How Tensions Grew Between Mao's China & Khrushchev's Soviet Union | Mao's Cold War | Timeline

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 чер 2020
  • The Sino-Soviet solidarity was once deemed eternal but from the beginning of their alliance, the Chinese were frustrated by an unequal relationship with the Soviets.
    It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service, at a huge discount using the code 'TIMELINE' ---ᐳ bit.ly/3a7ambu
    You can find more from us on:
    / timelinewh
    / timelinewh
    This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,8 тис.

  • @SawdEndymon
    @SawdEndymon 4 роки тому +1170

    Remember when the History channel had documentaries like this?

    • @mindstate1
      @mindstate1 3 роки тому +95

      I guess you are not a fan of Ancient Alien s .

    • @67nairb
      @67nairb 3 роки тому +72

      now it's almost nothing but reality shows with almost little to do with history.

    • @yuriyu123
      @yuriyu123 3 роки тому +32

      I 'member!

    • @avery-san8692
      @avery-san8692 3 роки тому +36

      Pepperidge farm remembers

    • @67nairb
      @67nairb 3 роки тому +23

      A&E or ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT had documentaries like this in the 1980's and 90's.

  • @javierperalta7648
    @javierperalta7648 3 роки тому +691

    Mao: The Soviets are getting too friendly with the West
    Also Mao: *shakes Nixon's hand*

    • @turin2488
      @turin2488 3 роки тому +27

      😂😂😂

    • @realchinese9834
      @realchinese9834 3 роки тому +18

      CCP will be gone next year. its 2021 now, lets see.

    • @hugbug4408
      @hugbug4408 3 роки тому +6

      @@realchinese9834 Yulin dog meat trade June22st to June 30th. It's a dog eat dog world aint no lie for it isn't safe to walk the streets @ night----I'm doin fiiiiine on cloud nine !

    • @lordarogon9373
      @lordarogon9373 3 роки тому

      @@realchinese9834 lets see

    • @Munthasir123
      @Munthasir123 3 роки тому +44

      Mao: We wont let western country treat some of our provinces like colonies…
      Also Mao to Soviets: Here gimme money and you can treat Manchuria like your colony instead.

  • @ziqi92
    @ziqi92 2 роки тому +350

    Excellent documentary. As a Chinese American immigrant, my parents grew up through the Cultural Revolution but were never able to articulate the chaos they grew up in. American education completely glossed over China's role in the Cold War. I never knew that Mao's weird on-off relationship with the Soviet Union was the main reason why his domestic policies came about the way they did. It's heart-breaking, honestly.

    • @hykkk3758
      @hykkk3758 2 роки тому +8

      还会说中国话不

    • @vasili1207
      @vasili1207 2 роки тому +6

      @@hykkk3758 不会说 pork bun army .... china is going to pay the ultimate price...

    • @fanyechao2761
      @fanyechao2761 2 роки тому +11

      @@vasili1207 what price?

    • @vasili1207
      @vasili1207 2 роки тому +12

      @@fanyechao2761 at least two woks .... maybe three

    • @terrycoontz
      @terrycoontz 2 роки тому +10

      Kind of nuts they couldn’t make out what was going on…it’s that old saying they didn’t come for me so I kept quiet.

  • @bradmossman7201
    @bradmossman7201 3 роки тому +61

    Trust between the Soviets and Mao was always fraught. The Soviets initially backed Chiang Kai-shek in the 1920s.

    • @connorhenry9599
      @connorhenry9599 2 роки тому +2

      Do you know why the Soviets backed Chiang? I never knew this until now.

    • @coryplum5375
      @coryplum5375 2 роки тому +1

      @@connorhenry9599 KMT in that time was very similar with CCCP and they had their own army.

    • @anyuezhang743
      @anyuezhang743 2 роки тому +1

      @@connorhenry9599 they never fully believed that the red army, which was largely guerrilla forces up until after 1945, could win. And only up until the end of the war did the GMD drift more towards the right- they were actually vaguely socialist before the outbreak of the civil war.

    • @user-lh7mp4jg4o
      @user-lh7mp4jg4o 2 роки тому

      because mao said The countryside surrounds the city,stalin thought he is nationalists and not a communist

    • @lvjinbin28
      @lvjinbin28 Рік тому

      soviet even promised to give weapon to taiwan for retaking mainland after 1969, but kmt refused soviet because kmt is anti-commi and american girlfriend

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 4 роки тому +622

    This is history not taught in school. I had no idea about this. This puts a new spin on things happening in the 60's and beyond. Thank you.

    • @Orcawhale1
      @Orcawhale1 4 роки тому +38

      It most certainly is, just not in America due to public school system being so defunded over the years.

    • @brianjungen4059
      @brianjungen4059 4 роки тому +48

      @@Orcawhale1 that and the simple fact that you can't teach every aspect of every country's history "in school". We'd all be in school our whole lives trying to learn history if that's what people want....

    • @Orcawhale1
      @Orcawhale1 4 роки тому +23

      @@brianjungen4059 No, but you can cover the most important events in history. Which this falls under..

    • @Cheka__
      @Cheka__ 3 роки тому +4

      What's History?

    • @gavnonadoroge3092
      @gavnonadoroge3092 3 роки тому +11

      its called propaganda, china got free west technology from this

  • @sabrinaw4437
    @sabrinaw4437 3 роки тому +213

    “Why don’t you get rid of Mao” 🤣 said to the Chinese delegation. USSR really had balls, well, used to have!

    • @LWang-li5rx
      @LWang-li5rx 3 роки тому +8

      he was too drunk i guess xDD

    • @Chironex_Fleckeri
      @Chironex_Fleckeri 3 роки тому +38

      The Soviets were terrifyingly powerful in conventional ground warfare, even next to the US. They also were probably emboldened by their well-developed nuclear triad. China had no real response to what the USSR could throw at them.

    • @gonkong5638
      @gonkong5638 3 роки тому +18

      @@Chironex_Fleckeri Even Russia right now still number 2. China airforce and navy were complete joke compare to them. Oh and the Tank too.

    • @zaraiwzara
      @zaraiwzara 3 роки тому +2

      @@gonkong5638 i think that speaking about states only, the soviets were number one, after all they had 11 million active soldiers, and more tanks than the us

    • @zaraiwzara
      @zaraiwzara 3 роки тому +5

      @@gonkong5638 but china will surpass russia in the next few decades

  • @coffeelink943
    @coffeelink943 3 роки тому +74

    Shout out to the camera mans that was able to capture these footage so we can watch them today. Imagine trying to record with sound of gun shooting and explosive around you

    • @deneshbhaskar3944
      @deneshbhaskar3944 3 роки тому +4

      Thank u . I recorded most of the footage of the user China rift.

    • @senseitubagoo1345
      @senseitubagoo1345 2 роки тому +1

      There are tons of videos from ww2 where you see bullets hitting the ground and walls just a few feet away from the soldiers being filmed, especially in the footage of the liberation of Stalingrad

    • @Glory_inthe_3rd77
      @Glory_inthe_3rd77 2 роки тому +1

      I'm not sure if the guy/girl you're doing a shout-out to can hear/read you.

    • @cosmoray9750
      @cosmoray9750 2 роки тому

      Julian Assange
      ua-cam.com/video/wxeY0RBJfSo/v-deo.html

  • @andro7862
    @andro7862 3 роки тому +38

    My mother still remembers the events of 1969. The entire USSR was on the edge. They were terrified it would be nuclear war.

    • @Barbaraluna2350
      @Barbaraluna2350 Рік тому

      All world was on the edge.my parents were sitting next to radio all day waiting to hear news .it was very very close to red button.but here we go again approaching cold war again

  • @noeenricodomanais2517
    @noeenricodomanais2517 4 роки тому +460

    A cold war within the Cold War

  • @douglasianscott3599
    @douglasianscott3599 4 роки тому +848

    This documentary is a pretty China heavy point of view. It would be nice to hear a few Russian voices in this as well. Not just Chinese.

    • @dingliedangliedoodle9261
      @dingliedangliedoodle9261 4 роки тому +84

      Did you notice the name of the title? Sure, we'd like to hear from the other POV too, but there's a lot of things to unpack and it's not going to happen in 1 documentary.

    • @kevinhu8415
      @kevinhu8415 4 роки тому +32

      The problem is the USSR is no longer existing.....but of course I agree with you,it now looks just like a one side show for my country 🙄

    • @ShangZilla
      @ShangZilla 4 роки тому +59

      Interviewing employees of Chinese state universities. Ofc they are not going to criticize China or Mao.

    • @WorldEagleKW
      @WorldEagleKW 3 роки тому +31

      You can read Khrushchev's memoir. It's quite interesting especially on this part of history.

    • @MegaBanne
      @MegaBanne 3 роки тому +15

      I highly doubt that this isn't the only documentary about this topic. It was nice to see it from one side, so that one could later view a similar documentary from the other side. That is the best way to do it. Mixing up the perspectives of both sides kind of loses the human side of things. What was real life for some just becomes a foot note in history. When the cold war becomes a game of chess, where the people disappear as the molecules of the chess pieces.

  • @alexcarter8807
    @alexcarter8807 3 роки тому +257

    It's amazing how well those veterans have aged. They all look about 20 years younger than they have to be.

    • @tmadera415
      @tmadera415 3 роки тому +6

      When was this made?

    • @AG-GA
      @AG-GA 3 роки тому +22

      They are Mao's soldier! Long Live Chairman Mao! Long Live our heros! Veterans never dies. Salute 敬礼!

    • @rambo8wradio
      @rambo8wradio 3 роки тому +21

      Asians age differently..

    • @williamkirkham7357
      @williamkirkham7357 3 роки тому +10

      This film is at least eight years old.

    • @joeblowfromidaho3642
      @joeblowfromidaho3642 2 роки тому +16

      @@AG-GA He killed 40 million Chinese, jackass

  • @rogerlee1941
    @rogerlee1941 2 роки тому +105

    My grandparents grew up during the Great Leap Forward Movement, and grandpa would tell us stories of those times when he and his family had little to no food on the table and use these stories to teach us not to waste food.

    • @hectorviramontes7836
      @hectorviramontes7836 2 роки тому +22

      It teaches how horrible Communism was, and still is.

    • @kingmelo2877
      @kingmelo2877 2 роки тому +14

      @@hectorviramontes7836 bruh go learn some history man.

    • @altaccaltacc7652
      @altaccaltacc7652 2 роки тому +9

      @@hectorviramontes7836 if we are talking about where famine happened, it litterally happened everywhere. even in a democratic free nation.

    • @kingmelo2877
      @kingmelo2877 2 роки тому +1

      @Haung Jo where??? dude you really need to stop this whole paranoia.

    • @gwho
      @gwho 2 роки тому +4

      too bad. it should have veen taught to not endorse communism.

  • @JC-fy8wh
    @JC-fy8wh 4 роки тому +22

    Thank you for uploading such a great video. I can't believe there was so much into sino-soviet split that I didnt know before

  • @antoniolaureano7148
    @antoniolaureano7148 4 роки тому +264

    Great leap backwards- Kruschev

    • @maxschon7709
      @maxschon7709 4 роки тому +17

      Under Chrushow the failures of the Stalin era become obvious. He wasn't long enough leader to make too many mistakes anyway. Breshnev was much longer in Power.

    • @johnchristiancanda3320
      @johnchristiancanda3320 4 роки тому +8

      Khrushchev and Mao were both ex-Trotskyites.

    • @PMMagro
      @PMMagro 3 роки тому +2

      Apart from Gorbachev the most realistic off theeese leaders...

    • @Player_Review
      @Player_Review 3 роки тому +12

      38 million lives lost was just a normal and natural cost of achieving a Utopia though, per Socialism's notion for sacrifice of the individual for the 'greater good'.

    • @jant.carlsson5061
      @jant.carlsson5061 3 роки тому +2

      A leap backward? Yes, perhaps for those who would like to see a Russia without Russians.

  • @keithyostin4482
    @keithyostin4482 3 роки тому +70

    I get the sense that this documentary incorrectly portrays many domestic Chinese policies as being inspired by the Sino-Soviet rivalry, when it seems to me that they had their own domestic origins and motivations.

    • @TheBillaro
      @TheBillaro 2 роки тому +3

      ya think

    • @coimbralaw
      @coimbralaw 2 роки тому

      Okay rando

    • @peterchung2262
      @peterchung2262 Рік тому +5

      Because this documentary focuses on the influence the Sino-Soviet split had on those policies, of course Mao Zedong has his own reasons for how he ruled but this documentary is ultimately not about Chinese domestic policy but the Sino-Soviet tensions.

  • @alnam1194
    @alnam1194 Рік тому +15

    Excellent presentation. Very appropriate narration: voice, intonation. Clear and cohesive flow, that doesn't bore the audience.

  • @frederikj5754
    @frederikj5754 4 роки тому +246

    So much for the so called “Unbreakable Alliance”.

    • @tony3003001
      @tony3003001 4 роки тому +47

      There is no forever alliance/enemies, only profits to be made.

    • @GunGreenGo
      @GunGreenGo 4 роки тому +46

      its funny how today so many people think that china and russia are best friends...

    • @jonyw8851
      @jonyw8851 4 роки тому +10

      ussr even killed themselves, heavy corrupted inside. and even ask territory from ally

    • @DDRmails
      @DDRmails 4 роки тому +3

      @@GunGreenGo most important that theyr public think so... that enought

    • @klm2639
      @klm2639 4 роки тому +16

      Are you just finding out about the Sino Soviet split? Many communist nations resisted Soviet dominance, Yugoslavia and Albania being the most prominent in Europe

  • @celticman1909
    @celticman1909 4 роки тому +241

    Guess this explains how Nixon cozied up to the Chinese in 1972 and went over there for a big photo op when we had troops in Vietnam fighting the Soviet backed North Vietnamese.

    • @jimedgcomb4597
      @jimedgcomb4597 4 роки тому +28

      It was China (Zou Enlai) who forced Ho Chi Mihn to accept the UN's terms on N.Vietnam to end the fighting with the French after 1954... But by the time of Nixon's visit to China, we had already committed to a policy of withdrawal...

    • @xz1891
      @xz1891 4 роки тому +10

      @@jimedgcomb4597 but you need a decent exit

    • @charlesramirez587
      @charlesramirez587 4 роки тому +40

      @@travishu6613 And that later China invaded vietnam as well and lost...

    • @axelNodvon2047
      @axelNodvon2047 4 роки тому +6

      Charles Ramirez Cuz their best troops were in the soviet border

    • @4priusnt
      @4priusnt 3 роки тому +8

      Nixon should have let Mao and Breznef sort the dispute out ... both countries had thug leadership and all Nixon did was allow the China CCP brutal atheist evil to the core regime to get more control and power

  • @adamfrazer5150
    @adamfrazer5150 3 роки тому +102

    One of the sweetest moments is finding another piece of history I didn't know much about - surprised at myself actually :)

    • @milli2901
      @milli2901 2 роки тому +3

      Same man I’m pretty well rounded on history especially Cold War antics, this one slipped under the radar

    • @Clayton.Bigsby.360
      @Clayton.Bigsby.360 2 роки тому +2

      Of course they don't teach you this in the West, Because if they teach you this, then you will make the connection that the nazis were socialist as well, even though they attacked the Communist and socialist in Germany, This is one of the left's favorite arguments, But people of the same ideology and religion often war with each other. This is why you Americans so readily believed Jussie Smollet, no questions asked!! Bahahahah

    • @peggyfranzen6159
      @peggyfranzen6159 2 роки тому +2

      Machiavellian ." The Prince", should be read @ this point.

    • @christopherc.9995
      @christopherc.9995 Рік тому

      Yet within different ideologies, history has distinct interpretations and even different "facts".

    • @explorerofunknownworlddept6232
      @explorerofunknownworlddept6232 Рік тому

      @@christopherc.9995 The most true parts in this doc. were the one scholar who spoke Chinese, and 2 other veterans. As other so-called scholars, who seemed "Manchurian Candidates" in part. You can tell from their chosen terms and hesitated impressions, seemed they were trying to fit into the "political correctness" rather the true facts.truths.

  • @anfrankogezamartincic1161
    @anfrankogezamartincic1161 3 роки тому +10

    100 documentaries are not enough to picture Chinas history. Never a dull moment in China

  • @rednek666
    @rednek666 4 роки тому +26

    Great footage! Never seen that one before

  • @pimpinaintdeadho
    @pimpinaintdeadho 4 роки тому +4

    Great documentary. Thanks for the upload!

  • @skyqueen1148
    @skyqueen1148 3 роки тому +14

    Thank you for the documentary. Wish I had learned this in high School.

  • @KennyMcCormick99
    @KennyMcCormick99 3 роки тому +10

    This was awesome!!

  • @BobWilliam
    @BobWilliam 3 роки тому +67

    Geopolitics is a very very weird science.

    • @Clayton.Bigsby.360
      @Clayton.Bigsby.360 2 роки тому +3

      Of course they don't teach you this in the West, Because if they teach you this, then you will make the connection that the nazis were socialist as well, even though they attacked the Communist and socialist in Germany, This is one of the left's favorite arguments, But people of the same ideology and religion often war with each other. This is why you Americans so readily believed Jussie Smollet, no questions asked!! Bahahahah

    • @dustywaxhead
      @dustywaxhead 2 роки тому

      @@Clayton.Bigsby.360 The Fascists were Socialists but not leftists, they advocated for the return of traditional values, community, and of course Nationalism. American conservatives are just classical liberals who champion individualism which leads to degeneracy and rootlessness

    • @Clayton.Bigsby.360
      @Clayton.Bigsby.360 2 роки тому

      @@dustywaxhead
      The Nazis took control of national media, film industry, national industry, national health care, nationalized education, nationalized housing, nationalized transportation and railway services, the Sciences and technology...HMMMMM, who does this sound like in your America? Definitely not the right. On top of that, that Nazis were the "stylish" and "the in crowd," they listened to the most popular music, were considered the most highly educated, the most Science based people and the elite class and most sophisticated!! Who does this sound like to you in your America?

    • @Clayton.Bigsby.360
      @Clayton.Bigsby.360 2 роки тому

      @@dustywaxhead
      Your American right is considered the least educated, the least science based, the least sophisticated, they are made fun of by the elite upper class and by the national legacy media and Hollywood and television and social media!!

    • @Clayton.Bigsby.360
      @Clayton.Bigsby.360 2 роки тому

      @@dustywaxhead
      That would make your American DEMOCRAT party leftist the bourgeoisie and the right the proletariat, am I right comrade?

  • @thacholiothenan4229
    @thacholiothenan4229 4 роки тому +10

    This is a very informative and interesting documentary. Thanks.

  • @antoniowang3392
    @antoniowang3392 3 роки тому +50

    China:send troops
    Soviets:send Tanks and artillery
    China :capture soviet tank
    Soviets:send NUCLEAR BOMB CHINA: Send US

    • @Dweller415
      @Dweller415 3 роки тому +3

      The Soviets were close (as you point out) to using nuclear weapons against the Chinese.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 3 роки тому +5

      @@Dweller415 yes, US said NO, so soviet quit

    • @robertblomberg1863
      @robertblomberg1863 2 роки тому +1

      1969 china already have 2nd generation nuclear bomb

  • @EDX2308
    @EDX2308 2 роки тому +107

    My grandmother (93 years old) (from Taishan region) told me how they and the village and everyone they knew had to sell everything they had (the rice, the livestock and anything agriculture related) to pay off the Soviet Union. This story was told to me a long time ago until I encountered another lady (now in her 60's) when I told her the same story she said it was true except it happened when she was a little girl and didn't know what was going on. It's only recently that this was a massive export to paying off the USSR's debt because the interest was too high to keep maintaining...

    • @marcteenhc9793
      @marcteenhc9793 2 роки тому +2

      That is what propaganda does in third world countries...poor, ignorant people believe anything.

    • @rolandjosef7961
      @rolandjosef7961 2 роки тому

      A Socialist state using Capitalism on another Socialist state.

    • @edwardpi9852
      @edwardpi9852 2 роки тому +2

      Yes, Russia was never China's friend. Russians has been enemies with Qing Dyansty since 1650. If people only learned their true history.

    • @MG-hg1sq
      @MG-hg1sq 2 роки тому +4

      does she believe the gospel of jesus christ to get the gift of enternal life from god ?

    • @EDX2308
      @EDX2308 2 роки тому +5

      @@MG-hg1sq She is Buddhist. Also religion was banned for a time.

  • @JeffreyBarkdull
    @JeffreyBarkdull 3 роки тому +28

    The Bigger the Empire, the higher the chances of Internal Conflict

  • @Baamthe25th
    @Baamthe25th 4 роки тому +218

    I didn't know that the Soviet seriously considered the Nuclear Option
    History could have changed quite a lot then

    • @jono601
      @jono601 4 роки тому +23

      Yep. My dad said there were tons and tons of abandoned underground bunkers that he would play in as a kid. There were a lot of tunnels dug preparing for the nuclear strike.

    • @anzietakamatsu1805
      @anzietakamatsu1805 4 роки тому +11

      Jing Cai Han we still have tons or these everywhere

    • @adilkabyltaev7401
      @adilkabyltaev7401 4 роки тому +15

      Ahaha, and the US is the only country seriously used nuclear weapons against civilians

    • @jayr2188
      @jayr2188 4 роки тому +13

      @@adilkabyltaev7401 Make America great again!

    • @TheKulteska
      @TheKulteska 4 роки тому +3

      @Sultan of Sieg what are you on about, mlrs rocket systems are nothing new, they just used them in the standard procedure for an area supression weapon as they have been used since like the 12th century.

  • @mikess56
    @mikess56 3 роки тому +3

    The best info on the split I can find anywhere online, so clear and concise with specific data as to the beginning and worsening of relations, thank you for this

  • @ileegian147
    @ileegian147 2 роки тому +7

    First time I have ever heard about this history. Excellent!

  • @hqiu6828
    @hqiu6828 4 роки тому +43

    I still remember those underground bunkers in the city for nuclear war. The new generation in China probably forgets those events. This video is a very informative and interesting documentary to teach them about history.

    • @williamyoung9401
      @williamyoung9401 2 роки тому

      Too bad the Chinese didn't know about radiation...those bunkers wouldn't have saved anyone... And imagine those tanks rolling into the new radioactive wasteland? They'd last about a week. Not to mention the cat holes, lol... It was just to give the powerless something to do so they didn't actually have to think.

    • @silentwatcher1455
      @silentwatcher1455 2 роки тому +2

      @@williamyoung9401 you are wrong. They knew about radiation and how to protect themselves.

    • @Julia-rk3ls
      @Julia-rk3ls Рік тому +3

      The new generation in China know what happened those years,chinese love history they learn from history

    • @karthur3421
      @karthur3421 Рік тому

      @@williamyoung9401 ​about the same as American cold war propaganda leaflets telling people to hide inside their lead lined fridge because it'll protect them from nuclear bombs xD
      It's all about giving hope to the people however slim it may be.

  • @grapeshot
    @grapeshot 4 роки тому +166

    Seeing what's going on between China and India I see the relevance of this documentary.

    • @abohnad
      @abohnad 4 роки тому +17

      what is the relevance ? India was and is not a communist country not even China frankly is not at the same degree of communism as it used to be.

    • @navinkumarpk86
      @navinkumarpk86 4 роки тому +36

      @@abohnad The CCP's use of propaganda and feigning innocence is the standard playbook till today.

    • @TheLoyalOfficer
      @TheLoyalOfficer 4 роки тому +6

      Exactly! I thought the exact same thing.

    • @TheLoyalOfficer
      @TheLoyalOfficer 4 роки тому +5

      @@abohnad Look at it from a military perspective though. Border disputes spiraling out of control...?

    • @abohnad
      @abohnad 4 роки тому +9

      @@TheLoyalOfficer This happens all the time. especially for post colonial world. Iraq/Kuwait Pakistan/India China/Tiwan Palastain/Israel Egypt/Sudan etc

  • @moefinesse9878
    @moefinesse9878 2 роки тому +14

    that was an excellent documentary. i knew of the tension between the Soviets and China, but this was insightful

  • @ab9840
    @ab9840 2 роки тому +11

    In the end, China got ownership of Zhenbao island. They also got ownership of Tielieketi after signing a border treaty with Kazikhstan.

  • @carlosmenz2083
    @carlosmenz2083 3 роки тому +18

    I had no knowledge of this incident, i was so intrigued by this docu. thanks.

  • @harbin88
    @harbin88 4 роки тому +175

    The video is an excllent summary and insights of Sino Soviet relations during those years. I lived throught them and can confirm some of the events talked about here. I really appreciated this video. But I want to point out that some of the footages within the video are mixed up with time. Some of the footage about the three year famine with big crowds are clearly footages of China before 1949 (the year Mao took China) and some of them are even old footages that Chinese fighting with Japanese during WWII.

    • @willsaint8871
      @willsaint8871 3 роки тому +11

      @Touhidul Islam Abir Still better than most documentaries about cold war(about history generally) on UA-cam. MOst of others had tons of bias, careless mistakes, baseless speculations and naive stories regradless of their affection for any faction.

    • @destubae3271
      @destubae3271 2 роки тому +7

      Timeline uploads have been known to use unfitting clips. They used Wehrmacht footage for a ww1 video once

    • @TheBillaro
      @TheBillaro 2 роки тому +1

      where were you at the time?

    • @harbin88
      @harbin88 2 роки тому +6

      @@TheBillaro I was in China in elementary school. But I still remember all those boarder conflicts and we had to prepare for war.

    • @ikudosen1188
      @ikudosen1188 Рік тому

      But people died rite?

  • @luckycharm1
    @luckycharm1 2 роки тому +16

    Interesting. US saved China from being nuked. Also, I didn’t know this tension occurred during the height of the Vietnam war. Damn, how the world would have changed.

    • @mikeyetman8407
      @mikeyetman8407 2 роки тому +1

      Why would they

    • @eternalobi
      @eternalobi 2 роки тому +1

      Saved the world. If Soviet could use it against China, they could use it against America or anyone else. At least America used nukes to end WW2, Soviet is trying to use it to end a border conflict?

    • @williamwan3712
      @williamwan3712 Рік тому +2

      @@mikeyetman8407 "My enemy's enemy will be my friend"

    • @lvjinbin28
      @lvjinbin28 Рік тому +2

      soviet also saved china in korean war from american nuke threat,
      but soviet and china both supported vietcong against usa before 1972

    • @LEE-qv6kv
      @LEE-qv6kv 9 місяців тому

      In fact, the U.S. has made four nuclear threats against China.

  • @eggheadegghead
    @eggheadegghead 2 роки тому +35

    Throughout human history, friends became foes, enemies became friends…….it never changes.

    • @davidkugel
      @davidkugel 2 роки тому +12

      There are no permanent allies only permanent national interests. I remember a sci-fi movie where an American sailor from WW2 is transported to the 1980s. He is shocked to learn that Japan and Germany are now US allies and that Russia and China are US enemies.

    • @ottomanpapyrus9365
      @ottomanpapyrus9365 Рік тому

      shifts*...

    • @ChloeKruegerSenpai
      @ChloeKruegerSenpai Рік тому +1

      @@davidkugel Allies in WWII has disagreement between their Ideology, about Capitalist and Communist.

    • @thomasdonovan3580
      @thomasdonovan3580 Рік тому +1

      "we have no permanent friends or permanent enemies only our interests are permanent."
      -PM Gladstone

    • @j.dunlop8295
      @j.dunlop8295 9 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely, after WW1, the British expected that their next war would be with America! Literally planning on it!

  • @watercutterlan1401
    @watercutterlan1401 3 роки тому +74

    Soviet uninon‘s biggest mistake is involving cold war with China and USA at the same time

    • @johnroberts8233
      @johnroberts8233 3 роки тому +29

      Fighting on two fronts is never a good idea.

    • @lettuceman9439
      @lettuceman9439 3 роки тому +9

      However sino-soviet split were mainly due to the soviet wanting a reluctant co-existence over the west and further mistakes with the great leap forward and the cultural revolution disgusted the soviet union.

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha 3 роки тому +1

      correction: USSR adding another one on the current menu

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha 3 роки тому +12

      @@lettuceman9439 Krushev (or whoever this guy) is just a bitter person who have extreme hate against Stalin. probably Stalin bullied Krushev during their school lol

    • @lettuceman9439
      @lettuceman9439 3 роки тому +3

      @@leexingha what?

  • @elfrad1714
    @elfrad1714 4 роки тому +238

    It would have been nice to have more of the Soviet perspective.

    • @maxschon7709
      @maxschon7709 4 роки тому +11

      Why? The soviet is gone - and PRC still is in Beijing, so they butter up the history for them.

    • @madtntfreak360
      @madtntfreak360 4 роки тому +46

      @@maxschon7709 just because the nations gone doesn't mean its previous citizens are

    • @kidpeligro7878
      @kidpeligro7878 4 роки тому +7

      There is also an old Cold War documentary series where an episode touched this topic.
      Try to look up in YT "Cold War China (1949-1972)" its episode 15 of a 24 episode series I believe
      That at least provide perspective to both ends

    • @francismuiruri9064
      @francismuiruri9064 3 роки тому +7

      Very true this is as one sided as they come.

    • @Ktaurus26
      @Ktaurus26 3 роки тому +20

      Max Schön people from the Soviet Union didn’t disappear into thin air lol. Russian Federation is the successor state and the kremlin can look back at what happened through its archives.

  • @mannyespinola
    @mannyespinola 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this video

  • @jeffwindrim975
    @jeffwindrim975 2 роки тому +6

    Thank you for sharing this video it’s rare to see inside China during this time period. I would be interested in seeing more videos like this.

  • @teresabaker-carl9668
    @teresabaker-carl9668 4 роки тому +35

    I never knew quite so much about this relationship before. Fascinating! Thank you for putting this out, and I look forward to more such informative programming.

  • @antonvernooy6186
    @antonvernooy6186 3 роки тому +3

    I haven't watched a video yet but I really am excited to learn about this

  • @GODFIRST89710AMEN
    @GODFIRST89710AMEN Рік тому +2

    Thanks!

  • @drinkteanow
    @drinkteanow 2 роки тому +12

    When Soviet and China at war.
    Mongolia: Man, this is a great movie to watch

    • @ab9840
      @ab9840 2 роки тому +2

      Mongolia was actually pro-Soviet. After all, if were not for Soviet help early on China would have annexed all of Mongolia.

  • @hannibalcosta
    @hannibalcosta 3 роки тому +14

    An absurd conflict born of the total lack of diplomacy on both sides.

  • @mikeylejan8849
    @mikeylejan8849 3 роки тому +47

    The Bear and the Dragon!

    • @rytiskurcinskas7179
      @rytiskurcinskas7179 3 роки тому +3

      expect dragons dont exist ;)

    • @_____Z_____
      @_____Z_____ 3 роки тому +2

      China is strong

    • @Kiraaa92
      @Kiraaa92 3 роки тому +5

      @@_____Z_____ don't even start.

    • @JW-xr9kb
      @JW-xr9kb 3 роки тому

      no. it should be evil bear and adorable panda

    • @Kiraaa92
      @Kiraaa92 3 роки тому

      ​@ネイビーシールズ jealous of what ? :)

  • @chuchiyang7031
    @chuchiyang7031 2 роки тому +2

    Wow!!! This history didn’t exist to me until today. Mind blowing

  • @abogadocarlosmorthera
    @abogadocarlosmorthera Рік тому +1

    Excellent documentary. Many thanks! Greetings from Cancún, México 🇲🇽

  • @rosiebook5207
    @rosiebook5207 2 роки тому +20

    We all learnt about the cold war at school but I think the Sino-Soviet split only got a footnote. I did not know that China got involved in the Korean war because Stalin asked them to, or that there was actual fighting between China and the Soviets.

  • @steveharvey6421
    @steveharvey6421 4 роки тому +10

    I remember as a kid in sixth grade hearing about this on the news. Of course we did not have a grasp on what was really going on.

  • @lordcolinb
    @lordcolinb Рік тому

    Amazing, thank you

  • @paulmotheral9616
    @paulmotheral9616 9 місяців тому +1

    The fight over that tank. For it to sink beneath the ice and raise that thing up from below is wild to me; all under shelling. Great and Informative.

  • @learn6036
    @learn6036 4 роки тому +30

    It’s all about who control the land, sea and air, on this planet call earth.

  • @richardtucker8382
    @richardtucker8382 2 роки тому +3

    This is crazy. I graduated high school in 1969. I was on to worrying about the Cuban-missle crisis but I never heard anything about a shooting war between China and the Soviet Union. Crazy.

  • @user-fq7lj8fe9y
    @user-fq7lj8fe9y 5 місяців тому +1

    This was a great documentary, and I never heard of the skirmishes on the China-USSR border. This was very well produced. Thank you.

  • @joeshulman675
    @joeshulman675 2 роки тому +1

    One of the best documentary s I have ever seen !!!@

  • @ericgilbert56
    @ericgilbert56 3 роки тому +5

    Now this is a story I wanted to hear.

  • @tansent
    @tansent 4 роки тому +11

    Back in the 1950s. When the USA and USSR thought they have nukes, massive and comprehensive military advantage against China. But in Korea peninsula and Zhenbao island, the reality says otherwise.

    • @khalee95
      @khalee95 4 роки тому +2

      In Korea, General MacArthur wanted and proposed a nuclear strike, but the president denied the option and fired MacArthur after that.

    • @bosanski_Cevap
      @bosanski_Cevap 3 роки тому +4

      Chinese had 2million troops and lost between 180.000-900.000 troops while americans lost 36.000 soldiers. For every american, china lost 25 soldiers.
      I ain't a mathematician but this clearly shows how effective the chinese peasant "army" was.

    • @seanzhang7087
      @seanzhang7087 2 роки тому +9

      @@bosanski_Cevap China was not fighting with America only, it was fighting with the UN. Go look up Koreans and UN soldiers died during the war. I guess the combined ratio would be no more than 2:1. Especially when UN soldiers had superior weapons, artillery support, food, and air covers.

    • @bosanski_Cevap
      @bosanski_Cevap 2 роки тому +2

      @@seanzhang7087 the combined casualties from the allies are 170k of which majority are koreans (137k)
      Chinese casualties are between 100k-400k and north koreans 215k-400k
      Chinese govnerment says 100k which I will not trust duo it being an authoritarian communist govnerment.
      A 2:1 ratio seems pretty realistic but I personally would say 3:1ratio
      Like you said, americans and UN forces had far superior fire power and support while the chinese were mostly infantry.
      Americans and most UN casualties were caused by the chinese army duo the north korean army being mostly obliterated in the 2nd phase of the war.
      The most realistic chinese casualties estimation would be ~200k-250k
      That's a realistic number

    • @sprrt3675
      @sprrt3675 2 роки тому

      @@bosanski_Cevap There was a huge technological gap between both sides by the time.Amount of Chinese soldiers died by freezing cause they didn’t have anything to keep warm.But they finally achieved their mission.These soldiers just put their strategic purpose above the causalities.This war brought China a continuous Soviet aid which accelerate the modernization.

  • @astrataway7077
    @astrataway7077 3 роки тому +2

    27:45 Professor Lee. The hilarity of that situation is astounding

  • @user-xy5pi5sp5v
    @user-xy5pi5sp5v 3 роки тому +12

    Hope you guys make a video of sino Vietnamese war too.

  • @shadowpresident4203
    @shadowpresident4203 3 роки тому +46

    If the USSR and PRC had somehow managed to patch up their differences, a strong partnership between the two as a unified 'communist' bloc would have been an absolute behemoth on the world stage. China brings to the table a huge population, economic potential, and warm-water ports. The USSR also had a large population (ranked #3 in the world at the time I believe, ahead of the US at #4) absolutely massive geography, natural resources (oil and gas especially), industrial capacity, and military technology. Combined, they would have given anybody else a run for their money, economically and militarily speaking.

    • @monsieurshade4104
      @monsieurshade4104 3 роки тому +25

      Unfortunatelly, their leaders were delusional and selfish.

    • @danrooc
      @danrooc 3 роки тому +12

      Just in theory. A long term unified 'empire' like that would not be likely, not at the time nor under the existing leaderships. It simply would have been too unbalanced and stretching too far, almost from Berlin to Hong Kong and from the Himalayas to the Artic, holding dozens if not hundreds of ethnicities, languages and a lot of internal tensions of their own. A United Arab nations, or United Sub-Saharian Africa or even a United Latin America would be more likely concepts... and definitely those won't be the cases for many years to come, if ever.

    • @PolishBehemoth
      @PolishBehemoth 3 роки тому +12

      You dont get it. That was impossible. The soveit union. Was bent on global domination. Reagan was right. Habing another nation do better than ussr was not allowable. Ussr was evil.

    • @imorichwu4797
      @imorichwu4797 3 роки тому +4

      But China has 800 millions people, if union with soviet, will become a China country. i don't think soviet will agree

    • @joshlewis575
      @joshlewis575 2 роки тому +2

      @@monsieurshade4104 oh yes so unfortunate, did u not see how these people lived? Looks so awesome huh, how are people such goofs

  • @Zyzyx442
    @Zyzyx442 Рік тому

    Thanks for this documentary, so much I don't know.

  • @rohinamacanmarkar9847
    @rohinamacanmarkar9847 Рік тому +1

    Thank you all this History of the Sino Russian wars I have learned so much ....

  • @sinsun9166
    @sinsun9166 4 роки тому +12

    Take a look at how Russia became the Soviet Union and how China changed from the Qing Dynasty to the People’s Republic of China.
    You will know these two countries can share the troubles but not the riches.
    The Soviet Union no longer exists, but Mao’s Communist Party still exists. I’m really curious how the Soviet Union created a system let system leader hate each other,

    • @ElevatedSoul33
      @ElevatedSoul33 2 роки тому

      Soviet Union still lives in within China (CCP) Putin and XJP will bring it back … only matter of time

  • @goldeq8521
    @goldeq8521 3 роки тому +26

    A great piece of history. Before the revolution from Imperialism 1911, The Father of Modern Democrtic China the First Chinese president Sun Yet-sen Who was teacher of both Moa Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek. President Sun constructed the first Chinese Consitution even when he was very sick. It was the 3 people (citizens) principle China still live by.. There were more people die of hunger before 1911 and carried on to 1949 due to the country's weakness and corruption.
    The one thing Moa did very well and never got even mentioned, was he put women's equal right into the Chinese Constitution in 1949 when he just found the Communist China. Please notice in this video there were almost as many female soldiers in the front line as the male soldiers. I realized that was why when I saw PBS news last month regarding the sexual assault in the US military became a crisis, my tears came down for a long time. I was born in 1949 in HongKong a British Colony, my late God-father was a soldier. I heard a lot of stories about the war. A good leader's Vision is to guide his followers into 100 years' plan. Until today China is still the only one in Asia that have women's equal rights in their Constitution. The other 8 countries in the west are Belgium,Canada, Denmark, France, Latvia, Luxembourg, Iceland and Sweden. It is very important for the human race, If the mother of the next generation hurting while bearing them. When will be the quality of the next generation?

    • @xuyahfish
      @xuyahfish 2 роки тому +1

      Theoretically there is political equality, but in practice there is not. What is the percentage of women CEOs? Percentage of women in high places of political power? What about the silenc8ng of women who have claimed secual harassment or assault from male figures of power? From my experience living in China, among the common people 老百姓 there is a fair amount of equality, but among the bosses? Not at all. Also, I had a friend who's husband was a drinker & gambler & lazy & she was bullied by her Mother-in-law, forced to do all household chores & give her wages over.

    • @user-on7xm3dr5z
      @user-on7xm3dr5z Рік тому +1

      @@xuyahfish Equality is not equal to average

  • @FederalBureauofInvestigation24
    @FederalBureauofInvestigation24 2 роки тому +1

    This is so cool and interesting

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 3 роки тому +8

    Minor unstated detail around 10:00: Mao's son was killed in that Chinese troop movement into Korea, something which probably didn't help Mao's love for the Russians much.

  • @andymorfitis
    @andymorfitis 3 роки тому +3

    I knew nothing much about india/Soviet conflicts with China..
    Thank you 'poster' 👍😉

  • @chenjiahui6799
    @chenjiahui6799 3 роки тому +33

    Great leap..
    Into graves...

    • @frozzytango9927
      @frozzytango9927 3 роки тому +6

      Gorbachev told Mao: "You crazy delusional idiot"

    • @anthonytran7566
      @anthonytran7566 3 роки тому +2

      @@frozzytango9927 Very delusional indeed!!!

  • @user-yt9ns5bt5k
    @user-yt9ns5bt5k 3 роки тому

    Very nice video

  • @alfaeco15
    @alfaeco15 3 роки тому +70

    "We got rid of Stalin, you should get rid of Mao". My though too.

    • @sherkjlsjdf6334
      @sherkjlsjdf6334 3 роки тому +9

      mao is a great man ,we always respect him in china

    • @alfaeco15
      @alfaeco15 3 роки тому

      @@sherkjlsjdf6334 was

    • @thebasedspectre3048
      @thebasedspectre3048 3 роки тому +11

      @@alfaeco15 isn't and never was

    • @Herman47
      @Herman47 3 роки тому +7

      @@sherkjlsjdf6334 You love the Great Leap Backward?

    • @sherkjlsjdf6334
      @sherkjlsjdf6334 3 роки тому +2

      @@Herman47 we should get rid of evil satan washinton

  • @cossacktwofive4974
    @cossacktwofive4974 3 роки тому +15

    "Chinese protester being crushed by Soviet tanks."
    "Chinese fisherman being harassed."
    These remind me of something...

  • @centrist1008
    @centrist1008 4 роки тому +9

    Finally something interesting

  • @bw5360
    @bw5360 2 роки тому +5

    It is quite misleading. All the video clips used to show China's 3 year's famine were taken in old China, before Mao' s time. They were from KMT time in 1930s or 1940s

  • @manipulatortrash
    @manipulatortrash 2 роки тому +2

    "The great leap down a cliff" sounds more fitting than "the great leap forward"

  • @dunkelmonkey
    @dunkelmonkey 4 роки тому +16

    I'm not a fan of Nixon and Kissinger, but they understood the rift between the USSR and China, and played the two nations against each other to give the United States an advantage over both.

    • @ALCRAN2010
      @ALCRAN2010 4 роки тому +2

      What's your observation on today's state of affairs between the three?

    • @emsnewssupkis6453
      @emsnewssupkis6453 4 роки тому +12

      My father was doing diplomacy between the US and China back then, he was the second diplomat to go to China after Nixon's visit. He got in a fight with Mad Madame Mao over the fact that my parent's beds were bolted to the floor. There were NO double beds allowed in China back then! My father tried to move the beds together but they were BOLTED to the floor! So he asked Madame Mao to have someone unbolt them. She said, (I am not joking)' Nixon didn't complain!' My father said, 'Unlike Nixon, I love my wife.' This infuriated her but Mao thought it was funny.

    • @dunkelmonkey
      @dunkelmonkey 4 роки тому

      @@emsnewssupkis6453 that's a great story, thanks for sharing it!

    • @loyaldude10
      @loyaldude10 4 роки тому +2

      Nixon and Kissinger were absolutely brilliant on foreign policy. With the exception of Vietnam

    • @axelpatrickb.pingol3228
      @axelpatrickb.pingol3228 4 роки тому

      @@loyaldude10 The Vietnamization? That shouldn't be America's war, it's South Vietnam's. If they can't fight for their own existence, better pull the plug on them and haggle with the victorious Commie government instead. At least Ho and friends are far more understanding than other Commie leaders like Hoxha and Ceausescu...

  • @Budding8660
    @Budding8660 3 роки тому +8

    The accent of these old soldiers matches the battle ground area.

  • @ruisamuel1746
    @ruisamuel1746 8 місяців тому

    it's gorgeous documentary

  • @ermiasd2695
    @ermiasd2695 2 роки тому +33

    Eye opening! Never knew there was an acrimony between soviets and China, let alone one that led to border war and brink of nuclear Holocaust.
    I can also see how mao forged china’s new found sense of national pride and place in the world ( albeit at the cruel price of disastrous policies). I’m indebted to this insight. Thank you

    • @xiangpan3407
      @xiangpan3407 2 роки тому +3

      Mao had a plan, once mainland got nuclear bombed, all the Chinese abandon home and move to Sybria.

    • @LarzGustafsson
      @LarzGustafsson 9 місяців тому

      The USSR started it all.

  • @bobburger6485
    @bobburger6485 4 роки тому +22

    Man moa was crazy, the soviets where the most cautious empirw on earth

    • @maxschon7709
      @maxschon7709 4 роки тому +4

      If you listen carfully you notice Mao only broke with the Soviet union after Chrushtow broke with Stalin - which every historian says it was one of the best action he did while was leader of the USSR. Mao wanted to have same status like Stalin so he risked a war.

    • @SHAD0WB0LT
      @SHAD0WB0LT 4 роки тому +15

      ​@Garrison Nichols The Soviets were indeed the most sneaky empire on earth. The Nazis were very blunt in their propaganda. The Soviets disguised Russian supremacy, colonialism, genocide, occupation, establishment of puppet regimes that brainwashed the populations they ruled to worship Stalin, and war under the cloak of "building socialism," and being the leader of the "Communist world revolution." They were a very sneaky empire. They disguised the new Russian empire under the cloak of being a "union" of socialist nations.

    • @theenemyofthearrogant4784
      @theenemyofthearrogant4784 3 роки тому

      It's true at least partly.

    • @MMGtheSERBIANqyqypoa
      @MMGtheSERBIANqyqypoa 3 роки тому +1

      @@SHAD0WB0LT they're torturing refugees in ft hood texas concentration camps

    • @TomsVlogs5166
      @TomsVlogs5166 2 роки тому

      @@MMGtheSERBIANqyqypoa evidence?

  • @scottweaverphotovideo
    @scottweaverphotovideo 4 роки тому +18

    Fascinating history. I did not know about the border war.

    • @TedBronson1918
      @TedBronson1918 4 роки тому +6

      Most history classes teach the broad stokes. You have to take college level classes or read books to learn more in details. (include review archived film, video). You have to remember that every subject is taught at age appropriate levels. They don't lay detente on kids who barely know what a pilgrim is, and they'll hardly mention this border war to people who barely understand what the Cold War was about - they're confused enough already. This is a mere side-note, a flare-up.

  • @hzhang4243
    @hzhang4243 2 роки тому +42

    Mao as a grass-rooted revolutionist, educated himself through the Chinese history and wisdom, his plain philosophy is to gain true independence at all cost, he managed to bargain adequately from Stalin to return few Russian occupied military bases, but on the ally end, he has been always very skeptical and in a balanced view from nowadays, it was too blunt and aggressive to deal with Russian relationship and associated Chinese domestic development.

    • @user-pf3kv4bv5s
      @user-pf3kv4bv5s 2 роки тому +9

      If Mao started to deal with Khrushchev, then he too would become a revisionist.
      But Mao acted like a real communist and condemned Khrushchev's revisionism.

    • @hurteachothermacon9037
      @hurteachothermacon9037 Рік тому +7

      You are too naive to think that Mao Zedong and other leaders of the first generation of China have come out of countless deaths. The environment and experience they grew up in just told him that everything must be a life-and-death battle. All our experiences and the logic of thinking about problems are different now than they were back then, and all the environments are different.

  • @iVerse2043
    @iVerse2043 Рік тому

    Finally, this was brought up on youtube

  • @erikrungemadsen2081
    @erikrungemadsen2081 3 роки тому +12

    Ahh the "secret speech" denouncing Stalins crimes. Never knew it had consequences outside the USSR.

    • @Player_Review
      @Player_Review 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, though obviously to a much lesser extent, but it would be somewhat a tradition from then to denounce somewhat predecessor's implementations of government and why they failed to achieve Communism during their time and why it would be achieved or moved toward more during their time in power.

  • @beardedcanadian2190
    @beardedcanadian2190 4 роки тому +6

    From 9:00-9:26 you can hear lines from Stronghold Legends music

  • @DrN007
    @DrN007 Рік тому +2

    Never knew of such a recent mini-war between the two!

  • @SuperHyee
    @SuperHyee 2 роки тому

    Magnificent !

  • @chunjiang3514
    @chunjiang3514 3 роки тому +5

    If there was a Fallout game set in China/Soviet Union in the scenario the Soviet-Sino relations soured towards war it would be interesting

  • @joegagnon2268
    @joegagnon2268 3 роки тому +9

    That poor boy dropped the vase of flowers his whole family

  • @charleyarchuleta4932
    @charleyarchuleta4932 2 роки тому +1

    Great documentary

    • @charleyarchuleta4932
      @charleyarchuleta4932 2 роки тому

      Interesting that Nixon wanted to keep China and The Soviets at conventional struggle. This helped Americas interest in south east Asia. Smart move. They spent blood and treasure fighting each other and less NVA support.

    • @jmehn203
      @jmehn203 2 роки тому +2

      @@charleyarchuleta4932 , there are arguments against Nixon’s move because he could’ve let Russia finish off China 🇨🇳 in a time where the US was fighting China in Vietnam... The US was at war with Vietnam but in actuality were really fighting China... letting The USSR capitulate China would have helped the US in Vietnam 🇻🇳..
      But no one knows what would’ve really happened..
      Nixon’s move resulted in the US getting closer to China which with what’s been going on in recent years it puts a lot into question..
      The US used an opposite playbook on China than what USSR did..
      The US has given away a lot of technology to China when Russia wouldn’t even let them have one of their tanks..
      Was it worth it to give them all that technology, time will tell

  • @ConvoySeibatoron1313
    @ConvoySeibatoron1313 3 роки тому +2

    Man my parents were young kids during this time and they had no idea about The Sino-Soviet Border War going on

  • @tusharkhan1225
    @tusharkhan1225 4 роки тому +4

    Ur program is great bro......

  • @kyginger8005
    @kyginger8005 2 роки тому +88

    During the great leap forward and cultural revolution, despite the irrational political decision in the center, I believe what was even more horrific was the bureaucrats at the local level, who doubled the already wildly exaggerated goal of production, in exchange for their promotion via crafting fake data. It was really a death loop back then. Meanwhile, those who should have been responsible for the catastrophic result like Deng Xiaoping became the targets in the later cultural revolution, which ironically gave him the credit to seize the power after Mao's death. I think the most important lesson we learned from this history is not only about how devastating personal cult could go wrong but also how dangerous populist politics r.

    • @imatreebelieveme6094
      @imatreebelieveme6094 2 роки тому +3

      Apparently Xi Jinping and the CPC in general have openly admonished the cultural revolution and are now taking measures to fight corruption. Seems like they're making progress as more and more officials are getting arrested for corruption and the wikileaks docs contain an intelligence report complaining that it's harder and harder to get inside info because people can't be bought off anymore :'D

    • @joshlewis575
      @joshlewis575 2 роки тому +5

      @@imatreebelieveme6094 ah yes good ol "anti corruption arrests" like pooh n his cronies aren't the most corrupt people in the government. It's a purging of his enemies just like every dictator b4 him. Corruption n authoritarianism go hand n hand, forever and always.

    • @UmbertoAmante
      @UmbertoAmante 2 роки тому

      Is your comment a failed attack of the Honorable President Trump? If so then FU, Trump 2024 'take America back' When you have socialism you will have economic failure and death. Socialism=slavery=tyranny=theft=death!

    • @jenovajoestar6708
      @jenovajoestar6708 Рік тому +1

      和民粹有什么关系,我建议您不懂术语,不懂历史不要乱用词噢,你这种在现代是极为危险的。

    • @kyginger8005
      @kyginger8005 Рік тому

      @@jenovajoestar6708 笑嘻了,你说得对。

  • @volition2015
    @volition2015 Рік тому +2

    Correction needed: the white-blue-red flag in the thumbnail (next to PRC flag and Mao's profile) is that of modern day Russia, which was one of fifteen republics in the Soviet Union. USSR had a different national flag: red banner with gold hammer and sickle.

  • @capmidnite
    @capmidnite 2 роки тому +3

    33:33 Well, that was random. Playing Vivaldi's Gloria as background music for a bloody battle fought on the Chinese-Soviet border.

  • @garymckee8857
    @garymckee8857 4 роки тому +20

    I remember when I was six years old reading about this conflict but not much was published in the press.

    • @garymckee8857
      @garymckee8857 4 роки тому +1

      I was referring to the 1969 conflict.

    • @emsnewssupkis6453
      @emsnewssupkis6453 4 роки тому +1

      It began with a border skirmish in 1962. I heard it on Radio Bulgaria (short wave radio used by my father to track foreign news).

    • @dadauto1
      @dadauto1 4 роки тому +3

      Cmon man, you wouldn't have cared about this, probably couldnt even read when you were 6 years old lol.

    • @emsnewssupkis6453
      @emsnewssupkis6453 4 роки тому +2

      @@dadauto1 Lots of us could read at age 6. I began at age 3.

    • @garymckee8857
      @garymckee8857 4 роки тому

      @@emsnewssupkis6453 Thanks