One of the few versions floating around on UA-cam which I completely love 🧡 It swings, it breathes, it’s ‘see through’ enough for all the different parts to be heard- just beautiful. Also the celli/basses 💙💜 Thanks for the bliss!
The aural equivalent of the difference between candles and LED's for lighting. Warm, rich, full vs. harsh, edgy, glaring. People say that, if Bach were working today, he would happily have used modern instruments. Well then, for my part, I'm glad he was working back in the Baroque!
I agree with what you said, however different styles call for different instruments. I'm a composer in the 21st century and I'm perfectly happy with modern instruments, because I write in a style that calls for them. I think if Bach were alive today, he would probably be writing in a more modern style (and therefore modern instruments would be used), but if he were writing intentionally in an older style (such as baroque), he would likely want instruments from that time.
Absolutely stunning. So refreshing with this apt, historical approach. Period instruments do make a huge difference in terms of the crisp Baroque sound. Well done on an exquisite performance of this amazing work! Bravo!!
Bach estaba ya tan metido en su genialidad que no podía ya escribir algo sin que fuera una obra maestra... me asombra como en el primer movimiento los dos violines tocan entre ellos haciendo una fuga a dos voces independientemente del acompañamiento orquestal y el bajo continuo.
This is brilliant! The difference between period and historically interpreted performances in terms of the instruments, is that what we call “period” instruments are actually instruments from the era itself. If you play on instruments that are modelled on period instruments or replicas, musicologically it’s better to call them historically interpretations of instruments, e.g. a 300-year-old cello vs a new replica of the former cello. I have a flute made of resin that’s modelled on the Baroque flute but it’s tuned to modern pitch.
¡ Oh ! con qué alcurnia de dorado brillo se establece este devenir en llamas dentro de mí. Es la gloria imperecedera de un dios hecho hombre. Y que regala el esfuerzo del genio creador para los parabienes del sujeto trascendental.
@@dantem4119 It's because often, composers are not only writing with theory and/or counterpoint in mind, but the temperament. A skilled composer of this period would understand the nuances of the tuning and temperament they are using and can make compositional choices of such. In this case, bach would've been writing in the context of well temperament, basing musical choices off how intervals in this temperament would interact. Using equal temperament gets rid of this expression. No trouble though.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I appreciate the Vivace actually being played at a tempo that does not resemble slumber like almost every other recording I've ever heard.
One of the few versions floating around on UA-cam which I completely love 🧡
It swings, it breathes, it’s ‘see through’ enough for all the different parts to be heard- just beautiful.
Also the celli/basses 💙💜
Thanks for the bliss!
The aural equivalent of the difference between candles and LED's for lighting. Warm, rich, full vs. harsh, edgy, glaring. People say that, if Bach were working today, he would happily have used modern instruments. Well then, for my part, I'm glad he was working back in the Baroque!
I agree with what you said, however different styles call for different instruments. I'm a composer in the 21st century and I'm perfectly happy with modern instruments, because I write in a style that calls for them. I think if Bach were alive today, he would probably be writing in a more modern style (and therefore modern instruments would be used), but if he were writing intentionally in an older style (such as baroque), he would likely want instruments from that time.
Merilora, well said!
Bach wouldn't use modern tuning because he understood Affektlehren, something modern music since the romantic period has completely abandoned.
Bach lived at the end of the Baroque and the beginning of the Classical era. The Romanic era came after the Classical era.
🎉
Finally a slow movement tempo that is really Largo!
It’s just gorgeous! 👍⭐️👌
Absolutely stunning. So refreshing with this apt, historical approach. Period instruments do make a huge difference in terms of the crisp Baroque sound. Well done on an exquisite performance of this amazing work! Bravo!!
Magical interpretation. The Freiburgers are always magnificent.
Man, this is just just brilliant, great sound.
この曲も大好きな1曲です 。❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Simply breathtaking. Among the, if not The, best performance I've heard 😍
this is the most useful video on youtube for learning on guitar when you tend to be tuned to Eb !
Also try S&M Nothing Else Matters
Bach estaba ya tan metido en su genialidad que no podía ya escribir algo sin que fuera una obra maestra... me asombra como en el primer movimiento los dos violines tocan entre ellos haciendo una fuga a dos voces independientemente del acompañamiento orquestal y el bajo continuo.
literalmente eso ocurre en los 3 movimientos xd
This is brilliant! The difference between period and historically interpreted performances in terms of the instruments, is that what we call “period” instruments are actually instruments from the era itself. If you play on instruments that are modelled on period instruments or replicas, musicologically it’s better to call them historically interpretations of instruments, e.g. a 300-year-old cello vs a new replica of the former cello. I have a flute made of resin that’s modelled on the Baroque flute but it’s tuned to modern pitch.
Veramente bellissimo!
Il 2° movimento incantevole 💐👏
The use of the lute setting on the continuo harpsichorrd in the Largo is a pleasant surprise to me!
Hubiera preferido un laud de verdad jajaja pero bueno, este también se escucha muy bien 👍
merveilleux , une interprétation sublime du concerto bwv 1043 merci
This is perfection.
#415ISDAWAE
DA WAE OF BAROQUE MA BRODDAH!!
#415ISDAWAE
Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well, fellow Twosetter.
No Vibrato, No Glissando, #415ISDAWAE
Why hello there fellow two setter.
Thank you for so much pleasure of Bach!
El mayor artista de todos los tiempos, el único y verdadero Dios... todos los calificativos no bastan para describir Su obra.
Amazing!!! You have earned another subscriber. :D
Very inspiring!
Thanks for this!
¡ Oh ! con qué alcurnia de dorado brillo se establece este devenir en llamas dentro de mí. Es la gloria imperecedera de un dios hecho hombre. Y que regala el esfuerzo del genio creador para los parabienes del sujeto trascendental.
Extraordinário!!!!
🔥💯👍🔥💯
Is this meant to be a philologically accurate rendering altogether? I love the tempo of the first movement, that's why I'm asking.
It is.
11:03 allegro
yOu haVE tO uSE baRoquE tuNIng
Yes, you do and there is a very important reason why.
@@spiritsplice which is?
@@dantem4119 It's because often, composers are not only writing with theory and/or counterpoint in mind, but the temperament. A skilled composer of this period would understand the nuances of the tuning and temperament they are using and can make compositional choices of such. In this case, bach would've been writing in the context of well temperament, basing musical choices off how intervals in this temperament would interact. Using equal temperament gets rid of this expression. No trouble though.
@Inspector Spectacles quite the cold take tbh
So baroque
Third movement a bit rushed for my taste. Grew up on Menuhin and Ferras. Any ideas which recording I might enjoy best?
700th like on dis video
Why not a continuo organ instead of harpsichord?
YoU hAvE PeRfEcT PiTcH , DoNt yOu?
What's the point of using period instruments if you're still going to use 12tet? Very lazy.