The Rydberg Formula in the Frequency Domain
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лют 2025
- In this video, I show you how to convert the Rydberg constant and the Rydberg formula from the domain of the wavenumber to the frequency domain. This video was inspired by a paper that I have been studying called "A Frequency Based Theory of Catalyst" which introduces the concept of heterodyning as it relates to the spectral lines generated by the hydrogen atom and the atom in general.
img1.wsimg.com... - Розваги
Hi Fractal Woman, i also believe 2025 will see us deliver on this new tech. I will be pulling hard in this direction.
Thanks to you and your excellent work - was fundamental in building a model in my mind. I gave you a shout out in my last video.
Excellent. Please keep me posted on your progress. I have a feeling, someone from my "team" is going to figure it out.
Wonderful! What's really interesting to me is Balmer's formula. Rydberg followed him and Bohr followed Rydberg, calling his work, "key" to his model. Rydberg should have called Balmer's work "key" to his formula, but he didn't. The interesting thing is Balmer's constant (364.50628 nm) is four (2^2) times the ionization wavelength of Hydrogen, and Rydberg multiplied its inverse by four, to get his constant, which makes the Rydberg constant the reciprocal of that energy, something seldom, if ever, pointed out. Of course, Balmer's formula is square over square, but minus 2^2 in the denominator, for each wavelength. Your formula, placing alpha in the numerator is most interesting! Congratulations! Looking forward to next video! (Love the cycles per meter times the meters per second - it is key)
agreed-- if the big bang theory was a giant, primordial cum shot-- it is kind of like a child thinking a baby is born from the sperm if the father God jerks off into the air and the jizz goes everywhere but somehow a baby is born and he grows up to be exactly like his dad...... it's simply impossible so we begin to be logically certain that science (and religion) is a nonsense story.
psst, powerguy, any equations in top of your head where freq^16 is included? i have one big 70 y old untruth to demolish (context trigger=msg i-reised, so im vague), maybe there are exising solutions... related to topic on planetary scale
Sweet, happy Gregorian new year, late night fun for me👍
NICE WORK and interpretation how u viewed as usual ! Using MUA
Happy New Year, Mrs. Lori.
The relationship presented at the end is interesting, relating the spectral frequency with the Compton frequency.
Looking a little more closely at the relationship, I made some adjustments that led me to the following:
2(fs/fc) = [(α/n1)^2 - (α/n2)^2]
Which can be converted into an equilateral hyperbolic equation:
- hyperbolic equation: (x^2)/(a^2) - (y^2)/(b^2) = 1
- if a = b then an equilateral hyperbolic equation is obtained:
(x^2)/(a^2) - (y^2)/(a^2) = 1 -> [(x^2) - (y^2)]/(a^2) = 1
In which:
x = α/n1 y = α/n2 and (a^2) = 2(fs/fc)
So that:
[(α/n1)^2 - (α/n2)^2] / 2(fs/fc) = 1
Which is consistent with a geometry related to General Relativity.
Does this lead to a link between these two phenomena?
This sounds interesting. I like how you extracted the equilateral hyperbolic equation from this. It is not clear to me how this is consistent with the geometry of general relativity? Can you elaborate a bit more on that?
@@FractalWoman Minkowski space-time is created on a basis of hyperbolic geometry (it is related to the light cone presented in Relativity).
[I don't have much depth on this subject, just what I learned during my degree - I just know that it involves quaternions, which you always present in your videos].
@@elson_jf Thanks. I will keep this in mind.
I'm sorry I can't contribute more at the moment. I would need to review the content and study a little more to effectively establish a possible relationship.
@@elson_jf Truthfully, I'm not a big fan of Minkowski space-time where they turn time into a spatial dimension by multiplying by c. It seems like a hack to me. I think they could have done everything using quaternions where time is real and x, y and z are imaginary. Lots to think about.
Hai Mrs. Lori, Happy New Year. I am writing to you while drinking coffees on Island of Bali.
The Alfa power over on Compton law could happen on substrate spectral, but the realization on quantum state far to the bases rather than regular oxidate (oxidation).
I do feel the danger on bias to presumption on the catalyst.
That is to say there is electron work on Lewis bases for realization to quantum states. The characteristics electron should follow Lewis bases in non coherence (realism).
🌔 Sorry if I am slipping up on the topic, Need your highly advance view on the subject.
Happy New Year!
PS Could history be fractal too? 🙃
Sick
Sick in a good way right? LOL
Have you checked out alchemical science by any chance? Cool channel
I think alchemy can be explained using heterodyning as well as cold fusion. It is a subtle but very important effect.
are you familiar with the Electric Universe? Thunderbolts Project. SAFIRE
@@ozradek1 Yes. I pay close attention to their work.
i'm beginning to wonder if the math is just complicating things in early world building stages. It seems like the numbers should be decided at death rather than birth. the math is needed to create an automated spacetime.... however, there are many organic beings on earth that need more complicated archetypes that aren't robotic. Science and math are important but until we understand what consciousness (and death) actually means we will continue to misunderstand the power of AI.