The New FAA Drone Rules You Missed for 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2024
  • Drone Rules for Recreational Pilots can be CRAZY Confusing! Get your FREE CHEAT SHEET here to SIMPLIFY them, including links to important information!
    👏 The Clapper: amzn.to/3Ueagr7
    📃 Alien Drones RULES CHEAT SHEET DOWNLOAD: tinyurl.com/yc4bk67h
    👉 Local Rules Research Vid: • How to fly a drone Any...
    🏅 Pilot Institute 107 course: bit.ly/3rwJrxV (or enter ALIENDRONES in the coupon section) you can get $100 off, they guarantee you pass or money back.
    @PilotInstitute
    @FPVFreedomCoalition
    ☕☕ Enjoy the content? Buy Me a Coffee! www.buymeacoffee.com/AlienDrones
    👕 The now INFAMOUS Alien Drones FAA SHIRT SERIES here: alien-drones.myspreadshop.com...
    == My Equipment ==
    DRONES:
    - FIMI X8 Pro: fimiuavstore.com/?ref=73m40rxb
    - Potensic ATOM 3-Axis (Potensic Site): shrsl.com/48iws
    - Potensic ATOM 3-Axis (Fly More Pkg - Amazon): amzn.to/3RPtYZd
    - DJI Mini 2 se: amzn.to/43eotpS
    - ATOM SE: amzn.to/3S26HRK
    - Skydio 2+: skydio.pxf.io/NKrvEb
    - DJI Mini 3 Pro: amzn.to/3WnWmRZ
    - EXO Blackhawk 2 - Mini Pro: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
    - Ruko F11 GIM2: amzn.to/36XBRX7
    - EXO X7 Ranger Plus: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
    - EXO Cinemaster2: bit.ly/3BgyYg7
    - DJI Mavic Air 2s: amzn.to/3wlGUbI
    -DJI Mavic Mini2: amzn.to/3gtK0ng
    MISC. STUFF
    - 💨TopTes Anemometer: amzn.to/3YQVxl5
    - DroneTag Mini: bit.ly/3z3wNvh
    - Lume Cube Strobe: amzn.to/2FmZHxt (EBAY): ebay.us/SVV6z3
    - 64G Extreme SD Card: (Amazon) amzn.to/2JNk3Bi
    CONTROLLER PARTS:
    - Magnetic Charging Cable: (Amazon) amzn.to/3IEYdKW
    - Remote Rt Angle Cable (Type C): amzn.to/2XNhJAj
    - Remote Rt Angle Combo Pack (Type C, tablet and phone): amzn.to/37LpFWa
    - Remote Rt Angle Cable (Lightning): amzn.to/2RTjYOy
    - Remote Rt Angle Cable (Micro): amzn.to/33ye9cx
    --TABLET Rt Angle cable (Type C): (Amazon) amzn.to/2oJ7Hkp
    --- TABLET Rt Angle cable (Micro): amzn.to/2XVGHLY
    -- Skyreat Tablet Holder (Metal NUT): (Amazon) amzn.to/3Y4PbO0
    CAMERAS AND BLOGGING EQUIPMENT:
    - Sony A6400: (Amazon) amzn.to/2EIt7mC
    - Camera Tripod (Amazon) amzn.to/2rCQdr8
    - Extension Tubes for Macro Photography (Amazon): amzn.to/2FRtRcN
    🎤 DJI Mic: amzn.to/3BQItDo
    🎤 Coiled TRS Mic Patch Cable (red): amzn.to/3IWKlOD
    🎤 Coiled Saramonic TRS Patch Cable: amzn.to/3G8VxGB
    🎤 Saramonic Lav (Black): amzn.to/3jgarBU
    🎤 Saramonic Lav (White): amzn.to/3FEs7yC
    Your support is appreciated as a small stipend may be received from associate links included here which cost you nothing, but helps support this channel and foster future content!
    POST PROCESSING SOFTWARE:
    Luminar Neo: skylum.evyy.net/a1rMeZ
    DISCOUNT CODE for $10 OFF Luminar: "aliendrones"
    Hey, Like the music? Audiio has a pay-once, lifetime plan, no subscription!: Audiio Link here: audiio.com/pricing?oid=1&affi... and Use “AlienDrones10” for 10% OFF! or "SAVE100" for $100 OFF a subscription!
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/cruen/we-got-this
    License code: TPNYQICNXEYZJZXK
    Any material included herein for illustration or example creates new value and complies with industry fair use best practices. Your support is appreciated as a small stipend may be received from associate links included here which cost you nothing, but helps support this channel and foster future content! Thank you again for visiting Alien Drones!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 262

  • @AlienDrones
    @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +2

    Find out what Paperwork you need with you when flying a drone here: ua-cam.com/video/qzg0AigUnZw/v-deo.html

  • @slapdat.byteme
    @slapdat.byteme 3 місяці тому +22

    Good video content. It’s helpful to understand all the FAA rules I’ll be breaking this year. 😎

    • @charlenemyers188
      @charlenemyers188 3 місяці тому

      Rogue operator identified intentional acts.

    • @slapdat.byteme
      @slapdat.byteme 3 місяці тому +2

      @@charlenemyers188 Lone technician transcribed deliberate calisthenics.

  • @ThatwillleaveaMark
    @ThatwillleaveaMark 4 місяці тому +20

    This is why i quit flying altogether (full size and rc) too many hoops to jump through. They have the system over regulated. This will bite them eventually.

    • @memefpv
      @memefpv 4 місяці тому +6

      i don’t blame you… BUT, if we all quit, the FAA wins

    • @mark33328
      @mark33328 4 місяці тому +1

      It won’t bite them because rec flyers are annoying to them. They want to charge big $$$ for commercial flyers and get rid of the rec flyers by creating more fees and restrictions.

    • @jackguinn8462
      @jackguinn8462 4 місяці тому

      The FAA don't give a rat's a$$.It is called "CONTROL".

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому

      @@memefpv better than stressing out over legalese no one understands or is subjective to every single reader not employed at the FAA

    • @user-kv6qc6jc4m
      @user-kv6qc6jc4m 2 місяці тому +2

      @@memefpv Imagine thinking you're gonna win against the federal government

  • @mikeb1596
    @mikeb1596 2 місяці тому +3

    As someone who flies FPV freestyle, the ridiculous rules requiring a spotter forces me to not comply. I work 50 to 60 hrs a week, in order to get some flying time in I usually have to do it unplanned when i have some free time, can't really just walk down the street and find some random person to be my spotter. It's completely unnecessary when I'm flying with 200ft and away from any people.

    • @MessingWithCode
      @MessingWithCode 2 місяці тому

      it is really sad , that we have that rule regardless how smart our drones are. now a days even if you build it to run on Betaflight or INAV they come fully features with GPS rescue or return to home

  • @CGAZ66
    @CGAZ66 Місяць тому

    Great information. I needed the reminder of some of this. I have not flown my drone in awhile.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for sharing! Time to get out and fly! 💸

  • @richardpesce5325
    @richardpesce5325 4 місяці тому +3

    Thanks for the clarification
    , really appreciate it!

  • @HighHouseDark_
    @HighHouseDark_ Місяць тому +1

    Im torn. Not sure if i should go with the mini 4 pro with the extended batteries that takes it over 249g. On one hand id prefer not to register and keep it under 249. Other hand id like the bigger batteries. And i might want to try and do more than rec. Not a fan of the remote id though.

  • @azdronedude
    @azdronedude 4 місяці тому +4

    Great informational video Thanks

  • @aklivn49
    @aklivn49 3 місяці тому

    GREAT information. I passed my Trust certificated for recreational flying. THANKS for the FREE cheat sheet. The ALFOT is confusing.

  • @Pepesplants
    @Pepesplants 4 місяці тому

    This is off topic but I wonder if you know the answer to this issue. How I can set the height on my Mini 4 Pro to 50 feet instead of the default minimum of 65 feet? Asked for LAANC permission and it said I could fly up to 50 feet then was unable to fly. The drone defaults to a minimum of 65 feet.

  • @SunriseWaterMedia
    @SunriseWaterMedia 4 місяці тому +1

    Good tips, Keith. 👍

  • @RonaldBrown59
    @RonaldBrown59 4 місяці тому

    Good information, thanks for sharing.

  • @Frank-uf2vn
    @Frank-uf2vn Місяць тому

    WHOOOO I thought there were new rules, this was just a refresher on what already is! Still needed for anyone who just purchased a drone!

  • @sfh422
    @sfh422 3 місяці тому

    Just purchased a DJI Mini 2 SE. I intend to get my part 107 but in the mean time I’m only flying over my own 10 acres while I learn how to fly it proficiently.

  • @HikeFly22
    @HikeFly22 4 місяці тому +1

    Good info

  • @1stAmendmentDrone
    @1stAmendmentDrone 4 місяці тому +3

    Rules for thee, not for me. Or is it rules for me, and not for thee? Either way.
    I’ll use nypd and every local news channel. There were drones flying over 10s of thousands of people in NYC for NYE. Same at football stadiums.
    If i fly my drone over a stadium, which i won’t. Suits are coming to visit me at my house.
    The nypd puts up drones and flys over crowds in an instant.
    I’m good knowing i fly my drone minding my business and as part a 107.
    Vlos. I see the entire horizon left to right. Thats literally line of sight.
    Cbo tells me to fly in an airfield and to join local clubs to use their fields.
    I fly with laanc if need. The drone won’t fly, it hits an invisible wall.
    I haven’t flown because dji refuses to fix my broken from day of purchase drone.

  • @jmr2008jan
    @jmr2008jan 3 місяці тому

    Can someone show me where it specifically says sub 250g drones do not require registration if operated under recreational rules. The rec rules, ie 49 USC 44809, state drones require registration to fall under said rules, it does not state "if needed." Yes, the FAA says on their webpage for flying recreationally

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      All drones flights are part 107 flights, unless they meet the "Exception" for recreational fliers, under 44809. The same language is used for registration, all drones require registration but there is an "exception" of 44809 and

  • @michaelduva5217
    @michaelduva5217 2 місяці тому +1

    great video ! can sub 250g drones without RID, such as the Mini 2 se, have to be only flown in FAA-Recognized Identification Areas (FRIAs), or can they be flown Anywhere ? (asking in particular about the Mini 2SE ! without RID ! )

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому +1

      Can be flown recreationally without RID only in allowed Class G airspace or other areas that are legal to fly in... A good RID Reference is this latest video: ua-cam.com/video/_GkvNlRYtqc/v-deo.html

    • @michaelduva5217
      @michaelduva5217 2 місяці тому +1

      @@AlienDrones at 6 min. it’s very focused on part 107

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому +1

      @@michaelduva5217 If you're trying to find a way to know where you can fly legally this is an outline of how to find out. _Where_ you can fly is the same if you're part 107 or recreational. The only difference is if you are not recreational (or part 107) then you always need registration and remote ID too. ua-cam.com/video/H3_oJ5ZKiwA/v-deo.html

    • @michaelduva5217
      @michaelduva5217 2 місяці тому +1

      ⁠@@AlienDronesoh wow. thank you for all the replies,!!! I am both recreational trust and part 107. I was trying to decide for buying a DJI mini 2 se. or not. it seems from what you have said, I would be fine flying it pretty much anywhere in class G (and do not have to stay in the recreational fields with the dji mini 2se as long as i’m flying for fun not work. sound correct ? or am i stuck in Friars only if i don’t add an external RID ?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@michaelduva5217 You are correct, but because you mentioned you have your part 107, please indulge me a moment to clarify. If you fly recreationally AND you do not have the mini 2 SE registered, then you can fly in any Class G with no remote ID and you are good as long as you follow 44809 (recreational) rules. If you fly this drone under part 107 and register the drone (because it is required to be registered under part 107 rules) then you will need to add a remote ID module to it, *THEN* you can fly anywhere in Class G as you mentioned. No need to fly in a FRIA. IF you decide to remove the RID module but leave the drone registered, then you will only be allowed to fly it in a FRIA because by the nature of being registered it requires RID and you don't have it in that instance. I know it is convoluted but hope this helps

  • @richardhykes6939
    @richardhykes6939 4 місяці тому

    I'm here in Virginia asking for permission to fly in some of the parks here in my area. The supervisor there said he's not sure. I have the app Before u fly. So far so good. Fimi x8 mini pro. Up an away. Keep on flying my friend

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Nice! Usually their default is to just say "no" even if it's not true. "Fly it like you stole it!" 🤙

  • @bomanone0905
    @bomanone0905 2 місяці тому

    Question: Can i put my recreational flight videos on UA-cam as long as there is no text or voice that could be considered instructional? Background music only? Just for friends and family to see recreational flight? Thanks in advance and great video!

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому

      Hello! Short answer, yes you can! 🤙

    • @bomanone0905
      @bomanone0905 2 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones TY very much again Keith. Blue skies!

  • @BobVlogs408
    @BobVlogs408 3 дні тому

    FAA dont play around, $20k fines, no joke!! Be sure you have all your documents, and stay under 400ft.

  • @dylanbeane7260
    @dylanbeane7260 2 місяці тому

    So my tiny whoop doesnt need any of this?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому

      Actually, it needs ALL of this, with the 1 exception of registration IF you are flying recreationally and doing it legally. If not flying recreationally or not following ALL the recreational rules then Part 107 is needed and you'll need to follow the part 107 rules.

  • @brandonthevisionary485
    @brandonthevisionary485 4 місяці тому +3

    Great job thanks for looking out for us

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for taking the time to share!

  • @InfluxFPV
    @InfluxFPV 4 місяці тому +1

    They do realize most of us do not care right? we will never have remote ID on our quads
    .

  • @robskully3539
    @robskully3539 3 місяці тому

    hi … been a subscriber for a long time but haven’t really used my old Mavic much the last few years. One of your other videos came up on my feed, the one with Pilot Institute, and it got me wanting to fly again. I did get an email in the Fall (2023) from the FAA about my drone flying registration needing renewal. So I started watching drone videos again and your video came up. I am going to try getting my 107 after watching your videos. I have always been afraid of not having a good enough memory at age 70 now to pass the test but like how Pilot Institute has a guarantee. So I am definitely going with them. I have a question about line of sight flying. I just watched a guy on youtube do a flying range test on a mini 4, I believe it was. He flew it a couple of miles but unfortunately he was 1000 feet short of making it back. How can you legally fly that far ? I can’t see my Mavic after it gets like a couple of hundred feet away with the naked eye ? After 400 feet or so the Mavic is so freaking small. Also this guy was not using a headset either and was only using the hand remote.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому +2

      Glad to hear you will continue flying and do it safely. Pilot Institute is really the professional place to go, they are really good and keep all their training up to date. Take your time, ask questions and you'll do fine. They do have the guarantee as you mention and that's not just for the course but the test fee as well, which I've never seen anyone else offer. That's speaks to their confidence to me. You are correct in questioning the visual line of site distance. Every one of these you see done in the US is illegal, plain and simple. They are taunting the FAA to take action eventually and the problem will be when there is an issue, like you mentioned one not making it home and it lands on a highway and causes damage/injury, or gets in the way of a helicopter, etc, then they will pile on similar to what they are doing with PhillyDroneLife (link to my community page from a couple of days ago) www.youtube.com/@AlienDrones/community . I did do a video on BVLOS rules where I discuss all of the common excuses for doing this ua-cam.com/video/jEADpjbtLZk/v-deo.html but bottom line, BVLOS is illegal without a waiver, which is very difficult to obtain... 🤙

    • @robskully3539
      @robskully3539 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones yes I watched your video ( and many more here today ) about him. I do have a question that I would not rather post here about some of the videos I have done in the past. Do you take questions via an email address from people ? Thanks … btw .. love your channel 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @robskully3539
      @robskully3539 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones Wow .. never checked that Community tab on any UA-cam channel before. Never knew it was stuff like that. Damm … I am learning so much today !

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому +1

      @@robskully3539 Sure, if you go to the main channel ua-cam.com/channels/j5Zkn8Qv_VPSVZJF1Sg3Qw.html and click the > next to the channel logo to see the description and there is an email option. Just mail there and I'll do my best to answer. I just don't put the email here because bots will pick it up and SPAM the address...

    • @robskully3539
      @robskully3539 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones thank you … ohh … didn’t see email link but saw link to FB page and sent request

  • @RebelByNature
    @RebelByNature 4 місяці тому

    As a recreational pilot, I understand I can not take off at 'ground level', near a building, and then be able to ascend up to 400 feet over the roof of the building. Need 107 for that. However, as a recreational pilot, can I take off from the roof of the building itself and have 400 feet of airspace above me? It would not seem much different from taking off from a hill or ridge line other than one is man made and one is not but that doesn't seem like a material difference.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +2

      That is a good observation! There actually has been a lot of discussion about this at the FAA, and AGL or "Above Ground Level" is just that, _ground_ level. A structure does not count when you're talking recreational. Same thing goes the opposite way when you're part 107, the "above structure" part is "man-made" structures, so you can't fly 400' above the closest tree for instance, but a building counts, like you referenced. Don't ask about making sense, it is government so that is not a requirement, just is what it is... 😎 Hope this helps!

    • @hawaiiangunner
      @hawaiiangunner 2 місяці тому +1

      Or you could buy an ultralight aircraft that you could actually get in and fly around with absolutely no training and no license. This is what I think of when I hear about drone laws

  • @bobbylefebvre6298
    @bobbylefebvre6298 4 місяці тому +2

    Great video nice information cool channel

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      🤙

    • @bobbylefebvre6298
      @bobbylefebvre6298 4 місяці тому

      I have that cheat sheet download thanks

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      @@bobbylefebvre6298 Thanks for letting me know it worked. First time trying a file for download...

  • @cryptotwins9258
    @cryptotwins9258 Місяць тому +1

    After all this why even get a drone smh they make it impossible all I want to do is fly it in the park 🤦‍♂️

  • @_Per_Aspera_Ad_Astra_
    @_Per_Aspera_Ad_Astra_ 2 місяці тому +1

    the same over here. Just fly out in nature and do not interfere with others, quiet and without wild behavior nor drugs-alcohol 😢 use your brain 🧠.
    Have fun 🤩
    and screw all the bloody
    rules / a nightmare.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому +1

      "Use your brain" is the hard part for many... 😅

    • @MessingWithCode
      @MessingWithCode 2 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones HAHAHAAHAHAH

  • @kcbroncohater
    @kcbroncohater 11 днів тому

    I was going to buy one until I found out I have to keep line of sight.

  • @ultimateviking1
    @ultimateviking1 3 місяці тому

    I fly recreationally, under 249grams. Is it legal to fly a drone recreationally over 249grams, as long as I register it with the FAA?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому +1

      Of course! Same rules as with a drone that is under 250g, but for over 250g you just need registration as you mentioned, and need to have remote ID broadcasting then as well. Other than that, all the same... 🤙

  • @drluketheduke1531
    @drluketheduke1531 4 місяці тому

    Morning! Thanks for the video! I’ve been watching for awhile now and good reminder. Question…so I live at a spot where I can’t take off any drones due to a few restrictions. Do you have a video on how to request waivers so that I can fly at least 15 m at my house? Could I call the air traffic control to get the waiver to upload on my DJI?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +2

      Hello! It depends on the nature of what "can't take off due to flight restrictions" means. If it is restricted airspace you can not fly there. It is restricted. If it is controlled airspace and you are looking for a way to get an "authorization" to fly there (not a waiver), you can apply for LAANC approval with an app like "Aloft" and if it is possible (and the airport has LAANC) they you should be able to get an approval there. If the airport does not have LAANC, then you need to go to FAA's DroneZone site and request approval, and this can take up to 30 days, sometimes longer www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_flyers/authorization . Calling the control tower to get airspace approval is not a valid path anymore, so don't call them unless you are trying top be nice and notify them, but probably they will get annoyed (if you do reach them) so I'd shy away from calling in most situations. In addition, if by "can't take off" you mean the drone itself won't launch (mostly only DJI drones), then not only will you need the above authorizations, you will also need to unlock the drone, and there is some info on that here: tinyurl.com/3whfhp4f .

    • @drluketheduke1531
      @drluketheduke1531 4 місяці тому +1

      @@AlienDrones awesome! thank you for the detailed reply! wow! so, looking at this again (which I had last year) - I am screwed! lol...I cannot fly, as I'm in a restricted area and I tried for shits and giggles to see if I could get a LAANC approval and nope! this sucks...I don't understand why I can't fly 15 meters - that is not even close to the top of the tree lines and there is no way for a plane to go lower than the tree lines. I'm so mad...I have 2 DJI drones and can't fly them now. ugh..stupid!

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому

      @@drluketheduke1531 welcome to the club. Are you near a dod facility or next to a major airport? If it’s the drone itself that won’t take off then go to a drone hacking forum and flash the drone with a custom firmware for your model if available and disable the lockouts. Fly at your own risk…

    • @highrider9168
      @highrider9168 4 місяці тому

      Try to use the LAANC system to get permission to fly.

  • @0x80O0oOverfl0w
    @0x80O0oOverfl0w 2 місяці тому

    When it comes to recreational flying, other than the need for registration and remote ID, I wasn't aware there were any differences between the rules for less than 250 gram UAVs and 55 lbs UAVs? Or am I missing something?

    • @hzwinip
      @hzwinip 2 місяці тому

      I'm not 100% about any of this, but part of the rules was to obtain the TRUST certificate. If I am wrong, I would like to know.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому

      Not sure of the question, which part in the video do you have questions about?

  • @FontanaOutdoors
    @FontanaOutdoors 4 місяці тому

    Please correct me if I’m wrong been studying part 107 a lot I don’t think recreational can fly at night starts in March this year unless you’re part 107 and still you have to have waiver 30 min after sunset 30 min before sunrise

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      That is incorrect. Currently there is no restriction for night flights under 44809. That used to be the rules that recreational could not fly at night but it was changed I believe in 2021.

    • @FontanaOutdoors
      @FontanaOutdoors 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones Thank you very much the only why I’m getting part 107, in March 2024 this will change I believe

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      @@FontanaOutdoors If you could point me to the rule change announcement for 44809 that adds night flight restrictions, or an updated advisory circular (current one I'm aware of is AC 91-57C) with an effective date of the new restriction I'd appreciate it. I think congress would have to pass this and I'm a bit skeptical since the FAA actually recommended the change allowing night flights for recreational pilots in the first place not that long ago. It is the government so anything can happen, but something seems off... Are you studying for 107 with Pilot institute?

    • @FontanaOutdoors
      @FontanaOutdoors 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones I have been busy and did not look in to that yet . I’m almost done with my part 107 study did on my own since I have studied before just to refresh and finally get it over with. Decided finally do it after I saw short video on UA-cam I can’t remember who posted it hopefully it was someone’s mistake I cant believe it can happen but who knows and the congress have to pass it of course glad to find your video channel a lot of good info we will just have to wait and see hope it won’t!!

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +2

      @@FontanaOutdoors No problem. I studied by myself when I got my part 107 and the problem I found by searching things down is that there is a lot of simply wrong and outdated information out there. I don't think I would do it that way again myself but there is something gratifying about doing it yourself too! That's one of the reasons I do these types of video is to try and tamp out the misinformation out there, but it's never ending for sure. Good luck! 🤙🤙

  • @BarrettBivensFishing
    @BarrettBivensFishing 3 місяці тому

    under 249g not need to register recreational and part 107?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      If following all the recreational rules, do not have to register under 249g. If part 107, have to register and add remote ID regardless of the weight, below 249g or not.

    • @BarrettBivensFishing
      @BarrettBivensFishing 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones well,i rather register both if under 249g.it is better to be safe than sorry.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      @@BarrettBivensFishing That is true, but keep in mind if you register for any reason, even if you don't have to, that you need remote ID installed too. That sucks to have to put a RID module on a sub 250 drone, there's not a lot of places to put it and the transmission signal is impeded a little and the battery is used up faster...

  • @jess1t632
    @jess1t632 Місяць тому

    Do I need to have or get an operator ID and how can I get one even if for recreational use only?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  Місяць тому

      What is an operator ID?

    • @jess1t632
      @jess1t632 Місяць тому

      @@AlienDrones I used my drone this morning and checked my drone scanner app it shows my remote ID on the drone scanner app and on the bottom of it says no OPERATOR ID

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  Місяць тому

      @@jess1t632Are you flying in the US?

    • @jess1t632
      @jess1t632 Місяць тому

      @@AlienDrones yes

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  Місяць тому

      @@jess1t632 No Operator ID is necessary in the US, this is a requirement in the EU. A lot of times I'll put a name in there (as I showed when I configured the module in this video ua-cam.com/video/2aOY0ff5_9o/v-deo.html ) but the FAA does not require this. I showed in that vid the broadcast requirements of the rule as well in case you're interested...

  • @slapdat.byteme
    @slapdat.byteme 3 місяці тому +1

    Guess I must be a bi-polar recreational pilot… I have my TRUST certificate, but removed all FAA registration stickers and my phone number from my drones. 😎

    • @charlenemyers188
      @charlenemyers188 3 місяці тому +1

      FAA 107 violation

    • @slapdat.byteme
      @slapdat.byteme 3 місяці тому +3

      @@charlenemyers188 Not if you’re a recreational pilot, Amelia Earhart!

  • @H2oMechanic2RC
    @H2oMechanic2RC 2 місяці тому

    We had 6 drones flying over our home at 1am here in Virginia...any ideas why? One got within 300ft of my house and we could hear it easily.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому

      Should look for a remote ID signal, that's what it is supposed to be for, to help identify the purpose of the flight.

    • @H2oMechanic2RC
      @H2oMechanic2RC 2 місяці тому

      @AlienDrones how can I go about looking for a Remote ID signal? Is there something I can buy? Or a website that shows logs? They were there again last night, but now 1 house down

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  2 місяці тому

      @@H2oMechanic2RC There is no accumulated website, but you can try 3 different apps I'm aware of, OpenDroneID, DroneScanner or AirSentinal, an example here: ua-cam.com/video/CY4syImI9xg/v-deo.htmlsi=9p703fTIN-NLtf6a&t=299 . Some of these don't work on Apple phones, but should give you the idea. Not all drones need remote ID to be legal but it is worth a try if you're curious.

    • @H2oMechanic2RC
      @H2oMechanic2RC 2 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones thanks

  • @fishycomics
    @fishycomics 4 місяці тому

    The rule of thumb. Is BROKEN!😊

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      I broke a finger once and it sucked. Never a thumb though.

  • @rickdavid1795
    @rickdavid1795 3 місяці тому +1

    So if I’m flying a drone for fun, and I’m not having fun it’s illegal..,

  • @exceedinglyaverage1179
    @exceedinglyaverage1179 3 місяці тому

    Big government says “oh noooo, people enjoying themselves?! That stops now”

  • @taranchase9693
    @taranchase9693 4 місяці тому +1

    So.... Does this mean Its always illegal to fly a drone on a coastline/mountain if you cant see it? I just found out about this hobby and its getting yo the point where i can't find a place to fly and im worried about getting in legal trouble. Like, its just as dangerous as someone zooming around with a fast RC car. Come on.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Correct, if you cannot see the drone it is beyond visual line of site and it is illegal. Even if you are close but go behind a building, if you can't see the drone it is BVLOS. Difference with an RC car is they won't divert a flight for life helicopter when it's trying to get to a hospital. In contrast, your RC car isn't in the airspace so an ambulance may have to swerve a bit or will simply run it over and move on. Indeed, some of the drone rules are silly, I get that, but if you think about BVLOS and it is your parent or child in the medical helicopter after an accident, and they have to divert because some random drone is tooling around in their path because it is obviously a stupid rule meant for someone else, somehow it seems a bit more reasonable...

    • @taranchase9693
      @taranchase9693 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones thank you for the reply! I'm just concerned and appreciate your feedback. I watched the live FAA talk that you had previously And I'm just wanting to make sure I follow all the rules properly. I understand the overall purpose of making sure that you're always within line of sight It's just unfortunate that it's a little limiting. I do realize that it would be pretty hard to get in trouble with that for a under sub 250 drone though. It's hard because I'm new but I am looking into making a toothpick possibly, Because I have seen a lot of two S sub 250 that are capable of decent flight and long range.

  • @TheItalianWays
    @TheItalianWays 4 місяці тому

    Boy what a dark matching set !! Even ur shirt good thing the head was moving ❤lol

  • @itsaboutfam
    @itsaboutfam День тому

    I am not a fan of big government but unfortunately you gotta pay to play.

  • @WestVirginiasBigred271
    @WestVirginiasBigred271 4 місяці тому

    I have watched this video twice now. And I have been to the FAA website. But I still can’t find any information saying that a person who is flying recreationally has to take the trust certificate. However I do see where the FAA clearly states that the person who is flying sub 250 grams should still follow the guidelines. And fly in VLOS and below 400 feet. And not to fly near airports or restricted airspace. But the only information that I can find for a person flying recreationally and is below 250 grams does not need to register there drone. And if they don’t have to register they don’t need to take a trust test. If you take a kid who goes to Walmart and gets a toy drone. The kid doesn’t have to take a test to fly their drone in the back yard. It would be hard for the kid who can’t even read yet 😂

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Hello, not sure what you're even saying and I don't know where you're looking because the FAA site does not say some of these things and what you state is simply wrong. From the video, check out rule #7, it is very clear about taking the TRUST test. ua-cam.com/video/b3yQYl7eAeQ/v-deo.htmlsi=TUWt2cjbquyfs5F1&t=108 . This is an actual screenshot from the FAA's website. The actual FAA website is here: www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_flyers and you will see rule #7 with a link to the TRUST test there (towards the bottom). Here is the final link to the TRUST test: www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_flyers/knowledge_test_updates (towards the bottom pick any of the test administrators). Here is a link that takes you directly to one of the test administrators to take the test. www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ Click "Begin Exam". The Video reviews these rules and the cheat sheet has links to most everything talked about. Children are either required to take the TRUST test or the parent must take it and be the responsible pilot supervising the youth. Keep in mind we're talking about recreational only here, if you are doing tutorials or drone testing on a UA-cam channel for instance these rules do not apply, you need to be part 107 certified, not recreational and is regardless if you're monetized or making money or not on that channel. Sorry, I don't know how else I can help but if you have specific questions let us know.

  • @0utcast
    @0utcast 4 місяці тому +43

    Said it ten million times before its easier if you just ignore the rules and fly with common sense

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +5

      Whoo, 10 million, that's a lot.

    • @Mr748Dave
      @Mr748Dave 4 місяці тому +5

      We don't agree. If you are asked for any of the required recreational 44809 documentation and you don't have it, you automatically do not qualify to fly under 44809 and you revert to part 107. If you don't have your part 107 and appropriate documentation and markings on the drone, those are just additional civil violations. This technique of catching recreational operators and writing them up under failed part 107 regs is taught by the FAA in their LEAP training.

    • @senseisecurityschool9337
      @senseisecurityschool9337 4 місяці тому +1

      It's easier to just ignore the rules and drive however you want. Which works okay as long as you keep getting lucky. Then eventually, one day, bad luck happens.
      Then, when sh*t happens, either you were following the rules/law and an accident happened, or you were flagrantly violated all the laws and injured someone. The path from there is very different if you decided to give the federal authorities the finger.

    • @michaeldanforth3059
      @michaeldanforth3059 4 місяці тому +2

      I could not agree more 😊

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому +2

      Bad idea ... really bad idea, FAA and remote ID and banned DJI = $32000 - $100000 fine.

  • @quantumperplexity
    @quantumperplexity 4 місяці тому +2

    I wonder how the Chevron decision revamp that's currently being considered by the Supreme Court will affect drone rules? Will Congress need to specify directly through new legislation?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      It would be interesting to say the least.

    • @bigdatapimp
      @bigdatapimp 4 місяці тому +1

      It will do nothing because no will challenge these regulations in court. Everyone is much too happy with the rules and no one is upset about them. I proved this by attempting to start a legal fund exactly for law suits like that, and no one single person offered to help. Infact Pilot Institute basically said nah, we work with the FAA so we don't think suing them is necessary. A law suit is the only time chevron would come into play.

  • @Shadow-tc1jv
    @Shadow-tc1jv 4 місяці тому +1

    I fly my drone for fun

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому

      Does anyone really anymore? You have to stress over the FAA bullshit before you even take off so you don’t even get the chance to have fun. The FAA makes flying a drone out to be more dangerous than as if driving a car on a congested freeway while half dead on a fentanyl overdose..

  • @hawaiiangunner
    @hawaiiangunner 2 місяці тому +6

    I couldn't care less what rules they make. Have seen that the US government doesn't care about breaking laws themselves why should I care?

  • @SkyPodp
    @SkyPodp 4 місяці тому +2

    And do not drive any faster than the posted speed limit. Lol

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Oops, guess I missed that one. 😅

  • @jasonbeam8592
    @jasonbeam8592 3 місяці тому

    Can you please explain all this to my 7 yr old.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      Sure, no problem. Have them send questions...

  • @TACOMAN2355
    @TACOMAN2355 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for making this video it has cleared many things up and when I want to buy a drone I can show my parents this so they know I don’t need a license to fly one but if I were to fly a custom built FPV drone that weigh about 450grams I wouldn’t sell any photos I’m all good right btw I’m 13 because I think if I did FPV it wouldn’t be in kind of sight because I have my goggles on but if i had someone like my brother watch it I would be good right? Thank you this video helped a lot the only thing that was confusing was the FPV part

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      No part 107 "license" necessary if just sharing with friends and family, but still need to follow the recreational rules shown here and take the TRUST test. It's free and easy, you can't fail and it really does give a lot of good information so you fly safe and have fun!

  • @davebozza1410
    @davebozza1410 3 місяці тому +1

    its time I quit flying before some ass_ole cop arrests me for flying a drone.

    • @ROCKETMANN56
      @ROCKETMANN56 14 днів тому

      I literally bought my HS360S like 2 days ago and im planning on returning it because i just found out about all these rules and regulations and restrictions.

  • @mcgrath16511
    @mcgrath16511 4 місяці тому +3

    Great video!! Yup, leave it to the FAA (aka., the government) to complicate matters!

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing! Indeed, not sure why complicated is the norm, just makes it harder for everyone!

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому +1

      It's not just Fed/FAA, State and Local rules are even more strict and harder to find what can and can't be done and where. Getting a 107 is useless also unless you buy a US only manufactured drone like a Skydio (DJI is banned). Then we have the general public who fear that we're somehow interested in their private lives ... I guess the GP think they are worthy of me wasting my time trying to discover their private lives? Sorry GP, I couldn't care less about your private lives, only your ego's could dream something like that up.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      A clarification, DJI is not banned. It is only using federal funds to buy them for government contracts that is prohibited. Consumers or part 107 pilots can buy and use them or many other drones just fine, at this point.

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones Ok fair enough, per ASDA/NDAA DJI (or any drone not made in the US) can't be purchased by any Federal or State agency (regardless of funding source as to make sure contractors are excluded from using DJI). But realistically, if you're a 107 (flying for money aka commercial), you're NOT going buy any DJI drones now or in the future as that will limit your potential revenue. So sure, technically DJI aren't banned for 107 use, but realistically they will not be purchased by any 107 pilots. On the "recreation" side the laws vary so much from state to state to local that it's impossible to determine what is and isn't permitted ... then there is the VLOS which effectively makes my DJI Mini 4 Pro a 100 yard limit drone because there is no way anyone could see it over 100 yards away.

    • @mcgrath16511
      @mcgrath16511 4 місяці тому

      @@robainscough That is was cool about where I live,, my nearest neighbor is about 75-100 yards away to the east. the next is like 1/4 of a mile! I own at least 1/4 mile to my north, there is a road . a bank down to a creek to my west,, no one there,, to my south is owned by the neighbor to my east.. they could give two giggles where i fly,, they are actually amazed by it. Still I never fly over their houses, just my own. I don't really care what they are doing, !ike i said, you want something screwed up, get the government involved!

  • @jdognutz
    @jdognutz 13 днів тому

    So why they selling drones that fly for miles 🤔 if you need to see them all times

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  13 днів тому

      It is a Spec war on paper to imply "mine is better." Similar to battery life spec, it is so inflated that it is mostly irrelevant so don't be tricked by this. A lot of times it will show 6 km range and you're lucky if you get 1... There is a possible benefit that if one shows 10 km range that hopefully it might have better signal in a "noisy" area than one that states 1 km, but that's about it.

  • @taxxfree4792
    @taxxfree4792 3 місяці тому

    If I’m fighting a misdemeanor marijuana case, but I haven’t been convicted does that disclose me from taking my part 107

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      It does not disqualify you directly. They consider nature of any offences and recency when deciding.

    • @taxxfree4792
      @taxxfree4792 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones OK I’m sold so I take the test and then I go through the background check after and what is your course that you offer or do you offer one? Is it possible to have a conversation off of here?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  3 місяці тому

      @@taxxfree4792 No worries, I don't offer a course myself, but I work with Pilot Institute often who is the best in the industry. They offer a pass or your money back guarantee, and they genuinely are a professional group. You can check it out here and you can get $100 off through this link as well: bit.ly/3rwJrxV (or enter ALIENDRONES in the coupon section) . A lot of really good free information as well...

    • @taxxfree4792
      @taxxfree4792 3 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones cool I just subscribed to your channel. I really would like to speak with someone that has knowledge in. What would this qualify me and what I would have to dispose. I’m currently fighting a misdemeanor marijuana case now, but I haven’t been convicted.

  • @ivanankrom
    @ivanankrom 3 місяці тому

    Ah, I remember when there were no actual FAA-recognized CBOs, though they stated you still needed to follow. Hahaha.

  • @user-kv6qc6jc4m
    @user-kv6qc6jc4m 2 місяці тому +2

    wanna fly for fun??
    Buy a drone
    Get a license, maybe 2 if you want to play and work
    Register it
    Insure it
    Get Remote ID- unless flying a FRIA
    Download a bunch of apps for clearance
    Hope you aren't anywhere near a no fly zone
    find a FRIA
    Pay them
    Pay AMA
    Flying FPV?? You need a buddy
    Have fun, because if you don't follow the rules, you're gonna stack felonies like a Big Mac

  • @timcolton4680
    @timcolton4680 4 місяці тому +3

    Fantastic job, you couldn't have put this simpler. Thank You

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks! I tried to simplify it as much as I could, appreciate you taking the time to share!

  • @hawaiiangunner
    @hawaiiangunner 2 місяці тому

    When I think about all of these drone laws it reminds me that I can buy an ultralight aircraft get in it and fly just about anywhere I want to go with no training and no license. Yeah let me Rush right over there to go fill out that 107 drone BS or whatever else crap they come up with

  • @airadaimagery692
    @airadaimagery692 4 місяці тому +1

    Is there still not just one trusty app that we can use to get all the information/approval we need to fly from one source? What are the most trusted apps used these days?

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому +1

      Hell no. The planet would explode if something simple and straightforward came out.

    • @airadaimagery692
      @airadaimagery692 4 місяці тому

      @@0utcast lol, right!

  • @robainscough
    @robainscough 4 місяці тому +3

    The 9 "simple" rules are for Federal only, then there are State rules, then there are Local rules, even city rules, in fact the FAA/Fed rules are the least of my concerns. Even with recreational purposes, I can't post my video anywhere ... if I place it on UA-cam even when it's NOT monetized, UA-cam still runs ads and it's considered revenue (aka commercial) even if I'm not seeing any of the revenue. Finally my DJI Mini 4 Pro has a 7 mile range, I lose sight of my drone within just a 100 yards because it's tiny (see how the

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing! A quick clarification, if your flight was for fun only, you can post to UA-cam even if UA-cam itself monetizes it. UA-cam would need to have whatever license is necessary to commercialize the content, not you as the originator (but honestly even that's a bit of a stretch). The state and local rules are additional to the FAA portion and can be a pain, but in some areas they can be non-existent as well which is why that was covered here, perhaps you didn't make it quite that far in the video.

    • @bigdatapimp
      @bigdatapimp 4 місяці тому

      ​@AlienDrones not according to the Face of the FAA the "drone guy" he has said many times on many live streams and Q&As at this point, basically if it has a camera on the drone the FAA considers it commercial. That is a huge part of the problem. The right hand has no idea what the left hand is doing at the FAA. No two people will ever give you the same answer. They are purposely making it as confusing and difficult as possible. They want as few people flying as they can get before they launch UTM.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +2

      @@bigdatapimp Sorry, having a camera on the drone does not make it commercial by default in the US. This is simply not the case. (I think I read somewhere that this might be a definition in Europe somewhere). I have talked with Kevin "the drone guy" many times and he has been fairly consistent, to the extent you can be with ambiguous rules. (Here's just one place where he mentions recreational taking pictures and video ua-cam.com/video/R_4B5c61QU8/v-deo.htmlsi=4zKONZ7_ov72Guoj&t=703 ). I agree that different people say different things, and I've experienced this myself. To be fair though, drone rules have changed and evolved over time since this is a relatively new industry, and the FAA has not done a great job of being clear and removing ambiguity and that is certainly a failing. I do try hard to add clarity and simplify things on this channel and most of my content is backed up by hours of emails and phone calls to the FAA and other industry professionals before anything is published. One of the problems is that because things have been evolving, and UA-cam and the internet in general is static (with regard to past content), there can be information out there which was correct at the time but now is no longer valid. So we have a lot of work as consumers to figure it out which is why I always recommend doing your own due diligence...

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому

      @@bigdatapimp Yep, exactly and there is no "Justice" here. One huge point is VLOS ... that alone makes any flight (be it 107 or recreational) illegal. When is the last time you flew your drone with VLOS? And the smaller the drones the sooner VLOS is lost. Nobody seems to really want to talk about VLOS and go on some rant about "well you don't need to look at it all the time" ... that's NOT what VLOS means. So unless we all operate our drones within 100 yards, then we've violated Federal rules and the cops know that and Feds know that and FAA know that. Remote ID is just a big red "come fine me" signal.

  • @dronezonewithradarrob8592
    @dronezonewithradarrob8592 4 місяці тому

    I really wished you would have put recreational in the title!!

  • @googleuser3760
    @googleuser3760 3 місяці тому +1

    Im not FAA property. End of story.

  • @highrider9168
    @highrider9168 4 місяці тому +4

    Im a pirate...i dont register anything 😂

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Do you have a parrot? 🦜Arrrgh...

  • @tallicafan85
    @tallicafan85 Місяць тому

    Dont airplanes fly over people. People are everywhere. So are trees.

  • @fancypicker
    @fancypicker 4 місяці тому +1

    The "announce when powering up" rule is for safety and etiquette when flying analog FPV with others. Powering up can knock somebody's 5.8ghz analog FPV feed out for a second or really degrade the signal. Announcing power up lets other pilots be ready for it.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for sharing

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому

      Fpv shouldn’t even be allowed outside of in a gym or rec building there is zero situational awareness tot he sides or rear. All you see is the front cam bird eye view

    • @fancypicker
      @fancypicker 4 місяці тому

      @@0utcast We've been doing it for years at our local AMA RC club. It's perfectly safe using a spotter ... which is one of the FAA's rules for FPV. You forget that DJI products are also FPV through the DJI fly app. Be careful wishing for FPV to be restricted unless you want DJI products restricted as well.

  • @akush55
    @akush55 26 днів тому

    i take off from USA Land aka: Native American Reservation lot of freaking Air Space 🛸

  • @38josue91
    @38josue91 4 місяці тому

    I thought that FPV FC CBO guidelines required having a fire extinguisher, so I didn't fly my drone until I got one. 😂😂 Guess I didn't need it after all... 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Well, The way some people fly it's probably not a bad idea! 😅🔥🔥

    • @Mr748Dave
      @Mr748Dave 4 місяці тому +1

      Funny. We continue to be an all-volunteer organization advocating the FAA on your behalf. We also spent a year and a half working with Flite Test on a made-in-the USA Remote ID broadcast module. Dave Messina

  • @Mr748Dave
    @Mr748Dave 4 місяці тому +1

    Good video. We wrote the lighting section of the FPV Freedom Coalition Safety Guidelines as we did because in the FAA's guidance, lighting was just that, guidance. Once we stipulated that guidance, it effectively became a rule because the Congressionally passed 44809 statue says recreational operators MUST follow the CBO Safety Guidelines. Dave Messina, Pres & CEO FPV Freedom Coalition.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks! Indeed, it became a bit convoluted. I figure if there were any issues while night flying and the boot and suspenders approach of strobe/orientation lighting were used it will only be better for the pilot for sure.

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 4 місяці тому +1

      The idea that we should have to comply with some club or organization's rules, as a matter of law, when we are not a member of that organization and not flying at one of their facilities is absolutely ridiculous. We should have to follow FAA rules and the FAA rules only. It's like a state saying you have to follow not only state & local driving laws but also the rules of the AAA motor club.

  • @mark33328
    @mark33328 4 місяці тому

    Great thumbnail but if you need a strobe to fly at night then your 249g drone is now MORE than 249g and it would need to be registered.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      True, sometimes. I have a mini that is 237g and the light is ~10g...

  • @jetliorigami
    @jetliorigami 4 місяці тому +1

    Even the cops in my area don't know what a "trust" is. From their own words "we have to much going on to be the FAAs "do" boys"

  • @paulencarnacion
    @paulencarnacion 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for clarifying that CBO requirement. I have my TRUST certificate, but I was always confused about that CBO requirement.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Glad I could help! 🤙

    • @felixruiz2838
      @felixruiz2838 4 місяці тому

      So it's the FAA who is sneaky WOW😂😂😂

  • @mavic2zoom961
    @mavic2zoom961 4 місяці тому +1

    Would love it if you were the first to address the issue that nobody is talking about. If you fly under the recreational exception and you break one the 9 simple rules, your flight could lose the ability to claim the exemption and at that time, you would be subject to all of part 107. Meaning you are likely flying without a certificate, etc. Does this make sense? I understand this is not automatically triggered but it could be applicable and subject you to huge fines because as an intended recreational pilot there are a lot of part 107 rules that you don't comply with. The popular reply is the FAA would never do this but but they *can*, right? I think recreational pilots need some sort of safeguard or assurance that if you make a mistake unintentionally, you won't be thrown into the higher requirements. If forget to bring my TRUST, I could be considered a commercial pilot?

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      I've actually discussed this with the FAA and the message is this: The FAA (or the local LEO) isn't wandering around looking for someone who forgot to bring their TRUST certificate with them or even flying 402'. The important takeaway is that if you are genuinely trying to follow the rules and something happens or if you miss something (though technically that flight would revert to part 107) the FAA will simply work with the pilot to educate so they understand the rules better and that will be that. The real problem comes in when there are repeat offenders that are truly creating a safety problem, like flying down runways or chasing manned aircraft across the sky, then all the rules, defaulting to part 107 and penalties if needed will become a possibility. You really have to be "that guy" that we all read about and think to ourselves "man, that was stupid" to get real penalties levied from the FAA. Being "educated" may be scary or even humiliating, but so far that's the default posture from the FAA so you learn from the experience and "don't do that again"... hope this helps.

    • @highrider9168
      @highrider9168 4 місяці тому

      So basically, if you're trying to just have fun. You're good but if you are intentionally breaking rules then they're gonna make an example of you.
      That the jist?

  • @JustinDavito
    @JustinDavito 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for sharing this info. Very helpful even if I disagree with governments approach!

  • @BluSkyOne1
    @BluSkyOne1 4 місяці тому +2

    Recreational USA USE LAANC Aloft app and stay under 400, other than that ignore FAA, They are enforcing more rules on 600g drone than 250 pound manned ultra light aircraft. None of this will hold up in court if they try and they know it. The goal is dissuade our hobby to clear the airspace for google and amazon.

  • @TheDroneRanger505
    @TheDroneRanger505 4 місяці тому

    I'm a part 107 certified pilot. My question is WHO enforces these rules. Police In my area chuckle at drones and I see rules being broken constantly. Flights in NFZ, near airports, over people, etc. obviously no trust certs or any care for safety. It's a tad frustrating to pay for licensing and be responsible when we "don't have to". The sad part is People in my area are aware that there is no enforcement and I'm asked constantly "why? What's going to happen?"

    • @Paiadakine
      @Paiadakine 4 місяці тому

      It’s not for enforcement a priori, it’s to prosecute you when you cause and accident.

    • @TheDroneRanger505
      @TheDroneRanger505 4 місяці тому

      @@Paiadakine if a drone is unregistered and illegal (excepting minis) and crashes or causes an incident, where and how would any prosecution occur? All that would happen is further regulations put on those of us who already follow the rules. Most of the drones I've seen flown in my area are BVLOS anyway because they already do not know or care for any of the rules. I'm honestly curious and not trying to be argumentative.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@TheDroneRanger505 My 2 cents... That's true with any "hit and run" type crime I suppose, no one may ever find out. In reality, no one is making random stops to check your registration status. But, if the situation is bad enough, say delaying flights at an airport, or someone dies because of it, and they really want to know more, would there be fingerprints on the battery? Serial number tracking from the manufacturer or Amazon? Someone saw you on a dashcam and happened to capture your license plate while you were flying? A ticked off ex-girlfriend? Images on the SD card? Anyway, they may not know, but if they find out AND you were doing EVERYTHING illegal, even the free stuff like the TRUST test, just more ways they will pile on I would imagine. All a gamble and if you feel lucky I guess. I'm never that lucky. 😎

    • @TheDroneRanger505
      @TheDroneRanger505 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones I'm never lucky at all. I simply wish there was some way to achieve better accountability if they're going to regulate the snot out of something that should be an enjoyable and safe hobby. One commenter stated that it's coming to have more regulations than firearms and while I'm very Pro 2A. That commenter is not far from the truth. A frustration and I thank you for your knowledge and time in answering my questions that seem like whining. Lol

    • @OpenCarryUSMC
      @OpenCarryUSMC 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDronesthe idea that following the “law” is “doing the right thing” is highly flawed. We have a duty to ignore government mandates that are unconstitutional, unethical, immoral, exceed authority, etc.
      Congress and the FAA has significantly over stepped their authority for decades and it is no different with drone regulations. The very concept of the “national airspace system” extending from the surface up is all one need look at.
      Sorry, but flying a toy below the tree tops DOES NOT involve national airspace.
      After that, it’s merely a matter of defunding abhorrent government agencies.

  • @SlackerU
    @SlackerU 4 місяці тому +2

    I was filming fireworks on New Years & caught some people illegally shooting guns. There is nobody to send my footage to & dispatch laughs at us b/c they are 'busy'. We need a different Government.

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому

      File a writ of mandamus it's to get a court order requiring some action. I.e. you have a white trash sheriff who doesn't want to enforce gun laws well you do the writ of mandamus and a judge orders the sheriff to enforce the law or the sheriff is in violation of a court order. Unfortunately it isn't free and carries the fees associated with filing a lawsuit since that's what you are doing

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Thanks for trying to do the right thing, but that's sad no one is following up. How about sending it to the local media and mentioning that the local law enforcement doesn't seem to care? Maybe tag the police and the media on TikTok too to enforce the lack of concern by locals. Maybe that will get their attention.

    • @SlackerU
      @SlackerU 4 місяці тому

      ​@@AlienDrones It's a misdemeanor so they don't really care. They will also misinterpret 423 to assume all photos of private-property to be a class C misdemeanor just as 4 of my terrified drone flying neighbors have, I read it as only applying to illegal flights with gunfire on less than 10 acres not qualifying to assume any privacy. I did send screenshots to the wrong government-people, danger on both ends. I'm not deterred to fly free, especially with the somewhat comical-perspectives around the SMSNovel news story about security drones. I should have takin photos of drones in the Christmas-light accessories to better taunt the haters.

    • @Sonic_Ox
      @Sonic_Ox 4 місяці тому

      Let's hope that Karen gets the same run around when she tries to report you for flying your toy around the park with your grandchild.

    • @SlackerU
      @SlackerU 4 місяці тому

      @@Sonic_Ox I absolutely do tell my neighbors to report my RID to the FAA with their Karen-app. Literally the worst ones are those who also happen to think they get the same privacy as our Prison-properties. I address the Government-Cowboys as Y'all Qaeda. I hit a rose-bush hanging over a property-line & it tossed me 1-2ft onto a neighbor so the Constable told my neighbor to not return my drone(uncontrolled-airspace in unincorporated lands). It's not safe out here but it's better that it's me & not the 4 weaker-minded pilots I can see from my front door.

  • @preyingmathis2517
    @preyingmathis2517 3 місяці тому

    Rules? 😂 couldnt care less.

  • @mattalford3932
    @mattalford3932 4 місяці тому +1

    The Supreme Court might remove the Chevron doctrine. Then, every public comment and rule making thing government agencies do won't have deferential treatment. Cant follow rules you dont know exist

  • @mattalford3932
    @mattalford3932 4 місяці тому +1

    And im sure the part 107 requirement to make any money with your drone rule will be challenged. Saying a recreational pilot putting fpv footage on a monetized UA-cam channel must be part 107 is not what Congress had in mind.

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому

      It's worse, even if you don't monetize the footage on UA-cam, UA-cam still runs ads (hence their fight against ad-blockers) and UA-cam is making money from my footage regardless, so the footage is deemed "commercial" so 107 required.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      @@robainscough That's not the way it works for posting a video on UA-cam. If your flight was for fun only, you can post to UA-cam even if UA-cam itself monetizes it, no part 107 required. It's about the intent of the flight when you took it...

    • @robainscough
      @robainscough 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones As you pointed out in your video "intent" is easy to challenge and very difficult to defend in court (ask me how I know). I'd love to be wrong, but been there done that, hated it ... for a country that claims to relish their "freedom", I have more freedom in just about all other European countries and other less developed countries like Africa.

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 4 місяці тому +1

      @@robainscough I would be interested in any court cases you can cite or FAA statements that back up your statements. I have heard a number of people make statements such as yours (can't post to YT if recreational, even if not monetized, and I have also heard others (AlienDrones, PilotInstitute, 51Drones) say the opposite. So I invite you to make your case if you are confident your views are not just a few people's opinion.

  • @Hotwire_RCTrix
    @Hotwire_RCTrix День тому

    Best not to be obvious on noisy. Don't fly near dogs and dogpeople. Disguise your controller as a book or laptop.
    If you post on UA-cam don't say where on when the footage was taken.
    This isn't about safety it's about secrecy of powerful people. 😂
    🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑Bar everything

  • @kkevinj1
    @kkevinj1 4 місяці тому

    Cant believe people dont learn the basic rules before flying, I took the TRUST before the drone was shipped.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      In spite of it being required, it really is informative for those who are new to flying drones...

    • @kkevinj1
      @kkevinj1 4 місяці тому

      @@AlienDrones Yes, taught me more, you helped as well😁

    • @0utcast
      @0utcast 4 місяці тому +1

      @@AlienDrones did it really or did it just inform those with a complete lack of basic kindergarten LOGIC? Go figure DONT crash your drone into someone’s head don’t fly it into a Jets engine etc…

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      @@0utcast You overestimate our modern educational system. 😅

  • @mattmcfaul3358
    @mattmcfaul3358 3 місяці тому

    Lotta people whinning about having regulations when putting a projectile in the air 😂 come on people. Yall need to spend more time striving to be better, rather then just spouting the same weak stance over and over. Regulations allow law enforcement to see when something deviates from the norm. For example: Can't fly at night, but one night, a cop sees a drone going through multiple yards, often stopping at 2nd floor windows. He has a remote id app and pics up the drone. Operator is caught and found to have 20tb of child porn, which he acquired with his 249gram recreational drone. To make matters worse, they find that this operator was also running a website, where he pawned off his footage on various marketplaces on the dark web.
    These regulations are in place to protect you, your family, and everyone elses. There are a zillion scenerios that have already played out, and regulations have to evolve to combat future scenerios from occurring. If anything, i think that any drone with a Camera should be required to broadcast remote I D , and pay the simple $5 registration.

  • @villageidiot8718
    @villageidiot8718 4 місяці тому +1

    Wouldn't 'without visual aids' mean I can't wear my glasses?

    • @kottik1
      @kottik1 4 місяці тому

      Or contacts... 8-/

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому

      Corrective lenses (such as eyeglasses) are specifically called out as an exemption to the "no visual aids" definition, so no problem...

    • @georgeforall
      @georgeforall 4 місяці тому

      Glasses and contacts are ok but not binoculars or telescopes.

  • @derweed40
    @derweed40 4 місяці тому

    I ignore everything about the so called rules for flying, I will not pay you or anyone else for an rc airplane that I bought to tell me I can't fly without BLA BLA BLA, haha a big MIDDLE FINGER TO ALL OF YALL THAT STAND FOR THESE RULES.
    POINT IS TELL THE FAA TO GO AND POUND SAND! FLY ANYWAYS AND EVERYWHERE.

    • @AlienDrones
      @AlienDrones  4 місяці тому +1

      Wait, you were considering paying me? Cool.