These Whales Officially CONFIRM the Biblical Flood - (Ken) Ham & AiG News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лют 2024
- == Go to ground.news/paulogia to see through media bias and know where your news is coming from. Subscribe through my link to get 40% unlimited access this month only. ==
Paulogia does a survey of recent Answers News episodes featuring such stories as Blue-Fin Whale Hybrids Are More Common Than We Thought, Appeals court blocks Biden from forcing emergency room doctors to perform abortions, Religious ‘Nones’ in America: Who They Are and What They Believe, Scientists Created a Monkey With Two Different Sets of DNA, and Russian geneticist fired after claiming humans lived to 900 years before biblical flood.
Original Videos -
• These Whales Officiall...
• This New Survey Reveal...
• They FIRED Him After C...
• Evolutionists SCRAMBLE...
• Woman on Hormone Thera...
Support Paulogia at
/ paulogia
www.paypal.me/paulogia
Paulogia Channel Wish-List
www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/...
Paulogia Merch
teespring.com/stores/paulogia
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @paulogia
Paulogia Audio-Only-Version Podcast
paulogia.buzzsprout.com
Follow Paulogia at
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0
/ discord
Send me cool mail!
Paulogia
PO Box 1350
Lantz Stn Main, NS
B2S 1A0
Canada - Наука та технологія
== Go to ground.news/paulogia to see through media bias and know where your news is coming from. Subscribe through my link to get 40% unlimited access this month only. ==
Jesus power proof❤. Starting
Most sheep are weak minded.lead by their following. Like believe in adventures beyond lower orbit.
@@raya.p.l5919 You may want to let your bot go through grammar school before posting again.
@@QuintarFarenor u better check your chakras I'm shutting them down. Level 10 projecting thought an memory. Yr kind will b the dinosaur jail's Hell's hallway healthcare hallways Jack's history handle hahahahahah
J Power respect❤. Time is near
No excuses yr choice always
The Milky Way boba fett
It will last 7 days an 7 hours to the second
@@raya.p.l5919 Considering this gives his video attention, I don't care that you're a bot.
The fact that AiG News exists is proof that churches need to be taxed.
Yes indeed.
The same as the science fiction fantasy that is Scientology.
_Yet it gets treated as a legit religion._
I don't believe ANY organization should be tax-exempt. If they have income, they should pay some tax on it.
@laskowski6660 Could not agree more.
Churches like to brag about how honest they are, but the fact that _they refuse to willingly volunteer to reveal their income,_ shows just how empty their claims of "honesty" really are.
What is scientism? How do you define it? @@moodyrick8503
@@stefanlaskowski6660We do have non-profits for a reason, it's just that churches get their only special section where they don't have to report many things and have a bunch of extra perks.
Quite bothersome of creationists to always say the Bible calls people to be good stewards. No, it says to subdue and dominate the earth. Try to explain how those are synonymous
You may have heard of the term “doublethink” before
It says both because the bible is not univocal.
@@Nick-o-time It literally says one and not the other. If people infer other meanings on it then that is their own thoughts not what the book says.
And then they’ll say “God won’t let the earth be destroyed so don’t worry” when they can’t deny the evidence anymore. This stuff is actually dangerous.
@@cooscoe There is actually a scriptural basis for the idea of stewardship, though we've mostly seen the second chapter of Genesis cited in that regard, so make of that what you will regarding its strength and validity.
What is it with people being outraged that someone is required to do things in the job description of the job they chose? If you don't want to do the job, don't apply for the job.
Volunteering to make church coffee and working at a food pantry for the county are two very different things. I have done both.
Evangelicals definitely understand incestuous breeding...because the Bible tells us so. Oddly, they question this as being impossible.
Incest is immoral, unless God commands it, then it's fine. Also morality is objective, and comes from God.
@@bskec2177 Most people are FAR more moral than those who claim "morality is objective, and comes from God."
@@bskec2177 What a disgusting assertion.
@@bskec2177 the fact that you can say something is immoral unless your god says so inherently proves that morality cannot be objective.
@@TFStudios Dude, I know, I was attempting to demonstrate the incoherence of the Christian theists position.
Paul, it is 8:44 AM here and I've been up all night, you can't just post this suddenly. I have to watch it now. I can't miss my Ham and AiGs
Thank you for what you do
Hope you're able to sleep well soon. Take care
I'm watching it three hours after Paul posted it and it's 7:00 am here!
sounds like part of an English cooked breakfast
Thanks guys I got some great sleep after finishing my Ham and AiGs
Gotta love how when any other worldview asserts supernaturally long lives, suddenly its an obvious exaggeration... but the Adam story is more real than all of science. Gotcha, AiG.
11:20 I don't see any doctor BLINDLY takin someone claiming thier abortion is an emergency lol that dosnt happen
It happens only in the minds of the far right weirdos.
23:38 From context, they were talking about "spontaneous abortion" that is miscarriage not medical abortion. So this is completely unrelated.
It looks like in some places miscarriage is going to be investigated as an unsolved crime. Stripping any last vestiges of compassion from (some) religion ... that’s bound to go well for society. 😔
exactly. And prolifers have no answer for the potentially 40% of fertilised eggs that are spontaneous abortions due to incompatibility or whatever default biological process - would God be that wasteful with new persons?
"When you don't know stuff about Evolution, Evolution doesn't make sense!" part 5676 😂
Even when I was a child with almost no knowledge of evolution the basic idea always made sense to me. Animals have kids. The kids vary very, very slightly from their parents. The variations that can survive better in their environment have more offspring. Rinse and repeat millions of times and you have diversity.
The problem here is not that they're unable to understand. It's that they're unwilling.
@@Finckelstein That's correct. Evolution is pretty much inevitable. In order for evolution to not exist, something would need to exist to prevent species to change over time.
@@Finckelstein The problem is they want to teach our kids this rubbish instead of actual science.
29:02 When he said "...the eyewitness testimony of God himself," I could no longer stay quiet behind my smirk. That was the funniest thing I'd heard in a long, long time!
So, God sat down and gave a deposition to some scribe, huh? Wouldn't that be a spectacular event to add to the story?
lmao just when you think you've heard everything, they show up with a new banger
@@trishamason1855
Great point!
Ugh, I am never quite prepared for the "heads I win, tails you lose" sort of thinking that these AiG fools engage in. How anyone can so consistently look at things that any honest and intelligent person would immediately recognize as disproving their ideas and say "see, this proves I'm right!" is something I may never understand.
Regarding the emergency room abortions, these people aren't dumb. They know the circumstances behind the enforcement of the emergency care law. The fact that they are *knowingly* misrepresenting the truth in order to manipulate their viewers and feel justified in doing so is all you need to know about them and what you need to keep firmly in mind when watching.
Bearing false witness for Jesus is endemic among apologists and shows just how weak their position is.
I’m glad Paul does this and not me. I’d lose my shit on these ignorant people. I can feel my blood pressure going up listening AiG people.
Same here!
16:04 when I was a Christian, I believed that we were commanded to have compassion for non-believers and to hope, pray for, and serve them, that, one day, they might find the love of God and turn to him. I wasn’t immune to what I see here, but I did believe that sitting around boasting of how profoundly dumb non-believers are, or mocking how fervent they are in their disbelief, was itself dumb. Even now, 30 years on, I don’t understand this Mean Girls version of being a light in the darkness.
It's one of the reasons why I left the church and led me to becoming an atheist
The use of "evolutionist" and "kind" are extremely strong signs that nonsense follows.
Indeed
Let’s not forget the ole doozy that evolution is just a “theory”
I now have irrational reactions whenever I hear "kind" even if it's as simple as, "That's not really my *kind* of thing." My body instantly braces itself for creationist tomfoolery that may or may not come. As for "evolutionist", I've only ever heard creationists use that term, so my brace rate is at 100% accuracy for that so far.
Dont forget "evidences"
When the only tool you got is the bible, everything looks like a worldwide flood.
Brilliant!
- or the end times.
@InigoMontoya- the flood was the OG end times. The 2nd coming is end time's part 3 according to these guys.
But the flood was no big deal because it was THEIR GOD who did it! 😊
If it was some Hindu god(s) stunt it would have been EEEEEEEEVIL! 😡
@@MrDalisclocknooooo the end times is NOT the rapture what TF, you don’t know your Bible nor your extreme fundamentalist xtians. You’ve got the Antichrist and all the violent end times stuff AFTER the rapture. The rapture isn’t somehow the end. That’s the BEGINNING of the Antichrist’s reign blah blah.
“Are you OK Texas?”
No…no we are definitely not.
The Nones are "not engaged with life"!? What a claim!
Loving the use of Ground News to show the facts, analytics and stats.
I just wish people making an episode long ad for it would also use it when they're not sponsored by them.
For me it got annoying really fast. Like yes, Paul is making a vid long ad, but come on, you need to tone it down at some point.
Regarding the chimeric monkey "abortions: They aren't talking about humans aborting those embryos, but about natural abortions (the failure of the implanted embryos to lead to births). The reason the researchers were concerned about such "abortions" was simply because the embryos that didn't lead to birth didn't help their research. It was just about efficiency.
Also, the only reference I see the "euthanization" was that only 1 born monkey had the desired genetic makeup, and it had to be euthanized after 10 days due to medical problems.
Wanted to say good job on explaining GFP and the chimeric mice experiments! In Neuroscience we use both of those techniques very often in both development and recovery after injuries to observe in microscopes when specific changes and cells are being expressed or unable to be expressed.
Outside of America, Noah’s Ark is viewed like the Santa Claus myth.
Kindergarten fables!
I suspect it's mostly the same within America. Evangelical fundamentalists are loud, but they're a minority overall. They're just a very cohesive voting block, so they're overrepresented in the government.
Of course, I could be wrong. A lot of us are pretty dumb.
I'm from the Bible Belt, but somehow only discovered that people actually take it literally a few years ago. I guess in my incredulity I never considered to ask whether people thought it was serious.
All plants dont have seed, ferns and mosses dont have flowers and some plants multiply by rhizomes or tubers.
Mushroom have spores and some fungi are half animal, half plant, and have over 25 000 "gender", if go with how people usually determine those .
I would agree that it is most prevalent there, but there are evangelical churches in my hometown in Scotland who are young-earth creationists. I was so surprised. I have been trying to open a dialogue with them but it is exhausting. I do not have the patience and deep knowledge that Paul has!
@@pete_lind All fungi are their own group, neither plant nor animal. But yes. they did oversimplify everything, as per usual for creationists.
Maybe the russian scientist was fired because, Oh I don't know.... He reached a radical conclusion based not on evidence but on mythology?
"Russian science"
Thank you Paul for pointing out how dishonestly “selective” these so called apologists are.
The gross part is the "panel" making up situations. ie. Mother decides suddenly at 6 months that she doesn't want be pregnant. What!!??
UA-cam was getting really stale and then I realized it was only giving me boring stuff so I came to see what paulogia has been up to. 🌹Hope you and shannon are well.
My elderly neighbour was cut off by the worst winter storm ( 1947). A doctor had got through to their farmhouse but couldn't get her out to hospital. When she went into labour, the baby wouldn't come. The doctor refused to try a cesarean, saying that she would certainly die from infection and maybe the baby also, while letting the baby die and then removing (him ) bit by bit would leave her able to have more children. She did have 3 more children ( same sort of age as me, friends ) and she knows it was the best decision but still, at the time she would happily have swapped her life for that sad 14 lb baby ( Hilda was a small woman ..... in 1947 a farm labourer in a moorland cottage, no radio, no telephone, no helicopters.) Sounds like the Republicans would prosecute the doctor?
Wow that's horrific she and the doctor had to go through that but I'm glad they had the option for her to live and chose it. 14lbs is unbelievably big.
There are serious risks with C-section, including blood loss and shock as well as infection.
Good to see more Ham & AiG News!
I wonder if it's more a question of being the wrong sort of Christian.
Evangelical vs Orthodox might be giving AIG some problems about offering full support
Oh look... first one here to smell some ham and eggs. Where's the bacon? And if it's Canadian bacon, and you're Canadian, is it just bacon?
Canadian pig farmer, says(that's me) Canadian bacon is called back bacon here..😊
@@larryscarr3897
As a SK prairie farm boy now living in Texas, I must pose the question...
"Why back-bacon... where's the elbow-bacon? Discrimination! Disinclusion!"
Canadian bacon? Oh, you mean ham!
@@ernestschultz5065 hams are traditionally made from shoulders, one can technically ham cure or bacon cure any pork, but back bacon curing is its own thing, done with a specific part.
I know cuz, I hate it..and never do it.
@@parkjammer cuz good bacon is made with the belly cut, the back bacon comes from, "loin" cuts that run down the back.. those cuts are far better as fresh pork no "cure"(smoking, or salting or both).
Shoulder to elbow is Ham cured (salt, hot smoked)..the elbow to wrist hasn't much meat, so its usually sausaged.
Just a quick note on the chimeric monkey story - AiG is conflating the colloquial use of the word "abortion" with the medical term. In medicine, abortion refers to the expulsion of an embryo/fetus from the womb that results in its death (prior to age of viability) for any reason - it doesn't necessarily imply that the act was induced by a medical professional. This is almost certainly how the researchers were using it, so AiG's point is invalid.
Oh, right, you're Canadian. The US has this weird thing where people convince themselves that the state government doesn't count as a government. They'll talk as if state control of a thing actually is more freedom than federal control.
Another basic thing is that reproductive barriers are actually derived traits. Which means that unless there is selection pressure (such as hybrids not being as fit) such barriers don't evolve with speciation. An example of this is that in a lot of bird groups (ducks, chickens, hummingbirds, new world warbler) you can take distantly related species that might be in different genera, tribes or even subfamilies, and cross breed them relatively easily if the natural ranges of the species don't over lap. Because if the two species aren't in constant or frequent contact, there is no selection pressure to create a reproductive barrier. Another example are lions and tigers, they can reproduce but their offspring are less fit. Ligers grow too big, and tigons are too small. But since in the wild, Tigers and Lions don't come into contact (currently no range over lap, and historically they were found in different habitats when there ranges were close to each over) no physiological reproductive barrier evolved. There simply was no pressure to evolve one.
Very helpful information for understanding this topic. Thank you for sharing.
Ham and AiGs!!! My favorite breakfast treat 😁
Wow. Can you imagine a polar bear enjoying his first American bear? He be all like, "DAMN, this is the LIFE." Okay, and don't even get me started about walruses and dolphins. Say, that reminds me of a joke. What does a walrus have in common with someone shopping for Tupperware? They're both looking for a tight seal.
American bears tend to be larger at higher latitudes, the areas where their ranges overlap are at the point where their size also overlaps.
Horses and donkeys split somewhere between 8 and 15 million years ago, but they can still breed. Typically the offspring are infertile, is that the case with the flue whale?
jup. donkeys and zebra are actually more closely related than both of them are to horses. but any of them can still produce offspring
Multiple species of dolphins are known to hybridize.
I love the part where in real life they just saw humpback whales mating for the first time... and it was two boys.
🎶Baleen, Baleen, Baleen, Baaaallleeen, 🎶
Oh, we do worry about the Alabama Totsicles at AiG. Of course we do…
Shouldn’t four leaf clovers be coming rarer and rarer in backyards? Because when people find them, they pluck them out? 😇
Is it child abuse in Alabama to keep your children in a test tube in a freezer?
So they’re trying to say that whales were on the boat 🤦🏾♂️
plot twist. the ark was really a giant whale😂😂
spanish is my main languaje, hearing Paulogia speak spanish made me so happy
It's only "artistic license" when AiG does it. When other people read into the Bible their thoughts and beliefs, that's a cautionary tale about confusing the "word of God" 😂
Agreed. There's a display in the Ark Encounter headed "Ark-tistic License" which confesses their hypocrisy.
“As evolution and millions of years continue to pervade the culture, evangelical leaders are seeking new ways to merge the Bible with those views. Sadly, the church at large is enthusiastically embracing their proposals as gospel truth (see page 31). It’s never right or wise to follow man’s word as the final authority. God’s Word is still the final authority, and He expects His people to daily compare all teachings to His Word (Acts 17:11).”
Ken Ham, President/CEO, Answers in Genesis-USA
Am I being thick, or does this imply that God's people as defined by Ken Ham are not human? Or, more simply, that Ham is claiming Godhead, or at the least (and heretically) experiential gnosis of the deity's wishes?
Or again, that Ken Ham is not human? It's a puzzle.
We have got to stop letting judges and politicians making decisions and policies/laws concerning health and science since they've demonstrated that they have no f-king clue what they're talking about.
No. No, we're not OK in Texas...
Thanks for another great episode
28:56 They say all of this without any self awareness. It's like a comedy skit it's so on the nose
Pre-flood, long lives, post-flood short lives. Does that imply everyone on the The Ark was a sinner?
Best definition I'd ever heard for artistic license is "Knowing the rules well enough to break them". AiG lacks that knowledge. They believe the Sumerian kings list chronicled actual reigns? smh.
Two members of different species don’t even need to have the same number of chromosomes to interbreed and have offspring. Horses have 64 chromosomes. Donkeys have 62 chromosomes. Zebras have between 32 and 46 chromosomes depending on the specific species. And yet, there are numerous cases of hybrids between the species. There are plenty of similar examples.
So, the next time somebody tells you that humans having 46 chromosomes and chimpanzees having 48 chromosomes would prohibit cross breeding, you can tell them they are clearly wrong. There are, however, still plenty of good reasons not to attempt such an experiment.
Thanks, I didn't know about the # of mismatch chromosomes between these species.
As for humans and chimpanzees, I recall a Soviet scientist around the rule of Stalin was looking to hybridize humans and some apes. It might have been gorillas instead of chimpanzees. I don't remember how much work was actually done, as opposed to grifting, but it wasn't successful.
@@user-gl5dq2dg1j I have read about the Soviet experiment a couple of times and tried to track it down. This is one of those things that I could neither confirm was true nor prove was an urban myth. Plenty of governments have spent time and money on ridiculous research projects so I would not be terribly surprised either way.
Anyone who uses the term "highly evolved" (especially relating to humans) has no understanding at all of evolution.
"Artistic License" at the Ark Museum. Ah, that explains the bulbous bow that wasn't invented until 1910 and only makes sense for a vessel with mechanical propulsion.
I love this comment because it's something I wouldn't have noticed because I know nothing about it. Now I'm resisting the urge to fall down a ship design rabbit hole; I have things to do today.
yet another example of why these people should not be allowed to talk, especially on topics they don't understand and/or interact with in bad faith.
thanks for another great video and for having the patience to listen to them.
Excellent, as always. Thank you Paul. ❤
23:30 born in Alabama, work in Mississippi, not motivated enough to learn a skill and get out. thoughts and prayers for me, yall
I've been involved in a discussion with someone who cherry picks individual studies and insists that "this overturns the narrative", while ignoring all of the other studies which show that he's wrong. It's very annoying.
The sheer ignorance of creationists is always astounding
The next time someone says Merriam-Webster says, Imma gonna scream.
The whole thing about the Russian that got fired made me cringe. My husband (with Cerebral Palsy) has been told that neurological damage that happened when his was hours old was “caused by sin.” The absurdity of the argument by someone that would claim belief in a loving God floored me.
The logical through line of that theology is disturbing to me, as someone that believes firmly in the importance of the ADA.
I got a 'design' proponent to admit that Pelvises were brilliantly engineered for walking - and then asked him why Whales had them. he started to try and argue that Whales were fish.
Thanks for the videos!
I was unaware they used the Gregorian calendar back in those days
15:15 no, this is called equivocation. Conflation is treating two things as identical. Equivocation is switching definitions in order to smuggle in the wrong meaning.
Merriam-Webster Definition: Conflate - to bring together, blend; to confuse. To combine into a composite whole.
@@peterost7 Yes. And? My correction stands. This logical fallacy is most accurately called equivocation. Sure, people who equivocate are performing a type of conflation. But there’s a reason you call it your phone and not an electronic device. People will know you lost your phone if you fucking say phone.
Sorry I wasn't clear. I would argue that the intent of your correction is potentially accurate while being inaccurate in how you've described conflation. There is not necessarily the treating of two things as identical, if you are confusing pieces of or fully blending two ideas together. I don't know that, especially colloquially, it's entirely incorrect to use conflation the way he did, as you can equivocate in order to conflate, much as they seem to be doing. However, I think that if we're being pedantic about the use of the words like that, then we should be pedantic about the entirety of their meanings and make sure we're basing the correction on fully stated definitions.
@@peterost7 It’s a contradiction to call something “accurate while being inaccurate”. There’s nothing inaccurate about my correction. He used the wrong word ending in ”-ation”. An easy mix up. I disagree with this alternative hypothesis of yours, that he meant to use the less specific word. He’s smart. He wasn’t being pointlessly vague. He wasn’t calling his cell phone an electronic device. He just misspoke because both words have a similar spelling and are easy to confuse for one another. This isn’t pedantry. It’s either true or false. Only Paul knows for sure which word he meant.
I would argue that you've taken that piece of my quote out of context. I said the intent was potentially accurate, referencing equivocation potentially being the right word for the situation, while the definition you used for conflation was wrong. Therefore, my correction stands. I was not contradictory in my statement and it only appears so when you extract the phrase you did from the sentence and put it away from its full context. I was suggesting that you may have been correct in what he meant while also not being correct about how to define that term. In the end, I think we're expressing similar ideas, in that what he meant is ultimately on him to convey. We can also disagree on whether or not he could have meant something else, but that argument also goes nowhere. I think we might be closer in opinion here than you seem to think, but also this probably ends up being an agree to disagree situation, as I clearly believe that there was the potential that he meant something else and you don't, and at the end of the day that's just fine.
10:38 re: EMTALA. For all intents and purposes, if a patient shows up to the ED, say, to refill a prescription, they will be triaged and (eventually) seen. A charge will be generated. For all intents and purposes, NO ONE is ever turned away from an ED because they're condition is 'not an emergency'.
True, however, if they are seeking opiates, they may not get a refill on their prescription. A lot of addicts attempt to get opiates at ER, medical personnel have become aware of this and especially if the person is habitually seeking medications. Unfortunately there is no easy answer to the drug addiction problem.
@@user-gl5dq2dg1j I'll concede the opiate point. I suspect that drug-seekers who show up at the ED will STILL be triaged and seen, so as to generate a charge.
To answer your question at around the 13-14 minute mark: Texas is never OK, Paul.
To be honest (Georgia) the idea that I am the result of billions of years of evolution and that both my dog and I are related in being "highly evolved pond scum" just sounds badass.
I don't need to believe in a deity to find wonder in the universe I find myself in.
The university that awarded Georgia her PhD should revoke it.
that is ok. it is not a real univ.
@@dom11949 No it really is. Ohio State University. I'm not sure how proud they are that she is misusing her PhD.
Just had some pizza, but there is always room for some ham and eggs.
I know they didn't mention this in this specific video (at least, they haven't yet) but they usually go into "Religion people are more generous than atheist" which always confuses me.
The top 10 most generous countries (based on % of GNI) are Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Switzerland and Belgium. Of these 10 only 3 countries are outside of the top 10 when it comes to most non-religious countries, those are Denmark (at #12), Luxembourg (at #11) and Switzerland (at #23).
Not really sure how their statement fits in with the statistics
Using Kenny the tiger as an example of bad breeding was a conscious choice.
Russian scientist makes claim with no actual evidence, loses job, people whine that a guy who doesn't do his job doesn't have a job now. Shock.
Love your videos Paul
Then all whales should be able to interbreed but their logic.
I think bats should be able to breed with birds too. They are of the flying kind.
jup. imagine a dolphin breeding with a humpback😂. and yes, dolphins are whales
23:35 it’s important to realize that, in daily speech, “abortion” refers only to “elective abortion”. Abortion, originally, and still in science and medicine, refers to any cessation of embryonic development. Maybe I misheard, but I’m pretty sure the researchers are trying to reduce the number of involuntary abortions, not that some of their test subjects are going to clinics and getting elective abortions lol (
That is a very fair and important distinction that we need to make, since it could be a case of well-being of the mother/child vs the life of the mother/child. Much akin to colloquial "theory" vs scientific "theory".
Wait isn’t their whole answer to “Why does a loving God allow for terrible diseases” (including genetic ones) that our ancestor sinned?
21:48 yes, if you look at everything through a biblical lens you're going to have a lot of problems dealing with reality.
Biblical beer goggles
A Ham and AIG News day is a good day.
23:07 also since animals can't consent it's on us to minimize distress if we use them for testing. A pregnant person going for an abortion is generally going in with informed consent. And if they aren't able to for some reason or other there are still ethical standards to follow
Some bad news. Pro lifers _are_ upset about IVF embryos being destroyed. A new law in... somewhere in the USA, can't remember, can't be bothered to look it up, says that embryos are human and deserving of all the same rights as a full term baby... which may mean that embryos in that state will have to be kept and stored even after the donors die, and their great grand-children, and so on.
Personally, I'd go to the government then and say that since they changed the rules, they'd like to put up their entire catalogue of embryos for adoption and require that the _state_ look after them. I'm sure the taxpayers won't mind paying _millions_ every year to keep those embryos in cold storage forever.
28:14 Paul. That was so freaking awesome.
When people ask what I am, I say I am a Nones, nothing in particular. I cannot shake the movie Contact where a completely scientific analytical woman has an experience she cannot empirically prove. I believe there is a kind of spiritual aspect to people, but then it could be my idea of DBT as also being something spiritual. Most of the time, however, I say I just don't know because there is no proof either way and that is the closest truth I can come to about a "god". It seems to me most scripture and holy books were written to men for men by men and to keep certain men in power.
It took me an embarrassing amount of time, even given context, to realise that we were talking about "nones" and not "nuns". Teach me to listen without visuals, i guess. 🙄😄
I am surprised at Dr. Purdham for passing this kind inaccuracy off given her degrees....she surely knows better, doesnt she? I have a doctorate in a completely unrelated field and would know that there is no evolutionary timeline for complete speciation..(ie: I have known for a long time that Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo Neanderthals have bred in the distant past)...
Paul pulling out his spanish!! Love these vids!!!!
30:20 this segment is setting off alarm bells. Do we know there aren't Christian Russian oligarchs donating to AiG?
AS does charity. Contributing to a church is considered "charity", so christians give to charities more than non religious.
These people need serious help. UGH.
If I'm not mistaken, the florescent jellyfish protein is produced by a section of jellyfish DNA that is inserted into the DNA of one set of monkey cells used to make the chimera. The implication of this goes way beyond fin whale/blue whale hybridization.
they did the same with fish. when they breed now the babies will even be glowing.
love these episodes.
listened whilst dog walking so only commenting once home...
1. Alabama embryo ruling - you referred to a patient dropping the container on the floor potentially held liable. WTH is a patient doing handling the stored embryos anyway??
2. Russian YEC losing job - of course they don't stand with him, he is not evangelical literalists like they are. Firstly he is Russian (note the 'we don't know what was said as its all in Russian' comment by AiG) and then he is presumably part of the Orthodox Church since they spoke up for him. American right wing evangelicals are anti Catholic; who knows how much worse they view the various eastern orthodox churches which must seem even more distant ritually.
1. You are correct about WTH was someone who isn't part of the institution doing in the storage area. They and the institute should be held liable for time and loss of the embryos. However the use of wrongful death is a leap in logic, and the Alabama Justice who started spouting off about god should be impeached because he is obviously no longer (assuming he ever was) impartial.
2. Do evangelicals when they remember the orthodox churches even consider them christian?
It’s in Russian, only so much we can do. Not like there’s free translation apps available.
Does that AiG host not understand that the Sumerian king list is OLDER than Genesis?
Non-scientific human chimeras exist, through various mechanisms though they are extremely rare, where an individual is made up of two sets of genetic material.
Aron Ra just did a great video about whale evolution, for those interested in actual information.
Can you imagine having so little respect for your audience that you honestly believe that you have to explain why flue whales are called that after stating that they are a cross between blue whales and fin whales?
Mmmm, i was feeling a bit hungry. A heaping helping of ham n aigs hits the spot. 😋
23:00 ish... There's also the fact that in scientific literature, miscarriage is often referred to as "spontaneous abortion" on test subjects.
Most likely, this study is referring to viability of the embryos being studied, and not being as viable as naturally produced/incubated embryos.
actually the fact that they can mate is exactly what we would expect lol
Love the scientific details in these videos. You could give a new unique example every time a creationist says something stupid. Just like there are more Daves with relevant degrees that support evolution than professed scientists that oppose it.