Real Time with Bill Maher: Overtime - Episode

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2013
  • Subscribe to the Real Time UA-cam: itsh.bo/10r5A1B
    Catch a peek at what happened on Real Time with Bill Maher after the show, only on HBO.
    Connect with Real Time Online:
    Find Real Time on Facebook: / maher
    Find Real Time on Twitter: / realtimers
    Find Real Time with Bill Maher Official Site: itsh.bo/HttKcM.
    Find Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO GO® itsh.bo/iioY87.
    Find Real Time with Bill Maher on Connect: connect.hbo.com/real-time-bill...
    Find Real Time on Instagram: / realtimers
    The Real Time blog: www.real-time-with-bill-maher-...
    It's HBO.
    Connect with HBO Online
    Find HBO on Facebook: / hbo
    Follow @HBO on Twitter: / hbo
    Find HBO on UA-cam: / hbo
    Find HBO Official Site: HBO.com
    Find HBO Connect: Connect.hbo.com
    Find HBO GO: HBOGO.com
    Find HBO on Instagram: / hbo
    Find HBO on Foursquare: Foursquare.com/hbo
    Check out other HBO Channels
    HBO: / hbo
    Game of Thrones: / gameofthrones
    True Blood: / trueblood
    HBO Sports: / hbosports
    HBO Documentary Films: / hbodocs
    Cinemax: / cinemax
    HBO Latino: / hbolatino
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 377

  • @ArmenSur
    @ArmenSur 9 років тому +127

    Mr Nawaz is brilliant, a true hero of of mankind.

    • @4lugan
      @4lugan Рік тому

      Yeah. Although if this discussion takes place in Canada, Trudeau would say -don’t say mankind, say peoplekind. Jajajjajajaj

  • @guyfromnewark
    @guyfromnewark 10 років тому +55

    At 0:28 I was like "WTF is wrong with my sound"!

  • @panterafan8888
    @panterafan8888 9 років тому +103

    An entire interview without Al Sharpton speaking. I guess there is a first time for everything.

  • @christianvennemann9008
    @christianvennemann9008 8 років тому +300

    Good thing Ben Affleck wasn't there.

    • @dazza2151
      @dazza2151 8 років тому +35

      +C. Venom I think his head would explode from all the logic.

    • @adamromero
      @adamromero 6 років тому +11

      C. Venom Wish he was there so Maajid could set his dumb ass straight.

    • @aidaaman1742
      @aidaaman1742 6 років тому +1

      +dazza2151 hahaha, so true))

    • @MrSachin8006
      @MrSachin8006 5 років тому +2

      Lol..he is so childish

    • @europaascends9530
      @europaascends9530 4 роки тому +1

      I wish he was there. Ben is a moron and a lousy actor.

  • @Gr8Layks
    @Gr8Layks 9 років тому +48

    Maajid Nawaz took this panel up a couple notches...and it was already stellar!

  • @olbear303
    @olbear303 10 років тому +150

    This panel needs Hitchens..... God I miss him

    • @jeremyscott465
      @jeremyscott465 9 років тому +5

      +olbear303 Dawkins is far too kind. Hitchens would have never listened to the babble from the Muslim man on the panel.

    • @Ramidemi710
      @Ramidemi710 8 років тому +19

      +Superman13195 I dont think either of those are morons but Maajid is right. The Islamic terrorism problem can't be solved by debates about logic and facts. Most muslims and religious people in general believe because of emotional reasons. That means we need insiders like Maajid to defuse this situation. Just "being right" doesn't change anything.

    • @_Simkim
      @_Simkim 5 років тому

      I realise it's been five years... but I see what you did there.

  • @civilape
    @civilape 10 років тому +54

    A great conversation, loved it. Also, I must say that Maajid was fucking rocking that suit.

    • @aminman15
      @aminman15 10 років тому +4

      mcgovern1888 Blondie would definitely agree!

  • @troublebunnie
    @troublebunnie 10 років тому +52

    I could listen to Nawaz read the phone book :

    • @TheRhinehart86
      @TheRhinehart86 10 років тому +9

      You sound like someone who enjoys intellectual nourishment.

  • @CyeOutsider
    @CyeOutsider 9 років тому +60

    Majid is verygood on the issue of Islamic terrorism. He is one of the few people who can articulate the difference between Islam the relgion and Islam the violent reactionary ideology. Politicians and people on the left (though not all) need to stop saying that the things ISIS and Boko Haram do have "nothing to do with Islam". Of course it does. They're just very different expressions of the same thing. That needs to be acknowledged and understood.

    • @SidheKnight
      @SidheKnight 5 років тому +5

      That's right. The way I see it, the relationship between Islamist Terrorists and regular Muslims is similar to that between regular Christians and extremist Christian anti-gay death squads in Africa (funded and promoted by American Christian organizations).

    • @jamesu8033
      @jamesu8033 4 роки тому +1

      D Di P I think the whole conversation is very oversimplified and the issue is so much more nuanced then people on the left or right present it as. Islam is neither a religion of peace or a religion of war. It is a religion of people. And that’s why I like Majids viewpoint because he realises just how nuanced the whole issue is. There are many causes for Islamic terrorism and Islam is certainly one of them but also definitely not the only cause.

  • @MsBarbaraLee
    @MsBarbaraLee 10 років тому +32

    Lmfao @ Al Sharpton's face!
    Mr Nawaz is quite fascinating. I wish he had far more influence in the Middle East.

  • @skeetv123
    @skeetv123 9 років тому +48

    Al Sharpton is just sitting there in the corner getting shit on from every which angle ahahaha

    • @Gr8Layks
      @Gr8Layks 9 років тому +13

      Haha! True! He was outclassed by this group.

    • @godlesslibertarian3381
      @godlesslibertarian3381 8 років тому +8

      +Anonymous Outclassing Al Sharpton isn't hard.

    • @Gr8Layks
      @Gr8Layks 8 років тому +5

      Godless Libertarian Tru dat.

  • @mysoccerdelight1
    @mysoccerdelight1 10 років тому +30

    I actually thought my sound failed as Micheal Moore started talking

  • @CharlesvanDijk-ir6bl
    @CharlesvanDijk-ir6bl 5 років тому +8

    Richard Dawkins is a very good listener. He knows when somebody has expertise in something.

  • @aykcroid
    @aykcroid 10 років тому +20

    Al Sharpton gave a standing ovation to Maajid.

  • @otonashihanoka7938
    @otonashihanoka7938 8 років тому +79

    He is making too much sense it hurts.

    • @DocRealTalk
      @DocRealTalk 8 років тому +8

      Far left isn't the ones branding all Muslims as one group or saying jihadis do what they do purely beucase of religion. Maajid just highlighted the comlexity of the situation and the reasons why people do what they do. The last story was a great example, he convinced a jihadi not to attack Britian by proving the Britain isn't the enemy. If the guy just wanted to "attack the west" becuase of religion that wouldn't happen.

    • @artsHscience
      @artsHscience 7 років тому

      You can tell he's full of shit when he tries to blame "black and white empirical reasoning" (6:12) for the number of terrorists on the 9/11 planes that were doctors and engineers.
      He seems like a sociopath Very charming but manipulates his words to suit the audience. His biography has been torn to shreds by investigative journalists.

  • @RedroomStudios
    @RedroomStudios 10 років тому +16

    what an amazing panel... this discussion could have went on for hours.

  • @topher2seattle
    @topher2seattle 10 років тому +65

    seems al sharpton was a fish out of water there on that panel.

    • @Mrmidtown1
      @Mrmidtown1 5 років тому +2

      5 years late - Don't know if you're still with us, Topher, but I hope so. Not hard to make Sharpton feel that way without his writers and producers. Even with them it's iffy.

    • @vitatang904
      @vitatang904 4 роки тому

      LOL coz there was nothing he can blame Racist on their conversation

    • @jumustube
      @jumustube 4 роки тому

      @@vitatang904 True.... is he able to talk without yelling ? Just wondering...

  • @FutureAbe
    @FutureAbe 7 років тому +14

    Maajid is just fantastic

  • @wolfstar675
    @wolfstar675 8 років тому +35

    I'm starting to hate how the audience applaud after someone finishes talking.

    • @MrLasso15
      @MrLasso15 8 років тому +1

      +Enrique Godinez agree *audience claps*

    • @MrLasso15
      @MrLasso15 8 років тому +2

      +Enrique Godinez agree *audience claps*

  • @cmfernandez9283
    @cmfernandez9283 9 років тому +78

    Mr. Nawaz is pretty freaking hot and his accent is delicious!

  • @anjumnazir5127
    @anjumnazir5127 8 років тому +16

    Best of Bill Maher ... Maajid was aweaome

    • @artsHscience
      @artsHscience 7 років тому

      Naw, he's anti-science and a sociopath.

    • @lornalow7479
      @lornalow7479 5 років тому

      Go study, you dunce

  • @SeraphimGuard
    @SeraphimGuard 6 років тому +14

    Easily the most significant OT to date, I wish Maajid could have spoke more fully on what he touched upon.

  • @Tsnore
    @Tsnore 4 роки тому +3

    This is a great dialogue because you have people like the Rev and Plame who are rarely exposed to such .

  • @SeaToSkyImages
    @SeaToSkyImages 10 років тому +6

    A fantastic Real Time and Overtime. I love when Maher has guests like these guys/gals.

  • @jameskane8428
    @jameskane8428 10 років тому +25

    Everybody loves Maajid.

  • @nqkoi07
    @nqkoi07 7 років тому +11

    I love Dawkin's tie.

  • @samnorton4706
    @samnorton4706 4 роки тому +16

    "Why is that?" - asked to the guy whos probably most qualified to answer but Bill needs the applause so just keeps repeating "religion, religion" until they clap. If Maajid was allowed to speak on that question they might learn a thing or two.

  • @timlangenderfer7746
    @timlangenderfer7746 10 років тому +7

    9:18 i really hope this smile isnt the last thing we see from Mr. Nawaz because of the work he does and the people who hate him for it. when maher said we need 1,000 of him and dawkins patted him on the back, that made him smile hella hard. respect!

    • @Strawn149
      @Strawn149 3 роки тому +1

      I from the future. He’s still here, but the SPLC in all their wisdom added him to their hate list. He sued. He won

  • @ejrobinson
    @ejrobinson 7 років тому +2

    This was a great panel. It's episode like this that make me wish Overtime was a proper full length programme.

  • @jackmcnamara6973
    @jackmcnamara6973 7 років тому +8

    Maajid Nawaz is a legend.

  • @alnajahtelecom9315
    @alnajahtelecom9315 5 років тому +2

    richard dawking is just awesome!

  • @gunjo141
    @gunjo141 10 років тому +4

    That Maajid Nawaz guy was one of the most interesting panel guests I've seen in a while. Wish I heard more from Dawkins, but ah well.

  • @stevezisk3415
    @stevezisk3415 2 роки тому

    Al Sharptongue Looked Bewildered😅

  • @smitaddeshmukh
    @smitaddeshmukh 5 років тому +4

    Maajid extraordinary Nawaz. Need 1000s of them. So true

  • @dannyfrog
    @dannyfrog 10 років тому +2

    That was some truth and reality of life.

  • @AdamWhiteside
    @AdamWhiteside 10 років тому +2

    He was respectful of their opinions. Al Sharpton is a good man.

  • @pooch_e
    @pooch_e 10 років тому +13

    religion. Religion. RELIGION.

  • @TBFI_Botswana
    @TBFI_Botswana 10 років тому +22

    Maajid is quite a smart guy.
    Could do with a few more like him on both sides...

    • @bryansmith6780
      @bryansmith6780 4 роки тому

      he used to be an Islamist so I wouldn't go trusting everything he says , leopards and spots and all

    • @tahakarim1901
      @tahakarim1901 2 роки тому

      @@bryansmith6780 He changed his ways. He's not the man he used to be.

  • @Joebobzilla
    @Joebobzilla 10 років тому +2

    That was a great Overtime.

  • @htdart
    @htdart 10 років тому +1

    One of the best Overtimes ever.

  • @Drixidamus
    @Drixidamus 10 років тому +1

    I enjoyed hearing Mr. Nawaz.

  • @UnderTheStars-_-
    @UnderTheStars-_- 10 років тому +1

    Right on!

  • @LightInTheSky91
    @LightInTheSky91 10 років тому +1

    Mate, he's from essex. 2 hours down the road from me.

  • @BigDeanoSyd
    @BigDeanoSyd 10 років тому +1

    The problem for me is that both Ayaan and Maajid make very valid points, the truth is somewhere in-between

  • @alnajahtelecom9315
    @alnajahtelecom9315 5 років тому +1

    thanks nawaz.

  • @brvkloshar
    @brvkloshar 10 років тому +1

    very good overtime

  • @Carimbo575
    @Carimbo575 10 років тому +1

    This analysis from Maajid Nawaz is just amazing...

  • @winterlandboy
    @winterlandboy 10 років тому +1

    Mr Nawazz speaks sense and if I was President I Woukd certainly seek his counsel.Both sides Woukd do well to seek his counsel but we all know that ain't gonna happen now ..is it ?

  • @Shiggystardust
    @Shiggystardust 7 років тому +9

    GET MAAJID BACK!!!!

  • @goblinclockwerk
    @goblinclockwerk 6 років тому

    Dawkins laughing was so cute :)

  • @kelinade
    @kelinade 10 років тому +1

    damn it would have been awesome to have heard more than one person talk during that whole thing!

  • @TempestTossedWaters
    @TempestTossedWaters 10 років тому +1

    Good episode.

  • @amritsinha8185
    @amritsinha8185 4 роки тому +1

    We love you Maajid

  • @shrade4179
    @shrade4179 10 років тому +1

    Very interesting.

  • @stuzo666
    @stuzo666 2 роки тому +1

    Majidd isxa top guy, still goin strong , God bless him

  • @edwardkirkhope9072
    @edwardkirkhope9072 6 років тому +5

    We must listen to and support Maajid.

  • @Camtaine82
    @Camtaine82 10 років тому

    LOL!! Calm down, don't get your knickers in a twist, mate!!

  • @GJ1607.
    @GJ1607. 5 років тому +1

    Michael moore looks llike peter Griffin from family guy

  • @bhap1986
    @bhap1986 10 років тому

    the blonde is nodding her head and it shows she was in agreement with whatever he was saying ... it gives out a perspective of the people present there......and that is the right editing he did.....P!

  • @drm0161
    @drm0161 10 років тому +1

    good panel :)

  • @pontifice9
    @pontifice9 10 років тому +1

    Someone please upload the compelte show. I cant find it out of USA.
    Thanks.

  • @James-iz9qb
    @James-iz9qb 4 роки тому +1

    Is anyone else starting to notice that discussions even from 5-10 years ago have a markedly more relaxed and trusting feel to them? Even when people disagree on controversial issues?
    Something has really fucked with our minds- I blame social media.

    • @clarkpalace
      @clarkpalace Рік тому

      So true. And we thought 911 changed everything! Trumpism has changed everything. Nov 2022

  • @226somnathdey
    @226somnathdey 2 роки тому

    When the lady says to Majid "keep working on it", typical patronizing tone.

  • @MrLee-hd5ks
    @MrLee-hd5ks 10 років тому

    WoW! Send this Guy out on the Circuit ! Fantastic explanation of what is wrong with the Radical Youth's. Well done my Friend.

  • @wullebulle123
    @wullebulle123 10 років тому +1

    BILL, COULD YOU PLEASE EXTEND OVERTIME TO 30 MINUTES?
    this panel was just to awesome to let them go so soon

    • @clarkpalace
      @clarkpalace Рік тому

      9 yrs later, OT is seven minutes. But this panel was gold. Nov. 2022

  • @Jeremyramone
    @Jeremyramone 10 років тому

    perhaps, but to prevent it from pervading into govt. politics, public education and social policy is vital.

  • @powerbottomboi5255
    @powerbottomboi5255 2 роки тому

    As an 18 year old in Oklahoma “the bible belt” I can confirm most people my age don’t give a hoot about religion.

  • @rockoo2112
    @rockoo2112 10 років тому +1

    Yeah, he seems like a ray of hope from the heavens even for an atheist! LOL
    I was really glad with Bills closing statement! too!

  • @sjoyce100
    @sjoyce100 10 років тому

    i actually went for the volume bar for a split second

  • @philiphoward1731
    @philiphoward1731 6 років тому

    What happened to The sound when Michael Moore try to say something

  • @AlexPryrodny
    @AlexPryrodny 10 років тому +4

    Maajid stole the show

  • @xsuploader
    @xsuploader 4 роки тому

    11 states have now legalised weed so bills point is mute

  • @luqeprisecaru8507
    @luqeprisecaru8507 3 роки тому

    nevermind the last bit!

  • @Shankar-Bhaskar
    @Shankar-Bhaskar 10 років тому

    thats the exact same thing i thought.

  • @RedroomStudios
    @RedroomStudios 10 років тому

    I agree with you. Sharpton is great on MSNBC and he rarely if ever interjects his religion into the discussion.

  • @chadedmonds2326
    @chadedmonds2326 10 років тому

    Funny how you cannot indict dead people isn't it?

  • @gatedicath
    @gatedicath 10 років тому

    If I was in my 60's and was religious I too would not acknowledge that it is a load of shit too. To think that I got out of bed every Sunday for decades for nothing would drive me to the point of insanity.

  • @imsorobo
    @imsorobo 10 років тому

    i know he does, but when bill said his name, people were laughing, so i did not want to guess his name.

  • @timlangenderfer7746
    @timlangenderfer7746 10 років тому

    if i could smoke weed with 5 people now, bill maher and richard dawkins would be 2 of those people. great episode! i love both those guys!

    • @clarkpalace
      @clarkpalace Рік тому

      Well dumbass u will get your wish, virtually. Bill will have a dawkins episode on club random. I say dumbass, which may not be fair, but i notice too many CR viewers are so desperate to party they only like the party side of loosey goosey bill. But you dont know that yet. U blast from the past. Nov. 2022

  • @alphacause
    @alphacause 10 років тому

    Having watched the debate that Al Sharpton had with Christopher Hitchens on the subject of religion, I can see why he would be so reluctant to argue against atheists, especially when you have such and educated one as Richard Dawkins on the panel. Hitchens, as he did to so many of his adversaries, utterly decimated Sharpton, and made him look like a child on stage. After being so thoroughly defeated, I think Sharpton has learned to be cautious around learned skeptical people.

  • @jlodge1
    @jlodge1 3 роки тому

    Did I miss Al Sharpton’s convo?

  • @webbess1
    @webbess1 10 років тому

    What kind of tie is Dawkins wearing?? :P

  • @1313elsanto
    @1313elsanto 10 років тому

    That sounds reasonable enough...

  • @jonathancortez5208
    @jonathancortez5208 7 років тому +1

    Moore just repeats what the masses say.

  • @rza1m
    @rza1m 10 років тому +1

    Exodus 32:27 ". . . Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour."
    Ezekiel 9:6 "Slay utterly old and young, both maids, and little children, and women . . . "
    Isaiah 13:16 "Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished."

  • @wrathofme03
    @wrathofme03 10 років тому

    he's good for making clever statements with words....not much else I think.

  • @jakobxp5728
    @jakobxp5728 9 років тому

    YE YE YE POT IS LEGAL NOW!!! WEeeoOOEOeooeoeOoOO!

  • @colmonhs
    @colmonhs 10 років тому +1

    Sigh..
    He's not an arab...he's a Brit of Pakistani decent.

  • @SDG.12
    @SDG.12 10 років тому

    Ok cool. If we are gonna play missing-the-point, I have no intention either...later.

  • @PasadenaMMZ
    @PasadenaMMZ 10 років тому +1

    Fair point, but I have a hard time believing that all portrayals of Islamic society are caricatures. I think that polygamy is an issue. I have the same issue with polygamy that I do with an over-concentration of wealth. And, some may argue that polygamy is even more damaging. Polygamy creates a deficit of women which means that there are large amounts of men that will never fulfill their biological objective. These are the men that can be radicalized because they seek relevance.

  • @carmendebenedictis-larue6250
    @carmendebenedictis-larue6250 3 роки тому

    I went to school with the Tsarnaevs. Bill is wrong: we all saw something bad coming with Tamerlan. He had this air about him that just wasn't right... obviously we didn't expect him to bomb the marathon, but there were PLENTY of conversations between people who had met him worrying about whether he'd commit a violent crime (not a mass attack, but domestic abuse or a violent attack on a individual or something like that), there was some speculating that he might go join up with a group overseas and become a fighter over there (similar to Jihadi John or someone). The one nobody saw it coming with who i think he's referring to was Dzhokhar because he was your average High School kid, smoked frequently, super helpful, pretty personable, very into sports he played on our hockey team and all that, he had girlfriends and rarely spoke to his friends about politics or religion and when he did, he was careful to sound like we all did (he was good at hiding his real beliefs clearly), he was nuanced when he spoke...he was only overtly radical in the way that all young angsty "liberal" activist type kids are. But that was high school. after high school shit changed.
    His radicalization turning to decision to act happened way quicker and less publicly than most mass violence perpetrators. There was nothing gradual over the years that anyone i know saw or red flags even looking back now. After school ended he dove in head first. If any of his friends had seen him slowly holing himself up with Tamerlan more often and going out doing his usual stuff less, it would have been a red flag, but it kinda just suddenly was like nobody really saw him. Clearly he was getting more devoted to his views but it didn't happen in a visible way bc we weren't in contact anymore, like typical post-HS losing touch type of thing...i have to ask some people who had been in touch if they'd noticed when exactly things changed.

  • @1313elsanto
    @1313elsanto 10 років тому

    Oh I see where our misunderstanding comes from. For me, this was never a debate about religion, it was only and exclusively a matter of the appropriateness of the terms you used in your original and fairly popular comment and the implied conclusion that judging historical figures out of their historical context is a valid way to view them. My criticism of your use of the term comes more from the fact that I think it is unnecessarily incendiary and historically inadequate.

  • @mmafyasco
    @mmafyasco 10 років тому +1

    I like this brown guy!

  • @AlotaibiA
    @AlotaibiA 10 років тому +1

    9:17, that's all Nawaz ever wanted

  • @zaidsyed8187
    @zaidsyed8187 3 роки тому +1

    Not gonna lie, I'm an atheist, but I admire Maajid's deep analysis of Islam and terrorism. I don't like to believe I have the answers, and I know that social issues are very complicated and intersectional, and so I have wondered of the link between religion and terrorism, for example, and I would love to hear what he has to say in detail and contrast that to some of the ideas Hitchens and those like him have proposed which I believe to be likely to be correct as well.

  • @nathanrobbin6341
    @nathanrobbin6341 6 років тому +1

    Nawaz is a stud.

  • @ceejay9336
    @ceejay9336 10 років тому

    So it's the "us versus them" mentality. Scary.

  • @BigZ7337
    @BigZ7337 10 років тому

    This was another great overtime, although it was funny how Al Sharpton didn't want to say anything, I wonder if he feels uncomfortable about talking about religion with atheists?

  • @DenverChris
    @DenverChris 10 років тому

    hahah fucking Al Sharpton's face when Dawkins speaks

  • @SmoothCriminalAaron
    @SmoothCriminalAaron 10 років тому

    Al SHarptons Face