American F-22 Raptor Vs Russian Mig-31 Foxhound | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
  • Install Raid for Free Mobile and PC: clik.cc/cdsTv and get a special starter pack 💥Available only for the next 30 days💥
    Check out the Store: growling-sidew...
    Join the channel if you wish to support
    / @growlingsidewinder
    APEX PCs: apexpartner.ap...
    If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
    / growlingsidewinder
    Join my Discord:
    / discord
    Social Media
    ________________________________________________________
    Instagram: / growling_sidewinder
    Twitter: / growlingaim9
    Facebook: / growlingaim9
    Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
    _________________________________________________________
    Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/2PQGYf2
    Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/2VSN4kt
    Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
    Contact me:
    GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
    Disclaimer: Please Note that I use sound effects to enhance my videos for dramatic effect and hopefully give the viewer more immersion and also I use reshade for some better colors. (you can download reshade yourself and use it to make your DCS look like mine).
    Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
    Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
    System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
    Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
    Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
    Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
    Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
    Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
    Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
    Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
    HeadTracker: Trackir5
    Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
    Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
    On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
    If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 725

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  Рік тому +69

    Install Raid for Free Mobile and PC: clik.cc/cdsTv and get a special starter pack 💥Available only for the next 30 days💥

    • @MississippiKid96
      @MississippiKid96 Рік тому

      Thank you for fulfilling my request

    • @MississippiKid96
      @MississippiKid96 Рік тому

      Also, I hope you had a happy thanksgiving!
      Thanks again bud

    • @716g9
      @716g9 Рік тому +1

      Growling Sidewinder… can you do F18 vs SU35F. American 🇺🇸 vs Russia 🇷🇺
      The BF3 dog fights

    • @numberyellow
      @numberyellow Рік тому +3

      i'd still like to see "NGAD" vs F-15 ACTIVE.

    • @lucaswar7989
      @lucaswar7989 Рік тому +2

      @@numberyellow NGAD VS F-15 STOL/MTD

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  Рік тому +1479

    Also please keep in mind these aircraft are simply mods and the true nature of their capabilities is classified so these models are scenarios are based on publicly available information and therefore may not represent the true capabilities of the aircraft. Hopefully we live in a world where the TRUE real life capabilities of these aircraft is never actually used. Thank you for watching and I'll see you in the next one, Much Love.

    • @Unpopularopinionbutitsok
      @Unpopularopinionbutitsok Рік тому +26

      Love the info detailing the specs about the aircraft. You did with the F22 v the F35. Keep it up

    • @Bad_Wolf_Media
      @Bad_Wolf_Media Рік тому +59

      I'm not sure if the DCS designers have tweaked things, but I recall your F-22 SEAD video where you obliterated an enemy airfield and planes taking off and the SAM sites didn't even get a sniff on the Raptor, not even when the bay doors were open.
      Forgetting real-world specs, even in DCS I find it tough to believe that a smaller airborne radar like the Foxhound would carry would outperform the larger SAM systems in defeating the stealth. That's why I think they might have tinkered with the -22 data to make it slightly less OP.

    • @doncalypso
      @doncalypso Рік тому +14

      Next one is to see how the F-35 would fare against the MiG-31...

    • @unclevampy
      @unclevampy Рік тому +47

      It has been my understanding throughout history the US typically understates its capabilities, and its adversaries tend to overstate theirs. Of course, one should always take the claims as a potential truth because underestimating the enemy would be fatal.

    • @nathaniellazo5912
      @nathaniellazo5912 Рік тому +12

      Even though these aren't 100% accurate, but still, seeing the Raptor have to do some work for victory was nice!!

  • @vladcojocaru8161
    @vladcojocaru8161 Рік тому +1201

    Please do more of these short stories and plane descriptions before combat! Gives a lot of context into what to expect during the fight.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  Рік тому +228

      Sure thing I enjoy making that stuff also. I’ll do it wherever possible.

    • @WRXXXual
      @WRXXXual Рік тому +16

      I want to echo your sentiment. Context is always a fine seasoning to life 👍

    • @cgefkens4065
      @cgefkens4065 Рік тому +11

      @@GrowlingSidewinder i agree. I would also really enjoy you just talking about the history and capabilities of these planes in general. Maybe a rundown of the mods or something

    • @krustdogg131
      @krustdogg131 Рік тому +3

      Agreed

    • @BeefSupremeAviation
      @BeefSupremeAviation Рік тому +3

      ^^ what they said

  • @tatsu5825
    @tatsu5825 Рік тому +486

    The MiG 31 is simply a brick marching through the atmosphere at Mach 2.8. I love this plane.

    • @rocketremity9571
      @rocketremity9571 Рік тому +33

      Phantom moment

    • @KalvyNoodle
      @KalvyNoodle Рік тому +27

      Just imagine a stealth interceptor using MiG-31 tactics

    • @arnavsadhu
      @arnavsadhu Рік тому +23

      You forgetting the cancer giving radar on the nose of it.

    • @danielelombardo8196
      @danielelombardo8196 Рік тому +18

      @@KalvyNoodle should be the concept around the future "Mig-41"

    • @notaulgoodman9732
      @notaulgoodman9732 Рік тому +15

      For a brick it flew pretty good

  • @malcadorthesigillite2541
    @malcadorthesigillite2541 Рік тому +589

    The brief history of the Foxbat was a really nice touch that goes a long way.
    I heard the Foxbat has poor maneuverability bc they used plain old steel wings rather than aluminum alloy.

    • @bojned
      @bojned Рік тому +87

      Foxbat (Mig-25) was incredibly heavy. Two cruise missile turbojets, slapped on the big slab of steel (to handle the heat of Mach 3 flight). Of course it does not handle well.
      Foxhound (Mig-31), although similar, has more efficient turbofans, better radar and avionics. But she is still fat and big.

    • @cleemccarthy1022
      @cleemccarthy1022 Рік тому +2

      Over the ocean.... Flat as a ping pong table😕

    • @tachikomakusanagi3744
      @tachikomakusanagi3744 Рік тому +8

      @Syntex366 Mustard is the reason I signed up to Nebula, I'm really looking forward to the B-2 doc coming up.

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 Рік тому +48

      It was so fast that they had to use steel or titanium because of the build up of heat, they used steel. It was never intended to be a dog fighter, it was designed to shoot down high altitude high speed bombers that were being developed in the US.

    • @malcadorthesigillite2541
      @malcadorthesigillite2541 Рік тому +2

      @@syntex3664 yeah I'm subbed to Mustard, Dark Skies and Found and Explained.

  • @CRAZYHORSE19682003
    @CRAZYHORSE19682003 Рік тому +237

    One other cool thing the MIG-31 can do it use a data link with other MIG-31's and share data, fire and guide weapons from other aircraft. It was ahead of its time.

    • @divoulos5758
      @divoulos5758 Рік тому +34

      Apple tactics before apple was a think
      It only conects with mig devices
      iMig 31

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou Рік тому +24

      All US 4th and 5th Gen fighters do this too. But yea the MiG31 was early with it. It is a bigger factor than most people realize! Having FDL is a HUGE asset!

    • @n.w.1803
      @n.w.1803 Рік тому +7

      @@MattH-wg7ou I think Sweden's Viggen had datalink of a sort, the JA37 variant. Not sure if they could display info to each other or just share the ground radar, though. F-14s were early with datalink, too, but probably just between individual planes and the carrier or E-2s.

    • @newlevelgamer5879
      @newlevelgamer5879 Рік тому

      Still can't defeat a f22

    • @MICLakVER
      @MICLakVER Рік тому +4

      @@newlevelgamer5879 f22 not actual combat tested

  • @Beanys728
    @Beanys728 Рік тому +18

    "I don't know if it sees me." calmly. Then with increasing panic in every syllable "I think it sees me, we're gonna pull up." lmao that was great

  • @fubaralakbar6800
    @fubaralakbar6800 Рік тому +67

    It took an F-22 to kill one of the those things, and it still gave you hell in the process.

    • @The_Cokester
      @The_Cokester Рік тому +3

      @Tylerrr324 yeah I agree. But we probably won’t know anytime soon.

    • @cineva-wb1pk
      @cineva-wb1pk Рік тому

      Missiles with better range, but has no chance in a closer encounter with the f-22

    • @fubaralakbar6800
      @fubaralakbar6800 Рік тому +6

      @@cineva-wb1pk In a close encounter, yes. But that's exactly my point. It's like the Bismark fighting an Arleigh Burke--I mean sure, the Bismark has enough firepower to vaporize the Burke in one go--if not for the fact that you could smash the Bizzie with cruise missiles before she even knew you were there. You could make the same argument for an F-14 going BVR with an F-22.
      Ah, but the F-22 is able to nullify the MiG-31s advantage by using stealth and good maneuverability to dodge the missile storm and get in close, to an environment where it is vastly superior. It would be like giving the Bizzie modern stealth and sensors, but leaving her weapons the same. Now she would have a pretty good fighting chance against a modern ship. That's basically what the F-22 did here, and that, combined with the fact that GS is a great pilot, is what gave the F-22 the victory.

    • @heatblast876
      @heatblast876 Рік тому +1

      Remember stealth is not always invisible on radar it will always gonna detect from a close range, by using strong radar/low frequency radar which make it easier to detect the stealth aircraft, but mostly it will detect on a close range. As you can see in the fight between F22 and Mig 31, first of all people thinks that the F22 raptor will not gonna detect on the Mig 31 radar and as it is an stealth aircraft which make it difficult to detect on radar and since the people thinks the F22 will gonna launch the missile from a long to medium range and make a formation towards Mig 31 and down shot that it, as the RCS of mig 31 which is huge around 15m2 compared to F22 RCS around 0.0001m2. But surprisingly the Mig 31 able to detect the F22 from a medium to close range quickly on radar compare to other 4 gen aircraft. Because it has strong radar which not an AESA radar, but a PESA radar but with greater power aspects on Mig 31 radar (backstop: radar name) compare to other aircraft PESA radar. Mig 31 able to see the F22 at the range of under 60 to 40 miles but can't get a lock, which is surprisingly, that makes it superior to the Mig 31 which is actually a true interceptor aircraft, but when you see the fight between such as the F22 against the 6 group of Euro fighter typhoon, the Euro fighter typhoon has advance AESA CAPTOR radar, but 6 of them can't even see at this range, while the 1 Mig 31 PESA backstop radar able to see in this range. Which means that the Mig 31 is having one of the strongest PESA radar of all the aircraft that can even challenge today modern to mid modern AESA radar. Which is totally an surprisingly standard.
      Even that Mig 31 able to launch the R37M missile maybe at the range of under 50 to 45 miles towards the F22, as you can see in the video the R37M was tracking perfectly towards the F22 target, but it miss in few meters inches, the missile guidance was good and it was tracking very well in both of the matches, but it miss few inches why because the F22 has superior in stealth features and EW suite that can able to jam the incoming missile or with the superior in stealth, because the missile knows where it is heading towards the target but can't get it as the F22 was superior in stealth and good EW suite that able to dodge the missile easily with an few inches.
      But if Mig 31 was having an medium range infrared missile with electric optical inertial guidance such as R 27ET which has range of about 60 to 80 miles, which finds the heat signature of the stealth aircraft, The R 27ET is the only long range infrared missile that has the range of about 60 to 80 miles, then the R 27ET would have been, bring a worst situation towards the F22, because stealth cannot hide the heat signature at all, but it can be minimize the heat signature by using limited heat process such as 5 gen engine and stealth capabilities but still it cannot hide the heat signature fully. And another thing the infrared missile doesn't show the RWR and MWR on radar, because it is not an radar guidance at all.

    • @jayvee8502
      @jayvee8502 Рік тому +2

      It took one F15 with AIM-152s to kill four Mig 31s in GS's previous videos.

  • @nunyabiz5151
    @nunyabiz5151 Рік тому +43

    Back in my military days, we used to track the Foxbats at mach 3+ on multiple occasions as they flew over the Mediterranean and North Atlantic oceans. Back then, Sweden would allow Russian overflights of their airspace. Once a contact was just past Sweden and punched to 2.5+ mach, we knew for sure it was a Foxbat. I'm certain they required engine changes when they RTB'd. Foxbat drivers liked to show off from time to time.

  • @ferdeboergd256
    @ferdeboergd256 Рік тому +196

    I don't know if it's a real life tactic, but in modern submarine simulation there is the tactic "reconnaissance by torpedo". If you know there's an enemy sub but can't detect it, you launch a torpedo hoping it, at least, makes the enemy nervous an reveals their position. Seems that's what the Mig did in the second round.

    • @ferdeboergd256
      @ferdeboergd256 Рік тому +15

      @Omar Khurshid it is very risky indeed and almost surely reveals you are there. It's only used when you know the enemy is there and you believe they have already detected you. So firing the torpedo doesn't really make things much worse

    • @T800123
      @T800123 Рік тому +7

      @John Doe "recon by fire" is absolutely what is used in the US Army. Can't speak for other branches, but I'm sure the Marines and Air Force use the same term. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Navy says the same, but submarines use a different term. The sub branch is pretty dissimilar from the rest of the Navy from what I've heard, and also torpedoes are somewhat uniquely equipped for the task. They have wires attached to them and can be controlled by the sub and given different orders until the wire snaps/is disconnected, so it would make sense to me that it would be uniquely suitied for just firing off and either pretending you have a target, or just sending it into the general area, knowing that the torpedoes own SONAR will pick them up and then can be commanded to attack that target.

    • @HamuraiC-137
      @HamuraiC-137 Рік тому

      @ems0428depends what you are doing. The ANA would “recon by fire” thus alerting tali’s to the assault. They would bug out and the ANA didn’t have to get into a gun fight. Very frustrating.

    • @georgechristian3902
      @georgechristian3902 Місяць тому

      Trust me. No sub captain is going to shoot a torpedo just to find out if there is an enemy sub in the area. Because it would tell the enemy exactly where their boat is. And give the enemy sub a huge advantage because unless they were lucky enough to shoot in the direction of the enemy sub, forcing it to move, it isn't going to move. If it's close enough the American submarine wouldn't even know it was there until the enemy fired on it from close range. Which is about the biggest "oh shit" situation in submarine warfare. And if they are to far off for a good shot. They know exactly where the other boat is and can quietly sneak up on it. The last thing a submarine wants to do is make noise.

  • @alibabasaluja6764
    @alibabasaluja6764 Рік тому +76

    The plane breakdown b4 the match took this Chanel to another level. Keep doing it.

  • @markdewland4865
    @markdewland4865 Рік тому +23

    I am genuinely impressed with how the mug-31 was able to see you for so long on radar, let alone fire a missile from such a long distance.

  • @spitfiremac
    @spitfiremac 10 днів тому +1

    I love how the only thing that can really keep the Raptor busy is the final boss from the 80-90's, which still manages to terrify every other plane in the sky.

  • @JEDocSlims
    @JEDocSlims Рік тому +5

    I don’t know when it happened, but somehow I’ve added into my vocabulary “hold this, my dude”, when I want anyone to hold anything, ever. As a consequence of watching these videos

  • @tippership
    @tippership Рік тому +128

    Really surprised at the Foxhound's gameplan here-
    The F-22's difficulty with a Foxbat or Foxhound- is while they're lobbing missiles- when they get closer- they know things are gonna get tough, so they should go back some distance to the side, and make use of their Mach 2.8 - Mach 3 speed- so AMRAAMS can't realistically hit them at all.
    Gotta do running passes at the F-22 - AMRAAMS won't have an easy time with a Mach 3 target ...
    And the F 22 attempting to chase a foxhound or foxbat ...well, i suppose it's a sneaky chase - but it'd be difficult and he could retreat to his S-300 area.
    And if that S--300's radar is a different wavelength, that's a problem....
    Wish we'd see one of these rare Mach 3 aircraft use that speed in a dogfight. Yes, even though for some of them the engines are gonna take a beating- but it's what ensures your invincibility
    Plus you're fighting a Raptor and your super powerful radar might find him occasionally- but you can't expect him to never be offensive

    • @popiwatv
      @popiwatv Рік тому +30

      You can't dogfight at mach 3 🤣 your turn radius would be the size of Texas

    • @comradeeverclear4063
      @comradeeverclear4063 Рік тому +19

      @@popiwatv OC didn't mean at a constant pace of Mach 3, just to utilize the speed, given a proper scenario 🙄

    • @MississippiKid96
      @MississippiKid96 Рік тому

      So the mig 31 can’t dog fight for anything..
      it’s only chance at survival period, is to stay beyond visual range.. and it goes absolutely no deeper than that (it’s just that simple)

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer Рік тому +13

      @@comradeeverclear4063 would have to be very clever to make use of straight line speed, as the MiG can’t turn very quickly while the F-22 can.
      Against the F-35, which is substantially slower, the MiG has more of a “launch and leave” option, but the chance of maintaining a lock while doing that seems very low indeed.

    • @Baconcatboy
      @Baconcatboy Рік тому +3

      No matter how hard you Soviet simps try to defend this jet the F-22 wins no questions asked

  • @jcpancha
    @jcpancha Рік тому +6

    DCS is definetelly an horror sim....the sound of the lock, the sound of the missile....blowing chaff all over the place and pummmmm missile on your nose....awesome

  • @hmsspitfire1525
    @hmsspitfire1525 Рік тому +18

    Love the explanation before it starts😊
    Thanks GS, always watching and enjoying

  • @supernoribushi
    @supernoribushi Рік тому +7

    That was close enough that I'd love to see a matchup between the F-22 and multiple Mig-31s. Definitely didn't expect how close a couple of those missiles came.

  • @Ryan-ny6lt
    @Ryan-ny6lt Рік тому +10

    YESSS! Love the brief with actual footage at the beginning. Feels more detailed and like a documentary, in a good way. Keep it up!

  • @chrissantoro404
    @chrissantoro404 Рік тому +4

    F-35 VS MIG 31 PLEASE!!

  • @georgewright3949
    @georgewright3949 Рік тому +20

    It would be so interesting to see how these stack up . But if we ever found out the exact range and capability of the MiG 31 vs Western aircraft shit would have hit the fan spectacularly

    • @MississippiKid96
      @MississippiKid96 Рік тому

      There’s stories about foxhounds intercepting Sr-71’s should check em out

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer Рік тому +4

      My guess is that the US has a very good guess as to the exact capabilities of Russian hardware.
      The Chinese probably have a close understanding of what US hardware can do, they might very well share that with the Russians if it served their purposes.

    • @georgewright3949
      @georgewright3949 Рік тому +7

      @@Justanotherconsumer no doubt the intelligence service can speculate in the realm of accuracy. I more mean if it ever plays out in a way that we (the comment section) can see clearly we're deep in the shit

  • @N-L3
    @N-L3 Рік тому +24

    Hey Growling Sidewinder, I love your videos so much, I have been with you since 2019 and you are my favorite youtuber. I am an aviation nerd especially when it comes to aviation in the Air force and Navy. And you have thought me so much facts and so many different strategies of experienced pilots. So much history of the aircraft and the countries that designed them. Thank you so much, I can't wait for you to hit 1 mil!

  • @WarriorKidd06
    @WarriorKidd06 Рік тому +8

    Very interesting battle. Loved the breakdown of the plane at the beginning. Some great close calls as well against his shots at you

  • @filipfinodeyev5719
    @filipfinodeyev5719 Рік тому +5

    Growling sidewinder should fly the Mig 31 against the F22 and try to workout how to deal with it.

  • @PhycoKrusk
    @PhycoKrusk Рік тому +11

    I definitely see the application here. A single MiG-31 is a challenge for an F-22: As stated, the Foxhound's radar is capable of seeing the Raptor, but it can't see it all the time, and doesn't seem like it can reliably guide missiles. Make it two MiG-31s, and the odds shift considerably.
    If Russia can maintain a ratio of more than 1 MiG-31 for every F-22, it seems like it would be an effective counter.

    • @comradeeverclear4063
      @comradeeverclear4063 Рік тому +4

      Not really, given exactly what the F22 is capable of. It's literally the most advanced, and most capable fighter on the planet.

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer Рік тому +11

      That’s a big if, given the state of Russia’s economy.

    • @alexjakobsson1171
      @alexjakobsson1171 Рік тому +1

      just need the link from voronezh class ground radar, and f22 wont have a chance

    • @essaidchibane6612
      @essaidchibane6612 Рік тому

      MIG 31BM is specialized for downing valuable targets. Not an F22.

    • @PhycoKrusk
      @PhycoKrusk Рік тому

      @@essaidchibane6612 And yet we see that with enough MiG-31s, it's an effective counter for the F-22. It doesn't need to _actually_ counter the F-22; it just needs to make the risk unacceptably high.
      That is the whole idea behind deterrence.

  • @rabeerajput1343
    @rabeerajput1343 Рік тому +8

    Mig 31s are basically the snipers in aircrafts. Hit and run and keep enemies guesing where the shot came from.

  • @Stinger522
    @Stinger522 Рік тому +14

    The Mig-31 putting up a challenge to the F-22 was quite a surprise. A pleasant one though.
    Now we need a BVR fight between the Raptor and the Tomcat.

    • @Davis2920022001
      @Davis2920022001 Рік тому

      He did one on the f14 vs mig25 or 31.... It's basically the same thing honestly. Plus the f14 radar is weaker than the Mig31 radar.

    • @jayvee8502
      @jayvee8502 Рік тому +1

      GS just killed 4 Mig 31s with one F15 with AIM-152s.

    • @heatblast876
      @heatblast876 Рік тому +2

      @@jayvee8502 that missile is not real. If it was aim 120d the F15 would have been dead or destroyed by the 4 or 2 Mig 31.

    • @heatblast876
      @heatblast876 Рік тому

      @@Davis2920022001 if it was weaker than the F14 radar then how mig 31 able to look F22 at the medium range and able to launch the R37M missile toward it and the missile was tracking very well but it miss few meter from the F22. So it means that the mig 31 radar able to look the F22 on radar but not properly so don't you thing that Mig 31 PESA radar is more stronger and powerful than the Euro fighter typhoon which is AESA radar. Even that see the match between F22 VS 6 Eurofighter typhoon of BVR match and try to compared with the 1 Mig 31 vs F22 BVR match. You will know the result.

    • @michaelmunika5864
      @michaelmunika5864 Рік тому

      @@heatblast876 read what he wrote again.😂

  • @briandavis6137
    @briandavis6137 Рік тому +13

    I really like the back story on the aircraft before action begins, good job!

  • @Noisy_Cricket
    @Noisy_Cricket Рік тому +2

    "Uhhh, we're gonna pull up!" Good decision lol.

  • @09archange
    @09archange Рік тому +32

    This fight could have been more difficult if there was one more mig-31.

    • @MississippiKid96
      @MississippiKid96 Рік тому +9

      First off, I know everything in dcs is based off publicly available info, but I was honestly shocked that the foxhound was able to lock the f22 at all.. that was alot closer fight than many including myself would have anticipated

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 Рік тому +28

      @@MississippiKid96 The latest upgrade of the MiG-31 does have UPGRADED anti-stealth abilities.
      And even the ORIGINAL model from back in the 80s was later considered to be the first fighter with any real capability of "burning through" stealth.
      However, the -31 is also designed to exploit its datalink to the point where multiple -31s close enough to link or do it through a 3rd party relay, their sensors are made into an artifical array that basically allows it to function as a much bigger, stronger and more accurate radar.
      The effect is very good at partially ignoring stealth.

    • @divoulos5758
      @divoulos5758 Рік тому

      @@DIREWOLFx75 actually because it sees the target from multiple angles it cant really hide whatever hapens

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 Рік тому +3

      @@divoulos5758 No, while that HELPS a lot, but it does not reduce the effects of stealth as such.

    • @piscessoedroen
      @piscessoedroen Рік тому +1

      @@DIREWOLFx75 it definitely limits the ability to disappear into a notch significantly

  • @andrewrogers3067
    @andrewrogers3067 Рік тому +17

    The Mig-31 may be a God in BVR, but nothing beats the Raptor

    • @soberpanda4138
      @soberpanda4138 Рік тому +2

      Right it’s almost impossible to hit something you can’t see

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ Рік тому +3

      The only thing that would be even worse for the MiG-31 is the F-35 with Meteors or JATM's.
      Or a F-22, F-35 joint mission.

  • @pusheenthecat9264
    @pusheenthecat9264 Рік тому +6

    It would be really cool to see you fly the foxhound or the felon. You primarily play western aircraft, but it would be cool to see you fly Russian vehicles

  • @mattseller148
    @mattseller148 Рік тому +9

    The Axehead was not designed for fighter sized manuverable targets, is has great range and speed but it has a far lower max G load than most other air to air missile, for this reason it is not super hard to notch as seen in this video.

    • @n.w.1803
      @n.w.1803 Рік тому

      Did Axehead replace the AA-9 'Amos' on the MiG-31..?

    • @mattseller148
      @mattseller148 Рік тому +1

      Sort of. You never see a MIG-31 flying with AA-9 anymore but they still don’t have many R-37Ms

    • @mattseller148
      @mattseller148 Рік тому +1

      Correction, you don’t see MIG-31 flying combat missions with AA-9 anymore.

  • @etahhcumosevahi
    @etahhcumosevahi Рік тому +1

    The mig 31 is a legend. Keep in mind mig 31 is much older than the f22.

  • @AndrewShyne
    @AndrewShyne Рік тому +2

    love the new format! it is so cool to know a little history before the fight!

  • @rajaydon1893
    @rajaydon1893 Рік тому +2

    6:55 that's an oh shit moment right there

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 Рік тому +4

    Out of curiosity, it would be interesting to see a MiG-31 vs. a J-20 BVR fight.

  • @ShabbirAnsary
    @ShabbirAnsary Рік тому +5

    Would be interesting to see how F-22/35 would do against Meteor...

  • @isayed321
    @isayed321 Рік тому +9

    Would love to see the same fight but in a F-35. It would be nice if you could do more F-35 stuff (especially BVR).

  • @kevw25
    @kevw25 Рік тому +4

    Ooooo those were some spicy missle misses for sure!

  • @billymania11
    @billymania11 Рік тому +2

    LOL! After the first few days of combat, there would no MIG-31 aircraft left.

    • @SCH292
      @SCH292 Рік тому +2

      Hey. There wouldn't even be any MIG-31 in combat in the first place since Russia can't even maintain them. 😂

    • @adrianotaylor7230
      @adrianotaylor7230 Рік тому +1

      In the first few days all aircraft carriers will be sunk, all airbases will be destroyed, all satellites will be destroyed

  • @pranavroy8980
    @pranavroy8980 Рік тому +4

    Come on dude we want to see you in the Foxhound once

  • @UWfalcin
    @UWfalcin Рік тому

    9:00, what a fine lil' "BLOP!"

  • @gabriel-bl4ckh4wk-6
    @gabriel-bl4ckh4wk-6 Рік тому +1

    Those missiles were toooooooooooooooooooooo dam close OMFG, in especial, the last one! Awesome gameplay! It's insane how stealth the Raptor is! The missiles : I'm a joke to you?

  • @whalehands
    @whalehands Рік тому +6

    Prime example of what stealth does

  • @ЕвгенийАкулов-л8ж

    "Заслон" - Zaslon - The stress is placed on the last vowel.
    This word means backstop - Troops constituting a cover, defending the flanks, supporting the main operation with their actions, etc.

  • @FukaiRei27
    @FukaiRei27 Рік тому +2

    I heard the rumor that the way EA-18G gets simulation kill against F-22A is actually the maddog missile with D/L guidance from passive detection. Interesting

  • @GoRannization
    @GoRannization 9 місяців тому

    MIG 31 is one badass machine, even it's built in late 70s still one of the most advanced aircrafts today, threats to many, lol people even compare it to f22, truly ahead of it's time.

  • @thomasharden2727
    @thomasharden2727 Рік тому +1

    Yo those near misses were insane! And the fox3 with the sun in the background was dope!

  • @degarmo187
    @degarmo187 Рік тому

    Butt pucker moment at 14:50... dang that was super close.

  • @PhillipChalabi
    @PhillipChalabi Рік тому +6

    Now this would be a very interesting 2 vs 1, perhaps keep the F22 defensive long enough (even with the meh radar locks) to get close enough to die in a fox 2 fight? :D

  • @nathanielvega6312
    @nathanielvega6312 Рік тому

    i love it how he laughed when the mig-31 launched his first missle...😂

  • @ryanp5788
    @ryanp5788 Рік тому +17

    The F-22 was designed to kill mig-31s, the mig-31 wasn’t designed to kill F-22s

    • @fubaralakbar6800
      @fubaralakbar6800 Рік тому +1

      The F-22 was designed to shoot down God--the MiG-31 was designed to kill mortals.

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer Рік тому +1

      The F-22 was designed to kill Su-27’s.

  • @erikreddington461
    @erikreddington461 Рік тому +2

    Check this out, who wants to see 1)a dogfight at top of world, ceiling above 45000ft and 2) how ridiculous can a sr-71's dogfight be? Modded with weapons of course. Can GW get a gun kill with blackbird against a blackbird?

  • @javaace9746
    @javaace9746 Рік тому +1

    This was a blast! (Pardon the…) Anyway, I’m calling it now. We need GS vs the Tic Tac!

  • @LMYS5697
    @LMYS5697 Рік тому

    Epitome of a boom and zoom aircraft. If you get into a dogfight in a foxhound you've already lost.

  • @squirrelarmy9890
    @squirrelarmy9890 Рік тому +1

    in about 48 hours I get my flight equipment for DCS, can't wait.

  • @MyCatInABox
    @MyCatInABox Рік тому

    10:31
    Man- he was trying REAL HARD to shake it 😅 ...was throwing everything he had at it but the kitchen sink.
    He gets an "A" for the effort.

  • @benwatso
    @benwatso Рік тому +6

    F-22 videos make my day better.

  • @mevseverybody2439
    @mevseverybody2439 Рік тому +1

    No way R37 it's not a joke bro,.that's a hypersonic missile you can't even see that coming 😄

  • @manofchaitea6904
    @manofchaitea6904 Рік тому +4

    American missiles are a huge limiting factor to air domination at very long ranges.

  • @SarcastSempervirens
    @SarcastSempervirens Рік тому +1

    The radar is "zaslon", in Croatian it would simply mean "screen", usually used for a "computer screen". I believe it's of a similar meaning in russian, no clue.

  • @ALEX86ZILBER
    @ALEX86ZILBER Рік тому +1

    Please make MORE BVR missions vs/or flying the mighty MIG 31. It's all over the media while this aircraft carries the KINZHAL hypersonic missile

  • @longtimber
    @longtimber Рік тому

    Sphincter factor five on that missile that went under. Major pucker.

  • @linasdrauksas5419
    @linasdrauksas5419 Рік тому

    0:14 cabin glass sealed with the putty...... top notch technology from ruzzia

  • @Sup3r6f0ur
    @Sup3r6f0ur Рік тому +4

    I'd kinda like to see how a C or EX eagle Super Hornet, Viper, and Typhoon would do. Seems like they would be in for quite a rough fight if the F22 is having a "tough time."

    • @mikegreck2625
      @mikegreck2625 Рік тому +2

      hornet isnt even in the same league as the rest of the aircraft mentioned lol

  • @namelesscrow9351
    @namelesscrow9351 Рік тому

    I love the lil blurb at the start of the vid, makes me feel like I'm right in the chair with you😎💪

  • @WinVisten
    @WinVisten Рік тому

    13:24 I guess the missile *doesn't* know where it is THIS time.

  • @Hawqer
    @Hawqer Рік тому

    DCS' Scenery looks like one of those imac wallpapers.

  • @johnkruton9708
    @johnkruton9708 Рік тому

    14:42 HOLY FRAAAKKKK!!! Yeah that missle saw you and said “HOL UP!!!”…..dang man that was a butt pucker ‘fer sure….! Having watched your “death compilation shorts” it is really a good thing this is a simulation.!!! 😅

  • @RA-dd5mg
    @RA-dd5mg Рік тому

    I dig the snippet of documentary there before the flight nice touch

  • @MarksamtheMarksman_Official
    @MarksamtheMarksman_Official Рік тому +1

    I've been waiting months for this. Let's goooo!

  • @Kolaotse
    @Kolaotse Рік тому +3

    would be interesting to see this from the migs perspective

  • @carltanner9065
    @carltanner9065 Рік тому

    Poor old Bill shouldn't have pulled into the driveway when he did. We're gonna miss him!!😛😛

  • @DeltaAvgeekOfficial
    @DeltaAvgeekOfficial Рік тому +2

    I've been waiting for this! Thanks Growling

  • @ainu1981
    @ainu1981 Рік тому

    Literally something I was googling the other day out of curiosity. Interesting watch!

  • @Ryak84
    @Ryak84 Рік тому +12

    Keep in mind that the sensor and jamming modeling in DCS is basic at best. You would be suprised how effective modern jamming equipment is against even the latest SAM systems... not to mention how effective the low observability of the F22 really is.

    • @RazorsharpLT
      @RazorsharpLT Рік тому

      True. Russians are very keen on overestimating their capabilities
      Meanwhile the US is keen on underestimating them, knowing the Russians will do the minimal amount of work possible lmao

  • @hamidselectronics4863
    @hamidselectronics4863 Рік тому

    At last, GS took the revenge of being smoked in Mig-31 vs F-14 and F-16s' videos.

  • @stinkyfungus
    @stinkyfungus Рік тому +1

    Methinks the modders that made some of this russian hardware actually believe 100% what the brochure says in cyrillic...

  • @baileymartin2092
    @baileymartin2092 18 днів тому

    Love the plane descriptions and possible specs

  • @veritasardens6547
    @veritasardens6547 Рік тому +1

    Nice to know that the F-22 can kick the Mig-31's rear.

  • @ivan1kot
    @ivan1kot Рік тому +10

    Thank you GS for amazing content and special thanks for historical part
    Hope all military battles will be only in DCS or simulators like that one day 🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺

  • @wallacegrommet9343
    @wallacegrommet9343 Рік тому +5

    These high altitude MiGs were used effectively by loitering at a sufficient distance and altitude to be essentially undetectable.

  • @michaelc2423
    @michaelc2423 Рік тому

    Good Fight! That near miss was fantastic, I nearly choked laughing.👏👏👏

  • @MyCatInABox
    @MyCatInABox Рік тому

    8:19
    😳
    😄...good Lord

  • @rebelliousfew
    @rebelliousfew Рік тому

    Honestly, the MIG-31 Is probably the deadliest interceptor/stand-off fighter In the world. Put an AWACS In a safe area and lob off R-37M’s at whatever target Is there and let data link track the target, and you have a real threat on your hands. One thing I’ve learned, Is you can’t write off the Russians on everything.

  • @idkisaidit
    @idkisaidit Рік тому

    Love these vids - we need a playlist of all your best/most dramatic dogfights

  • @d4ll4sdr4gon2
    @d4ll4sdr4gon2 7 місяців тому

    Oh..I see said the Blind Man... LOVE IT!!

  • @TheGlider40
    @TheGlider40 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for all your research work on all these aircraft you profile, makes your channel that much better, just awesome brother👍

  • @2mfabian
    @2mfabian Рік тому +4

    Man, that was strange! How come an old radar like the one from the MIG 31 can give so much headache to a stealth fighter? And the MIG 31 had a huge RCS, how come the F22 cannot find it at longer distances?

    • @arnavsadhu
      @arnavsadhu Рік тому +3

      Same way the r37's seekers aren't able to track a stealth f22 even in visual ranges.

    • @Brody961
      @Brody961 Рік тому +17

      A big part of it **could* be attributed to the limitations of DCS and a lot of the specifics for the factors that play into that are still highly classified on both the Russian and American side. Examples being the real world capabilites of the Mig31s radar vs whats in DCS, the real world capabilities of the F22s radar AND electronic warfare vs whats in DCS, and the real world capabilities of stealth and missles vs whats in DCS. Its a great sim but those models are highly simplified and would be impossible to get that real world data for

    • @ivand5699
      @ivand5699 Рік тому +4

      The thing is that the MiG 31 radar is huge, think about it like an interceptor with an awacs in the nose lol.

    • @claudiovic9883
      @claudiovic9883 Рік тому +1

      @@ivand5699 the radar being bigger doesnt mean it can lock easily in stealth, and when you try to lock a target with a tiny rcs like an f-22, the max distance to lock will drop very much

    • @PandaMan-xy1he
      @PandaMan-xy1he Рік тому +3

      Size. MiG-31BM carries one of the most modern radar systems Russia has yet built, combined with being the largest radar ever put on a fighter. In the other direction, F-22 should see it; I'm not sure what's up with that. Really, 31BM has the best chance a RedFor aircraft has of seeing F-22, with Felon's radar coming up second simply due to size.

  • @avirajdastidar7691
    @avirajdastidar7691 Рік тому

    "Hold my AMRAAM" Truly unstoppable

  • @LighthouseProductions1
    @LighthouseProductions1 Рік тому

    If a mig 25 and a mig 31 were to dogfight eachother that would be insane

  • @bigqueef7352
    @bigqueef7352 Рік тому

    Two of my favorite planes of all time up against each other. Awesome :)

  • @truthseeker9454
    @truthseeker9454 Рік тому +1

    00:09 - 00:13 - Don't miss the liberal use of putty around the cockpit canopy -- classic Soviet era high tech engineering and manufacturing precision. 😆

  • @weaponeer
    @weaponeer Рік тому +1

    I would like to hear the other pilot and you talk about the engagement

  • @WakeMarine
    @WakeMarine Рік тому

    A MSgt I knew from 513 "Flying Nightmares" acquired the Iraqi flag from the tail off of a Foxbat that was buried. It was an amazing chunk of cast steel.

  • @52down
    @52down Рік тому +1

    It's pretty surprising that Foxhound could pick you from such far distance

  • @hawkeye2816
    @hawkeye2816 Рік тому +14

    I would wonder if the 31 could actually see an F-22. That radar was already in service by the time F-22 was being developed, and US intelligence probably had its operating frequencies. Given it's one of the premier air-to-air radars in Soviet/Russian service, surely they tested and optimized the F-22 stealth capabilities against it.

    • @Ba5edAF
      @Ba5edAF Рік тому +1

      Sure

    • @theamericancommie727
      @theamericancommie727 Рік тому +8

      Well it’s been upgraded, to be honest the radar worked fine, in the first round something compromised the stealth, I have no idea what, the second round the stealth worked fine, and he was detected at 35ish miles or so like I’d expect. The raptors stealth is more old fashioned

    • @theamericancommie727
      @theamericancommie727 Рік тому +4

      Btw for those wondering what I mean by the raptors stealth is old fashioned is that it’s not exactly optimized for L band and S band radar, or even really strong PESA radar, PESA radar usually isn’t too strong but the MiG-31s radar is gigantic providing power, actually it’s this reason why aircraft usually don’t carry L band and S band radars to detect stealth, their extremely poor in accuracy and locking, you would need a really big Sam system to do it and the S-400 is not up for that job. It’s why the F-35 fares better against s-400s as it flew over s-400s in Syria undetected due to its more modern and optimized stealth for newer radars, although a mig-21 for example, a Raptor would be stealthier due to lower rcs. Stealth takes pilot skill to use though, of course you don’t let the other guy point his radar on you, you’d usually flank so he doesn’t know where in the sky to look for you, and you actively have to go away from where their radar is looking. I think that’s something people forget, stealth actually takes pilot skill and is so much more than just numbers.

    • @mattseller148
      @mattseller148 Рік тому +2

      @@theamericancommie727 Great comment. People always forget that the reason American stealth jets are so effective is not just because of the advanced tech but rather the skill of the pilots who can use it to it's maximum ability.

    • @theamericancommie727
      @theamericancommie727 Рік тому +1

      @@mattseller148 that and we have the most networked army, not just airforce, but military. Russia lacks this to a degree but I appreciate their attempt at it, the su-57 offers datalink and IFF networking. China has great networking.

  • @camjam344
    @camjam344 Рік тому +1

    Mig 21 vs mig 31 dogfight for the bois

  • @baab4229
    @baab4229 Рік тому +12

    Being able to break lock is actually so much more useful than just being invisible. Stealth not only reduces the enemy's engagement range but can also make them waste missiles at targets they can't track. No wonder America spent hundreds of billions on stealth technology.

    • @icecold9511
      @icecold9511 Рік тому +4

      In advanced tactical fighters, I'd open a bay door to tease them into firing, then close it and break the lock.

    • @diesirae8954
      @diesirae8954 Рік тому

      @@icecold9511 Beware of the Serb with the 1960s SAM. 😨

    • @icecold9511
      @icecold9511 Рік тому +2

      @@diesirae8954
      FYI, apparently that 117 had a jammed bay door.

    • @theamericancommie727
      @theamericancommie727 Рік тому +4

      @@icecold9511 that is literally the biggest troll ever

    • @bean108
      @bean108 Рік тому +4

      @@theamericancommie727 No, he'd being legit. The F-117 that the Serbs crow about shooting down actually had its bay door open when it got locked onto. That wasn't the only reason it was shot down, but it didn't help the 117's chances either.