This is part of infrastructure ,infrastructure, infrastructure and China is still growing and the need for power to keep the country running in relation to the population
this is not true... all existing energy projects in Brazil were carried out with Brazil's own capital... in the future there may be some Chinese investment in this segment.
@@cheungchingtongNem isso, o Brasil aprendeu a construir suas próprias hidrelétricas lá na década de 30 e 40, com ajudinha do Tio Sam. Em plena década de 70 já estávamos construindo a gigante Itaipu com capital 100% nacional e tecnologia local também, quando a China sequer sonhava em fazer obras dessa magnitude. Os chineses nos ajudaram bastante na popularização da tecnologia solar, já que eles produzem em larga escala e bem barato, acessível para muitos países poderem comprar.
@@edneydenis7856 I just did some researching, China did send engineers to help Brazil on renovating its already existed hydropower stations, Ilia and Jubia are the names I think, so yeah, Brazil did build those, China does the modern renovation. Thank you for your info anyway. Cheers.
There are no engineering works in the energy sector under Chinese supervision, nor hydroelectric plants and not even in the thermal power plants sector... we also have three (3) nuclear plants here in Brazil that were purchased from Germany in the 70s... therefore we do not have any Chinese influence in the energy sector
@@SunriseLAW In the 80's the US had like 330 twh, present day less than 250. They are in fact declining in terms of hydro. But I get your drift and often that is the case - other countries are developing.
It's the stagnation which comes from thinking "you're the best" and don't have to work to stay there, it's just like electric vehicles, solar panels distribution and wind turbines, China is grasping opportunities with both hands and prospering from that.
It is so shocking to know that even Norway was producing more hydro power than India despite I dia having abundance of rivers. And around 2006 China hydro piwer production increases sharply because that year the Three Gorges Dam was opened.
Hydroelectric power generation requires suitable geographical conditions. The Norwegian terrain is well suited for dams, and precipitation is high. Most parts of India are plains and are not suitable for hydroelectric power generation.
You must take into account the number of dams collapsed faster than they can build 😂. The reasons are rat holes, heavy rains,, etc etc and but never about shoddy work and corrupt officials from the states.
In india if a government plans to make a dam, sometimes it will take to complete more than 20 years .... Not because of corruption , the reason is bureaucracy and environmentalists...... Its not about india every democracy problem
Thank you for the support Jack. I really appreciate the kindness in you. you are the very first person to do "super thanks" keep the kindness jack. I hope I can do better for you one day in the future.
China has used up all the low hanging fruits in hydropower resources. The new fields are solar and wind. China has a lot of dry land and cheap solar panels.
To sum up, as a Chinese, China has developed 90% of the water resources that can be developed, and there will be no growth in hydropower generation in the future. In the future, the main focus will be on the growth of solar energy and other forms of power generation (China has a large area of Gobi that can accommodate solar panels).~
? Not true. Large vertical drops still left to build on upper rivers off Tibet Plateau. China has about ~65% of its hydropower built. Rest requires more time to fill in the reservoirs. Actually Gobi is a bad place for solar. Tibet is superior and so is Taklaman desert.
It was really low at that time.I was born in 1998.When I should be two or three years old, our village can use electricity on a large scale.Not only for countries outside China, but also for Chinese people, China's development speed is too fast.In 2000, most of the houses in our village were mud houses.As a result, in less than ten years, our village has completed the transformation of old houses, and all the people live in new houses.The village has also been connected to running water, and the dirt roads in the village have become hardened roads.Now, in 20 years, almost every household in the village has a car.When I was a few years old, my father's bicycle was the property of the family.My father bought me a bicycle worth ten dollars, which can meet the envy of others.As a result, every family is now rich, and this is not an example, but a common phenomenon.
Why is Scotland not on this list? It pioneered hydro power, but it's England and Wales that benefit. Electricity prices are high in Scotland, because the electricity generated by wind and water power there props up electricity gobbling England.
Again, China won this race. Hydro is large, measured by TWh here, solar and wind just don't compare, and it is clean renewable. However, countries must have water resources to have hydro. Tibetan plateau high altitude locked in fresh water in its glaciers. China has a water monopoly in that part of world. If China wants to build more dams for hydro, river down streams to India, Bangladesh would be cutoff and agriculture lifelline would be cutoff.
Canada could, if it wanted to, supply the world with hyrdo power, it's basically powering half of the U.S., the main reason China has such a lead is because of its huge population - it needs it, Canada and U.S., and all other countries aren't going to build hydro dams for a population that doesn't exist.
Russia, Canada, United States, China and Brazil are the top 5 countries in the world by land area. They have the rivers to build hydropower. Only country missing is Australia which is the 6th largest country in the world.
@@Bk6346lol it’s not the land mass that matters in measuring hydro power potential. It is the altitude difference. If you talk about rivers. There’s hundreds of thousands of rivers all over the world. Even smallest countries have rivers. Please make sense here pal
Which ones? Only three Brazil, Canada and the US and they all have huge territories and abundance of rivers to generate hydro power. Still their combined generation is less than that of China's. Duh.
@@epicnicity916 The designers of the Olympic flag agreed with you. One ring represents the Americas. But you think the Olympic flag still has too many rings, I suppose? One is for Europe, one for Asia.
Brazil could be a powerful country if it didn't have a hard history. Every data Brazil start behind and has your improvement. Since 2015, a poor Brazilian can study in the college. It wiil have a good and visible consequence 15 or 20 years from now.
Rwpublic and liberal democracy damaged Brazil. Even more when we took Portugal's huge ass debt with the rotchilds to become "independent" from them, destroying the empire. What a great idea. Being in debt with the rotchilds so we can install a liberal democracy that the US and Europe controls.
No, because the introduction of new capacities does not depend on the population or other energy sources. It is purely dependent on the geography of the country. I think a more appropriate indicator is the % of used capacity from all potentially available.
@@kulichkun8709 i agree that this heavily depends on country geography.. and water sources aka rivers.. in our country we have many water dams for electricity generation and the country size.. we use also gas.. but that is mostly used in companies which have their own powerplants.. and almost dont use the network.. we are heavy on nuclear as % of mix.. by heavy i mean more than half production.. than is water.. we have one unique with 700+MW output and can store almost 4GWh of capacity.. sorry its only in slovak... sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%8Cierny_V%C3%A1h_(vodn%C3%A1_n%C3%A1dr%C5%BE) this is the real hard core gravitational battery.. now the world talks about such things we have 40+ years doing it job here..
I'll look at the power generated, or the "profit" generated and who is ultimately benefited by these hydro-power. Is the people of the country, or a small number of people? For the case in China, I believe that it will be the whole world: Cheap power go to manufacturing of all kinds of products that is sold all over the world.
What happened to entry for Russia? Think you should be able to breakout Russia and USSR so as to correctly reflect their hydroelectric production earlier in timeline. In 2022, Russia generated around 202 terawatt-hours of hydroelectric power. PS - nice representation of growth of hydropower
Hold on a minute hydro power is fantastic great clean energy when done well but you can only rank these nations based also on a ratio of NG output by amount of rainfall and precipitation that each nation has each year overtime Otherwise it’s a nonsense graph measuring the wrong thing and making it look like something else Australia for example where I’m residing has very low rainfall compared to the rest of the world we have a little bit of hydro as we have some mountains but guess what? Our highest mountain is 7000 feet only and we don’t get a lot of rain. So if it’s measured that way and you reference it, I’ll believe it a little bit more but at the moment it’s a nonsense graph
I kinda predicted the charts except Canada. Canada of cos is a big country but are there a lot of rivers? I'm feeling ignorant. Brazil is b'cos of lacking in money and tech for large infrastructure. US have no interest in infrastructure in general, and probably also b'cos of the oil companies.
An important factor is whether there's land around a suitable river that's not severely inappropriate to flood in order to create a reservoir. Canada was lucky to have nearly uninhabitable land in northern Quebec. The province worked around concerns about a few thousand residents and bird populations.
To control flooding, there is also the issue of drought.I live in one of the southernmost provinces of China.We have too much water here.And because of the rainy season.Floods often break out here.If there were no hydropower stations to regulate water, there would be flooded land everywhere.Moreover, in the dry winter and spring, hydropower stations can release water to alleviate water pressure.
At less than 1 TWh per million people it remains well behind many other countries. Still, I'm glad they have adequate electricity. Now if they can start burning far less coal, planet Earth can breathe better. (Not gonna happen.)
@@dixonpinfold2582 Most of the pollutants in the air now are emitted by developed countries such as the United States and Europe over the past century, which is the main cause of environmental problems, not developing countries such as China and India.
@@aison2735 Yep, white derangement syndrome. They're so awful that other races can actually do no wrong, ever. Other races have licence to do anything bad for the rest of all time, because whatever they do it could never compare with the original sin of being white.🙄Yeah, sure.
US still has some native fish stock preserved. China has far more mountains and further prospects are phenomenal if upstream Bhramaputra 2000m drop is any example.
It is why China *has BY FAR the largest numbers of EVs ON THE PLANET - MORE THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED - and charging all those millions and millions AND MILLIONS OF EVs IN CHINA IS NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER FOR CHINA..........*
when you see the title ,you already know the video end with which country.
😂
Absolutely 💯agree 😊
Yes, China has a large population that needs clean energy to generate electricity
@ just because one party system will not allow they break the promises .they can not blame to other party
It’s not that other countries don’t increase. It’s china’s speed outruns by a mile 😂
USA hasn't changed much throughout the whole of this video.
@ it’s a bit sad to see that ngl
It needs to. Their population is more than 3 times larger than USA's.
Murika sat on its hands, that's why they can't have nice things.
I think it was entirely attributed to the Three Gorges Dam
每年新增森林面积第一，
拥有最先进的清洁能源技术、水电、风电以及电动汽车
中国致力于保护地球环境
Respect 👍🏻
确实。但水电有点靠天赋资源。印度次大陆海风吹到青藏高原就留在冰川上了。亚洲很多河流起源于此，也是古老文明的起源。
"I build for China. China will grow larger...."
中國就是你那種會把所有遊戲都精通的朋友，一點點嫉妒，但跟他一起玩真的好爽
你这么一说还真挺有道理
We should start calling these series of comparison videos "the rise of a new superpower"
Undoubtedly, China is threat to the national security of The Almighty US of A.
This is part of infrastructure ,infrastructure, infrastructure and China is still growing and the need for power to keep the country running in relation to the population
China always comes out from nowhere😊😊
Lot of Brazil’s hydro power projects are done by Chinese companies
this is not true... all existing energy projects in Brazil were carried out with Brazil's own capital... in the future there may be some Chinese investment in this segment.
@@altentic8616 I think he/she meant technologically?
@@cheungchingtongNem isso, o Brasil aprendeu a construir suas próprias hidrelétricas lá na década de 30 e 40, com ajudinha do Tio Sam. Em plena década de 70 já estávamos construindo a gigante Itaipu com capital 100% nacional e tecnologia local também, quando a China sequer sonhava em fazer obras dessa magnitude. Os chineses nos ajudaram bastante na popularização da tecnologia solar, já que eles produzem em larga escala e bem barato, acessível para muitos países poderem comprar.
@@edneydenis7856 I just did some researching, China did send engineers to help Brazil on renovating its already existed hydropower stations, Ilia and Jubia are the names I think, so yeah, Brazil did build those, China does the modern renovation.
Thank you for your info anyway. Cheers.
There are no engineering works in the energy sector under Chinese supervision, nor hydroelectric plants and not even in the thermal power plants sector... we also have three (3) nuclear plants here in Brazil that were purchased from Germany in the 70s... therefore we do not have any Chinese influence in the energy sector
The US always starts at the top on these sorts of video and then steadily falls. Such a shame.
what is more shameful is the US does not try to do more and better but tries every dirty trick possible to slow down others.
Not really. It is just other nations catching up to our lifestyle (which requires more energy)
@@SunriseLAW In the 80's the US had like 330 twh, present day less than 250. They are in fact declining in terms of hydro. But I get your drift and often that is the case - other countries are developing.
And it will become even worse. The Stone Age is welcoming the US
It's the stagnation which comes from thinking "you're the best" and don't have to work to stay there, it's just like electric vehicles, solar panels distribution and wind turbines, China is grasping opportunities with both hands and prospering from that.
All that clean energy flowing down from the Tibetan plateau is getting used.
China has been converting deserts to greens, which is miracle.
别忘了，中国是世界上最大的太能能发电量国家，和世界上最大的风力发电国家，世界上最大的太阳能发电面板和风力发电设备制造国家，世界上核能发电技术最先进的国家之一！
急
It is so shocking to know that even Norway was producing more hydro power than India despite I dia having abundance of rivers.
And around 2006 China hydro piwer production increases sharply because that year the Three Gorges Dam was opened.
India is world no.1 in cow-dungs power. 😂😂😂😂
Hydroelectric power generation requires suitable geographical conditions. The Norwegian terrain is well suited for dams, and precipitation is high. Most parts of India are plains and are not suitable for hydroelectric power generation.
It takes time for India to be a superpower
You must take into account the number of dams collapsed faster than they can build 😂. The reasons are rat holes, heavy rains,, etc etc and but never about shoddy work and corrupt officials from the states.
In india if a government plans to make a dam, sometimes it will take to complete more than 20 years .... Not because of corruption , the reason is bureaucracy and environmentalists...... Its not about india every democracy problem
Thanks!
Thank you for the support Jack. I really appreciate the kindness in you. you are the very first person to do "super thanks" keep the kindness jack. I hope I can do better for you one day in the future.
China China China China China China China China China China China China China China
Roses are red
Violets are blue
There’s always an Asian
That does it better than you
That's funny.
Stop racism.
true
South East Asians
China has used up all the low hanging fruits in hydropower resources. The new fields are solar and wind. China has a lot of dry land and cheap solar panels.
Where is the Soviet union?
Когда они не могут выиграть по правилам, то они начинают менять эти правила.
All these excellent videos could be titled - 'Here comes China'.
Hydro, wind and solar PV with grid batteries combined with high insulation, high efficiency and electric transportation is the future:)
To sum up, as a Chinese, China has developed 90% of the water resources that can be developed, and there will be no growth in hydropower generation in the future. In the future, the main focus will be on the growth of solar energy and other forms of power generation (China has a large area of Gobi that can accommodate solar panels).~
Don't agree with you for that 90%
我们正在把戈壁滩转换为森林
@@我w-u9r 戈壁和沙漠是两个东西，沙漠是可以重新变回森林的，但是戈壁不行，戈壁比较适合太阳能发电。~
Nope. They will double their output by 2035
? Not true. Large vertical drops still left to build on upper rivers off Tibet Plateau. China has about ~65% of its hydropower built. Rest requires more time to fill in the reservoirs. Actually Gobi is a bad place for solar. Tibet is superior and so is Taklaman desert.
and yet that Swedish girl has know idea of this, and we dont see her anymore, no comment on eletric cars. 😂 well, i guess she has grown up.
There are thousands of Chinese people planting trees, grass and grids in the deserts...they are the real environmental warriors
She now shouts to safe Palestinians. That is her new hobby.
There are several Hydro projects under construction or planning in my hometown, total investment over $20 billion, it will completely change this land
Which country?
@@wasimTajelectricals6039 Shaanxi Province, China
@@whokilledmaxliar , No yt in choina
@@SoloLevellor 煞笔
Çin Gezegenin BİRİNCİSİ ve Brezilya İKİNCİSİ. HARİKA - Brezilya 🇧🇷 AMERİKA'nın ilkidir.
I knew it. China is always Numba WAN.
2000,
China, may i join the game?
Countries with vast territory and rivers as well as large population have the incentive to build hydro power plants.
This chart is all over the place. Soviet Union was missing and China’s number was too low pre-2000
It was really low at that time.I was born in 1998.When I should be two or three years old, our village can use electricity on a large scale.Not only for countries outside China, but also for Chinese people, China's development speed is too fast.In 2000, most of the houses in our village were mud houses.As a result, in less than ten years, our village has completed the transformation of old houses, and all the people live in new houses.The village has also been connected to running water, and the dirt roads in the village have become hardened roads.Now, in 20 years, almost every household in the village has a car.When I was a few years old, my father's bicycle was the property of the family.My father bought me a bicycle worth ten dollars, which can meet the envy of others.As a result, every family is now rich, and this is not an example, but a common phenomenon.
I would love to see war spending by countries
Why is Scotland not on this list? It pioneered hydro power, but it's England and Wales that benefit. Electricity prices are high in Scotland, because the electricity generated by wind and water power there props up electricity gobbling
England.
According to the surveyors Canada has still 1.400.000 TWh of untapped potential for Hydro.
The future is murky on that. Canada won't give you a permit for a toolshed, let alone a hydroelectric installation.😠 It's a dam disgrace.(😄)
Too remote. Transmissions are costly
@ not for the Chinese apparently
Gargantuan amount of coastal BC and Quebec, but will be impossible or nearly so.
@@w8stral all of the protection and no development there.
where is the data come from?
Eurasian ❤
Again, China won this race. Hydro is large, measured by TWh here, solar and wind just don't compare, and it is clean renewable. However, countries must have water resources to have hydro. Tibetan plateau high altitude locked in fresh water in its glaciers. China has a water monopoly in that part of world. If China wants to build more dams for hydro, river down streams to India, Bangladesh would be cutoff and agriculture lifelline would be cutoff.
india number one
Canada could, if it wanted to, supply the world with hyrdo power, it's basically powering half of the U.S., the main reason China has such a lead is because of its huge population - it needs it, Canada and U.S., and all other countries aren't going to build hydro dams for a population that doesn't exist.
Russia, Canada, United States, China and Brazil are the top 5 countries in the world by land area. They have the rivers to build hydropower. Only country missing is Australia which is the 6th largest country in the world.
@@Bk6346lol it’s not the land mass that matters in measuring hydro power potential. It is the altitude difference. If you talk about rivers. There’s hundreds of thousands of rivers all over the world. Even smallest countries have rivers. Please make sense here pal
Is it Terawatt
The countries on the american continent are the ones that use this the most.
Which ones? Only three Brazil, Canada and the US and they all have huge territories and abundance of rivers to generate hydro power. Still their combined generation is less than that of China's. Duh.
*continents
@@dixonpinfold2582America is only one continent, but it has subdivisions
@@epicnicity916 The designers of the Olympic flag agreed with you. One ring represents the Americas. But you think the Olympic flag still has too many rings, I suppose? One is for Europe, one for Asia.
@@dixonpinfold2582 The rings in the Olympic flag represent Oceania, Europe, Africa, America and Asia
Brazil could be a powerful country if it didn't have a hard history. Every data Brazil start behind and has your improvement.
Since 2015, a poor Brazilian can study in the college. It wiil have a good and visible consequence 15 or 20 years from now.
Exatamente
Rwpublic and liberal democracy damaged Brazil. Even more when we took Portugal's huge ass debt with the rotchilds to become "independent" from them, destroying the empire.
What a great idea. Being in debt with the rotchilds so we can install a liberal democracy that the US and Europe controls.
You mean if Brazil government was not trash...
2003's extreme environmentalists regime, RIP USA
China wild
Much better comparison would be per person... or as a percentage of power mix... absolute numbers are interesting but dont show all the picture..
Useless criteria. Power generated = cheap power to dominate world. Simple as that.
No, because the introduction of new capacities does not depend on the population or other energy sources. It is purely dependent on the geography of the country. I think a more appropriate indicator is the % of used capacity from all potentially available.
@@kulichkun8709 i agree that this heavily depends on country geography.. and water sources aka rivers.. in our country we have many water dams for electricity generation and the country size.. we use also gas.. but that is mostly used in companies which have their own powerplants.. and almost dont use the network.. we are heavy on nuclear as % of mix.. by heavy i mean more than half production.. than is water.. we have one unique with 700+MW output and can store almost 4GWh of capacity.. sorry its only in slovak... sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%8Cierny_V%C3%A1h_(vodn%C3%A1_n%C3%A1dr%C5%BE) this is the real hard core gravitational battery.. now the world talks about such things we have 40+ years doing it job here..
Didn't realize Hydro was that big in US and Canada.
Bigger in China
@JinJiaLat-vl1oj obviously. China leads the way.
Wait till your see the solar power chart!
Китай - ПЕРВЫЙ на Планете, а Бразилия - ВТОРАЯ. ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНО - Бразилия 🇧🇷 - первая здесь, в АМЕРИКЕ.
Canada was never lower than third place at any time.
Let me guess: China dwarf everyone 😂
I'll look at the power generated, or the "profit" generated and who is ultimately benefited by these hydro-power. Is the people of the country, or a small number of people? For the case in China, I believe that it will be the whole world: Cheap power go to manufacturing of all kinds of products that is sold all over the world.
Canada：Something ran past……
🇧🇷🚀
VIVA O BRICS
Não.
@@lagarttemido sim
hello 21st century
Literally every stats video - starts with USA, ends with China on top (by a huuuuuuuuuge margin)
What happened to entry for Russia? Think you should be able to breakout Russia and USSR so as to correctly reflect their hydroelectric production earlier in timeline.
In 2022, Russia generated around 202 terawatt-hours of hydroelectric power.
PS - nice representation of growth of hydropower
What do you mean by Russia and Germany until 1991? There was Soviet Union and 2 Germanies
i know it, i know it. china right?
UK come on more hydro
Watts per capita is what really matters, making Norway exceptional.
Iceland is more impressive than Norway
China have the same population with india btw 😂
China still beats USA by that measure. Oh no, overcapacity.
NS, small population make it easy to build damn, also norway is very big related to its ppl , and also lots of lakes and waterways,
The whole norway is just a small village on the edge of europe
Hold on a minute hydro power is fantastic great clean energy when done well but you can only rank these nations based also on a ratio of NG output by amount of rainfall and precipitation that each nation has each year overtime
Otherwise it’s a nonsense graph measuring the wrong thing and making it look like something else
Australia for example where I’m residing has very low rainfall compared to the rest of the world we have a little bit of hydro as we have some mountains but guess what? Our highest mountain is 7000 feet only and we don’t get a lot of rain.
So if it’s measured that way and you reference it, I’ll believe it a little bit more but at the moment it’s a nonsense graph
Nepal has potential but no knowhow nor funds.
BC Hydro just start new dams this month produce new power again.Edmonton power talk build nuclear plant very soon.😊
It's great, but at about 5 TWh annually it will raise Canada's hydroelectric output only by just over 1%.
@dixonpinfold2582 yes,agree long way go still most nwt,yukon and nunavut still use old grid systems and old genset diesel.thanks
चीन पृथ्वी पर पहले स्थान पर है और ब्राज़ील दूसरे स्थान पर। बढ़िया - ब्राज़ील 🇧🇷 यहाँ अमेरिका में पहले स्थान पर है।
中国特色社会主义接班人奋勇前进
Where is the Soviet Union? I think this vid is wrong.
All this kind of videos are watch like a game of guess "What year China will become number 1?". But the end it's never in doubt.
I kinda predicted the charts except Canada. Canada of cos is a big country but are there a lot of rivers? I'm feeling ignorant. Brazil is b'cos of lacking in money and tech for large infrastructure. US have no interest in infrastructure in general, and probably also b'cos of the oil companies.
An important factor is whether there's land around a suitable river that's not severely inappropriate to flood in order to create a reservoir. Canada was lucky to have nearly uninhabitable land in northern Quebec. The province worked around concerns about a few thousand residents and bird populations.
Eli🎉❤👋👍👈
False. USSR???
why are building so many hydro power stations?
China: Yes, thank you!😂
To control flooding, there is also the issue of drought.I live in one of the southernmost provinces of China.We have too much water here.And because of the rainy season.Floods often break out here.If there were no hydropower stations to regulate water, there would be flooded land everywhere.Moreover, in the dry winter and spring, hydropower stations can release water to alleviate water pressure.
China keeps pace with the world
At less than 1 TWh per million people it remains well behind many other countries. Still, I'm glad they have adequate electricity. Now if they can start burning far less coal, planet Earth can breathe better. (Not gonna happen.)
@@dixonpinfold2582 Most of the pollutants in the air now are emitted by developed countries such as the United States and Europe over the past century, which is the main cause of environmental problems, not developing countries such as China and India.
@@aison2735 Yep, white derangement syndrome. They're so awful that other races can actually do no wrong, ever. Other races have licence to do anything bad for the rest of all time, because whatever they do it could never compare with the original sin of being white.🙄Yeah, sure.
US still has some native fish stock preserved. China has far more mountains and further prospects are phenomenal if upstream Bhramaputra 2000m drop is any example.
at 5:18 overcapacity started
It is why China *has BY FAR the largest numbers of EVs ON THE PLANET - MORE THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED - and charging all those millions and millions AND MILLIONS OF EVs IN CHINA IS NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER FOR CHINA..........*
Автор откуда появилась россия в 1984 году😂😂😂 вообщето был СССР
Both China and India are developing countries.
Please, DO NOT put China and Endia in the same sentence. Thank you.
india superpower no1
@@sickg6417 SupaPowa SupaPoopa
@dypolo11
LKY : China and india are not in the same breath
@@sealtraderTotally 💯agree
🇨🇳♥️
الصين هي الأولى على هذا الكوكب والبرازيل هي الثانية. عظيم - البرازيل 🇧🇷 هي الأولى هنا في أمريكا.
La Chine est le PREMIER sur la planète et le Brésil le DEUXIÈME. SUPER - Le Brésil 🇧🇷 est le premier ici en AMÉRIQUE.
中國是地球上第一，巴西第二。太棒了 - 巴西🇧🇷是美國的第一個。
Only after 2014, India started producing Hydro electric power. Jai Modi. Jai Sriram
0:43 modi godi stop lie 🙏
How dare you say that? In 2014 India produced 134TWH. In 2024 it's 149. What are you India doing all these 10 years? Are you sleeping?
India still struggling to build toilets
Dados ERRADOS 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
中国：老子疯起来，拦都拦不住
Bla bla bla...
U la la