NT Textual Studies Book Recommendations from Christian Publishing House FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS: Introduction-Intermediate to New Testament Textual Studies by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586987 Google eBooks: bit.ly/2VbIwVK THE NEW TESTAMENT DOCUMENTS: Can They Be Trusted by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/194958609X Google eBooks: [bit.ly/2YQOsnd] THE P52 PROJECT: Is P52 Really the Earliest Greek New Testament Manuscript? by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586103 Google eBooks: [bit.ly/3c3SbT3] 400,000+ SCRIBAL ERRORS IN THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT MANUSCRIPTS: What Assurance Do We Have that We Can Trust the Bible? by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586928 Google eBooks: bit.ly/2Z7ogI6 THE READING CULTURE OF EARLY CHRISTIANITY: The Production, Publication, Circulation, and Use of Books in the Early Christian Church Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586847 Google eBooks: bit.ly/2XS4J99 MISREPRESENTING JESUS: Debunking Bart D. Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" [Fourth Edition] by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586952 THE COMPLETE GUIDE to BIBLE TRANSLATION: Bible Translation Choices and Translation Principles [Second Edition] Authored by Edward D Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/0692728716 BIBLE DIFFICULTIES: How to Approach Difficulties In the Bible by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/B084DLSBZ2 THE KING JAMES BIBLE: Do You Know the King James Version? By Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/KING-JAMES-BIBLE-James-Version/dp/194575799X/ Google eBooks: tiny.cc/ioi5wy THE KING JAMES BIBLE Why Have Modern Bible Translations Removed Many Verses That Are In the King James Version? by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586960 Google eBook: bit.ly/2p3SFGn HISTORY OF ENGLISH VERSIONS OF THE BIBLE by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586979 Google eBook: bit.ly/34LxisC THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS: The Early Christian Writings of Church Leaders Who Followed Soon After the Apostles of Jesus Christ by J. B. Lightfoot www.amazon.com/dp/B0863S9V9Q THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS: The Early Christian Writings of Churchmen Who Wrote about Christianity in the Late First and Early Second Centuries by Kirsopp www.amazon.com/dp/B085DT65NN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS: Who Wrote the Book of Hebrews? by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/194958674X PAUL AND LUKE ON TRIAL: Dating Events Between 33 and 49 A.D. by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586073 BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS I AM: Two Views on Translating John 8:58 by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/B0851LLH74 JESUS CHRIST: The Great Teacher by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1949586839 THE TEACHER THE APOSTLE PAUL: What Made the Apostle Paul's Teaching, Preaching, Evangelism, and Apologetics Outstanding Effective? www.amazon.com/dp/1949586030 CONVERSATIONAL EVANGELISM, [Second Edition] by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/194575737X THE EVANGELISM HANDBOOK: How All Christians Can Effectively Share God's Word in Their Community, [SECOND EDITION], by Edward D. Andrews www.amazon.com/dp/1945757388 HOW RELIABLE ARE THE GOSPELS? by F. David Farnell www.amazon.com/dp/1949586650 IS THE QURAN THE WORD OF GOD?: Is Islam the One True Faith? www.amazon.com/dp/1945757493 THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM: What Every Christian Needs to Know About Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam www.amazon.com/dp/1949586766 MOSAIC AUTHORSHIP CONTROVERSY: Who Really Wrote the First Five Books of the Bible? www.amazon.com/dp/1949586790
Very nice, just started these. Not sure if there is a playlist or order. Is there a video that directly follows this opening and so on? Plan on watching them all, subscribed. If I'm ever in the neck of the woods ... def will stop by!
Yes, I just created one-Daniel B. Wallace Videos. Another tool you might enjoy is our two blogs, with thousands of free articles on 125+ Bible subject areas. Christian Publishing House Blog christianpublishinghouse.co/ The Updated American Standard Version Blog uasvbible.org/
14:00:00 "the next largest is two verses"?? The good Doctor needs to qualify this statement, (as well as the previous comments concerning Mark 16:9-20 & the PA,) for it's incorrect when singular readings are accounted for.
This is actually just the first lecture in a series of about 37 on this subject. I think the whole course set me back $20-$25 from Credo house, well worth it if this is your interest.
Why were the current oldest copies found by Tischendorf not put forward for all of those hundreds of years? Didn’t the people who help these Codex know what they were?
The early church was expecting the imminent return of Christ, textual criticism would have been the last thing on their minds. Who cares if you misquote Paul a little - it's the last days in you're about to be raptured. I think that's partially why you have so much variation.
I hardly think so. See the article below. Nowhere in the NT do you find a dismissive attitude such as yours. In fact, the inference would be to ignore such a person. You really need to study the history of how the Bible came down to us. See book recommendations after the free articles below. Lastly, see the article on the rapture below. The Early Christian’s View of the Integrity of the Greek New Testament Books christianpublishinghouse.co/2019/11/30/the-early-christians-view-of-the-integrity-of-the-greek-new-testament-books/ What Does the Bible Really Say About the Rapture? christianpublishinghouse.co/2016/12/13/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-rapture/ FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS: Introduction-Intermediate New Testament Textual Studies www.amazon.com/dp/1949586987 HOW WE GOT THE BIBLE www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTVJGP8B
@@williambrewer The purpose of our blogs, is not to be Facebook comments in length. We have thousands of articles on 125+ Bible subject areas, which are anywhere from 5 pages to 150 pages in length. Our mission is not to hand our nibbles that curb hunger pains. WE CAN TRY AGAIN (HERE IS ANOTHER ARTICLE): Are You Waiting for the Rapture? christianpublishinghouse.co/2016/12/13/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-rapture/ Many do not know that 95% of the 2.8 billion Christians are biblically illiterate. That is not our opinion; it comes from reputable Christian polling companies over the past 40 years. So, our mission is to educate them and win disciples at the same time.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
those are present in the textus receptus manuscript (greek)....textual criticism(nestle aland) is formed by two non protestant priest by the name of westcott and hort(1828) then revived by nestle and aland....they want to go away from 1611 bible.
There is no such thing as a Textus Receptus manuscript. The KJV's translators drew heavily from the Tyndale Bible - about 5/6 (83%) of the KJV New Testament is Tyndale's words and about 3/4 (76%) of the KJV Old Testament is Tyndale's words. In turn, Tyndale's New Testament was translated into English using Erasmus’ 3rd printed edition of the text compiled from only eight Greek manuscripts (all dated from the 11th to 16th centuries, with heavy reliance on manuscripts from the 12th to 14th centuries). The translators of the KJV didn't examine any manuscripts for themselves. What they used was _printed critical editions_ (not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts produced by Erasmus, Stephanus & Bezae - and even the Latin Vulgate. The KJV was first published, in 1611. The Textus Receptus wasn't even compiled until 1894 (i.e. 283 years later) by Scrivener, who looked for _printed editions_ (again, not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts supporting the KJV translation, from which he then created the Textus Receptus. Since then, the Textus Receptus has been revised many times and today there are over 100 versions of it. So which Textus Receptus do KJV-onlyists say we should rely on and what makes that edition the one and only "correct" one? Furthermore, the Textus Receptus contains supposed Greek readings that have absolutely no manuscript support, especially in Revelation. For example, the reference to "Thou art righteous, O _Lord,_ which art, and wast, _and shalt be_ " in the KJV and Textus Receptus at Revelation 16:5 is not supported by _any_ manuscript evidence. _Every_ known manuscript contains the equivalent of "Righteous art thou, which art and which wast, _thou Holy One_ ". Indeed, there is _no_ Greek manuscript support for the Textus Receptus' last six verses of Revelation - Erasmus simply created his own version of the Greek text by translating from the Latin Vulgate's text into Greek. The Textus Receptus also includes the _Comma Johanneum_ (1 John 5:7) from the well-known early 16th century forgery called Codex Montfortianus that the RCC used to sneak the verse into Erasmus' 3rd printed edition of the Greek New Testament in 1522 and, from there, into the KJV and, ultimately, into the Textus Receptus. Before Codex Montfortianus incorporated the _Comma Johanneum_ into the text, the only form in which it existed in Greek manuscripts was in 15th century or later marginal notes to manuscripts dated no earlier than the 11th century, demonstrating that it was a comment on the text and not something John wrote.
@@Berean_with_a_BTh You ignored what I wrote. I didn't even mention the AV. Not nice. Erasmus used texts representative of the Greek Orthodox churches which probably came from Constantinople after its fall through Venice not texts of unknow provenance like P66, P75, Vaticanus, and Sinaiticus. Burgon suggested that they were not used by the orthodox whose texts were used for 1500 years and had to be replaced. Blessings.
@@jamessheffield4173 You didn't mention the Textus Receptus or KJV, but you endorsed the comment by @THEBESTINTEREST-ne1hp that did. I suggest you read Metzger's _The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission Corruption and Restoration_ and _A Textual Commentary On the Greek New Testament _ both by Bruce Metzger. Maybe then you'll be better informed about these issues. Right now, though, all you're coming across as is angry and ignorant.
God warned us about textual criticism in his word. 1 Timothy 6:20 King James Bible O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Textual criticism is opposition of science falsely so called..
I hate to break it to you, but the TR, which the KJV is based on, was also compiled with textual criticism. Erasmus and others just had fewer manuscripts to work with.
@@Silky4everThe Textus Receptus is based on the KJV, not the other way around. The KJV's translators drew heavily from the Tyndale Bible - about 5/6 (83%) of the KJV New Testament is Tyndale's words and about 3/4 (76%) of the KJV Old Testament is Tyndale's words. In turn, Tyndale's New Testament was translated into English using Erasmus’ 3rd printed edition of the text compiled from only eight Greek manuscripts (all dated from the 11th to 16th centuries, with heavy reliance on manuscripts from the 12th to 14th centuries). The translators of the KJV didn't examine any manuscripts for themselves. What they used was _printed critical editions_ (not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts produced by Erasmus, Stephanus & Bezae - and even the Latin Vulgate. The Textus Receptus as we now know it wasn't compiled until 1894 (i.e. 283 years later) by Scrivener, who looked for _printed editions_ (again, not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts supporting the KJV translation, from which he then created the Textus Receptus. Since then, the Textus Receptus has been revised many times and today there are over 100 versions of it. So which Textus Receptus do KJV-onlyists say we should rely on and what makes that edition the one and only "correct" one?
“The god that Christians believe in is amazingly stupid if it wants to actually achieve its goal of spreading this information to humanity by relying on text; by relying on languages that die out; by relying on anecdotal testimony. That's not a pathway to truth! And anything that would qualify for a god should know this, which means either that god doesn’t exist or it doesn't care enough about those people who understand the nature of evidence to actually present it.” -Matt Dillahunty
Quoted by someone who holds the truth in unrighteousness. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. God is not on trial, mankind is on trial. There is only one way to be called just before the Holy righteous God. You must believe in Jesus Christ that he died for your sins, was buried and rose the 3rd day.
NT Textual Studies Book Recommendations from Christian Publishing House
FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS: Introduction-Intermediate to New Testament Textual Studies by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586987
Google eBooks: bit.ly/2VbIwVK
THE NEW TESTAMENT DOCUMENTS: Can They Be Trusted by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/194958609X
Google eBooks: [bit.ly/2YQOsnd]
THE P52 PROJECT: Is P52 Really the Earliest Greek New Testament Manuscript? by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586103
Google eBooks: [bit.ly/3c3SbT3]
400,000+ SCRIBAL ERRORS IN THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT MANUSCRIPTS: What Assurance Do We Have that We Can Trust the Bible? by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586928
Google eBooks: bit.ly/2Z7ogI6
THE READING CULTURE OF EARLY CHRISTIANITY: The Production, Publication, Circulation, and Use of Books in the Early Christian Church Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586847
Google eBooks: bit.ly/2XS4J99
MISREPRESENTING JESUS: Debunking Bart D. Ehrman's "Misquoting Jesus" [Fourth Edition] by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586952
THE COMPLETE GUIDE to BIBLE TRANSLATION: Bible Translation Choices and Translation Principles [Second Edition] Authored by Edward D Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/0692728716
BIBLE DIFFICULTIES: How to Approach Difficulties In the Bible by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/B084DLSBZ2
THE KING JAMES BIBLE: Do You Know the King James Version? By Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/KING-JAMES-BIBLE-James-Version/dp/194575799X/
Google eBooks: tiny.cc/ioi5wy
THE KING JAMES BIBLE Why Have Modern Bible Translations Removed Many Verses That Are In the King James Version? by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586960
Google eBook: bit.ly/2p3SFGn
HISTORY OF ENGLISH VERSIONS OF THE BIBLE by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586979
Google eBook: bit.ly/34LxisC
THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS: The Early Christian Writings of Church Leaders Who Followed Soon After the Apostles of Jesus Christ by J. B. Lightfoot
www.amazon.com/dp/B0863S9V9Q
THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS: The Early Christian Writings of Churchmen Who Wrote about Christianity in the Late First and Early Second Centuries by Kirsopp
www.amazon.com/dp/B085DT65NN
THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS: Who Wrote the Book of Hebrews? by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/194958674X
PAUL AND LUKE ON TRIAL: Dating Events Between 33 and 49 A.D. by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586073
BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS I AM: Two Views on Translating John 8:58 by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/B0851LLH74
JESUS CHRIST: The Great Teacher by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586839
THE TEACHER THE APOSTLE PAUL: What Made the Apostle Paul's Teaching, Preaching, Evangelism, and Apologetics Outstanding Effective?
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586030
CONVERSATIONAL EVANGELISM, [Second Edition] by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/194575737X
THE EVANGELISM HANDBOOK: How All Christians Can Effectively Share God's Word in Their Community, [SECOND EDITION], by Edward D. Andrews
www.amazon.com/dp/1945757388
HOW RELIABLE ARE THE GOSPELS? by F. David Farnell
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586650
IS THE QURAN THE WORD OF GOD?: Is Islam the One True Faith?
www.amazon.com/dp/1945757493
THE GUIDE TO ANSWERING ISLAM: What Every Christian Needs to Know About Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586766
MOSAIC AUTHORSHIP CONTROVERSY: Who Really Wrote the First Five Books of the Bible?
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586790
For another view The Revision Revised by John William Burgon.
😅😅
What happened to the rest of the lecture is what we all are thinking...
Very nice, just started these. Not sure if there is a playlist or order. Is there a video that directly follows this opening and so on? Plan on watching them all, subscribed. If I'm ever in the neck of the woods ... def will stop by!
Yes, I just created one-Daniel B. Wallace Videos. Another tool you might enjoy is our two blogs, with thousands of free articles on 125+ Bible subject areas.
Christian Publishing House Blog
christianpublishinghouse.co/
The Updated American Standard Version Blog
uasvbible.org/
Thanks Dr. Wallace I learn a lot
Is that CS Lewis to the left? Great start to a fascinating subject, I'm hooked!
Wow. I live in Edmond and haven’t heard of your facility. I’ll be googling it! Great video and informative on TC.
14:00:00 "the next largest is two verses"?? The good Doctor needs to qualify this statement, (as well as the previous comments concerning Mark 16:9-20 & the PA,) for it's incorrect when singular readings are accounted for.
This is actually just the first lecture in a series of about 37 on this subject. I think the whole course set me back $20-$25 from Credo house, well worth it if this is your interest.
Great video but someone's been sitting with Daniel Brubaker a bit much lol
Wonderful info! But please, could someone mute his mic when he's drinking! 😊
How to get the rest of these lectures?
Why were the current oldest copies found by Tischendorf not put forward for all of those hundreds of years?
Didn’t the people who help these Codex know what they were?
The early church was expecting the imminent return of Christ, textual criticism would have been the last thing on their minds. Who cares if you misquote Paul a little - it's the last days in you're about to be raptured. I think that's partially why you have so much variation.
I hardly think so. See the article below. Nowhere in the NT do you find a dismissive attitude such as yours. In fact, the inference would be to ignore such a person. You really need to study the history of how the Bible came down to us. See book recommendations after the free articles below. Lastly, see the article on the rapture below.
The Early Christian’s View of the Integrity of the Greek New Testament Books
christianpublishinghouse.co/2019/11/30/the-early-christians-view-of-the-integrity-of-the-greek-new-testament-books/
What Does the Bible Really Say About the Rapture?
christianpublishinghouse.co/2016/12/13/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-rapture/
FROM SPOKEN WORDS TO SACRED TEXTS: Introduction-Intermediate New Testament Textual Studies
www.amazon.com/dp/1949586987
HOW WE GOT THE BIBLE
www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTVJGP8B
@@UpdatedAmericanStandardVersion article about rapture would have been much easier to follow if the author had stuck to the point and been concise.
@@williambrewer The purpose of our blogs, is not to be Facebook comments in length. We have thousands of articles on 125+ Bible subject areas, which are anywhere from 5 pages to 150 pages in length. Our mission is not to hand our nibbles that curb hunger pains.
WE CAN TRY AGAIN (HERE IS ANOTHER ARTICLE): Are You Waiting for the Rapture?
christianpublishinghouse.co/2016/12/13/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-the-rapture/
Many do not know that 95% of the 2.8 billion Christians are biblically illiterate. That is not our opinion; it comes from reputable Christian polling companies over the past 40 years. So, our mission is to educate them and win disciples at the same time.
@@UpdatedAmericanStandardVersion you are welcome to your opinion. At any rate, thanks for posting the video.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism.
I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin,
but not the Greek so out it goes.
Good will towards men
Doxology in Matthew
Without cause
God manifest in the flesh
Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin,
so out they go
The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek
and Latin so out they go.
Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8
some throw out.
If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem,
what would you see as a problem?
those are present in the textus receptus manuscript (greek)....textual criticism(nestle aland) is formed by two non protestant priest by the name of westcott and hort(1828) then revived by nestle and aland....they want to go away from 1611 bible.
@@THEBESTINTEREST-ne1hp Yup. Most just follow the party line. Blessings.
There is no such thing as a Textus Receptus manuscript.
The KJV's translators drew heavily from the Tyndale Bible - about 5/6 (83%) of the KJV New Testament is Tyndale's words and about 3/4 (76%) of the KJV Old Testament is Tyndale's words. In turn, Tyndale's New Testament was translated into English using Erasmus’ 3rd printed edition of the text compiled from only eight Greek manuscripts (all dated from the 11th to 16th centuries, with heavy reliance on manuscripts from the 12th to 14th centuries). The translators of the KJV didn't examine any manuscripts for themselves. What they used was _printed critical editions_ (not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts produced by Erasmus, Stephanus & Bezae - and even the Latin Vulgate.
The KJV was first published, in 1611. The Textus Receptus wasn't even compiled until 1894 (i.e. 283 years later) by Scrivener, who looked for _printed editions_ (again, not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts supporting the KJV translation, from which he then created the Textus Receptus. Since then, the Textus Receptus has been revised many times and today there are over 100 versions of it. So which Textus Receptus do KJV-onlyists say we should rely on and what makes that edition the one and only "correct" one?
Furthermore, the Textus Receptus contains supposed Greek readings that have absolutely no manuscript support, especially in Revelation. For example, the reference to "Thou art righteous, O _Lord,_ which art, and wast, _and shalt be_ " in the KJV and Textus Receptus at Revelation 16:5 is not supported by _any_ manuscript evidence. _Every_ known manuscript contains the equivalent of "Righteous art thou, which art and which wast, _thou Holy One_ ". Indeed, there is _no_ Greek manuscript support for the Textus Receptus' last six verses of Revelation - Erasmus simply created his own version of the Greek text by translating from the Latin Vulgate's text into Greek.
The Textus Receptus also includes the _Comma Johanneum_ (1 John 5:7) from the well-known early 16th century forgery called Codex Montfortianus that the RCC used to sneak the verse into Erasmus' 3rd printed edition of the Greek New Testament in 1522 and, from there, into the KJV and, ultimately, into the Textus Receptus. Before Codex Montfortianus incorporated the _Comma Johanneum_ into the text, the only form in which it existed in Greek manuscripts was in 15th century or later marginal notes to manuscripts dated no earlier than the 11th century, demonstrating that it was a comment on the text and not something John wrote.
@@Berean_with_a_BTh You ignored what I wrote. I didn't even mention the AV. Not nice. Erasmus used texts representative of the Greek Orthodox churches which probably came from Constantinople after its fall through Venice not texts of unknow provenance like P66, P75, Vaticanus, and Sinaiticus. Burgon suggested that they were not used by the orthodox whose texts were used for 1500 years and had to be replaced. Blessings.
@@jamessheffield4173 You didn't mention the Textus Receptus or KJV, but you endorsed the comment by @THEBESTINTEREST-ne1hp that did.
I suggest you read Metzger's _The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission Corruption and Restoration_ and _A Textual Commentary On the Greek New Testament _ both by Bruce Metzger. Maybe then you'll be better informed about these issues. Right now, though, all you're coming across as is angry and ignorant.
God warned us about textual criticism in his word.
1 Timothy 6:20
King James Bible
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
Textual criticism is opposition of science falsely so called..
I hate to break it to you, but the TR, which the KJV is based on, was also compiled with textual criticism. Erasmus and others just had fewer manuscripts to work with.
@@Silky4everThe Textus Receptus is based on the KJV, not the other way around.
The KJV's translators drew heavily from the Tyndale Bible - about 5/6 (83%) of the KJV New Testament is Tyndale's words and about 3/4 (76%) of the KJV Old Testament is Tyndale's words. In turn, Tyndale's New Testament was translated into English using Erasmus’ 3rd printed edition of the text compiled from only eight Greek manuscripts (all dated from the 11th to 16th centuries, with heavy reliance on manuscripts from the 12th to 14th centuries). The translators of the KJV didn't examine any manuscripts for themselves. What they used was _printed critical editions_ (not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts produced by Erasmus, Stephanus & Bezae - and even the Latin Vulgate.
The Textus Receptus as we now know it wasn't compiled until 1894 (i.e. 283 years later) by Scrivener, who looked for _printed editions_ (again, not actual manuscripts) of the Greek & Hebrew texts supporting the KJV translation, from which he then created the Textus Receptus. Since then, the Textus Receptus has been revised many times and today there are over 100 versions of it. So which Textus Receptus do KJV-onlyists say we should rely on and what makes that edition the one and only "correct" one?
“The god that Christians believe in is amazingly stupid if it wants to actually achieve its goal of spreading this information to humanity by relying on text; by relying on languages that die out; by relying on anecdotal testimony. That's not a pathway to truth! And anything that would qualify for a god should know this, which means either that god doesn’t exist or it doesn't care enough about those people who understand the nature of evidence to actually present it.”
-Matt Dillahunty
Quoted by someone who holds the truth in unrighteousness. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
God is not on trial, mankind is on trial.
There is only one way to be called just before the Holy righteous God. You must believe in Jesus Christ that he died for your sins, was buried and rose the 3rd day.