Solutions to Problem 199

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @AdityaKumar-gd5oy
    @AdityaKumar-gd5oy 28 днів тому +15

    When I saw thumbnail I was shocked who was she ???😂😂😂

  • @jdubruyn
    @jdubruyn 28 днів тому

    Apologies for not answering Prof🙏Breaks my heart that time is just too little for me to learn from scratch right now.. Will keep watching at first before I try again. Thank you Keith for the solution(s) #Legend

  • @Victor_hehe
    @Victor_hehe 28 днів тому +1

    I am in 10th standard and Sir 😊
    You are my inspiration ❤️
    You actually made my love physics

  • @AyanHaider_5mdcat
    @AyanHaider_5mdcat 28 днів тому

    Thank u sir g I need it❤

  • @maas0146
    @maas0146 28 днів тому

    I am lot respect for you sir 🙏

  • @jaygray1001
    @jaygray1001 28 днів тому

    I ❤ you and all your teachings. Gravity has no other energy to balance it correct? The correct angles, toroidal, magnetics, and quantum physics will be the answer to gravity. Vera Ruben proved Newtonian Mechanics doesn't work. If I could spend a few hours with you, I could only imagine how much new discoveries would be found. Quantum tunneling, space time and time space. These concepts will play a huge piece in the future. Thank You.

  • @gaurav9290
    @gaurav9290 28 днів тому +1

    Hello Walter Lewin, my physics teacher teaches us physics in a really bad way that we all get bored. At first I thought it was my problem but soon after some time I realised I am interested in physics when I study by my own. Nevertheless, our teacher expects our solution should match to his methods, he doesn't do any experiments, he doesn't proof any theorem and he just forces us to cram all the formulas for exam. I love to study physics but without knowing the logic of something I cannot understand it. At last, I may ask you that what should I do, Should I study by myself and your lectures 8.02, 8.03(already watched 8.01 and loved it) or should I just cram what my teacher says.

  • @rishijadhav180
    @rishijadhav180 27 днів тому +1

    which books shall i refer to start my study in physics?

  • @user-ps4je2oh6q
    @user-ps4je2oh6q 28 днів тому

    Love from INDIA❤❤

  • @kevinyang4539
    @kevinyang4539 23 дні тому

    Sir have a good day!

  • @devi100688
    @devi100688 22 дні тому

    Nice Discussion..Sir, Misprint of Acceleration Unit.

  • @MRPES-ey8ml
    @MRPES-ey8ml 28 днів тому

    Sir

  • @kawaichanx3
    @kawaichanx3 28 днів тому

    Ma man

  • @basically-ky2rp
    @basically-ky2rp 26 днів тому

    Sir I have a question -
    A nonconducting sheet of large surface area and thickness d contains uniform charge distribution of density p. Find the electric field at a point P inside the plate, at a distance x from the central plane.[ from prof. Verma's book]
    Two answers are coming when I choose Gaussian surface as vertical cyclinder I get px/2E°
    And when I choose Gaussian surface as horizontal cylinder I get px/E°
    Please help me to solve this problem [sorry for grammatical errors]

  • @exactempire7854
    @exactempire7854 24 дні тому

    Sir, what book do you use in your 8.01 lectures and what book do you recommend for classical mechanics

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  24 дні тому

      8.01
      Physics
      Hans C. Ohanian
      Physics
      Volume 1
      2nd edition
      W.W. Norton & Company
      ISBN 0-393-95748-9
      8.02
      Physics for Scientists & Engineers by Douglas C. Giancoli.
      Prentice Hall
      Third Edition
      ISBN 0-13-021517-18
      8.03
      Vibrations and Waves by
      Anthony French
      CRC Press
      ISBN 9780748744473
      8.03
      Electromagnetic Vibrations, Waves and Radiation
      by Bekefi and Barrett.
      The MIT Press
      ISBN 0-262-52047-8

    • @exactempire7854
      @exactempire7854 24 дні тому

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 thx sir. But I intend to buy a dedicated calssical mechanics book that will serve me also in grad school and I'm eager to know you recommendation.

    • @exactempire7854
      @exactempire7854 23 дні тому

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 thx sir. But I wanna buy a dedicated classical mechanics book and I'm eager to know your recommendation.

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  23 дні тому

      @@exactempire7854 I cannot advise you as I do not know you. Ask your teachers - consider the 3 books with Feynman Lectures.

    • @exactempire7854
      @exactempire7854 23 дні тому

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 thank you very much sir.

  • @zisispontikas944
    @zisispontikas944 28 днів тому

    Units at both accelerations should be m*s^(-2) @05:13 and after

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  28 днів тому

      yes I noticed that Keith slipped up on the unit

    • @KeithandBridget
      @KeithandBridget 27 днів тому

      @@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 You have no idea how many times I have looked at that and not noticed the blindingly obvious!

  • @abhinav-ed1ui
    @abhinav-ed1ui 27 днів тому

    can someone pls tell me where i can access and attempt these problems that he refers to

    • @KeithandBridget
      @KeithandBridget 27 днів тому

      If you click on Lectures by Walter... above the comments it will go to his home page. Next to Playlists and Community is a magnifying glass icon. Type your search to the right e.g. problem 199, and press enter.

    • @abhinav-ed1ui
      @abhinav-ed1ui 26 днів тому

      @@KeithandBridget thanks a lot

  • @tirejadararjenrojda
    @tirejadararjenrojda 28 днів тому

    Hello!

  • @amanrajcreation6023
    @amanrajcreation6023 28 днів тому

    You are great teacher but less views ??

    • @contexta857
      @contexta857 28 днів тому

      Coz, people are interested in Instagram more than physic

  • @contexta857
    @contexta857 28 днів тому

    Anyone want see the real craze about there profession should come here..
    Just watch it,At the age of 85+ 😶
    I remember(physic works and i am still alive)

  • @hooya27
    @hooya27 28 днів тому

    Woot! First! Btw, where is the inflection point inside the Earth? Certainly not at the surface.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 27 днів тому

      It is at the surface, if you assume uniform density. The GPE function of radius is quadratic, and has no inflection point. At the surface, there is an abrupt change from a parabola to a hyperbola, and at that abrupt change, there is an abrupt change from positive curvature to negative curvature.
      If you account for PREM data instead of uniform density, as I explored, I found that the GPE(r) function appears to be close to a parabolic within the Earth's core, and then it becomes very close to linear within the Earth's mantle, and is tangent to the GPE at the surface, where it abruptly switches to its 1/r behavior.

  • @KeithandBridget
    @KeithandBridget 27 днів тому

    Apologies to all watching this video. As pointed out in the comments acceleration has units m*s^(-2).

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  27 днів тому

      sorry Keith; I did not view this time your video before posting it. I normally do that and will continue to do that. with my apologies

    • @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259
      @lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259  27 днів тому

      I normally also send your video to Eugen but did not do that this time.

    • @michaelbruning9361
      @michaelbruning9361 27 днів тому

      The units are also missing in the middle terms a) and c) where you insert the values.

  • @AiimsAspirant-kl5dw
    @AiimsAspirant-kl5dw 27 днів тому

    1
    I do not understand this definition. $dQ/dt$ represents the rate of CHANGE of charge flow at an instant even though current is defined as only the charge flow per unit time.
    Please clear my dought
    I am students from India preparing for neet examination

  • @micloue
    @micloue 28 днів тому +1

    Sir, I have a question. How could we construct a polynomial algorithm that determines whether an instance of problem 199 has an integer solution, assuming that P ≠ NP?

  • @KishanLovesAstro
    @KishanLovesAstro 24 дні тому +1

    Sir would you like to join a interview with me for about 10 minutes for a youtube video . Sir I wanna do this if ok can tell me ok if you can't it's ok sir.