I want my dinosaur to be a mix of both with the Jurassic park aesthetic but with paleo accuracy too just make them recognizable to easily identifiable to their respective species
It was ok for Skull Island because those dinos were separated from the rest of the world and evolved differently from all other animals. JP's dinos becoming monsters sounds like they went through a sudden mutation.
To be honest, we grew up with the Jurassic Park version of the dinosaurs. The correct version would be OK if it didn't completely alter all the house we already know. The Tyrannosaurus rex, however, stays the same the same with the Raptors .... and maybe change the pteranodon back to the Jurassic Park three version
@@rhedosaurus2251 yeah, I think most people ignore that the dilophosaurus was really the only actual inaccurate animal while everything else either had a different name or was oversized or just accurate for the time
@@rhedosaurus2251 that applies to almost all the animals in the older movies Dilo was just made the way it was for horror reasons, spino was simply thought to have looked like that based on little knowledge they had, it isn't inaccurate for that time if that's all they knew about it.
The novels had a heavy touch of horror. While the movies are good, it cannot be denied how good the horror inspired scenes were. Dino Horror is good horror. Imma need a horror heavy dino thriller
@@DangerVille I agree, Jurassic Park content will always be great but it’s nice to talk about some lesser discussed dinosaur media like these classics.
We've already seen that regular audience members that know nothing about dinosaurs are getting confused as to whether the new dinos being introduced in the newer films are real or fictional hybrids. It would be a major blow to science education if the dinosaurs became even MORE inaccurate and monstrous as people wouldn't know what's real and what's fictional.
Well considering they mention in the movies who the hybrids are, I am pretty sure people won’t get confused. You can also search it up. Google is free :)
@@misterinsanity6980 You forget how poor media literacy is in the US. A lot of people have a hard time telling fiction from reality in science fiction, and their tendency to get emotionally attached to things means there's a good chance they'll reject accurate science because it doesn't match up to their favorite show, which is _not_ a good thing.
@@misterinsanity6980 Except that the general movie-going public does use Jurassic movies as a benchmark for what dinosaurs are like. The only reason that most people today know that dinosaurs aren't slow, tail-dragging, swamp-bound evolutionary failures is because Jurassic Park showed them as fast and dynamic animals. And so they took that film as gospel truth. Just look at how often T. rex and Velociraptor are depicted in other media virtually identical to those used in the Jurassic movies.
@@patrick_j_lee That still doesn't give the Jurassic franchise any obligation to be 100% accurate. No piece of Paleo-Media will ever be accurate. We're learning new things and we're still debating old things. No piece of fictional media needs to bend over backwards to incorporate every bit of news. It's not practical, it's asinine . Also we live in a day and age were most people who aren't interested in dinosaurs know generally know more know than years before. Dinosaurs having feathers and that birds ARE dinosaurs being mainstream ideas are not (solely) because of Jurassic Park. It's thanks to things like parents watching shows like Dinosaur Train with their kids, other fictional/ educational media (games, comics, manga, etc.) introducing new findings into their designs, and youtube channels dedicated to zoology and paleontology making sure such info makes it to people home page. The people that don't care what the facts are about anything they see in in film, never will. But for the people that do care, they have other media to go to. So please, chill out.
I think there’s some potential for good meta-commentary about real vs commercialized dinosaurs in a Jurassic movie that takes a more realistic tack on new dino designs. The World movies already opened this door by having Wu confirm that they engineered their dinos to be more marketable and less natural. What if a competitor decided to clone “natural” dinosaurs with the hope of offering a more “realistic” experience? Creatures closer to actual dino behavior can provide whole new challenges and threats. And the narrative can make room for both types of dinosaur in the Jurassic universe while offering up some clever dialogue about how corporate greed ruins nature.
Keep the dinosaurs and plot simple like Jurassic Park! No monsters or hybrids. Focus on suspense and people, that will be good enough. Just old school thrills please!
David keep who wrote jp 1 and 2 is doing this one and Gareth is a good director he understands Jurassic park well and his style could realy work , you can get a good idea of his monster films like godzilla or monsters , I have hope
@@NM-ue8on Star Wars 7 had the writer from SW 5 and 6. Abrams is a good director until he lost his sense. Anything can happen, it's not 100% certain that it will be better than the last ones.
Here's the thing: the Dinosaurs from 1993's "JURASSIC PARK" are not accurate but they WERE accurate. These Dinosaurs were accurate to the real thing in the 1990s.
I’m excited for this one but I rather the dinos be more accurate. The Jurassic franchise is the reason Hollywood is scared to do a dinosaur movie other than movies like 65. If it has that much power then it also has a responsibility.
If this is true If they gonna be fully fictional species (like Malusaurus and Excavaraptor were supposed to be) its fine But if they gonna say its suppose to be irl animals (like with Baryonyx, Giganotosaurus etc.)
I feel like realistic or Jurassic Park inspired designs are missing from modern day films It’s funny how Jurassic World has more inaccurate dinos that what they had in the original trilogy.
JP franchise is the most popular Dinosaur media. When people think of dinosaurs, people think Jurassic Park. That's why I hope the dinos in the new movie will be more scientifically accurate to educate the non dino fans eventhough I don't mind a more monster looking design The frog dna thingy is not an excuse for inacurate desogn
As cool as accurate dinosaurs are, they simply would not work in the JP universe whatsoever and kind of downgrade the franchise As firstly accurate dinosaurs would just go against the franchise’s lore and the entire point of the movie, and accurate dinosaurs also don’t really have the cinematic flare the monstrous versions do Also JP isn’t meant to be educational, it’s meant to be an action/horror series about dinosaurs ripping people apart and roaming around a park
@@Lalaloopsies_United The dinosaurs look like that in the first film are not because they are lab created, but because that's how we knew the dinosaurs looked like back in the 90s, which is why I said the frog DNA thing is not an excuse for inaccurate dinosaurs
@@UMIF001 yes it is actually, if you mix frog DNA with dinosaur DNA it’s not gonna be full dinosaur and it’s gonna look unusual and not accurate That’s like reviving the Mammoth but you add Alligator DNA to its genes to fill in the gaps, so yes inaccuracy does have an excuse
In the previous video, I posted my comment and I don’t think the rumour saying Jurassic World 4’s designs will be like those in Peter Jackson’s King Kong, I think it meant more like the feeling and presence. I’m pretty sure Jurassic World 4 will give that eerie, lost world and primordial feeling where the fiercest and most terrifying creatures beyond your wildest imaginations meet up in the flesh. I think besides King Kong, I think this movie might actually Steve Blackley’s unreleased Jurassic World game. What do you think?
After reading the unused script for “Jurassic Park 4” from back in the day, I feel like they might take ideas from that or the Trespasser video game. Just my opinion
I'd like for them to maybe incorporate some dinosaur changes, based on paleontological discoveries over the last two decades, in ways that enhance the film. For example, the Tyrannosaurus in this film could be shown to have extremely keen senses of sight and scent (Imagine a scene where they hear a Tyrannosaurus roar echoing from a couple of miles away and a more knowledgeable character freezes up before fearfully stating that if they were close enough to hear it, it already knows where they are) and could be shown attempting ambush attacks at night. And of course, we could have a large Dilophosaurus. I'd say they could explain it in-universe by either implying that purer dinosaur DNA had been acquired at a certain point after JP's downfall or that different animal DNA was used to fill in the gaps.
Well, my original theory of the Dinosaurs resembling the real things as they aged went out the window when Dominion reverted Rexy's look towards JP instead of keeping the smoother, less exaggerated JW head.
I like the idea of having an underground lab doing crazy dinosaur experiments and creating even crazier mutants than Wu. But let the original dinosaurs still be part of the movies, they are just to iconic!
I think the series can benefit from a few new feathered species, and even redesigned a few established ones. At the moment, most of the new dino species look like retro-looking Skull Island species like the hybrids, the Giga, Allosaurus, Baryonyx and Sinoceratops. Instead, Imagine the classic InGen Velociraptors with a fine coat of eagle-like feathers, or a slender and semi-aquatic Spinosaurus.
Now I'm wondering what the results would be if they started fresh by taking the original story from Jurassic Park the novel and combining it with our modern understanding of the dinosaurs featured. (They'd probably have to replace Velociraptor with Deinonychus or even Utahraptor, but still...) I doubt a reboot like that would ever be undertaken, but it would be interesting to conceptualize.
I can understand originally they may have thought the the jp movies wouldn't have been as popular if they hadnt tried to make the dinos more realistic but it would have made sense to have them be more mutant at first since they were filling dna gaps with modern animal dna and they progressively got more realistic over the series as the technology advanced.
Thing is that even this "accuracy" debate does not make any sense at all. The dinosaurs CANNOT look like the real ones since they don't have the complete genome!
I really just wish they made accurate designs. It just pains me inside a bit when someone who says they love dinosaurs draws or describes them like they are in jurassic world. Especially when they act like dinosaurs are bloodthirsty monsters and not just regular animals
to be honest i would love both even tough I think you can´t have both monsterous and accurate dinosaurs in the same movie it would be cool to have one more based on accurate and one with monster like dinosaurs.
Now for me I don't care if they keep same look or go the paleo route but what I would like to see is interactions between dinos like we saw in dominion with the giga and rex with the deer you know
I prefer mostly accurate dinosaurs over completely accurate. Think a mid point between the JP trilogy style and full accuracy. I think my breaking point for JW inaccuracy was a bit before Dimorphodon, Ankylosaurus maybe a few others. So nothing good is coming out of pushing this monsterization further, for me at least.
Tbh I will support feathered dinosaurs, as long as they don’t redesign previous dinosaurs and make them fully accurate, and I don’t want accuracy to be the movie’s main focus, ngl people who want an accurate JW movie are either not true JW fans or don’t even watch the movies
@@GODZILLA_KAIJUCLYSM that’s not true whatsoever. And when you put into perspective how the designs were created for the first film in 1993, you’ll understand just how different it is from 65.
I think this is the right choice (mostly) we’re 6 movies 2 TV shows in so for them going for accurate dinosaurs is only going to be good until 5 years from now cause we’re always learning stuff that changes how we see them I mean look at Spinosaurus-
You might be right. There was a time when the JP dinos were relatively accurate. But since time passed they use the excuse they obviously never looked like that.
I never cared if Jurassic parks dinosaurs were accurate. I keep in mind that the scientists had to fill in the gaps of the dna with other things so could they have even made them accurate?(if Jurassic park was real)
my ideas for this movie: - a new cloning company founded by Dr. Wu in secret - more dinos created from dna found elsewhere around the world - old dinos from the previous movies got recaptured - hopefully, the character return of Nick Owen and Sarah Harding
Honestly, just go with a mixture of the realistic interpretation and mix it with some other attributes from different animals like what they did with the dilophosaurus. It's not accurate, but you can recognize it as Dilophosaurus. That's what I've wanted from this series. Don't make monster's, just make dinosaur's that's both realistic and scary and awesome. I mean look at Therizinosaurus, that thing didn't look accurate but at least everyone recognized it.
I wish they would make a Jurassic park show like primeval that would be amazing. A show completely about rounding up dinosaurs like a live action dinosaur ranger show. And it would be cool if they tried to save the normal dinosaurs and put down the monstrous dinosaurs. That would be an amazing show in my opinion.
They should have a balance of making them a bit more accurate while still keeping the Jurassic Park/World aesthetic, similar to what they did with some of the creatures in Dominion (like the Therizinosaurus).
Feathered dinosaurs are fine in the JW franchise, but there’s two things I don’t want the movie to do, and that’s to redesign all the dinosaurs to make them all scientifically accurate or to add in any fully accurate dinosaurs into the movie
I wouldn't say the Therizinosaurus fits the JP aesthetic very well, nor is it scientifically accurate (and before any pendants reply, I'm aware that most "accurate" Therizinosaurus reconstructions are based on its more complete relatives). If anything, it looks like Schleich's Therizinosaurus toy. I would've preferred something more like the one from the Jurassic Park Institute book.
Peter Jackson's King Kong dinosaurs are incredibly beautiful! And if they're not scientifically accurate so what!?!? XD The dinosaurs in Jurassic Park/World aren't accurate either! XD Nobody cares about that as long as it's cool and epic! If this is true, I am excited!!! lml 😃
for me, i think they could compromise and make dinosaurs that are mostly realistic looking but, with a few embellishments to their design just to give the movie more visual effect, if that make sense. for example, take a T-Rex and give it a few extra dorsal bumps and spines and make it look like it's wearing a bone-style armor or something. that's just me, though.
I remember hearing that they started filming the movie in Thailand ( I think. idk where I just heard it from a friend of mine) and I thought sweet and when I went to bed that night, I've a dream about what the new Jurassic world movie villain will be and in my dream, the villains were the Siamo gang, made out of Siamosaurus, Siamotyrannus ( Not a Tyrannosaur at all) Siamodon ( The only herbivore in the group) and Siamraptor (the leader of the group) . They are considerd serial killers because they were once owned by a circus and they were mistreated and Siamodon even lost an eye because the circus owner poke it out when it fail to do a trick that seems way to impossible for an animal. They were really smart animals and there intelligence were compare to dolphins and they were smart enough to hold grudges so one day while they were practicing, they attack and killed almost everyone except for for people . They started hunting people because they hated people for what they did and they left Siamodon alive in the group just out of spite. Only Siamraptor died because during the climax of the movie, the protagonist fight with them, Siamosaurus, Siamotyrannus and Siamodon ran away but Siamraptor fought on and the protagonist ran away, Siamraptor followed them and when they ran into a road, they saw a truck coming so they jumped away but Siamraptor didn't jumped away and got hit by the truck and the truck hit crached into a tree which pins Siamraptor between the tree and the truck and Siamraptor dies. I don't what happened to the others since before I see what happened to them, I woke up and I was pissed because I want to know more and it's the only dream I've had which isn't utter madness.
I feel like one of the issues is that every time we introduce a newest deadliest dinosaur, it's no deadlier than the trex. The first jurrasic world movie was really the only one that delivered on presenting something that felt truly more menacing. I don't think new concept designs for the dinosaurs or new dinosaurs entirely is necessarily the answer for revving the series. I think what we need is a new concept. A plot that stands apart from the other films. One direction I've been waiting for them to go in is to capitalize on something they've been teasing for a while. Using the Dinos for warfare. That would be so awesome! Seeing maybe indo raptors used for actual combat instead of just chasing people would be a breath of fresh air and something new. Or maybe someone starts an underground Dino fighting pit or something. I also think it could be interesting to add Stone Age mammals to the series. Perhaps the smilodon, mammoth, or short faced bear could be interesting as well. They tried playing around with a few new animals other than just dinosaurs in the latest edition, and while Jurassic world dominion wasn't the greatest, I think the inclusion of other prehistoric animals was a step in the right direction. Anyway that's my rant
Im pretty sure in some novel or game or movie from jurassic world/park they said wu or other scientists add things to make them look unacurate or something
They could make more real dinosaurs like let’s say the modern interpretation of the t-rex and say it is a newly made subject that has more tyrannosaurus dna in it because it had lest genome gaps so less frog or lizard or whatever dna was added to the genetic code. So it would still be a Jurassic park t-rex, with the whole being brought back from extinction, but would look different than Rexy, Buck and Doe. And could possibly interbreed with the Ingen rexes!
Maybe this new film can make the dinosaurs scary again other than "dinosaur shows up and characters escape unscaved, end scene" and then again and again and again. I mean with the cast already set I'm a bit worried for this to happen again cause highly doubt we'll see any dinosaur carnage other than dino v dino. But hopefully I'm wrong and hope these designs of the dinosaurs look cool and unique although Jurassic already has its unique designs already. But I have hope with this new movie and can't wait to see more news on it.
As much to say about the dinosaurs designs, I always liked the Jurassic Park designs. But I kinda wanna mixed it with both Monster version and Paleontologist accurate version, to make it settled for the dinosaurs. But I wanna see more different dinosaurs in the franchises to be seen. But I really do wished if they could changed the Tyrannosaurus Rex becoming more like how the scientists described it that was intelligent, perfect visual eye sight, very strong bite force, and that it mentioned it can swim. So it woukd be the "King/Queen of all Dinosaurs" instead of getting their ass kicked like a punching bag and kept losing in fights.
In Jurassic Park 3, as the designs of the original JP had already become dated by 2001, there is a scene where Alan Grant does actually say that "The dinosaurs of Jurassic Park were theme park monsters, nothing more and nothing less" . This is quite possibly the most important line in the entire franchise as it acknowledges self awareness and meta criticism on screen already then. Since this movie sounds more or less like a JP3 rip off based on the information we have so far, this storyline COULD actually make sense. Gareth Edwards Godzilla was very dark and realistic compared to the other films in the franchise, so this would basically be a darker, more grim version of JP3.
Considering that the movies have already steared clear from accuracy (almost) alltogether, im not suprised they would make the dinosaurs basically dragons
Jurassic Park’s genetic manipulation may have made the dinosaurs looked the way they do if they do past scenes, they could try to make the dinosaurs look more realistic like when the dinosaurs were around realistic dinosaurs done documentaries so that we know what they theoretically should look like or new upcoming dinosaur movies Can have them realistic.
All the fake news going around Twitter makes it extremely hard to find really News on the future movie. I can’t wait to see what this film will give us, especially with the new cast such as Scarlet Johansson.
DNA is spread all over the world. Maybe amatuers are trying to create there own dinosaurs. But since they arent masters of cloning, they failed and created monsters. At least its still worldbuilding. Hopefully things from past films get a tiny bit mentioned.
Do you want the dinosaurs to look the same, look more like monsters, or more like the real thing?
Realistic and first
More like the real thing
Saurophaganax
Realistic or the same
😅
I want my dinosaur to be a mix of both with the Jurassic park aesthetic but with paleo accuracy too
just make them recognizable to easily identifiable to their respective species
I can agree 100% with that. From that, I'm imagining the T-rex from the prehistoric planet, but with the redish brown color scheme from the novels.
Basically what evolution 2 did
@@Smellie_Buddywdym?
@@SuperiorLad4411 Jurassic World Evolution in its dlcs added some accurate dinos with some modifications being more JW style, but are still accurate
@@Smellie_Buddy they didn't make the t rex look realistic tho
It was ok for Skull Island because those dinos were separated from the rest of the world and evolved differently from all other animals. JP's dinos becoming monsters sounds like they went through a sudden mutation.
Or genetically altered into monsters by Biosyn or a different company
To be honest, we grew up with the Jurassic Park version of the dinosaurs. The correct version would be OK if it didn't completely alter all the house we already know.
The Tyrannosaurus rex, however, stays the same the same with the Raptors .... and maybe change the pteranodon back to the Jurassic Park three version
Hi
They are all hybrids.
It’s just as Alan Grant said in JP3:
“Jurassic Park makes monsters, not dinosaurs.”
Except that Stan Winston Studios took great pains to make most of the dinosaurs as accurate as possible.
Well…yeah.
I just really love that quote.
But you’re right.
@@rhedosaurus2251 yeah, I think most people ignore that the dilophosaurus was really the only actual inaccurate animal while everything else either had a different name or was oversized or just accurate for the time
@@Mr.Wetherilli We can throw in the JP3 Spino in the 'inaccurate for the time' slot as well since that was just a guess based on iffy science.
@@rhedosaurus2251 that applies to almost all the animals in the older movies
Dilo was just made the way it was for horror reasons, spino was simply thought to have looked like that based on little knowledge they had, it isn't inaccurate for that time if that's all they knew about it.
Honestly realistic dinosaurs can be just as scary if portrayed correctly
true
Yes I agree Primitive War handled this concept perfectly
Ye
Analog dinosaur horror videos
Scary? Yes
Cinematic? No
The novels had a heavy touch of horror. While the movies are good, it cannot be denied how good the horror inspired scenes were. Dino Horror is good horror. Imma need a horror heavy dino thriller
Agree 1000%. Need a good dark Jurassic film!
Yeah
Realistic dinosaurs are actually more scary if they play with the whole predatory nature of theirs
The sounds the T-Rex probably made are literally horror movie material
Take a look at BEASTOPIA's JP vs Real Life T rex Comparison animation - ua-cam.com/video/jBMVJhX24is/v-deo.htmlsi=g6Lw9vCDg7zqD_EG
Nice.
Cool.
Neato
Suggestions: videos talking about some older dinosaur video games, such as Primal Rage, Dino Crisis, Turok and the old JP games
We’d love that, all those games are epic.
@@DangerVille I agree, Jurassic Park content will always be great but it’s nice to talk about some lesser discussed dinosaur media like these classics.
We've already seen that regular audience members that know nothing about dinosaurs are getting confused as to whether the new dinos being introduced in the newer films are real or fictional hybrids. It would be a major blow to science education if the dinosaurs became even MORE inaccurate and monstrous as people wouldn't know what's real and what's fictional.
Well considering they mention in the movies who the hybrids are, I am pretty sure people won’t get confused. You can also search it up. Google is free :)
Its also a movie, not a documentary. No blow will happen to science education. You are being overly dramatcic
@@misterinsanity6980 You forget how poor media literacy is in the US. A lot of people have a hard time telling fiction from reality in science fiction, and their tendency to get emotionally attached to things means there's a good chance they'll reject accurate science because it doesn't match up to their favorite show, which is _not_ a good thing.
@@misterinsanity6980 Except that the general movie-going public does use Jurassic movies as a benchmark for what dinosaurs are like. The only reason that most people today know that dinosaurs aren't slow, tail-dragging, swamp-bound evolutionary failures is because Jurassic Park showed them as fast and dynamic animals. And so they took that film as gospel truth. Just look at how often T. rex and Velociraptor are depicted in other media virtually identical to those used in the Jurassic movies.
@@patrick_j_lee That still doesn't give the Jurassic franchise any obligation to be 100% accurate. No piece of Paleo-Media will ever be accurate. We're learning new things and we're still debating old things. No piece of fictional media needs to bend over backwards to incorporate every bit of news. It's not practical, it's asinine . Also we live in a day and age were most people who aren't interested in dinosaurs know generally know more know than years before. Dinosaurs having feathers and that birds ARE dinosaurs being mainstream ideas are not (solely) because of Jurassic Park. It's thanks to things like parents watching shows like Dinosaur Train with their kids, other fictional/ educational media (games, comics, manga, etc.) introducing new findings into their designs, and youtube channels dedicated to zoology and paleontology making sure such info makes it to people home page. The people that don't care what the facts are about anything they see in in film, never will. But for the people that do care, they have other media to go to. So please, chill out.
BryceNator100 has always been a questionable figure among the JP community. I would really doubt that they would be going in this direction.
Filmcore also did a what if the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park/World were accurate, and he actually animated them into the scenes from the movies.
Just give me a horror JP movie like the actual books! So sick of the watered down versions.
I mean minus one managed too make a cgi shot so realistic that many people mistake it for a practical effect
Cause it was practical
@@Averagegodzillastan wasnt just good cgi
Godzilla Minus One influenced me to come up with a Jurassic Park reboot called “Jurassic Park Era One”, which will have a more novel accurate plot
@@Averagegodzillastan nope, the creators confirmed it was cgi
I think there’s some potential for good meta-commentary about real vs commercialized dinosaurs in a Jurassic movie that takes a more realistic tack on new dino designs. The World movies already opened this door by having Wu confirm that they engineered their dinos to be more marketable and less natural.
What if a competitor decided to clone “natural” dinosaurs with the hope of offering a more “realistic” experience? Creatures closer to actual dino behavior can provide whole new challenges and threats. And the narrative can make room for both types of dinosaur in the Jurassic universe while offering up some clever dialogue about how corporate greed ruins nature.
Keep the dinosaurs and plot simple like Jurassic Park! No monsters or hybrids. Focus on suspense and people, that will be good enough. Just old school thrills please!
I do hope the next Jurassic World movie will be good since I don’t want the next trilogy to be like Disney Star Wars trilogy
David keep who wrote jp 1 and 2 is doing this one and Gareth is a good director he understands Jurassic park well and his style could realy work , you can get a good idea of his monster films like godzilla or monsters , I have hope
@@NM-ue8on Star Wars 7 had the writer from SW 5 and 6.
Abrams is a good director until he lost his sense.
Anything can happen, it's not 100% certain that it will be better than the last ones.
the JW trilogy already is as a SW sequel
@@destroyerzilla7634the Jurassic World trilogy was better than Disney Star Wars and episode 7 was a remake of a new hope
I would like to see the Stan Winston style back into the franchise. That’s what made the animals look real in the first place
Here's the thing: the Dinosaurs from 1993's "JURASSIC PARK" are not accurate but they WERE accurate. These Dinosaurs were accurate to the real thing in the 1990s.
I’m excited for this one but I rather the dinos be more accurate. The Jurassic franchise is the reason Hollywood is scared to do a dinosaur movie other than movies like 65. If it has that much power then it also has a responsibility.
If this is true
If they gonna be fully fictional species (like Malusaurus and Excavaraptor were supposed to be) its fine
But if they gonna say its suppose to be irl animals (like with Baryonyx, Giganotosaurus etc.)
We need another hybrid but massive and able to show a heavy fear factor
I feel like realistic or Jurassic Park inspired designs are missing from modern day films
It’s funny how Jurassic World has more inaccurate dinos that what they had in the original trilogy.
JP franchise is the most popular Dinosaur media. When people think of dinosaurs, people think Jurassic Park. That's why I hope the dinos in the new movie will be more scientifically accurate to educate the non dino fans eventhough I don't mind a more monster looking design
The frog dna thingy is not an excuse for inacurate desogn
You make a very valid point.
As cool as accurate dinosaurs are, they simply would not work in the JP universe whatsoever and kind of downgrade the franchise
As firstly accurate dinosaurs would just go against the franchise’s lore and the entire point of the movie, and accurate dinosaurs also don’t really have the cinematic flare the monstrous versions do
Also JP isn’t meant to be educational, it’s meant to be an action/horror series about dinosaurs ripping people apart and roaming around a park
@@Lalaloopsies_United The dinosaurs look like that in the first film are not because they are lab created, but because that's how we knew the dinosaurs looked like back in the 90s, which is why I said the frog DNA thing is not an excuse for inaccurate dinosaurs
But accurate dinosaurs don’t look cool and that’s the reason why me and the other none dino fan people watch it
@@UMIF001 yes it is actually, if you mix frog DNA with dinosaur DNA it’s not gonna be full dinosaur and it’s gonna look unusual and not accurate
That’s like reviving the Mammoth but you add Alligator DNA to its genes to fill in the gaps, so yes inaccuracy does have an excuse
In the previous video, I posted my comment and I don’t think the rumour saying Jurassic World 4’s designs will be like those in Peter Jackson’s King Kong, I think it meant more like the feeling and presence. I’m pretty sure Jurassic World 4 will give that eerie, lost world and primordial feeling where the fiercest and most terrifying creatures beyond your wildest imaginations meet up in the flesh. I think besides King Kong, I think this movie might actually Steve Blackley’s unreleased Jurassic World game. What do you think?
Yeah they mentioned tone and also the dinosaur designs, but it’s still early days so things can change.
After reading the unused script for “Jurassic Park 4” from back in the day, I feel like they might take ideas from that or the Trespasser video game. Just my opinion
I'd like for them to maybe incorporate some dinosaur changes, based on paleontological discoveries over the last two decades, in ways that enhance the film. For example, the Tyrannosaurus in this film could be shown to have extremely keen senses of sight and scent (Imagine a scene where they hear a Tyrannosaurus roar echoing from a couple of miles away and a more knowledgeable character freezes up before fearfully stating that if they were close enough to hear it, it already knows where they are) and could be shown attempting ambush attacks at night. And of course, we could have a large Dilophosaurus.
I'd say they could explain it in-universe by either implying that purer dinosaur DNA had been acquired at a certain point after JP's downfall or that different animal DNA was used to fill in the gaps.
Well, my original theory of the Dinosaurs resembling the real things as they aged went out the window when Dominion reverted Rexy's look towards JP instead of keeping the smoother, less exaggerated JW head.
I love jurassic park please continue making more vids❤🦖🦕
I like the idea of having an underground lab doing crazy dinosaur experiments and creating even crazier mutants than Wu. But let the original dinosaurs still be part of the movies, they are just to iconic!
What I want:
Robo Godzilla, but smoller
I think the series can benefit from a few new feathered species, and even redesigned a few established ones. At the moment, most of the new dino species look like retro-looking Skull Island species like the hybrids, the Giga, Allosaurus, Baryonyx and Sinoceratops. Instead, Imagine the classic InGen Velociraptors with a fine coat of eagle-like feathers, or a slender and semi-aquatic Spinosaurus.
Sounds like this new film is going for a more horror based vibe like the novels
I like the feels with the dinos though. It's my favorite part besides the carnage. Fights have been last since they were somewhat lackluster lately.
I saw that other clip featuring some Mex Mayan ruins. That looked quite promising 👍
Now I'm wondering what the results would be if they started fresh by taking the original story from Jurassic Park the novel and combining it with our modern understanding of the dinosaurs featured. (They'd probably have to replace Velociraptor with Deinonychus or even Utahraptor, but still...)
I doubt a reboot like that would ever be undertaken, but it would be interesting to conceptualize.
I watched the Beasttopia video when it came out! I was so hyped!
I really like how in the comparison between reality and movie, T-rex goes from "hefty chonk" to "Oh lawd, he comin!".
I can understand originally they may have thought the the jp movies wouldn't have been as popular if they hadnt tried to make the dinos more realistic but it would have made sense to have them be more mutant at first since they were filling dna gaps with modern animal dna and they progressively got more realistic over the series as the technology advanced.
I would just love to see Rexy or a JP Rex be able to crush anything from a large bone or theropod arm with its mouth.
Also, question: what software are all you Jurassic creators using to get those 3D renderings of shots from the movies? It’s really cool.
I want the dinosaurs look like monsters while retaining some accuracies so that they are still recognizable.
I lowkey wish the new movie would be a reboot this franchise really needs it after dominion
Seems to be a soft reset of the franchise
@@DangerVille thats some pretty good news then, I hope they manage to pull it off well 🙏
Thing is that even this "accuracy" debate does not make any sense at all.
The dinosaurs CANNOT look like the real ones since they don't have the complete genome!
I really just wish they made accurate designs. It just pains me inside a bit when someone who says they love dinosaurs draws or describes them like they are in jurassic world. Especially when they act like dinosaurs are bloodthirsty monsters and not just regular animals
Imagine if the cast met a realistic spino, just chilling, and when it sees the main cast, it just does not care about them😂
to be honest i would love both even tough I think you can´t have both monsterous and accurate dinosaurs in the same movie it would be cool to have one more based on accurate and one with monster like dinosaurs.
I’d be fine if they find a way to use both without one overshadowing the other
It's a fictional movie, accuracy doesn't matter> As long a sit is well written, good acting, interesting story, etc then it will be good.
They should do both
They need to bring back the spinosaurus and the baryonyx and buck and doe who's with me?
Now for me I don't care if they keep same look or go the paleo route but what I would like to see is interactions between dinos like we saw in dominion with the giga and rex with the deer you know
I would love to see some more updated and realistic dinos, especially trex
I honestly want the same dinosaurs, no change but having a new dinosaur with an interesting design would be awesome!
You talked for the guy with the phone. Right? Because I heard a familiar voice😂
NEW DINOSAURS BABY!!!!!! 😍🤩🦖🦕
I love the V-rex design so I'd have no problem with it
If this 1 isnt going to blow our minds im gonna be so pissed 😢
I prefer the horror JP aesthetic! If I want complete dino accuracy... I'll tune into discovery or some David Attenborough show.
I agree, real dinosaurs wouldn’t behave like the artificial monsters in the JP movies.
Jurassic World still continues
Love all yalls videos. Been wondering are you gonna talk about jurrasic world chaos theory on the channel. Would love to hear yalls thoughts on it
Maybe we’ll make a video on it eventually, we thought it was great.
V Rex vs rexy would be a sick battle!
I prefer mostly accurate dinosaurs over completely accurate. Think a mid point between the JP trilogy style and full accuracy. I think my breaking point for JW inaccuracy was a bit before Dimorphodon, Ankylosaurus maybe a few others. So nothing good is coming out of pushing this monsterization further, for me at least.
Tbh I will support feathered dinosaurs, as long as they don’t redesign previous dinosaurs and make them fully accurate, and I don’t want accuracy to be the movie’s main focus, ngl people who want an accurate JW movie are either not true JW fans or don’t even watch the movies
I thought the Jurrasic franchise was being rebooted with Scarlett Johansson attached for some reason?
This is a bad idea. 65 is all the proof we need.
65's dinosaurs aren't any less unrealistic than the Jurassic Park dinosaurs..
@@GODZILLA_KAIJUCLYSM that’s not true whatsoever. And when you put into perspective how the designs were created for the first film in 1993, you’ll understand just how different it is from 65.
The reason 65 was mid wasn’t because of the dinosaur designs, it was because of the plot and the undeveloped and unexplained story of the movie
I think this is the right choice (mostly) we’re 6 movies 2 TV shows in so for them going for accurate dinosaurs is only going to be good until 5 years from now cause we’re always learning stuff that changes how we see them I mean look at Spinosaurus-
You might be right. There was a time when the JP dinos were relatively accurate. But since time passed they use the excuse they obviously never looked like that.
I never cared if Jurassic parks dinosaurs were accurate.
I keep in mind that the scientists had to fill in the gaps of the dna with other things so could they have even made them accurate?(if Jurassic park was real)
my ideas for this movie:
- a new cloning company founded by Dr. Wu in secret
- more dinos created from dna found elsewhere around the world
- old dinos from the previous movies got recaptured
- hopefully, the character return of Nick Owen and Sarah Harding
Honestly, just go with a mixture of the realistic interpretation and mix it with some other attributes from different animals like what they did with the dilophosaurus.
It's not accurate, but you can recognize it as Dilophosaurus. That's what I've wanted from this series. Don't make monster's, just make dinosaur's that's both realistic and scary and awesome.
I mean look at Therizinosaurus, that thing didn't look accurate but at least everyone recognized it.
Bring back jp3 spinosaurus!
I wish they would make a Jurassic park show like primeval that would be amazing. A show completely about rounding up dinosaurs like a live action dinosaur ranger show. And it would be cool if they tried to save the normal dinosaurs and put down the monstrous dinosaurs. That would be an amazing show in my opinion.
I would be interested in doing the age of saurica
They should have a balance of making them a bit more accurate while still keeping the Jurassic Park/World aesthetic, similar to what they did with some of the creatures in Dominion (like the Therizinosaurus).
Feathered dinosaurs are fine in the JW franchise, but there’s two things I don’t want the movie to do, and that’s to redesign all the dinosaurs to make them all scientifically accurate or to add in any fully accurate dinosaurs into the movie
I wouldn't say the Therizinosaurus fits the JP aesthetic very well, nor is it scientifically accurate (and before any pendants reply, I'm aware that most "accurate" Therizinosaurus reconstructions are based on its more complete relatives). If anything, it looks like Schleich's Therizinosaurus toy. I would've preferred something more like the one from the Jurassic Park Institute book.
Peter Jackson's King Kong dinosaurs are incredibly beautiful! And if they're not scientifically accurate so what!?!? XD The dinosaurs in Jurassic Park/World aren't accurate either! XD Nobody cares about that as long as it's cool and epic! If this is true, I am excited!!! lml 😃
I always chalked the dinosaurs not looking accurate up to ingen taking liberties with their DNA to make them more entertaining to look at.
Ain't no way that you called Rexy a “HE”. 💀
for me, i think they could compromise and make dinosaurs that are mostly realistic looking but, with a few embellishments to their design just to give the movie more visual effect, if that make sense. for example, take a T-Rex and give it a few extra dorsal bumps and spines and make it look like it's wearing a bone-style armor or something. that's just me, though.
I remember hearing that they started filming the movie in Thailand ( I think. idk where I just heard it from a friend of mine) and I thought sweet and when I went to bed that night, I've a dream about what the new Jurassic world movie villain will be and in my dream, the villains were the Siamo gang, made out of Siamosaurus, Siamotyrannus ( Not a Tyrannosaur at all) Siamodon ( The only herbivore in the group) and Siamraptor (the leader of the group) . They are considerd serial killers because they were once owned by a circus and they were mistreated and Siamodon even lost an eye because the circus owner poke it out when it fail to do a trick that seems way to impossible for an animal. They were really smart animals and there intelligence were compare to dolphins and they were smart enough to hold grudges so one day while they were practicing, they attack and killed almost everyone except for for people . They started hunting people because they hated people for what they did and they left Siamodon alive in the group just out of spite. Only Siamraptor died because during the climax of the movie, the protagonist fight with them, Siamosaurus, Siamotyrannus and Siamodon ran away but Siamraptor fought on and the protagonist ran away, Siamraptor followed them and when they ran into a road, they saw a truck coming so they jumped away but Siamraptor didn't jumped away and got hit by the truck and the truck hit crached into a tree which pins Siamraptor between the tree and the truck and Siamraptor dies. I don't what happened to the others since before I see what happened to them, I woke up and I was pissed because I want to know more and it's the only dream I've had which isn't utter madness.
I feel like one of the issues is that every time we introduce a newest deadliest dinosaur, it's no deadlier than the trex. The first jurrasic world movie was really the only one that delivered on presenting something that felt truly more menacing. I don't think new concept designs for the dinosaurs or new dinosaurs entirely is necessarily the answer for revving the series. I think what we need is a new concept. A plot that stands apart from the other films. One direction I've been waiting for them to go in is to capitalize on something they've been teasing for a while. Using the Dinos for warfare. That would be so awesome! Seeing maybe indo raptors used for actual combat instead of just chasing people would be a breath of fresh air and something new. Or maybe someone starts an underground Dino fighting pit or something. I also think it could be interesting to add Stone Age mammals to the series. Perhaps the smilodon, mammoth, or short faced bear could be interesting as well. They tried playing around with a few new animals other than just dinosaurs in the latest edition, and while Jurassic world dominion wasn't the greatest, I think the inclusion of other prehistoric animals was a step in the right direction. Anyway that's my rant
Alright, Let's Goooooooooooo
Im pretty sure in some novel or game or movie from jurassic world/park they said wu or other scientists add things to make them look unacurate or something
I just want the spino to return, it gave me chills as a kid
They could make more real dinosaurs like let’s say the modern interpretation of the t-rex and say it is a newly made subject that has more tyrannosaurus dna in it because it had lest genome gaps so less frog or lizard or whatever dna was added to the genetic code. So it would still be a Jurassic park t-rex, with the whole being brought back from extinction, but would look different than Rexy, Buck and Doe. And could possibly interbreed with the Ingen rexes!
Maybe this new film can make the dinosaurs scary again other than "dinosaur shows up and characters escape unscaved, end scene" and then again and again and again. I mean with the cast already set I'm a bit worried for this to happen again cause highly doubt we'll see any dinosaur carnage other than dino v dino. But hopefully I'm wrong and hope these designs of the dinosaurs look cool and unique although Jurassic already has its unique designs already. But I have hope with this new movie and can't wait to see more news on it.
Would seem an odd decision given they want to take it back to more of og Jurassic Park style. Think the source is probably talking nonsense.
As much to say about the dinosaurs designs, I always liked the Jurassic Park designs. But I kinda wanna mixed it with both Monster version and Paleontologist accurate version, to make it settled for the dinosaurs. But I wanna see more different dinosaurs in the franchises to be seen.
But I really do wished if they could changed the Tyrannosaurus Rex becoming more like how the scientists described it that was intelligent, perfect visual eye sight, very strong bite force, and that it mentioned it can swim. So it woukd be the "King/Queen of all Dinosaurs" instead of getting their ass kicked like a punching bag and kept losing in fights.
In Jurassic Park 3, as the designs of the original JP had already become dated by 2001, there is a scene where Alan Grant does actually say that "The dinosaurs of Jurassic Park were theme park monsters, nothing more and nothing less" . This is quite possibly the most important line in the entire franchise as it acknowledges self awareness and meta criticism on screen already then.
Since this movie sounds more or less like a JP3 rip off based on the information we have so far, this storyline COULD actually make sense. Gareth Edwards Godzilla was very dark and realistic compared to the other films in the franchise, so this would basically be a darker, more grim version of JP3.
Ag. Thumbnail reminded me of The Hunter Primal. I wish they kept updating that game TwT
Maybe a realistic look with more monstrous and horrific style would be really cool
I wish they would debut some other prehistoric animals along with the dinosaurs like Titanaboa or Deinosuchus, or the Dunkleostus.
Considering that the movies have already steared clear from accuracy (almost) alltogether, im not suprised they would make the dinosaurs basically dragons
Jurassic Park’s genetic manipulation may have made the dinosaurs looked the way they do if they do past scenes, they could try to make the dinosaurs look more realistic like when the dinosaurs were around realistic dinosaurs done documentaries so that we know what they theoretically should look like or new upcoming dinosaur movies Can have them realistic.
I just got a ad about jurassic world before this video
What if they make the new star T. rex Junior! (Son of buck and doe as an adult)
When do you think we will get our first teaser trailer?
Honestly I hope it’s soon because we realy need need a good idea on how this movie looks because it’s confusing
Early next year is my guess
Let’s hope…
I hope they show Deinosuchus, bioluminescence and more horror
I want it to feel real, if they dont look real just make them feel real...i agree with you make it feel
All the fake news going around Twitter makes it extremely hard to find really News on the future movie. I can’t wait to see what this film will give us, especially with the new cast such as Scarlet Johansson.
DNA is spread all over the world. Maybe amatuers are trying to create there own dinosaurs. But since they arent masters of cloning, they failed and created monsters. At least its still worldbuilding. Hopefully things from past films get a tiny bit mentioned.
To me the best way to make monster dinosaurs is to say that they found a place with all the genetic rejects