Ancient Iceman Leaves Evolutionists STUNNED - (Ken) Ham & AiG News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 жов 2023
- == Go to ground.news/paulogia to see through media bias and know where your news is coming from. Subscribe through my link to get 30% unlimited access this month only. ==
Paulogia does a survey of recent Answers News episodes featuring such stories as a new look at Ötzi the Iceman’s DNA reveals new ancestry and other surprises, Ancient Skull Found in China Is Unlike Any Human Seen Before, Nickelodeon hires radical LGBT activist to create ‘non-binary’ character for ‘Paw Patrol’ spin-off, 113-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Tracks Have Been Revealed In Texas After A Drought and a rare spotless giraffe was born in a Tennessee zoo.
Original Videos -
• Ancient Iceman Leaves ...
• Scientists Discover a ...
• This DANGEROUS New Phi...
• Secular Scientists Are...
• ChatGPT Generates Fake...
Support Paulogia at
/ paulogia
www.paypal.me/paulogia
Paulogia Channel Wish-List
www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/...
Paulogia Merch
teespring.com/stores/paulogia
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @paulogia
Paulogia Audio-Only-Version Podcast
paulogia.buzzsprout.com
Follow Paulogia at
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0
/ discord
Send me cool mail!
Paulogia
PO Box 1350
Lantz Stn Main, NS
B2S 1A0
Canada - Наука та технологія
== Go to ground.news/paulogia to see through media bias and know where your news is coming from. Subscribe through my link to get 30% unlimited access this month only. ==
All i here from those on that video Paulogia is a racist attack on Australian Aboriginal's.
Go there to see media bias through the lense of media bias. Ground news is in itself biased, and the way it categorises news outlets as having only one form of bias (left/right), rather than listing what bias they have on specific subjects (along with biases along the vertical axis of the political compass of authoritarian/libertarian, as well as economic biases such as capitalist/anti-capitalist, pro-worker/pro-business etc) makes the tool unreliable and ultimately pointless, and just a way to profit from and perpetuate many people's simplistic and sectarian view of politics and beliefs.
In my opinion it is ruining your videos where you have to continuously refer back to it for the sake of a sponsorship, while continually inaccurately referring to it as a way to help sort biases when it is not.
A half an hour ad for Ground News? Seriously? You used to be better than that. I'm disappointed.
@@pelotonpro048 100% agree. I'm very much done with all this advertising
@@pelotonpro048 Good luck getting any responses other than this. The other comments including mine are getting hidden in response
*_"We separate fact from fiction here, so we start with the biblical world view..."_* 🤣 this will become my all-time favourite!
Once again the Creationists make a hilarious attempt at spin! 😂
"lets separate the fact from the fiction" immediately refers to mythology
They do separate facts from fiction... but then they keep the fiction and throw away the facts.
B-b-b-but W-William Lane Craig says it's Mytho-*history*!
@@Dragoderian move aside Fake News, i introduce to you the Fake Olds.
Of course AIG hates science, because science is always evolving.
And they hate science because it drives the 21st century. They can only twist their favorite Iron Age stories so much to try to make them relevant to the 21st century. Any more than that and they would have to concede that those stories aren’t actually literal, but mythical.
It also shows up their worldview as total BS. 😂
Actually, AIG hates science because it cuts into Ken Ham's revenue stream. 🤑
Creationists operate on the principle of "Everything I need to know I learned in kindergarten."
Ba dum tss
I refuse to believe that Ken Ham is the same species as me
Don't worry, he's clearly an Australopithecine
@@Hailfire08 good one
Yeah? That's kind of Ken Ham of you isn't it?
When "they" added an extra sapient to the human classification, it wasn't intended for him.
Well.... he did look like a Neanderthal in his younger years
It's super convenient how they get to just dismiss data with a virtual wave of the hand. "Well, first off, we can ignore all this stuff because we can just assert it's wrong. Because Bible. And we have to stuff everything into our preferred timeline. Because Bible. Then we get to insinuate scientists who accept evolution are doing sloppy work because of biases. Which we don't have, of course. Because Bible."
Yup. They just wave their hands and completely dismiss all scientific study and how science works. Why? Just as you said... "Because Bible."
"Drrr world view drrr!" :D
And yet, ask them to provide evidence that the Buy-Bull is factual, and their answer... ...
is in Genesis. IE, the Buy-Bull.
Despite all the contradictions IN said Buy-Bull.
_We've tried nothing, and we were always proven wrong. This proves we're right!_
I remembered halfway through writing that that it was exactly the kind of thing some wannabe apologist calling himself _Truth Bomb_ told my now-former-YEC friend while I was talking him out of his ignorance. "Yes, he proved everything I said was incorrect. That's how you know I'm right." I probably still have the email somewhere, too.
@@EdwardHowton I've seen that idea plenty!
Georgia completely broke the "irony meter" when she had a problem with eyewitness testimony.
But “evolutionist” ARE stunned…stunned that people cherry pick or ignore the science.
At this point, I'm stunned when I meet someone who doesn't.
@@CommanderziffRight?!? Even the Catholic and Mormon church recognize evolutionary biology and old earth.
I was a teaching assistant for a human origins class. I was first shocked then dismayed at the crap students would put on essay tests attacking evolution....in a class based on evolution ....there were alot of students very determined to ignore all evidence
Yep, the way these grifters twist the evidence is stunning. Disgraceful that they prey on people's ignorance like this.
I think AIG likes this quote from Lewis Carroll and Alice in Wonderland way too much: "Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
😂😂👍🏻
I like when they believe 2 impossible things at once which are impossible in different ways. My favorite example is that we need the population to double every 150 years from Noah (8 to 16 to 32, etc.) and in a separate article we need the Noah's grandson to have enough humans to build the pyramids after only 150 years (10 to 30,000?!).
"They usually get washed away by rain" right after agreeing that they "had to be made during the flood".
Great work guys.
22:40
I think what's even crazier is she says they'll usually get washed away _when the river fills back up_
With what, you might ask? No answer, just heading straight to "the flood is the only way these prints could've been buried fast enough to survive"
@@ferociousfeind8538 Precisely. "Flood did it" is such an ingrained thought-stopper, that they can't even recognise when they're actively describing what floods do.
NOT ONE BELIEVER HAS ACTUALLY THOUGHT ABOUT THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF NOAH'S ARK OF DEATH..
NOT ONE PERSON CONSIDERED FOOD SUPPLY, WASTE REMOVAL, AND OF COURSE, METHANE GAS PRODUCTION....FACTS BE DAMMED, THE STORY MUST BE 'TRUE' BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID IT WAS...
**BARF**
Really want to screw with a Flood proponent? The amount of water necessary for the Biblical flood, is roughly equivalent mass to Pluto. It's something like 6.5 billion cubic meters of water. It would be a planetary impact event, much larger than the asteroid that caused the dinosaur extinction.
Divide the mass of water over several months, you still have enough downward force to heat the surface temperature beyond the point where water molecules split into elemental hydrogen and oxygen, and then auto-ignite, and recombine into water vapor, and then immediately split again, etc.
The global flood, is a hydrogen-oxygen fissioning event, across the entire surface of the planet, for more than a month. That's like dropping hydrogen bombs on every inch of surface, for a month.
The Biblical Flood, would glass the surface of the planet.
Even if the water didn't burn, it's still way more force than water jet saws, and those things can cut through steel plates. Was the arc made out of adamantium? Vibranium might work too.
According to the calculations I found, the Flood would increase the surface temperature of Earth to somewhere around 3000C
Let's face it folks. These are not "christians", they are Evangelicals. This means they do not wish to follow the teachings of this "christ" figure. Rather they worship the stories of an ancient anthology as "Truth(tm)", picking and choosing those beLIEfs that makes them stand out as "religious".
If only they would put their efforts into making the world a better place though compassion, hard work, helping others and generally looking for ways to improve themselves, each other and the world. Alas, they think their "personal relationship with jesus" is the Silly Wanker golden ticket to a heavenly Chocolate Factory that doesn't exist...but its an idea that sells for a lot of money and draws a crowd.
That would explain backing Trump. Even after multiple "not very Christian" like behaviors.
"Teaching of their Christ" . . . which teachings? They are contradictory as the person who is writing that Christ Guy determines what that Christ Guy wants... there are passages about shunning family in order to love him... there are passages about him not changing the laws, but fulfilling them (like the ones regarding selling of daughters)... there are passages about not bringing peace, but a sword...
So... what Christ are you talking about?
It's really sad that the need to justify what their religion tells them to believe completely cancels out their common sense
Well common to them sense. It's not the same as other groups common to then sense. Most sense is not that common.
"It has been seen that common sense is not good enough as a lighthouse for keeping one safe from being broken against the overhanging slope of sharp logic."
-P.H. Nidditch
Yes, Thinking is critical because sense is not common.
Religion doesn't really cancel a person's common sense, because if they had any common sense to begin with they wouldn't be religious.
common sense is so rare it's practically a super-power
It will never not be jarring to me to hear someone talk about the flood/babel like historical landmarks like the fall of Rome
Paul: "My personal knowledge ends with dora the explorer"
Me: Wow, i feel old now.
Wouldn’t flash floods wash away footprints instead of preserving them? In order for the footprint to be preserved it would have to be hardened first.
Definitely, heavy rains or flash flooding are great at wiping away footprints and scattering debris.
Hey cmon your not allowed to bring logic into these things. You might make them actually think for once in their lives, their heads might literally explode from the pressure.😂
No. Flash floods would cause increased heat thus baking the prints into the ground. Trust me bro
@@davidsmith-uw2ci
Naw, logic won't actually make their heads explode. Logic won't actually make their heads do anything at all. We have historical evidence that they are entirely immune to the effects of logic.
AiG needs to go to the beach and walk in the surf and see what water and soft wet sediment do when mixed together. Hint: the prints disappear immediately.
Homosapiens are a wild species. The spectrum of intelligence alone is unbelievable.
3:39 I like how he says "You have to separate the facts from the fiction", which I definitely agree with, but then he chooses to go with the fiction and ignore the facts 😂😂😂
this type of double speak is inherent to brainwashing and oppression, it's kind of insane how normalized it has become in every day discourse.
Maybe someone should compile all the effects of this magical flood. A flood so devastating that it sorted the bodies of all creatures killed, carved the grand canyon, but was unable to wash away muddy footprints in a texas riverbed?
yeah, the Flood does a LOT of heavy lifting in their narrative
They themselves even say that the footprints could be washed away by a shower.
You don’t have to be stupid to work for AiG, but it sure helps.
Nova sciencenow did an episode on head lice and clothing lice divergence and the genetic clock dating system determined that they diverged somewhere around 170,000 years ago. In order for the clothing louse to have a niche, it had to have clothing.
Human pubic lice are most closely related to gorilla lice. Make of that what you will.
17:45. The speech here says the most about him. He believes literally everything is trying to convert a person to a specific ideology because that’s their mission. It’s pure projection. He doesn’t think commercials are just selling a product, he doesn’t think film or literature is just telling a story; he thinks there are nefarious motives to “convert you to a particular view” in every single piece of media because that’s what he does with his life.
That's a feature of his own ideology. Everyone on that program believe the exact same thing. A common Christian doctrine is that everything that doesn't exist to glorify God necessarily is in opposition to Him. I heard it for years from various pulpits when I was a Christian. Fortunately, I stopped buying that years before I left, so I wasn't completely screwed up by that propaganda.
@@zemorph42do you think peep really really believe?..
@@Think-dont-believe I know I did, and I don't believe that I am unique in this.
@@Think-dont-believe At least, I believed that until I figured out that we humans are messed up enough without needing any external encouragement. I remember thinking then that if the devil and his demons are real, they must be on vacation, because we are bad enough on our own to each other.
I GOT TO SEE OTZI LAST MONTH!!! What an exceptional museum and display in Bolzano, Italy. Mountains of knowledge gleaned from this discovery in multiple disciplines.
I AM JEALOUS!
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT IN PERSON..❤
Emma Thorne is probably your best bet for movie loving sceptic.
Oh God, how I missed Ham and aigs.
Same here!
Indeed
Once again, creationists prove that they’re too lazy to do their own research.
Well, why do research when you're going to ignore it and make up stuff anyway? Seems like a waste of time.
For heaven's sake, "suprise" is the essence of science just as much as making predictions that can be confirmed or refuted
Reminds me of that lovely old saying of Asimov's: “ The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not ‘Eureka’ but ‘That’s funny...’ ” :-)
What’s the atomic number of the element of surprise?😊
Ah, the old "Evolutionists can't explain this and are TERRIFIED" trope, regarding something that, while perhaps new and unexpected, is explainable, terrifies no one, and is not really related to evolution anyway.
3:20: "It's important that we separate the facts from fiction, so let's start with our biblical world view.." do they hear themselves??😂
AiG Canada critical thinking steps...
Step 1. If it contradicts the bible, it's wrong.
Yes, that is a play list they made a long time ago and Viced Rhino covered it.
Ancient technology is no surprise. To build a ship the size of Ken Ham's ark would take some heavy equipment, namely dinosaurs. They were used as cranes. After working all day, Noah would drive home in his car with stone wheels, although it was foot power that propelled it. His pet dinosaur would greet him at the door, and they would go for a walk together. After he put the sabre tooth cat outside for the night, the cat would jump through the window and put Noah out for the night. Otzi drowned in the flood. Some people say he was shot with an arrow, but that's a matter of faith, not science. There's no such thing as DNA. It's a hoax. David and Jonathan were gay. So what.
Yabba Dabba Doo!
It's true that every piece of media has an underlying message (otherwise known as Theme) but not every story is trying to convince you. Sometimes a story is just asking questions with no clear answers. This is a good example of creationists starting with a something true and then hijacking it to say something batshit crazy. Often the best stories are pushing the boundaries of our philosophical understanding by creating situations that reframe the more difficult issues and offer new perspectives. This kind of thinking, that all stories are selling an agenda, is how we ended up with all these book bans.
So true. They're also projecting. Because everything they do has an agenda to evangelize, they can't fathom that other people can do things (like theme & messaging) with different motives that have nothing to do with indoctrination. Even a message that wants to convince you of something isn't trying to brainwash you. It's just presenting an argument/making a case. But by distorting facts, omitting facts, and creating "facts" (partially by relying on myth), aig is not just trying to convince people, they're trying to indoctrinate people into their message that their particular brand of religion is 100% true. They're so blinded by how they interact with the world that they can't see how the world actually works.
I totally disagree. all stories have a bias, it's inherent to communication. some are biased towards the truth, and some are biased towards a specific agenda. any source that calls themselves unbiased is using that to generate unearned trust. news sources that tell you up front what their bias is tend to be much more trustworthy. propaganda is not evil in and of itself. carl sagan was a brilliant science communicator and he got there by creating a ton of propaganda to engage average people with scientific ideas. that's bias, that's propaganda, and it's also good.
I gotta love the claim that a single mating pair of cats contained all the genetic diversity present in 11 cat genera and something like 43 species. What kind of crazy cat-kind was that?
Lions and tigers and cheetahs, oh my! It's the Litigcheeteopard. Basically, they are proposing the crocoduck. There was a crockoduck that gave birth to a crocodile, and then to a duck.
We have cultural depictions of tigers, cheetahs, and domestic house cats (actually, we have mummified house cats) from about 3500 years ago, so 500 after the flood.
Yup, for YEC to work, we need super mega hyper evolution for it to remotely work.
@@shanewilson7994 Yes, but it's only evolution *within kinds,* so it's OK. /s
Creationist fantasy "Baramin" have to be all some weird genetical chimera.
A lot like the hodge podge their pseudo science hobby tries to assemble as "alternative" to good science.
@@shanewilson7994 ...even then it still fails. "...and shall reproduce after their kind". The fact that Panthera can only reproduce between it's different species and even then produce infertile off-spring suggests that not all cats are members of the "cat kind"....so according to these ridiculous, disingenuous, clowns....not all cats are actually "cats"...so which genus aren't actually "cats" ? Panthera, Felinae, or Acinonychinae? ....and within those subfamilies...there are still yet inability for some member species to reproduce with other member species.....so who between them are "the real cats" ? There are no extant members of Acinonychinae outside of African and Asian Cheetas.....so are Cheetas cats or not ?
@@jursamaj evolution within kinds slowed down due to lower amounts of water /s
I just realized how human-centric the "we found human and dinosaur footprints together" claim is. Maybe it has happened and I have just not heard of it, but have creationists ever claimed to find evidence of any modern animal besides humans living alongside dinosaurs? Dinosaur and wolf tracks? Dinosaur and deer tracks? Or are they just relying on our human tendency to seek out signs of other humans even where there aren't any?
I always want to ask Ken Ham, “Were you there?” Referring to creation or even to witness the writing of the story of creation. Just as valid as Ham asking that question about evolution. But, he needs people to believe him to continue his grift. 🤷🏼♀️
Of course, uber-religious goofballs like Ken Hamm will point to the Bible being 2000 years old and science as we know it only being a few hundred years old, or something ignorant along those lines as an automatic defense mechanism
He will just point to the bible "no i wasnt but this is why we have the word of god to tell us"
It is a question borne of sophistry. Do not evoke it.
Longtime subscriber and fan here. I just have to keep repeating this; I sincerely appreciate your videos. It's amazing the lengths you'll go to be fair in your breakdowns, and that's truly honorable. Self awareness tends to be a rarity nowadays, let alone the desire to correct personal biases (as much as possible). It's remarkable, and a phenomenal example of true journalistic integrity. We may not agree on everything (nor do we have to), but when you present ideas in this respectful way, it makes it substantially easier to have civil discussion, which is sorely needed. Keep it up Paul.
I agree, Paul is one of the best.
Well said sir. 👍
I'm just surprised AIG has a movie review show. Paulogia, you must definitely review the reviewers
Definitely want to see this. I also recall that Viced Rhino is a big fan of God Awful Movies podcast.
did they do gods not dead 4 ? :D
@@DeconvertedMan Oh, that reminds me! Prophet of Zod was watching GND4 7 times for some unholy reason. He might be interested in this as well.
Just went to watch the first episode of AiG’s “Tilt Shift” which was a critique of the movie “Free Guy.” Best moment was when Tim Chaffey agreed that he is an NPC for AiG! Paul should review these with Shannon! Or maybe a series of collaborations.
Yesss. Get Viced. I'm sure he would be down.
Creationist math: 1.3 can be 1 or 2 and 1.8 can be 1 or 2. Just depends which one suits them better.
And π is exactly 3, because the Bible tells me so in 1 Kings 7:23.
@@broddrno man among Atheists but a strawman.
1 + 2 = 4...for large values of 1.
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922 Does that mean something in English?
And, of course, 1 < 2 < 3
Oh lord…what is the matter with these people?
💲💲💲 Charlatans who found some patsies to pump them for money.
Their lord... is what's the matter.
What is wrong? Pack a lunch - this may take a while.
Nothing that a round of deprogramming cannot cure...
4:50 what nonsense. The guy was found with fire making tools, waterproof shoes and an axe. He lived 5000 years ago. We already had farming for 5000 years before that, if anything this guy was BEHIND THE TIMES.
Yep, that was a super-cringe moment. Nobody but a creationist, or an ignoramous (but I repeat myself) would say that scientists claim that people living 5,000 ybp are "brutish" or "primative". It's a complete strawman.
I do wonder how they can say some of those things with a straight face.
I "love" how when a new discovery challenges our previously held understandings creationists act like it's sime kinda gotcha while everyone else is just like "hmmm interesting lets see where this leads". Slavishly holding on to a position even when the evidence refutes it is bad science. Ironically that's what creationists think everybody else are doing. They don't get the difference between falsifying a particular discovery and an falsifying a theory.
I find Ötzi so fascinating. I wish someone would make a film based on the archeological evidence, recreating what most likely happened to him
Nova has done a documentary on utzi I think it was back in the 2000s
It would be nice to see a new one based on what the latest consensus on him is going to be. 💁♂️
I think they mean a speculative-fiction story, I think its a great idea. It could be a complex story where he is a con man that duped some tribe with a fake religion.
There was a NatGeo special on him from the 90s. I've got the vhs of it somewhere around here..
The UA-camr Stefan Milo has done something similar to this; not exactly a film, but a well-produced mini-documentary examining the possible context of his life and death based on the available evidence (and a generous but grounded dose of artistic speculation).
The Bible was written by humans. Nobody has ever been able to verify that God was involved in it in any way. Therefore AiG, by taking the Bible literally, is following man's word, not God's word.
What a way to start the day. A Paulogia take down. Great start to the morning.
Ötzi does fit the "creationist" vieuw, so it leaves the "evolutionists" stunned. Yeah! Right!
Is a bit like because I suck at math, math leaves my mathteacher stunned.
( which sort of happened, but the mathteacher was more or less stunned I was so stupid not to understand math )
That's such a good analogy for these types 😂
An LGBTQ character appears for one scene on one episode of a cartoon show...
Fundamentalist Christians: "WAAAAAAAH! WHY ARE WE BEING PERSECUTED!? WHY ARE THEY SHOVING THEIR AGENDA DOWN OUR THROATS!?"
They should read about Lascaux cave and Gobekle Tepe dates
"first we separate fact from fiction"
"obviously from a biblical standpoint..."
FACEPALM
Don’t facepalm that hard. You might give yourself a concussion.
@@kellydalstok8900 too late lol
Paw Patrol showed whale with teeth. Overall educational, my son asked why I laughed, so I explained, and we both had fun.
They had an episode where a kid was feeding a baby bear…the pups rightly said not to feed bears- then proceeded to feed and lure the baby bear several more times, with more food, while trying to get it back home! No kids or pups were mauled by an angry mama bear, of course, but if it was real life that lesson could have ended badly. Couldn’t help but wonder what most kids takeaway was- ‘feeding bears is bad’ or ‘feeding baby bears to help get them home is okay’?
17:45 "Everything you watch has an ideology they are an evangelist about, and are trying to convert you"
Im no psychologist, but I know projection when I see it lol
Please explain the evangelist ideology behind spongebob that converted me
I grew up indoctrinated with Ken ham trainings. I was shocked when I learned that there are, in fact, transitional fossils 😂
Yep, every single fossil we've ever found.
We are, sadly, only a transitional species, and will only be around until something better comes along.
Science makes the conclusion that best fits our current knowledge and technology. Sometimes, the technology advances enough that we realise that we were wrong, and we can update our conclusion.
The bible came to the wrong conclusion 4000 years ago and people like AIG absolutely refuse to update thier thinking and accept science, meaning that they are at least 4000 years out of date. While they use the technology that science has afforded us. They don't see the contradiction.
Meanwhile in panpsychism. Everything is conscious, is making a come back. It's even older. The rocks are totally tired of me moving around all the time and stacking them. How do I know? The volcano told me when it got super pissed.
I agree. However it is a reason for humility on the side of science and scientists. That is unfortunately a rare thing. Instead it seems to allow them to act as sure and arrogant as possible in any-given "now" - always free to wipe away any wrong conclusions, mistakes - even to the point of tragedy and atrocity, with nothing more than a shrug.
That is actually NOT an expectation on AiG - as they OPENLY state that their goal is to interpret the available evidence through a literal Biblical view and see if there is a way to get it to fit, when doing so.
I don't really think the Bible is a science book... even though it touches on it indirectly from time to time in some pretty marvelous ways (ocean currents discovered via a mention of "paths of the sea" in Psalms). But - viewing science through a different story doesn't bother me.
From the posters on this video alone, you'd think science was only made up of snarky, arrogant, brainwashed, mocking, bullies and children. Which I know is not the case. But it certainly doesn't present an unbiased, thoughtful community of unbiased thinkers. At all.
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922 you watch too many science communicators instead of reading the source material. They can be arrogant to people who prefer religion. They are exciting to people interested in science. They do carry bias. Everyone has bias. The Bible has produced scientific discovery. Trying to prove the earth was 6000 years old creationists discovered it was millions and possibly infinitely old. Trying to establish "kinds" a creationist discovered we are too closely related to apes to place them in a separate clade. Science has to stand against bias of all other science. If it doesn't fit it gets thrown out. Religion has to keep people convinced and destroy those they can't. Religion is a human parasite.
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922,
People have egos... nothing can change that.
@@aralornwolf3140 no, nothing can change that. But the fact that science lovers will point out themselves, that constantly having to revise incorrect positions is a benefit to science… perhaps humility is demanded, else it makes science DANGEROUS.
Enjoyed that one immensely Paul, thanks from Vancouver Island.
One of the most telling statements here, i feel, is "of couse the flood was only 4300 years (old/ago) so we have to adjust our timelines to that". The duality of examining evidence while also acknowledging that the conclusion is already decided is bizarre and honestly disturbing.
I enjoy watching their worldview slowly crumble away.
I enjoy watching them systematically destroy their own worldview by exposing how drastically it is contradicted by science and basic reasoning. You know the saying, "they are their own worst enemy."
Omg thanks for throwing Eddie Izzard in there! "Dress to Kill" is my favorite!
It is difficult to believe those people actually believe all the statements they made.
They have to, otherwise their entire social support system collapses
They actually rightly believe that their statements will make money for them!
"Believe" is a complex thing. Often it is more an emotional reaction than a reasoned process. One can believe - in the sense of feel in their heart - that the Cleveland Browns are the best football team ever, even while acknowledging their win/loss record.
@@RandyWinn42 "Believe" is a very simple thing; you hold something as true in your mind whether there is evidence to support that or not. I see a bridge/walkway/upper story floor and you say, "I believe this will support me when I go across." or "I see a bridge and I see many other cars crossing it, plus I read that it was recently inspected. I KNOW that it will support me."
@@stevepierce6467 eh, it may be that the RESULT of belief is simple - you hold a thing as true in your mind regardless of the evidence - but the REASONS that people do it are complex, and often due to emotional commitments. In the case of religions, it is often the case that people are TAUGHT to value "faith" over "reason", for example.
Excellent analysis, Paul, and a great reminder and lesson on checking the sources.❤
100% for Tilt Shift segment with Logicked or Viced Rhino a lá Toast to Toast.
I find it amusing how AiG has a show primarily to go over evidence that the Earth and humanity are older than their dogmatic interpretation of the Bible suggests, just to misrepresent and rationalize it into fitting what they want their audience to believe. It shows the depths of their insecurity and their need to keep their audience misinformed.
always assume misinformation rather than disagreement, right?
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922more like always assume grifters are lying (even to themselves).
@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922 There's a difference between principled disagreement and lying about all of the facts and data that don't support your beliefs.
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922 When they're litterally reading articles but presenting them to their audience in a way which misrepresents them to their audience I don't think it's unfair to conclude that they're engaging in misinformation. Doubly so when it's on subjects where they've been corrected or have degrees in relevant fields.
Edit to add: Perhaps you ought to be asking why isn't AiG trying to be more accurate and fair when presentating subjects to their audience?
Are there plenty of Young Earth Creationists who honestly don't know any better? Absolutely there are, that's who AiG's target audience is and they want to keep that audience for obvious reasons. But AiG has the funds and staff to know better, so why don't they try to be more accurate when informing their audience?
@@ithurtsbecauseitstrue1922
Disagreements are a matter of interpretation when there is no conclusive evidence to support either claim. Saying the earth is flat is not a matter of disagreement, because there is no evidence to support that the earth is flat. To claim that it is, contrary to the conclusive evidence, is misinformation and idiocy.
All the creationists do is say "we don't think so", but have provided no verifiable evidence to support a coherent alternate theory. When the creationist "hypothesis" can begin to make predictions of actual events the way science does, _then_ they can assert a disagreement and be taken seriously. Otherwise, it's just as much misinformation and idiocy as claiming the earth is flat.
Oh, and it's not flat, by the way. Just in case you had any doubts.
my daughter was at later end of dora's reign of terror (dora was always yelling) and my girl was like 18 months or something, just getting out words, and i was holding her and she wanted down. she started saying down in Spanish and pointing down. i was like "English please" 'down'
Ötzi was found just a few kilomoters away from my home! For anyone wondering a "Ö" is pronounced by making the sound for an english "E" but you round your lips like youd do for the letter "O"
Fuck yeah!!! Needed some great content. You rock Paul
Been using Ground News for a few months as well and it's excellent.
"I give you dominion over all of the animals that crawl or swim or fly, except for the viruses and bacteria, and those little suckers are going to wipe you out by the billions until the mid to late 20th Century and beyond" (a long forgotten verse in Genesis)....
OH PLEASE cover the AIG movie reviews!
If Answers News isn't listed as covering this article in Ground News, then Ground News can't be that great. Answers News is the ultimate source for my news.
Skeptic who likes movies recommendation: Jay Novella. Really anyone from Skeptics Guide to the Universe, but Jay is probably the best fit. Lead with the fact that you worked on Star Wars. You'll have him hooked immediately.
I definitely want to see those movie reviews!! Those sound hilariously ripe for content.
Did anyone else feel personally attacked when Paul pointed out 2006 was 17 years ago?
Ouch....
Haven't had a helping of Ham and AiGs in a while, myself, but I'm ready for breakfast 🍳
One way to test their theory about massive genetic packing after the flood is to genotype ancient skeletons, where you would expect literally more DNA
I'm bigly impressed with the ad product actually being used in the video in a relevant way, if I read or cared about the news, I would look into this lol
does anyone else sing along with the theme song on every episode of ham and egg news?
Even my kids sing along…
Oh the irony, Georgia talking about giraffe inbreeding, and yet she thinks all of the humans came from two people, and yet very few people with webbed hands and feet, and a Hapsburg chin.
A little Hamm-ology! What a way to start the day.
Thanks Paul. Keep up the good work.
It’s not just that they want their audience to blindly follow their opinions and see everything through a “biblical worldview”, but also the blatant FEAR that they constantly spout. “Watch what you watch” says they fear people will watch movies, TV shows and listen to music that says more than just “Obey”. We should all be afraid of anything that doesn’t stress “Obey”. Don’t think for yourself, definitely don’t make decisions for yourself, read this book and obey OR you will be punished. “Never not be afraid!”
WOW! It's been a while since the last Ham & AiG episode...
I always love how right wingers make mountains out of scientific molehills. It's just not that big of a deal if a study suggests some of our best guesses for timelines in archaeology or evolution are off by 10% or whatever.
At least this time the articles AiG cites do not directly contradict them. Progress or coincidence?
Movie reviews?! Oh yes, please do. 🎉
It's funny how much they harp against evolution when their model has to have actual really fast evolution to make any sense whatsoever
It's never quite the same without Ken, though he's trained his minions well. Unfortunately, they are a bit dull.
Nobody can be as dull as Ken Ham, because... oh, I see. You meant "dull boring" and not "dull stupid". Yes, I agree. At least Ken had a bit of exuberant pride in the originality of his idiocy, but these poor folks just take idiocy for granted.
Always happy to see Ham and AIG news! I would love for you to check out their movie reviews.
For the first time in years, I quit in the middle after the third advertisement for Ground News.
Hilarious how they think we're somehow "confused" by the latest findings.
God blessed me with genetic diversity just like Adam, I have 8 children and none of them look like me hallelujah!
Great content Paul ❤
It is so utterly weird to hear people talk about stuff like the ark as if it were actual factual history. It just feels bizarre.
The nephilim comment got me 💀💀
"let's separate fact from fiction"
-Says man who is holy unqualified to separate fact from fiction since he uses literal fables and folklore as his metric of reality.
"Holy unqualified, Batman!" 🤣
More Ham and Aig, Awesome!
25:01 "But we don't want to use arguments that aren't really that good."
That's news to me.
Love the Eddie Izzard clip. Fantastic stand-up.
I second that!
Usually sponsors are simply mentioned in most videos I watch, but seeing Paul actually use the product is working well for me if I'm honest. Plus, mentioning how the bias scale is developed, how to see the methodology for yourself, and that third parties are involved gives me decent confidence that the product is generally reliable. Obviously we should all carry a grain of salt for everything, but I trust that Paul has done his due diligence since he's shown us previously that he does. Interesting ad read Paul!
On topic, YECs still have nothing. Shocking. When are we, as a species, going to stop wasting money and resources on this stupid bullshit and get to solving the very real human problems we have before us? Soon I hope.
My thoughts exactly. I do have some small questions regarding this sponsor but, currently, I'm more than happy to lean towards the idea that Ground News seem to be sourcing, analysing and presenting the data in a level, well reasoned, manner. So much so that Paul appears to be genuinely using the tool in ways it's intended and that's a big tick in my book.
Cheers 🍺
Scientists are confused that Oetzi had fire lighting kit, an axe and skin boots… yeah, of course they are 😂 I learned about him as part of my degree in the 90s, absolutely nobody is surprised by that at all. It would be more surprising if he didn’t have those things. These guys are literally just making stuff up, it’s embarrassing.
LOL I used "Ham and Eggs" as a comment on one of Joel Duff's videos way back before I knew of this channel.
Lol, "Mr. Iceman to you"
Whoa, and here I thought HAM & AIGs was done with. How long has it been, again?
The Otzi case is a particular problem.
I remember when they dug the body. I never understood the very pale first artistic depictions. We had a chat with a paleontologist. It never made sense, the skin was abnormaly tanned even after the "ice burn".
It was a hammered bronze axe, btw, Paul. The head scratching element is actually the stone knife.
Édit : omg sorry hammered COPPER, NOT BRONZE ! Thank you !
Copper axe isn’t it? He predates the Bronze Age
@@molybdomancer195 So sorry yes hammered, and not even properly melted to begin with, copper !
Oh I understand the initial artistic depictions - never underestimate the power of racism in Western European, US, and Canadian societies.
@@SadisticSenpai61 I THINK it was motivated by a low correlation between some suspected presence of milky products and the predominance of the correspondant mutation in very pale ethnicities but it is not as caricaturally a 1 to 1 than the first rendition supposed. And there were already questions because of the skin left that did not match. I know the frost has been mentionned but the description was more prudent than the picture.
And what I REALLY don't get is there were no such problems with Cheddar Man or that 8000 old english girl.
I dugged and I found out. The milk product traces could not have been from his own meals ! They found out in 2012 that Otzi did NOT have the lactose tolerance mutation.
OK it was not straight up racism, it was misinformation and lack of datas. Still not good but not to the point of dumb.
Still no clue why there were different technological levels in Otzi equipment though. The arrow heads were very paleolithic, so was his knife (on top of being broken) and then his axe is hammered polished copper. They suspect he was an important personn due to that axe... And because he was murdered. The arrows, we guessed. He died while crafting them, they are unfinished. But why the knife ?
The amount of information all crammed into a single episode is amazing. I always enjoy your videos.