Atomic Heart vs Cyberpunk 2077 - Physics and Details Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
- In this video I show a full comparison of physics and details Atomic Heart (2023) vs Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) Video completely filmed and edited by me (GameBest) I compare the physics of details, graphics, the behavior of NPCs, and more
For all questions - g4mebes7@gmail.com
Timings:
0:00 - Train Logic
0:37 - Water Physics
1:14 - Healing Animation
1:39 - Shooting at car tires
2:32 - Swimming
3:09 - Robot Attack
3:38 - Glass Physics
4:25 - Jumping from a moving Car
4:53 - Water walking Details
5:39 - Car Explosion
6:20 - Can an NPC swim?
7:04 - Car Details
Cyberpunk 2077 vs Atomic Heart
#atomicheart #cyberpunk2077 #cyberpunk - Ігри
![[4K160fps+] Atomic Heart gameplay looks absolutely INSANE on RTX 4090 with DLSS 3 and RTGI](/img/n.gif)
Don't forget that a small studio with 20 people worked on the atomic heart, and a huge studio with 800 workers worked on Cyberpunk.
350, not 800
@@reyk3524 that's some next level news source
@@reyk3524 KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK GREAT FONT
And atomic heart still runs better.
20? Bruh, russian gov support them
the fact the Atomic Heart is their first game that Mundfish is actually decent with only few bugs
Imo, decent is an understatement
The art direction in particular was incredible. Great music, good optimization, decent combat, okay story
VR Atomic Lunapark was first game
All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
The game doesn’t have many contents thus less bugs
I love when games have that small detail of tires deflating when you shoot at them. So satisfying.
yet useless, a fcking bullet ricochet of a wheel rim is satisfying...
Try shooting at tires in GTA IV. That's some next-level shit
Try shooting a trash bag it's more satisfying to see it deflating
We are talking about GTA, made it by ROCKSTAR.
All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
Cyberpunk went from having no water physics to having some really nice ones.
Cyberpunk was made by inexperienced amateurs
@@exysa2798 Are you serious?
It was made by CDPR.
Y’know, the folks that made the fucking Witcher?
And you call them amateurs?
I’m not really defending Cyberpunk here, but I am defending CDPR.
@@thenoteworthy1298 It has been confirmed that a lot of talented people left the studio (which some of them joined or formed new) before CP77 was started to be worked in 2017.
Plus the leader got replaced. So what are you speaking is the new CDPR, not classic one you know.
@@thenoteworthy1298 All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
@@xXSilentAgent47Xx This. Another one finally knows. More and more people know that all The Witcher 3 developers left after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace, etc.
CDPR will never make a good Game again because more and more developers are leaving the company and no one wants to work for scammers.
Both games are amazing and some of my all-time favourite, but one thing is certain: Atomic Heart definitely had a solid release in terms of technical quality and optimization. You simply can't play Cyberpunk from disc without updating to the latest version, while Atomic works just fine without game breaking bugs.
Atomic heart is literally a puzzle game with a mid story and a shit ton of bugs
@@rezalmao no problem man
@@marcvirus3325 game has many problems
@@rezalmao Your first two reasons are subjective.
@zomba8189 nope it's facts I put 10 hours into this game seeing it if would get better and no it did not
Cyberpunk already have years worth of bug fixes while Atomic Heart just released, so if you are doing a comparison, compare it with Cyberpunk at release. Regardless, both are great games, and there should be no competition between the two, just enjoy playing any game. :)
Also, Atomic is running on unreal, so a lot of the physics details like tires popping, glass, and water are already baked into the engine, while cdprodjectk built their own engine.
@@CHEEBnRUN oh I didn't know they made their own engine
@@CHEEBnRUN Then why didn't CDPR use unreal engine? Did their red engine have superior performance compared to unreal?
If they use their own engine, they have responsibility to make sure their engine have best effects. Otherwise, please use unreal instead
@@liamlvp3886 they are gonna use unreal for the next witcher.
Atomic hearth is russian game. Thats big - for it
4:50 The way the cars just spawned out of nowhere ☠️
That’s on their engine, if you stop looking they stop moving. (Like I’m GTA IV basically)
@@TipoIrritable This argument only make it worst, GTA IV was released in *2008*
@@ConkerVonZap Choom, it's "worse" not "worst".
@@darth7604 Terrific.
Atomic heart had some of the best reactive animations I’ve ever seen. I was always terrified of shooting the black suit karate robots with the shotgun cause if it doesn’t kill them then they just get knocked back, re align themselves in the air and land in a reverse slide, and that sets them up for a jumping power attack that always caught me off guard cause I was already onto the next enemy
Atomic Heart is crap, there's no point in even watching it.
I really dont know which is best, buut i soo love that Atomic heart's retro-futurism then.
the god, i finaly have a comment with a lots of likes then!
6:02 The heat haze around the fire is beautiful. I think the first version of Cyberpunk too had that.
One thing about Atomic Heart that I really love is that when you've maxed your shotgun capacity to 10, Nechaev/P-3 started to load with 2 shells instead doing it 1 by one so the animation only takes 5 reloads, and if the last load is an uneven number he does 1 shell instead of 2. I personally have Cyberpunk dear to my heart because it has longer story and deeper characters, but Atomic Heart's Twins robo mommy has probably the best sound/voice effects I've ever seen in any game like, ever. That scream that Right did when she lazered down the plane turbine was haunting as hell, and when Left pinned us down with that *ehm* position she even made a moan, it's insane. Loved both game, on different levels and scales.
Atomic Heart is crap, there's no point in even watching it.
@@Putin-Lox then why are here and reading any of these, weirdo
3:06 Bruuh, the shadow 💀💀💀
I would also compare the budgets of these games and the experience of game studios.
The biggest is optimization. Atomic heart does 1080p medium 60fps on a 1650. Try to hit that without fsr on cyberpunk.
Cyberpunk is more detailed and graphically greater than atomic heart
@@randyx3976 Mate. I slapped on cyberpunk mod in gta v with many graphical mods and maxed out density then via mods increased it by 50%.
I still retain 60fps. So no, cyberpunk is very unoptimized.
@@siyzerix funny how i played c2077 in my gtx 750 and still got 30+fps, so it's far from unoptimized
@@randyx3976 And thats with FSR. At 1080p low settings. Atomic heart does the same, without FSR at 1080p low settings.
Cars and people appear and disappear spontaneously in cyberpunk. That's some real futuristic teleportation that I've never seen in other games.
Imo the healing with one hand upgrade in atomic heart has such a cleaner animation than the base one. I'm sad that's not one of the ones presented :c
Working my way to that one
Funny how 1955 setting felt more futuristic than 2077 one..
That's because the game is Russian, dude. Well, in fact, Cyberpunk is about the cyber future, and Atomic Heart is about retrofuturism, he is rather closer to Fallout.
Cyberpunk view of future feels surreal because of how stereotypical and Hollywood'ish it is. Being so oversaturated with stamp details did an L to cyberpunk atmosphere
@@MrDarkEzh and what about it being Russian,dude?
Mainly because cyberpunk is the future from the perspective of the 80s people.
Reminds me Fallout y'know
Atomit Hearth's skin texture its just more real than the real life
Cyberpunk are not base on realism
@@notori-di5et not realism but real life.
En todo caso Atomic es el primer juego de una desarrolladora, mientras cyberpunnk viene de un desarrollador ya con experiencia. Aún así Atomic le gana pues salió sin fallas importantes
Todos los desarrolladores de The Witcher 3 dejaron CDPR después de The Witcher 3 debido a la crisis, la mala cultura en el lugar de trabajo, etc. Cyberpunk fue hecho por nuevos aficionados sin experiencia y NO por The Witcher 3 Veterans. Es por eso que Cyberpunk es tan basura. The Witcher 3 tiene un 93 en Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 tiene un 57. La misma empresa, diferentes personas y desarrolladores.
@@TipoIrritable Veteranos de the Witcher 3?!!!🤨 pero si esa mamada también salió rota, como puedes ponerlos en un pedestal llamándolos veteranos cuándo tampoco supieron hacer su trabajo con ese maldito juego 🤨🤨🤨
@@zonnyone1 Salió rota pero terminó mejorando llegando a ser un excelente y atrapante juego de mundo abierto ojalá Cyberpunk 2077 mejore y este a la altura de The Witcher 3 😔😖
@@TipoIrritableCurrent Cyberpunk>>>>> Atomic heart in terms of everything
Yo jugaba a Cyberpunk en el año 1994 cuando era solo un juego de Rol sobre papel (con dados), por eso esperé varias décadas a que fuera un videojuego.
Sin embargo, a pesar del enorme Cariño que le tengo a Cyberpunk, la verdad es que a mí me ha gustado mucho más Atomic Heart 💗😎👍
Probé ambos, con Cyberpunk tengo 170 horas y con Atomic Heart 50.
Cyberpunk me agrada unas 100 veces más.
@@TipoIrritable тогда почему у тебя количество часов в кибер банк не в 50 раз больше чем у атомного сердца, ммм??
@@gaer9012 si
Киберпанк - вечное лазанье по мусорным кучам среди опустившихся наркоманов, общение с криминалом и неадекватами, успокаивание киберпсихов, и все равно ты умираешь и будущего нет.
Атомное сердце - разгребание последствий алчности и мизантропии нескольких самовлюбленных людей в мире, созданном для комфортной жизни людей, для саморазвития, научного познания, где "от каждого - по способностям, каждому - по труду", где зовут к звездам.
Выбор немного очевиден, вы правы 🙂
I love how cyberpunk still has some bugs and flaws but the developers are still doing their best to fix the game
I mean, as they should, it's their job. It's basically the least they could do which is fixing the broken game. After all the talk about how "We leave greed to others" and then turned around to lie in their marketing, fixing their broken game was the absolute minimum they should be doing right now.
@@khoavo510 thanks
@@Milkman_thesecond no problemo
bro CD projekt is TRASH
@@77LUCKYNUMBER77 wtf are you talking about
6:25 dude, thats about 300lbs of metal
Big brain mode
6:39 killing npcs and driving in the water - can they swim? ...
lol
Well, he could talk to one of em...
Nice comparison. Atomic Heart vs Cyberpunk 2077 after 17934 patches.
Now let's compare them at release.
That would be more fair.
Atomic Heart: Cumplió con las expectativas
CP2077: No cumplió con las expectativas
I still think Atmoic Heart looks better than Cyberpunk after the CYberpunk patches lol
@@onigshii thts true
@@onigshii nah
@@onigshiinot true though. They have different art styles first off so you're welcome to prefer one over the other, but CP2077 objectively has better textures, lighting, and reflections
Why don't you compare release versions of the two? Cyberpunk was an alpha version that cost $50 when it was released
$50? Wasn’t it $60
I like the way bullets reflected to tyres in cyberpunk ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
5:16 Is this the first time I've seen this in cyberpunk?😲😲😲
That's because of the 92947 patches
@@user-wj3cn3mv9u Actually "only" 16 patches. :D It was added in 1.5 which was the 13th patch.
@@PeterPauls actually its only 5 patches, hotfixes hardly count
04:25 but where did ya actually showing it? cuz i can't see ya can jump out of the car in Atomic Hearts here
Сравнению не подлежит. Атомное сердце ещё не успели за пару лет починить и исправить его от количества ошибок и багов.
Все мы помним первые дни жизни Киберпанка))
Но даже если так, то Киберпанк всеравно будет на уровень выше Атомного Сердца, не смотря на явные преимущество наших парней. Для второй игры - это невероятный успех, но не настолько широкий, как его преподносят. Лично мне игра понравилась, советую, не пожалеете.
( Американцам не понравилась из-за плохой озвучки, как же они чувстуют)) )
@@kannudano5738 только.. не только русские делали эту игру
А сами издатели.. Скрыли, что разрабы из рашки тоже есть, так шо.. Ой как не ловко то
@@jagabaga1431 А что дальше? Все прекрасно знали, что компания - русская.
@@jagabaga1431 Игру делали в большинстве русские, а скрыли их потому что боялись санкций и запрета игры над которой они трудились больше 5-ти лет, любой бы так поступил
@@jagabaga1431 русские тоже, хохол)
Let’s be honest they should both be doing better if we take red dead 2 as the gold standard.
Dude, Rockstar games in itself are on a league of their own, so can we please stop comparing games like these to Rockstar games, its starting to get annoying.
Yeah, comparing Rockstar to these piece of garbages is blasphemy.
@@anonymous_dot_com2326 if you wanna be the best you’ve got to beat the best and that’s what the other studios should be shooting for right?
@@TerryHoskin It’s hard if said company treat their employees like garbage and developing new game cost a lot
@@Ellie-Williams. as someone who liked both of these games, ok
Cyberpunk looks hands down way better but props to atomic heart. I've heard it has a small studio and this is their first game it looks amazing and I want to play it now. Atomic heart reminds me more of the first dying light then cyberpunk from what I've seen
2:14 nothing went wrong,the tire were made by the obsidians!
I like the way car got exploded in cyberpunk ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
unica coisa que Surpreendeu ai No Ciberpunk Foi o Movimento da Agua.
sim eu nao aguento a gringaiada mamando esse jogo triste
@@greenskin8266 quem ama mamar esse jogo são os brasileiros "hurr Durr CDPR baseados poloneses Durr"
The amount of money spent on developing the Atomic Heart was far less than that of Cyberpunk
Ah yes I love a good Apples to Burritos comparison.
Did anyone else notice there’s 2 floors to the ground texture underwater in cyberpunk at 6:46 lmao
Amazing video best
atomic heart gunplay really reminds me of far cry 6 gunplay. they're somewhat similar to me
Чем
Creo que es importante saber que tan necesarias son algunas físicas de algunos objetos para la inmersividad del mismo. Por ejemplo CounterStrike no tiene las mejores físicas... Pero es muy inmersivo por tener otros ingredientes que son los importantes a la hora de jugar.
5:07 вообще несравнимые вещи. В атомике это прогулки по густому полимеру, в киберпанке - просто по мелководью. Физика разная.
I mean we comparing a Indie Game to a Triple a Game that says a Lot and Atomic Heart is great
Why you think that Atomic is a indie game?
@@thatfeel5092 bbcs it's first game from nongame studio Mundfish
@@thatfeel5092 first google search result
An indie game, short for independent video game, is a video game typically created by individuals or smaller development teams without the financial and technical support of a large game publisher, in contrast to most "Aaa" (triple-A) games. Because of their independence and freedom to develop, indie games often focus on innovation, experimental gameplay, and taking risks not usually afforded in AAA games
@@Jericho19111bro doesn't know what indie game is 💀💀💀
@@DementiaSlayer Me?And what are you think so?
Absolutely love your channel
Didn’t somebody else do this exact same video besides the train part?
Try to guess which one is the indie game
Both games have their own amazing
, no need to compare
that's those match one game vs one game isn't on my state ^^
i prefer vids focus on sub system on a game , for example AC Odyssey , getting a lot of hate but looking deeper there's plenty awesome details . Like as Cyberpunk 2077 , some few people never notice on every action of the player on the world you can watch the news , or listen some few people , spreading the info ^^.
and every time reviews , critics from few people spending wrong info with their short play time .
to resume for example like as Cyberpunk 2077 , AC odessey was too easy , too much guided , too much info info on the Hud...
just pick the right difficulty for you , just turn off some display info for the HuD , just turn off or enable some gameplay setting :)
does this work with the dev version?
2:09 Now I understand why you can't flatten the tire in Cyberpunk 2077
이런 영상 나올 때마다 레데리좌.. 그는 대체....
Кто это
Atomic Heart looks beautiful, but Cyberpunk is one of my top 3 games and just speaks to my soul. Also loved the stealth hacking.
2:28 that song... Maine?
year 2077 and they finnaly have bullet proof tires lets go
Atomic heart took since 2008 for the ones that didn't know
Only concept and ideas. Game started developing in 2013
Time to defend Cyberpunk 2077 again
You are not supposed to be able to access the rails or the train in CP2077.
The tyres don't deflate because it's the future.
Whole lot i could say but i'll just say this, the game are too different to compare honestly
Cyberpunk 2077 fans: dude CP is fixed now, it's ultra detailed now and has zero bugs
I can't believe Cyberpunk is still so jacked up! 🤣
Cyberpunk is focused on graphics more than physics but it's getting better +>
Que guapo se ve el atomic hearts
Bulletproof tires actually makes sense
I didn’t know that cyberpunk had trains
Cyberpunk will forever be a meme
For limited people ya
and a great game
Atomic heart ❤️
🤮
@@mfeeefeee ur brain 💩➡️🧠
cyberpunk > atomic
I really wish cyberpunk doesn't have a bug when it's released beacuse most people just don't care about cyberpunk anymore thinking there's still a lot of bug
All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
Lol, I have never seen bullets bounce off tires before !!!
So basically Atomic heart is the launch version of CP2077. Give it the same time and money cp2077 got and it'll improve far behind without relying on questionable marketing tactics. 😏
Played both games from day 1, 30fps max graphics on my low-mid end pc, enjoyed both and had 0 problems with both, amazing games!
What do you consider low-mid? I'm curious since I haven't upgraded in a kinda long time
@@VinnyUnion gtx 1060 6gb 16 ram 3200 and r5 2600x, max it out and set limiter to 30fps or so, fps usually are between 27-35fps for me, switched to a 2070 super two weeks ago and I can do the same but at +60 fps all time
@@Anonymous-si5ig the fast ram makes a real difference. RUST ran visibly smoother with a faster ram from 2400 to 3200
@@VinnyUnion yep, ryzen processors are about ram, to run then we'll I'd say at least 3200mhz is mandatory
@@Anonymous-si5ig 2133 not 2400 :'p brain went full kamikaze bomber
On cyberpunk the train usually just instant kills me
A battle of the Broken ones. This will be legendary.
Atomic Heart is not Broken.
@@mantisreturns2757 it is. also cyberpunk > atomic
In Atomic Heart you can only shoot the red cars, not the others. The comparison is not fair.
Well the red cars are the only ones you can drive so the comparison makes sense
@@rafabuda0 it doesn't...It's simply easier to put more effort designing one car, while cyberpunk has more of them, obviously
Atomic heart giving me fall out 4 vibes
Bulletproof tires in a futuristic world that’s filled with crime, so out of place.
4:45 that was too funny 😆
Well Atomic Heart in some details feels more realistic than Cyberpunk, but both games are good
All The Witcher 3 developers left CDPR after The Witcher 3 because of crunch, bad workplace culture, etc. Cyberpunk was made by new inexperienced amateurs and NOT by The Witcher 3 Veterans. Thats why Cyberpunk is so trash. The Witcher 3 has an 93 on Metacritic. Cyberpunk 2077 has an 57. Same company, different people and developers.
@@TipoIrritable cp77 has a 57 on ps4 bc of performance, on PC it has a 86
To be honest atomic heart gameplay is really difficult
That doesn’t mean it’s bad
Dude game was a cake walk had to beat it again on hardest difficulty to Feel like I actually had a challenge.
@@Kira-pv4xq i'm not saying it's a bad game.
@@nickhutchins2124 fighting with those so called bots ....
@@akkiumre5288 play any soulslike and tell me atomic heart is hard
Let's compare more things:
1. Combat features. (Weapons variability, customization, experience)
2. RPG system (class and perc variability)
3. Stealth
4. Hack mechanic
5. Life system (cyberpunk has some sort of usual npc, traders, citizens, enemies would not attack you without the reason, etc)
6. Side quests.
7. Ways to complete different levels (aggressive, Stealth, peaceful)
8. Romance system
9. Non quest events (cyberpunk sometimes has gangs/police encounters)
10. MC customization.
11. Level experience (try to move objects on the map, shoot glass, search for something interesting)
They put all the work into water physic in Cyberpunk.
Now compare the budgets of these two games.
Then compare the map size and story and side missions and customization options right ?
@@kbkoolin7505 yes
Dont forget that atomic heart is an Indie game while Cyberpunk is a AAA
6:46 Can talk to NPCs in Underwater ? Next GEN LOL
That cyberpunk water physics is amazing 😮
i want to try water physics irl but i dont have a gun...so sad
wait... the train in cyberpunk its a mod? i dont remember it
Cyberpunk: Multimillion tripple A game made by a big studio
Atomic Heart: Indie game which is still better
You are litterarly just simps who bought game just because of twins
@@Hian482 shut up
@@a1c3a1b2 oh you gonna cry now?
@@Hian482 XDDDDDD
@@Hian482 reread what you wrote
Обе игры ещё не доделаны, обе имеют и плюсы и минусы.
вот только atomic heart не был неиграбельным куском кода на релизе
киберпанк доделать не могут, а 3 года уже прошло))
@@user-jz4iw6js4s в смысле не был?
Он сейчас таковым является
@@thatfeel5092 а Вы не в скаченную dev версию играйте, а в лицензионную и сразу мнение поменяется
@@RubeRoiD89 сейчас бы купить трэш по цене Hogwarts Legacy
Да блин 🥞 вы хоть предоставляете что сравнивать Atomic heart ❤️ с Cyberpunk 2077 нет смысла ))
Хотя теперь можно понять кто вложился в водные эффекты больше чем в игру 😅
those NPC were taken to the shadow realm 😂
it makes sense that the tires are bullet proof, just because it's a cyberpunk world they probably invented a new type of resistant rubber alloys, and also considering that night city it's not nice at all when it comes to crime, I wouldn't be impressed if all cars were armored
or you can simply stop being a sheep and accept that CP1889 is just a piece of hot garbage.
@@laminnabam2752 I bet you never played the game to say that, I also have many things against cyberpunk, and yes it is bad in many parts, but to say that the game is bad, is lack of common sense
2:15 One is a game from year 2077 and the other one is from beginning from the first middle century 20, Them both has almost 100 years different, for that the bullets are repellet.
@@unddev The game don't need to explain it for you to realize it.
3:06 shadow is kinda cursed
remember their first action
Atomic Heart goty!
"Crispy critters" shouldn't be anywhere close to GOTY
Atomic heart got first impression ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Read dead redemption 2 physics laughing in an corner
I understand but have bulletproof tires it's very understandable it's the future
Cyberpunk is just phenomenal! I love that game
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkjjkkk
Atomic heart is amazing
but cyberpunk is better
Although cyberpunk obviously takes the win, Mundfish put in some really good work into Atomic Heart and I really enjoyed the game.
Damn dude it's two completely different games with different michanics.
Bro cyberpunk looks so cool
Прикол в том, что атомику харду 2 недели, а кибер панку 2.5 года
2.5 года cdproject исправляли баги😂позорище
Ну да, лучше бы не испрваляли. Уверен ты бы сделал лучше, диванный разработчик
@@fysiotherapeft2272 иди поплачь
@@tostik02 +1
@@tostik02 так атомик не менее багованный лол, че ты тут высрал
Да забей, эти хомяки даже не помнят, чем был ведьмак 3 на релизе, а спустя годы просто возвели культ вокруг этого посредственного дерьма.
I wanted to play cyberpunk, but I prefer to wait other 3 months...