The Difference Between "Son of God" and "Son of Man"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 лис 2020
- Jesus is given many titles in Scripture. What does it mean that He is the “Son of God” and the “Son of Man”? In this brief clip, R.C. Sproul reveals that these two titles actually signify something different than what we might expect.
Transcript: ligm.in/3k52RVA
Message: ligm.in/36dOrgK
Years ago I used to listen to RC on the radio during my morning commute. He was instrumental in bringing me back to my relationship with God.
Wow that’s great to hear 😃
Praise God for that!
Which god, there's 3,000 of them .
@Mark OnTheBlueRidge How do you know all this?,...you don't, you're just superstitious, people make stuff up all the time; this 'one who is real', and satan, ever seen either of them?,..........thought not.
@Mark OnTheBlueRidge I think you have swallowed religion, look what its done to your brain. You are simply asserting gods, demons and the supernatural, without a trace of evidence.Science has questions that can't be answered, religion has answers that can't be questioned., so what is your evidence?, without spouting bible verses that is.
Amen. So glad to live in a time where we can listen to those who were godly, and who have gone before us. Praise God.
I'm not sure who selects these snippets to post, but these are great and helpful.
Enlightening.
Please can anyone tell me who the speaker is
@J D
Thanks
@Mikey Mike you’re just looking for attention. If you don’t believe in God, why do you hate Him? Your anger and all the efforts you make trying to bash Christianity only proofs that you DO believe it’s real, but you hate it. Why would you hate Someone Who loved you to the point of dying on a cross for you?
HERE is The Original Semitic Text, HERE is The Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER WAS Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Semitic Scroll:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
Oh how we miss RC so much! God blessed us tremendously with a man such as RC Sproul. His compassionate way of explaining to people, appealing to their inner soul was very humbling, indeed. "Thank you Lord for choosing RC to reveal more of who you are, through his particular style of expression." And thank you for this VERY special Yinzer! Much love from Cali.. Amen
You are the son of whom you obey!! So powerful!!!
This is truly great stuff. That was a whole meal served to us by God via RC Sproul.
Thanks for doing that.
R.C. Had such blessedly way of explaining these types of things.
Just like John Gerstner.
@@ChandraAnandInChrist I'm going to have to check him out. Thanks for pointing him out.
@Messiah Мashiach Mahdi Maitreya Shiva Vishnu Which one?
So you understood that garble? Just wondering. If the title Son of God denotes obedience to the Father then why were the fallen angels who mated with women and caused the Nephilim in Genesis called sons of God.
I tried to follow this guy’s explanation but it just didn’t seem to hold together.
@@fivebooks8498 Its the usual word salad where god is a semantic theistic trick, he is intentionally unfalsifiable,ie, hidden, works in mysterious ways etc etc.Masses of people can believe really weitrd things based on grossly insufficient evidence, even when there are more likely explanations, like people make stuff up. The only writing passed down to us is from believers,the gospels are tales of the supernatural, start to finish, angels demons resurrections ,...ad nauseum.
Enlightening lesson. Thank you Dr. Sproul.
Amen Glory to the Lord Jesus
Wow this is so true and I just realized it,glory to Jesus
Excellent short message by R.C. sproul. Thanks to the ministry.
All of us who seek the Lord fully, these preachers/ teachers are so important because of their passion for Christ and love for others. Thank you Lord for your teachings!!
These so called preachers could be having an agenda of their own. This might help.
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
@@tongakhan230
“For to which of the angels did God ever say,
‘You are my Son; today I have become your Father.’?
“Or again,
‘I will be his Father and he will be my Son.’?
“And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says,
‘Let all God’s angels worship him.’
“In speaking of the angels he says,
‘He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire.’
“But about the Son he says,
‘Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions by anointing you with the oil of joy.’
“He also says,
‘In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment,
You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they shall be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.’
“To which of the angels did God ever say,
‘Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet.’ “
~Hebrews 1:5-13
@@littlefishbigmountain : Quite so! Jesus was chosen from among the angels. Angels are sons of God (Job 1:6).
If I ask the question: "Which of the horses was used in the parade?" The answer would logically be one of the horses and not an elephant.
Paul wrote 'To which of the angels .....' - Hebrews 1:5,13.
@@tongakhan230
Why would God say, “Let all the angels worship him” if he himself was an angel?
And also:
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things he may have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in him all the fullness should dwell, and by him to reconcile all things to Himself, by him, whether things on earth or things in heaven, having made peace through the blood of his cross.”
~Colossians 1:15-20
It explicitly says that he was before all things and that nothing was made except through him, including all thrones and dominions and principalities and powers. So how can Jesus be any of those things, then? And how could he be a created thing of heaven if through him all things of heaven were created?
@Moses Hillocks
I didn’t skip over it. You skipped over all the rest. How can ALL things be made through Jesus and without Him nothing made that was made, visible and invisible, if He Himself was made? (John 1:1-3)
R. C. had such a marvelous gift in his manner of speaking. His delivery, cadence, enthusiasm and grasp of the scripture was truly inspiring. He had a great sense of humor and had the ability to make light of himself.
Listening to R.C. was so enjoyable. The sound of his voice had a soothing effect. I love the story where he said that someone made the comment (referring to R. C.'s teaching) that "he made the scriptures come alive".
R.C. responded by saying, "I can't make something come alive that's already alive."
That was R. C.. He was confident but humble. He knew who he was and he understood who the Creator was; a Holy God, a Just God, a God of limitless Power, a God of Mercy and Truth.
Well said
I've never heard this explained so beautifully like this. Thank you, pastor. Glory to Lord Jesus Christ.
Why not see what the Bible DOES TEACH.
The SoM was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
@@tongakhan230 yeah, pretty sure that's what R C Sproul said
@@kathyhollenbach7413 : I think RCS teaches that Jesus is God himself.
An abomination no doubt.
Just trying to help.
@@tongakhan230thanks for scripture
I'm just so grateful that God decided to come down here to earth and take human form to experience everything we do and be willing to die for all of us so that we can reconciled back to Him!! Praise God 4 all Eternity!!
This is probably one of the best explanations I've heard for the Son of Man vs Son of God. Praise the Lord for videos like these and those with the gift of teaching.
I knew this before but it jumped at me anew all over again. ✝️🙏
Wow! This is spot on! I am exceedingly grateful.
Thank you very much. I've often wondered and searched, but this is the first time anyone has really explained it.
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
Jesus was NEVER God. But God's angelic son.
Thank you, this is very helpful in shedding light on a complex topic
One of my favorite teachers! 🤗 what a blessing to so many lives!
Guys,
YaH The Heavenly FATHER was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Semitic Scroll:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
@@Praise___YaH Jesus was crucified, the father put his wrath upon Jesus. What you are saying is not thought by the Bible.
@@Ramon-kw2rh
That is incorrect. Let’s PROVE who jesus REALLY is
In Revelation 22:16, in RED LETTERS, a DIRECT QUOTE from jesus HIMSELF:
jesus is the:
1. “offspring of David”, the “Son of Man”
2. “Morning Star”
FIRST:
1. jesus is the “Son of Man”
Here’s the PROBLEM
Numbers 23:19
YaH is NOT a MAN
YaH is NOT the SON of MAN
PROVES this jesus, the “son of MAN” is NOT YaH as YaH is NOT the “son of MAN”
PROVES this jesus, the “son of MAN” is NOT YaH’s “son” as YaH is NOT a MAN
The ONLY “son” YaH EVER CREATED was Adam and that was from the Dust of the Earth
SECOND:
2. jesus is the “MORNING STAR” and the “Morning Star”, the “Son of Dawn”, is LUCIFER (Isaiah 14)
LUCIFER, that’s IS who jesus is
@@Praise___YaH your exegeses and interpretation is so wrong. The son of man described in Daniel is Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is God in the flesh (John 1).
I wonder what UA-cam videos you watched for you to come to such false conclusions. The Morningstar in Isaiah and in Revelation are completely different and differently discriped.
You define Jesus by one verse? And then so totally wrong. In a Book where Jesus, the lamb, is worshipped and still you think Jesus is satan???
For your teachings you have to put the whole new testament away, even the verse you referred to.
Read the the new testament and believe what it says. And don't do no eisegeses with the name of the lord smh.
Repent and put your trust in Jesus Christ.
@@Ramon-kw2rh
jesus is the “son of Man”, that is correct, HOWEVER:
Numbers 23:19
YaH is not a Man
YaH is not the son of Man
PROVES, this jesus is NOT YaH OR YaH’s son
So you should go back and READ what I shared
Brought me to tears. God has given us so much as evidence to His character through the Bible. When we're honest, we can't find any fault in it. God's word brings life.
@TooMuchOnline how does it endorse slavery? Just because it is recorded in the Bible does not mean it is supported... there are also people murdering others, people messing around with multiple wives, but God never said “ya I condone this behavior”. You have to understand the context before you make ignorant remarks.
@TooMuchOnline spoken out of pure ignorance. I'd begin how slavery really is portrayed in the Bible and outline the differences to what you've been spoon-fed, but I'm 100% sure it would be lost on you. If you actually cared about the subject, you could easily find a few articles or a book online that would give an accurate portrayal within the context of the era. It's best to do that quietly until you find a clue. 🤣 😂
(1). Yes, Jesus said he is Son of God and Son of Man. He never, never said he is God. He said that the Father is one true God; your God and my God, your father and my father. Crystal clear that his message is the oneness of God and submission to His will.
(2). Jesus message is similar message of oneness of God and submission to His will, brought by Abraham, Noah, David, Moses and Muhammad pbuh.
@@sethsuleiman4419 Jesus is called Immanuel, which is translated "God with us." The prophet Isaiah (7:14) foretold His coming and we read the fulfillment of this prophecy in the book of Matthew 1:23. Jesus told the Pharisees "before Abraham was, I Am." This is the phrase God the Father used to define Himself when Moses asked who he should tell the Israelites who sent him (Exodus 3:14). The Pharisees took up stones to kill him for what they thought was blasphemy. They did not know Jesus is God who came to us in the flesh.
My friend, Jesus identified as God throughout His ministry in earth and He was written about numerous times in the Old Testament. He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father but through Him (John 14:6). I pray you will know Him and put your faith in Jesus who is the only One who can save men's souls.
@@sethsuleiman4419 Jesus is God in the flesh. There are several verses where that is said. Don’t get twisted by Islamic teachings
Thank so much for this clear explanation Mr. Sproul. RIP until we come to meet you. Come Jesus come…
Thank you this was very informative. Praise God!
Thank you for explaining about the Son of Man .
Thank you, I learned.
R.C Sproul still speaks even today and I'm still learning.
Praise God for the life of this man.
1 Peter 1:23b - ...the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
If the word of God dwells in you and you in the word then you too will "abide forever". This is the key to everlasting life.
Thank you for increasing my understanding
Well explained, may God bless you.
Thank you out for making that clear to me. It indeed takes scripture to explain scripture. Again thank you.
Such a good teacher. May he rest in heavenly peace.
I have been wondering about this for years!
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
JESUS CHRIST IS MY HEAVENLY FATHER. MY LORD , MY KING , MY ALL.
Amen brother. Jesus is the Father in flesh.
Its more than just saying it You have to live by the words dont think you taking a short cut
@@victorcolon4607
Don't say anything if you don't know me.. I know what I'm saying and I know this is the truth.. I live better now with Jesus. Don't judge..
@@SandyCB7 your relationship with God is a personal relationship you don't need another person to bring you to him. And just like all good parents they grow you up and then they let you go out into the world on your own.
@@victorcolon4607
I have a relationship with God. And Jesus is the one person to be with God. Without Jesus we are nothing.. So yeah you need a relationship with CHRIST..
I'm not in the least a Calvinist, but had the utmost respect for RC as a thinker. Absolutely brilliant man. RIP
HERE is the ORIGINAL Semitic Text, PLEASE READ This
YaH The Heavenly FATHER was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Semitic Scroll:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
@@Praise___YaH The Son is crucified for our salvation :D
@@saiah4070
“and you shall call His Name Emmanuel (with us is GOD)” GOD sir, NOT some “son”
NOW, go back and READ what I shared. Praise YaH
@@Praise___YaH I did😊
Now explain this
John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only SON, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
Please don't ignore the New Testament😁
@@saiah4070
John 3:16????????
Isaiah 45:10 - WOE unto the one who says to the Father, what have you begotten or to a Mother, what have you brought to birth
What a study! Thanks for this light.
Thank you brother for heartful message
Praise to the Lord Yahweh
Glory to the GREAT SON OF MAN, THE FATHER SON and THEIRS OWN SPIRIT KNOWN AS THE HOLY SPIRIT
AMEN TO THE ALFA & OMEGA..
God had no son god create Adam as also without father or mother there is no other god except one allah allah have no partner Mohammad esha as prophet messenger of allah so pray to allah not jesus beleive in akhirat after the dead judgement day ok accept islam
We do pray to god though?
brilliant explanation. Thank you for the upload.
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
This is great! Thank you & God bless u😇
Thank you brothers
@Messiah Мashiach Mahdi Maitreya Shiva Vishnu 😊
Now i know. The creator of this majestic and immense universe was a Jew from Nazareth. Amazing
@J D nope..because he was a son of a woman.
@J D i dont want to read the bible. Nobody knows who wrote it
I dont believe Paul either. We have no proof that he saw Jesus. No proof whatsoever
Though I'm not a calvinist, I do love and miss RC Sproul. I used to listen to his radio broadcasts regularly.
wow.. Praise the Lord Jesus😍😇
So Son of God means that Jesus is submissive towards the Father while the Son of Man is the one who will judge this world, descends and ascends to and fro Heaven?
Yes and no. Son of God also refers to God the Son. The eternal sonship of Christ. Son of Man also refers Christ as a human. Both statements have dual seemingly conflicting meanings. Both that is the mystery of the hypostatic union of Christ. Simultaneously fully God and fully man.
Do you have any verses to back this up or is it something you are assuming. Sounds like something out of a Joyce Meyer or Joel Osteen teaching.
@@Tdizzle7775 God the son---- that expression is not found in the Bible , thus is wrong. Son of God is in N.T. at least 40 times.
@@ralphgoreham3516 testimony of john the baptist, The heavens opened up and the voice said, "This is my beloved son." The Holy Spirit descended in the form of a dove and went to Jesus.
@@skellingtonmeteoryballoon That just goes with the other 40 0r 50 occasions he is said to be the SON of God. That was his anointing by holy spirit . When a man or woman is anointed holy spirit comes upon them also. I assume you think this suggests a trinity. If so pehaps you would like to explain how you get three Gods to be one God from this occasion.
This is very good except the part where he says that Jesus fulfilled the role of Son of Man (as judge) when He came the first time, but Jesus Himself said that He came not to judge (John 3:17, 8:15, 12:47). Therefore, He will finish His role as Son of Man as Judge at the Second Coming and on into the Millennial Kingdom (the fulfillment of Daniel 7:13-14, 2:36-45), the conclusion of which will be the judgment of all unbelievers (Revelation 20:7-15).
@V Max I'm not confused at all. It's because I have a historical-literal-grammatical hermeneutic that I can confidently put Jesus' words into context and see no contradictions in the Scriptures.
@V Max Even if Revelation was written pre-AD 70, it doesn't change a thing. AD 70 did not meet all of the prophecies concerning the second coming. Revelation is about the second coming in which the entire world will be judged, not just the Jews in Israel.
I'm not going to argue with you about it, though, because I've written two books that touch on this subject after having studied it for 20 years. I can tell, given your forceful and truncated writing, that you are adamant that your position is correct. I'm certainly not going to change my position having been fully convinced through the Scriptures. And I'm not inclined to debate with someone who seems to be looking for a fight rather than a Godly discussion.
@@carolberubee I clicked on this comment because your original comment does not tag you.
R.C. Sproul did not say Jesus "fulfilled the role of Son of Man" in his first coming. Son of Man is the title of Judge.....which is seen in Daniel 7. The reason Jesus told the Jews He had not come to judge the world is because the Jews thought the Messiah was to come and destroy the Gentile world.
No one is trying to have a "fight" with you. V Max was not " being forceful."
I am not trying to change your position. I do think your position is wrong.
@V Max Then, my apologies for assuming you were just another angry preterist looking to fight me. I can't count the times... My bad for assuming.... Please forgive me.
@Carol Berubee I concur with your initial post. I find it hard to believe that there are so many people who claim to have read the Bible but come up with different interpretations. The Bible seems to me crystal clear on this issue.
So glad God is on UA-cam now😇
I have been truly enriched with this truth.
Exactly! That is why skeptic scholars like Bart Ehrman haven't a clue when he says only the gospel of John speaks of Jesus's Deity.
The difference is that Bart doesn't make stuff up; the gospels weren't even signed, and there are copies of copies of tranaslations of translations which all contradict each other.
@@timothywilliams4089 Bart has a bias, he admits it, we all do. He misses the point though that all of the gospels speak to Jesus's Deity, not just as directly as the gospel of John.
Bart also admits that copying errors or a seeming difference in a story told, changes nothing about Christian doctrine, including the resurrection of Jesus.
You should look up Peter Williams, Lydia McGrew, Mike Licona, and Gary Habermas. Different scholars not always agreeing, but they more than cover why we can rely on the gospels and the resurrection of Jesus as historical fact. God-bess
@@flamingswordapologetics No, WE cannot rely on the gospels and resurrection as historical fact, your are simply confirming the bible with the bible.You should not spend time interpreting a book written by people who didn't know there were dinosaurs, and your god, a theistic trick, is intentionally unfalsifiable, hidden, and who works in 'mysterious ways'.Masses of people can believe really weird things on grossly insufficient evidence, even when there are more likely explanations, eg, people make stuff up, the only writing passed down to us is from believers.The gospels are tales of the supernatural, start to finish, angels, demons, raising the dead etc. The worrying thing is that most of the USA believes this nonsense.
Amen all four Gospels speak to /of the deity of Yeshua of Nazareth
@@tsi940 Unsigned gospels,...don't you read anything more educational,.....eg Harry Potter.
I'll break it down nice and easy.
When talking about Jesus:
Son of Man - equal to humans.
Son of God - equal to God.
Wow thanks made it much clear thanks HOLYSPIRIT 🙏😊😊 Thanks so much for posting, GOD bless you
Amen. Hallelujah. Praise the LORD 🙏
There is one timeless God from whom his Word and Spirit emanate into everlasting times and all time.
God is outside of all types of time!
Psalm 33:6, Isaiah 55:11
A Son/offspring is a container of same Life / nature !
God will be *in all* as sons !
(Those Who accept the Christ)
Sorry Irish Home but either in heaven or earth Fathers cause their offspring to begin. Fathers cause the birth of a son. Fathers also exist first. Jesus is not God because he had a beginning in heaven Rev 3:14, God "begat" him, and was his firstborn. John 3:16, Col. 1:15. Jesus likewise said at " John 6:57," Just as the living Father sent me forth and I live because of the Father........" and he said at John 5:26 "The Father has granted to son to have life in himself, (immortality). Read Proverbs 8:22--31. He has Gods nature but there is no verse that says Jesus has the same life.
@@ralphgoreham3516
Immortality / everlasting life is same life !
You just gave the verses ..same nature!
That nature came in a body of flesh as Sonship!
Previously the WORD was in God and emanated from God before incarnation. Scriptures already quoted ..
Read 1 john 1:1-4 .
What life came in flesh ?
Answer: the eternal life of God came in flesh! God's life inhabited Flesh
God granted a flesh container to have his life .a temple of God, considered as a Son !
1 Corinthians 3 and 6
A WORD does not have a body !
It comes from a conscious mind of thoughts. It's not a Son, unless you are able to give it a body..
The WORD had no body in heaven...it was incarnated in flesh as a Son !
The WORD emanates from God and returns to be in God.
Psalm 33:6, isaiah 55:11
@@ralphgoreham3516
The WORD emanates from God and returns to be *in God* like a mode.
Psalm 33:6, isaiah 55:11
Sonship was envisaged and personified in Yahweh as a mode in timelessness, and actually occured in the incarnation as a Son.
As heat is a mode of motion, so God's creative activity is Sonship!
@@irishhomedeemob677 The Word is a title not a name. Rev 19:13. His heavenly name is Michael. He is not a "mode" 1 Thess 4:16, Dan 12:1, Rev 12:7--9 , He is a person. Acts 5:31. Psm 33:6 = Jehovah ASV; Jerusalem Bible, Byingtons KJV =LORD. Isiah 55:11 , again it is Jehovah speaking. It says" my word" (not capitalized and does not have the definite article The as does John 1:1. No reputable scholar would ever say Jehovah is Jesus.
@@ralphgoreham3516
1914 DOA false prophet
I've never been confused by this reference, Both express his deity.
How can I find the full teaching that this is from?
Does RC have a book that explains this teaching?
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
@@tongakhan230 - Thank you.
How can I find RC's full teaching that this is from?
Does RC have a book that explains this teaching?
That was beautifully explained-clear and concise. Dr. Sproul will surely be missed. I hope that God would raise up men like him again who would faithfully and courageously proclaim the truth of Scripture without compromise and with rigor.
Thank you so much for this, Ligonier Ministries! Your work for the Lord and His church is greatly appreciated. I pray that the Holy Spirit will continuously advance the cause of the Gospel through your ministry.
God bless! Soli Deo gloria!
He never mentioned himself as the Son of God. Stop it man.
According to Paul in Romans 1:4. Jesus was Declared as the Son of God in power by his resurrection from the dead.. Jesus probably did not claim himself as the son of God, but instead refer to himself as the Son of Man because by that time in his ministry he is not yet Resurrected..Daniel's prophecy on the Son of Man foretold that in Judgement Day, Jesus will judge humanity..
Amen
Please read John 10:36. He also said he was a "man" . John 8:40. So did Paul twice' Romans 5:15, 1 Tim 2:5.
Understanding the title “Son of Man” allows us to understand why Caiaphas tore his clothing and called Jesus a blasphemer, exhausted Jesus was claiming to be the one in Daniel 7 which can only mean He is God.
Not only the “son of man” declaration, but the whole divine imagery Jesus used, that he will come on the clouds, sitting in the right hand of the Power. The son on man vision from Daniel was identified by the Jews themselves as a vision about the messiah, so for them , when Jesus told them “I am the son of man”, they understood “ I am the messiah, the King of Israel and of everything , anointed and enthroned by God”. What Jesus told them instead, was that he was divine and he would be sitting on the Throne of God with the Father. Claiming to be the Messiah wasn’t a crime for Jews but the opposite. Claiming to be divine though, was the worst crime of all. Blasphemy worthy of death.
@@nikostheater He was telling the truth though 😊
@@nikostheater I completely agree.
Wow, it makes sense to me. Thank you.
This video explains these 2 concepts well.
Actually, in Hebrew, Daniel does not say "ben Adam", but "ben asash"...Son of mortal. and some of the verb ending are feminine...
The comment above was interpreted by the same person that says the following about herself on one of her UA-cam videos:
""Talk about male stalkers..Ithis incident occured in mid-March, 2019. I homeless for more than eighteen months because I was a whistle-blower who was blackballed and then went through retaliation for over 8 years, when they did much of this. Then, for the next five months the stalkers came in person and out of the woodwork. All homosexual or transgender men who had not transitioned. They were all in drag, like Fiona Hill. All of them were giving advice on how women should behave, how to behave better... They told me what their pregnancies were like. These are real messages. I put them on You Tube. Several of them were Jewish, like Allen. All were occultist. They tried persuasion using psychology, theology, Cabalism; some sent spells and curses. They stole and they broke into my car to take my compter and the case I was working on. I have gone so many times to Law Enforcement, FBI, FCHR, OIG, unions. I have these cases. It is incredible. I am denied protection under the law, constantly.
They went after me in person. The "in person" stalking did not stop until mid- June 2019. In 2018, after I had given my documents to the Catholic Church/Clergy, which I had sent to the Russian Embassy, explaining my offer for a three year moratorium during which time no one, either clergy, politician, or regular person, would be prosecuted if they repented, came out with what was happening, made restitutions, and changed. They went after me. They refuse to discuss the real Adam an Garden story and now I understand why. The prophesy and discussion of their Thracian.Dacian Dragon roots which is found in prophesy which go back to the garden story and the Books of Daniel, Mica, and Isaiah."
Partially right. "Son of Man" as given in Daniel 7:13 is not ''Ben Adam.' You are correct.
Here's what it is: בַ֥ר אֱנָ֖שׁ (H/A)
"Bar -Enosh" : the second letter of the earlier Hebrew Name given here (in later Heb. form ie Aram.) as אֱנָ֖שׁ is the letter 'nun' and not samek or tsadhe as your comment would have to suggest
Given the subject matter of Dan 7 and its period of writing, one would do well to draw a line straight to Enos (KJV transliteration) which is the greek form of "Enoch" from Genesis' earliest genealogies and so forth
In 8:13 when the angel Gabriel is directly addressing the prophet Daniel, he calls him בֶּן־אָדָ֔ם ie Bar-Adam. Son of Adam, or as the synecdoche "Son of Man."
Interesting the distinction.
I wish more people would take the time to actually study these things themselves rather than relying on what others tell them. 😊
@@locophoto6881 that is a bit rude. You might have a different view which is ok. I feel you should aplogise.
@@westerncivilsation7514 From her UA-cam page:
"Talk about male stalkers..Ithis incident occured in mid-March, 2019. I homeless for more than eighteen months because I was a whistle-blower who was blackballed and then went through retaliation for over 8 years, when they did much of this. Then, for the next five months the stalkers came in person and out of the woodwork. All homosexual or transgender men who had not transitioned. They were all in drag, like Fiona Hill. All of them were giving advice on how women should behave, how to behave better... They told me what their pregnancies were like. These are real messages. I put them on You Tube. Several of them were Jewish, like Allen. All were occultist. They tried persuasion using psychology, theology, Cabalism; some sent spells and curses. They stole and they broke into my car to take my compter and the case I was working on. I have gone so many times to Law Enforcement, FBI, FCHR, OIG, unions. I have these cases. It is incredible. I am denied protection under the law, constantly.
They went after me in person. The "in person" stalking did not stop until mid- June 2019. In 2018, after I had given my documents to the Catholic Church/Clergy, which I had sent to the Russian Embassy, explaining my offer for a three year moratorium during which time no one, either clergy, politician, or regular person, would be prosecuted if they repented, came out with what was happening, made restitutions, and changed. They went after me. They refuse to discuss the real Adam an Garden story and now I understand why. The prophesy and discussion of their Thracian.Dacian Dragon roots which is found in prophesy which go back to the garden story and the Books of Daniel, Mica, and Isaiah."
Wasn't meant as rude...just letting people know that might take her input as a credible objection to the points made in the video above that this woman unfortunately is dealing with some issues that are disturbing her interpretations of well made points from well made foundations that are meant to help further the understanding of Christianity....this woman I feel is out to sabotage it from a mental issue or spiritual issue. Not sure which.
@@westerncivilsation7514 I did consider your point about being rude by the way..and thanks for bringing it to me...you're right...I was rude and I do apologize to the woman that wrote the post I replied to. I wasn't attacking her for the record, but do stand on the point that her comment that is seeking to alter what the Bible does say is very wrong and coming from a perspective very different than a casual observer of her comment would realize is happening.
When Jesus calls Himself the Son of Man, He is humbling Himself not exalting Himself. He is identifying with us as human beings. This is supported in Phillipians 2:5-7, when Paul writes - " Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. Being found in appearance as a man , He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. For this reason also, God highly exalted Him..." Jesus was not exalting Himself by using the term Son of Man, He was humbling Himself by identifying as one of us.
Do you think its more of a reference to Daniel 7 and other old testament prophecies of "one like the son of a man"? I lean more towards this view. The 1st century Jews would most likely understand the term when Jesus uses it through their knowledge of the old testament prophecies. Jesus appeared to be pretty much telling them He is the one all those verses were referring to. The old testament prophecies referred to the "one like the son of man" as a most exalted mysterious figure with rulership over the whole earth. Our Lord Jesus was pretty much telling them, "I am that son of man"
@@Peter-pp2jo
What you said makes sense to me as well as the previous comment from “Bible Answers”. I don’t think this video was on the right track. One thing that sticks out to me. If the title Son of God denotes obedience to the Father then why were the fallen angels who mated with women, which caused the Nephilim, called sons of God? The title son of God appears to mean they don’t have an earthly father and we’re directly created by God but does not determine whether they are obedient or disobedient. Angels whether fallen or not would fit that definition. Adam was a son of God. Yeshua is the only Begotten son of God and He is also the 2nd Adam.
If I may provide my personal two cents.
We know from Genesis 6:4 it states "The sons of god came down to the daughters of men " and.. .essentially defiled the human race. Which gives us the book of enoch , and the stories of the nephilim. So... during the time of Jesus, when these stories of fallen angels mating with humans were more widely accepted... There was a need to distinguish himself from the fallen angels that came down before. What better way to do it than to appeal to the side of him that makes him one of us. A MAn.
A more interesting insignt I find is via the Jealousy we see in Satan towards Mankind. And How in the bible, God often refers to men and their nations as "Virgins" or "Whores." So clearly, we can see the type of relationship God wishes to have with humanity. It is that of a husband and wife relationship. A Marriage. Where the husband goes out and makes money, the wife stays in the house, and cares for the house and the children. Here we can see if God is the husband . Man is the wife. Then Jesus is BOTH, Son of God and Son of Man. However, it is clearly up to him, by which parent he chooses to refer himself too. God marries Mankind and has a Son. Son bene ha Adam.
I know its the same thing you stated. but I wanted to give you extra biblical answers lol
@@fivebooks8498 "Yea when you see one who is not born of a woman...prostrate,, he is your God.. "
cant rememeber where that verse is from... but i think its in the gospel of thomas and interestingly also one of the sayings of the Buddha.
Always boggled my mind, but ..... Something to do with Adam...not being born from a woman. And something about Adam........... and the Fall...and the story of Sata...there is Something about ...Adam.....
Jesus meant it as a reference to Daniel as he quotes the Daniel verse here:
"I am," said Jesus, "and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power and coming with the clouds of heaven." (Mark 14:62)
Thank you so much
nicely explain
the guy is wrong about "son of god" being loyal to the father because the Gen6 "sons of god" defiled earth women which the Father forbid. Another example, Adam was a "son of god" but he wasn't loyal.
Context is essential when understanding the Bible.
No master here, just saying.
@@exnihilo2601 I concur with your "context" remark. Seems to me that a lot of christians seem to make theological claims based on a verse or 2, and without regard to the context surrounding the verse. It's a fallacy called "cherry picking".
@Andrê Visser Genesis 6:2 "the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. "
Genesis 6:4 "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days-and also afterward-when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them...."
So I infer that before Noah, before Seth, there were many "sons of god" who defiled human women.
There were also other sons of god. Luke 3:38: "Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God".
So Adam was also a son of god. And Adam defied the father by eating the forbidden fruit.
So there's plenty of bible accounts that "sons of god" defied god. That means that RC Sproul claim that "son of god" is divine must be false.
Sorry!
@Andrê Visser Interesting theory sir. Please expand your view. Is there any scripture indicating that "ONLY Adam" was to be son of god?
If your claim is true and Adam was intended to be the "only", then can you explain why the Father created other "sons of god" described in Genesis 6?
And Job 2 refers to "sons of god" who presented themselves to the LORD, along with Satan. This seems to imply that Satan is one of the "sons of god".
JOhn 1:12-13 seems to indicate that Jesus gave people the right to become "children of god" which also seems to contradict your "only Adam" claim.
Looks to me that there are lots and lots of sons of god.
@@baubljos103 Joe it doesnt deserve to be a theory , rather a very wayward idea. Eve not counted. The time will come when all on earth will be Gods sons and daughters. Rev 21:7
The name Adam in hebrew means MAN. Son of MAN, Son of Adam. Much easier to understand than this guy's explanation.
Thank you 🙏
Wow! Thank you!
Good word.
Awesome! Thanks.
The truth may be quite different.
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
Thank you
I'm no expert, but putting the dots together seems to bring to an interesting conclusion, analogous to one I myself have come up in other fields of life: that of the "communion" between humility and presumption.
I'll try to explain myself: as RC says in the last bit of the video, Jesus is actually claiming authority, so in a way that could be called "presumption" (but remove all negative aspects of the word we culturally associate with it, I'm not a native english speaker thus I don't currently know a better word to use, so I use this one and with I simply mean the following: knowing the positive sides of the position you claim to hold, knowing it's possibilities and what good it may bring. One has to remember that this word then is dependant on the point of view, on the standards in society, and so on. On the other hand, by "humility" I mean aknowledging the negative sides that come up with the position you claim to hold, or in this context the non-exclusivity of this position).
On the other hand, there's the phrase "you are the son of whom you obey" seems to imply that anybody can then be the Son of God, or the Son of Man and both at the same time: this could be called "humility" because it is an aknowledgement that you are not holding an exclusive position: as I said this facts are relative to a society which is imbued with evil and thus makes it seem like being so close to God is somehting exclusive and unaccessible, while if we all would accept "The Way of Things" we could live a better life all under God and at his side at the same time.
The point in trying to surpass God is that it is useless and also a contradiction: doing that would not bring upon who tries God's Wrath, but just a series of consequences that would make it seem like that: we have a need to translate our ideas and intuitions into words, but as many phylosophers said, we can get tricked by our own words, and trapped by them. For example, by picturing God as a king, we humanize God and thus with time fall under the false sensation that God may be a tyrant enforcing his rule, and thus fall prey to a series of self-fueling actions that only achieve getting further and further from God, somewhat like falling down, or better, giving up in reaching the peak of a mountain one is trying to climb.
Everything seems to point to the fact that we have the freedom of trying to get as near as God as we want, and also the freedom to sin: since all sins can be forgiven when one truly gets back on his way to God. So, as must be always remembered, God is actually there, although life situations may make it difficult to reach or see God, one can somehow always get back on the road to God. Instead, sinning is getting further from God, and that can be momentarily. Then compeltely giving up into sin is the decision of staying far from God, or worse the decision of getting further and further. And also that can always be reversed, but maybe the further from God, the harder is the way back. That is because pure evil doesn't exist, it lays there at infinity and thus however closer one tries to get to infinity, it will always be infinitely far from where one is.
The reason why pure evil doesn't exist, is that evil is a synonim of destruction, and so pure evil would be pure destruction, so what is pure destruction? Nothing. Literally, not a region of space devoid of matter, but a region of pure nothing. How could one ever achieve, then, pure nothing? It's impossible, even after destroying everything, one would be met with chaos all around him, but not nothing, and still even if one managed to reach nothing, that one would need to still be there. Basically, I'm just stating with different words that the state of complete inexistance is just contradictory and thus just a word we use that doesn't describe any reality.
As I said, God instead is there. And so much so that one can be there where God is too. We could say, that then one would be in harmony with everything, and thus God.
Often when talking of such stuff the way our words and logic works creates rotating loops: picture a vortex in a fluid that moves forward, and that movement is reality, while still rotating in on itself, and that rotation is "fictitious". If you know some maths and physics, check out the cycloid curve for motion in a bycycle: depending on different factors, it could be that a point that is moving forward momentarily also moves backwards, seeming to loose ground. That is what happens with words, the true meaning comes through but only while also rotating almost as if repeating itself.
One last thing: I think this pictures of thrones and kings is not appropriate to our current society: we now picture rulers as something that should not exist, almost like tyrants. That's probably another reason why today many misunderstand the messages of the Bible and Jusus and God. We are a bit closer to a better world then before, but with words we risk to refuse the guidelines to it!
I really needed this long "exhale" of my ideas. I hope what I tried to say comes through clear enough!
Please, if you don't like something, try to think about what I said with a lot of fantasy in your head, the way some words make me thing might not be the way the same words make you feel, and so it may seem we're not sharing the same idea, and instead we are. Also, with my words I'm just trying to make a picture of some of my ideas and intuitions, not absolute truths or anyting certain, so what I wrote should be read like if watching a very abstract painting, or read like if listening to a very free symphony that tries to convey certain feelings and images with its notes
thank you
Excellent
I like the radio because it gave me the world!!
I speak through the experiences that I have had on this world and in higher regions. Jesus (Yasuah) has been my personal guide and teacher in a real sense. Every time that he appeared in a vision it was as a brother possessing human elements and the communication style of a teacher/ friend I have also been in the LIGHT/LOVE. Jesus showed us the path to true sonship by wholeheartedly choosing the WILL of GOD without any reservations or conditions. This choice should be made when you are in spirit (trance) with the conscious mind disengaged of circumvented. From that moment the untested created spirit sets upon the path to sonship ( through the narrow gate) and up the mountain that is composed of service to others NOT SERVATUDE but providing strength to those family members who are wavering. The focus of sonship must always be on selfless giving the essential nature of God. If the focus is on receiving and selfishness the service is to the deceiver dark side. It is what lies within the heart as your intention not necessarily an action. This nation has been deceived by the deception of the dark side. I was shown in a vision that there are very few willing to go through the narrow gate and the vast majority are following the golden road of deception being led by the trump.
I love his voice...
In the Targum Ezekiel it is translated as Son of Adam. I find that telling since the lineage of Jesus through Mary foes all the way back to Son of Adam, Son of God.
I think it might be more properly translated in the NT as Son of Adam.
Except 'Son of Adam' would definitely be less correct as a NT rendering.
A'dam is used in the OT to denote the actual first man, named Adam', but also IN MORE PLACES used primarily to refer to all mankind ie all Adam's offspring. Most often this is translated in English versions as "man" or "mankind" or "humankind"
Example:
GEN 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
_A'dam_ is the Hebrew in all three instances of 'man' there.
Son of Man in the NT is υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου which is Son of "anthropos". There is a way to write 'Adam' in the Greek but "anthropos" is not it. It is rather: Ἀδὰμ (eg Luke 3:38)
Anthropos in Greek means humankind (general "man") EDIT so υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου which means son of ἀνθρώπου is rightly rendered "Son of man"
Cheers
At 0:28, this gentlemen is referring to the Council of Chalcedon in 451AD, which a council of the Catholic Church to oppose both Nestorianism and Monophysitism. It firmly declared that Christ had two distinct natures: one human and one divine.
Wasn't Ezekiel also referred to as son of man, multiple times? Is Ezekiel also the lord of the Sabbath? Please explain. I am confused.
Here's a simple breakdown:
Son of Man - equal to mankind.
Son of God - equal to God.
son of man - descendant of Adam (man)
sons of God (Old Testament) - angels
sons of God (New Testament) - adopted believers and angels.
Matt24:4-5 For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Annointed,’ and will deceive many.
Thank you Grandad.
why was the term jesus "the only begotten son of god" from the gospel of john chap 3 verse 16 was removed from the revised standard version of the bible?
Because it is a corrupt satanic Bible that doesn't follow the true orthodox canon.
The difference simply depends upon which aspect of jesus you were to refer to or even that he was referring to when speaking of himself. There was jesus as the physical manifestation of Gods word and there is jesus the spiritual being.
Awesome I miss RC
Muy bueno
ÀMEN. PROCLAME THE TESTIMONY OF GOD BLESS.
There's a lot to take in especially if you consider the Sproul's commentary on the commentary. 😇
Son, refers to one that is in obedience, or who is in accord with a greater. Man, in Son of Man, emphasizes the descending of Christ into the world that He may judge the world, whom He has authority over,
If any one has a better clarification, please reply below.
@letters79587 You're right! Christ is from God, and amongst the witness over his people. Earlier prophets were all Obedient to God and Sons of Man (Adam, first), didn't gave them the authority to be called upon/worshipped.
Like, David is from God in Psalm 2:7 ESV I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you.
David is Christ's elder brother then, literally
All the glory to the Lord our God!
Please come Lord Jesus our Savior!
It is simply put, he has many crowns .
The angel of the Lord in the OT has very similar roles as messiah in NT.
Translation Ben Enosh from the Aramaic in the book of Daniel referring specifically to the one who will come on the clouds.
Quite so!
The Son of Man was a title Jesus used to show that he was fully human. This was necessary to be Adam's EQUAL in human perfection. This is so that Jesus could die in Adam's place and release the human family to enjoy everlasting life on earth as God purposed. (Romans 5:12,18, John 3:16).
Daniel in his prophecy calls the angel who was chosen for this mission as 'someone like a son of man'.
Daniel 7:13 “I kept watching in the visions of the night, and look! with the clouds of the heavens, SOMEONE LIKE A SON OF MAN was coming; and he gained access to the Ancient of Days (namely God), and they (the other angels) brought him up close before that One. 14 And to him there were given rulership, honor, and a kingdom, that the peoples, nations, and language groups should all serve him. His rulership is an everlasting rulership that will not pass away, and his kingdom will not be destroyed.
Jesus thus identified himself with the one spoken of in Daniel's prophecy.
One who is a true god, is also a true teacher, is also a true parent, is also a true child , is also a true scientist, is also a true artist, is also a true judge. Ironically , if we search and replace the word, "true", with the word, "false", in the above statement, the resulting statement will still be just as true.
So what's the difference?
I've just listened to several discussions from theologians concerning the meaning of "Son of Man." RC's is the best.
The account is found at Daniel 7:13,14.
An ANGEL is chosen to be the son of man. Namely, Jesus.
Hence the term Son of God too (cf Job 1:6).
With respect. No ne can have the best explanation. Either it is accurate or false.
@@tongakhan230 - There is no mention of any angel in Daniel 7. Sorry. It's just not there.
@@rubiks6 : Daniel sees a vision of an event taking place in heaven.
The angels bring one of their own into the presence of God. God then confers on this CHOSEN ANGEL rulership and stuff (Daniel 7:13,14).
If This isn't about angels who else is WITH God in heaven?
Remember Paul writing,
'To WHICH of the ANGELS did God say...' - Hebrews 1:5,13.
Jesus' words may help.
John 8:23 He went on to say to them: “You are from the realms below; I AM FROM THE REALMS ABOVE. You are from this world; I AM NOT FROM THIS WORLD.
@@tongakhan230 - Angels are not mentioned in Daniel 7. Sorry. They’re just not there.
But can you not answer the most important, significant question of all? How many angels CAN dance on the head of a pin?
This makes sense 👍👍
I'm still confused and would appreciate some help. I'm reading Ezekiel and noting that the Lord addresses the prophet Ezekiel as Son of Man as well. (And aren't all Christian men sons of God?)
Amen I was actually just looking through the comments because I wanted to ask the same thing. If it is a highly exalted title, in what manner are we to take it when it is applied to Ezekiel?
@Mozinwrath Could you be more clear? I'm trying to understand. But the simple question is, if the title "son of man" is a high and lofty title pointing to his deity, then why is Ezekiel also called "son of man"?
@Mozinwrath Thank you, Mozinwrath! I must admit though that I would like to second John Andrade's follow up.
(I should also correct myself in saying that Ezekiel is "son of man" in my translation and not "Son of Man")
Yes I agree with the 7 replies, On earth he was just a perfect "man". He himself made that clear at John 8: 40. Also Paul at Romans 5:15, 1 Tum 2:5
@@joostsmits1178 Agreed but not a Godman
Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.
God had no son god create Adam as also without father or mother there is no other god except one allah allah have no partner Mohammad esha as prophet messenger of allah so pray to allah not jesus beleive in akhirat after the dead judgement day ok accept islam more information read Qur'an first
One other note of interest here, Jesus and Ezekiel are the only two people in the Bible referred to as "son of man." Also, God laid iniquities upon both of them. Jesus, "Upon Him, He laid the iniquities of us all." Ezekiel, Chapter four, the iniquity of Israel and the iniquity of Judah, each for a specific number of days to stand for a specific number of years, were laid upon Ezekiel. There was no suggestion of divinity in Ezekiel's case, just a bearing of iniquity.
Daniel called son of Man (8:17). "So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision." Num 23:19 Job 25:6 Job 35:8 Psa 8:4 Psa 80:17 Psa 144:3 Psa 146:3 Isa 51:12 Isa 56:2 Jer 49:18 Jer 49:33 Jer 50:40 Jer 51:43 all reference son of Man.
www.blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=%22Son+of+Man%22&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0_1