Would go either for the Presonus Eris E3.5 (for smaller and elongated rooms) oder Presonus Eris E4.5 (for bigger and wider rooms) in this case. Since there has been a new model of the Presonus Eris E4.5 out there for quite some time (which finally got a stepless treble and bass control just like at the smaller E3.5 for a much better room adaptation), even the Presonus Eris E4.5 come into consideration for acoustically untreated 'n' less big rooms (something like wallpaper at the walls and the ceiling, a big carpet or floor covering and some furniture should be fine to absorb a good amount of the bass reflections in the room and to get a nice and clean sonic image within a fairly flat frequency responce). So, in the end... ... the Presonus Eris E3.5 have a little bit more treble-heavy, but definitely crystal clear sound and the Presonus Eris E4.5 have a quite more voluminous and forceful sound (where you get a much better impression of the force of sound effects like gun shots and explosions or the deeper bass frequencies in general). For a kinda flat frequency response, I'd recommend to lower the trebles at the E3.5 around 1 dB and the basses around 2dB. And for the E4.5, I'd keep the trebles at the standard position and lower the basses around 3 to 4 dB. Make sure to put them on adequate stands (tweeters should be around the height of your ears in your standard listening position) and move these studio monitor speakers with their rear bass ports at least around 30 cm from the walls behind (aditionally prevents basses from overreacting in your room - especially in acoustically untreated rooms). The good thing of both studio monitor sizes (Presonus Eris E3.5 and Presonus Eris E4.5) is the really low energy consumption of just around 2*25 W (50 W for the whole pair of studio monitor speakers at a max) whereby you get a very nice and pretty accurate studio monitor sound quality and audio definition.
Sude why would you cut low frequencies when the lowest they get is 70 Hz? I mean, if these were monitors that reach 45 Hz at least i'd maybe consider it but if i take an EQ and close the range with high and low pass i will hear nothing from 40 to 65 Hz at least, i wouldnt consider taking down those 70 to 95 Hz because i think it woild sound not flat, but totally boring. Wouldn't trust these for flat monitoring
@@Esefedege In many cases, it's good to turn down the bass a little bit because you'll hear much more of the (for mixings) critical mid frequency range and less of nasty bass reflections in the room (bass reflections tend to stay longer in the room than the other frequencies), especially if you have no special acoustic treatment on the walls, ceiling and floor (and many ordinary listeners won't have this). Since the Presonus Eris E 3.5 also have quite a bump at 120 Hz, it's useful for a more flat listening experience to reduce the bass a little bit. At least bass and mids should be quite even and on a similar level because a too heavy bass tends to cover up mids and this can make the listening experience more muddy or less defined. ... To add a little bit more deep bass (without adding volume to the already existing bass range of the studio monitor boxes), I'd recommend a separately controllable studio subwoofer with which you can filter out the existing bass range and just turn up the volume of the missing deep bass range). The Japanese Fostex PM-Submini 2 is a pretty good subwoofer which is quite compact and small but still big enough to bring in some deep 40 Hz bass frequencies. But I still turn up the volume of the subwoofer just a little bit to have a little bit of deep bass between my feet - without stressing my neighbours. ... For beginners, the Presonus Eris E 3.5 and E4.5 are still some the best budget studio monitor with which you can already get some decent first mixings. ... If you really want to trust your ears in connection with your studio monitor speakers and create some professional mixes, I'd rather go for the Yamaha MSP series, some really professional audio tools and the current studio monitor flagship of the Yamaha company.
Yeah good thoughts mate, i agree. I've been using Mackie MR5 MK3 for a couple years and i can't find good monitors for a lower price, most of the 4" inch monitors don't go under 70 Hz and i don't want to buy ones that won't go down to 40 - 45 Hz because my studio is prepared for 5 inch ones and the MR5's have that range.
@@Master.Mi.777 I'm an electronic music producer so i use them for mixing and audio editing. I'm going to save my money for KRK's Rokit Cl5 G3, i know it's not the last generation but the range and definition on the low end (honestly) makes my dick go boom lmao
I was thinking about which one to buy, but thanks to you, I decided.
m200 샀는데 매우 만족스럽습니다.
Good comparo. I was primarily looking for a TV sound monitor , then music followed by gaming. Presonus then for me.
Would go either for the Presonus Eris E3.5 (for smaller and elongated rooms) oder Presonus Eris E4.5 (for bigger and wider rooms) in this case.
Since there has been a new model of the Presonus Eris E4.5 out there for quite some time (which finally got a stepless treble and bass control just like at the smaller E3.5 for a much better room adaptation), even the Presonus Eris E4.5 come into consideration for acoustically untreated 'n' less big rooms (something like wallpaper at the walls and the ceiling, a big carpet or floor covering and some furniture should be fine to absorb a good amount of the bass reflections in the room and to get a nice and clean sonic image within a fairly flat frequency responce).
So, in the end...
... the Presonus Eris E3.5 have a little bit more treble-heavy, but definitely crystal clear sound and the Presonus Eris E4.5 have a quite more voluminous and forceful sound (where you get a much better impression of the force of sound effects like gun shots and explosions or the deeper bass frequencies in general).
For a kinda flat frequency response, I'd recommend to lower the trebles at the E3.5 around 1 dB and the basses around 2dB.
And for the E4.5, I'd keep the trebles at the standard position and lower the basses around 3 to 4 dB.
Make sure to put them on adequate stands (tweeters should be around the height of your ears in your standard listening position) and move these studio monitor speakers with their rear bass ports at least around 30 cm from the walls behind (aditionally prevents basses from overreacting in your room - especially in acoustically untreated rooms).
The good thing of both studio monitor sizes (Presonus Eris E3.5 and Presonus Eris E4.5) is the really low energy consumption of just around 2*25 W (50 W for the whole pair of studio monitor speakers at a max) whereby you get a very nice and pretty accurate studio monitor sound quality and audio definition.
Sude why would you cut low frequencies when the lowest they get is 70 Hz? I mean, if these were monitors that reach 45 Hz at least i'd maybe consider it but if i take an EQ and close the range with high and low pass i will hear nothing from 40 to 65 Hz at least, i wouldnt consider taking down those 70 to 95 Hz because i think it woild sound not flat, but totally boring. Wouldn't trust these for flat monitoring
@@Esefedege In many cases, it's good to turn down the bass a little bit because you'll hear much more of the (for mixings) critical mid frequency range and less of nasty bass reflections in the room (bass reflections tend to stay longer in the room than the other frequencies), especially if you have no special acoustic treatment on the walls, ceiling and floor (and many ordinary listeners won't have this).
Since the Presonus Eris E 3.5 also have quite a bump at 120 Hz, it's useful for a more flat listening experience to reduce the bass a little bit.
At least bass and mids should be quite even and on a similar level because a too heavy bass tends to cover up mids and this can make the listening experience more muddy or less defined.
...
To add a little bit more deep bass (without adding volume to the already existing bass range of the studio monitor boxes), I'd recommend a separately controllable studio subwoofer with which you can filter out the existing bass range and just turn up the volume of the missing deep bass range).
The Japanese Fostex PM-Submini 2 is a pretty good subwoofer which is quite compact and small but still big enough to bring in some deep 40 Hz bass frequencies.
But I still turn up the volume of the subwoofer just a little bit to have a little bit of deep bass between my feet - without stressing my neighbours.
...
For beginners, the Presonus Eris E 3.5 and E4.5 are still some the best budget studio monitor with which you can already get some decent first mixings.
...
If you really want to trust your ears in connection with your studio monitor speakers and create some professional mixes, I'd rather go for the Yamaha MSP series, some really professional audio tools and the current studio monitor flagship of the Yamaha company.
Yeah good thoughts mate, i agree. I've been using Mackie MR5 MK3 for a couple years and i can't find good monitors for a lower price, most of the 4" inch monitors don't go under 70 Hz and i don't want to buy ones that won't go down to 40 - 45 Hz because my studio is prepared for 5 inch ones and the MR5's have that range.
@@Esefedege You use them for mixing - or rather just for listening to music and gaming?
@@Master.Mi.777 I'm an electronic music producer so i use them for mixing and audio editing. I'm going to save my money for KRK's Rokit Cl5 G3, i know it's not the last generation but the range and definition on the low end (honestly) makes my dick go boom lmao
For Presonus Eris E3.5 , can i just plugin to my pc without connect to audio interface? And the quality still ok or not?
I think so.
@@soundcomparisonslibrary7857 no
So which ones are better to buy
In my opinion, the PreSonus sound is better.
PreSonus!
Artesia of corse !!!
artesia i been using them for 2 years
PreSonus is more open on highs then Artesia. To my ears, It's hard to know which one has the flatter response. Hard choise.
Los artesia son mucho mas planos. Ideales para producir y mezclar musica. Los PreSonus son mas para muntimedia y el mundo del Gaming.
eris is a little Muddy, m200 is more Flat response
1 best comment here
eris 3.5 sounds better than m200
no
이걸로만 들으면 m200이 좀더 생동감 있네.