Micro Hydropower : Turbulent Turbines

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 бер 2021
  • Hydropower has been with us for millennia, but the 20th Century race to build huge centralised hydropower dams in many parts of the world has caused untold environmental damage. Now a new micro-hydropower technology is working with the natural flow of water and wildlife rather than against it, to bring much needed constant baseload power to off grid areas in remote areas of developing nations.
    Video Transcripts available at our website
    www.justhaveathink.com
    Help support this channels independence at
    / justhaveathink
    Or with a donation via Paypal by clicking here
    www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
    You can also help keep my brain ticking over during the long hours of research and editing via the nice folks at BuyMeACoffee.com
    www.buymeacoffee.com/justhave...
    Download the Just Have a Think App from the AppStore or Google Play
    Interested in mastering and remembering the concepts that I present in my videos?
    Check out the FREE DiveDeeper mini-courses offered by the Center for Behavior and Climate. These mini-courses teach the main concepts in select JHAT videos and go beyond to help you learn additional scientific or conservation concepts. The courses are great for teachers to use or for individual learning.
    climatechange.behaviordevelop...
    Check out other UA-cam Climate Communicators
    zentouro:
    / zentouro
    Climate Adam:
    / climateadam
    Kurtis Baute:
    / scopeofscience
    Levi Hildebrand:
    / the100lh
    Simon Clark:
    / simonoxfphys
    Sarah Karver:
    / @sarahkarver
    ClimateTown:
    / @climatetown
    Jack Harries:
    / jacksgap
    Beckisphere:
    / @beckisphere
    Our Changing Climate :
    / @ourchangingclimate
    Research links
    Turbulent website
    www.turbulent.be/
    • Turbulent vortex turbi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @ravenfeeder1892
    @ravenfeeder1892 3 роки тому +445

    There are weirs for old mill waterwheels all over the UK (and presumably the rest of Europe). The waterwheels and their mills have all shut down long ago, so I was wondering if this technology could be used to repurpose this existing infrastructure. Most weirs already have salmon leaps built in and are 100+ years old, so the environmental cost is even less. Whilst all these sites will already be grid connected it could still be a way to provide extra reliable energy.

    • @b00marrows
      @b00marrows 3 роки тому +23

      literally had the same thought process when i was watching video on this over the last few years. Glad this channel also covered this.

    • @Tore_Lund
      @Tore_Lund 3 роки тому +17

      @@b00marrows There are a few YT videos on old UK mills converted to generate power, both as private installations and as community projects. The benefit is that as the waterwheel is now generating an income, it stays serviced and becomes a tourist attraction drawing business to the area too. Depending on the state of the waterwheel, it can either be as simple as fitting some pulleys to the shaft coming in through the wall, or a costly restoration of the waterway and wheel with historical accuracy.

    • @craigknight2764
      @craigknight2764 3 роки тому +30

      I've often thought the same. Here in Norfolk its pretty low land but we still have all the old weirs etc. It would be so good to have a kind of micro baseload that is always there, maybe charging up peaker batteries, and not needing to be met by other fossil means.

    • @JohnC-iv8jo
      @JohnC-iv8jo 3 роки тому +10

      @@craigknight2764 sounds like an excellent opportunity for co-operatives, green tech, positive impact investment opportunities ( potentially global for carbon trade ), with tech specific crypto thrown in ( solar coin as an example of mechanism ). frightens people though, they tend to think you are a ranting nutter when not in the presence of the choir and the councils that may potentially make money over vast periods of time from it. Well they are a bit put of if you aint female. Oh I forgot utube used to get upset about such suggestions and shadow ban etc such idea's also. At least that was the case 15 years ago. Dare you to get rich from it though, in fact I double dare you

    • @durwoodmaccool890
      @durwoodmaccool890 3 роки тому +18

      One advantage to this kind of installation would be the power produced wouldn't be competing directly with utility solar and wind, but with peaker plants. Could likely make it more attractive commercially.

  • @constructioneerful
    @constructioneerful 3 роки тому +111

    "Somewhat invigorated and keen to have another go" very nice writing😁

  • @marilynlucas5128
    @marilynlucas5128 3 роки тому +201

    The guys at Turbulent are amazing. Inspirational what they're doing with turbines! I wish them well.

    • @crcdistribution878
      @crcdistribution878 3 роки тому +4

      Agree! Turbulent is very impressive. We hope to work with them one day.

    • @terenceiutzi4003
      @terenceiutzi4003 3 роки тому

      Regardless they remove the oxygen from the water and cause vast amounts of toxic solution! And damming the water up releases vast amounts of Co2

    • @johngoldsworthy1925
      @johngoldsworthy1925 2 роки тому +3

      Turbulent is indeed making local small scale hydro power a reality. I really like the way their design provides for as little harm as possible to wildlife (fish) as it operates. A win-win.

    • @terenceiutzi4003
      @terenceiutzi4003 2 роки тому

      @@johngoldsworthy1925 yes at the most expensive cost we have ever seen and destroying our waters and enviroment well it is at it!

    • @xmysef4920
      @xmysef4920 2 роки тому +1

      @@terenceiutzi4003 But isn’t that the reason why they’re small in the first place? to avoid too much of those kinds of problems

  • @AndyFletcherX31
    @AndyFletcherX31 3 роки тому +153

    Turgo turbines are well known, the main issues are reliability and maintainability. I do wonder why so many of these installations use a single unit rather than a pair of smaller ones. If you have a single turbine and it needs maintenance then you lose all power whereas if you have more than one you can shut them down separately and the parts are smaller meaning it is more likely that the locals can handle repairs themselves without needing heavy equipment.

    • @Tore_Lund
      @Tore_Lund 3 роки тому +20

      Because of cost. Small turbines are almost as expensive, so there is really no reason to get two of half the power for redundancy.

    • @lestermarshall6501
      @lestermarshall6501 3 роки тому +18

      Actually it is better to have 3. With 2 in service, the spare is used when one of the in service units needs maintenance or repairs.
      This way you always have full power if you need it and if you need even more power, in summer say, you can put the spare online.

    • @Tore_Lund
      @Tore_Lund 3 роки тому +11

      @@lestermarshall6501 I don't know about the Thugo turbines in particular, but a Pelenton you change bearings every 3-4 years and maybe a broken bucket every 10 years?

    • @totherarf
      @totherarf 3 роки тому +29

      This is not a Turgo turbine!
      Turgo's need 15m head to become efficient and direct "jets" of water at the turbine wheel. This works by getting the whole mass of water to spin and the turbine extracts that spinning motion and adds it to the gravitic energy from the water falling through it! The revolutions of Turgo's are a magnitude higher than this too so you would expect bearing replacement to be less too!

    • @TerraPosse
      @TerraPosse 3 роки тому +5

      @@lestermarshall6501 There's a reason you don't find what you describe out in the wild. As Tore alluded to, this would make the scheme prohibitively expensive and complicated for very little to no gain. If a turbine is regularly serviced (i.e. once a year on average) than breakdowns should not be an issue. And a service on a micro-hydro turgo scheme only takes a day at most.

  • @entyropy3262
    @entyropy3262 3 роки тому +148

    This is an awesome Channel, thanks for your efforts you put into public education.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому +10

      Glad you enjoy the videos. Thanks for watching!

    • @autodidact537
      @autodidact537 3 роки тому

      @@JustHaveaThink With some rivers the seasonal water flow varies quite a bit. Wouldn't the reduced flow in summer make many rivers unsuitable?

    • @paulhellewell8762
      @paulhellewell8762 2 роки тому

      @@autodidact537 I imagine that the total and seasonal flow is part of the surveying and assessment of the waterway in question.

    • @showshowtomakefreeenergyge2426
      @showshowtomakefreeenergyge2426 Рік тому +1

      Micro hydropower is an attractive option for rural electrification in many countries because it can be implemented with little infrastructure. Turgo turbines are one type of micro hydropower turbine, and they are well known for their reliability and maintainability. However, there are some issues that need to be addressed in order to make Turgo turbines more reliable and easier to maintain.
      One issue is the design of the turbine blades. The blades are subject to wear and tear, and they must be repaired or replaced regularly. Another issue is the bearings, which need to be regularly lubricated and replaced. Finally, the generator must be regularly serviced in order to prevent damage from dirt and debris.
      With proper maintenance, Turgo turbines can provide years of reliable service. However, if they are not properly maintained, they can become unreliable and difficult to repair.

  • @lornehilton8772
    @lornehilton8772 3 роки тому +64

    Living in Manitoba, Canada with mostly hydropower and these small systems look excellent for our remote communities. Love the flexibility!

    • @Nvwheeler
      @Nvwheeler 3 роки тому +10

      I live in BC and the same can be said for our remote communities. We are fortunate in Canada to have the water resources we do. This type of power production looks very appealing for sure

    • @penguinuprighter6231
      @penguinuprighter6231 3 роки тому +2

      My uncle helped engineer many Manitoba mega dam projects in the 70s. Then worked with the natives whose lives have been affected by the same dams. Sort of a make work project.

    • @MeI-vy2ls
      @MeI-vy2ls 3 роки тому

      They make big damns not any smaller ones I thought?

    • @vitalilisau6181
      @vitalilisau6181 3 роки тому +4

      I think they will not work with ice, unlike big dam projects. Mini turbines are for hot climates.

    • @MeI-vy2ls
      @MeI-vy2ls 3 роки тому +1

      @@vitalilisau6181 how do they counter the ice then?

  • @TheMangineer
    @TheMangineer 3 роки тому +19

    This is my first time watching your channel. I love how you explain things to simply, succinctly, calmly, and without any annoying background music. Subscribed!

  • @anonanon7278
    @anonanon7278 3 роки тому +89

    "... the low rotation speed turbine blades have soft rounded edges, allowing aquatic life to pass straight through the entire system, possibly somewhat invigorated and keen to have another go ..."
    That was gold! :D

    • @mozismobile
      @mozismobile 3 роки тому +3

      the problem is how aquatic life gets back up to the top have another go... without an explicit bypass this turbine is just as effective a filter as any other setup.

    • @anonanon7278
      @anonanon7278 3 роки тому +18

      @@mozismobile The turbine is installed as a channel that is parallel to the river, so all the fish would need to do is swim back up the river and enter the turbine inlet channel again to have another go.

    • @mozismobile
      @mozismobile 3 роки тому +1

      this exact example, yes, but it wasn't clear that that's the only possible installation. It seems likely to come down to regulation and enforcement rather than mechanics.

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 3 роки тому +5

      @@mozismobile That is the only installation that has ever been even suggested. Any other setup requires different kind of turbines.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому +2

      if fish can get into the system then so can debris and silt. this thing will be silted up in no time.

  • @ThreeRunHomer
    @ThreeRunHomer 3 роки тому +65

    No reason to limit them to remote areas. Any town on a stream or river could benefit from some localized, clean energy production.

    • @lukasdolezal8245
      @lukasdolezal8245 3 роки тому +7

      100% true. I think the issue is for places connecte to grid, it may not be financially beneficial as grid power is already there and cheap currently. Solution would be to increase electricity cost (which is often hidden or not paid, like carbon tax). But even then, sadly in many places in europe electricity is subsidies by government, so even more removing the natural opportunities for these solutions. Only if people would really care and push their politicians to look at those things

    • @ThreeRunHomer
      @ThreeRunHomer 3 роки тому +2

      @@lukasdolezal8245 Electric utility companies are already investing in sustainable power. For example, my local electric company has a big field of solar panels and a large battery installation close to where I live. It’d be nice to see the companies build these water turbines as well ... varied and dispersed energy production means more resilience to disruption.

    • @simonrodriguez4685
      @simonrodriguez4685 3 роки тому +4

      Even treated water. Or for pumping water to uphill locations.
      They could also be installed to decelerate water flows.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому +4

      Very true

    • @adamlytle2615
      @adamlytle2615 3 роки тому +9

      Given that many waterways that run through urban areas already have anti-erosion measures in place (ie, concrete and metal walls), adding a string of micro turbines like this would have minimal environmental impact.

  • @alaskavaper2490
    @alaskavaper2490 3 роки тому +4

    This seems like a very good way for those people living nearby to an appropriate water resource. Great video as always, James. Thank you.

  • @ashutoshsharmash
    @ashutoshsharmash 3 роки тому +10

    It's so beautiful to see scientists apply lateral thinking to solving the energy requirements of the world, without leaving a carbon footprint ... I'm so glad I found this channel.. And I love the way, the narrator just beautifully narrates this. I find his intellectualism so soothing.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you :-) I really appreciate that feedback.

  • @haroldburrows4770
    @haroldburrows4770 3 роки тому +34

    As long as it doesn't hurt the fish it sounds jolly good

    • @parthasarathyvenkatadri
      @parthasarathyvenkatadri 3 роки тому

      They could just use nets to not let the fish go in

    • @grevberg
      @grevberg 3 роки тому +1

      That's why people who enjoy fishing use hooks made of foam rubber!

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому

      of course it hurts the fish.

    • @parthasarathyvenkatadri
      @parthasarathyvenkatadri 3 роки тому

      @Trento that is the plan both hydro power and free fish ..

    • @mryousmi9896
      @mryousmi9896 3 роки тому +3

      @@Withnail1969 look at closely the shape of blade, it touch the fishs but dont hurt them, I work in aquaculture and the pump we use to pump the fishs have the same shape

  • @bernardthedisappointedowl6938
    @bernardthedisappointedowl6938 3 роки тому +69

    Windmills and watermills - clearly pre-industrial Britain got a few things right, ^oo^

    • @chrisdaniels3929
      @chrisdaniels3929 3 роки тому +9

      There is a reason the industrial revolution kicked off with factories in North West England. It rains.
      Water power started it off.

    • @brendanwallace4661
      @brendanwallace4661 3 роки тому +4

      And the fertile crescent where windmills have been used for thousands of years

    • @seankuhn6633
      @seankuhn6633 3 роки тому

      Clearly your old generations Far more stupid than your gluttonous egos would Ever allow to be concievied

    • @tombombadil3185
      @tombombadil3185 3 роки тому

      @So'FUk'NTiReD OfBarelygetnBy LOL, Texas come to mind?

    • @lestermarshall6501
      @lestermarshall6501 3 роки тому +8

      @So'FUk'NTiReD OfBarelygetnBy windmills in North Dakota are winterized to prevent that.

  • @Goreuncle
    @Goreuncle 3 роки тому +10

    I always find it ridiculous when people claim that the full potential of hydro power has been reached.
    As I see it, we have barely begun.

    • @johnbanka9199
      @johnbanka9199 3 роки тому

      These turbines do not achieve the full potential of hydro power, as you put it. They are very inefficient in their use of water. Under drought conditions, they might not be able to function properly.

  • @cleaterose5914
    @cleaterose5914 3 роки тому +1

    Dual sport riding in Vietnam, I noticed boats with outboards tied along the shore with a wire running from the outboard to a nearby house or hut. When I inquired about this, we pulled over to one of these huts advertising "cold bia". The owner took us down to the river where the outboard was off but the prop was turning in the current. The alternator was providing current to a battery which in turn powered a refrigerator full of cold beverages. He produced a product that thirsty dual sporters want and that helped support his family. Plus, he still has a boat to do portaging work. Micro hydro at it's best.

    • @JohnSmith-yv6eq
      @JohnSmith-yv6eq 2 роки тому

      If that outboard motor was turning/freewheeling (the motor not running under it's own power) so the alternator on the top of the crankshaft could producee electric current...he is wearing the engine out.
      This is a very viable system if the engine is inboard and has an alternator driven off the propshaft...just put the gearbox in neutral and let the prop spin ....

  • @willbrown4389
    @willbrown4389 3 роки тому +1

    This is brilliant! I'm a first year Environmental Science student and seeing tech like this inspires me, making me excited to work on R&D projects

  • @geoffevans7915
    @geoffevans7915 2 роки тому +3

    This is very impressive. As a civil engineer I have found that rather than using bespoke designs for each site it’s best to have a range of modular designs for different situations, for example levels and flow rates, and then make shutters and/or fibreglass formers to suit and impellers to fit. In other words a standard range of repeatable kits.

  • @joewright099
    @joewright099 3 роки тому +4

    love these, plan to make one soon!

  • @TerreHauteRemoteGoat
    @TerreHauteRemoteGoat 3 роки тому +2

    Love it! I'd been following these guys for years, but was still a little skeptical. Your video pushed me over the edge and now I'm totally enthusiastic for this technology.

  • @rickemmet1104
    @rickemmet1104 3 роки тому

    Hello David, I've been wanting to watch this for weeks, and just got around to it. This is great content! When these turbines were first introduced, they looked amazing, but your coverage of them is far better than anything I've seen before (even from Turbulent) and it is indeed compelling. With time and hundreds of installations, they may be able to produce several "standard" units of various outputs that can be more or less plug-and-play. Thanks for producing this vid!

  • @snowstrobe
    @snowstrobe 3 роки тому +34

    Have to admit I've spent way too many hours thinking about something exactly like this, yet my lack of understanding of water flow dynamics and basic engineering limited my ideas somewhat. So brilliant that some clever bods have done this. Be good if they had a funding (pay-it-forward) system in place so others could help remote communities get these in place.

    • @paintedwings74
      @paintedwings74 3 роки тому +1

      Me too! I had in mind a system of vanes moved back and forth by turbulence, but again, great that engineers have produced the functional version. Pay-it-forward systems are ideal, there are some NGO's focused on that sort of funding.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому +1

      a turbine in flowing water isnt exactly a new idea.

    • @snowstrobe
      @snowstrobe 3 роки тому

      @@Withnail1969 Yeah, I know... it's just that there might be better ways to do it.
      But thanks for that.

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому

      @@snowstrobe That's OK. There aren't really any better ways to do it.

    • @snowstrobe
      @snowstrobe 3 роки тому +1

      @@Withnail1969 Did you even watch this report?

  • @maximianocoelho4496
    @maximianocoelho4496 3 роки тому +5

    Good power output
    Easily installed
    Relatively cheap
    And Doubles as a Fish Water Park.
    If there is one here in Portugal I am gonna visit the place if I have the time.

  • @TheOdizeo
    @TheOdizeo 3 роки тому +1

    A-MA-ZING Channel Dave. Wish I could express myself half as well as you do. You truly inspire me. I'm currently doing a Master of Engineering in Sustainable Energy, so I'm stoked to have found you. I'll stop rambling now. Thanks so much

  • @Yanquetino
    @Yanquetino 3 роки тому +2

    Always makes my week when I see these videos posted. I'll wait to watch it and comment until it appears in my Patreon feed.

  • @donutemptycircle8717
    @donutemptycircle8717 3 роки тому +11

    As we struggle to deal with centuries of criminal negligence, nature quietly gets on with taking care of business. Nature does not care that it is the extinction business.

  • @nonewherelistens1906
    @nonewherelistens1906 3 роки тому +18

    Non-dam solutions can even be imagined on larger rivers, servicing a much bigger population grouping. We just need the political will.

    • @mlenox
      @mlenox 3 роки тому

      No dam systems on larger rivers are not viable. You must have SOME drop from inlet to outlet. I believe he said minimum 1.5 m. Energy output is directly proportional to that drop. More drop more power. No drop, no power.

    • @nonewherelistens1906
      @nonewherelistens1906 3 роки тому

      @@mlenox You need to get out more.

  • @dmaze8457
    @dmaze8457 3 роки тому +2

    Go Have A Think
    is one of the most understandable, well presented, food for thought, cutting edge, channels on the web. I stumbled onto it while looking for science related topics. Stumble no more. I know where to go in order to know now. Hope the presenter stays on for a good long time. He’d make a great science teacher.

    • @arenyashar6264
      @arenyashar6264 3 роки тому

      Just stumbled across this channel, myself. Between this fellow, Isaac Arthur, and a bit of Kurzgesagt, I have my science fix pretty much in hand at this point. :)

  • @ka_okai9
    @ka_okai9 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing. Thanks for sharing this , friend!

  • @vishwasdeshmukh3999
    @vishwasdeshmukh3999 3 роки тому +3

    Amazing content 🎊

  • @hair2050
    @hair2050 3 роки тому +3

    Somewhat invigorated🤣🤣🤣. That gave me a good chuckle 🤭

  • @yasserfuad6988
    @yasserfuad6988 3 роки тому +1

    That is why I don't miss any of your videos and keep checking every couple of days of any new videos
    I am thankful for your effort and I consider myself a student of yours

  • @murbella7
    @murbella7 3 роки тому +1

    I remember seeing a report about this technology at least 12 months ago. I wondered how it has progressed since and if it is being used anywhere so was pleased to see that it is being used.

  • @ElElGato1947Gato
    @ElElGato1947Gato 3 роки тому +5

    Glad you mentioned the cost to human life that the mega dams incur. In India whole communities just simply disappear. Government builds these hydroelectric dams, no plans for relocation of the displaced populace. People just have to leave the homes their families have occupied for generations & try to survive elsewhere. The human cost is horrific.

  • @erstwhilegrubstake
    @erstwhilegrubstake 3 роки тому +20

    Diesel: It's also carcinogenic.

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 3 роки тому +1

      In lots of those out of way areas it is also hard to get, which increases price. And you are lucky if you just have to pay little extra as transport cost to the guy who brings it to your village in soda bottles on back of an old motorcycle, he might also cut the product by adding water or something else so he has more product to sell, which you'll find out when that crap breaks your engine...

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому

      Allegedly.

    • @AnalystPrime
      @AnalystPrime 3 роки тому +1

      @@Withnail1969 Check out this video about poppy farmers going solar explicitly because getting fuel for their water pumps is too troublesome and fixing those pumps when there is water in the fuel is even worse.

  • @penguinuprighter6231
    @penguinuprighter6231 3 роки тому

    Lots of well deserved praise for your videos Dave. Must agree..well done.

  • @tordlindgren2123
    @tordlindgren2123 3 роки тому

    Thrilled to see another summary of this tech, been wanting one since I saw it a few years ago.

  • @indyola1
    @indyola1 3 роки тому +26

    To what extent are small rivers not intermittent? I understand that they don't stop when the sun goes down, but don't they occasionally dry up due to changes in rainfall, snowmelt, and seasonal factors?

    • @hc8714
      @hc8714 3 роки тому +1

      no in those tropical/Subtropics rivers.

    • @m.j.debruin3041
      @m.j.debruin3041 3 роки тому +7

      If the river is intermittent you could create a lake to feed the turbine at night and solar panels in the daytime. And you could combine with windmills.

    • @mariuszfurman4767
      @mariuszfurman4767 3 роки тому +2

      Seasonal factors are meaningless in northern part of the planet where we use most of energy and in tropics where it's badly needed. In other places different solution may be needed but not everywhere you need everything.

    • @guilhermeroneto
      @guilhermeroneto 3 роки тому +8

      They sure do. Seasonality must be considered in every renewable power plant design regardless of the technology used.

    • @johnmoncrieff3034
      @johnmoncrieff3034 3 роки тому +1

      These systems are designed to use only a fraction of the water flow of the river so the annual rise and fall of the flow are generally accounted for in the design! Normally when the flow is low then so is the demand for power as it is generally hotter so no need for heating by electricity as there is in cold weather! ( Heating is generally the biggest demand for electricity)!

  • @lukasdolezal8245
    @lukasdolezal8245 3 роки тому +3

    In many towns on small rivers and streams they already build artificial river basins to control the flow and erosion. Now I wonder how much additional cost would it be to add those turbines. Seems like it could be small cost when part of the river/stream basin construction project, but it could actually pay for itself. And I am sure the local citizens would also be more proud of it, to have local generation of power.

  • @johnfield1093
    @johnfield1093 3 роки тому

    This is a very encouraging idea. Once again, Dave, you bring solace to my turbulent mind. Ta, John.

  • @Liam1694u
    @Liam1694u 3 роки тому +1

    I've had my eye on Turbulent for years. I think it's one of the best small modular power systems ideas out there. They are rugged, robust, cheap, and easy to maintain and repair.

  • @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
    @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 3 роки тому +6

    I've said it before and I'll say it again,
    The way to use renewable energy is on the individual level.

    • @ezg8448
      @ezg8448 3 роки тому +2

      I was thinking this too, already people on UA-cam have made 1/2 kilowatt water generators with nothing but a small stream.
      Those would have a even lower environmental impact and significantly lower cost, not to mention the water source requirements are lower too.

    • @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
      @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 3 роки тому

      @@ezg8448 The part that people forget is resilient plastic requires petroleum.

    • @mieszkogulinski168
      @mieszkogulinski168 Рік тому

      @@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 But the petroleum is not burnt, so it doesn't emit CO2.

    • @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
      @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 Рік тому

      @@mieszkogulinski168 but if it's not cost effective to extract it, it won't be extracted. So either the price for solar arrays goes way up or we continue using petroleum as motor fuel.

  • @rem9882
    @rem9882 3 роки тому +3

    @9:23 on the map they say that Japan is the Philippines. How did they not spot that. Still, there doing a great thing and it’s fantastic to see

  • @larryp5359
    @larryp5359 3 роки тому +2

    These look great for very rural areas without deep freezes and with consistent stream flow. However, the amount of energy you can get out of a given volume of water is proportional (approximately) to the difference in height between the inlet and outlet. This is why very tall dams get built, more power for a given water flow. So while these can help, they won't "replace the grid" in any area with significant power needs.
    In areas where there isn't a large drop in elevation, you are limited to micro-hydro and these look good for that as long as only part of the stream's flow is diverted and the majority of the water is left in the original channel the environment isn't changed too much.

    • @johnbanka9199
      @johnbanka9199 3 роки тому

      You are correct. Dams with Francis Wheel turbines must have a head of at least six metres to overcome cavitation. These low-power units will have no cavitation issues.

  • @Pierre_Nu
    @Pierre_Nu 3 роки тому +1

    Top quality message and package once again mate.

  • @Baekstrom
    @Baekstrom 3 роки тому +3

    The comparison to the four tennis courts worth of solar installation is a bit unfair. The solar panels don't require any more space than they take up to function. The turbine is fed by a river that gets its water from a very large area in the mountains. That explains why a solution like that won't scale up very well. When you consider the entire area of land needed to provide the energy, you don't get very many watts per square meter.

    • @stevemickler452
      @stevemickler452 3 роки тому

      It is even more unfair if rooftop mounting or agriphotovoltaics is considered.

    • @Kiev-en-3-jours
      @Kiev-en-3-jours 3 роки тому

      Sure.. Let's be fair and pretend it matters: then using your logic the distance travelled by the photons from the sun to those solar panel is a lot larger than the areas crossed by those rivers. Fortunately your point of view does not make any sense whatsoever. Those turbines are a lot smaller than their photovoltaic systems equivalent. Period.

    • @lousarsol9005
      @lousarsol9005 3 роки тому +1

      I can see the angle you are coming from. Honestly I think you raise quite a valid point, this definitely can't work everywhere. Although, these turbines solve the problem of intermittent power attributed to solar panels.
      These turbines work off of the principal that they aren't leaving a large, man-made footprint on the planet.
      When taking that into consideration, I feel that the length of the river is irrelevant considering that where these turbines will work are places that no one is going to remove the river unless you are planning on putting a large scale hydro-electric dam on site.
      I would also like to point out that I disagree with Sebastian as I don't think those comparisons of logic made much sense. As I said, I feel you raised a valid point. However, I don't think anyone is going to remove a river in the effort of ecological conservation.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому

      Hi Tim. I guess I should have made it clear that I was not denigrating solar (in fact I am a big fan and have solar on my house and cabin), but it is fair to say that within the specific context the turbines take up far less space, so if a site was space limited then this is a good option.

  • @CanonFirefly
    @CanonFirefly 3 роки тому +3

    There are quite a few youtubers who have built diy micro hydro systems using upcycled components like washing machine motors.
    It would be great if you could do an episode covering these style systems. They are very small, around 500-2000w usually, but very cheap and have very limited impact on the environment.

    • @AndyFletcherX31
      @AndyFletcherX31 3 роки тому +2

      Couple of you-tubers doing this are Kris Harbour and Marty T

    • @CanonFirefly
      @CanonFirefly 3 роки тому +1

      @@AndyFletcherX31 yep, they're my favourites.

    • @louispeters2105
      @louispeters2105 Рік тому

      Most diy hydro setups are illegal "sadly"...mind blowing over-regulation is layered within multiple bloated agencies...

  • @russellbarndt6579
    @russellbarndt6579 3 роки тому

    Grateful I am for what you share and makes the rest of us aware !

  • @chancelee4707
    @chancelee4707 3 роки тому

    Love the video, great work

  • @idea-shack
    @idea-shack 3 роки тому +5

    A great choice if you have a river near your property, but how many people actually have a river near their property? When I bought my small plot in the countryside, I specifically looked for one near a river or stream and I can tell you, it was damn hard to find one. Eventually I did, but the river is just a tiny stream, although I'll take the free water to irrigate my lands, thank you very much. I did have to pay a small premium for the land, being close to the river, so there's that hidden cost. Still, land next to fresh water will someday be a very valuable commodity and also land next to rivers usually have very fertile soil, which helps of course.

    • @tombombadil3185
      @tombombadil3185 3 роки тому

      If your stream has constant flow drop a ram pump in and lift the water as high as you can and feed it thru a micro turbine /alternator. Problem solved. People are cursed with thinking bigger is better.

    • @showme360
      @showme360 3 роки тому

      Have you seen the water wheel which can not only generate electricity but pump water manually through a coiled hose?

    • @idea-shack
      @idea-shack 3 роки тому

      @@tombombadil3185 Yes, our neighbor has already installed one. We use it to raise the water as our lands are several meters above the stream's bed height so there are options there, but I don't see the need to raise it higher, the ram pump already generates the extra head pressure, I'm sure I could just put it through a nozzle into a microturbine, don't see the need to raise it per say. However, that said, one option is to use the ram pump to pump into a high reservoir and then use that to drive a microturbine intermittently when energy is required on demand.

  • @mattcbinns
    @mattcbinns 3 роки тому +6

    I’ve seen this before and this it’s an excellent idea.

  • @markimarku
    @markimarku 3 роки тому

    these are so good. After following their development for a couple of years I can not really see any downsides to them. the idea excites me a lot. Thanks for sharing this update.

  • @artboymoy
    @artboymoy 3 роки тому

    Love these videos! The sharing of ideas is priceless!

  • @Alex_Pro_A
    @Alex_Pro_A 3 роки тому +6

    This is a good and smart solution. But, like all other solutions, that have it own profs and cons. Profs you have mentioned in video.
    CONS is that such turbines have zero tolerance to ANY ice. So areas where it can be applied is very limited. You can see, that all already existing turbines is in the tropic climate only - it's not a coincidence. Conventional large scale hydropower don't have such issue, BTW.
    @JustHaveaThink it will be nice if you will mention not only a good side of each technology, but risks and limitations as well. But still you do a good job, and I'm happy to watch your channel.

    • @nuarius
      @nuarius 3 роки тому

      Depending on th4e size of the turbine and river.
      Unless you are living somewhere extremely north/south, Freezing would only be really problematic for smaller sized instillations off smaller or slower moving bodies of water.
      Even when the surface layer freezes on a River, The water is still moving. the faster the water is moving, the less ice is an issue. These could still work in a Lot of places where Sub zero winters are the norm, But would be limited to higher throughput models on higher volume bodies.

    • @Alex_Pro_A
      @Alex_Pro_A 3 роки тому

      @@nuarius according the images of real tourbines from the video, i would say that that freezing the surface of water will stop this turbine, and potentially damage it. And it is 100% sure that when temperature will rise (and ice start to crach and moving) it will damage turbine a little bit.

    • @RAndrewNeal
      @RAndrewNeal 3 роки тому

      I would think that using some grating at the intake of the vortex would stop large pieces of ice from getting to the turbine. As for the flowing water itself, as long as it remains flowing fast enough, it should prevent freezing after the water comes through the grate. If you're really that worried about it, it could probably be covered up and use some of the generated electricity to power some heat lamps that are turned on when the temperature drops a certain amount below freezing.

  • @bibliotek42
    @bibliotek42 3 роки тому +8

    "possibly somewhat invigorated and keen to have another go" :-D

  • @curtb.
    @curtb. 3 роки тому

    Great one Dave! Keep up the interesting topics

  • @williampierce2034
    @williampierce2034 3 роки тому

    Thanks Dave, good video.

  • @johnfowler4820
    @johnfowler4820 3 роки тому +6

    Brilliant . I have said it before,the grid is dead.

    • @dewiz9596
      @dewiz9596 3 роки тому

      I don’t think so. You’re not going to build one of these on Fifth Avenue

    • @tombombadil3185
      @tombombadil3185 3 роки тому

      Billions+ invested in the grid. They won't give up easily. Same for big oil, coal, all those fucking institutions.

    • @lestermarshall6501
      @lestermarshall6501 3 роки тому

      @@tombombadil3185 Big oil is already shifting to renewable energy.

    • @tombombadil3185
      @tombombadil3185 3 роки тому

      @@lestermarshall6501 Yeah, only 40 years too late. Dubya commissioned a study to debunk climate change for instance. FAILED!

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому

      @@tombombadil3185 i hope they don't give up, i dont want my electric supply depending on unreliable feeble sources like wind and solar.

  • @lamondhaughton1598
    @lamondhaughton1598 3 роки тому +11

    I seen this concept years ago they took lots of knowledge from Schauberger.

    • @ruipedrovilarinho5560
      @ruipedrovilarinho5560 3 роки тому +1

      Schauberger made one of these in the 30' or 40' last century! Almost 100 years ago! They got destroyed in II world war.

  • @garrygballard8914
    @garrygballard8914 3 роки тому +1

    Tks for this, interesting idea. Looks very adaptable.

  • @myspacetimesaucegoog5632
    @myspacetimesaucegoog5632 3 роки тому +1

    Sounds great! Spreading awareness of this and Increasing deployment should be a propriety

  • @hyric8927
    @hyric8927 3 роки тому +11

    9:20 Dave, the place marked as "Philipines" is actually Japan.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому +6

      Apparently so. I did not check their map, but I wish I had!

    • @patriot9455
      @patriot9455 3 роки тому +1

      @@JustHaveaThink May that be the worst mistake anyone makes,

    • @hyric8927
      @hyric8927 3 роки тому

      @@JustHaveaThink I see it now. Video source: Turbulent. It's a bit difficult to see (let alone notice) when the play bar obscures it.

  • @thomasalbrecht5914
    @thomasalbrecht5914 3 роки тому +8

    The Diesel engine was deliberately designed to run on all kinds of fuels and has one of the best efficiencies of combustion engines. The fact that it is in practice mostly run on mineral oil is a result of the prevalence of the fossil fuel industry. Not to advocate it above non-combustion means of generating efficiency... when there’s running water with continuously sufficient flow, small turbines are certainly superior. But a backup is never a bad idea.

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 3 роки тому +1

      Deisel engines definitely still have their place, but the higher pressure and combustion temperature also leads to the production of a lot more harmful nitrogen compounds making it harder for them to have comparable emissions to other internal combustion technologies.

    • @leerman22
      @leerman22 3 роки тому

      @@garethbaus5471 As opposed to a car, a stationary diesel generator can afford to have good scrubbing of such pollutants. If it's only used as a backup I wouldn't worry about the extra expense.

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 3 роки тому

      @@leerman22 if it's only used as a backup the extra expensive of scrubbers seems much less justified, but yes scrubbers do tend to improve emissions.

  • @eduardohproj
    @eduardohproj 3 роки тому

    Big thank you for this video. For sharing your knowledge.

  • @selbalamir
    @selbalamir 3 роки тому +2

    It always amazes me that technology advances like this are never featured on the news

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому

      because it's not an advance and the company has barely installed any due to the extreme cost?

  • @martir.7653
    @martir.7653 3 роки тому +5

    Honestly this sounds too good to be true. Since no serious criticisms were covered, it makes me suspicious there is something that's not being said.

    • @lexiecrewther7038
      @lexiecrewther7038 3 роки тому +1

      He keeps flogging these pipe dream cons that fail the physics smell test. I also suspect that he is being sponsored

    • @lexiecrewther7038
      @lexiecrewther7038 3 роки тому

      A 15kw turbine requires either enormous water flow at low head, or high head and moderate flow. There's no such thing as a 15kw "micro turbine"

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому +1

      @@lexiecrewther7038 Most of the videos are promoting stuff that hasn't even made it beyond the speculation/hype stage, it's all rubbish recycled from other youtube videos. his audience should check back a few years and see what's come of any of the stuff he was promoting in, say, 2017.

    • @cavemann_
      @cavemann_ 3 роки тому

      @@lexiecrewther7038 He's legally obligated to state who sponsors him on youtube so I doubt that.

    • @cavemann_
      @cavemann_ 3 роки тому

      @@Withnail1969 Spreading knowledge about more ecological ways of producing power is just as important as making them work. And some of the stuff he covered is being used on a decently large scale so it's not like it's all bogus.

  • @EctoMorpheus
    @EctoMorpheus 3 роки тому +7

    5:22 it's a shame that company already took it, otherwise Electricidad would have been a great name for this channel :)

  • @greggm7056
    @greggm7056 3 роки тому

    Excellent video Dave, thank you!

  • @richardabrahams585
    @richardabrahams585 2 роки тому

    Bravo team tech!! Excellent inspiration!! Cheers

  • @martyschrader
    @martyschrader 3 роки тому +3

    I've been keeping one eye on Turbulent for a couple years now. This stuff is going to be the micro-gen grid of the future, you betcha. The US of A will, of course, be the last domino to fall, but we'll have to do something like this to support the extension of generation from large plants to smaller, spread-out sources. Our infrastructure simply can't handle the loads any more, as witnessed by the recent mess in Texas. Small generators spread all over hell and gone will save our electrical grid's bacon by making the major load-bearing lines do less work. Watch for it.

    • @johnbanka9199
      @johnbanka9199 3 роки тому

      Just wait until you find the regulatory hell each of these little turbines faces if it is to be connected to the grid! Good luck!!

  • @Runescope
    @Runescope 3 роки тому +4

    These are hardly new. They’ve been around for years.

    • @lexiecrewther7038
      @lexiecrewther7038 3 роки тому +2

      Dave takes his patreon suckers money and regurgitates old UA-cam pipe dream videos, and the suckers beg for more

    • @Withnail1969
      @Withnail1969 3 роки тому +1

      @@lexiecrewther7038 Ha ha nail on head. None of these dumb ideas ever make it into the real world because they don't work.

  • @petervanelslander6206
    @petervanelslander6206 3 роки тому +1

    truly grand thinking and contemplating! love it, thanks

  • @FalconWing1813
    @FalconWing1813 3 роки тому

    This is a Great, Simple Solution. And I Hope to see these installations increase.

  • @anders21karlsson
    @anders21karlsson 2 роки тому

    Great video as always.

  • @chrisb508
    @chrisb508 3 роки тому +2

    I love the idea of decentralizing power generation. I think it's the key to making power cheap, accessible, and renewable by focusing on using what is best locally.

  • @pdxyadayada
    @pdxyadayada 3 роки тому

    Keep up the good work! You’re one of my favs..

  • @johnmoncrieff3034
    @johnmoncrieff3034 3 роки тому +2

    This has to be the best form of renewable power generation that most governments and large power companies have deliberately ignored for decades! Tied into highly efficient insulated housing this has to be put at the forefront of future developments throughout the planet! All local authorities should be specifying these for current and future planning regulations! Here in Scotland, I see this as a means of opening up the remoter parts of the highlands to modern industry, housing, and sustainable living! Without the need for expensive grid connections & all the hassle that brings!

    • @bluceree7312
      @bluceree7312 3 роки тому +1

      Also, infrastructure for communal ground heat pumps. The first one was just installed in East England a month ago.

    • @kateegnaczak5902
      @kateegnaczak5902 3 роки тому +1

      Governments and large power companies did not deliberately IGNORE for decades, they actively prohibit them and regulate them out of existence.

  • @Rezac66
    @Rezac66 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for the good news!
    Here i Sweden we really should be able to use this kind of waterpower.
    Video now shared.

  • @michaelchildish
    @michaelchildish 3 роки тому

    fabulous concept!

  • @robfer5370
    @robfer5370 Рік тому

    WOW, nice one Dave. We need more of these, they will be a real game changer if fully adopted worldwide!! 👍

  • @davidleahy6141
    @davidleahy6141 3 роки тому +2

    Shout out to the commentators of this channel. Mightally impressed with the quality of discourse.

  • @ablacknambercat
    @ablacknambercat 3 роки тому +2

    Before rural electrification in Ireland, there were 3 old mill weirs generating electricity(and selling it) in Kilkenny. Once the Electricity Supply Board took over you could not sell electricity and they fell out of use. A shame because imagine these used to power street lights, traffic lights and other community use electric demands rather than a bill to the ESB.

    • @rolliebca
      @rolliebca 3 роки тому +1

      Tom G - I believe it's deplorable that in today's bureaucracy they not only prevent you from selling the power, they make it illegal to even give it away or use it yourself. Further tightening the grip of societal imposed slavery. Our world could be so much better if that were not the case. I'd love to hear peoples opinions on how to fix this.

    • @donutemptycircle8717
      @donutemptycircle8717 3 роки тому

      @@rolliebca Watching a Hawaiian dam about to break while generally noticing freakish rainfall events all over the world suggests any return to ye olde early days of industry might well be impossible.

  • @dbc105
    @dbc105 3 роки тому +1

    one of the best economical designs I've seen. If I lived on a creek I would build a small one for myself.

  • @antoninoarato
    @antoninoarato 3 роки тому

    Love this channel ❤

  • @terrystephens1102
    @terrystephens1102 3 роки тому

    I love the low impact and, the ability to combine multiples of the micro turbines to service larger areas.

  • @JonathanGarneau
    @JonathanGarneau 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent video! I especially liked the $/kWh estimate! Priceless!

  • @danielhanawalt4998
    @danielhanawalt4998 2 роки тому

    So I live close to a river and now thinking about acquiring a lot close enough I could try this. Sounds really good. Very interesting video. Thanks for bringing so much thoughtful content.

  • @hktrader88
    @hktrader88 3 роки тому +1

    Great channel - just subscribed ! I recall seeing the Turbulent installation in Chile on YT before - great to see they have expanded across the globe (hope someone can update/correctly locate The Philippines in future !). Look forward to more content like this !

  • @geesh2004
    @geesh2004 2 роки тому

    10 years ago my company manufactured a 5kW, low head, small scale hydrodynamic screw at relatively low cost which is still working! With proper maintenance it will continue to work for many years to come. I think a major problem is the need for an abstraction licence which requires many hoops to be hopped through! Great vid!

  • @JerryVHall
    @JerryVHall 2 роки тому

    I have just purchased a small lot in Costa Rica with a year round stream and a waterfall - I am diving deep into the Micro Hydro topic - Thx for the video

  • @TheExidion
    @TheExidion 3 роки тому

    Really enjoyed this one, gives us hope that there are brilliant people out there striving to overcome and actually thinking about the negative impacts of renewable energy systems in order to work with nature not against it👏

  • @themwuzthedaze
    @themwuzthedaze 3 роки тому

    Nicely done, good sir. I find this and similar shows encouraging and stimulating. Thank you for your excellent contribution to a brighter tomorrow (if you'll pardon the pun)!

  • @b8e5n
    @b8e5n 3 роки тому

    Very cool you made a video about that. I saw that about a year ago and i love that system. It is perfect for many places that has even a medium flow of water with a rather low hight drop. I was even think to put one at my fathers place where there is a water stream in falls-winter-spring.
    Good to know they are expanding and helping for these good causes!

  • @dscottboris5132
    @dscottboris5132 3 роки тому

    Good idea, so simple an effective.

  • @salimufari
    @salimufari 3 роки тому

    I found Turbulent about 2 years ago & have been totally enamored with their model. Hoping to include a similar device much like our host's retirement model.

  • @kiwifeijoa
    @kiwifeijoa 3 роки тому

    So interesting. Can see how this idea would connect well with regreening projects, so that when the water returns to arid areas, as the aquatic life starts to come back they have untouched flow areas and some parts channeled off for micro power. Even wondering how small one of these can be for a single house considering that smaller seems to equal less damage. Such an excellent idea. Less grand schemes more of the useful and small. Great video.

  • @Paladin1873
    @Paladin1873 3 роки тому +1

    This reminds me of the small water turbines I looked at over 30 years ago. The idea was you could drop them into nearby streams to generate electricity for your rural home. They didn't generate much wattage, but if you had enough of them it might have been a feasible solution, provided you lived in a temperate climate where the water never froze.

  • @justjames1111
    @justjames1111 3 роки тому

    Another really interesting and thought provoking video. Good job.

  • @donlourie769
    @donlourie769 3 роки тому

    I am always amazed at your precise use of language to make important points clearly and quickly.

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 роки тому

      Thank you Don. I appreciate your feedback :-)

  • @ÁrvoresEmadeiras
    @ÁrvoresEmadeiras 3 роки тому

    Great video, thanks for the information.

  • @normanfrancisco2063
    @normanfrancisco2063 3 роки тому +1

    Wow... This is exactly what we need... Thanks...