Missile Boat Start and Burnout

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 860

  • @Walkerjet200
    @Walkerjet200 2 роки тому +403

    That accelerated quite nicely from a standstill!

    • @_JoeMomma
      @_JoeMomma 2 роки тому +11

      seemed really smooth

    • @JnixMarshel
      @JnixMarshel 2 роки тому +17

      I bet it feels amazing being on that monster during full acceleration

    • @jefferyshall
      @jefferyshall 2 роки тому +1

      That’s classified…if they showed you they’d have to kill you!

    • @emilysmith6897
      @emilysmith6897 2 роки тому +3

      looks like it was about to take off

    • @4Core100
      @4Core100 5 місяців тому +3

      It has hydrofoils, thats why.

  • @carsten.hamburg8771
    @carsten.hamburg8771 2 роки тому +801

    Reminds me of the time in the navy. Fast patrol boat, 4 engines, 4 propellers, 39 knots top speed, 400 tons gross weight. Ridiculous fuel consumption.

    • @MIKE_WOLF_GR
      @MIKE_WOLF_GR 2 роки тому +14

      Jaguar classe type 141?

    • @carsten.hamburg8771
      @carsten.hamburg8771 2 роки тому +24

      @@MIKE_WOLF_GR Gepard (143A)

    • @emamotorbiker
      @emamotorbiker 2 роки тому +25

      Crossing the English Channel in about half an hour ....

    • @MIKE_WOLF_GR
      @MIKE_WOLF_GR 2 роки тому +7

      @@carsten.hamburg8771 my father was at P6070 kondor, the Hellenic navy had bought 6 types of them.

    • @dollcet308
      @dollcet308 2 роки тому +11

      Did your Schnellboot use MTU-Diesels with 3600 PS like those used on the Tiger-Class? If so the consumption was around 30 Tons Diesel a Day, and actually its not all that much if you compare with any Cold-War-Era Tank, most of those consume a half ton Diesel every 100 km.

  • @crfsikness
    @crfsikness 2 роки тому +378

    That thing got up on plane like a damn 12 foot row boat with a 20hp on it! That's some serious power right there!

    • @tbeach3617
      @tbeach3617 2 роки тому +15

      Now that is a fast attack boat.

    • @TearsOnAWind
      @TearsOnAWind 2 роки тому +8

      try to search USSR ships Orlenok (Экраноплан Орленок) or Lun` (Экраноплан Лунь) and your "power" bar will be raised to the ceiling

    • @JoeWayne84
      @JoeWayne84 2 роки тому

      No shot there

    • @localenterprisebroadcastin5971
      @localenterprisebroadcastin5971 2 роки тому +7

      Aren’t turbine powered vehicles awesome 👍

    • @angrydragonslayer
      @angrydragonslayer 2 роки тому +1

      @@TearsOnAWind i saw one of those on liveleak

  • @kirkkirkland7244
    @kirkkirkland7244 2 роки тому +373

    Would have been nice to see the whole boat so we at least know what it looks like!!!

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +275

      Here you go: goteborg2023.com/uploads/2020/09/Punkt-4-Ystad_stor.jpg

    • @johnhillard3717
      @johnhillard3717 2 роки тому +41

      Thanks

    • @simon8089
      @simon8089 2 роки тому +61

      For such a big vessel, the acceleration is incredible!

    • @outcastcwd
      @outcastcwd 2 роки тому +14

      That very much looks like a weapon!!!😎👍

    • @davidscott5903
      @davidscott5903 2 роки тому +7

      @@plutten2
      Thanks!

  • @SeasparrowDD979
    @SeasparrowDD979 2 роки тому +27

    GE LM2500's gas turbine engines. I was a GSM2 onboard the USS Conolly. Nothing like raw power to start your day. 20,000 shaft HP...

    • @timothymilhomme5249
      @timothymilhomme5249 8 місяців тому +1

      “Just a little something “

    • @billyd7882
      @billyd7882 Місяць тому

      We changed out a main engine LM2500 on a Destroyer. They took the top of the stack off and it came right out on a set of rails. Pretty impressive stuff.

    • @Dave5843-d9m
      @Dave5843-d9m 28 днів тому

      That was the huge benefit of GTs. But fuel burn is considerable and part load is not much less juicy than full load. They need BIG fuel tanks.

  • @richardj3353
    @richardj3353 2 роки тому +79

    Reminds me of the Brave class the Royal Navy had in the sixties. Our school was on a hill overlooking the local harbour and we 'd watch them coming out of the harbour at four knots when they were clear of the harbour multi they would open them up and disappear into the distance. I think there were three Brave Bordered, Brave Cutlass and I can 't remember the third. Too noisy to creep up on anything but they didn't need to they could outrun just about anything.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +6

      Thanks for your story

    • @Brooman56
      @Brooman56 2 роки тому

      Brave Swordsman

    • @richardj3353
      @richardj3353 2 роки тому

      @Richard Harrold Thank you, didn't know about Challenger I shall google it.

    • @richardj3353
      @richardj3353 2 роки тому

      @@Brooman56 Thanks, I should have remembered that, but it was a long time ago.

    • @che64
      @che64 2 місяці тому +1

      Ключевое слово- убежать

  • @matthewspry4217
    @matthewspry4217 2 роки тому +140

    It's like the starting up of the original batmobile

    • @caryhuff8924
      @caryhuff8924 2 роки тому +10

      Hahahahaha Good one.... Batteries to power. Turbines to speed............ Launch. Oh, and remember to hold on!

    • @RollingRigTraction
      @RollingRigTraction 2 роки тому

      Yeah pretty useless, shiny, flashy and retarded

    • @dad_jokes_4ever226
      @dad_jokes_4ever226 8 місяців тому

      Was thinking the same thing 😅

    • @slickar2752
      @slickar2752 8 місяців тому

      Before the eco-boost v6 install?

  • @joeviking61
    @joeviking61 8 місяців тому +15

    Gas Turbines are on a whole other level. Incredible power in small packages

    • @madmax2069
      @madmax2069 3 місяці тому +4

      And to think all that started from a steam turbine all the way back in the late 1800s

    • @mothmagic1
      @mothmagic1 2 місяці тому +1

      Hence the reason so many old piston engined aircraft which are still useful (because they are so well suited to the job they do) have been converted to the most used small turboprop, the PT-6.

    • @cherryporter3277
      @cherryporter3277 2 місяці тому +1

      Incredible fuel consumption also.

  • @kennethhigdon1159
    @kennethhigdon1159 2 роки тому +22

    In the immortal words of Dark Helmet:
    “Ludicrous Speed GO!”

  • @uncommonlogic1698
    @uncommonlogic1698 2 роки тому +22

    TRI turbine, TRI Kamewa drives, awesome set-up!!
    Keep on rocking the free world

  • @McHeisenburger
    @McHeisenburger 2 роки тому +6

    excuse me hi sorry but you appear to have got a 747 stuck in your boat somewhere

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому

      Hate when that happens 😁

  • @WickedProxy
    @WickedProxy 2 роки тому +17

    When fully loaded I have a suspicion that almost half its weight is in fuel.

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 8 місяців тому

      It burns over 18 gallons per mile, so yeah!

  • @adriaanboogaard8571
    @adriaanboogaard8571 2 роки тому +33

    Very cool more please. I love boats but I definitely think I would never try to waterski behind that one . I would love a ride on it.😁

    • @ronsamborski6230
      @ronsamborski6230 2 роки тому +1

      I wouldn’t want to be out on deck at top speed, but inside to enjoy the ride would be great!

    • @JH-lo9ut
      @JH-lo9ut 2 роки тому +2

      They take passengers for tours out of Stockholm. It is about 200€ for a day trip. They only run them a few times a year though, late summer.

    • @bradleyshaw8084
      @bradleyshaw8084 2 роки тому

      Norrkoping missle boat

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 2 роки тому +1

      🚫 No, no, their naval missile boat waterskiing team does NOT ski directly behind the boat! Actually, there are two, 18.5 meter long, carbon fibre booms which are extended out from either side of the boat, with an attachment point every 1.6m for all the tow lines. When performing their competitive waterskiing dance routine, there are 20 ski-dancers at once! 😉👍
      Unfortunately, their team came in 3rd place this year to the missile boat waterski-dancing teams from Malta and Canada.....
      ❓🤔❓ For some reason I cannot seem to find photos or video of what I'm talking about here. It's an enigma....

    • @chrillepixla
      @chrillepixla Рік тому

      I rode on that one for 465 days :)

  • @vonbuzz9009
    @vonbuzz9009 2 роки тому +59

    You could ski behind it and roast hotdogs on a stick at the same time!

    • @TheStefanskoglund1
      @TheStefanskoglund1 2 роки тому +8

      A yoke from the old times:the sailors exclaims The Cook CAN fix food-he was roasting hot dogs in the rear. All other food on those boats was premade and reheated in the microwave Owen.

    • @WMJCPA
      @WMJCPA 2 роки тому +5

      Yes, but the buns might get a little soggy.

    • @vonbuzz9009
      @vonbuzz9009 2 роки тому +4

      The buns would be crispy too if you skied backwards.

    • @WMJCPA
      @WMJCPA 2 роки тому +1

      @@vonbuzz9009 Not those buns, but you are correct. Talk about a bun warmer - Pass the Gray Poop Mustard

    • @Ganiscol
      @Ganiscol 2 роки тому +1

      You'd be the roasted hotdog 😉

  • @victorponce7238
    @victorponce7238 2 роки тому +10

    That dam boat was gettn somewhere!
    He was haulin

  • @ttpechon2535
    @ttpechon2535 2 роки тому +10

    The Swedes build some awesome stuff.

  • @TrayPorthos
    @TrayPorthos 2 роки тому +8

    that turbine exhaust would keep a skier nice and dry (and likely crispy)

  • @BruceMusto
    @BruceMusto 2 роки тому +7

    That's cool as hell. Hydrofoil? I served aboard Knox (DE/FF-1052 class) and O.H. Perry (FFG-7 class); and have conducted training aboard every cruiser, destroyer, and frigate that sailed out of Pearl in the 80's and 90's; and not a single solitary one of them could do 40 knots. Damn that looks like fun.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +1

      Glad you like it, thanks for watching!

  • @waynetetley584
    @waynetetley584 2 роки тому +27

    SRN4 cross Channel hovercraft had 4x Bristol Proteus gas turbines - similarly amazing 😊

    • @waynetetley584
      @waynetetley584 2 роки тому

      @Stem Artin ua-cam.com/video/5yM4qzvvsEg/v-deo.html

    • @SportyMabamba
      @SportyMabamba 2 роки тому

      @Stem Artin nah Sea Cat is a catamaran hull. Hovercraft are hovercraft.

  • @kellydowell6445
    @kellydowell6445 2 роки тому +6

    Sounds like an m1 Abrams

    • @incognito5986
      @incognito5986 8 місяців тому +3

      Used to warm myself behind them in the wintertime, keeping my face in clear air.

  • @RobRavenify
    @RobRavenify 2 роки тому +3

    I did 6 months on Hms Stockholm first then 6 months on Hms Norrköping

  • @a.k.a.A.E.1
    @a.k.a.A.E.1 2 роки тому +9

    thats a real exhaust tube !

  • @joelandrum9803
    @joelandrum9803 2 місяці тому

    I was enlisted co-pilot (ET1) on USS Plainview, 2 J-79s putting out 30,000 HP going through 2, 5ft titanium screws. 220 feet, 300 tons.
    We got her up to 43 knots. Left a hell of a rooster tail all over Puget Sound in 1970.

  • @Damien.D
    @Damien.D 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for sharing.
    Love the sound of gas turbine starting up.
    (beautiful boat by the way).

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 місяці тому

      Thanks for watching!

  • @benskai2475akurfishing
    @benskai2475akurfishing 2 роки тому +2

    Greetings from Indonesia, senior Arup Archipelago, Maluku province on the Indonesian border with Australia

  • @amessman
    @amessman Рік тому

    Looks like a hot start on those turbines.

  • @raygale4198
    @raygale4198 2 роки тому +18

    One hell of a ski boat

    • @MrWallinor
      @MrWallinor 2 роки тому

      With a rocket exhaust in your face haha

    • @stefanlageambecker6077
      @stefanlageambecker6077 2 роки тому +1

      Yepp 👍

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar 2 роки тому +1

      didn't nessesarily need skis, the boat is fast enough to pull you along on your bare feet alone.

    • @JH-lo9ut
      @JH-lo9ut 5 місяців тому

      You would probably die from the insane vibration and hot exhausts.
      I've been about 150 meters behind this ship as it turned around in the harbour, at close to idle speed, and the amount of noise almost made me shit my pants. It is insane.

  • @patreilly6826
    @patreilly6826 8 місяців тому +1

    The Pegasus class hydrofoil was powered by a GE LM2500 pushing 18,000 SHP and 2 MB 800 HP diesels. Top speed 50 knots on foils and 12 knots cruising on diesels alone. Could pass everything but a fuelling station as it sucked back 1000 gallons an hour of diesel fuel in go fast mode. Only built 6 of them.

  • @kdorman1085
    @kdorman1085 7 місяців тому +1

    One of my friends worked for Vosper Thornycroft he used to tell me about testing the Perkasa torpedo boats on the Solent 4 gas turbine Rolls-Royce Proteus engine's he used to say they were very fast

  • @Bullzeye1000yds
    @Bullzeye1000yds 7 місяців тому

    Hey. The old PT Boats had a range of 500 miles. Flank speed of 40kts. 4- Ma Deuces and 4- 21" torpedo tubes.
    Still have a few around.
    They are pretty nice.

  • @stevenwilgus8982
    @stevenwilgus8982 2 роки тому +5

    God I love power and acceleration....

  • @gearlooze
    @gearlooze 2 місяці тому +2

    Reminds me of the Danish Willemoes Class missile-torpedo boats I served on from 1990-91

  • @MIKE_WOLF_GR
    @MIKE_WOLF_GR 2 роки тому +1

    I am a member of missile boat too i have to say it have 4 MTU's engines and the noise looks like a lot with this one

  • @Imwright720
    @Imwright720 2 роки тому +23

    That sounded insane. Only taxpayer dollars could afford to fuel that thing.

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 8 місяців тому +1

      Over 18 gallons every mile, so yeah!

    • @lamarrrrr
      @lamarrrrr 5 місяців тому +1

      ⁠@@charlieodom9107What, really???

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 5 місяців тому

      @lamarrrrr yes. There is extensive data on these boats and their stupidly excessive fuel consumption. I think the fuel consumption is why they weren't used longer.

  • @TheJimbob1603
    @TheJimbob1603 2 роки тому +5

    Man, I'd like to see the reduction gear on that beast!
    And, who makes these large format gear boxes .... GE? Westinghouse? TRW?

    • @samm2091
      @samm2091 2 роки тому

      Bristol proteus is the company that produced this powerplant I think they were turboprop turbines primarily

  •  2 роки тому +2

    I was on hms Piteå, T138, later R138, 1976. Really nice boats.

  • @davidsnyder2000
    @davidsnyder2000 2 роки тому +3

    1st time seeing this on a boat other than hydro racing. Pretty cool😄👍

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +1

      Glad you like it, thanks for watching!

  • @kennethlippertshauser3376
    @kennethlippertshauser3376 2 роки тому +1

    Cool. Thanks for the Ride.

  • @alanmilligan3874
    @alanmilligan3874 2 місяці тому

    The Royal Navy had two similar boats based in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover. Very efficient in chasing pirates too…. Rumour has it they were gifted to the Phillipene Navy.

  • @SCADOOSH69
    @SCADOOSH69 2 роки тому +4

    I totally need this motor on my bass boat!

  • @deejaytrizay
    @deejaytrizay 2 роки тому +4

    Is there any real useful/rational reason to have jets on a boat? I'm mostly referring to the fuel vs. distance/speed /upkeep and maint./parts etc.

    • @om617yota8
      @om617yota8 2 роки тому +4

      Power to weight ratio is it. Turbines guzzle fuel, but can weigh 1/10th as much as a comparable HP marine engine.

    • @tapioportimo2551
      @tapioportimo2551 2 роки тому +1

      Size and weight savings. Partly offset by big reduction gears and more fuel needed. But when cost is no object, why not?

    • @om617yota8
      @om617yota8 2 роки тому

      @@deejaytrizay It's the YT comment section, I wasn't going to write a doctoral dissertation.

    • @Solnoric
      @Solnoric 2 роки тому +1

      When you need raw power nothing else comes close. You can also run them on mixed fuels in an emergency (not good for the turbine but can be done)

    • @tapioportimo2551
      @tapioportimo2551 2 роки тому +2

      @@Solnoric As long as it is in the fuel oil/Jet A1/diesel family. US Army helicopters can be run on normal diesel fuel for 24 hours in an emergency, but after that the engine must be taken apart and cleaned. Basically the difference between those fuels is just the quality and cleanliness standards, the stuff itself is more or less the same.

  • @ronliebermann
    @ronliebermann 8 місяців тому +1

    I’m not sure what they mean by “Missile Boat” but nowadays a torpedo can be delivered by helicopter.
    Choppers have a range of about three hundred miles, and can drop a torpedo into the water within a mile of the target.
    What does this very expensive missile boat do?

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  8 місяців тому

      Hey, this boat is not in service anymore. It is from the cold war era.

  • @PsRohrbaugh
    @PsRohrbaugh 2 роки тому +12

    Absolutely amazing!

  • @andersstenlund6699
    @andersstenlund6699 2 роки тому +22

    Pretty respectfull when you meet any Svedish military boat/ship when out in the archipelago of the Swedish coast, Pure power and ammo to attack any enemy.

    • @tomp8871
      @tomp8871 2 роки тому

      you may need it

    • @admiralfaffy
      @admiralfaffy 2 роки тому

      they have fast boats that can do 60 miles per hour and carry those AMOS twin 120mm mortar turrets... it could smash tanks to pieces from a mile away and be gone up the fjord in seconds.

    • @Михаил-в5ф9ы
      @Михаил-в5ф9ы 2 роки тому

      Нечем скоро заправляться будет

    • @SonsOfLorgar
      @SonsOfLorgar 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@admiralfaffy nope, Sweden cheaped out of the AMOS programme just as it was ready for serial production.
      The Finns stuck with it and uses it iirc.
      Later in 2014, Swedish politicians got a rude wakeup call as Putin invaded and occupied Crimea, then they ordered the Mjölner dual tube protected semi-turret mortar system on CV90 chassi.
      a simpler and slightly more conventional system than AMOS with assisted muzzle loaded tubes capable of MRSI but not as many shells simultaneously and without direct fire capability iirc.
      On the plus side, the Mjölner can load any length of 12cm mortar ammo with the crew inside while the AMOS could not fit the assembled STRIX anti-tank shell into it's breech loading system and had to have crew load it from the outside standing on the vehicle hull iirc.

  • @FarhanSpecialty
    @FarhanSpecialty 2 місяці тому

    The terms "Start" and "Burnout" in the context of missile boats and missile operations typically relate to missile launch and propulsion phases. Here’s an explanation of these terms in detail:
    ---
    ### 1. **Start Phase** (Missile Launch)
    The *start* phase refers to the initiation of the missile's launch sequence. This is the point when the missile is fired, leaving its launcher or vertical launch system (VLS). Key aspects of the start phase include:
    - **Ignition:** The missile's rocket motor is ignited, generating the thrust required to propel it.
    - **Guidance Activation:** The missile's onboard systems, such as inertial guidance or GPS, are initialized to guide the missile toward its target.
    - **Initial Thrust:** During the start phase, the missile begins accelerating under the power of its rocket motor.
    - **Launch Platform Dynamics:** Depending on the missile and launch platform (e.g., a missile boat or ship), the platform may need to account for recoil or other effects of launch.
    For missile boats, this phase is critical as the launch must be coordinated with the boat's movement and environmental conditions (e.g., sea state, wind, or enemy countermeasures).
    ---
    ### 2. **Burnout Phase** (End of Propulsion)
    The *burnout* phase refers to the point when the missile's propulsion system (usually a solid rocket motor) expends all its fuel and stops producing thrust. Key aspects of the burnout phase include:
    - **End of Powered Flight:** After burnout, the missile transitions from powered flight to unpowered (ballistic or gliding) flight, depending on its design.
    - **Cruise or Terminal Phase Initiation:** For missiles that have a secondary propulsion system (e.g., a ramjet or scramjet), burnout of the initial booster might transition into the activation of the secondary propulsion. Otherwise, the missile proceeds to its terminal phase using kinetic energy and guidance systems.
    - **Range Limitation:** The missile's maximum range is determined by the energy and velocity achieved before burnout.
    - **Guidance Continuation:** Even after burnout, the missile's guidance and control systems remain active to ensure it stays on course.
    ---
    ### Example in Context: Anti-Ship Missiles
    For a missile boat launching an **anti-ship missile**, these phases work together as follows:
    1. **Start:** The missile is launched using its booster or primary propulsion system. The boat's crew ensures proper targeting and launch timing.
    2. **Powered Flight:** The missile accelerates toward its target, guided by radar, GPS, or other systems.
    3. **Burnout:** Once the motor burns out, the missile relies on its momentum and guidance systems to reach the target. In some cases, a secondary propulsion system may take over for long-range strikes.
    ---
    ### Operational Considerations for Missile Boats
    - **Tactical Timing:** The crew must carefully time launches to avoid detection or counter-strikes.
    - **Positioning:** Missile boats often rely on speed, stealth, and mobility to get into an effective firing position.
    - **Post-Launch Maneuvers:** Once missiles are launched, the missile boat may need to relocate to avoid retaliation or countermeasures.
    These phases (start and burnout) play a crucial role in the effectiveness of missile operations and the overall success of the mission.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 місяці тому

      Wow! Thanks for detailed info (and for watching) 👍

  • @Squee7e
    @Squee7e Місяць тому +1

    0:38
    Boat: Missile Boat R142 ready for takeoff
    Tower: R142 you're clear for takeoff, fly safe

  • @GWNorth-db8vn
    @GWNorth-db8vn 2 місяці тому +1

    When I was a kid, they promised me cars would sound like this by now.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 місяці тому +1

      That would be loud rush hour traffic 😂

  • @DIYNauticalDream
    @DIYNauticalDream 2 роки тому +23

    Wow that's impressive. So fast!

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +10

      Impressive for such a big boat (240 tonnes)

  • @christopherweber4745
    @christopherweber4745 2 місяці тому +3

    "Frying chickens in the barnyard." (Dr Strangelove)

  • @KrotowX
    @KrotowX 2 роки тому +5

    A bit more and this boat will be able to compete in the "from 0 to 100" category.

  • @stavinaircaeruleum2275
    @stavinaircaeruleum2275 2 роки тому

    Aw man the sound of that turbine spooling up and operating is orgasmic

  • @craigarmstrong5291
    @craigarmstrong5291 3 місяці тому

    Meny Tons moving with such power fantastic 👏

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  3 місяці тому

      Indeed! 230 tons...

  • @andyharpist2938
    @andyharpist2938 2 роки тому +19

    Does it have afterburners?

    • @AndrewCZ47
      @AndrewCZ47 2 роки тому +16

      Nope, it's like turbines on a helicopter, just in this case they drive propellers instead of a rotor.

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 2 роки тому

      @@AndrewCZ47 And that means those engines could easily have had afterburners. Why not?

    • @integr8er66
      @integr8er66 2 роки тому +4

      @@voornaam3191 Because it would serve ZERO purpose, they do not propel the boat by jet thrust, thus an after burner would do nothing but waste fuel. This is a turboshaft engine while afterburners are on turbojet

    • @AndrewCZ47
      @AndrewCZ47 2 роки тому +3

      ​@@voornaam3191 The boat doesn't use thrust, there's a lot of exhaust but it doesn't have very high speed (most of its energy was used to turn the turbine, it's the same, say, with the Abrams tank, you don't see it blowing stuff around even at full power). If you added afterburners, you'd gain very little thrust but increase fuel consumption many times.
      Basically with AB you'd get a boat that looks awesome, moves about half of a knot faster and burns five times more fuel. And for a military boat it's more important to have five times more range than to look cool.

    • @BlackWolf42-
      @BlackWolf42- 2 роки тому +3

      This boat needs those engines to generate large volumes of hot gas to drive a power turbine. They generate no thrust from the exhaust the way a turbojet engine does.

  • @hugejohnson5011
    @hugejohnson5011 2 роки тому +5

    50 MPH, give or take, in a heavy hunk of steel like that is quite something on water! How quickly can it come to a stop? The water must help, but still, "Equal and opposite reaction" and all the other stuff that I was too dumb to learn!

    • @fearest288
      @fearest288 2 роки тому +2

      If I remember right, you stop this 240 metric tons in less that 60meters.

  • @Ghostrider-71
    @Ghostrider-71 2 роки тому +2

    Ah yes, the brutal power of the singing gas turbine.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +1

      Turbines are pretty awesome🤘

  • @DefendTheStar
    @DefendTheStar 2 роки тому +1

    Ridiculous amounts of power.

  • @derrickmoses1507
    @derrickmoses1507 2 роки тому +2

    Unit ready, aye sir!

  • @tomcline5631
    @tomcline5631 2 роки тому +6

    Is it a water jet or geared to props?

  • @stefanjohansson3670
    @stefanjohansson3670 2 роки тому +22

    R134 Varberg 1986, Karlskrona

  • @garthmiller6932
    @garthmiller6932 2 роки тому +2

    I could ski behind that thing.. And I think I would enjoy it.

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 2 роки тому

      And I think you have reason to believe you are right. I think ANYBODY can waterski behind this thing. On one bare foot. On ones nose. On a bald head.

  • @MrSatanLucyferis
    @MrSatanLucyferis 2 роки тому +1

    Does it have propellers run by turbo shaft engines or those are jet engines? lol The sound is incredible 🥰

    • @MrSatanLucyferis
      @MrSatanLucyferis 2 роки тому

      @dvs0180 yes, but does the turbo shaft run the propellers or there is no propellers and it just works on jet propulsion?

    • @juggis
      @juggis 2 роки тому +3

      @@MrSatanLucyferis shaft runs propellers.

  • @brucebaxter6923
    @brucebaxter6923 2 роки тому +2

    Can anyone explain the burnout start?
    I am not familiar with the surge type starting?

    • @louishunter9249
      @louishunter9249 2 роки тому +2

      Gas turbines aka jet engines. They start the same way as jets do. Get the turbine spinning fast hit the ignitor and introduce the fuel=big flames out the exhaust.

    • @brucebaxter6923
      @brucebaxter6923 2 роки тому +2

      @@louishunter9249
      Yes, but this one didn’t.
      It had intentional surging introduced and I was wondering why?
      They are calling it a “burnout” startup vs a normal startup.

    • @louishunter9249
      @louishunter9249 2 роки тому +3

      @@brucebaxter6923 sorry didn't know what knowledge base you were working with. Looked like introduction of too much fuel. I know the temps can spike quickly and it would be called a hot start and you need to shut down and tear down. Not sure here.

    • @brucebaxter6923
      @brucebaxter6923 2 роки тому +3

      @@louishunter9249
      Yes. It certainly looked like over fuelling as pulses.
      I wonder if each pulse was too short to do damage but long enough to clear out excess water or something in the exhaust perhaps?

    • @louishunter9249
      @louishunter9249 2 роки тому +3

      @@brucebaxter6923 I would have to agree switching or pulsing fuel on and off to avoid a hot or hang start. I have aviation experience and I've never seen it purposely done like that.

  • @B020oso
    @B020oso 2 місяці тому

    Cool videos,regards from🇧🇻

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 місяці тому

      Thanks for watching!

  • @mattdaugherty7865
    @mattdaugherty7865 8 місяців тому +3

    “It’s better to burnout than fade away!”

  • @JerryWang-pp3fz
    @JerryWang-pp3fz 9 місяців тому

    The most American boat I’ve ever seen 🦅🦅🦅

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  9 місяців тому

      I see your point, but it was very Swedish back then. :)

  • @kn6123
    @kn6123 2 роки тому

    The sound is really cool 😎

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому

      It really is :) Thanks for watching!

  • @SCCIT-jq6jh
    @SCCIT-jq6jh 2 роки тому +1

    Axial flow forever man.

  • @brmnplayr
    @brmnplayr 2 роки тому +2

    Ok i have a Glider 7meter with Steyr M266 Engine and an Alamarin Jet Propulsion. I was Satisfied untill now😭 ❤🇩🇪😎 Awesome

  • @fredtedstedman
    @fredtedstedman 3 роки тому +5

    Ystad 😍😍😍😍

  • @ponyrang
    @ponyrang 2 роки тому

    Wow... !!! My best friend, Great Good... !!! I wish you every day of your development.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @chrillepixla
    @chrillepixla 2 роки тому +11

    Gålö ❤️ .... på Halmstad själv

  • @juscool2463
    @juscool2463 2 роки тому +1

    OMG that wake is insane

  • @first-up-best-dressed5548
    @first-up-best-dressed5548 2 роки тому +1

    Tidy looking boat..
    Ships are commercial .
    Thanks for posting.

  • @ficosk8
    @ficosk8 3 місяці тому +1

    Wow!! Did not knew that! 👍🏼

  • @Tjalle
    @Tjalle 2 роки тому +2

    Those missile boat's are taken out of the swedish navy, they have the Visby class now

  • @billlander3700
    @billlander3700 2 роки тому +1

    So good

  • @andrewsmart2949
    @andrewsmart2949 2 роки тому +1

    those thirsty turbine engines are something else

  • @scottt172
    @scottt172 2 роки тому +1

    Wow its like a Top Fuel boat

  • @jimmiller5600
    @jimmiller5600 2 роки тому +3

    Here's the history on this class of missile boat --- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norrk%C3%B6ping-class_missile_boat

  • @spitfireboy1
    @spitfireboy1 2 роки тому +2

    I have a 4 foot long radio controlled model of this boat.

    • @rhsweden
      @rhsweden 2 роки тому

      and why not a vieo of it on youtube ? 😎

  • @kenbennett5458
    @kenbennett5458 8 місяців тому

    Cor wish there was more content and length to this video I started to model one of these I believe it is the same type of boat my model is of percasa, I might get around to finishing it one of these days . The lake that my model boat club used closed and there was no more water / lakes that the club could use or afford so it disbanded and I didn't see the point of finishing it off but if I could see more video footage it might get the juices flowing again and just keep it as a static scale model.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  8 місяців тому

      Perhaps I can come around with some more content on this boat ;)
      Best of luck on your project!

  • @MrTimodon
    @MrTimodon 2 роки тому +19

    Nylands Brigad hälsar!

  • @GreyerShade
    @GreyerShade 2 роки тому +1

    Theres a Tacobell joke in here somewhere! 😂 🤣💨💨💨

  • @HR-rt9nh
    @HR-rt9nh 2 роки тому +4

    These are not SMALL ships these are BIG ships ! and it took of like it was floating on air....

  • @jimstokes2942
    @jimstokes2942 2 роки тому +1

    Reminds me of a law enforcement boat I saw late at night off the Florida Keys

  • @TheBaron481
    @TheBaron481 2 роки тому +1

    Wow! What great boat

  • @geennaam1201
    @geennaam1201 2 місяці тому +1

    The water around that boat is now 5c warmer

  • @peterwood2633
    @peterwood2633 2 роки тому +1

    Reminded me of judge dread to get back into the city

  • @alfasweden
    @alfasweden 2 місяці тому

    Spika båt ?
    Jag Var på tp 44 med 3 x isotta frachini polar motorer, fint ljud 😀

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 місяці тому

      Nej, R142 Ystad är annan klass, men Spica är också coola.

  • @keno77
    @keno77 2 роки тому +2

    Horsepower please, I just saw in the description 13000 HP

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 2 роки тому

      Call the ship yard. Order one. Then you'll know these silly numbers. Who cares? The insurance company, maybe?

    • @donjones4719
      @donjones4719 2 роки тому

      13000 HP = 13000 Horse Power.
      I assume you're serious and this is a language barrier and metric barrier thing. That's 9.56 megawatts.

  • @imtheone214
    @imtheone214 2 роки тому +1

    Nice wake boat

  • @Tech_Duster
    @Tech_Duster 2 роки тому +1

    Silky smooth

  • @marccampbellsr1085
    @marccampbellsr1085 8 місяців тому +1

    I wouldn't " tube " behind that even when I was younger ....😂😂

  • @sorenweisshartmann
    @sorenweisshartmann 2 роки тому

    Wow so cool. Thanks for sharing

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому

      Thanks for watching!

  • @louishunter9249
    @louishunter9249 2 роки тому +3

    The LCS class ships should have really hauled butt with the CoDAG setup. Too bad. They just couldn't figure out the hull cracking and combining gear problems. Alot of potential went to waste.

    • @the_retag
      @the_retag 8 місяців тому +1

      Which is stupid. German frigates run codag just fine, and german sar vessels are built from aluminium and last 30y or more in rough conditions. The tech existed

  • @Nashcaster
    @Nashcaster 2 роки тому +1

    Cool.

  • @feellucky271
    @feellucky271 2 роки тому +6

    It appears to have propellers as well as the rocket assist pretty damn cool,thanks for the upload on the still photograph that's a pretty sleek-looking boat.

    • @plutten2
      @plutten2  2 роки тому +22

      Thanks! Props are the only propulsion, but they are driven by turbine engines.

    • @feellucky271
      @feellucky271 2 роки тому +1

      @@plutten2 Silly me.
      Thanks Jorgen.
      Great video and I screen pic ed the whole vessel.
      Commenting whilst half asleep....greeting from Florida US of A
      Peace

    • @cc-xu5tr
      @cc-xu5tr 2 роки тому

      @@feellucky271 another florida man i see... respect

    • @scootypuffjr.
      @scootypuffjr. 2 роки тому

      Wtf are you talking about rocket assist lol. This is the boat version of a turboprop.

  • @nickmaclachlan5178
    @nickmaclachlan5178 2 роки тому +1

    That thing really hustles......

  • @8180634
    @8180634 17 днів тому

    I bet it takes some serious logistics to keep those things going during a conflict. Lots of fuel to move!

  • @StevenSmith6942_
    @StevenSmith6942_ 2 роки тому +4

    that is so cool... thanks for the adventure...