This Sony WIDE lens is BETTER… and CHEAPER

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2024
  • The first 1,000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare:
    skl.sh/chrisbrockhurst04221
    In this video I show why the Sony 16-35 F4 G Lens is better and cheaper than the old 16-35 F4. There is lots lots of example test video to watch and some comparisons too.
    Sony 16-35 PZ - geni.us/sony1635g
    My Skillshare Wedding Class - geni.us/weddingclass
    LUTs I use to grade - geni.us/phantomluts (get 15% OFF with code 'Chris'
    30 Days FREE music for YOUR Videos: geni.us/epidemiclink
    Download my A7IV Settings - geni.us/A7IVsettings
    Book a Coaching Session - geni.us/coachingwithcb
    0:00 - Intro
    1:06 - Initial Impressions
    1:55 -OSS footage comparison
    3:28 - Balancing on a Gimbal
    4:09 - Zooming using the FX3
    5:14 - New style of shots
    5:47 - Power Zoom speed control
    6:03 - Autofocus Capability
    6:20 - Focus Breathing
    6:31 - Where I use this lens
    6:45 - Is the old lens useless?
    7:12 - Outro
    GEAR I’M USING IN 2022 (Amazon affiliate links)
    CAMERAS
    Vid Camera - geni.us/sonya7siii
    B Camera - geni.us/S-FX3
    Stills and C Camera - Sony A7IV - geni.us/A7iv
    Old Full Frame Cam (still good!!) - geni.us/SonyA7iiiCB1
    Cheap APSC Cam - geni.us/sonya6100cb
    Drone - geni.us/mavicair2cb
    Best BTS Cam - geni.us/Insta36amz
    BEST BUDGET LENSES
    50mm - geni.us/sony50mmF18cb
    24mm F1.8 - geni.us/viltrox24mm
    85mm F1.8 II - geni.us/viltrox85mm
    (all in one -) Sigma 24-70 - geni.us/sigma2470
    LENSES I USE
    Best All round lens - geni.us/sigma2470
    Real Estate Lens - geni.us/Sony1635F4CB
    FAV Lens EVER - geni.us/Sony24mmF14CB
    The BOKEH lens - geni.us/50mmf12
    Close up lens - geni.us/sony90mmmacro
    B Roll Beast Lens - geni.us/Sony85mmF18CB
    Sharpest Lens - geni.us/Sony55mmF18CB
    Zoomy Sniper Lens - geni.us/sony70200f4cb
    CAMERA ACCESSORIES I USE
    Ninja V - geni.us/ninjavcb
    FAV Portable Light - geni.us/p1vloggercb
    A7iii EyeCup - geni.us/Eyecup
    A7iii Grip/L Bracket - geni.us/a7iiilbracket
    MICS I USE
    Vlog Mic - geni.us/rodevideomicrocb
    Podcast/UA-cam Mic - geni.us/sm7cb
    Camera Mic - geni.us/smic2cb
    BAGS
    HUGE Backpack - geni.us/lowepro450awCB
    Travel Bag - geni.us/peakdesign20l
    LIGHTING
    Main Studio Light - geni.us/aputure120dcb
    Studio light Dome - geni.us/lightdomecb
    Budget Light - geni.us/godoxsl60
    Budget light Dome - geni.us/neewerlightdomecb
    Battery powered Light - geni.us/aputure60xcb
    Spotlight Zoom (for pattern on wall) - geni.us/spotlightminizoom
    All gear I use: geni.us/amazoncb
    Wedding Gear I use on Kit: kit.co/chrisbrockhurst
    #sonya7siii #sonyfx3
    FOLLOW ME
    Instagram: / chrisbrockhurst
    Twitter: / chrisbrockhurs
    AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
    Some of the links used in the description will direct you to Amazon, as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
    SPONSORSHIP/COLLABS
    For collaborations, sponsorships and business enquiries email us here: Chris@craterr.com
    If you have a question or want to chat, use the Instagram or Twitter links above, thanks! chris brockhurst

КОМЕНТАРІ • 151

  • @quirkworks4076
    @quirkworks4076 Рік тому +5

    This lens is next on the list. And Chris, seriously, your videos are just stellar. Engaging, informative, and not a second wasted.

  • @helencogan2187
    @helencogan2187 2 роки тому

    GREAT review.. I am on the wait list for this lens... can't wait!!! Thank you...

  • @WilliamAbbate
    @WilliamAbbate 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant idea to use the commercial to show the difference in the two lens! I tried to skip it and had to go back and watch it once I realized what was going on. Very slick! BTW, you sold me on the lens!!!!

  • @tarylljackson
    @tarylljackson 2 роки тому +4

    Been wanting a 16-35mm. Was so happy when I first heard about this lens…I’m sold. 🤔 Still on the fence with which gimbal to get, but after seeing this, the M3, FX3 and 16-35mm combo seems like a very nice compact way to go. Great video as always. Thank you!! 🙏🏽😎👍🏽

  • @Josh_Sattin
    @Josh_Sattin 2 роки тому +1

    Great review Chris! Footage looks great too!

  • @GeoSphere
    @GeoSphere 2 роки тому

    Great video! I watch a ton of UA-cam videos about videography/film making and I don’t think I’ve come across your channel before. Loved this one [video] as I am a Sony user (a6400). I’d love a G master lens, but not in my budget.
    Anyway, I love your video production quality, transitions and feel. You have great energy and humor. you’ve got a new subscriber in me, and I’ll be taking some cues from your productions to help improve and continue my growth as a creator.
    Thanks!!

  • @cesarangeles1699
    @cesarangeles1699 2 роки тому +2

    Pre-ordered this lens bcos I love this focal length but hate the size of the GM on my a7C. The zoom is only thing I’m not sure how I’ll feel about. Great video comparison and true talk.

  • @JohnDennery
    @JohnDennery 2 роки тому +10

    All of the upgrades on this are excellent and I especially love that the mfd is shorter at the long end! I hope they update the 24-105 in a similar way. Currently just rocking the 20mm 1.8 instead of this but the 16-35 sure looks handy

    • @MollyFitzBrown
      @MollyFitzBrown 2 роки тому

      I am using that 20mm too, think I'm going to swap it out for this, love having the focal range options...

    • @NetvoTV
      @NetvoTV 10 місяців тому

      How about 20-70mm F4?

  • @floriangladis
    @floriangladis 2 роки тому +1

    Literally followed your advice at the end to subscribe. I am now subscribed. Your content is very helpful, thank you! :)

  • @BrandonShi
    @BrandonShi 2 роки тому

    Hey Chris! Great video! Looking to have this exact setup! (FX3 +16-35 + Crane m3)
    How are you attaching the FX3 On the M3??
    Are you using a special adapter/etc? Thank you so much!

  • @thomaswilliams7601
    @thomaswilliams7601 Рік тому

    Accellent video,sharp snappy production,great script just the right amount of humour no bs,loved it and .........it told me what I needed to know.
    That's what a video should be
    Player to player shrimp to pimp

  • @LuisMarquez80
    @LuisMarquez80 2 роки тому

    Your content just keeps getting better

  • @AnkitPathakPhotography
    @AnkitPathakPhotography 2 роки тому

    Loved ur informative video plz make detail video for third party lenses for sony for wide and prime lenses

  • @youtubeaishaskitchen
    @youtubeaishaskitchen Рік тому +2

    hy nice content, i really want to know if a f4 does the job not so good like a f2.8? do you really need a lot of light for a f4? thx for answering

  • @PeteBreen
    @PeteBreen 2 роки тому +1

    Looking forward to the Skillshare class. Used your promo link last month and have really enjoyed it.

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      Great to here Pete! I actually just completed it and the link is in the description 👍🏻

  • @DarkPa1adin
    @DarkPa1adin 2 роки тому

    how’s the maximum magnification? and the closest focus distance? :) is it suitable for "macro" b-roll product shot?

  • @happy030
    @happy030 2 роки тому

    Hi CHris, I´ve already preorder mine. I want also buy a remote control (with for the zooming) - which one is it, you´re talking about @5:20 ? where can I buy it?

  • @thetravelingbubby
    @thetravelingbubby 2 роки тому +1

    "you can fight me on that" lol such a great video

  • @VictorLaforteza
    @VictorLaforteza 2 роки тому

    Ahhhh!! I can't wait to get this lens when it comes out.

  • @idpbaguslaksana7018
    @idpbaguslaksana7018 2 роки тому +1

    Sony APSC 10-18mm F4 vs Sony FE 16-35mm G F4, which one you choose for FF camera?

  • @bayouboy8644
    @bayouboy8644 8 місяців тому

    How does this compare to the 16-35 2.8. in your opinion Thank you.

  • @Whaever_1981
    @Whaever_1981 2 роки тому

    Will the M3 also handle the load of the A7SIII instead of the FX3? And are you saying it can't control the zoom function from the M3 itself if you don't use the FX3? So it would not work with the A7SIII? Thx for the great vid!

  • @alexpittsley
    @alexpittsley Рік тому

    is the f/4 a deal breaker? looking to upgrade my kit 28-70mm from sony for videos and vlogs

  • @TomLally
    @TomLally 2 роки тому

    If I could get the 2.8 for around the same price as the 4.0 which one will still be better? Much appreciated.

  • @WobbleMatic
    @WobbleMatic 2 роки тому

    Great video, thanks for that.

  • @cborel83
    @cborel83 2 роки тому

    so you can control the zoom with the gimbal? and the crane?

  • @RandomMotoThings
    @RandomMotoThings 2 роки тому

    How are you grading these clips in this video?

  • @DjimmyTrovy
    @DjimmyTrovy 2 роки тому +4

    4:44 this is art.

  • @NetvoTV
    @NetvoTV 10 місяців тому +1

    If I get A7RV as my first camera with 70-200mm F4 macro G ii and just use standard Yellow iPhone 15 to shoot closer things with its 13mm, 26mm and 52mm, is it good setup if I'm just hobbyist with good understanding of photography and compositions who want to enjoy shooting and use for personal products shots too? I choose Sony over other brands because they have the lens with unique feature I want like super tele with macro ability that I mentioned, power zoom lens and standard zoom that start from ultra wide 20mm and I love Sony as a brand too. I choose this over A7CII/R because of its good EVF and 4 ways tilt screen and smaller body don't give benefit with big lens other than weight saving and people still notice you have a camera, A7RV is like just as small but with a big EVF attached. Should I get another lens right away, I have the 16-35mm F4 PZ G in mind, or I should get something faster and prime that still light weight on gimbal? I don't really care for bokeh, that tele will able to do it too if I want to, I like my photos and videos to have story and creativity and not blur out the contexts.
    Also, have you wonder why put so many effort just to take photos and videos and not just use phone camera to record here and there if it's not your primary work and also your content not all will get pass down and value later?
    And what camera setup you bring in everyday life and travel, some people use less bulky and performance camera for their own life but use fancy gears for clients and travel, why, isn't everyday life is most parts of our life and important too?

  • @182-media
    @182-media 22 дні тому

    But OSS cancels out IBIS and the other way around right? Dont think you will get both

  • @MollyFitzBrown
    @MollyFitzBrown 2 роки тому

    I want this! Probably going to sell my 20mm and just rock this for vlogging with my a7iv :)

  • @DMGGoodTimes
    @DMGGoodTimes 8 місяців тому

    bro have you checked your description.. so many links, hard to find the one you mention in your video!

  • @photosblossomsau1624
    @photosblossomsau1624 2 роки тому

    You prefer this that the 24gm?

  • @andreascalmy6970
    @andreascalmy6970 Рік тому

    And what about the 16-35 f/4 power zoom vs the 16-35 f/2.8 g master ?

  • @tristanturner
    @tristanturner 2 роки тому +8

    Love the testing during a ad portion. Nice touch

  • @andyjack1974
    @andyjack1974 2 роки тому

    Great video as always. May I ask what gimbal you used for some of the shots of your holiday?? Looking for a gimbal for my a7s3

  • @waynebelfast
    @waynebelfast 2 роки тому

    Have you a Rode NTG mic going directly into a camera?

  • @MarcVargas
    @MarcVargas 2 роки тому

    What hand tripod was shown in this video ??

  • @63MacGuy
    @63MacGuy 2 роки тому

    When will this lens be available?

  • @borjer2935
    @borjer2935 8 місяців тому

    Is this compatible with a7iii?

  • @THELIFEOFCB
    @THELIFEOFCB 2 роки тому

    What kind of gimbal is that in the beginning?

  • @heymiike
    @heymiike 2 роки тому

    Love that Casino Royale clip lmao!
    Just sold my f2.8 GM and placed an order on this! It's a no brainer to make the switch since i'm using A7S3 with awesome low light performance, and the shallow depth of field between 2.8 and 4 is really not that huge unless you are doing really high end professional work, for run & gun shoot, this lens is amazing and I can't wait to see what Sony has to offer later!
    Great video Chris, keep them up!

  • @BoboMedia007
    @BoboMedia007 2 роки тому

    Tempted to sell my 16-35 2.8 GM. I’m not sure if I’d miss that 2.8 though.

  • @naturallymitch
    @naturallymitch Рік тому

    If I had watched this video just a few hours ago, I probably would have left the store with one or at least pre-ordered it. Would love to see you put this up against the Tamron 17-28 :)

  • @lythnork6131
    @lythnork6131 2 роки тому +1

    As a filmmaker should I buy 16-35 f4 or sigma 24-70 2.8?

    • @everonproducties
      @everonproducties 2 роки тому +1

      Those are two totally difrent types of lenses, id advice the 24-70 if you have no other lens. If you already got a mid range zoom, buy the 16-35

  • @bradl2636
    @bradl2636 Рік тому

    How does this pan out now the new G lens is $200 more expensive than the OSS version? That’s NEW for used the difference is $600 I’m seeing… interested in your take.

  • @ForrestWest
    @ForrestWest 2 роки тому +2

    I had the sony 16-35 2.8 and sold it since I wasn't using it a lot and bought a used camera body and 3 lenses with the money lol. Do you think the difference between 2.8 and f/4 is going to result in a really huge difference in the images and backgrounds? I'm guessing I wouldn't always have been shooting at 2.8 anyway. Entertaining and informative video! Best of luck to you!

    • @nightdonutstudio
      @nightdonutstudio 2 роки тому +1

      If you vlog and still want to have more blur background, you need f2.8. Also for wedding indoor event videographer, f2.8 is necessary.

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому +4

      F4 is more than enough, as I said in the video wide in general isnt going to give you a ton of background separation

  • @AlChered
    @AlChered 2 роки тому

    Hey Chris! I thought you've been using Sigma 12-24 instead. What made you stay with 16-35? Thanks!

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      12-24 was a loaner from sigma. Not mine unfortunately

  • @stowgood
    @stowgood 2 роки тому

    I wish my 16-35 2.8 gm had the pz. I don't think I would sell my GM for this and I already have the 35 1.4 GM and plan to buy that Tamron 35-150 do I really need 4 lenses that can do 35m. I want this so much for using on a gimbal.

  • @Luke-vg7ut
    @Luke-vg7ut 2 роки тому

    What do you mean no one was asking for this? This is exactly what Ive been begging for

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      Just because a PZ is pretty niche, you must be super happy they came out with this then!

  • @GRZYMKOWSKIoMotoryzacji
    @GRZYMKOWSKIoMotoryzacji 2 роки тому

    It's also slower and more expensive and only a little lighter that Sigma 16-28 f/2.8. A better choice IMO 😉

  • @scampifingers
    @scampifingers 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the vid you've really tempted me into considering selling my 20mm for versatility of the zoom range in video I can't justify both.. If you could pick one which would you choose?
    a comparison video might be a shout👀

    • @hamroz1
      @hamroz1 Рік тому

      What have you end up doing? Lol I’m in the same dilemma 🤣

    • @BenSussmanpro
      @BenSussmanpro 8 місяців тому

      I sold my 20mm f/1.8 to buy this lens, which is far more versatile. I’m glad I did. This lens is super sharp, & never really needed a wide open aperture on this type of lens.

  • @Donbros
    @Donbros 2 роки тому

    It can be nice for streaming

  • @GregTardif
    @GregTardif 2 роки тому +1

    cool beans. I think that things is nifty great stuff

  • @chrisbrockhurst
    @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому +3

    If you have been looking at learning to shoot weddings my class is actually done and out now! - skl.sh/3M0r2Tk

  • @erikbackx3927
    @erikbackx3927 2 роки тому

    I own a 16-35mm of Zeiss especially for photography. Is the sharpness of the new sony 16-35mm so much better?
    I recently bought a Sony 14mm f:1.8 GM and this lens is very sharp! (of course) but I am looking for the same sharpness in a 16-35mm.
    What is your advice?

    • @hamroz1
      @hamroz1 Рік тому

      What have you end up doing? Lol did you get the new 16-35? Or Sony 14 is better? Please let me know as idk which wide to get

    • @erikbackx3927
      @erikbackx3927 Рік тому

      @@hamroz1
      I kept the 'old' Zeiss lens. good enough for my purposes.

    • @hamroz1
      @hamroz1 Рік тому

      @@erikbackx3927 oh okay! So the 14mm Sony wasn’t worth it?

    • @erikbackx3927
      @erikbackx3927 Рік тому

      @@hamroz1
      Oh YES! The 14mm is a GM-lens with outstanding performance! But I only use it for landscape fotografie.

    • @hamroz1
      @hamroz1 Рік тому

      @@erikbackx3927 what’s your advise for someone who occasionally uses wide angle but mainly for realestate? Which lens would you go for

  • @TimshelFilms
    @TimshelFilms 2 роки тому +4

    The only lens that i feel like I’ve actually “needed” in a very long time. for RE video I shoot 14mm prime then throw on that 24-70 or 35 prime for details, and I feel like this is the best lens at a realistic price point for every RE videographer. Bc honestly NOBODY needs 2.8 for RE video or establishing wedding shots.

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому +1

      So true, the price really is a massive feature, for what it offers it’s extremely competitive

  • @mrblacktino
    @mrblacktino 2 роки тому +6

    Glad I’m not the only one who thought this. I sold my GMaster when I saw the images with this lens. The GM always seemed soft to me and combined with the weight and the fact I never took full advantage of f2.8, it’s a no brainer. Now I just have to hold out until June 😅

  • @agenericaccount3935
    @agenericaccount3935 2 роки тому

    I just can’t give up OSS. Personal preference. If it weren’t the case, I’d be on this like white on rice.

  • @KeithAvila
    @KeithAvila 26 днів тому

    Why wouldn’t you say what the name of the lens is?

  • @GlassfilmWeddings
    @GlassfilmWeddings 2 роки тому

    2.8>4. 50 1.2 just got it cant wait

  • @ivandj707
    @ivandj707 2 роки тому

    Liked video after 25" and watched to the end. Thanks.

  • @Newt211
    @Newt211 2 роки тому

    Sheraton at Black Rock?

  • @User-pq2yn
    @User-pq2yn Місяць тому

    Sony 16-35mm Vario-Tessar T FE F4 costs $998, not $1398

  • @MichaelWarthStudios
    @MichaelWarthStudios 2 роки тому

    My current feelings with Sony and all these new bits is like the part in the movie, Braveheart. You know, when the entire line of Scottish soldiers were facing down the English charge and Mel Gibson kept yelling, “HOLD…HOLD…”

  • @OriginaldoBo
    @OriginaldoBo 2 роки тому +1

    I’m in the same boat man!

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      Don’t know how they are selling it so damn cheap. It’s a beauty

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo 2 роки тому +1

      @@chrisbrockhurst I bought that Zeiss 16-35 and I’m kicking myself because this new lens just tanked the resale. Also can I just say it should be a law every lens needs a dedicated iris ring

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      ​@@OriginaldoBo If you can sell it now you might be alright but that puts you without it for a few months.. the OSS will still be a draw for some people but i can honestly see Sony dropping the price of the Zeiss too, makes zero sense priced where it is now.

  • @robertfontaine3650
    @robertfontaine3650 2 роки тому

    Except for the F4 it sounds great.

  • @_rhapsodist
    @_rhapsodist 2 роки тому

    I would also love the upcoming 24-70 GM II to be an internal zoom PZ lens!
    One can hope..

    • @_rhapsodist
      @_rhapsodist 2 роки тому

      unfortunately its not as it turns out from the leaked picture

  • @Marlon5k
    @Marlon5k 4 місяці тому

    I think I can recognize DOM REP Hotels at first sight! Was I right?

  • @Michael-uo1qv
    @Michael-uo1qv 2 роки тому

    This or the 20mm 1.8? I have a 24-20, 70-180, need a wide lens. I don't shoot real estate, just would like something wider than 24 mm. Thoughts?

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому +1

      Very different lenses, F4 vs F1.8 is a whole debate in itself. If it’s just the focal length your after then this is a no brainer

    • @F1REBEARD
      @F1REBEARD 2 роки тому +1

      Make a custom button for clear image zoom, and voila, you have a 30mm 1.8 lens. Also if your camera has it, crop mode gives you additionally x1,5 reach which gives you 45mm 🕺

    • @CC-gt3ro
      @CC-gt3ro Рік тому

      Tamron 17-28 f2.8 is a very good lens with 6 year warranty. I have it with a7c and it is my main lens. In video it is a 17-42 f2.8 in aps-c mode. Very precise, very good optical lens, fast autofocus, good contrast. Plastic are high quality and weather resistant tested in Alaska in bad weather condition. It is a no brainer.
      The Sony 20mm f1.8 is also a solid lens very good if you work in low light condition or with a gimbal. The tamron has also internal zoom so it is very good with gimbal. The tamron give the advantage to shoot at 17mm for photo, 20, 24, 28,35,42mm for videos without any loss at 4k resolution. Photos are incredible with the tamron from 17 to 28. It is one of the best.

  • @UWMania
    @UWMania 2 роки тому

    What is that beeping sound?

  • @davidglukh6473
    @davidglukh6473 2 роки тому +1

    Before watching I'll guess this is the f4 16-35... although the thumbnail looks wrong then

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      Yep that’s it. But the design looks identical to the 24GM!

  • @touchtennis
    @touchtennis 2 роки тому +3

    Damn! I just picked up the 14-24 sigma and I’m thinking UGH! But I do love sigma and I’m one of those nutters that has to have all their lenses by the same brand! Messes with my head otherwise!

  • @onimar
    @onimar 2 роки тому

    I clicked the subscribe

  • @eaquiros8
    @eaquiros8 2 роки тому

    I would honestly trade my gm straight up for this lens. Not a fan of the gm at all.

  • @mattgray9297
    @mattgray9297 2 роки тому +1

    I’ll still take the Tamron 17-28 f2.8 for $900 instead.

    • @snapjacksonphotography
      @snapjacksonphotography 2 роки тому

      Other than the price, do you feel it beats this lens in most of other categories?

    • @mattgray9297
      @mattgray9297 2 роки тому +2

      @@snapjacksonphotography can’t say this new F4 specifically, but I sold my 16-35 GM after getting the Tamron. IMO, it was a better image, smaller, lighter. Extremely better value.

    • @CC-gt3ro
      @CC-gt3ro Рік тому +1

      @@snapjacksonphotography i have the 17-28 f2.8 and it is an incredible lens in photos and video. I don’t regret my choice. 420g and 17-42mm f2.8 in aps-c mode. Solid and weather resistant, internal zoom and lightweight for gimbals. 6 years warranty. For the price around $1200 Canadians it is difficult to beat. I also have the 70-300. Same thing very good lens as well incredibly lightweight but still very good plastic quality and weather resistant. I use it for animal wild life photography and landscape and i use the 17-28 for everyday use and landscape and videos. Both very sharp and fast autofocus.

  • @one901
    @one901 2 роки тому +1

    I’d get the even cheaper Tamron

  • @Bathingwookie
    @Bathingwookie 2 роки тому

    Get a pull-up bar brother

  • @Kukainis
    @Kukainis 2 роки тому

    how is it cheaper though ? 😄

  • @DailyDrivenDeathTraps
    @DailyDrivenDeathTraps 2 роки тому

    Sigma 14-24 ftw

  • @WillCarterTech
    @WillCarterTech 2 роки тому

    Why are you holding a shot gun mic?

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      You must be new here, welcome! Is there a specific reason why I can’t? Interested 🙃

    • @WillCarterTech
      @WillCarterTech 2 роки тому

      There is nothing specifically wrong with holding the microphone. It’s not designed with handling noise in mind. But your audio sounds great; so there is no issue. I’m just curious why you would spend the extra money on a shotgun microphone, then treat it like a $20 handheld mic; such as the Behringer xm8500.
      I’m sure you have a reason; I was just curious what your rationale was. I have a lot of microphones for different jobs, so I had never thought to hold my shotgun microphone in my hand. I would always grab one of my handheld microphones for that. I thought maybe you had stumbled across something innovative.

  • @tomariko
    @tomariko 2 роки тому

    Sigma is releasing a 16-28 2.8 almost same weight and it will be probably cheaper. I will get the Sigma. Nice review anyway.

  • @butchgo5346
    @butchgo5346 2 роки тому

    "No money exchanged ..." only the lens.

  • @_Doom_20
    @_Doom_20 2 роки тому

    Canons AF feels faster than Sony, coming from a former Canon shooter and a new Sony shooter, it’s not even close especially in Video, cropping in doesn’t solve the focus breathing issue. I mean if Jared Polin is using the R3 for stills over the R1 then I’d say the AF debate is pretty much settled 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      Sony AF speed is adjustable in the camera, you can have it super fast but i don't like the look, I have mine set slower so it looks more natural. Having had, used and owned both Canon and Sony I personally know which is better but importantly more accurate, consistently. Begins with an S.

    • @_Doom_20
      @_Doom_20 2 роки тому

      @@chrisbrockhurst accurate and consistent is canons game, focus breathing alone hinders Sony, thus making it more inconsistent.
      Where I notice it a lot more is at a distance, as soon as the subject enters in the frame, running towards and moving from left to right.
      Maybe I just need to fine tune it more, but that’s just my personal experience with my R6.

  • @hotelphotography
    @hotelphotography 2 роки тому

    Looks like the Dominican Republic, or am I mistaken?

  • @TeeVlogsx2
    @TeeVlogsx2 Рік тому +2

    This video didn’t help

  • @jaecuervoson
    @jaecuervoson Рік тому

    Clarity

  • @photogphotog2512
    @photogphotog2512 2 роки тому

    I wish you ended the video right there. That'd be hilarious :)

  • @davidglukh6473
    @davidglukh6473 2 роки тому

    3rd? 🙈

  • @DeliciousDave92
    @DeliciousDave92 2 роки тому

    2nd

  • @TimothyVictor77
    @TimothyVictor77 2 роки тому

    1st

  • @JTR...
    @JTR... Рік тому

    Look bad with OSS ON

  • @howardhdavidson
    @howardhdavidson 9 місяців тому

    All these lenses are a waist of money.I’ve purchased €15,000 on Sony lenses used with my Sonny A7R 4 and they make no difference to the end quality of my videos ..The Camera and the lenses are rubbish.

    • @Desalt511voider
      @Desalt511voider 3 місяці тому

      Poor craftsman is quick to blame his tools

  • @ekphotography
    @ekphotography 2 роки тому

    The Zeiss is the worst Sony lens I have ever owned.

  • @RonK
    @RonK 2 роки тому

    7 minutes 47 seconds of a lens review video - without ever mentioning its name, except for referring to it a gazillion times as "this lens". Strange approach...

    • @chrisbrockhurst
      @chrisbrockhurst  2 роки тому

      The lens name is shown as a title on every single example shot which is 2/3rds of the video fella 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @unknownpresident
    @unknownpresident 2 роки тому

    Cheaper in the same sentence as sony is a republican talking 👉 Trump tariffs made them more expensive 🤔

  • @antboy425
    @antboy425 2 місяці тому +1

    Should stop using words like “ this one “ to describe an item . Hard to know which lenses you’re referring to at That moment

  • @alfonsocordoba1522
    @alfonsocordoba1522 7 місяців тому

    Smolla ! Largaaa🤣🤣🤣🤣