia? If so they would risk doing more damage to themselves than their enemy.
Nukes won’t detonate if the rockets explode. Takes a super controlled detonation to squash all that fissile material into a super dense state to achieve critical mass.
Is better to launch than not launch at all. That's why ppl create rockets . Not to save them .
@@Triple.7 that makes no sense if you actually consider what I'm saying. If 4 nukes blow up over your own country than the 1 that gets through which may or may not get intercepted and will be followed up by a retaliatory strike you absolutely worse off using them. And actually even if they were successful that is not the point in having nukes. It's the threat that makes them powerful. This actually completely eliminates that threat. It's a big deal. North Korea is a bigger threat than Russia if the stats are indeed true.
@jasonpickens9839 lol, why would you make rockets to save them for a later war? Come on, man.. if you don't use them, what's the point of having them or creating them. If you have an island with rockets . I'm winning and will take your entire island. Wouldn't you still launch them? Either give up your island for ever you and your family or launch them to see if you can turn over the odds. basic warfare.
Why would anybody put nukes in a rocket that is tested, dummies? They are just testing the rocket not the nukes. It would be needlessly reckless to test them with the warheads
✔️ 2040 !!👍😉 LSA ✨
Glad you boys had a good vacation. Buckle up it's going to be a busy winter. Israel is going to be hot and Russia is buckling and collapsing meaning more big strikes. Leave hot dog man alone find someone else to make fun of. Most of the viewers have no idea who he is.
Just wondering ... are there any *_pro-Russkie_* UA-cam channels? Not that I'd watch them, but I'm wondering if they don't exist, or else the UA-cam algorithm just knows better?
'Times India' shows support for Putin
@@sabrepulse817 I've *NEVER* seen that in my feed. UA-cam must be using a form of _"AI"_ to show me things they *ASS-U-ME* I would like. 😀
_"Pro Putin"_ ... sure, as long as they can get cheap(er) crude oil from him. And India is the *'I'* in _"BRICS"._
Russia is a meme
92a is supply
Still using the ridiculous ten minute intro...
You talk about annoying music. What’s annoying to me, is your lead-in to start your videos. It’s the same thing every day, glorifying war. It’s the worst part of your channel.
Hey Matt what’s the issue about boomers? The generation of law and order, parents who struggled and sacrificed through the war years, the most private people you will meet. Where do you thing they have issues with entitlement, it’s the younger people who think of entitlement because they are lazy. Majority of your audience are above 50yrs.
Great stream. Watch you every night but rarely on the live stream. Excellent work. Can’t believe you’re both so young.
We all have seen Russia on paper and we have seen real results of Russian weaponry