What has Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS' ownership done for Nice? Has it been good? Is the club better off since INEOS became owners? Sam is joined by French football expert Luke Entwhistle to discuss every aspect of Ratcliffe's ownership of Nice to help Manchester United fans understand what lessons we could learn ahead of a possible INEOS takeover at Man United if the Glazers sell to them.
Neither Ineos or Qutar will get ownership, after the F A cup final the Glazers will announce hedge funds investment, you heard it here first, you youtube channels and MSM are being played
@@coreyboachie that other guy conveniently omitted the fact that the Glazers would still be at the club till 2026 at the earliest under SJR. There isn't even a guarantee that Ineos is ever buying them out. We want the Glazer's gone now!
@@almac9203 i know I’ve wanted Qatar from the second they said they were interested and it doesn’t even make sense for the club to be worth 10 billion, Ratcliffe would have to spend more money than it would cost to buy the club around 3-6 billion and then spend and additional 2 billion to get rid of the glazers after that
@@coreyboachie You're numbers are wrong. It would take Ineos £2.5b to buy 50% now, and about £1.2b to buy the A&J 20% in 2026. Total £3.7b for 70% of the shares.
@@creepingbrain you're numbers are wrong the glazers are staying becuase they think Utd will be worth 10 billion in a few years but it will only be worth that if ratcliffe spends a crazy amount to make it that way otherwise they are staying for life.
The Guardian newspaper has an article about Ineos ownership of Nice FC. In short Nice were a well run club with excellent scouting and they developed players for the first team and sold others for a profit. Ineos destroyed the good scouting and management of the club and instead of scouting and bringing in promising talent they started bringing in has-beens from the EPL. Nice FC were a top 4 club 3 out of the six years before Ineos arrived and they got worse under Ineos. The Scouting expert and coach and management departed and they were highly critical of Ineo's commitment and ownership. The atmosphere at the club was described as toxic. The Nice FC fans certainly aren't happy with Ineos. SJR announced that Nice would challenge PSG in Ligue 1 but they are currently 27 points off the pace. The Guardian newspaper said that Ineos are in it for business purposes and questioned their commitment. The newspaper also said that Ineos in addition to bidding on United had bid on Chelsea and enquired about buying Liverpool. SJR has run Nice FC as well as the Glazers have run United because he isn't a fan but a businessman.
Nice haven't won a title for 65 years. They've spent most of those 65 years in the lower half of the table or in the second division. They finished 8th & 7th in the two years before Ineos bought them.
@Alfa Kenny Buddy Nice have NEVER been in the Champions League, let alone 'every other season'... And FYI, 'top 4' doesn't even get you CL qualification in Ligue 1, only the top 3 teams qualify
@@barrywhite3647 Wasted money not invested . Investment is when experts make footballing decisions on transfers not bankers like what has been happening at MUFC for years.
@@barrywhite3647 false. France doesn't currently even have FFP rules so you are lying. FFP rules don't even come into force in June 2023 so for you to say he spent the maximum under FFP rules is simply a lie. How could he spend the maximum allowed under FFP rules over the last 4 years when such laws didn't exist?
@Al mac Because Nice play in UEFA competitions and THEY have FFP rules. And FFP doesn't just come into effect in June, it's been around for about 10 years 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Great interview. Sam has been doing hands down the best coverage of the sale since the initial announcement back in Autumn. Really appreciate all of the work that goes on behind the scenes lining up these knowledgeable guests with different opinions.
I don't care how you lads try to slice and dice it. My mind is made up, Ineos is not good for Manchester United. The alarm bells are there and we cannot afford to ignore it.
Totally agree. Sir Jim , like the Glazers , sound like they are clever businessmen but very poor at creating good structures and strategies within football clubs. They will know how to make money out of Man United but not know ( or care ) how to make Man United competitive on the pitch. This is the problem. The Glazers will make a fortune from the sale. It’s a brilliant piece of business , but it will have nothing to do with any great successes on the field.
@Red is he sitting on the fence because he is scared of the backlash from United fans? He knows that nearly 90 percent of the fan base is pro Qatar hence why he hides his true position? Even in this interview he said that Nice FC under Ineos hasn't gone up but hasn't declined which is clearly false.
People are forgetting PSG is in the Champions League every year, while nice is not. I will take Champions League over mid table. For that, INEOS is out for me.
Malaga. The Qataris bought them in 2010. They've taken them from a team doing well in the top flight, to a club that's on the brink of relegation to the third tier of Spanish football.
@@creepingbrain dude you are simply a liar and a lazy liar at that. According to you Malaga were a team doing well in the top flight of Spanish football whereas the truth is the club had been in and out of the first division throughout its existence. You make it sound like this team is Real Madrid when it clearly was not. They had survived relegation by a mere one point before the takeover so your description that they were doing well in the top flight of Spanish football is total fantasy
Correct me if am wrong but according to what I have heard about Nince I have a bad feeling about Sir Jim it feels like united will become more of a mid table club that a champio
All the information provided by Luke fills me with fear concerning an INEOS takeover. We need a new owner who is going to come in and do it right first time, not employ a scattergun approach. That, coupled with yesterdays lunchtime video, all roads lead to Sheikh Jassim. Luke was fantastic btw 👍👍👍
@@Parky_1712 If he has the means and will to employ people who will manage the day to day business of the club properly instead of someone who owns a club which is very badly managed albeit being way better BEFORE he arrived then yes.
Why would ANY United supporter want a Chelsea supporter to buy their club? There's a direct conflict of interests here, Jim Radcliffe can go watch Chelsea and leave United in peace. First thing he might do is try to transfer Rashford to Chelsea on the cheap. Don't him anywhere near United tbh.
According to the Guardian newspaper they said that Ineos also previously enquired about buying Liverpool. He is described as a businessman not a real fan.
@@Parky_1712 bro the guy is a billionaire who can use a helicopter to go from London to old Trafford in about 1 hour so if he’s a real fan that won’t be a problem for him.
@Ibrahim Ali Yes, the guy is a billionaire. I doubt he's that bothered about tracking back and forth to go and watch football matches... And he lives in Monaco by all accounts
Ideally, you'd want club to be owned by a fan led consortium but let's be honest we live in a world where state backed clubs and super wealth owned teams are winning the major competitions. If we want to dominate football then we have to get someone like Qatar. The fact that Sheikh Jassim is MUFC fan and wants to involve ex-players and fans gives me hope with the Qatari takeover. After watching yesterday's UCL match between Madrid and City, I think Qataris are the best option we have to reach that level otherwise we may as well start calling ourselves a mid-table former great club.
Real Madrid are supporter owned. We have similar revenues to Real Madrid. We've spent more than Real Madrid on players. We have a similar wage bill to Real Madrid.
@@creepingbrain R M is the model we should follow, not Qutar, was in total dissaray a few years ago, totally restructured, generally buy young talent, no waste money like MUFC, the only real mistake they made recently is Hazzard, and offload there older players, or one's with injury records, Casemiro and Varane to MUFC and invest in young talent, a lot to be learnt from their role model
@@AbdurRahman0410 I'm painfully aware of that. And that drain on our resources has stopped us being able to invest in infrastructure. Still, we have a similar wage bill to Real Madrid. We've spent more on players than Real Madrid in the last decade. We have a higher wage bill than City. We've spent more on players than City in the last decade. We've spent really really badly, and made terrible managerial appointments. As SJR said about us a few years ago, we're the dumb money.
The last time Nice were in the europa league under RATcliffe they finished bottom of their group which isn't necessarily bad until you factor in there was an Israeli team in their group, so he promised fans they will compete with PSG when they can't even beat Israeli teams and seeing as PSG has been in a champions league final this decade this shows that Qatar is already a better choice than RATcliffe. And look at the teams they have lost to since 2020 in the ucl: Bayern 2x, man city and real madrid so they don't get easy ties and when they do they normally win.
I remember looking at Nice last summer season and even though all signings the signings was questionable joe Bryan and sorenson really stood because they are championship quality at best any rightful owner wouldn’t of signed those deals off
If Sir Jim takes Man Utd, the club will be relegated within 3 years. Remember that Glazers staying will mean only money and nothing to do with the progress of the club and will make it very difficult for Sir Jim to operate under such a model. It is like someone is there to take a profit without investing it.
I was saying this yesterday but some fans wanted to say the manager shouldn't have a say in what players are signed but more on the system . That's poppycock! The manager is needed in the decision for players . I was told I was being bias to ineos but no if Qatar are like that , it's not good too! Both have positives and negatives but I'd be more for Qatar . I'm sure ineos will have their benefits but for me, at the moment I am more then leaning to Qatar but looking forward to your video on Qatar Sam 👏🏿 good work as always
If Sir Jim comes in, it will be a fiasco like we have never seen. This Glazers and this guy bringing in cycling management. I can just see Ten Hag dealing with this. Its farcical. This video has come across as a complete Sir Jim in
@@almac9203 do UTD fans know this ?? Because they are quick to jump on Qatars human rights etc. But money at the top is never clean. J P Morgan owned shares that they sold to the Leeches and they employed Jeffrey Epstein and knew all about his heinous activity 😆😆 It’s a case of take your pick, the best of a bad bunch.
@@archetypesmith9435 people jump on Qatar all the time for human rights record but Manchester United itself has been sponsored by Saudi Arabia since 2008. Saudi Arabia has an even worse human rights record than Qatar and has tortured and murdered journalists and started an illegal war and sponsors terrorist groups. Ineos has a factory in Saudi Arabia so in a way it supports the regime. Manchester United and Ineos hands aren't any cleaner than Qatar. Since no one is 100 percent pure I am going to support the guy that will wipe out the debt and 100 percent remove the Glazers and build a stadium and improve the squad and have said they are in it to restore glory to the club and don't care about profits. Qatar are a dream owner and we would be lucky to have them replace the incompetent greedy Glazers!
I am a United fan that lives in Switzerland, but do not support Lausanne. From my outside view some baffling decisions by the owners led to the relegation of LS to the second division.
Wake up,if you really think Qutar will let Ten Hag get on with his project, think again, the will want glamour signings like Neymar, Mbappe, trophy signatures, who cause trouble just like Ronaldo did
PSG literally just said that they won’t be buying these big players and instead looking for young talented players and I think they learnt from their mistakes. Also I can imagine ETH telling them the players he wants.
Man Utd under ETH is a different beast and if the Qatari's win, they will use more of the Man city model with Pep where ETH will handle on pitch matters and players and work with Dof for transfers they agree on !Everything else including development,sponsorship and business side will be handled by the owners!
we are forgetting if the preferred bidder is sir jim then he would still have the glazers on board. this isn't a straight buyout. in my opinion we would be in a far worse place in this situation than we are now. we do not want "dual ownership" of Manchester united
If people watch this and still want Jimmy Glazer Rat, they are not United fan..the fact that every Rival fan are begging for Ineos Jimmy Rat to buy United says it all
In sorry not putting nice down but United is a different beast all together the kind of money that needs spending on us he just can't afford he's borrowing money just to buy half of United so where's the other 4 billion coming from just to get us on our feet again never mind what it's going to cost to build our team up to be on par with city , Newcastle and chelsea ???
Why do you want to buy mun with borrowed money. Someone has the cash, and the Glazers are playing Mickley mouse game. The supporters are also not doing their part by keeping the pressure on to get rid of the Glazers.
Ratcliffe only bring more problems to our club , he is no good for us , we need Jassim , look at Manchester City . Arab money is the best .this is our club , we need to bring the best players in the world , and a better manager , the presente one is no good , and De Gear need to be sent back to Spain on the next flight . One way ticket .
Rat...cliffe has provided over decline wherever he has gone. Sky were the most succesful cycling team, but Ineos are now 4th. Nice were well-run, but now are a failed French Galactico experiment. Rat....cliffe backed Brexit...then moved operations out of the UK, into the EU. He's worse than the Glazers, and would have to borrow to buy the club. He tried to buy Chelsea, but couldn't get it done. He is a Michael Knighton...without the humour.
I think nice from ligue 1 are doing great under jim Ratcliffe aka the owner but he will make Man Utd worse if he buys the club this will cost the red devils the greatest wins and summer signings
I'm not kidding, if Rat or Cliff whatever he's called buys United I'm moving over to City immediately! I don't care the names I'm called, you're even more insane as a fan if you support this Ineos madness
Sheikh jassim said he’s a private investor and it’s not state owned and also ineos are a business that will want their money back that they invested and that money will come out from the club.
@Ibrahim Ali Oh, so because Sheikh Jassim said it's not part of the state, that makes it true then? 🙄 And how exactly would Ineos be able to get the money they invest, out of the club??
@@Parky_1712 Aint that the same thing with SJR? We don't know if what he is saying is true too. And how he would take money from the club? I think we already had an example in Glazer
@@reika307 What has Ratcliffe been saying? And Ineos are going to own the club for 50 years, and take money out, to make up the 3+ billion (at least) they'll be putting in??
Is brailsford not a cheat his time at sky ended in controversy and what does he know about football no wonder its not going well at these clubs owned by ineos be no better than woodward or Arnold
Taking 3 to 4 years to Employ Compentent people I'm footballing positions in a football club...VERY POOR IMO. That's the NO 1 PRIORITY IN ANY BUSINESS EMPLOY BEST IN CLASS. NOT IMPRESSED with what I heard.
@scottfarrell1906 after 3 to 4 years that's a MASSIVE RED FLAG AND CONCERN. No disrespect to NICE FC but if he can't Run them efficiently as a FOOTBALL CLUB AND INSTITUTION... HOW the f*** will they run arguably ONE of the THREE BIGGEST CLUBS IN WORLD FOOTBALL????
And Qutar will, no they will interfere and want who they want, liability players like Mbappe, Neymar as signature signings who cause trouble just like Ronaldo
@richyclubsport5155 one thing I will say about the Qataris is they won't NEED LOANS and will clear the debt. On th3 other hand I don't know but there is evidence in the video above about SNAKCLIFFE'S CLEAR INCOMEPTENCE AS A FOOTBALL CLUB OWNER. FACT.
What has Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS' ownership done for Nice? Has it been good? Is the club better off since INEOS became owners?
Sam is joined by French football expert Luke Entwhistle to discuss every aspect of Ratcliffe's ownership of Nice to help Manchester United fans understand what lessons we could learn ahead of a possible INEOS takeover at Man United if the Glazers sell to them.
Neither Ineos or Qutar will get ownership, after the F A cup final the Glazers will announce hedge funds investment, you heard it here first, you youtube channels and MSM are being played
His ex wife alicia is lebanese british not italian.
As a french United fan, i can talk about nice in france, its a real mess....i hope ineos wont be the next owners of united, same as glazers style...
@samwize28you answered your own fucking question 😂😂😂that won’t happen and why are you comparing him to the glazers and not Qatar 😂😂
@@coreyboachie that other guy conveniently omitted the fact that the Glazers would still be at the club till 2026 at the earliest under SJR. There isn't even a guarantee that Ineos is ever buying them out. We want the Glazer's gone now!
@@almac9203 i know I’ve wanted Qatar from the second they said they were interested and it doesn’t even make sense for the club to be worth 10 billion, Ratcliffe would have to spend more money than it would cost to buy the club around 3-6 billion and then spend and additional 2 billion to get rid of the glazers after that
@@coreyboachie You're numbers are wrong. It would take Ineos £2.5b to buy 50% now, and about £1.2b to buy the A&J 20% in 2026. Total £3.7b for 70% of the shares.
@@creepingbrain you're numbers are wrong the glazers are staying becuase they think Utd will be worth 10 billion in a few years but it will only be worth that if ratcliffe spends a crazy amount to make it that way otherwise they are staying for life.
The Guardian newspaper has an article about Ineos ownership of Nice FC. In short Nice were a well run club with excellent scouting and they developed players for the first team and sold others for a profit. Ineos destroyed the good scouting and management of the club and instead of scouting and bringing in promising talent they started bringing in has-beens from the EPL. Nice FC were a top 4 club 3 out of the six years before Ineos arrived and they got worse under Ineos. The Scouting expert and coach and management departed and they were highly critical of Ineo's commitment and ownership. The atmosphere at the club was described as toxic. The Nice FC fans certainly aren't happy with Ineos. SJR announced that Nice would challenge PSG in Ligue 1 but they are currently 27 points off the pace. The Guardian newspaper said that Ineos are in it for business purposes and questioned their commitment. The newspaper also said that Ineos in addition to bidding on United had bid on Chelsea and enquired about buying Liverpool. SJR has run Nice FC as well as the Glazers have run United because he isn't a fan but a businessman.
I'm not sure why we are not doing more to expose Ineos and its management expertise.
@@ishadowmarshall282
Brit agenda, would rather talk about the Middle East than their own
@ishadowmarshall282 it's against the narrative of the bias, xenophobic British press to expose the flaws of the 🐀.
NICE were competing for Ligue 1 title and finishing in Champions League every other season but INEOS takeover destroyed that club completely.
Nice haven't won a title for 65 years. They've spent most of those 65 years in the lower half of the table or in the second division. They finished 8th & 7th in the two years before Ineos bought them.
Ineos were competing for the Ligue 1 title but Ineos takeover destroyed the club?
Make that one make sense...
@@creepingbrain They were in Champions Leagues before INEOS. Finishing in Top4 every other season. Before PSG they used to be title contenders.
@@Parky_1712 Typo mistake.
@Alfa Kenny Buddy Nice have NEVER been in the Champions League, let alone 'every other season'...
And FYI, 'top 4' doesn't even get you CL qualification in Ligue 1, only the top 3 teams qualify
Short version. Bought the club. Got rid of the experts doing well. Hasn't invested enough. Club in the doldrums.
invested all he can with ffp
Reminds me of the Glazers.
@@barrywhite3647 Wasted money not invested . Investment is when experts make footballing decisions on transfers not bankers like what has been happening at MUFC for years.
@@barrywhite3647 false. France doesn't currently even have FFP rules so you are lying. FFP rules don't even come into force in June 2023 so for you to say he spent the maximum under FFP rules is simply a lie. How could he spend the maximum allowed under FFP rules over the last 4 years when such laws didn't exist?
@Al mac Because Nice play in UEFA competitions and THEY have FFP rules. And FFP doesn't just come into effect in June, it's been around for about 10 years 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Great interview. Sam has been doing hands down the best coverage of the sale since the initial announcement back in Autumn. Really appreciate all of the work that goes on behind the scenes lining up these knowledgeable guests with different opinions.
I don't care how you lads try to slice and dice it. My mind is made up, Ineos is not good for Manchester United. The alarm bells are there and we cannot afford to ignore it.
So basically Ineos/SJR have provided funding and signings but management has been poor… no thanks
It’s basically glazers 2.0
Based on this info, SJR would be the Glazers 2.0.
Lack of planning, scattergun approach to recruitment and wrong infrastructure appointments.
Totally agree. Sir Jim , like the Glazers , sound like they are clever businessmen but very poor at creating good structures and strategies within football clubs. They will know how to make money out of Man United but not know ( or care ) how to make Man United competitive on the pitch. This is the problem. The Glazers will make a fortune from the sale. It’s a brilliant piece of business , but it will have nothing to do with any great successes on the field.
This is the sort of video that is top class. Provides so much context, great interview and good info! Top content 🙌🏻
Come on Sam, deep down I feel you want Ratcliffe as Owner! British Media helping the Rat-cliffe bid! Every other team is against Qatar owning United!
💯 this, ask the supporters of the club they are incredibly unhappy.
@Scott Farrell This guy in the video literally just told you how Nice fans are in no way 'incredibly unhappy' 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I knew he's a pro Jim since day one, even when reports said RATcliff is keeping the Glazers he talked about conspiracy theories! Lol
@Red is he sitting on the fence because he is scared of the backlash from United fans? He knows that nearly 90 percent of the fan base is pro Qatar hence why he hides his true position? Even in this interview he said that Nice FC under Ineos hasn't gone up but hasn't declined which is clearly false.
People are forgetting PSG is in the Champions League every year, while nice is not. I will take Champions League over mid table.
For that, INEOS is out for me.
Nice FC are 27 points behind PSG! This guy told Nice FC fans that they would be challenging PSG but they aren't challenging nothing!
Malaga. The Qataris bought them in 2010. They've taken them from a team doing well in the top flight, to a club that's on the brink of relegation to the third tier of Spanish football.
Nice used to play in Champions league before INEOS took over
@@kennyalpha22 🤦♂️🤦♂️ Nice have NEVER played in the Champions League...
@@creepingbrain dude you are simply a liar and a lazy liar at that. According to you Malaga were a team doing well in the top flight of Spanish football whereas the truth is the club had been in and out of the first division throughout its existence. You make it sound like this team is Real Madrid when it clearly was not. They had survived relegation by a mere one point before the takeover so your description that they were doing well in the top flight of Spanish football is total fantasy
Correct me if am wrong but according to what I have heard about Nince I have a bad feeling about Sir Jim it feels like united will become more of a mid table club that a champio
He can’t even compete in the French league so how will he compete in the premier league with all these other clubs.
All the information provided by Luke fills me with fear concerning an INEOS takeover. We need a new owner who is going to come in and do it right first time, not employ a scattergun approach. That, coupled with yesterdays lunchtime video, all roads lead to Sheikh Jassim. Luke was fantastic btw 👍👍👍
So a man with absolutely ZERO experience in running a football club (Sheikh Jassim) is going to just come in and get everything right first time?
@@Parky_1712 United fans ended up with "choice your preferred poison"
@Reika Yeah, and it should really be the one we have a modicum of information about
@@Parky_1712 sheikh Mansour never had any experience of running a football team before buying man city. So what's your point😊
@@Parky_1712 If he has the means and will to employ people who will manage the day to day business of the club properly instead of someone who owns a club which is very badly managed albeit being way better BEFORE he arrived then yes.
Getting Ineos and Sir Jim as owners would just be digging one hole to fill another.
Great conversation Sam. Got some insights abt INEOS, how they r running Nice. Not so much promising imo😢
Why would ANY United supporter want a Chelsea supporter to buy their club? There's a direct conflict of interests here, Jim Radcliffe can go watch Chelsea and leave United in peace. First thing he might do is try to transfer Rashford to Chelsea on the cheap. Don't him anywhere near United tbh.
According to the Guardian newspaper they said that Ineos also previously enquired about buying Liverpool. He is described as a businessman not a real fan.
Don't want Qutar anywhere near Old Trafford
You act like he's in the Shed End every week 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
He has a season ticket cause his kids are Chelsea fans...
@@Parky_1712 bro the guy is a billionaire who can use a helicopter to go from London to old Trafford in about 1 hour so if he’s a real fan that won’t be a problem for him.
@Ibrahim Ali Yes, the guy is a billionaire. I doubt he's that bothered about tracking back and forth to go and watch football matches...
And he lives in Monaco by all accounts
Ideally, you'd want club to be owned by a fan led consortium but let's be honest we live in a world where state backed clubs and super wealth owned teams are winning the major competitions. If we want to dominate football then we have to get someone like Qatar. The fact that Sheikh Jassim is MUFC fan and wants to involve ex-players and fans gives me hope with the Qatari takeover. After watching yesterday's UCL match between Madrid and City, I think Qataris are the best option we have to reach that level otherwise we may as well start calling ourselves a mid-table former great club.
Real Madrid are supporter owned. We have similar revenues to Real Madrid. We've spent more than Real Madrid on players. We have a similar wage bill to Real Madrid.
@@creepingbrain they didn't have the glazers running them and sucking them dry
@@creepingbrain R M is the model we should follow, not Qutar, was in total dissaray a few years ago, totally restructured, generally buy young talent, no waste money like MUFC, the only real mistake they made recently is Hazzard, and offload there older players, or one's with injury records, Casemiro and Varane to MUFC and invest in young talent, a lot to be learnt from their role model
@@AbdurRahman0410 Exactly, and with the Glazer's gone, that won't be a problem anymore
@@AbdurRahman0410 I'm painfully aware of that. And that drain on our resources has stopped us being able to invest in infrastructure. Still, we have a similar wage bill to Real Madrid. We've spent more on players than Real Madrid in the last decade. We have a higher wage bill than City. We've spent more on players than City in the last decade. We've spent really really badly, and made terrible managerial appointments. As SJR said about us a few years ago, we're the dumb money.
Great insight Sam.....Sounds like it's a slow burner to me. PSG next, yes!?
Rat out with the glazers
The last time Nice were in the europa league under RATcliffe they finished bottom of their group which isn't necessarily bad until you factor in there was an Israeli team in their group, so he promised fans they will compete with PSG when they can't even beat Israeli teams and seeing as PSG has been in a champions league final this decade this shows that Qatar is already a better choice than RATcliffe. And look at the teams they have lost to since 2020 in the ucl: Bayern 2x, man city and real madrid so they don't get easy ties and when they do they normally win.
Do you mean Turkish group?
@@decks5982 no europa league
I'm 76 and a Utd fan all my life.
If Degea gets a contract with the I will take a year off.
He is so poor and has no bravery.
A show pony. 😢
Degea will be no. 2..
Sam , respect to you and your team, for what you are putting on your channel. outstanding thank you.
I remember looking at Nice last summer season and even though all signings the signings was questionable joe Bryan and sorenson really stood because they are championship quality at best any rightful owner wouldn’t of signed those deals off
Superb video Sam. Very informative, thanks 🙂
We need wealth. Wealth is health organic grow are for the 80es sir Jim need to go by a Swindon
If Sir Jim takes Man Utd, the club will be relegated within 3 years. Remember that Glazers staying will mean only money and nothing to do with the progress of the club and will make it very difficult for Sir Jim to operate under such a model. It is like someone is there to take a profit without investing it.
Say no to Jim Glazer
I was saying this yesterday but some fans wanted to say the manager shouldn't have a say in what players are signed but more on the system . That's poppycock! The manager is needed in the decision for players . I was told I was being bias to ineos but no if Qatar are like that , it's not good too! Both have positives and negatives but I'd be more for Qatar .
I'm sure ineos will have their benefits but for me, at the moment I am more then leaning to Qatar but looking forward to your video on Qatar Sam 👏🏿 good work as always
Preferring Jim the rat to Sheik Jassim is like picking Susan Boyle over Beyonce
Glaziers and Ratcliffe out
Revisiting this!
Good Lord !! what a shambles. El Thani please
Get up off ur knees
If Sir Jim comes in, it will be a fiasco like we have never seen. This Glazers and this guy bringing in cycling management. I can just see Ten Hag dealing with this. Its farcical. This video has come across as a complete Sir Jim in
You mean out surely?
No 😔 I feel this is trying to come across as a soft sell for Sir Jim. The cycling guy was at the meeting with the glazers in March
Sounds no better than the Glazers ownership ffs 😂😂😂😂😂. I should be angry but I can’t stop laughing…JIM THE RAT IS GLAZERS 2.0 🙈
Funny that Sky TV never cover Ineos ownership of Nice FC or Ineo's environmental scandals.
@@almac9203 do UTD fans know this ?? Because they are quick to jump on Qatars human rights etc.
But money at the top is never clean. J P Morgan owned shares that they sold to the Leeches and they employed Jeffrey Epstein and knew all about his heinous activity 😆😆
It’s a case of take your pick, the best of a bad bunch.
@@archetypesmith9435 people jump on Qatar all the time for human rights record but Manchester United itself has been sponsored by Saudi Arabia since 2008. Saudi Arabia has an even worse human rights record than Qatar and has tortured and murdered journalists and started an illegal war and sponsors terrorist groups. Ineos has a factory in Saudi Arabia so in a way it supports the regime. Manchester United and Ineos hands aren't any cleaner than Qatar. Since no one is 100 percent pure I am going to support the guy that will wipe out the debt and 100 percent remove the Glazers and build a stadium and improve the squad and have said they are in it to restore glory to the club and don't care about profits. Qatar are a dream owner and we would be lucky to have them replace the incompetent greedy Glazers!
Brilliant video Sam!! thank you!
I am a United fan that lives in Switzerland, but do not support Lausanne. From my outside view some baffling decisions by the owners led to the relegation of LS to the second division.
Wake up,if you really think Qutar will let Ten Hag get on with his project, think again, the will want glamour signings like Neymar, Mbappe, trophy signatures, who cause trouble just like Ronaldo did
PSG literally just said that they won’t be buying these big players and instead looking for young talented players and I think they learnt from their mistakes. Also I can imagine ETH telling them the players he wants.
@@IbrahimAli-po1hd as if they will listen, they will want big names signature signings to massage their big ego's
Man Utd under ETH is a different beast and if the Qatari's win, they will use more of the Man city model with Pep where ETH will handle on pitch matters and players and work with Dof for transfers they agree on !Everything else including development,sponsorship and business side will be handled by the owners!
@@goalsforgeorge9096 from what I'm hearing from excellent sources neither Ineos or Qutar will own MUFC, expect an announcement soon
@@goalsforgeorge9096 Qutar won't win
you can spend money looks like united dof needed thats the reason i do not wont sir jim
Find someone who can tell about Qatar management of PSG
Look at the Miserable meagre expenditure at NICE
Bonjour Luke ça va et merci
we are forgetting if the preferred bidder is sir jim then he would still have the glazers on board. this isn't a straight buyout. in my opinion we would be in a far worse place in this situation than we are now. we do not want "dual ownership" of Manchester united
Sounds like United being a rich mans toy under Ratcliffe.
Irony?
If people watch this and still want Jimmy Glazer Rat, they are not United fan..the fact that every Rival fan are begging for Ineos Jimmy Rat to buy United says it all
In sorry not putting nice down but United is a different beast all together the kind of money that needs spending on us he just can't afford he's borrowing money just to buy half of United so where's the other 4 billion coming from just to get us on our feet again never mind what it's going to cost to build our team up to be on par with city , Newcastle and chelsea ???
Exactly
Has Nice actually won any league trophies cups , trophies or Champions Leagues...
Well Nice are having it good in France!How about their swiss club bought by Ineos that got relegated?
It could get worse guys!
INEOS is terrible for man utd.😮
I like sam , but hear he really has an agenda that he does not want Jim ratcliffe , an interviewer should not have that.
They have not gotten there yet. Sam.
Sam falling inlove with Ineos😂😂😂😂😂
I’m disappointed with Sam I thought he was more intelligent than wanting Radcliffe for Man Utd Don’t need to listen to this channel anymore 😮😮
Why do you want to buy mun with borrowed money. Someone has the cash, and the Glazers are playing Mickley mouse game.
The supporters are also not doing their part by keeping the pressure on to get rid of the Glazers.
Ratcliffe only bring more problems to our club , he is no good for us , we need Jassim , look at Manchester City . Arab money is the best .this is our club , we need to bring the best players in the world , and a better manager , the presente one is no good , and De Gear need to be sent back to Spain on the next flight . One way ticket .
Jika sir jim jd pemilik selanjutnya akan jadi Glazer jilid ke 2
Sam did you read what Richard Keys said about Erik ten Hag ,i think it's a load of crap, what he said about him.
GUT telling me dont trust ineos etc
NICE is a midtable team and Lazaon
Any takeover news?
It will be another sh*T show if 🐀cliff gets Man Utd. The Fans should also protest against him.
Rat...cliffe has provided over decline wherever he has gone. Sky were the most succesful cycling team, but Ineos are now 4th. Nice were well-run, but now are a failed French Galactico experiment. Rat....cliffe backed Brexit...then moved operations out of the UK, into the EU. He's worse than the Glazers, and would have to borrow to buy the club. He tried to buy Chelsea, but couldn't get it done. He is a Michael Knighton...without the humour.
What's gonna be happen ??? I am shitting bricks
For balance, do a video on the Qatari ownership of Malaga.
Except that Jasim doesn't own Malaga.
For balance show me one thing in football Ineos is getting right
I think nice from ligue 1 are doing great under jim Ratcliffe aka the owner but he will make Man Utd worse if he buys the club this will cost the red devils the greatest wins and summer signings
How is he old enough to be senior anyone at anything? Journalists will be wearing school uniforms at this rate. I feel so old
Ratcliff’s in, I’m out! F*** football!! I’m done!!
SJR will bury us!
Sir Jim's Nice cannot compete with Qatar's PSG in the French league. Good luck competing with City and Newcastle in the prem.
As if Nice (a club that generates 60-70m in revenue) and United (a club that generates 600-700m in revenue) are at all comparable... 🤦♂️
Nice is not MU, that is a wrong comparison
No
I'm not kidding, if Rat or Cliff whatever he's called buys United I'm moving over to City immediately!
I don't care the names I'm called, you're even more insane as a fan if you support this Ineos madness
Shame about Ineos' intelligence. Guess we all have to go with the money instead.
Nice are 8th in the table, so the answer is no
RATCLIFFE NOT WELCOME. Keep your money. Just look at Nice.
Man United fans, welcome to Nice 😂
Nice never had the infrastructure of MUFC to begin with, Ineos is still a better bet than a State owned Qutar
Sheikh jassim said he’s a private investor and it’s not state owned and also ineos are a business that will want their money back that they invested and that money will come out from the club.
@Ibrahim Ali Oh, so because Sheikh Jassim said it's not part of the state, that makes it true then? 🙄
And how exactly would Ineos be able to get the money they invest, out of the club??
@@Parky_1712 Aint that the same thing with SJR? We don't know if what he is saying is true too.
And how he would take money from the club? I think we already had an example in Glazer
@@reika307 What has Ratcliffe been saying?
And Ineos are going to own the club for 50 years, and take money out, to make up the 3+ billion (at least) they'll be putting in??
@@IbrahimAli-po1hd LOL. 'Private investor'. Where did he make his money??? Please tell me
Is brailsford not a cheat his time at sky ended in controversy and what does he know about football no wonder its not going well at these clubs owned by ineos be no better than woodward or Arnold
Ben Jacobs dislikes!
Dont trust jim ratcliffe or the glaziers
Avoid Ineos at all cost!
Ratcliffe will be a disaster he aint got no money
Taking 3 to 4 years to Employ Compentent people I'm footballing positions in a football club...VERY POOR IMO. That's the NO 1 PRIORITY IN ANY BUSINESS EMPLOY BEST IN CLASS. NOT IMPRESSED with what I heard.
They have yet to prove they can run the club well
@scottfarrell1906 after 3 to 4 years that's a MASSIVE RED FLAG AND CONCERN. No disrespect to NICE FC but if he can't Run them efficiently as a FOOTBALL CLUB AND INSTITUTION... HOW the f*** will they run arguably ONE of the THREE BIGGEST CLUBS IN WORLD FOOTBALL????
And Qutar will, no they will interfere and want who they want, liability players like Mbappe, Neymar as signature signings who cause trouble just like Ronaldo
@richyclubsport5155 one thing I will say about the Qataris is they won't NEED LOANS and will clear the debt. On th3 other hand I don't know but there is evidence in the video above about SNAKCLIFFE'S CLEAR INCOMEPTENCE AS A FOOTBALL CLUB OWNER. FACT.
@@jeffhunter2091 and you know nothing about Qutar apart from money
Such like a absolute mess recruitment wise behind the scenes.
Jim 🐀 and glazers out now Qatar yes yes yes 💯👍👍🫷
Ineos in don't want Qutar anywhere near Old Trafford
@@richyclubsport5155 You and a few minority do.
The real United fans who want the best in class want Jasim
@@IamKenneddy ain't happening, facts