Why Did Nazi Germany Abandon Their Plan To Invade Britain? | World War II In Colour | War Stories

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 кві 2024
  • Operation Sea Lion, Adolf Hitler's audacious plan to invade Britain during the Second World War. Explore the factors that thwarted Hitler's ambitions, from the resilience of the Royal Navy to the heroic efforts of the RAF during the Battle of Britain. In this documentary, uncover the strategic battles, the technological innovations, and the sheer determination that saved Britain from invasion.
    War Stories is your one stop shop for all things military history. From Waterloo to Verdun, we'll be bringing you only the best documentaries and stories from history's most engaging and dramatic conflicts.
    Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'WARSTORIES': historyhit.com/subscription
    You can find more from us on:
    / warstoriesdocs
    This channel is part of the History Hit Network. For any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
    #warstories #operationsealion #battleofbritain

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @pocketstring3634
    @pocketstring3634 24 дні тому +572

    I love documentaries made like this, narrated, historical footage, no talking heads repeating what the narrator just said, no contemporary investigative “reality tv” interrupting the flow, just old fashion documentary, perfect.

    • @garysims2029
      @garysims2029 20 днів тому +19

      This is a whole series on history channel it's called WW2 in color

    • @PcGamerify
      @PcGamerify 19 днів тому +5

      the maps make it fun and easier to follow along and understand

    • @darece001
      @darece001 18 днів тому

      But how are we going to know what to think without the media elite explaining it to us in the context of today’s “morally superior” point of view?

    • @darece001
      @darece001 18 днів тому

      But how are we supposed to know what to think without the elite media’s editorial re-interpretation of past events in light of today’s moral superiority

    • @jond181
      @jond181 18 днів тому +12

      Couldn’t have said it better myself …
      Nothing more annoying than shoveling 3-5 talking heads down our throats all saying the same thing in slightly different ways lol.

  • @dy6682
    @dy6682 26 днів тому +294

    The invention of radar was truly a remarkable invention.

    • @SmackWild-yb1rr
      @SmackWild-yb1rr 25 днів тому +26

      Even more so the development of the cavity magnetron, which effectively miniaturised radar allowing it to be mounted on aircraft. That was a game-changer, especially in the battle for the Atlantic.

    • @bernardedwards8461
      @bernardedwards8461 25 днів тому +21

      The Germans also had radar, but it was not as good as ours, and we kept a step ahead of them throughot the war..

    • @Neat_profile
      @Neat_profile 25 днів тому +2

      Indeed

    • @maryclynch9356
      @maryclynch9356 17 днів тому +29

      You can't beat the British for their sheer grit, intelligence and fortitude!

    • @Neat_profile
      @Neat_profile 17 днів тому +3

      @@maryclynch9356 The French,Scottish,Germans,Alpines, Balkaners by far and objectively beat the British in all three of these things.

  • @UniqueBovine
    @UniqueBovine 14 днів тому +91

    "It would have been faster for a German Commander to ring Bletchly to get his orders" is one of the funniest lines I've heard in a long time. Love British humour.

    • @lindamcgough3645
      @lindamcgough3645 6 днів тому +3

      Right?😂😂😂

    • @Dilley_G45
      @Dilley_G45 4 дні тому +1

      Crossed over lines like in Blackadder?

    • @snasty5
      @snasty5 2 дні тому

      Oyyyyyy its a tiddlywinker innnit???? U-S-A….U-S-A!!!!!! #revolutionarywarchamps

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 16 годин тому

      @@snasty5
      ?

  • @Wildcat221
    @Wildcat221 26 днів тому +252

    This series is one of the best for WW2, I watch it at least twice a year. I fall asleep to these 😂😂 am i insane? Maybe

    • @thefreestylefrEaK
      @thefreestylefrEaK 26 днів тому +33

      You're not the only one. I tuck myself into bed many nights re-watching many myself. They are magnificent! 👍

    • @teeman3566
      @teeman3566 26 днів тому +16

      It's like my grandad reading me a story

    • @kulio1214
      @kulio1214 26 днів тому +14

      I fall asleep every night to each episode

    • @Wildcat221
      @Wildcat221 26 днів тому +2

      @@kulio1214 same

    • @frandsenphilip1
      @frandsenphilip1 26 днів тому +8

      Seems like a number of others are like you! I'm guessing I've watched the entire series 20+ times. It's so good! And, I too have fallen asleep watching.

  • @arnepietruszewski9255
    @arnepietruszewski9255 25 днів тому +164

    There is one reason why we germans did not invade Britain. We did not have the capacity to do so. We lacked the transport capacity and the naval strenght to block the channel. We could not have used "little ships" to invade Britain cause the little ships could not transport heavy equipment and therefore an invasion was an illusionary plan.

    • @johnnyb8412
      @johnnyb8412 22 дні тому +37

      If you gained air dominance over English Channel then our navy would have been sitting ducks and an invasion would have been inevitable but thanks to RAF giving it there all and keeping air dominance over English Channel was absolutely vital.

    • @aa1415
      @aa1415 20 днів тому +19

      Also, as my mother pointed out, the documentary Hogan's Heroes demonstrated how stupid we were.

    • @arnepietruszewski9255
      @arnepietruszewski9255 20 днів тому +6

      @@aa1415 I second that.

    • @13thbiosphere
      @13thbiosphere 20 днів тому

      Adolf Hitler's main goal was always to conquer Russia Britain was just a distraction, it was too expensive

    • @Alakablam
      @Alakablam 20 днів тому +11

      After the invasion of the netherlands, and the amount of junkers our ancient air force managed to down before we surrendered (174 transport planes in 5 days) any para drop invasion of the UK was deemed way to risky anyway, and by boat.. yeah gl vs the british navy

  • @svenlima
    @svenlima 15 днів тому +123

    London Heathrow:
    Border Controll Officer asks: "Occupation?"
    German tourist answers: "No, just visiting."

    • @user-cx5pl2tu2h
      @user-cx5pl2tu2h 11 днів тому +1

      👍🏻
      Got it on 2nd take. 😅😅

    • @gavintuesday4959
      @gavintuesday4959 11 днів тому

      Well played, dear boy.

    • @saintace1northernsoul
      @saintace1northernsoul 9 днів тому

      Bwhahahahaha

    • @derka6118
      @derka6118 8 днів тому

      Lol. Germany and Britain went to war. Now they're friends and 🇯🇲 who was an allied for Britain can't enter Britain without a visa.

    • @jamesbutler6253
      @jamesbutler6253 7 днів тому

      Give credit to Frank Sanazi the creator of that joke.

  • @Badgersj
    @Badgersj 17 днів тому +50

    I've always known about Bletchley Park's part in the cracking of the Enigma code, but never known about the brilliant, essential Polish groundwork which provided the foundation for that achievement. Fantastic, all of you.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 15 днів тому +5

      It highlights the difference between Britain's approach in the war and Germany's. Britain received aid from Poland, with a Polish government in exile in Britain. Norway joined them. The British war effort was aided by Polish, Norwegian and Czech forces. Their good relations with former colonies (Dominions like Canada, Australia and New Zealand) and support from India who contributed large forces for the war effort as well.
      And entering into agreements to share all technology helped Britain and USA to leap ahead technologically during the war.
      German tech gets famous through wonder-weapons. But look at German guided weapons tech - a clumsy guidance system where a bombardier far behind the bomb would backseat-fly it into the target using the "Mark I eyeball." Less than a year later the US Navy deployed the first self-guided weapon - a radar guided bomb that would fly itself to the target allowing the launching aircraft to maneuver/evade after launching it.
      Look at the list of nations in the United Nations Alliance by the end of the war. The Allies made friends where they went. The Germans turned the world against them.
      (interesting example, the Americans solved some of their early logistical challenges in North Africa by shipping vehicles over in parts and training locals to assemble the vehicles for them offering higher wages than they were earning before. In contrast, you could look up the sabotage that was done by French workers on the trucks they were forced to build for the German war effort.)

    • @Badgersj
      @Badgersj 15 днів тому +2

      @@iansneddon2956 Interesting points to think about when considering a certain person's threat to leave NATO.

    • @joeysausage3437
      @joeysausage3437 15 днів тому

      ​@@BadgersjHe's not the only one.

    • @theguy455
      @theguy455 14 днів тому +2

      @@iansneddon2956 - South Africa also contributed troops to the war effort as it was a British colony in those days till 1961.

    • @video99couk
      @video99couk 12 днів тому

      It's well worth a visit if you can get there.

  • @cw7422
    @cw7422 26 днів тому +79

    When I was in the US Navy I was stationed at RAF Edzell. I lived in Brechin on a street named after Watson-Watt.

    • @fishingstevie8830
      @fishingstevie8830 12 днів тому +4

      Im a Scot and certainly heard of RAF Edzell for sure ..Brechin is in the "Angus region " of Scotland
      not far from Arbroath and Dundee etc . My late Father was in the British Royal Navy and on Russian convoys with the British in war days . Awe the best bud 👍

    • @user-ik3mk5vi8m
      @user-ik3mk5vi8m 10 днів тому +2

      Interesting 👍

    • @michaelbea6994
      @michaelbea6994 9 днів тому +5

      I am 87 years old, college educated and mindful of modern history. Nevertheless, I find these epic stories of WW2 to be most informative and fascinating.Keep 'em coming. -michaelB, Detroit, MI

    • @Gee-un6tq
      @Gee-un6tq 9 днів тому

      Watson What?

    • @mickeydrago9401
      @mickeydrago9401 6 днів тому +5

      I lived on that base as a kid. Early seventies. My dad was a dentist there...USN
      I learned Guy Fawkes Night (bonfire) before I learned Halloween.
      I learned BBC humor and Monty Python before I learned American humor when we repatriated back to the States
      We had at least one bunker on that base as a leftover from World War II... People hear about the blitz in London and all that but they don't realize how much Scotland was also bombed

  • @josephstumpp8804
    @josephstumpp8804 9 днів тому +17

    I also love these docs, they show the actual footage . Much respect to all of the brave men who filmed these dangerous times.

  • @clinthowe7629
    @clinthowe7629 26 днів тому +65

    this is my favorite series, I
    love the intro.

    • @AKCB4LIFE
      @AKCB4LIFE 26 днів тому +3

      Yes. This intro is like a lullaby

  • @user-wo4kn6ge6j
    @user-wo4kn6ge6j 26 днів тому +45

    Some historians, such as David Holland, state that the RAF actually had more than 700 fighters as of August 1940. England was also significantly out producing Germany in fighters. Under Lord Beaverbrook, they also developed an excellent fighter repair program. Dowding was actually more worried about the number of rested and healthy pilots than about the number of RAF fighters.

    • @lyndoncmp5751
      @lyndoncmp5751 26 днів тому +4

      And by the end of August the RAF had more available pilots than the Luftwaffe according to Bungay. It was the Luftwaffe that was losing the attrition rate in airmen, and aircraft. The RAF was stronger in September than in July. The opposite was the case for the Luftwaffe.

    • @boxlabs
      @boxlabs 25 днів тому

      we had lots of pilots but not enough planes. there were spitfires and hurricanes sitting on the runways without parts, manufacturing was also being bombed. we lost something like 300+ spitfires in 1940 alone. This was before the US helped a year later with shipments of stock and we were on our own as they attempted isolationism.

    • @DannyBoy777777
      @DannyBoy777777 25 днів тому +4

      ​@@boxlabsNonsense. The depots were over flowing. Britain produced 10,000 in 1940. Far more than 300 Spitfires were lost in 1940. A pittance considering 20,000 were produced during the war.

    • @DannyBoy777777
      @DannyBoy777777 25 днів тому

      ​@@lyndoncmp5751According to serving records this is the case. To be specific, the British had more fighter pilots than the Germans by that time.

    • @boxlabs
      @boxlabs 25 днів тому +2

      @@DannyBoy777777 that sounds like unrealistic propaganda, simply because there would be alot more spitfires at museums today.

  • @billballbuster7186
    @billballbuster7186 26 днів тому +22

    This the great, the colour in so well done. I hate the fact that the two men who did the most to win the Battle of Britain, Sir Hugh Dowding and Keith Park were stabbed in the back by Trafford Leigh-Mallory and Douglas Bader. Their "Big Wing" tactics were grossly over exaggerated both men lied to get Dowding and Park fired and succeeded. The Big Wing when used in 1941 resulted in the greatest loss of RAF fighter pilots in the whole war.

    • @jacksprat9172
      @jacksprat9172 16 днів тому

      Mallory was a confident moron with power, that's always a disaster. Beggars belief people like that are tolerated when the countries future is at stake.

    • @briansanderson480
      @briansanderson480 6 днів тому

      I thought the Poles won the battle of Britain on there own

    • @billballbuster7186
      @billballbuster7186 5 днів тому

      @@briansanderson480 It seems like that but 303 Polish Squadron were combat experienced at a time when most RAF pilots were green. The RAF soon caught up.

  • @ENGBriseB
    @ENGBriseB 14 днів тому +8

    Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.

  • @stevenewman1393
    @stevenewman1393 21 день тому +14

    This is truly one of my all time favorite TV series indeed on WW2 along with The World At War series and all the various others, I used to watch them all endlessly back in my much younger years indeed!👌😉👍.

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 15 годин тому

      Have a look at
      “THE GREAT WAR”
      a bbc 26 episode documentary series about WWI. It’s extremely good. It might be here on UA-cam, as I write this I haven’t looked for it but, yes it might be on here or somewhere online (Dailymotion maybe?). Kind regards to you 👍🏻

  • @thefreestylefrEaK
    @thefreestylefrEaK 26 днів тому +15

    Thank you War Stories. ALWAYS looking forward to your new episodes with eager anticipation!

  • @GA-fz2wt
    @GA-fz2wt 5 днів тому +4

    My Grandads both fought,im very proud of all the men and women who served and assisted. 🇬🇧 God bless them. Enjoyed the video.

  • @brianmacadam4793
    @brianmacadam4793 24 дні тому +12

    While the British army WAS short on Equipment, the Weremacht was COMPLETELY unsuited to a channel crossing.
    On top to that the Royal Navy was a superpower, AND the RAF was well prepared with it's fleet of Hurricanes and the newer spitfires, AND it's vastly superior command and control system, and of course the RADAR chain home system.
    The chances of Germany even launching an invasion were slim and there was no real chance of success.
    The allies were well aware of Germany's lack of amphibious equipment, and if Germany were to attempt a crossing Britain had the forces in its navy and airforce to stop any attempt.

    • @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-
      @Bullet-Tooth-Tony- 23 дні тому +3

      Yeah the Royal Navy alone had around 75 destroyers off the coast of kent, the Germans would be screwed if they tried it.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 19 днів тому +2

      Only temporarily short of equipment.
      By August 1940 the British Army troops in UK were fully equipped. 21 infantry divisions. 2 armored divisions. A third armored division training up. Surplus tanks and artillery were being sent to Egypt to bolster the defense of the vital Suez canal.
      So over 400,000 troops of the British Army ready to meet an invasion of their homeland. Germany couldn't reasonably hope to get more than a quarter of this number across the Channel.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 19 днів тому +2

      @@Bullet-Tooth-Tony- I have read it was 67 destroyers stationed around the UK for the Home Fleet. It would take time to get this force in the Channel but after that Germany could not resupply or reinforce its vastly outnumbered invasion force.

  • @gordonpeden6234
    @gordonpeden6234 26 днів тому +11

    Excellent Vid. Thanks for the upload.

    • @LewisDM
      @LewisDM 19 годин тому

      It's from a series, world at war (in colour HD) or something, it's at the start of the video - Well renowned series has been around a while now totally worth a watch

  • @kensvay4561
    @kensvay4561 26 днів тому +32

    My dad was involved in all this. He was a brilliant mathematician as is my son. Even today his war record is not available to us, his family. Ultra won the war in Europe and the Pacific.

    • @MangoTroubles-007
      @MangoTroubles-007 26 днів тому +3

      Yeah stop lying 🤥

    • @stevefox7566
      @stevefox7566 26 днів тому

      No doubt Ultra was a great innovation. But what won the war for the Allies (on both fronts) was America's ability to out manufacture war materials better than anyone else on the planet.

    • @ianworley8169
      @ianworley8169 25 днів тому +6

      ​@@MangoTroubles-007You base your response on nothing but your own ignorance and tendency towards rudeness.

    • @FaithnGod1558
      @FaithnGod1558 24 дні тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @FaithnGod1558
      @FaithnGod1558 24 дні тому +1

      @@ianworley8169oh my, ewwwww

  • @ruud9767
    @ruud9767 10 днів тому +6

    Much impressed by the quality of this documentary. Thanks for sharing!

  • @peterm3964
    @peterm3964 20 днів тому +5

    Beautiful quality . Well done Thanks .

  • @RubberToeYT
    @RubberToeYT 26 днів тому +27

    This has made me want to go watch the film battle of britain

    • @RYUEN765
      @RYUEN765 26 днів тому +5

      Fantastic movie they don’t make them like that anymore

    • @davidshattock9522
      @davidshattock9522 26 днів тому +4

      Still a great film enjoy the aircraft in the film no CGI then they were loaned by air forces and museums etc

    • @dantevxv1501
      @dantevxv1501 15 днів тому +1

      The greatest story never told is even better, or europa the last battle/battle europa. If you've got the fortitude and integrity Hellstorm is a must watch

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 15 годин тому

      @@dantevxv1501
      Greatest Story is embarrassing and provides a target for enemies to mock us right thinking people.
      Europa: the last battle is far better. I went so far as securing a copy on DVD from eBay of all places, a German chap had made a large number of copies on dvd & I bought one from him.

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 26 днів тому +14

    It was informative and wonderful historical coverage video about that matter.

  • @GeorgeConwell
    @GeorgeConwell 10 днів тому +2

    This is very well done.I had a number of relatives who were in the military in WWII. I even had an uncle in the Marines who met his wife,an Australian female soldier during the fighting.They had each other's back for the rest of their lives.❤😢

    • @mattomite9097
      @mattomite9097 9 днів тому

      “Australian female soldier” I would love to hear more about her and what she did. Aussies are good people and have always helped us here in the US. They are tough, resourceful, have integrity, and a true grit.

  • @You-in6lm
    @You-in6lm 15 днів тому +37

    We’ve let these men down who fought for this country the state it’s in today.

    • @unnamedchannel1237
      @unnamedchannel1237 12 днів тому +2

      Ironically they fought for exactly this , the right for people to live how they want .

    • @seane6616
      @seane6616 9 днів тому

      @@unnamedchannel1237 I dont want to be censored by youtube and all other media

    • @frankfurter63
      @frankfurter63 9 днів тому +2

      You got that right. We are going down.

    • @derka6118
      @derka6118 8 днів тому

      That's a fact!

    • @wimschmied3800
      @wimschmied3800 7 днів тому +3

      The state of the country is exactly what they fought for, albeit unknowingly.

  • @markcooke5270
    @markcooke5270 7 днів тому +4

    Churchills speech still makes me shiver today .... Be the best 🇬🇧

  • @shirleydrury5565
    @shirleydrury5565 11 днів тому +2

    Thank you for upload much enjoyed😊😊

  • @hotchihuahua1546
    @hotchihuahua1546 9 днів тому +2

    History and the preservation of these historical events cannot be underestimated for their value for future conflicts !
    As it’s always been , history repeats itself !

  • @petermalloy5360
    @petermalloy5360 22 дні тому +8

    Polish,NewZealand,Australian and South African pilots also answered the call and fought for England in the battle of Britain

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 21 день тому +9

      I thought I'd create a simple "visual aid" in order to assist people learning about the history of the battle of Britain. There is much ongoing debate about the nationalities and proportions of RAF fighter pilots who took part in the battle, with occasionally a furtive aspect which attempts to portray the battle as a victory of "mostly Foreign pilots". Below is an accurate graphical representation of the proportion of pilot nationalities serving within RAF Fighter Command during the summer of 1940.
      Each flag is roughly equivalent to 30 pilots, The numbers after each nation are the actual number of pilots from that country, and the approximate percentage of RAF Fighter Command's establishment in the summer of 1940 that they represented.
      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 UK (2342) (80%)
      🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱 Poland (145) (5%)
      🇳🇿🇳🇿🇳🇿🇳🇿 New Zealand (127) (4%)
      🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 Canada (112) (4%) (1940 flag emoji not available)
      🇨🇿🇨🇿🇨🇿 Czechoslovakia (88) (3%)
      🇦🇺 Australia (32) (1%)
      🇧🇪 Belgium (28) (1%)
      🇿🇦 S. Africa (25) (1%) (1940 flag emoji not available)
      🇺🇳 Other nations (France (13), R o Ireland (10), USA (9), Rhodesia (3), Newfoundland (1), Jamaica (1), Barbados (1)) (1%)
      (And just to preempt any wandering idiot lefty "Identity warriors" from protesting about "The lack of credit given to the black pilots who fought in the battle of Britain"... the pilots from South Africa, Rhodesia & the Caribbean were all of white descent).

    • @BingoFrogstrangler
      @BingoFrogstrangler 21 день тому +2

      @@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684Brilliant,thank you for putting the record straight.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 20 днів тому +1

      @@BingoFrogstrangler The British historic record has never attempted to airbrush the commonwealth and foreign pilots who flew with RAF Fighter Command that summer out of history... but there's an increasing number of revisionist anti-Brit commenters who brazenly try to over represent the foreign contribution and downplay the overwhleming role of British born pilots..... attempting to snidily portray the situation as one where "Europe saved Britain" when the opposite is FAR closer to the truth.
      For further information search out the "Battle of Britain Historical Society" and the "Battle of Britain Memorial Trust" who continue to catalogue and honour the lives of ALL those who took part in the British side of the struggle in 1940.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 20 днів тому +1

      @@BingoFrogstrangler The British historic record has never attempted to airbrush the commonwealth and foreign pilots who flew with RAF Fighter Command that summer out of history... but there's an increasing number of revisionist anti-Brit commenters who brazenly try to over represent the foreign contribution and downplay the overwhleming role of British born pilots..... attempting to snidily portray the situation as one where "Europe saved Britain" when the opposite is FAR closer to the truth. That was my motivation to quickly assemble my post above.
      For further information search out the "Battle of Britain Historical Society" and the "Battle of Britain Memorial Trust" who continue to catalogue and honour the lives of ALL those who took part in the British side of the struggle in 1940.

    • @gameofpawns2264
      @gameofpawns2264 13 днів тому +2

      And then Churchill kicked the Poles out of the country, lied about the Russian massacre of Polish citizen in the Katrina forest and gave Poland to Russia

  • @chrisvickers7928
    @chrisvickers7928 26 днів тому +7

    I read William L Shirer's autobiography. Volume 2 covered his years as a radio correspondent for CBS in Berlin. The Germans in 1940 toured the foreign press around the channel ports to show how many barges they had prepared for Operation Sealion. Shirer, who was familiar with the area from his many years in France, wondered why what should have been a trip of minutes by car took hours. The he realized the barges from port to port had the same registration numbers. In his broadcast about what he saw, he compared the barges to certain American baseball players, a reference the German censors completely missed, but American audiences realized the players in question had kept the same uniform numbers when traded from team to team. The Germans had no where near enough transport for 20 divisions.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 25 днів тому +4

      'The Germans had no where near enough transport for 20 divisions.' The assault wave was to consist of nine divisions and a seriously under strength parachute division.
      Walter Ansel, who had access to Kriegsmarine records at the end of the war, determined that the Germans had requisitioned 180 transport ship (largely small coasting vessels), just over 2,100 converted barges, 400 tugs/trawlers, and 1,200 motor boats, The first wave was to consist of around 850 barges, towed in pairs by the tugs/trawlers and the transports, would carry the leading elements of each division.
      The Germans had enough vessels to carry out their alloted tasks. What they did not have, of course, was any means of protecting this ramshackle flotilla from the 70 RN cruisers and destroyers which were based some five hours steaming from Dover, supported by around 500 or so smaller warships.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 25 днів тому +2

      @@dovetonsturdee7033 And I would add that with 21 infantry divisions and 2 armored divisions of the British Army (all fully equipped) that's over 400,000 troops defending Britain against a force that wouldn't be much (if any) over 100,000 men.

    • @Bullet-Tooth-Tony-
      @Bullet-Tooth-Tony- 14 днів тому

      @@iansneddon2956 Churchill apparently was even willing to go as far as to use chemical weapons on the beach landings, that's the kind of measures he would have took if it meant stopping a German invasion.

    • @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044
      @charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 9 днів тому

      Well observed and a skilled way of divulging 🫡

  • @johnshaw359
    @johnshaw359 5 днів тому +2

    A well resolved documentary of the standard we used to get. Reminded me of the World-At-War series from the 70s.

  • @TheBestDog
    @TheBestDog 26 днів тому +29

    Please stop blurring the images that display the human casualties of war. I don’t mind tapping ‘OK’ to proceed. It’s not a bother at all.

    • @BostonsF1nest
      @BostonsF1nest 25 днів тому +4

      This series has been uploaded 10 other times at least on other channel’s uncensored

    • @ryanm2648
      @ryanm2648 25 днів тому +5

      It's because ads wont be shown and it will not reach as many people. The video would get way less views thanks to youtubes policies

    • @philliphall5198
      @philliphall5198 21 день тому +1

      I guess there waiting for us to witness it again before long and we will 😢😢😢

    • @matt.willoughby
      @matt.willoughby 15 днів тому +1

      Why do you want to see that? It says a lot about you tbh

    • @ryshellso526
      @ryshellso526 7 днів тому +2

      ​@matt.willoughby it's human history. Stop censoring it.

  • @chriswood8970
    @chriswood8970 26 днів тому +16

    Very interesting video. Loved it

    • @jakemoore6288
      @jakemoore6288 26 днів тому +5

      bro watched a 52 minute video in 3 minutes

  • @user-po3ev7is5w
    @user-po3ev7is5w 26 днів тому +38

    Two reasons: No air dominance and no sea dominance over the invasion area.

    • @jebbroham1776
      @jebbroham1776 21 день тому +4

      They had air dominance over Southern England until the decision was made to switch bombing priorities to the London area. In fact prior to that fateful order the RAF was less than a week from total collapse in the South and even Churchill remarked that the accidental bombing of Berlin was a Godsend to their survival because it drew Hitler's rage away from their already crippled air bases and gave them the breathing room the RAF needed.

    • @user-po3ev7is5w
      @user-po3ev7is5w 21 день тому +9

      @@jebbroham1776 WRONG! They NEVER had even air superiority over South England. They ALWAYS lost more pilots than the British did. LMAO

    • @jebbroham1776
      @jebbroham1776 21 день тому +2

      @@user-po3ev7is5w WRONG, the RAF in September 1940 was on it’s last gasp when Goering switched targets to London and other major cities.

    • @philliphall5198
      @philliphall5198 21 день тому +2

      Plus transportation, Hugh number of very large ships

    • @user-po3ev7is5w
      @user-po3ev7is5w 21 день тому +2

      @@philliphall5198 Yes, they completely lacked landing craft of all types

  • @user-pk7fe9ok8r
    @user-pk7fe9ok8r 9 днів тому +1

    the presentation this documentary….. such a perfect way of making a video. don’t even have to look at his channel, it’s an instant sub. 🙏❤️

  • @thisissoeasy
    @thisissoeasy 13 днів тому +1

    Outstanding documentary! Thank you.

  • @marksretrogames9297
    @marksretrogames9297 14 днів тому +5

    I have watch so many ww2 documents never get Bored of them love ww2 history

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram 15 днів тому +5

    So many heroes, most of whom we'll never hear of. In a real way we owe them our continued freedom - let's not squander it. They deserve a better legacy than that.

  • @iambiggus
    @iambiggus 13 днів тому +1

    A very enjoyable watch. Thank you.

  • @SaulEmersonAuthor
    @SaulEmersonAuthor 9 днів тому +1

    I was once tootling about the A5 - as you do - exploring for photography - & end up on a smaller road with what at first glance looked like a standard WW2 memorial stone - with writing on it.
    It was just sat there by a gate to a very small field - about as innocuous as it gets!
    I thought that I should at least take the trouble to stop & read it.
    Turns out - it was the Birth of Radar Memorial!!
    In that very field, they set up the first tower - to demonstrate the concept - as it needed a direct line of sight to the second tower, in Daventry.
    It was just awesome to think what the goings-on on that field represented & were - so many moons ago.

  • @-DC-
    @-DC- 15 днів тому +6

    My Great Grandfather personally took out at least ten Luftwaffe Aircraft, He always was a Terrible Mechanic.

  • @Busybee-tt1qu
    @Busybee-tt1qu 25 днів тому +17

    Often forgotten is at that time the U.K. had a huge navy. Hitlers generals knew that any attempt to cross the channel the ships in Scapa flow would move into the channel and under cover of the Air Force would decimate the German troops in there barges. Also at that time the U.K. standing army saved from Dunkirk would have dispatched any airborne troops ,together with a population who hated the Nazis. So it’s easy to see why operation sea lion was cancelled .

    • @galdessa1
      @galdessa1 17 днів тому +1

      There is another operation going on these days and seems to be a bit slower, but its working. Nostradamus wrote about it, The invasion of Europe from the south.

    • @arnepietruszewski9255
      @arnepietruszewski9255 11 днів тому

      Which barges? The ones germany did not have?

    • @Busybee-tt1qu
      @Busybee-tt1qu 11 днів тому

      @@arnepietruszewski9255 The Germans had assembled 2,400 barges for the invasion 860 from Germany, 1200 from the Netherlands and Belgium and 350 from France . 800 were powered .The plan was to tow all the barges by tugs to the U.K. shore the powered ones would then make there way ashore the unpowered ones would be towed ashore by the tugs.

    • @anteep4900
      @anteep4900 7 днів тому

      @@arnepietruszewski9255 The Germans had assembled 2,400 barges for the invasion 860 from Germany, 1200 from the Netherlands and Belgium and 350 from France . 800 were powered .The plan was to tow all the barges by tugs to the U.K. shore the powered ones would then make there way ashore the unpowered ones would be towed ashore by the tugs.

  • @bertreynolds8146
    @bertreynolds8146 2 дні тому +1

    Old documentary but one of the best.

  • @rinusbeckers119
    @rinusbeckers119 25 днів тому +5

    They lost about 30% of their transport aircraft fleet (150 planes) in the fighting around The Hague in May 1940 and 25% of the 8000 German paratroopers employed were captured and shipped to Britain by the Dutch before the Dutch capitulation. This was a serious setback for any German plans for an airborne assault on the UK in the summer of 1940.

  • @user-xh3lz9xt4l
    @user-xh3lz9xt4l 21 день тому +6

    It wasnt only the South East it was all over the UK there are still 5 pill boxes within walking distance of my home in Sunderland

  • @Man2quilla
    @Man2quilla 21 день тому +3

    This has been my go-to wwii documentary for years

  • @axelamps1279
    @axelamps1279 5 днів тому

    Utterly superb, engaging, factual, and inyeresting piece with original footage. Perfect!

  • @MrPete1x
    @MrPete1x 8 днів тому

    Excellent, thank you for showing this

  • @wweminehead5458
    @wweminehead5458 20 днів тому +4

    Love listening to these while I try to sleep

  • @joeymurdazalotmore6355
    @joeymurdazalotmore6355 25 днів тому +5

    this is on military channel weekly

  • @ericscottstevens
    @ericscottstevens 11 днів тому +1

    13:00 Grandfather participated on the radar and infrastructure attacks with I./StG 77 at Thorney Island.
    Late fighter cover in and not enough fighter cover outbound meant it was a run for their lives back across the channel in slow Stukas.
    His pilot out of their last attack dive , dove low again and went very low over the channel and survived with the help of a Stuka defensive technique known as steep curves.

  • @craigbeatty8565
    @craigbeatty8565 4 дні тому +1

    Great docos. Pity about the poor camera work. Those out of focus clips are very unprofessional.

  • @kensvay4561
    @kensvay4561 26 днів тому +5

    My dad was intelligence officer on the Loftenen Raid. He later lived in the mountains in Norway with the resistance and learned to speak Norwegian. He was on of the 20 officers sent from Afghanistan to England because of a shortage of officers with war experience. They knew all the dirty tricks from the Afghans. One of their first operations in Norway involved an ambush of 60 Germans on bicycles. They killed all of them.

  • @smith8840
    @smith8840 12 днів тому +7

    The Germans thought they were the playground bully, then they got cracked in the jaw.

    • @seansmith445
      @seansmith445 6 днів тому

      "Judea declares war on Germany" Daily Express 1933. Germany wasn't a bully they were acting defensively.

  • @sudsysutherland359
    @sudsysutherland359 12 днів тому +2

    Every time I hear the Winston Churchill speech at the beginning of this documentary I think of the “Iron Maiden” song “2 Minutes To Midnight” lol

  • @Certi-ji5tg
    @Certi-ji5tg 3 дні тому +1

    bro dis video is soo f ing good thank you posting dis

  • @rossmcclure5618
    @rossmcclure5618 26 днів тому +5

    Captain of the French ship needed that graph of f&$@ around and find out. He miscalculated how much find out he was going to get.

    • @peters620
      @peters620 23 дні тому +1

      It was badly handled by the British commander who couldn't put his arrogance aside for a minute. Instead he sent a lower officer who ended up offending the French commander. The French were ready to sail to the French Caribbean Islands.

  • @American_Goverment
    @American_Goverment 26 днів тому +7

    How the heck are you able to drop so many awesome vids in such a short amount of time

    • @breamoreboy
      @breamoreboy 26 днів тому +4

      Extremely easily, as this was first shown on TV years ago 😊

  • @ohasis8331
    @ohasis8331 12 днів тому +1

    Excellent, thank you.

  • @alexko3464
    @alexko3464 4 дні тому +1

    One of best documentaries i have seen in long time

  • @geoffreymarshall639
    @geoffreymarshall639 26 днів тому +16

    The Germans needed to gain more than control of the air to launch an invasion. They also needed naval superiority which they did not have. They only had 10+ destroyers having lost ten at Narvick. Without them they had nothing to defend the landing barges with, especially at night. Also the barges he wanted to use came from the Rhine and apart from a lot of them not having a reverse German industry needed those barges to function. The window
    for the Germans was extremely narrow.

    • @mrbaab5932
      @mrbaab5932 25 днів тому

      The thing was that the British home fleet was way up in Northern Scotland Scapa Flow. It would take days for them to arrive. By that time most of the German troops would have landed. The British home fleet would have been able to block resupply.

    • @brianmacadam4793
      @brianmacadam4793 24 дні тому

      @@mrbaab5932 The Navy was well informed of Germany's amphibious abilities, and would have been able to have a fleet in place in ample time to respond to any invasion attempt. It would take weeks to assemble an invasion force and the concentrated army would be an easy target to locate, although it would be costly to assault

    • @fuzzyhair321
      @fuzzyhair321 22 дні тому

      Home fleet would of thrown themselves into a German invasion. The destroyer captains tended to be little cooked

    • @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2
      @meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2 11 днів тому

      Also read up on the seaborne part of the German invasion of Crete. Royal Navy destroyers got in amongst the barges and it was a disaster. The airborne part of the Crete operation that did succeed was however so costly that the Germans never tried it again. Attacking Britain where there were more forces available to resist would have been even more costly.

    • @youraveragescotsman7119
      @youraveragescotsman7119 4 дні тому

      @@mrbaab5932
      Anti-Invasion patrols that consisted of 60+ Destroyers and Cruisers were stationed 6 hours away, while the Home Fleet would reach the Channel within a day if they went full speed (which they absolutely would). Germany can't fight that, nor land enough forces before resupply gets cut off and the Germans start taking shells from the beaches and the seas.

  • @earlshaner4441
    @earlshaner4441 26 днів тому +12

    Outstanding video

    • @ColinFreeman-kh9us
      @ColinFreeman-kh9us 26 днів тому

      Bot

    • @earlshaner4441
      @earlshaner4441 26 днів тому +1

      Not even close my friend and friends take care of friends

    • @ColinFreeman-kh9us
      @ColinFreeman-kh9us 26 днів тому +1

      Your friends are a strange lot , others call them collaborators or those who look the other way meekly allowing tyranny to happen

    • @earlshaner4441
      @earlshaner4441 26 днів тому

      I'm not surprised my friend we love history and weapons and want everyone to know American history and this scares people who don't want to know American history and right and wrong

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 15 годин тому

      @@earlshaner4441 But not EVERYONE cares to know about American history.
      History is global and the great majority of it occurred before the US was even in existence.
      I’m not meaning to sound
      anti-yank I love the USA and it’s people. I’m just being factual.

  • @donrobertson4940
    @donrobertson4940 17 днів тому +1

    Churchill's beaches speech wasn't recorded or broadcast at the time. Extracts were read out by BBC newsreaders. It was recorded in 1949.

  • @11sutty
    @11sutty 25 днів тому +2

    Put some more adds on please

  • @dianeirvine7624
    @dianeirvine7624 18 днів тому +9

    Perhaps Adolph after looking in his crystal ball seeing the future with rishi in charge caused him to change his mind to invade

  • @kingdad8457
    @kingdad8457 18 днів тому +8

    American industrial strength was and still is, mindblowing

    • @seane6616
      @seane6616 9 днів тому +2

      Still is? How do you figure that?

    • @people_are_sheep
      @people_are_sheep 4 дні тому

      Was.

    • @peres9559
      @peres9559 4 дні тому

      ​@@seane6616it is, and america re-industrialize under Biden

  • @skscotch
    @skscotch 6 днів тому

    Absolutely amazing

  • @unnamedchannel1237
    @unnamedchannel1237 12 днів тому +2

    The enigma was a bit more complex than just the three rotors there were other variants that could be used by changing the cables on the front of the machine

  • @c.LOSER.to.G0.d
    @c.LOSER.to.G0.d 17 днів тому +4

    TL;DR: Water.
    There was water in the way!

  • @davidmcmaster7688
    @davidmcmaster7688 23 дні тому +3

    Ok, now I remember, this is the World at War series but colorized

  • @rubensosatuub
    @rubensosatuub 14 днів тому +1

    Where's the sequel?

  • @nicoletteshaw8431
    @nicoletteshaw8431 2 дні тому +1

    Can anyone please tell me the name of the ww2 documentary programme series that was screened in the mid 60s on tv....... As a young person i watched these doc's with great interest..... The music was sad when thing's were going bad,and very upbeat when thing's were going great!!!......they must be available to see im certain????? ..... David Shaw.

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 2 дні тому +1

      Well there was,
      “The World At War”
      that was late 60’s or actually 70’s I think.
      Very famous very well thought of documentary.
      It’s notable because when it was made there was still many Nazis still alive and several are interviewed in the episodes.

    • @nicoletteshaw8431
      @nicoletteshaw8431 2 дні тому +1

      Thanks for taking the time to reply to my query...... The ww 2 series was shown around 1965 , earlier than "world at war"
      Again thanks for trying!.....
      Anyone else know the answer please????

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 16 годин тому

      @@nicoletteshaw8431which country are you in? I’ve never come across a ww2 documentary series made in the ‘60’s in Britain (there was however an EXTREMELY good ww1 documentary series made in Britain in the ‘60’s).
      In the USA there were several ww2 documentary films made in the ‘60’s, I think.

  • @user-wo4kn6ge6j
    @user-wo4kn6ge6j 26 днів тому +4

    The Luftwaffe fighter pilots were being badly stressed by repeated small RAF bombing raids on German fighter bases.

  • @minhthunguyendang9900
    @minhthunguyendang9900 26 днів тому +3

    The colorization is perfect

  • @janinapalmer8368
    @janinapalmer8368 11 днів тому +1

    Excellent documentary...

  • @Laurenciusthefifth
    @Laurenciusthefifth 13 днів тому +2

    If you want to have a stomach ache then watch Europa The Last Battle, Hellstorm and A.H. the greatest story never told.

  • @yankee_tango
    @yankee_tango 15 днів тому +6

    There is one aircraft not mentioned in this documentary that was crucial to the winning of the air war with Germany. It is the De Haviland Mosquito (DH98). It was an aircraft made out of wood was very fast and could be used as either a fighter or as a bomber. They were used mainly for night fighting when equipped with radar, which the British had, it would also fly out ahead of several bombing missions and as the Germans got airborne they would ambush them and destroy many of the fighters. So you could say the British had discovered stealth technology when this plane was built because the Germans had radar shortly after taking over France, with the DH98 being made from wood and some plastics it had a smaller than normal radar signature and it was ignored.

    • @PreservationEnthusiast
      @PreservationEnthusiast 12 днів тому +4

      It's not mentioned because you are wrong with respect to the question of what stopped Hitler's invasion plans.
      The Mosquito did play a part later in the war but that was after the end of 1941 when the Americans were on board and the threat of invasion had subsided.
      Also the Mosquito was not designed as a fighter. It was a stealth bomber against specific targets. Fighter capability was later added, but it was not designed as a dog fight plane relying on speed not manoeuvrabiluty or armour.
      So your mention of the Mosquito with regard to the topic in question is entirely wrong.

    • @arnepietruszewski9255
      @arnepietruszewski9255 11 днів тому

      I think they ignored the mosquitos cause they were not the most dangerous targets in the sky. Why should you attack some small squadrons of mosquitos if you can attack a 1000 bomber swarm? The mosquitos did not have the carry capacity of B-17 or B-24 or the heavy british bombers which makes it a less viable target also it was fast sometimes even as fast as a fighter. Dont get me wrong, the Mosquito was the best twin engine plane of WW2 but it was not decisive in any way. The Mosquito was somewhat of a special operations plane used for special tasks like shooting down fighters that were returning to base or bomb special targets that could only be attacked by fast low flying planes. If they had used it like an heavy bomber we would look different at it.

    • @wobblybobengland
      @wobblybobengland 11 днів тому +1

      Like the chap stated it did come later, but the brilliance of the thing, stopping a Göring speech on live radio and the Goebbels speech too. Göring said of it:
      In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked

    • @yankee_tango
      @yankee_tango 10 днів тому

      @@wobblybobengland That is the genius of it, plus the fact it could not be seen on radar either.

    • @sydmccreath4554
      @sydmccreath4554 15 годин тому

      @yankee_tango
      The mosquito didn’t even EXIST yet you daft twonk.

  • @andyreidsmustache9247
    @andyreidsmustache9247 9 днів тому

    I really like these videos. I just watched Band of Brothers and am watching the Pacific and it increased my interest in WW2.

  • @Winddodger2732
    @Winddodger2732 2 дні тому +2

    Simply put : The Royal Navy and the RAF !

  • @craiglarge5925
    @craiglarge5925 20 днів тому +49

    When the British were brave, resourceful, and resolute.

    • @dantevxv1501
      @dantevxv1501 15 днів тому +7

      And blinded by false media lies to fight the wrong enemy

    • @davidshoup3856
      @davidshoup3856 15 днів тому +5

      "1930's appeasement", Sept. 3, 1939 when Poland fought alone, the Phoney War 1939-40, Dunkirk June 1940 ??? Or after when they got back to the UK and didn't have to stand, fight, stop and defeat the German Army anymore? Russia did that

    • @dantevxv1501
      @dantevxv1501 15 днів тому +1

      @@davidshoup3856 people seem to forget the jewish bolsheviks in russia were the aggressor in the east and the jewish crimes against german civilians in territory given to the polish in the versailles treaty

    • @The_Orgazoid
      @The_Orgazoid 15 днів тому

      get a grip

    • @matt.willoughby
      @matt.willoughby 15 днів тому +2

      It's weird how some people think that the citizens of England past were somehow different to us today 🤔
      This is not the case, we are exactly the same as our grandparents generation and they would behave exactly as we do now in our environment.

  • @hyrondongle2473
    @hyrondongle2473 26 днів тому +6

    Thank Mr Felton!

  • @VintageVVVV888
    @VintageVVVV888 12 днів тому +2

    The old switch the sign post trick wouldn’t work these days

    • @peternagy-im4be
      @peternagy-im4be 8 днів тому

      That's pretty funny and you're a funny guy

  • @redskinjim
    @redskinjim 3 дні тому

    Great stuff

  • @philandrawis6232
    @philandrawis6232 26 днів тому +4

    if anyone has visited the coast of England facing Europe and saw the cliff of Dover or the seven sisters stretch it's a formidable wall that can't be breached or broken yes there are gaps in between but those had artillery covering those gaps + mine and rows of barbed wire yes a bunch of comando can get throw those gaps but that is all they can't get tank support or heavy armour to cross farther inland they would have held their ground for a day or 2 but thereafter they would have been eliminated totally, the alternative is to find open beaches but that meant longer travel time by the sea and the English Channel can be really an obstacle by itself and a tempremental one too, there were sea mines in the areas were a landing can be a possibility and those barges would have been blown up with their occupants to kingdom kan, as for paratrooper landings well that would have been possible and could have caused some problems but even 10,000 or 20,000 landing would have been a total mascara for them, because practically every town and village had armed guards, and as each day passed by thousands of troops were coming in from commonwealth and other nations to help by ships, boat and fishing boats although the numbers cna't be confirmed acuratly but they figured their is around 500,000 fighting men ready and if you add the home guards another 150,000 fully armed

  • @leewarwick6592
    @leewarwick6592 19 днів тому +4

    Fantastic in colour,

  • @buddhapunkz
    @buddhapunkz 16 днів тому +1

    The narrator’s voice is so familiar. Is this from the series The World at War?

    • @MKPFave
      @MKPFave 16 днів тому +3

      The World at War series was narrated by Laurence Olivier.

  • @Jonesy19696
    @Jonesy19696 5 днів тому +1

    Great documentary 😊

  • @hello7533
    @hello7533 18 днів тому +15

    It just didnt feel reich

  • @Deejaybor
    @Deejaybor 25 днів тому +4

    @7:12 That crystal meth look

  • @eric7922
    @eric7922 14 днів тому +2

    This series is very well done but The World at War is the definitive WWII series in my opinion. WWII in Colour borrows heavily from it on multiple levels.

    • @seansmith445
      @seansmith445 6 днів тому

      I prefer "Europa the last battle" Much more factual.

  • @Zizimaza
    @Zizimaza 15 днів тому +1

    Does anyone know the intro song?

    • @ocumstweezers
      @ocumstweezers 15 днів тому

      I thought it sounded like the theme music to "World at War".
      I grew up watching that on PBS.
      This documentary comes from the days when the BBC had composers, arrangers and orchestras, in house.
      It sounds like it's just dem cats to me.
      It's pretty good.
      I thought it sounded like the theme music to "World at War". I grew up watching that on PBS, that was in black and white, this is colorized.

    • @Zizimaza
      @Zizimaza 15 днів тому

      Edit: found the intro song:
      ua-cam.com/video/X2aBqqZ2uLs/v-deo.htmlsi=qGAWMF7Td89u3lwL
      I think this one is right after it:
      ua-cam.com/video/hFxcJIcCaDI/v-deo.html&ab_channel=NelsonAlvarezNAP
      All this stuff below is not correct, but it's there for context
      =======
      ​@@ocumstweezers Okay at first your message was a bit confusing, but ultimately very helpful. I did some digging and you're correct it's from "World at War"! I looked up the "World at War" theme song but that wasn't it, but it sounded thematically very similar, so I looked up the composer Carl Davis (RIP), and then looked up the whole soundtrack for the show and there it was-- it's called "Theme and German March". Thank you​!
      ua-cam.com/video/7THzbqS1P8I/v-deo.html&ab_channel=TheCityofPraguePhilharmonicOrchestra-Topic

    • @ocumstweezers
      @ocumstweezers 15 днів тому

      @@Zizimaza Shazam is great, but you only get a few tunes for free.
      You can tell that these documentaries were created by people who witnessed it or their students.
      I'm enjoying this show, but they don't give you the order, I think the next after the battle of Britain is "operation barbarosa"
      The Commander of the RAF in the UK was great, But General Zukov was one of the greatest military commanders in history.
      A lot of folk in the west don't even know his name.

  • @Crashed131963
    @Crashed131963 19 днів тому +6

    Germany lost the air war over Britain and you can not do a amphibious landing without complete air superiority .

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 19 днів тому

      Complete naval inferiority presented a "bit of a challenge" (in the style of British understatement).
      Germany: We'll send our forces over on un-seaworthy riverboats and barges with relatively no defense and assume a few mines we scatter around and our 800 or so bombers escorted by 600 or so fighters will frighten the Royal Navy away.
      RAF: We're still here. We have several hundred fighters ready to go and could make it a thousand if we send up our reserves. We're not going to just sit back and watch.
      Royal Navy: They call it the ENGLISH Channel. Rule Britania, Britania Rule the Waves. Britons Never Never Never Shall Be Slaves. Fight! Fight! Fight!
      (would pity the officers and crew of the last destroyers to get to the Channel who would have had nothing left to attack and would have to hang their heads when asked "How many German boats did you sink?")

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 19 днів тому

      @@iansneddon2956 Earl St. Vincent's statement to the House of Lords in 1801, 'I do not say, my Lords, that they will not come. I only say, they will not come by sea,' still held good in 1940.
      Or, as the remarkably named C-in-C at the Nore, Sir Reginald Plunkett-Ernle-Earle-Drax, remarked, rather less elegantly 'To defeat the invasion force, we need gunfire and plenty of it.'
      The fact that the Royal Navy Pink List from 16 September, 1940, shows some seventy destroyers and light cruisers within five hours steaming of the Straits of Dover suggests that his wish might well have been granted.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 17 днів тому

      @@dovetonsturdee7033 I recall the Admiralty said they could not guarantee that the Germans would not be able to land forces in the South of England. Due to the hours needed to assemble in strength. But they would ensure that whatever landed would not be reinforced or resupplied.
      For gunfire, it would be everything from the 8 inch, 6 inch and 4.7 inch main guns down to an abundance of 2 pounder pom-poms.
      But with the potential for a, in some context, significant force landed and fighting the British Army, I think the biggest battle would be after the smoke cleared and the Royal Navy and British Army argue about who the monument should be dedicated to (with the RAF wanting to weigh in too).

    • @user-hu1yi8ox9z
      @user-hu1yi8ox9z 14 днів тому

      Britain didn't have the man power to launch an Invasion force on its own. While Britain provided the majority of ships on D day, the U.S had allot more Soldiers

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 14 днів тому +1

      @@user-hu1yi8ox9z Actually, for every two US soldiers who landed on the beaches of Normandy, there were three British & Canadians.

  • @ChrisJensen-se9rj
    @ChrisJensen-se9rj 26 днів тому +4

    Why did they "abandon plans"?
    Because the " plans" were half hearted " pie in the sky"!
    The Kriegsmarine was in no way equipped with the specialist landing and support craft necessary to not only ferry across the initial assault waves, but maintain and supply them once ashore.
    The Luftwaffe was basically a tactical ground support element, not equipped for strategic bombing or even able to secure the air superiority that was an absolute essential.
    The Norwegian campaign was a disaster for the Kriegsmarine, an arm of service that found itself unable to support let alone supply any landing of any description.
    Any troops landed or parachuted in would have found themselves quickly running out of everything necessary for sustainable operations, with even an airlift campaign unable to deliver the necessary quantities.
    Any troops would have been stranded with no way back to mainland Europe other than swimming there.
    This would have handed Britain a MASSIVE propaganda victory, a defeat that might well have stopped " Barbarossa" altogether and brought the " run" of German victories to a dead halt
    War over for Germany on the spot

  • @fullthrottle2008
    @fullthrottle2008 9 днів тому +1

    Great documentary. Eric “winkle” brown interviewed Goring about the Battle of Britain and Goring said it was a no score draw because the effort was directed towards the Eastern front instead 😅

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 8 днів тому +1

      Really? Even if the war against Russia didn't begin until over six months after the Battle of Britain & Sealion had been abandoned?

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 8 днів тому

      More completely ignorant BS from "fullthrottle".

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 6 днів тому +2

      Yes, Goering claiming that the Luftwaffe wasn't beaten, but was re-assigned to the East before they could achieve their victory. I can see him claiming that.
      But fact is that the depleted Luftwaffe had to switch to night bombing to stem their losses as their numerical advantage had pretty much evaporated by September 1940 and with new pilots starting to arrive from training programs in Canada and elsewhere in the Commonwealth and with UK aircraft manufacturing far ahead of German production, it was just getting worse.
      The numbers of operational aircraft over time demonstrate this. By June 1941 the Luftwaffe in total was smaller than the force they sent against Britain in July 1940. Meanwhile the RAF had more single engine fighters in Britain (with most of them Spitfires at this point) than the Luftwaffe had single engine fighters in total.
      I guess the Luftwaffe could have started the Battle of Britain all over again in June 1941 if there was no invasion of USSR, but it wouldn't have gone better than the 1940 version.

    • @fullthrottle2008
      @fullthrottle2008 6 днів тому

      @@iansneddon2956Thanks for that analysis -he seemed a bit of a character! (prob an understatement)

  • @paulbromley6687
    @paulbromley6687 12 днів тому +1

    When you can’t gain overall air superiority and you know your main enemy is behind you you rethink your priorities and go for your nemesis .

  • @jeffyoung60
    @jeffyoung60 26 днів тому +29

    I blame the emotional, obstinate French. They were willing to allow the entire French Navy to fall into the hands of the Germans rather than join their English Allies to continue the fight. Is this what counts for Gallic reasoning? As a result the French harbored a bitter grudge against Britain for the next four years. The French largely swallowed their grudge when the Americans joined the war and became the dominant partner in the alliance because of the vast size of the American contribution. Hence the liberated French and resurrected French Army were willing to join the alliance and cooperate. But it was clear the small French Army would be the junior partner. The once 600,000 man French Military with its thousands of tanks of 1940 was no more.

    • @iansneddon2956
      @iansneddon2956 25 днів тому +5

      They wanted to preserve Vichy independence, such as it was, and didn't want to hand over ships to be used against the Germans as this might invite reprisals.
      The British gave the French a number of options which included them steaming their navy to stay at a French colony in the Caribbean (far from the Germans), park them in British ports where they would be held and not used and the British would compensate them for damage, or steam the ships to New York and park them there. What the French admiral communicated to his superiors was "The British demand we hand over our ships or they will sink them" and then the fight started.
      Give the French some credit. The British doubted the French promise that they would scuttle their ships rather than allow the Germans to seize them. The Germans did eventually try to seize the French Navy ships in Toulon, and the French scuttled them first. A total of 77 vessels destroyed by the French.
      Of course this was a waste. If they had been sent to Algiers instead they could have been used by the Free French. It would have given de Gaulle more bargaining power in influencing Allied plans.

    • @peterkiviat9969
      @peterkiviat9969 19 днів тому +7

      The French committed the consumate military mistake. If you fight the next war, identically as you fought the last one, you lose.

    • @gameofpawns2264
      @gameofpawns2264 13 днів тому

      Because both nations were bitter rivals from the colonial days.

    • @lepersonnage371
      @lepersonnage371 12 днів тому

      T Even after Britain was bombing Germany for 8 days, Germany was offering peace all this time, and only after the 8th day the order was issued. AH even excluded people from the party for wanting to strike back at Britain before that.

    • @XXXTENTAClON227
      @XXXTENTAClON227 11 днів тому +2

      I couldn’t disagree more but I’m going to like because they call us Perfidious Albion so it’s their turn for irrational name calling

  • @berserker4940
    @berserker4940 20 днів тому +27

    Now London is not British anymore

    • @Pongle1234
      @Pongle1234 16 днів тому

      It's a Roman city

    • @skillfuldabest
      @skillfuldabest 15 днів тому +3

      @@Pongle1234 And it's populated with foreigners.

    • @dantevxv1501
      @dantevxv1501 15 днів тому +6

      AH said in 1930 Paris would be a black city in 100 years if europeans didnt stand up to the small hat banking kabbalists, i get the feeling a lot of old men wish they were speaking german now.

    • @mrmajeika6101
      @mrmajeika6101 15 днів тому

      @@skillfuldabest Yes the Anglo-Saxons

    • @skillfuldabest
      @skillfuldabest 15 днів тому

      @@mrmajeika6101 46% of Londoners are Black and Minority Ethnic, compared to 14% of England as a whole. West London has the highest proportion (53%) of its population that are Black and Minority Ethnic, followed by East London (50%).

  • @fxtblues
    @fxtblues 7 днів тому

    Bloody wonderful video

  • @gavinmcguire9801
    @gavinmcguire9801 18 днів тому +2

    Constant background music is very irritating.

  • @TheLeadSled
    @TheLeadSled 10 днів тому +4

    They abandoned their plans because they could not secure the air, the Luftwaffe got their butts handed to them by the Brits.

    • @EQOAnostalgia
      @EQOAnostalgia 9 днів тому

      lol no

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 9 днів тому

      @@EQOAnostalgia The Germans lost the Battle of Britain, and never had the slightest hope of crossing the Channel in the face of British naval supremacy in any case.

    • @peternagy-im4be
      @peternagy-im4be 8 днів тому

      ​@@dovetonsturdee7033Dads army were waiting just in case. Armed with pitchforks a match for anyone.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 8 днів тому

      @@peternagy-im4be Unfortunately, the TV series paints a completely false picture. Except in the very early days, the Home Guard was reasonably well equipped with small arms, although lacking in artillery and transport.
      The intention was that the men (many of whom were veterans of the WW1 trenches) would operate in co-operation with regular troops, using their good knowledge of their local highways and byways.

    • @photosbyjb007
      @photosbyjb007 3 дні тому

      The final story was that the Germans where beaten😂