Ferrari's worst Formula 1 cars
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 чер 2024
- Given Ferrari's long history in Formula 1, it would be impossible for all of its cars to be great. Inspired by its struggles in 2020, we've gone back through the team's illustrious F1 history to dig out the worst cars it produced, and explain what made them so bad.
Subscribe: the-race.com/youtube_subscribe
Website: the-race.com/
Twitter: / wearetherace
Instagram: / wearetherace
Facebook: / wearetherace
Podcasts: the-race.com/podcasts
Thanks for watching - please like, share and comment, please also hit subscribe to show your support so we'll keep doing what we're doing.
#Formula1 #Ferrari
www.the-race.com
/ wearetherace - Спорт
It's funny how Ferrari once said aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines yet most of these cars were bad because of the engine
Enzo Ferrari: "Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines!"
SF1000 who has neither: 👁👄👁
This comment needs to head to the top!
Well... the years Ferrari had great engines obviously don't feature on this list, so that's somewhat of a selection bias
@@aslamnurfikri7640 Neither did the F14T.
@@rumblefish9 I mean, at least it didn’t use the d*ck nose.
Enzo Ferrari: "Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines."
Well, well, well. Look how the turntables.
Vettel take that too serious at Monza's First Chicane
How can you build a decent engine if they nerf the engine you just built just before the season!?
kid bot
Turntables.?? Lol what?
Do you mean "look how the tables have turned?"
@Brylle Cruz whats a boomer?reference to what?
Do a list on the most overhyped cars like the 2019 Ferrari after pre season last year
That list is endless: the stories before the season are always the same
2009 BMW Sauber
Yes, do it in top 10 fashion or some like that plz
sf90 is ok. Won in monza that's what really matters to tifosis.
kly plays not really good enough for Ferrari though, the expectation is push for the title every year
Jean Alesi drove 3 out of 9 cars mentioned on the list. Very unlucky guy.
Alesi had signed contract with Williams for 91 season but chose to go for Ferrari instead. With Williams Alesi would have in all likelihood become multiple time world champion but in the end all he got with Ferrari was a single race win. Such waste.
@@DarthJF
His love for the Italians spoke higher. Poor Alesi...
@@DarthJF Well, let's not forget the toxic ambient at Williams during the early '90s, so...
he went for Ferrari after signing because Frank didnt want to make the deal public because he wanted to bring Mansell out of retirement so in the end the choice was obvious it was Ferrari or nothing else
only ONE RACE WIN
Without any question the T5 of 1980 was the worst. Even a world champion couldn't qualify it at some races. That is dire to say the least.
312 of 1969 and 312 B3 from 1973 were worse
@@SchumiJr. 312 B3 from 1973 is disqualified for this list. Niki Lauda drove that car in 1974 as well and won races and several podiums with that car.
@@sekhyhybrid6701 why is disqualified? It didn't complete the season, so it's the worst by far
@@SchumiJr. Look further then 1973, mate. The 1973 Ferrari 312B3 also raced in 1974 (as the 312B3-74, which was the exact same car, but with revised set-ups as that was the problem in 1973.) and that's the exact reason why it's disqualified. Niki Lauda and Clay Regazzoni won races and claimed several podiums with it. In fact in 1974 Ferrari got 2nd in WCC with that car.
@@sekhyhybrid6701 well, then look at the 1969 Ferrari car, the 312. I know that it was used from 1966 to 1969, but the last version of the car was absolutely shit. 7 points all the season, and just one driver (Chris Amon for the first 6 races, and then Pedro Rodriguez)
Not gonna lie, it's quite an achievement that even their worst cars managed to get some podiums, when you see how some legendary teams/constructors have fallen (McLaren Honda, Renault, Williams since 2018, Lotus)
Not that impressive, considering they've always had the most money. When you're pouring in millions of dollars more than the front runners, a podium is pretty bad, particularly considering they also tend to have some of the best drivers of any given era
The likes of McLaren, Williams and Lotus have had to survive as independent racing teams, where you need to stay at the top to keep hold of your biggest sponsors, and retain your funding year-on-year.
Ferrari, on the other hand, has been bankrolled by FIAT since the late '60s, so can royally fuck up without losing their income.
The fact that they have a lot of money undermines a little bit, but it's still impressive nonetheless. McLaren and Williams, the examples given, are teams that already have millions of dollars more than frontrunners and still failed to even be in the points. The most important thing, to me, is that those three still continue on F1, no matter how difficult things get, and they're already staples of the sport. It's a shame that teams like Lotus, Brabham or brands like BMW or Jaguar left the sport.
@@RichardsRockin Lotus only left F1 because the company collapsed, and Brabham also collapsed. Jaguar and BMW absolutely could've stayed, though, but Jaguar was at the point where it was getting bought and sold by various car companies, so an unpredictable business like an F1 team was a bad idea at the time
BlaziTheEdgelord Honestly, I feel like those surprise podiums have less to do with Ferrari and more about the prestigious drivers that happen to sign into the team. Alonso, Alesi, and LeClerc come up as examples on the top of my head.
Wow that 1986 car was a chunk
@Ram Attack And the Lotus 98T
H E F T Y C H O N K
Wasn't their 73 car much more chonk.
@@F1ll1nTh3Blanks In fact, wasn't it that Niki Lauda the drove the 1973 Ferrari 312B3 also in 1974, that car would easily make this list.
The McLaren that year than was chunkier
Ferrari 2020: "Intellectual property is a very important asset of a company."
Ferrari 1955: "Let's obtain this D50 from Lancia and run it for multiple seasons."
Yes, F1 changed a lot since then... till the 80s there were still many teams buying cars from other teams and running them
@@raffaeledivora9517 Yes, I am aware of that. It's what strikes me as laughable, when today's constructors insist that teams being constructors and building their own cars is part of the 'DNA of Formula 1', as they're so fond of saying, when nearly half of the Championship's history has involved customer cars being a perfectly legitimate way to enter F1.
Ferrari obtained the entire racing division of Lancia after it completely retired from GP racing. Then they kept developing the car so... It's more of a Honda - > Brawn GP situation than a Copy Point story. Nobody questioned if Brawn GP owned the IP or not. Customer cars are banned since 1981, Bernie has made the sport a profitable business.
Why wouldn't IPs be a part of F1's DNA? You know DNA is the stuff that can change over time, I think it's called evolution.
@@MartAnthony If I remember well, Montezemolo proposed to FIA to lift the ban on customer cars to save money in 13/14, not long before he was sacked... but in that time Ferrari was the only team in favour of the idea. I think some more teams would support the idea now, expecially the struggling ones
@@davidlakatos9904 This is all true, however you never hear teams speaking about the DNA of Formula 1 other than when soap-boxing against a threat to their position of success, i.e. to campaign against change. I wouldn't call that evolution.
Michael Schumacher's 2005 car, All of Alonso's Ferrari cars especially the F14T aka "the FIAT". Both Kimi and Alonso struggled with it immensely. I honestly think the 2014 car was worst than the SF1000. Also, Domenicali wasn't ousted, he resigned and was replaced by Marco Mattiacci who was sacked.
Firstname Lastname
Did you *even watch* the video??
@Joel Schembri Dominated by Hamilton by a total of ZERO points in a team that was absolutely HOSTILE and boycotted him to the point of denying him his rightful pole chances (hence Hungary), asking the FIA to punish their own driver and bring him to the back of the pack (Hungary again) and do every single possible thing to bring him down.
It's documented. Ron Dennis admitted to it. Alonso's half of McLaren's box was on his side. Hungary's shenanigans could only happen with the help of his mechanics and his race engineer, and he took all the blame afterwards without outing any of them. Thirteen years later, Alonso is overwhelmingly regarded by the entire F1 paddock as a professional driver they'd love to have in their team DESPITE ALL THE BULLSHIT SPEWED BY THE BRITISH MEDIA while Hamilton's known to be a difficult diva when he's not winning, wholly turning all the "Toxic Alonso" argument upside down.
A good portion of the F1 fanbase, like you, will never comprehend how is it possible that Alonso's regarded as arguably the best post-Schumacher driver above a 4xWDC and a 6xWDC. To simpletons, more WDCs = better and you ain't getting outta that simplification anytime soon. You're just mad at the world for basing their opinion on facts that require watching 20 years of F1 race after race and actually understanding driver's performances, which you lack.
@Joel Schembri Unlike Alonso, Hamilton didn't get used exclusively to the Michelin tyres. Alonso struggled to adapt to these tyres, like Webber with the Pirelli tyres from 2011 onwards.
@Joel Schembri So you are admitting that the reason Alonso didnt get a 3rd title was because of the car? Ferrari didnt deliver and certainly Honda didnt as well. So why did Alonso beat Hamilton 4 years in a roll AFTER hamiltons rookie season? i thought drivers can only improve? Or maybe the 2007 season for Hamilton was a fluke? The Mclarens in Alonsos Ferrari years were clearly better so why didnt hamilton beat him in the standings? 2010 2011 2013 was embarrassing for Hamilton, can I say that he got dominated by Fernando Alonso?
Joel Schembri Umm Brawn was in 2009 when Alonso was in the Renault which was one of the slowest car on the grid? I think you need to shut your mouth if you don’t even know what year and which team you are talking about 😂
2005 - back when the FIA worked to limit one team dominating the sport
as if the party mode engine ban isn’t designed to do the exact same thing to mercedes
KinaferMusic yeah but it won’t work
And now this year, all they’re doing is helping one team continue dominating
The FIA is literally banning things mid season to stop Mercedes dominating F1, they never did this to Ferrari.
@@kinafermusic2456 Some examples of continued favoring by the FIA: illegal tire tests in 2013 and 2015, Pirelli's choice of tires from the 2019 season fell on the tires that best fit Mercedes during the 2018 season, freezing engine development at a time when the rest of the manufacturers had reliability issues, DAS being considered illegal and being used for a season, Mercedes allowed to run latest F1 engine at higher oil burn level and Ferrari not (2017), with this one having direct decision in the course of the championship
I don't know how anyone can say the F14-T was "decent aerodynamically". Watch any onboard of Alonso or Raikkonen driving it. They suffered understeer on nearly every corner entry, followed by snap oversteer on exit.
The car was horrific both aerodynamically and in the engine department. I'm not the biggest Alonso fan but is a genuine miracle he got 2 podiums in that thing
And ugly as hell. I saw today live in the Alonso museum and it was the second worst car in the show. Only after that 2009 Renault
If I remember correctly, Ferrari didn't even have a proper wind tunnel and were using Toyota Cologne's windtunnel and they couldn't get reliable aerodynamic data from their new one.
Where did he get the second podium?
TheRoboteer don’t get me started with Abu Dhabi that year
@@hallo_welt_ag One in China and One in Hungary
F2005 should not be on this list because the rules created by the FIA for 2005 have been implemented to eliminate F2004's strengths. According to Ross Brawn, when the rules were made public, the F2005 had already been developed. In the past, the FIA has acted to prevent prolonged domination by a team, since 2014 it has acted to guarantee the dominance of a single manufacturer
How exactly have they acted to guarantee dominance? Since 2014 we’ve had massive engine convergence, a brand new set of aero regulations and now Mercedes will be getting significantly less income in the future with a maximum spend incoming too.
The idea that the FIA have been working to preserve dominance is farcical.
True
I will never understand the absolute retardness that was the 05 tyre regulation. Not only was it a rushed move to screw over ferrari and bridgestone but also fucking dangerous.
@@fenhen I disagree with OP that Mercs dominance was guaranteed but I think it wasn't stopped like Ferrari after 2004, with all those stupid regs.
@@fenhen they acted later and also far less radically than the changes from 2004 to 2005
Fernando Alonso likes this.
@d64k i'm GIVE UP
Fernando likes gp2 engine as much
@@apaansih2863 that was in korean gp 2011
@@anasabubakr2981 yes
Good to know I have a model of one of these on my shelf at home
2009 car wasn’t great either
It did win a race though
Didn't even deserve a podium. Dog of a Car. Kimi dragged it into podiums and a race win.
@@binoy.bimbisaran Still more deserved then Schumachers victory in USA 2005. Belgium 2009 at least has a full grid.
@@sekhyhybrid6701 Deserving Victory,yes. But F2005 was a car that took Pole position ahead of McLaren and Renault.
Yeah it wasn't great. Once again, Ferrari not being prepared for a massive rule change. Should be an honorable mention.
Awesome video again. I have a suggestion for a new video. How about a list of cars that improved the most DURING a season. Cars that started the year slowley, but became competitive at the end. Cars that come to mind for me are: Williams FW36, McLaren MP4-24, Ferrari F60, Force India VJM8, Red Bull RB8,... You could also make a list the other way around. Cars that started the year competitive, but dropped in performance by the end of the year
nice idea
I can think of one car whose performance dropped towards the end of the year. The 1979 Ligier
@@yellow_x522 and the McLaren MP4-27
And not forgetting the Jordan 198
'Cars that started the year competitive, but dropped in performance by the end of the year' - I can only think of the 2009 Brawn car; that may be a hard one.
The Worst Ferrari in F1?
Their car naming convention.
What naming convention? It feels like they change it every year lmao
Probs 2020 cars that related to ferrari powered engine
They couldve just used the f system
F1950
F2005
F2019
@@Jake-ln6zk explain f2004 and f2005
@@cresbalundo8845 F150
The Ferrari La Ferrari
F150 sounds better
"If it looks right, it probably is right."
One glance at the F14T and you knew it was in for a hellish season.
I still remember the FIAT jokes about the 2014 Ferrari.
Now SF1000 is known as a tractor
Jean Alesi wasted his prime years with Ferrari. Such a shame
The same thing is beginning to happen with Charles Leclerc nowadays, shame that Ferrari can't give him something to fight with
In that list, Alesi drove 3 of these cars. Still have the interview when he said that the F92A had an exra OIL TANK to lubricate the V12.....
Video suggestion: What would the f2005 have been like if Ferrari ran Michelin?
Ferrari had the weakest power unit in 2014
2015 Honda: hold my sake
6:31 sneaky 'mama mia'
Danny Rogers lol good catch 😂
Ferrari's worst year was 1973. The 312B2 was no match for the cosworth powered garagistas, their world championship endurance team was closing and lead driver Jackie Ickx left the team prior to the German Grand Prix (although briefly returned for one race at Monza). In order to improve on Ferrari's performance Luca di Montezemolo was brought in as team manager in 1974. This allowed Mauro Forghieri to concentrate on the design of the successful 312T.
Also check out the strange experiments of the Spazzaneve and six wheeled 312T6
I feel like the f2012 should have been on the list, despite Alonso nearly dragging it to a championship, it was pretty bad aerodynamically. I actually like the design of it though
Prost, Michael (96, 97, 98), Alonso...
Now, Leclerc join the list of pushing shitboxes to podiums and championship contention.
You forgot s🅱inastian Vettel
The Ferrari of 1997 and 1998 were great cars
@@SchumiJr. The 97 310b was basically a worse version of the 96 Williams.
Michael wrestled that thing to the lead in the standings. But it was better than the 310 from 96 tho. That car was a real shit box.
@@joshimura1995 Ferrari 310 was not a winning car, but at least better than the f92a
The picture you show at 11:16 when talking about the 312T5's 180° V12 engine is actually of the 126CK's 120° hot-V twin turbo V6.
I would like to see a simiar video for McLaren
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
You can’t blame 2018. They had to shoe Horne the Renault Engine into a car designed for a Honda
White Hound well considering they claimed to have the best chassis in 2017 and were let down by the engine I’d say the 18 car was a failure and they got exposed with how bad their chassis was
Hybrid era, 2009, early 2000s there was also a bad mclaren, and form Senna to Häkkinen most of them. Also 1987car was not as good, as before, and after
@@fgp3843 you mean the sausage nose
What about the F2012? It was pretty disappointing as well
Yeah. It started the season 1.5 seconds off the pace and was 4th fastest behind the Lotus. I mean the Sauber was faster in Malaysia.
Yeah but alonso almost won the championship in that. But thanks to Ferrari’s brilliant strategy he lost the championship to Vettel in Brazil
@@diptipanat793 that was 2010 man he lost the championship in Brazil in 2012
Is not the worst is not great still I am not sure if F2012 better than F2011
Firstname Lastname Talking about qualifying pace, Ferrari was behind Red Bull McLaren Lotus Mercedes force India and Maldonado’s Williams but race pace was good
After Lauda left, till Michael arrived most of the ferraris were bad. Not all, there are some good cars, they won 2 constructors championships, and Prost was close to win the Title, but for every god car there is 2 or 3 awful
Let's see Lauda left in 1977,
Good cars: 1978, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1987/88, 1989, 1990, 1994, 1995
Bad cars: 1980, 1986, 1991, 1992, 1993
Some are difficult to categories like the 1981 and 1987/88, because they have many retirements, but they won races on their on merit and had some 1/2 finishes. Would put them in a decent or high potential category.
@@CamperPro2012 they sometimes won a race, but from 80-96 they were 2-or maybe 3 times close to win a championship. Sorry, i' dont mean awful cars, the most was not terrible, just not god, and for a team like ferrari, who in F1 since 70years. And most of these 70 years they were championship contenders.
If Mercedes win only 1or 2 race in 2021 then it would be a bad car/season for them. The same was for ferrari in these 15years
@@CamperPro2012 they won one or two a year during most of the 80s, but they were left way behind by McLaren and Williams
They won constructors in 82
I like the balance you provide in your videos. For example, highlighting very early that your sample set of less than optimal vehicles were from the last 70 years...
Ferrari in P14 and P15 after FP2
*_SAD S🅱️AGHETTI NOISES_*
I recall the F92A. It was horrid despite the technology invested in the dual floor. It also seemed to end the careers of both Cappelli and Larini.
I think the 1980 Ferrari 312T5 was the worst by some margin. From constructors champions to 10th place in just one year must be a record :D Reigning champion Jody Scheckter only managed to score 2 points during 1980 season! Classic Ferrari issue, thinking past success will carry to future success.
Another cracking video guys, It just goes to show you guys made the Autosport channel what it is, as you now have more subs than them!
when you talked about the ferrari 312/69 i remembered the 1970 ferrari 312b2. that car has the greatest engine sound ive ever heard from an f1 car, it was in an old shell advert at about the 1 min mark
2:31 : hasn't that been the case always. Bar the Schumacher- Brawn- Todt era..
Agree. The F92A was the worst Ferrari since (at least) the beginning of the 80's.
That car ended Capelli's career.
Absolutely. And let's remember that its predecessor got Prost out of the team. The years 91 to 93 were shockingly bad
Horrid car for sure.
The 1973 312B3 „Spazzaneve“ is missing. Of course, it was the first version of the famous 1974-1976 cars. But the 1973-version was a failure.
Thanks guys i have been looking for something light this
Ferrari is consistently unprepared.
Apart from all the other years where they either won the title or at least won several races and fought for the title....What about Williams and Mclaren then?
@@giuseppemaggio5894 I mean, at least they aren't spending more money than anyone else on the grid when they fall off the pace
Given their obscene budget, the team's long-running incompetence is doubly pathetic.
As an Italian myself. We are great craftsmen and artists but never let an Italian get into a power of large scale management as we are too hot headed. Most of shittiest politicians of the world are of Italian descent and the Italian politics are a joke
in my opinion, the 92 car is one of the most beautiful F1 cars ever
I love the way Edd Straw pronounces the word 'début' at 7:36.
8:54 Someone is laughing in the background when Edd says 'Ferrari F14T'. :D
Music
@@wastefellow2569 I know 'twas a joke. A yoke.
@@Undivided_X, both your jokes were as funny as a chair
@@wastefellow2569 damn
9:05. Ferrari it’s James
Truth is when you've made Formula 1 cars for 70 years some of them are gonna be bad, while some will be huge successes
Yeah, the same happened to other long standing teams such as Lotus, McLaren and Williams
Ferrari have always had the money to be at the front, though. With what they spend, they should always be in contention for wins, and they certainly shouldn’t be building midfield cars.
Other former top teams who’ve fallen back have done so mainly because of a lack of funds (McLaren being an exception, they still spend a similar amount to Red Bull).
They seem to always be playing catch-up on new tech / rule changes; it is very worrying for the next 3-5 years, given the engine development restrictions and the totally new car design for 2022. 2019 with that "hot" engine will be seen as their last glory year for some time.
As you must have noticed by now , The no changes in regulations until 2026 is meaningless. It didnt take them half a season tobthrow that out and make test procedure changes and make teams redesign the floors of there cars even after passing all the preseason testing
The F60 of 2009 would be on my list. Falling from Constructors Champions in 2008 with 172 points to 4th in 2009 with 70 points. Whilst it was initially not as far off the ultimate pace as fellow 2008 championship contenders McLaren, the car showed the lack of effort by the team pushing for the title in 2008 as long as they did (they missed the trick with the double diffuser for example). On top of this, from the driver's perspective, due to the packaging of the Motor/Generator Unit and energy store for the KERS system, which were fitted beneath the fuel tank in an attempt to keep the heavy mass as low as possible, the drawback was the increased centre of gravity when race fuel was added. Although Massa and Raikkonen were able to get the car relatively close to the front (indeed Raikkonen won the Belgian Grand Prix) the drivability problems would rear its head when Massa was severely injured in Hungary. Neither of the drivers hired to stand in for him, Luca Badoer and Giancarlo Fisichella, could cope with the handling characteristics (Badoer qualified and finished last in both of the races he participated in) and with McLaren finding better performance after the German Grand Prix, with Hamilton out scoring everyone from Hungary onwards (in which he scored 2 wins and 4 pole positions between Hungary and Abu Dhabi) Ferrari ceased development on the F60 to try to improve for 2010
Do a Williams worst - on second thoughts you probably don't have that much free time.
They wouldn't do worst cars for Williams because they're British. 23 years with no titles, too, and they've fallen off hard since 2014.
There is just 1 thing that I find hilarious about "F1 fans". During years where Ferrari is underperforming they all like to make fun of Ferrari and say silly stuff but it literally takes 2 points to shut them up :
1) Ferrari has been in F1 the longest of any team. It's MATHEMATIC that they were going to have several underperfoming cars by staying in the sport for 70 years. Teams like Mercedes will always make you notice how they rarely make terrible cars..but that's because they will just leave the sport once they'll stop winning! We've seen MAAANY teams do this throughout these 70 years (Mercedes included) and you can be damn sure it will happen again soon.
2) If you have so many bad things to say about a team that has won 16 constructors, 15 driver titles and has fought for the title and won several races in so many years (including the last 3 so it's not like we're talking about just the 70s and 80s here), I can't even imagine what you have to say about Mclaren and Williams spending most of the last decade at the very back, not winning a race for 8 seasons in a row and not winning a constructor for more than 2 decades now!
The painful truth is that F1 has just got worse and worse in the past 15 years. What used to be a constant experimentation and innovation (possible throughout the huge freedom that was given to the engineers) has now become a pathetic, stale competition where teams are extremely limited in car development and can't really do much to change they way things go.
In the past 10 seasons, only 2 different teams won the constructor and the driver championship...TWO TEAMS IN TEN YEARS. Do I really need to say anything else?
Both McLaren and Ferrari won their last titles in 2008, had a downfall in 09 and were in championship contention in the following years. Williams won fuck all after 1997 despite some race wins. Teams have high and lows, it's the sport and if you have been racing for a long time, like these teams, you know some seasons are shit. Despite that people just like bashing on Ferrari. And press doesn't help matters
Whilst I don't dislike Ferrari, and I agree that a huge amount of F1 fans havent a clue, the tone of what you've said above is exactly why people do take the piss out of Ferrari. It's the air of entitlement that the company gives across that people enjoy tearing down. This has existed since the 60s and 70s.
Considering that only 32 individual drivers have won a world championship, and that includes all the once off champions like Button and Raikkonen, it's pretty obvious that these dominant periods are just normal. Ferrari has been in the sport longer than anyone, and yet they keep fucking up. They keep making the same mistakes, again and again, and refuse to change because the company is still being run like Enzo Ferrari is alive. Like there's an egotistical child pulling the strings who can't take criticism and will blame everyone but himself when things go wrong
Given the amount of money that’s been dumped into the team, they shouldn’t have cars that aren’t in contention to win races, let alone the midfield runners mentioned on this list.
They’re a team ruined by internal politics, which hold back its engineers.
Here's one for you: You are only as good as your last race.
All that historical pride is meaningless on the racetrack. That's just for marketing.
Yes, under performing teams all get criticized and rightfully so, it's not like people just single out Ferrari which you seem to be overly defensive about.
I like the music with this video 👏🏼 and the video of course 😂
Can we have this type of video with all the teams please?😊
Kimi saved the 2009 car being on this list
@3213232 1231223 I like the look of it. The red looks so nice and it looks sleek
This hurts
F
Ironic you say that considering your name
@@the9der352 haha
Good to know I have a model of one of these on my shelf at home
I'm surprised the F2012 isn't here, either that or I'm a relatively new F1 fan and don't know how much worse the cars on the list are compared to the F2012
2019, 2020 cars are not bad cars. They are not as good as the other 3.
2019 was okay, 2020 is awful. The chassis balance is off, the engine is more underpowered than the F14T, and it's way too draggy. It's a whole second slower than the 2019 car around Austria. Teams are supposed to develop the car to be a second faster in the next season, not a second slower.
There literally 6th in the constructors
@@pls-no-punterino7095 how do u know it has less power than 2014 Ferrari any proof for that or you are just making shit up?
@@vukd9877 I mean relative to the other cars. the 2014 Ferrari engine is most likely less powerful than the 2020 engine, but the speed difference compared to the Mercedes is worse with the 2020 car. No common folk can really prove if one f1 engine is more powerful than the other because we don't have access to that info.
@@pls-no-punterino7095 then why claim something you aren't sure about
9:21 I can feel Alonso's pain
The F2005 was mainly bridgestone's problem , every car using bridgestone was in the midfield to last , the tyres worked on Ferrari at Imola race only
I think the F2005 was actually a better *car* - let down more by the tyres - than the F2012 which, although it nearly won the championship, was benefited by tyre behaviour that no one had yet mastered and the inconsistency/unreliability of others. Michael’s pole in Hungary in 2005 was a better show of outright pace than anything the F2012 could muster (albeit with Alonso somehow dragging out 3 wins in race/mixed weather conditions)
0:00 What Mesut Ozil is doing here?
That's Enzo Ferrari. Ozil looks like him
@@petarpavlovic3904 it's a yoke
@@petarpavlovic3904 this is YOKE
Sf1000: am I a joke to you?
...what a Yoke!
Gp2 engine, fiat panda aerodynamics 😂😂
@@tamastoth7768 the F14T was much worst.
@@hardcoreschnitzel it’s joke
@@louisbeerreviews8964 Alonso would like to have a word with you :>
Kind of weird sequencing to do the 642/643 first, then the 86, then the 1993 car. Especially considering it wasn’t a ranked list...
When you think of Ferrari you also think of money. With their budget and F1 bonuses, the last championship in 2007 sounds like a joke. It would be interesting to compare the budgets of the teams and their results in different years to see who achieves the most.
Ferrari is presents since the very second GP (1950) , the royalties Ferrari earns are much less then what the FIA earns because Ferrari is still incompetition
3:29 "In the background Ferrari was being torn apart by politics." It's nice such a thing hasn't happened again, oh wait.....
It's happening since 2019 again ahhhh
Next McLaren and Williams :)
I think they did Williams before, but that might've been WTF1
Guys, are you not going to draw attention to the current RP situation regarding Ferrari's position and last year's engine issues?
I know you covered it is individually, but this is a big story in itself.
I'm really surprised you haven't done so already.
Thanks, Col
Just seen the site. Article posted 4 hours ago. Thanks guys 👍
5:49 is that a dot matrix scoreboard in the background? That's advanced for 1958
I like no one is talking about the SF-16H 😂🤣
It was a good car but Ferrari stop the development of the car because of 2017 rules , at the start of the season was comfortable the 2nd best car
"SF1000 has entered the chat"
The F2005 would have been a better car had Bridgestone not completely screwed up on their tires. I think Renault would have won ultimately because of the inertial damper but it would have been Renault one and Ferrari 2. Outside of that this list could have been just Ferrari's first half of the 90's and the 2009 and 2014 Ferrari.
In other words:
Ferrari always suffer with huge changes on regulations.
- F14T (2014)
- F2005 (2005)
- F60 (2009)
- F2012 (2012)
- F93A (1993)
9:56 Ferrari sponsored by Haas
Haas is mainly a tool company if I'm not mistaken
@@jussieronen3707 yes
3:31 “Ferrari was being torn apart by politics”, things havent changed much
Great Timing
I think Ferrari's F310 was not great. I remember Eddie Irvine saying in an interview years after driving it that he was surprised Schumacher was able to push it for wins, as the car felt like a dog to drive!
Yeah but Eddie Irvine was shite.
Shows just how good Schumacher was in his prime.
Ferrari = the banter club of F1 imagine having so much history and resources and haven't won a championship for 13 years and they get more prize money than the current champions mercedes only because of thier history glad to see Ferrari struggling overrated team
"The Type 015 Flat-12 Boxer Engine"
Not a boxer, then show off their Turbo engine
The fact that calling out the word "V10" in Ferraris garage in the 90s was like calling out Vodemorts name did hurt them alot.
In the end the rules forced them away form their beloved bad V12 and they were suddenly competitive again in 1997 :D
The 312T5 was by far the worst because it was so uncompetitive and slow 1979 world champion Jody Scheckter failed to qualify it in some races and Gilles Villeneuve barely put it at the far end of the grid.
However the 1973 Ferrari 312B3 deserves to be on this list. So bad it didn't even finish on the podium in a single race of 1973. And when Niki Lauda got to test this car in late 1973 he openly called said:"It's sh*t!" to Enzo Ferrari himself.
And those who believe the 1974 car is the same have no clue. Three different version of the 312B3 were made by Ferrari and all three were distinct enough to get their own type names.
These guys are such a joke, they always bash Ferrari in their videos
Hardly fair to add f2005 when the rules were SPECIFICALLY changed to stop Ferrari........
The F310 surely had to make this list
It came 2nd in the championship in both years it was entered and won 8 races. Schumacher fought for the championship with Villeneuve in the b-spec car.
I would have added the 1973 312B3. An absolute stinker that caused them to pull out of several races.
Absolutely agree.
Alternate title : Ferrari's collection of SF1000's
Less Prancing Horse, more a Limping Donkey.
The Tifosi will disagree.
@@preppyringmaster soooo... I disagree with myself then.
A video idea - biggest F1 team declines between two seasons. Examples - Lotus 2013-2014, McLaren 2012-2013, Ferrari 2004-2005, Honda 2006-2007, McLaren 1993-1994, Lotus 1978-1979, you get the point. A team doing well in one season and FAR worse the next season.
very nice video
Haters gonna hate, no matter what Ferrari do. Have fun, cheers.
What's hate got to do with anything lmao
"Insightful"
Ferrari--persistent under-performers compared to their self-importance. Take away Michael and they are mediocre at best.
And Lauda
yep they are crap
For all those that aren’t into British locomotives, the “Pannier Style” fuel tanks derive their name from the Great Western Railway’s pannier tank engines.
Um...I don't think so. Panniers are bags or cases placed either side of a motorbike, or bicycle, & before that, donkeys. So your train only followed those, which pre-date railways.
Falling behind by basing a car off of a previously successful design.....sounds like the SF1000. With the season over, it might deserve a place here.
"Ferraris are for people who can't build engines".
Can't see a meaning behind this comment
are you high?
Ferrari SF1000: 👁👄👁
@@giuseppemaggio5894 don't look for one, haters be hating.
05’ car was F1 way to cock block ferrari from another championship. Funny ya don’t see the British bias doing the same for their golden boy cry baby a Hamilton 🧐
I actually would like to see what the other worst cars are for F1 from the other teams in lists, but for Red Bull it could be a combination of their own teams cars and teams that they have sponsored in the past
How about looking at Ferrari's worst 10 cars that have won at least 1 race in another video? Bet that would be quite interesting (C126K (1981), F310, F60, F2012 are a few examples)
First
And?
@@brandy0438 and? Don't you understand the meaning of what he had done? Are you mad?
Will Branson Something Ferrari can’t manage
"you can help expanding this list" *interrested ferrari noises*
Binnoto: whys our car so slow
Engineers: slow button on slow button on
What a shame the 643 was a failure- really one of if not the most beautiful car on the grid besides the Jordan that year.
The 643 is gorgeous