That smart extrude is something I've been wanting in maya for yearssss. In the days of Google sketchup this was the standard (albeit not as topologically smart) and always missed having such basic and useful feature.
Maya is starts to improve on the field of modelling it is closing up the gap to Houdini and its nearly there. (unfortunately the Maya indie license is still 2× as expensive as Houdini indie)
@@4536647674 Idk, this was a pretty nice update, and the one thing about maya is it builds on top of features. Blender will completely nuke a substantial part of the program, and you will be forced to relearn it.
Yo that smart extrude is crazy. As well as the bevel boolean. I work in airforce virtual reality creation as a modeler and theres sooo many ridiculous aircraft parts that look insane and require booleans or quad drawing off of a 3d scan.
Pretty sweet lineup this year, you just love to see it. If it's stable enough, it may even get me to upgrade from Maya 2022. I guess we'll see. I've had a lot of issues with 2023 and 2024. Smart extrude is one of those features that should have been in Maya a very long time ago, and as someone who's still relatively new to 3D modelling, that's exactly how I would expect it to work, but quickly learnt that it doesn't.
are you able to make animations using nCloth or using dynamics with maya 2025? i can't. maya only renders the first frame for the whole sequence. im using arnold. Any advice? i called autodesk and they haven't figured it out either. :( so frustrating.
Looking very handy :) Cannot wait to try the smart extrude (that's been such a pain...) Bevels... I don't know... I like to have full control of bevels, but for some less important assets it will speed up the process.
@@jlmussi but can export to polygons at any resolution and with working topology that can be tweaked in poly modelling. But if all quad topology is your love then you should stay away from it. I don't know why people always want quad even if it is not meant for deformation and destruction physics.
@@MartyRxMurdeRz the reply is necessary because for hard surface, i think the whole industry is wasting its time on its primitive thinking "All quads" that is not true as per current technology because at the end only final shading of the model matters which works for 90% times when you are not going for deformation/physics on it, for that you can always retoplogise your model either automatic or manual and that will give you better control over your previously built toplogy while struggling for all quads as you have a complete shape on which you can retopologise easily with control over your edgeflow. Even the greatest master of 3ds max (Arrimus3d) hybrid his workflow to max+plasticity so why i shouldn't tell this to everyone. just see his youtube channel and you will know the mastery he get in HardSurface.
@@Ruben3D Why do you waste your time to make points about Blender when this is a video about Maya. Why don't you go watch content about blender instead of berating people about a program no one asked about.
you used weird sound effects in your video, like in 1:13, which made me stand up and check the door or to see if something has fell down or my room is haunted or something.
viewport - 10 years old, any improvements. shader graph editor - 20 years old, any improvements. ui - still very bugy and the same for 10 years. UV - RizomUV soo much better. smart extrude should be introduced 5 years ago, nowdays every program have it. very very bad autodesk, as always
@@MrAsag indie is cheap shader graph - you have lookdevX now UVs - besides Rizom compared to all other dccs it's the best Viewport what do you want exactly? they did lots of stuff on the viewport for performance which is the most important
Still dont understand why people complaining maya UV tool. Bruh look at blender. It barely doing somethinh efficient. I'd say blender has the most retard uv tool of all 3d software. Yet my suggestion to UV tool since 2.8 update got downvotes and never came true.
Si estas son las grandes actualizaciones para la próxima versión, es hora de abandonar el barco, no tiene sentido, son operadores sencillos y regulares para los usuarios de Blender, algunos desde hace mas de 1 década. ¿Extrude edges?, ¿Extrude manifold?, Bevel by angles, Sharp o attributos, son opciones qué en Blender se dan por sentadas desde hace años.
Esa herramienta es una copia de Sketchup el extrude manifold de Blender aunque salio primero que el de Max y Maya aun tiene errores que no han sido resueltos
Blender isn't Heavy duty, it can't perform a Gargantuan amount of heavy load of over the top movie vfx. Maya had to make sure that everything will run smoothly in the worst case scenario, therefore everything is much more optimized for heavy duty. while Blender don't give a F about that, everything is implemented faster but sloppy and can easily crumble under heavy load once you work on over the top maxed out stuff, blender is useless, and you'll appreciate Maya more and more.
@@jensenraylight8011 Bullshit. I'm doing heavyload stuff in Blender, while Maya crashes all the time, and have to keep resetting my Configs. Expensive shit.
@@MartyRxMurdeRzas a former Blender user who just switched to Maya. No, absolutely not. Maya is superior in almost everything besides geometry nodes and sculpting
I have been using Blender as a modeler for the last four years, and I can tell that there are a lot of stuff that need improved. Unfortunately development of polymodeling in Blender is pretty much dead, at least for the last couple years.
@@andrewsmith4575 not true, test the new arnold gpu it's pretty much on pair with redshift now in rendering speed. Quite impressive actually, and much better result in term of lighting and accuracy. No more redshift for me now.
Another year - Another Maya update that not worthy a major version release. Autodesk’s “updates” of Maya are ludicrous. It’s Maya 2018.14 in real world
Having used Maya and Blender for a few years, I can just say that Maya sucks. It's funny how they are struggling to get up to date when they didn't put any effor a few years ago before blender 2.8.
Having used Maya and Blender for many years I would say that Blender is awesome and I love it, but I'd choose to work in Maya any day. I can get stuff done way faster in Maya. Use whatever works best for you.
@@andrewsmith4575 oh I'm surprised! I think you are the first person in my experience who prefers Maya lol For me once I was comfortable with Blender, using Maya at work felt like a chore 🫠
Why do you feel the need to make comparisons, if you like blender great no one cares. No one asked if you think Maya sucks and your comment is not constructive in any way just anecdotal berating so you feel validated in your decision to use Blender.
@@MartyRxMurdeRz Nobody asked you to comment here either and here you are, we are all free to comment in youtube. No one cares about your opinion either.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
That smart extrude is something I've been wanting in maya for yearssss. In the days of Google sketchup this was the standard (albeit not as topologically smart) and always missed having such basic and useful feature.
Yeah I used to use fusion 360 for cad and it worked like that , glad its gonna be hete
That bevel Boolean intersection will be game changing
Solid set of additions. Smart extrude and bevel filtering look particularly useful.
Oh man those are actually some really nice modeling updates
Solid line up this year.
Bevel by angle and Hard and soft edges. Finallyyy
Yup, that's my favorite update!
Maya is starts to improve on the field of modelling it is closing up the gap to Houdini and its nearly there. (unfortunately the Maya indie license is still 2× as expensive as Houdini indie)
awesome fast update thank you! Mine was probably the smart extrude because it now can act similar to Inventor or FreeCAD extrude/pad workflows.
We're not even 1/4th way into 2024. And maya is already in 2025...
I'm pretty sure that's just the standard release cycle.
😂
The year version is increasing but the performance is going backwards..but maya is still the best though despite their shit
@@4536647674 Idk, this was a pretty nice update, and the one thing about maya is it builds on top of features. Blender will completely nuke a substantial part of the program, and you will be forced to relearn it.
@@UtterUnit Their release schedule has been like this for a long time.
Getting closer and closer to CAD baby !!!😁
Not of course
Cool T-shirt JL! 😁Love it!
Yo that smart extrude is crazy. As well as the bevel boolean. I work in airforce virtual reality creation as a modeler and theres sooo many ridiculous aircraft parts that look insane and require booleans or quad drawing off of a 3d scan.
Tnx for the info. If possible , please make a step by step tutorial of the hand which you used in this video
I switched from Blender to Maya today and won’t look back.
"Today's sponsor...Me" ngl is pretty tough
still no grid fill
Pretty sweet lineup this year, you just love to see it. If it's stable enough, it may even get me to upgrade from Maya 2022. I guess we'll see. I've had a lot of issues with 2023 and 2024.
Smart extrude is one of those features that should have been in Maya a very long time ago, and as someone who's still relatively new to 3D modelling, that's exactly how I would expect it to work, but quickly learnt that it doesn't.
Dynamic Boolean + Bevel is a dream come true.
Any chance we can get a course on making that bicycle from your Hard surface masterclass?
New Bevel Tool will be a game changer!
It would be awesome if you make a step by step tutorial of this hand
are you able to make animations using nCloth or using dynamics with maya 2025? i can't. maya only renders the first frame for the whole sequence. im using arnold. Any advice? i called autodesk and they haven't figured it out either. :( so frustrating.
when Maya have physic AI animation as Cascadeur
is the update available for download on autodesk access?
Smart Extrude is wonderful! It saves us a lot of time...
The new extrude system is lit
Hey, what happened to your hard surface modeling course?
Looking very handy :) Cannot wait to try the smart extrude (that's been such a pain...) Bevels... I don't know... I like to have full control of bevels, but for some less important assets it will speed up the process.
Handy...I see what you did there. 🤣
maya 2025? what!!! / amazing
Plasticity is best for hard surface modelling. It is completely a new way of working Polygon and Nurbs together.
Plasticity doesn't use polygons.
@@jlmussi but can export to polygons at any resolution and with working topology that can be tweaked in poly modelling. But if all quad topology is your love then you should stay away from it. I don't know why people always want quad even if it is not meant for deformation and destruction physics.
@@kalpit3d934Do you feel special bringing up software that is not related to the video. No one asked about Plasticity.
@@MartyRxMurdeRz the reply is necessary because for hard surface, i think the whole industry is wasting its time on its primitive thinking "All quads" that is not true as per current technology because at the end only final shading of the model matters which works for 90% times when you are not going for deformation/physics on it, for that you can always retoplogise your model either automatic or manual and that will give you better control over your previously built toplogy while struggling for all quads as you have a complete shape on which you can retopologise easily with control over your edgeflow.
Even the greatest master of 3ds max (Arrimus3d) hybrid his workflow to max+plasticity so why i shouldn't tell this to everyone. just see his youtube channel and you will know the mastery he get in HardSurface.
I love how you say Boolean like Boulion. It makes me want soup! Good video.
I have alot of issues with crashes, but they mostly happen when I am UV mapping. Is there any way to avoid this?
delete history before doing your uv's
I love smart extrude, but why couldn't they have made a way to set it as shift+drag.
That's already the shortcut for move extrude.
only if they would bring 3ds max modifier stack
I just have one question: Will it blend?
Stop being a amateur
No thanks!
Maya needs a sculpt mode. Maybe mudbox inside
Maya does have a sculpt mode that is really underrated. It could be improved, but it's helped me out at reducing pinching on bad topology.
@@UtterUnit It are tools for mesh. With this tools are impossible to sculpt anything from scratch.
Maya's sculpt tools are decent. They aren't ZBrush but they're useable for small jobs.
@@andrewsmith4575 Blender has better sculpt than Maya and it is free . Maya doesn't have sculpt mode only tools for retouch meshes.
@@Ruben3D Why do you waste your time to make points about Blender when this is a video about Maya. Why don't you go watch content about blender instead of berating people about a program no one asked about.
you used weird sound effects in your video, like in 1:13, which made me stand up and check the door or to see if something has fell down or my room is haunted or something.
Smart extrude is awesome, like in 3ds max
Can u please make a video on getting high paying clients , dude
I am so hardly waiting for your 3d masterclass, when are you planning to do it ?? 😢
Cypress Hill!
Is it just me or the renaming tool is not working properly since maya 2025 dropped?
Well, finally, at least something sensible for modellers. Otherwise, there are always some updates only for animators.
This was a great update for 3d modelers.
Wow bevel by Boolean 😮
This one will come in handy.
Nnnnnice!
Just dropped my Maya license for Blender. It's pretty rad.
I swear blender users are like vegans at a bbq party... just dont click on the video bot, it's not that hard
batter you have to share maya 2025 cracked version installation tutorial first.
How many Blender Gangs watching this👇
Well ❤
bevel Boolean
viewport - 10 years old, any improvements.
shader graph editor - 20 years old, any improvements.
ui - still very bugy and the same for 10 years.
UV - RizomUV soo much better.
smart extrude should be introduced 5 years ago, nowdays every program have it.
very very bad autodesk, as always
Do you realize what you just said, you basically said Maya is 20 years ahead of everyone, that's why updates often have so little new content...
Rizon uv is pricey, yes better, but pricey... And go make uvs on blender 👉 that's very good
@@joaoguilhermenextlevel302 maya is not the cheap tool too. So everyone expected from autodesk something useful.
not just the dust to eyes
@@MrAsag indie is cheap
shader graph - you have lookdevX now
UVs - besides Rizom compared to all other dccs it's the best
Viewport what do you want exactly? they did lots of stuff on the viewport for performance which is the most important
Still dont understand why people complaining maya UV tool. Bruh look at blender. It barely doing somethinh efficient. I'd say blender has the most retard uv tool of all 3d software. Yet my suggestion to UV tool since 2.8 update got downvotes and never came true.
Si estas son las grandes actualizaciones para la próxima versión, es hora de abandonar el barco,
no tiene sentido, son operadores sencillos y regulares para los usuarios de Blender, algunos desde hace mas de 1 década. ¿Extrude edges?, ¿Extrude manifold?, Bevel by angles, Sharp o attributos, son opciones qué en Blender se dan por sentadas desde hace años.
Esa herramienta es una copia de Sketchup el extrude manifold de Blender aunque salio primero que el de Max y Maya aun tiene errores que no han sido resueltos
That's it!!?! :(
What did I think?
All useless things until we can get PLE versions of the software again.
plasticity smokes maya in modeling
Isn't plasticity a CAD modeler and not a poly modeler?
@@CorpoWolf that’s the point. U can model polys with nurbs tools. So cool
❣️ Promo'SM
maya already in 2025 meanwhile blender had these features atleast 5 years ago
Do you just sit around and wait for Maya videos to come up so you can post about Blender?
Blender isn't Heavy duty, it can't perform a Gargantuan amount of heavy load of over the top movie vfx.
Maya had to make sure that everything will run smoothly in the worst case scenario,
therefore everything is much more optimized for heavy duty.
while Blender don't give a F about that, everything is implemented faster but sloppy
and can easily crumble under heavy load
once you work on over the top maxed out stuff, blender is useless, and you'll appreciate Maya more and more.
@@jensenraylight8011 Bullshit. I'm doing heavyload stuff in Blender, while Maya crashes all the time, and have to keep resetting my Configs. Expensive shit.
@@MartyRxMurdeRz yeah
@@MartyRxMurdeRzas a former Blender user who just switched to Maya. No, absolutely not. Maya is superior in almost everything besides geometry nodes and sculpting
Maya’s living in 2005
Blender an a couple 20$ add-ons puts Maya to shame..lmao
Maya : We have new features for faster 3d modelling, now.
Meanwhile Blender : You guys still haven't finished your modelling stuff?
I have been using Blender as a modeler for the last four years, and I can tell that there are a lot of stuff that need improved. Unfortunately development of polymodeling in Blender is pretty much dead, at least for the last couple years.
Maya is superior in modeling
Blender users: “wait, y’all have to wait for updates?”
tee-shirt of a real nerd cringe
No built-in good GPU renderer!
What? Are you blind? Arnold GPU is great
@@lasereye159 Slow as your mum though 😛
@@lasereye159Arnold Gpu Rendering is a 🐌
Switching to Redshift makes rendering so much nicer
@@andrewsmith4575 not true, test the new arnold gpu it's pretty much on pair with redshift now in rendering speed. Quite impressive actually, and much better result in term of lighting and accuracy. No more redshift for me now.
Another year - Another Maya update that not worthy a major version release. Autodesk’s “updates” of Maya are ludicrous. It’s Maya 2018.14 in real world
Blender.
Yup
Having used Maya and Blender for a few years, I can just say that Maya sucks. It's funny how they are struggling to get up to date when they didn't put any effor a few years ago before blender 2.8.
Having used Maya and Blender for many years I would say that Blender is awesome and I love it, but I'd choose to work in Maya any day. I can get stuff done way faster in Maya. Use whatever works best for you.
@@andrewsmith4575 oh I'm surprised! I think you are the first person in my experience who prefers Maya lol For me once I was comfortable with Blender, using Maya at work felt like a chore 🫠
Why do you feel the need to make comparisons, if you like blender great no one cares. No one asked if you think Maya sucks and your comment is not constructive in any way just anecdotal berating so you feel validated in your decision to use Blender.
@@MartyRxMurdeRz Nobody asked you to comment here either and here you are, we are all free to comment in youtube. No one cares about your opinion either.
Show us what you use to do in Maya, and/or blender, show us topology ! We've seen comments like this on every Maya video 😂
Blender > Maya 2025 still.
Autodesk is a disgrace of 3D art
Boi sit down