A Look At The Airbus A330 MRTT: The Military Version Of The A330-200

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 вер 2023
  • The Airbus A330 has been a staple aircraft of long-haul commercial air travel since Air Inter first flew it commercially in 1994. However, it has also proved to be a successful base for several further developments, used in other areas of aviation. For example, Airbus based its enormous Beluga XL freighter on the type, making its first flight in 2018. And, over the last decade, a variant of the type has also entered military service in various countries - the A330 MRTT.
    Article: simpleflying.com/airbus-a330-...
    Our Social Media:
    / simpleflyin. .
    / simple_flying
    / simpleflying. .
    Our Website
    simpleflying.com/
    For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @brianspeck4226
    @brianspeck4226 9 місяців тому +25

    The RCAF is replacing their five 1980's A310 with eight A330. The first two ex-Kuwaiti Airways MRTT conversions come online the end of 2023.

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 9 місяців тому +8

    Looking forward for the opportunity of new A330-800neo MRTT

  • @jstriggsr
    @jstriggsr 9 місяців тому +2

    gotta love it !!

  • @akrammy9251
    @akrammy9251 9 місяців тому +1

    Very good

  • @trob0914
    @trob0914 9 місяців тому +20

    So the MRTT based on the …330,can carry more fuel than the KC46 based on the 767?

    • @nntflow7058
      @nntflow7058 9 місяців тому +13

      Well d'oh. It's a larger aircraft with large fuel tanks and more range to begin with.

    • @papatango2362
      @papatango2362 9 місяців тому +6

      The KC10 has even higher fuel offload capacity but they are being phased out of the USAF.

    • @RobEJC
      @RobEJC 9 місяців тому

      Love the KC-10, was able to fly on one those lovely birds once. @@papatango2362

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 5 місяців тому +2

      Yep. Way more.

  • @Tpr_1808
    @Tpr_1808 9 місяців тому +1

    The last ceo in production

  • @hachogonzalez8649
    @hachogonzalez8649 9 місяців тому +1

    I want one

  • @KC-gp4mf
    @KC-gp4mf 9 місяців тому +40

    Better than Boeing 767 tanker/transport. Feel bad for US military that had to buy from Boeing and all the quality issues that comes with it.

    • @explorenaked
      @explorenaked 9 місяців тому +3

      🙄

    • @lours6993
      @lours6993 9 місяців тому +34

      The US military chose the A330 Tanker 2 or 3 times and each time were overruled by Boeing owned congress members. They were stuck with the 767 version they had rejected.

    • @techdefined9420
      @techdefined9420 9 місяців тому +5

      The A330 is much modern, can deploy the boom autonomously.

  • @Sienghin1
    @Sienghin1 9 місяців тому +1

    I love A330 with wingtips

    • @steve3425
      @steve3425 9 місяців тому +5

      All fixed-wing airplanes have wing tips. You’ll have to be more specific.

    • @theharper1
      @theharper1 9 місяців тому +1

      Winglets?

  • @salehwahib3749
    @salehwahib3749 6 місяців тому +2

    Can anyone tell me that are there any A330 MRTT parts which is made in Germany

  • @AviationCommercials
    @AviationCommercials 9 місяців тому +5

    My thoughts? This is the second video on this topic from you in one month...

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 5 місяців тому +1

      Clearly important. May have something to do with the fact that the USAF is currently going to market for the KC-10 replacement. What do you think?

  • @Elliasp-xx7mb
    @Elliasp-xx7mb 9 місяців тому +4

    I love the A330 MRTT 200... except for the gray mat color (I would prefer it more... "metallic" shiny - old school) 😄😄😄😄😄

  • @Mightype
    @Mightype 9 місяців тому +1

    Ok

  • @jamiesworld1690
    @jamiesworld1690 9 місяців тому +1

    Hope they upgraded to a340 or use more defunct aircraft fir military services l8ke a340 mrtt

  • @Facs1
    @Facs1 9 місяців тому +1

    3rd Here

  • @papatango2362
    @papatango2362 9 місяців тому +9

    1:50. Not quite. The KC10 extender has the highest offload capacity of any tanker. However, these aircraft are being phased out of the USAF.
    Also the KC46 Pegasus and the KC10 have the capability to be refueled by another tanker giving them greater loiter time.

    • @b127_1
      @b127_1 9 місяців тому +7

      It is also possible to refuel A330 MRTT from other tanker aircraft. The receptacle is optional, so not all MRTT aircraft have it, but it shouldn't be too hard to retrofit if need be.

    • @RobEJC
      @RobEJC 9 місяців тому +1

      I hope they packed extra sandwiches.

    • @smeary10
      @smeary10 5 місяців тому

      So does the KC-30. Unless Boeing bribes and cheats again, KC-10 will be replaced with KC-30.

  • @Kliffy77
    @Kliffy77 9 місяців тому +4

    MRTT needs to move to the Neo Platform

    • @johniii8147
      @johniii8147 9 місяців тому +8

      Probably not worth the certification costs for such low volume.

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername Місяць тому

      Airbus is investigating the NEO. They need to decide whether the costs are worth the additional orders - the wing is slightly different, among other things.

  • @hollohd3180
    @hollohd3180 9 місяців тому +1

    What has Boeing to compere ?

    • @papatango2362
      @papatango2362 9 місяців тому +1

      KC46 Pegasus (derivative of the 767)

    • @wudruffwildcard252
      @wudruffwildcard252 7 місяців тому +2

      Nothing that compares. Even the US military didn't want the Boeing tankers, but were overruled by Boeing lobbyists in congress.

  • @PavlosPapageorgiou
    @PavlosPapageorgiou 9 місяців тому +2

    I plan not to use one. Seems like trouble!

  • @happilyham6769
    @happilyham6769 9 місяців тому +1

    I don't like twin-jets. All passenger jets should have at least 3 engines, preferably 4. But even more than that would be cool too.

    • @mteagleworld
      @mteagleworld 9 місяців тому +4

      You'll love the BAe 146

    • @Elliasp-xx7mb
      @Elliasp-xx7mb 9 місяців тому +3

      DC10 addict ? ;-)

    • @_msraviation
      @_msraviation 9 місяців тому +11

      ok grandpa lets get you to bed

    • @WNDWSTIDN
      @WNDWSTIDN 8 місяців тому +1

      Sure, but those 3 engines and 4 engines was bad for economy.

  • @adeptpeasant6161
    @adeptpeasant6161 9 місяців тому +3

    Never forget 9/11 was struck by military planes

    • @wisehat_yt
      @wisehat_yt 9 місяців тому +10

      no it wasn’t lmao

    • @GarlandTexasSpotter2024
      @GarlandTexasSpotter2024 9 місяців тому +4

      @@wisehat_ytit was struck with 2 Boeing 767-200s

    • @JDFloyd
      @JDFloyd 9 місяців тому +2

      False. Do your research.

    • @GarlandTexasSpotter2024
      @GarlandTexasSpotter2024 9 місяців тому

      @@JDFloydI was talking about twin towers, It was also involved with 2 Boeing 757-200s

    • @_msraviation
      @_msraviation 9 місяців тому +1

      this is satire right