@@benjaminlundback8394 - No, ... they weren't. This was a late slide and, if any card at all, should have been a YC. "Studs Up" - the disgusting new mantra of parents watching their teenage boys play the game - is for those moments where the sole of the shoe is directly pointed at the opponent. This was "clearly" not that. It was a late tackle/play on the ball.
@@davidcarter2720 Completely agree with you. Even if studs were showing, the contact was minimal at most and it was low. He didn't make a lounging motion and just plainly missed the ball. This would only warrant a yellow at most.
@@gerrycollins2335 arguing with a real ref? nice. his leg was completely straight when he ran into him. that's an immediate red no matter what. the rest doesn't even matter.
Referee has to set standards early on. If he only gives yellow, then other players will tackle reckelessly and maybe even break legs and have serious injuries.
Don’t like the use of quotes for injured lol you can see the knockback on his foot and that’s from a studs up challenge I’m sure it hurt like hell lmao
That red card was a very good call. White's cleat was in the air, and got the opponent in the ankle/shin. There was a clear dangerous play in front of the white goal that wasn't called on dark 16 at 4:00.
Chris Sullivan , I know you dont know about soccer that much. It's okay though. Let me explain, if he only gives yellow, the "ref" will set a very violent game. If he gave yellow, I can see a fight between players breaking on later in the game.
You cannot say that you think somebody wasnt intentionally endangering the other players safety. BECAUSE YOU CANT SEE INTO THEIR MINDS, ALL THAT MATTERS IS THAT IT HAPPENED AND HIS SAFETY WAS AT RISK
He knew there was no way he could get to the ball (it had advanced too far away from him). He also knew the opposing player was going to kick it and instead of blocking the path the ball was going to take, he decided to "plug" (taponear) the guy..........definitely a RED CARD!
I wish I'd seen your comment before watching, it wasn't a good enough game or dramatic red card to sit through all of that. Thank you for your comment anyway.
Notice not much of an argument from the player sent off. He apologizes to his opponent and then begs the ref not to card him, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE WENT IN RECKLESSLY . A RISK HE DIDN'T NEED TO TAKE !
Referee here. Never a red card, yellow might have been appropriate. His opponent was not hurt, at all, and hammed it up a bit to help the ref make his decision. Your body will, physically, not allow you to make a rolling motion like that if you are actually hurt. When I was in referee training, many years back, I was told the easiest test to know if someone is hurt or not - "Are they moving?" If yes - not hurt. If no - potential actual injury.
Body language is so important in these situations. 5 immediately went to see if opponent was ok. Good sportsmanship by both teams. Looks like it was a well spirited game and the ref did his job. Cheers
That's red all day. Studs up challenge with contact high on the leg (above the ankle) with a high level of force and speed involved. One coaching point for the ref and AR2. The ref needed to get closer to play and AR2 needed to demonstrate more side stepping and interest in the game, his body language looks like he is not interested. However I do not know what the coaching is in the States so take my advice with a grain of salt.
Are you blind? The studs were down the whole time lmao, he’s like 50 something. It’s a u16 and he’s probably tired. Stop pretending your some refereeing god and shut your mouth.
card all the way. But that kid is REALLY hamming it up with all his flailing on the ground. Point of contact was the boot, maybe ankle and our academy award winner here is grabbing at his shin rather than the part that was actually hit.
Hilarious at 0:31 if you know spanish he said "Ahhhhhh puta culpa mia" meaning "ahhhhh all my fucking fault" anuway in my opinion from my angle i think that it was a red card i mean from my angle it seemed like that tackle was rough. If i where right there and could see the replay in slowmoe and all that i could change my mind but from this angle we have i think it was a read card but if he gave a yellow i will agree too. Anyway good video. I would like to see more of these kind of videos
NO, it wasnt Spanish. These types of moments are the ones that I thank my parents for teaching me three languages. That guy spoke in Portuguese and said "Ah, puta que pariu" that means in Spanish " Ah, la puta que me pario". In English "Ah, the bitch that gave birth!"
From video looked like ball got away from a bit and the lunge was last resort to try and play the ball. I don't think he went in with intent to injure the player but still he left his feet with studs clearly showing. My opinion is red from what I see but could change if I were doing game and seen temperament of player throughout match and the flow of game. It was a bit extra on flip by defender but he clearly got hit. From here red and plus if a yellow is given that might change whole behavior a kids believing well if he got away with it so can I. Just observing from video, great video though
Well said, just a few additions: we cannot analyze the red card just by looking at the moment of the foul. We have to see what the game and how punishments were given prior to the tackle. For example: if a similar tackle had happened before and the referee gave just a yellow, then this foul he must also give yellow. But nonetheless, that was a horrible tackle, well deserved red card.
Why do players roll on a potentially injured leg? Pretty sure that would hurt it more. One roll is natural but 5/6 is probably gonna do more damage than the actual tackle.
thats a PHAT dive lmao, no contact with either ball or player, the player even screamed in agony before he got hit, would have given a drop ball or something
Bad call, that should be a yellow for the other team. If you watch in slow mo, look carefully because the kid jumps over but simulates. I don’t see any contact, he should of played on. I’ve taken challenges worse than this, I’m 12 and play in the highest division in Utah, I’ve been tackled like that, but Refs normally give a yellow. It’s an obvious yellow if red calls a foul, because white player had no intention to hurt the green player.
Saucy_EmeraldYT There is contact in the foot and ankle portion but it is over reacting. However, the ref can only see it once and he saw studs up and a harsh challenge. That’s a red.
Saucy_EmeraldYT Also, the rules don’t care about intention. I may not intend to make a handball in the box but it is still a penalty. Same thing applies here.
pretty good job with the foul but he did try to go for the ball right before it cleared and as he did the studs up to play the ball the player kicked it away so he couldnt stop himself. i think it should have been a yellow instead of a red. white number 5 was going for the ball at the same time falling down and couldnt stop his feet from touching the black player. he even goes and check on the player.
Honestly the ref should’ve done a better job managing this match... I saw lots of things go unpunished which would’ve hypothetically improved the general mood of the players and atmosphere of the match. In my opinion this is a clear red card as it was a dangerous tackle and he showed no intent for going for the ball. IMO there needs to be stronger emphasis by coaches of the following “ONLY ATTEMPT A SLIDE TACKLE IF YOU ARE CONFIDENT YOU CAN GET THE BALL 100% OF THE TIME” There any many instances in this video even that show even kids this age have the ability to slide tackle. As for the uploader, context is appreciated but really? A 4.5 minute video for a 0.5-1 min incident?
I am South American, lived in Argentina and Brazil. And I say that's a red card all the way. See? my argument is just as valid as yours because you placed nationality in the same level as knowledge.
Doesn't matter what the intent was... he got no ball contact and slid right into the player which is a foul. Now I agree that's not a red but it is a yellow
4:09 - 4:11 is when the foul occurred. There could have been several other fouls and even cards given but the ref let them play. Good acting job by the injured player.
Being a player, I've done a tackle like this while in high school. "Luckily" for me I injured myself in a tackle that really coulda broken a guys' leg (I'm a dirty player). Had I not limped off with a sprained ankle, I 100000% should have been red carded, as this guy should have as well.
@@muhammadshakir9 Notice not much of an argument from the player sent off. He apologizes to his opponent and then begs the ref not to card him, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE WENT IN RECKLESSLY AND VIOLENTLY . A RISK HE DIDN'T NEED TO TAKE !
If we're calling the red for the dangerous play, then let's at least give a yellow to the player on the ground for simulation. Not sure he was even nicked, and he's acting like his leg is broken.
I swear ... if I hear "studs up" one more time ... This wasn't a studs-up challenge (and for SURE his cleats never made contact with the mortally wounded player). The RC was an overreaction to a late slide. "Studs Up, Referee!!" is the new "HANDS!". RIP "hands".
Play acting he caught but playing in slow mo you can see he catches his foot which were grounded. Why is he then holding his shin? Yellow card definitely but wasn't intentional at all
Referee has to set standards early on. If he only gives yellow, then other players will tackle reckelessly and maybe even break legs and have serious injuries. Dont be a chicken head
Dude Perfect JR does not matter his intentions. I agree he intended to play the ball but he did not. Instead he played the man late and connected with his studs. Clear red card foul
4:07. I just saved you 4 minutes of your life from watching poor standard teenage footballers, which you would otherwise never get back.
Thank you sir
fr
Wish I would've seen this 4 minutes sooner
i needed thoe 4 minutes
Do you want a early birthday party mommy’s cookies or a sticker?
Ball spends more time in the air than the ground
Ikr
Lol true
That was a red it was studs up no ball
Good call
In real time all the ref sees is a slide tackle with the studs up, so I don't blame him for sending the player off
Its not just in real time try slowing it Down he HAS his studs up😊
Studs up late tackle as a referee my self I completely agree with the decision
His studs weren't up though. The player fouled made a meal of it too. Maybe a yellow at most.
@@gerrycollins2335 Learn the rules and replay the situation, his studs are clearly up.
@@benjaminlundback8394 - No, ... they weren't. This was a late slide and, if any card at all, should have been a YC. "Studs Up" - the disgusting new mantra of parents watching their teenage boys play the game - is for those moments where the sole of the shoe is directly pointed at the opponent. This was "clearly" not that. It was a late tackle/play on the ball.
@@davidcarter2720 Completely agree with you. Even if studs were showing, the contact was minimal at most and it was low. He didn't make a lounging motion and just plainly missed the ball. This would only warrant a yellow at most.
@@gerrycollins2335 arguing with a real ref? nice. his leg was completely straight when he ran into him. that's an immediate red no matter what. the rest doesn't even matter.
That’s sort of in between but the ref did a good job of dealing with it
How is it in between?
I'd say that's a yellow at most, very harsh red
Better title would be "4 minutes of mediocre quality soccer, then something happens but you cant really see it."
0:58 , that really sounded like he said “what da fack!”
That's cleats up and late with no ball contact. He keeps the leg straight and uses a good amount of force. I can see a red here.
0.25 speed when it happens, now what
Referee has to set standards early on. If he only gives yellow, then other players will tackle reckelessly and maybe even break legs and have serious injuries.
That's a foot breaking tackle.
do u mean studs up, since I'm from uk
do u mean studs up, since I'm from uk
Notice how the kid that got “injured” is the one that pushed the other kid over at the start?
Don’t like the use of quotes for injured lol you can see the knockback on his foot and that’s from a studs up challenge I’m sure it hurt like hell lmao
That red card was a very good call. White's cleat was in the air, and got the opponent in the ankle/shin. There was a clear dangerous play in front of the white goal that wasn't called on dark 16 at 4:00.
Definite red. Leaves the ground and studs showing. Makes no contact with ball either.
4:10 ah!!!!!!!!!! Beep ah!!!!!!
Beautiful tackle! I love that.
Studs up, you are out
If ref sees studs hes getting a yellow or a red
this is defo bait lmao.
It should be a yellow. A little late with studs up. I don’t think he was trying to endanger the safety of the other player
Chris Sullivan so he has to be intentionally endangering the safety of an opponent?
Chris Sullivan , I know you dont know about soccer that much. It's okay though. Let me explain, if he only gives yellow, the "ref" will set a very violent game. If he gave yellow, I can see a fight between players breaking on later in the game.
You cannot say that you think somebody wasnt intentionally endangering the other players safety. BECAUSE YOU CANT SEE INTO THEIR MINDS, ALL THAT MATTERS IS THAT IT HAPPENED AND HIS SAFETY WAS AT RISK
Nah its a red all day he is no where near the ball his studs are raised so they make contact with the players shin no doubt it is a red card
Intent is irrelevant, its what happened.
He knew there was no way he could get to the ball (it had advanced too far away from him).
He also knew the opposing player was going to kick it and instead of blocking the path the ball was going to take, he decided to "plug" (taponear) the guy..........definitely a RED CARD!
agree w/ that decision, dangerous play after the ball got ahead of the player
If you see it slow motion he dives before the impact nice dive tho smart
Oh shoot, that’s on a local game! Right here on kimball in Ventura 👍
Should've been a yellow but it's hard being a ref
This is why I don’t use the Fox 40 Pearl whistle. At times I could barely hear it in the video
4:08 thank me later
It's been 6 months, I would like to say thank you.
Thanks
Thank you
thanks
I wish I'd seen your comment before watching, it wasn't a good enough game or dramatic red card to sit through all of that. Thank you for your comment anyway.
Notice not much of an argument from the player sent off. He apologizes to his opponent and then begs the ref not to card him, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE WENT IN RECKLESSLY . A RISK HE DIDN'T NEED TO TAKE !
damn it's been a while since I've seen Bruno definitely controlled his temper way more since the last time I've seen him
Even though the clip was two hours long, I knew it was going to be number 5 from minute one.
if you want to see the card just skip to 4:05
Referee here. Never a red card, yellow might have been appropriate.
His opponent was not hurt, at all, and hammed it up a bit to help the ref make his decision.
Your body will, physically, not allow you to make a rolling motion like that if you are actually hurt.
When I was in referee training, many years back, I was told the easiest test to know if someone is hurt or not - "Are they moving?"
If yes - not hurt. If no - potential actual injury.
Body language is so important in these situations. 5 immediately went to see if opponent was ok. Good sportsmanship by both teams. Looks like it was a well spirited game and the ref did his job. Cheers
Ewald Lienen's injury go search it up he moved all the time you were taught incorrectly
That's red all day. Studs up challenge with contact high on the leg (above the ankle) with a high level of force and speed involved. One coaching point for the ref and AR2. The ref needed to get closer to play and AR2 needed to demonstrate more side stepping and interest in the game, his body language looks like he is not interested. However I do not know what the coaching is in the States so take my advice with a grain of salt.
Are you blind? The studs were down the whole time lmao, he’s like 50 something. It’s a u16 and he’s probably tired. Stop pretending your some refereeing god and shut your mouth.
The wind was blowing so I couldn't tell if my stomach was growling or if it was the wind.
all ball... he flipped over the guy who tackled him
Can't blame the ref cause that's a world class dive.
2021 anyone?
Judgment call.
Lad's made a meal of it. Yellow card.
4:10 if anyone is looking for the tackle
In Turkey, this would not even be a foul.
number 3 on the white team low key fast lmaoo
card all the way. But that kid is REALLY hamming it up with all his flailing on the ground. Point of contact was the boot, maybe ankle and our academy award winner here is grabbing at his shin rather than the part that was actually hit.
I live in Oxnard and this seems to be somewhere in Ventura. What park?
Hilarious at 0:31 if you know spanish he said "Ahhhhhh puta culpa mia" meaning "ahhhhh all my fucking fault" anuway in my opinion from my angle i think that it was a red card i mean from my angle it seemed like that tackle was rough. If i where right there and could see the replay in slowmoe and all that i could change my mind but from this angle we have i think it was a read card but if he gave a yellow i will agree too. Anyway good video. I would like to see more of these kind of videos
NO, it wasnt Spanish. These types of moments are the ones that I thank my parents for teaching me three languages. That guy spoke in Portuguese and said "Ah, puta que pariu" that means in Spanish " Ah, la puta que me pario". In English "Ah, the bitch that gave birth!"
No hear it carefully
From video looked like ball got away from a bit and the lunge was last resort to try and play the ball. I don't think he went in with intent to injure the player but still he left his feet with studs clearly showing. My opinion is red from what I see but could change if I were doing game and seen temperament of player throughout match and the flow of game. It was a bit extra on flip by defender but he clearly got hit. From here red and plus if a yellow is given that might change whole behavior a kids believing well if he got away with it so can I. Just observing from video, great video though
Well said, just a few additions: we cannot analyze the red card just by looking at the moment of the foul. We have to see what the game and how punishments were given prior to the tackle. For example: if a similar tackle had happened before and the referee gave just a yellow, then this foul he must also give yellow. But nonetheless, that was a horrible tackle, well deserved red card.
The most sunday league football I've ever seen in Australia
Just another day in WA
Ehh idk about a red. That green player sold that shit hard. Looks like that's the only thing they really work on in practice
Fast Forward to 4.29 for the Card!
i love that park
Should have been a yellow imo, it was late but no studs showing no malice.. just a poor late tackle
He didn’t even touch him 😂
angus melsom you’re blind
play it in 0.25 speed.... he demolished his right foot
That a straight foul like sergio ramos red card
Good game though.
Red card is at 4:10
4:04 dora the explorer's friend?
Totally agree wih the ref's decision a straight leg into the slide tackle.
That was a shit call, a foul but nothing more
Why do players roll on a potentially injured leg? Pretty sure that would hurt it more. One roll is natural but 5/6 is probably gonna do more damage than the actual tackle.
If you put the video on .25 speed the kid said ow before he got hit
Flip of the year!?
I heard it. 😂😂
Matt Groves Yup
Yeah
That was the people on the sideline
What was that! That’s definitely not a red card. Bad call.
mAtTeR_ Hey you can ser the white players boot touch the green one’s boot, but the green player held His own leg
there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, he came in late and that’s the only reason why, at least a yellow, but in no terms a red
Hound studs up challenge is always red.
You guys are saying “well if you put it in slow motion...” okay we’ll he ref doesn’t have a Fucking slow motion button so he called what he saw
He’s gonna straight red him for that, or did he get a second yellow
thats a PHAT dive lmao, no contact with either ball or player, the player even screamed in agony before he got hit, would have given a drop ball or something
Bad call, that should be a yellow for the other team. If you watch in slow mo, look carefully because the kid jumps over but simulates. I don’t see any contact, he should of played on. I’ve taken challenges worse than this, I’m 12 and play in the highest division in Utah, I’ve been tackled like that, but Refs normally give a yellow. It’s an obvious yellow if red calls a foul, because white player had no intention to hurt the green player.
Saucy_EmeraldYT There is contact in the foot and ankle portion but it is over reacting.
However, the ref can only see it once and he saw studs up and a harsh challenge. That’s a red.
Saucy_EmeraldYT Also, the rules don’t care about intention. I may not intend to make a handball in the box but it is still a penalty. Same thing applies here.
Saucy_EmeraldYT there was contact with the ankle. The reason his leg flung back was because of the contact.
Was that shoreline
pretty good job with the foul but he did try to go for the ball right before it cleared and as he did the studs up to play the ball the player kicked it away so he couldnt stop himself. i think it should have been a yellow instead of a red. white number 5 was going for the ball at the same time falling down and couldnt stop his feet from touching the black player. he even goes and check on the player.
it was a yellow... looked like it must of been his second yellow though
@@andynewman5347it wasn't a double yellow it's a straight red which is wrong.
Dive at the end! RC
Honestly the ref should’ve done a better job managing this match... I saw lots of things go unpunished which would’ve hypothetically improved the general mood of the players and atmosphere of the match.
In my opinion this is a clear red card as it was a dangerous tackle and he showed no intent for going for the ball. IMO there needs to be stronger emphasis by coaches of the following
“ONLY ATTEMPT A SLIDE TACKLE IF YOU ARE CONFIDENT YOU CAN GET THE BALL 100% OF THE TIME”
There any many instances in this video even that show even kids this age have the ability to slide tackle.
As for the uploader, context is appreciated but really? A 4.5 minute video for a 0.5-1 min incident?
That’s the kimball park I used to play there soccer
Never a red! He didn't try to take the player out... Just shows you that Americans know nothing about football
I am South American, lived in Argentina and Brazil. And I say that's a red card all the way. See? my argument is just as valid as yours because you placed nationality in the same level as knowledge.
They might be american. I’ve faced a lot of teams that have no English speaking players
Doesn't matter what the intent was... he got no ball contact and slid right into the player which is a foul. Now I agree that's not a red but it is a yellow
ja que vc morou aq no Brasil me explica como q isso foi cartao
Andrew Leite their American. Who says Americans can only speak English?
4:09 - 4:11 is when the foul occurred. There could have been several other fouls and even cards given but the ref let them play. Good acting job by the injured player.
That kid pulled a Neymar
❤❤❤
Being a player, I've done a tackle like this while in high school. "Luckily" for me I injured myself in a tackle that really coulda broken a guys' leg (I'm a dirty player). Had I not limped off with a sprained ankle, I 100000% should have been red carded, as this guy should have as well.
That was not a worth of a red card regardless of your experience.
@@muhammadshakir9 Notice not much of an argument from the player sent off. He apologizes to his opponent and then begs the ref not to card him, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE WENT IN RECKLESSLY AND VIOLENTLY . A RISK HE DIDN'T NEED TO TAKE !
He went for the ball
If we're calling the red for the dangerous play, then let's at least give a yellow to the player on the ground for simulation. Not sure he was even nicked, and he's acting like his leg is broken.
have u ever been ran into with a leg pointed straight to your own? yeah, shut up
Screw the card I’m just saying my G Diego need to pass
Last words of the video “you can get up now, he’s been sent off”
at 4:07 there the card they dived
That's not a red card offense, it's too much, a yellow would be perfect !!
Pronay Maitra he had his studs up.
I think that was his 2nd yellow
I swear ... if I hear "studs up" one more time ... This wasn't a studs-up challenge (and for SURE his cleats never made contact with the mortally wounded player). The RC was an overreaction to a late slide. "Studs Up, Referee!!" is the new "HANDS!". RIP "hands".
shut up... that hurts a shit on, you never even played football so u cant understand
I see nothing wrong with the challenge. Just a bunch of Americans who can’t take that football is actually a physical sport
TheRealHarrison 17 he has his studs up, if it makes contact and he other player goes down, it’s a red card.
Never a red card unless your playing professional league and based on the standard of this game it’s not
It's a red card cause the kid had his studs up I'm a ref. The ref made a good call
Is this kickball?
What country?
Play acting he caught but playing in slow mo you can see he catches his foot which were grounded. Why is he then holding his shin? Yellow card definitely but wasn't intentional at all
Yellow
If god wanted you to play in the air he would put grass up there
I’m guessing flight one of two….
The player is fine!
to be honest that should have only been a yellow not a red
I see them Santos Laguna shirts
Are they the actual Santos academy or are they some type of impersonation youth club
So i watched this whole video for the last 5 seconds...
I’ve played here before.
He went for the ball so I don't think it's any kind of fouls at most a yellow card
Referee has to set standards early on. If he only gives yellow, then other players will tackle reckelessly and maybe even break legs and have serious injuries. Dont be a chicken head
Dude Perfect JR does not matter his intentions. I agree he intended to play the ball but he did not. Instead he played the man late and connected with his studs. Clear red card foul
His studs were off the ground facing the opponent ankle ... if he would have lower his studs sliding in then he might get a yellow
i agree with you. i hate it when i "go for the ball" and break someones leg, and the ref gives me a red card.... HATE IT!!!
0:11 Handball
Harsh very Harsh
Great call.
Who did you call? I want to call to... Oh damn, forgot my phone
Maybe a booking at most
Studs up, late and excessive force is a red card