WATCH a 5 HOUR review of Spider-Man 3 on our new CutScene Patreon: www.patreon.com/cutscene Did you know about Venom's original death in Spider-Man 3? 00:00 - Intro 04:11 - The Making of Spider-Man 3 14:18 - The 'Alternative' Ending 21:56 - What Really Happened
Is the 5 hour Patreon podcast just Oli telling Luke all the reasons why losing the goatee was a mistake? (I’m kidding, I assume it’s for movember) Also, really loved this vid!
I always thought they should have given the symbiote its own trilogy. 4th film would have been Peter wearing the suit, 5th film would have been Spidey vs Venom, and 6th film would have had Carnage as a villain.
I don't even care anymore......I LOVE THIS MOVIE 🔥 Also, I was expecting Luke to use some sort of Steiner Math to justify how GOOD Spider-Man 3 really is! 😂🍿
While I don’t think you should force a director to make parts of a film they aren’t passionate about, I do think there was a sort of stubbornness and lack of an open mind from Raimi that hindered the movie overall. Raimi claims that he connects to Spider-Man villains due to their relatability and “having a good heart” beneath the villain character, and that he couldn’t find that in Venom. Which is insane to me, because this is why Venom became so popular. You didn’t have to look very far in media to find examples of Venoms good side, from the Lethal Protector comics to the Spider-Man PS1 game, there were PLENTY of examples of Venom having the same humanity in him that Raimi found in his favorite villains. Raimi claiming he couldn’t see it with Venom is baffling, and makes me think he must’ve just read Venoms origin story and decided his opinions on the character then and there. Which is disappointing. This feels like the rare occasion where the producer has a better finger on the pulse of the fans than the director did. I as a 10 year old was so excited to see this movie solely for Venom, because Venom was my favorite. I can say with 100% certainty that I didn’t give a crap about Vulture, and wouldn’t have cared nearly as much if he were the replacement villain. Does that mean I think Raimi should’ve been forced to put Venom in when it compromised his creative vision? No. But I do wish he maybe would’ve had more of an open mind to the suggestion.
Hi luke, who do you think is current Peter Parker, not spider man, but peter parker within entire wrestling industry- with great power comes great responsibility.
And I apologise for a comment related to wrestling though it's a video about movie analysis but couldn't resist. Thanks, love you , Oli and whole wrestletalk team.
I love u guys, but I don't think anyone, even the actual editors of the film, have or SHOULD spend 5 hours on Spider-Man 3.... even with it actually never being as bad as these schmucks make it out to be; 5 hours is worse than overkill
Venom isn’t that iconic as far as spider-man villains go, the main reason the character is so well known is a fan created the character and marvel bent him over and screwed him out of royalties.
Gotta love reading misinformation on the internet. He didn’t create Venom, all he did was suggest the idea of Spider-man having a black costume, and the final design wasn’t even what he had drawn. In an article he wrote he mentioned he didn’t want money since he already got paid for the idea, just acknowledgment of some kind, which even though it took them a while to do it, they did when they published Sensational Spider-Man: Self-improvement in 2019. Also saying this is the main reason he is well known and calling him not “that iconic” when they literally made 3 movies about him as well as being the main villain in the newest Spider-man video game and countless other stories is just asinine.
"Venom isn't that Iconic as Spider-Man villains go." Nigga, how come the movie he was in made a billion dollars, THREE movies about him, and a multiple comic series, his own toy line, AND a song by Eminem? 🥴
WATCH a 5 HOUR review of Spider-Man 3 on our new CutScene Patreon: www.patreon.com/cutscene
Did you know about Venom's original death in Spider-Man 3?
00:00 - Intro
04:11 - The Making of Spider-Man 3
14:18 - The 'Alternative' Ending
21:56 - What Really Happened
15:29
Wait a minute.......IT'S PURPLE SKELETON WHA HAPPUN MAN!!!!!!!
Great shout for having Matt McMuscles on the show!
Luke got Spider-Matt to read the book, how cool is that?
Finally! A new cutscene
Man the original sounds amazing
Great video D.A.D
I think a hear a flop house talking! What happened??? 😂
LUKE: Very honoured by the appearance !
Damn right we grew up, Spiderman 3 was great, and Bullly Maguire was great and i knew it was great then.
Lotta people switchin on it now, but real ones loved it since it came out
@crunchytomato20 ong, No Way Home came out and all of a sudden everyone loved Spiderman 3. Maaaan where were yall all them years ago??
God I love this channel. Makes being a "nerd" for these topics even in my 30's comfortable.
Can you do an episode about BatNips?
16:09 It’s the Mediocre Spider-Matt! Awesome to see him add to this Wha Happun! 😎
Is the 5 hour Patreon podcast just Oli telling Luke all the reasons why losing the goatee was a mistake?
(I’m kidding, I assume it’s for movember)
Also, really loved this vid!
MATT MCMUSCLES!!!!!
I always thought they should have given the symbiote its own trilogy. 4th film would have been Peter wearing the suit, 5th film would have been Spidey vs Venom, and 6th film would have had Carnage as a villain.
MATT - Mc -MUSCLES
👏👏👏👏👏
I was like 9 when it came out and it was my favorite movie ever lol
I don't even care anymore......I LOVE THIS MOVIE 🔥
Also, I was expecting Luke to use some sort of Steiner Math to justify how GOOD Spider-Man 3 really is! 😂🍿
LUKE: I have… mixed feelings on the movie 😅
Honestly, my only issue with Spiderman 3 is that Eric Foreman is no Eddie Brock.
I honestly think it’s a decent film it has its flaws & it’s not as good as the first 2 but I still love it & it is a comfort film for me
Seriously, why are people so snobby when it comes to comic books!? They’re just as much a viable form of story-telling as any other medium.
While I don’t think you should force a director to make parts of a film they aren’t passionate about, I do think there was a sort of stubbornness and lack of an open mind from Raimi that hindered the movie overall. Raimi claims that he connects to Spider-Man villains due to their relatability and “having a good heart” beneath the villain character, and that he couldn’t find that in Venom. Which is insane to me, because this is why Venom became so popular. You didn’t have to look very far in media to find examples of Venoms good side, from the Lethal Protector comics to the Spider-Man PS1 game, there were PLENTY of examples of Venom having the same humanity in him that Raimi found in his favorite villains. Raimi claiming he couldn’t see it with Venom is baffling, and makes me think he must’ve just read Venoms origin story and decided his opinions on the character then and there. Which is disappointing. This feels like the rare occasion where the producer has a better finger on the pulse of the fans than the director did. I as a 10 year old was so excited to see this movie solely for Venom, because Venom was my favorite. I can say with 100% certainty that I didn’t give a crap about Vulture, and wouldn’t have cared nearly as much if he were the replacement villain. Does that mean I think Raimi should’ve been forced to put Venom in when it compromised his creative vision? No. But I do wish he maybe would’ve had more of an open mind to the suggestion.
Hi luke, who do you think is current Peter Parker, not spider man, but peter parker within entire wrestling industry- with great power comes great responsibility.
And I apologise for a comment related to wrestling though it's a video about movie analysis but couldn't resist. Thanks, love you , Oli and whole wrestletalk team.
I love u guys, but I don't think anyone, even the actual editors of the film, have or SHOULD spend 5 hours on Spider-Man 3.... even with it actually never being as bad as these schmucks make it out to be; 5 hours is worse than overkill
At least it gave us Bully Maguire. A pure cinematic masterpiece.
Venom isn’t that iconic as far as spider-man villains go, the main reason the character is so well known is a fan created the character and marvel bent him over and screwed him out of royalties.
Gotta love reading misinformation on the internet. He didn’t create Venom, all he did was suggest the idea of Spider-man having a black costume, and the final design wasn’t even what he had drawn. In an article he wrote he mentioned he didn’t want money since he already got paid for the idea, just acknowledgment of some kind, which even though it took them a while to do it, they did when they published Sensational Spider-Man: Self-improvement in 2019. Also saying this is the main reason he is well known and calling him not “that iconic” when they literally made 3 movies about him as well as being the main villain in the newest Spider-man video game and countless other stories is just asinine.
"Venom isn't that Iconic as Spider-Man villains go."
Nigga, how come the movie he was in made a billion dollars, THREE movies about him, and a multiple comic series, his own toy line, AND a song by Eminem? 🥴