Contact us to find out how we can help you: nomadcapitalist.com/apply Learn from the best by coming to our annual live event, NCL: nomadcapitalist.com/live/ If you liked this video, make sure to see where you can go in the "Age Of Disorder": ua-cam.com/video/nF9M543mldw/v-deo.html
when the nukes go off, the money in the banks will go to $0... Tax is irrelevent and the chances of of it being relevant again is almost 0 in the future. If you come to AU/NZ buy a farm on a creek. Fense it and graze sheep, cows, pigs, goats and chickens. Spend money on infrastructure and enjoy an awesome lifestyle now even if the nukes dont go off and pay the taxes as you get good roads, safe communitys outside the city problems and good schools with broadband. You can skimp every cent, bury your gold like the pirates of old and die that way too, alone with a treasure map to digital money that one EMP will wipe out for ever. Thats a false economy!
Two aliens are flying near earth , The first one says, "the dominant life form here have developed satellite based nuclear weapons."The second alien says, "Are they an emerging intelligence ?" The first one says,"I don't think so, they have it aimed at themselves. "
Living in South Korea for three years made me realize that in a major global event, getting out in a hurry could be nearly impossible. I would also question assumptions that migration/transit policy won´t be changed in a flash in a major global event: consider how much travel was "locked down" in 2020-2021.
If you have the means of people such as Mr. Henderson then you have a private charter jet available. Your 'plane' arrives without enough fuel to divert or "go" to anywhere. Having no entry-permit is irrelevant, once you are "there" it is impossible to remove you, living conditions might be a bit tough for a while.
I am from Czech republic and here it got also pretty bad over last few years. People got unbelievably hostile to each other and it's getting worse year by year.
That's too bad. I have a special place in my heart for the Czechs. My parents escaped CZ in 1969 and now I'm wondering how to leave communist Canada before the shit hit's the fan.
@@MrPatvee sell everything and go. Thats what we did before commie trueDOPE closed off the country in 2021. I miss Canada and what it was before 2020😢
we don't have a CGT. I wish we did so i could go to aussie to live/work and not let them CGT me on my nz assets. if I was going to pay a CGT i'd rather pay it to my own country not to them jokers
As someone who grew up in the 70’s & 80’s and has lived in Central Virginia between DC & Naval Station their whole life, this conversation has always amused me. My whole life I’ve known if there was a strike, I’m dead immediately or soon after. There would be no opportunity “escape” it. I’ll continue to prepare to retire outside the US but nuclear war is the least of my concerns.
There have been literal decades where everyone thought we were on the brink of nuclear war all the time. And to be fair, it may have been quite close from time to time. Yet it didn’t happen. It’s an uttter lose lose situation for everyone involved.
The notion that people can prepare for what happens after a nuclear strike is a very dangerous idea. It makes the people who have their finger on the button underestimate the horror and gamble on it.
The sun only has to slightly dim for a year and that's already enough to wipe out billions. A super volcano can do it and a nuclear conflict absolutely will.
Nuclear Winter is unrealistic Soviet model used to lower war risks in 1970th. Lots of not happening factors were added to the model, from immediate detonations of most of bi partisan nuclear arsenals to ashes magically floating in higher lairs of atmosphere much longer, then it can physically be there, because of gravity etc. Too long fires with too much ashes getting to the atmosphere counted... That's why they all are getting ready to hit each other. Both AuUKUS and Tehran-Moscow-Beijing axle hoping to win, outlast and outsmart during nuclear war.
How pathetic we human beings are. We have been given a beautiful world to enjoy and we spend time thinking of ways to destroy it. Humanity is messed up
My ex husband has been scared of nuclear war destroying the northern hemisphere for 13 years. He moved our family to Brazil in 2012. His job is online. That’s how he survives. We purchased a rural property, which he figured we (me and the kids) could produce food, if needed. He had an affair and abandoned me. I wouldn’t suggest moving to Brazil. Women love to throw themselves at Americans and take advantage of them. But besides that, there is a lot of corruption there. If the world goes into crisis, these SH countries will be affected financially, which will lead to mass poverty, social uprisings, and violence everywhere. If you live rural, you aren’t exempt from thugs finding you and killing you for whatever they want. We had an old neighbor who was robbed at gun point while milking his cows. I don’t think you’ll be safe anywhere in the world. Trust God and pray. Also, getting into these countries isn’t easy, so you’d better be already living there by the time the nukes fly. And if people find out you’re American, they will try to take advantage of you financially.
Worst advice ever, just because what happend to you. You are stupid if you don’t have guns during those times and even during times like now. You should have a gun, it’s naive to walk around without it in South America or North America. An Assault rifle will protect me. Also Corruption is not important if you want to survive. Assault rifle, remote house and knowledge of plans/fishing etc. Is.
@@Wessel3453 Just a PSA: Fishing/Hunting in the NH will likely not be a viable option due to contamination, particularly in the US. Case in point, the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands houses a few ships that were used in nuclear tests over 60 years ago. As a result, a good deal of the fish are contaminated and can't be eaten, even today. Watersheds will likely be completely compromised in the near term after an exchange post-fallout. Also, in the event of a full exchange, growing food above the tropics will be a challenge.
Argentinian here. You people are delirious. The moment the silent subs start launching death you ain't getting nowhere, you must be here already. Second, you wont avoid the chaos, the countries not hit by the nukes will go into inner turmoil, and you will experience first hand a good-old-military coup, which we already had 4 (thanks to the US btw), and you will have to deal with local "rebels" trying to rob you (we ain't starving, we do anything to survive) and a bully government squeezing you dry now and then. It wont be fairytales at the end of the rainbow, it will be another form of hell, one you will be too old and too unprepared to face. The only thing you will achieve by buying land here is to gentrify the locals, even more. You cannot buy a piece of paradise, you have to build it: Argentina is your country, the only requirement to be Argentinian is to love Argentina. What does that even mean? You think Argentina is the land? the history? the traditions, the soccer team? none of that. It's the people, an invisible string of warmth that pierce us and brings affection even among strangers, that make us break personal space and care about people we don't know, something you big city folk no longer have. If you want this place to take care of you when the world is trying to kill you, don't be like the people tearing it up apart, don't come and "buy land", "get papers", "do business" and boast your shinny foreign currency while gentrifying everyone else. Come here and buy your home, not a house, your home, bring your family, bring your business, its brainpower, technology, risk it here, take the gable, you will lose, but its ok you will be fine, its not about winning because the world already lost, get out of your private neighborhood, meet the local people, make friends, take care of them, they will take care of you. Love this place and you will live in a chaotic peace while the rest of the world dies. Or be boring and go to Chile.
Love Argentina!! Looking at setting up a home there. SO I DO NOT MEAN TO SOUND DISRESPECTFUL AT ALL. They just voted a conservative/pro Argen minded president. Saying the right things so far. BUT: 1. Will the Globalist socialist let him live or function effectively? We shall see 2. Will the socialist minded voters vote him out? 3. Will the socialist do another coup and stick in a Khan? So in saying that, Argentina future is in the hands of the people to make right choices and hold the puppet politicians accountable. Or will the revert back to what they were and like Venezuela? We shall see I guess
As a Brazilian i totally agree! How lucky and blessed we are to be latinos and to live in such underful lands... Too bad for the refugees who will make it here, cause by the time they arrive they go'n have to manage to survive here and fight our people in our lands...
Best place is....CHILE, The radiation is blocked by the Andes Mountains and the pacific ocean wind blows the bad air. It's like having you back to the bad stuff.
Kurzegesagt explained this rather well. There's no escaping nuclear war. In the Northern Hemisphere billions of people will die in the famine that ensues after the atmosphere dims. Gruesomeness at a scale humans have never encountered before. It will be like The Road. The Southern Hemisphere stands a better chance and those countries will simply be invaded by whichever militaries are still left to annex the crops and feed their troops.
Why would the northern hemisphere be screwed? Even in the mountainous areas where more wind 💨 and blockage from outside bebris? Just curious. Legit answer please
@@loganpraetorian Wind currents will deposit radioactive fallout even in the valleys. Then the wind currents will cross over the equator and do the same to the Southern hemisphere. There will be no "safe" place. Even if you don't get fatally dosed in Argentina you will get enough exposure to cause genetic damage. Survivors anywhere will breed mutants if they are not sterile.
@@loganpraetorian It's not radiation that you need to be worried about. Modern nukes have very little of that. It's the stratospheric ash (no winds or precipitation up there) that will dim the sunlight enough to make harvests fail for a couple of years. That's enough to make billions starve to death and set our civilization back for centuries. We might not even recover that fast, if at all, as we've blown through all the easily accessible coal reserves to kick start a new industrial revolution.
It's likely only the super-rich would have the means to flee, and they would likely have some armed security people with them. I don't know, they might make it a little longer than the rest of us, but personally, I wouldn't want to be one of them, I'm happy to go out with most of humanity.
Meek is higher intelligence, quiet, is inner wisdom. Strength is superior ability to acclimate. Love is to be humble . Care for one another. Know who is good and how to stealthily methodically deal with evil.
A better discussion would be, how, we as common people can do to stop our elected authorities, keep escalating the aggression to at not returning point, and reach the nuclear wzr.
They created this war Stop electing them. They made you feel like it's your right to vote? I say exercise your right not to vote in politicians who created a hostile totalitarian ghetto in America. They've dumbed society beyond thinking for themselves.
Do you think they'll post the date, time and location of the first strike on Facebook? I hope you do not. This isn't 1952, you won't get days or hours while they fuel missiles or fly bombers to the target zone. The most notice you will get is about 30 minutes, and much less if they are launched from a boomer or Club-K.
First off, bugging out after the first bomb drops is a horrible strategy. So if you've got a safe haven, move there before catastrophe strikes (or within easy commute distance). After that, it's the southern hemisphere. The west coast of a continent (outside the blast radius), preferably with mountain ranges between you and target locations. The eastern rain shadow of a major mountain range, well away from major population centers (northern Rockies, Siberia, etc). Any location will need to be able to produce food (even in a 3yr nuclear winter) and have the resources to produce power (not strictly essential). Availability off safe drinking water goes without saying.
That's an interesting perspective! Argentina does hold promise for growth in the coming years. We've discussed the potential developments in Argentina in detail in this video: ua-cam.com/video/UYs4DCEsdBI/v-deo.html. It's worth considering as you explore your options.
I don't think Argentina is a good place, because Argentina doesn't have large quantities of petroleum, and to produce gasoline you need many other inputs... and we shouldn't forget that fertilizer is needed for plantations
@@koba1980 Argentina's total primary energy mix is dominated by natural gas (55%) and oil (33%), with bioenergy contributing 5%, and hydropower and nuclear another 3% each. Argentina has the 2nd largest reserve of shale gas and the 4th largest reserve of shale oil worldwide. I hope this helps, Vodek
@@vodekz1534 Argentina suffers from constant blackouts and all inputs for gasoline production are imported, in addition to fertilizer for production, not to mention the declining economy. Everything Argentina has is just enough for its population and if 30 million migrants enter Argentina everything will collapse quickly.
Im in asia and already digging 20ft below a bunker in one of the mountains here were me and my dog hide if nukes started flying. And also start a deep well 100 ft deep for my water source. Had stock of canned foods and dog foods to last for 5 yrs and boxes of batteries. I think thats better than doing nothing.
I would not worry about international visas in the event of a nuclear war.. That would be the last ting to worry about, actually travelling to where you want to go is a far larger concern.
Yes. Plus, the immigration laws would change within hours. Aussies couldn't get back to Aus during Covid, you think immigrants are getting let in during a nuclear war? Illegal immigrants who come to Australia by boat are towed back, right now, and it's peacetime.
Plus you need your own plane in the back yard to fly... It was even difficult to go to another city in Canada during COVID.. imagine if bombs are flying. How can you travel
I think we are overlooking the simple fact planes aren’t going anywhere if this happens . 21 hours flight to NZ not too many airlines taking that gamble .
Im from Ecuador and I feel any South-American country will be safe, self-sustainable and a good place to be if there is a Nuclear War. Most of these countries won't get in the War game or their involvement will be more political than actual warfare.
You LIVE in the "war game" whether you want to admit it or not. The fallout will cross the equator, the models prove it and so does the evidence from previous testing and accidents.
It's impossible to get away from a nuclear attack lol unless you go underground. It's the end of human civilization. if you manage to survive you will wish you would instead die. If the bomb doesn't kill you then the nuclear radiation will, even if it doesn't kill you the nuclear winter will. Only option is go underground and have a storage of food that will last 15yrs minimum so the nuclear winter will pass but even after that all crops an nature will be destroyed and the world is pretty much a desert idk how humans will be able to grow stuff again cuz everywhere it will be affected by radiation
I believe , that the WHOLE point of his video is to learn to live as best you can and not give in to fear . Become educated in being mobile as well as flexible. In addition, helping others ( to me) from a business perspective , and the feedback of it, helps me keep my ear to the ground
@@Muriithitalksfootball Well don't take my words for it, There are Countless videos made by UA-camrs about Namibia,Its all on UA-cam and are mostly Positive Remarks...been there myself,I can attest To the fact the Country Seats well with me if anything bad Pops up in the West. Its depends on what you are looking for My Friend,Maybe somethings about the Country may not seat well with you,But its Perhaps one of the Top safest Nations In Africa,Like I Said...There are Germans & Europeans who are living Peacefully there.
@@helenamuniz5269Thank you for your valuable information! I have watched many videos on Namibia and its capital. I've been positively impressed, but you are the first person I've come across on the internet who has been there several times and can attest to the quality of life. Being of German descent myself (Nofziger), but living in California, I take your impressions and experiences to heart. I would imagine that you are talking about moving to the capitol city. Correct?
In my view, you can run, but you can’t hide. I’m staying in the U.S. and strengthening relationships with my immediate neighbors/community. As for a potential nuclear war, we all need to pray that the US will be able to safely transition/collapse as the world’s unipolar empire in an orderly manner without taking humankind into the abyss as well.
Nothing in the US will survive if nuclear war breaks out. Some places in the Southern Hemisphere *might* survive, because the clouds will circulate and the soot will fall mostly in the north. That's it. No one north of the equator will survive.
The problem is that even if you went to a tropical island in the middle of no where, is that all those thousands and thousands of nukes, even if they only hit the major cities. All that toxic nuclear waste would go into the atmosphere and poison the air killing most animals and humans, not to mention the food being poisoned and the sun being blocked. It's not a video game that's just mass extinction.
Yeah, not speaking radioactive tsunami all around, so those islands poor of infrastructures expose you to deadly radiations sooner. It's GAME OVER, and the moment the red button is pressed, all of your money didn't matter anymore.
All the survivors who hid in bunkers don’t know how to do anything that requires physical labor. It will be a bunch of guys telling each other they’re late and to tuck in their shirt and that there is a meeting at 4:00.
Tell your western politicians or leaders to start taking action towards “PEACE “and stop provoking a nuclear war and then no one needs to move anywhere.Wouldn’t that be the sensible topic to talk about than telling people where to move because some idiots have bunkers somewhere?Stop running away from yourself and talk about Peace,Love and Understanding because nobody can survive in this world without this few words.
We have and we do, but they have stolen our vote and are trying to push us to fight each other. But never count us out.. the people of the US understand more than ever what our 7:40 government has done; we are trying to put it right, but these people will not go without a fight. We have to win the war of information.
Andrew, cash is being weined out in Aus and New Zealand, as we speak. I'm worrying I wont be able to buy food soon. I only use cash. We're scared down here.
@@----79821 Your bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies will not be allowed to compete with the official currency, you need to buy tangible assets - like land. If you only see your cryptos as speculative investments and realize that in the event of a nuclear war they will be erased by the EMP, go for it.
Prépare garden , live stock learn survival skills , Aus and NZ are lucky people your survival rate is high . I’m in the middle of Europe. We are basically doomed after a nuclear strikes on both sides .
Might be worth noting an event like nuclear war would bring a lot of uncertainty. I wasn't able to return to NZ during covid despite having a NZ passport. Maybe having a yacht to sail off into the horizon would be a better option.
I live in Scotland and I have seen on another documentary about safe places to go to in event of a nuclear war that The Shetland Islands are the safest place to escape to so I guess I'll be going there!
Ben on the Suspicious Observers Channel has an earth disaster video in his playlist about the coming Solar Flash and Polar Shift that is predicted to happen in most of our life times!! He also does space weather every day too about the solar flares and has been very accurate so far!!! Its a great channel just like this channel, because his videos tell you where the safe zones are to are also!! This is definitely something to be concerned about especially if you live on the coast, low elevation, and where there aren't any caves. Since there are so many other things to be concerned about I'm very grateful for this excellent channel also!!! Thank you Andrew for all you do!!!!
I was born in Argentina, but live in the US for the last 30 yrs. I think Uruguay would be agreat place too. Great weather, food, and the most stable country in South America
Good luck finding means of transportation after a generalized nuclear strike. In 1992, I overflew the state of Florida right after hurricane Andrew swept by. I was ferrying a Cessna C188B (a crop duster aircraft) from Missouri all the way to Southern Brazil. That looked a bit like a post nuclear destruction scenario and most of the telecom network was down. Miami ARTCC had been transferred to St Petersburg. Flight watch and FSS were all down. They could not hear me on VHF, I could barely hear them. I landed in KFXE (Ft Lauderdale Exec) with a waiver and lights signal system from the tower. All flights were cancelled. So maybe having your own Gulfstream (or a fractional of one) might be a good thing if you wanna flee amidst the chaos. 😎 Nuclear Winter would most likely start in North Hemisphere first, and - because of the ITCZ (Inter Tropical Convergence Zone) -, might be confined to it for a while, because of the North & South hemispheres winds circulation. However, the oceans are not (confined). Once the contamination spreads across the seas, the rain over both halves of the Globe would not be exactly "healthy". Each and every form of life would end up ruined. If the current turbo-cancer "pandemic" (I wonder what the cause would be...👀) is kill1ng people all over the planet, wait till nuclear radiation is all over the place. I also wonder if surviving a nuclear holocaust would be a blessing or a curse (like living in some sort of "The Walking Dead" or "Mad Max" scenarios, degrading human kind back to tribalism, barbarism etc) especially if one has kids... sorry if I sound pessimistic. If you wanna settle in South America as in a Holocaust Plan B, then welcome. 😎🥂
The question of the ocean being polluted is an interesting one. Radioactive isotopes are heavy so would likely sink to the bottom. But all the ash and soot and stuff would likely mess up the oceans, even in the south.
For whatever it's worth, I think that Perth along with the entire West Coast, Darwin, maybe Tasmania and South Africa would be very good choices. Although in Darwin or the Kimberly, you might eventually die of boredom.
Andrew, love your variety of topics and suggest you investigate the upcoming catastrophe of the reversal of the magnetic poles or the end of the gulfstream and the upcoming Ice Age for the Northern Hemisphere.
There is a reason that all apocalyptic fiction points out that the other humans are the real danger. Social cohesion would not exist and you would struggle to find and keep any resources that were left. The best place would have the most resources to fewest people ratio.
If it goes down, your best personal outcome is to be at the epicenter on impact. If you're elsewhere and you survive impact, the question isn't if you will bite it, it's how long it will take & how crappy an experience it will be.
I think if I survived with my daughter, the worst thing would be watching her starve or dye of radiation poisoning. Think I'll opt out of trying to survive the first wave and live like tomorrow will come.
Reminds me of a scene from Star Trek IV where Captain Kirk and Spock are on a bus in 1980’s San Francisco. There’s a punk with a loud stereo playing “Let’s just push the button we’d be better off dead” Not an actual song btw but I totally get it
@@jameswest4819 You sound triggered. The studies from the 80s predict that even if only of fraction of the total US-USSR (now Russia) arsenals were deployed, the dust clouds would cover the northern hemisphere. The nuclear winter they predicted would be very bad. They produced a map which showed temperature drop of in America between -20.Temp drop at the equator would be around -5. The decrease in sunlight will eliminate crop production in the northern hemisphere. Animals will be eaten. Nothing will grow. It will be massive graveyard. That bunker in your backyard will be your grave.
As a Kiwi who lives in Australia as a permanent resident, the taxes and the cost of living will get your ass in both countries. 😂😅 but it's amazing to call both countries my home ❤
a lot of people don't know this but nuclear fallout wont be as major as people think as long as you stay away from big cities and military targets you will have a chance to survive
One ICBM, and it would never be just one, would hammer this planet so harshly that most folks that survive the localized detonation would die a miserable death without any available or viable medical intervention. If I were privy to an impending nuclear attack, I’d probably walk towards the epicenter rather than be the sole survivor and king of my mountain of debris.
@@gustavogoncalves3900The problem with Argentina/Chile is once the nuclear winter starts and crops start failing all the Countries from Brazil, Columbia, Venezuela, Peru, will start migrating south and start fighting for the little remaining resources left, the best place to be is in a self sustaining island with large reserves of non-perishable food.
You have roughly between 6 and 32 minutes (depending the launch platform) to be in the air. So unless you own or have 24/7 access to a private jet (i.e., you a billionaire) you likely toast. Having a second residency should be the least of one’s concern. The only way this makes sense is to be gone before the event (be in the know) and leave ahead of time. Everyone should listen to the recent interview by Lex Fridman of Annie Jacobsen. Details this scenario very well and how futile it would be for humans even if one was able to survive the initial blast / fallout.
Having a place to go is good. Being proactive and adaptable is just as important. You never want to be the guy standing there with a WTF expression and no clue what to try next.
My garden shed is pretty strong may have to put double glazing on it though and put a chain on the thing to steak in the ground.Should be Good to go then hopefully but failing that Easter Island
In the case of a nuclear war I can assure you Russia would have a spare nuke directed at Zuckerberg island. Just to make sure he wouldn't laugh. They have 5000. Definitely Zuckerberg would be on the list.
@@samirods All the "New World Order" leaders, the globalist "elites", the UN, WEF, WHO and EU headquarters are on the Russian list, you can bet about that, and also the residences of the ones that provoke the war.
Thanks for covering this Andrew! Joel Skousen’s book Strategic Relocation covers all of this including maps with primary and secondary nuclear targets. Bugging out to Australia, SE Asia or NZ is not the best strategy because in the next world war it’s expected that the CCP will attempt to take these areas over. Joel mentioned places like Uruguay as good options. Even some of the freedom states had a very high ranking. Furthermore island are cut off from the imports they require during war. That includes Hawaii. Are you aware that a certain U.S. general said when he retired that the CCP has intentions to take Taiwan by 2027, and the malware in the US power grid was to be used to disrupt their power distribution when the 🇹🇼invasion begins.
I think in the event of a nuclear exchange between US and Russia, theres no way we can move using planes or plan a regular trip, by Sea may be it will be possible to move. Mayor information services and communications will be down and power plants and oil supply will be out of the reach for general public. We will have a food crisis everywhere and it will take some time to recover some kind of order and good exchange needed to operated our modern live styles. Big cities can't survive without energy so there will be a massive migration to rural areas anyway. Probably best place in my opinion is Chile over argentina, because we are protected by two huge mountain formations forming a long valley over 2500 kilometers long, with mountains in the north, East, and West. Im ready here so im set 😁
Simple system: buy a sailboat and sail to the South Seas. You can stay on the high seas for weeks, sometimes months. Virtually free rides and there's no shortage of fish.
Tsunami. And radioactive tsunami too. Most people seems not to understand what a nuclear war means. It mean: around -20° C the whole world, extreme climatic events, most of those fishes will be contaminated. It's not Hollywood.
That's what I would have done if I was a younger man. Though I know a long time sailor who pointed out piracy is not out of the question on the high seas. Way out in the middle of nowhere you could find yourself in a pickle. And if civilization truly breaks down, those pickles could become quite common.
I think New Zealand has investments from enough Russian and Chinese billionaires that it wouldn't be in their interest to shoot a nuke down there either. But New Zealand actually is overall pretty neutral for a western aligned country, after all they did get kicked out of ANZUS for not letting US Naval vessels dock due to nuclear fears and doesn't have a Free Trade Agreement with the USA (But it does with China).
I worry about some of the countries you mentioned becoming more brutal in a global event. Not sure you would be all that safe in some countries in S. America for example, if the world shut down.
@@KeepingItRealBro Fair point, but I do think certain cultures are more aggressive and less communal than others. Even in this video it is mentioned how the US has become more brutal. I think an important factor is to realize certain cultures will be less supportive than others. Hard to deny.
I live in Lima Peru. I watched the scientific studies (4 of them, i recollect); that it would take 2 weeks for the fallout from the northern hemisphere to blow downwind to here. I don't know if Lima would get hit (there are enough bombs for every major city on Earth); I would prefer to live behind the northen mountains. MINIMUM: iodine pills, gas masks; lots of water
I've lived in the Philippines for the last 6 years. It's a GREAT place to live, and retire. EVERYONE speaks English. And, MOST food is locally produced...
@@MuzharJamaluddin English is the OFFICIAL language of the Philippines. It was enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. What is pathetic about that?
Read that The Philippines recently strengthened their partnership with the US, with the us investing in their economy and military also running maritime drills and exercises over there in the south china sea etc so if thing might escalate the Philippines will be in the thick of it alongside Japan vs China
Iceland's problem is food production. Iceland imports a billion dollars of food a year for a population of 400k. Most of that is probably grain and produce. And good luck surviving a nuclear winter there. You're better off closer to the equator.
@@voice.of.reason All of Russia and the US will be gone. That's where most of the nukes will fall. All other nuclear armed countries will be gone too, ironically.
Exactly. Here we have a video telling us where to go in case of a nuclear war and not a word about fallout, radiation, nuclear winter etc. Go to Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.... The most braindead thing I have seen for a while.
Mixing up priorities here… If you’re looking to survive, you pay whatever the price is - including taxes. If you want to get to Australia without $10m and you’ve a week to do it before Brandon sits on the big red button, fly commercial to Papua New Guinea or East Timor via Singapore, then look at the “independent cruise sector” to take in the wilderness coasts of far north Queensland or Northern Territory. Virtually no one there, brutal climate, a menagerie of animals lining up to kill and/or eat you. But nobody will know your there. It’s actually happening *right now* and the politicians have no idea how to police - there are thousands of kms of coastline. But if you’re desperate, right…?
I've seen a few of these WWIII videos on this channel now. I'm grateful for the information, but I'm interested to know why the tropical, fertile, (generally) politically neutral Caribbean islands are never mentioned as safe havens in the event of nuclear fallout...🤔. I know the social infrastructure isn't the best in the world but neither are the facilities in the equally beautiful Pacific islands. I'd be happy to hear anyone's good insights.
In the event of nuclear war, being anywhere near Eastern US is the most dangerous. Russia has the poseidon nuke sub just parked in the Atlantic right now. It produces a 300 ft wall of nuclear water capable of wiping out the eastern shoreline of the US(and likely impact carribean). If nukes are flying then Russia moves into check mate quickly. Theres no way to stop the poseidon if it launches. Absurd the US would be poking the bear at this stage is beyond insanity.
Porque varios de los países caribeños serían atacados Las islas bajo dominio estadounidense, Puerto Rico y hasta Cuba por su lugar estratégico Prácticamente toda la zona sería devastada, y las islas que no sucumbiría al caos social y hambruna
(having to traveled to these countries myself in the past): Your suggestion of Argentina is excellent: it has a lot of food, and open spaces. Big NO for Fiji: it has a dense population (and China drug gangs traffic through Fiji to Australia.)
Switzerland is overrated. if a nuke hits Paris or anywhere near in EU the alps aren't gonna save anyone. Even if they have bunkers for the whole population, they might survive but then what? I'd rather be far away on an island
I would look at whether those places could feed themselves currently without imports. Let’s say there is a nuclear war between the US +nato, versus Russia and China. The reality, is that once you remove northern countries like US, Canada, Russia, Ukraine, Western Europe etc. A large percentage of the global food production is gone without taking into account dust blocking out the sun for any period of time and also whether other major food producers like Argentina, Brazil, or Australia are hit as well.. Also In any post nuclear world, people need to take into account that locals in places that somehow survive, may be outright hostile to foreigners because resources will be scarce and they may blame outsiders for the war.
@@redstone5062 True. One of the main factors I was looking at was local fresh water, a-lot of the islands in the American virgin islands have no natural or local sources for drinking water. Places like the Dominican Republic and Jamaica do though.
@@GEN_X_ I think Dominican Republic would be a difficult because neighbouring Haiti is already a failed state and people there would be desperate and spill over. Jamaica could be a possibility. Maybe parts of Central America like Costa Rica or Belize but Panama would have a big bullseye on it because of the canal. In the Atlantic, the Azores would be ideal due to low population and available food and fresh water. The problem is Portugal is in NATO and the US has a base on one the islands. So at the very least, the island hosting the base would be targeted.
Hear me out: how about Amity Island? It's close to some targets, sure, but that gives and takes! The sharks nearby will probably mutate into gargantuan monsters who will guard your "moat" from marauding bands of looters and, worse, skinny dipping teens.
@@anthonyiannozzi6777 for you maybe. I'm learning not to wastey wishes, so I'll have Both ! I mean, it just wouldn't be nice of me to make either feel rejected. 😉, and I wouldn't feel good to break up the couple already, I'm just a nice guy. 😊😁😎🥳
I worked out years ago that NZ would be a good choice and emigrated here in 2008. I'm ex forces and applied forces thinking behind my decision. The isolation was a huge factor considering nuclear fallout and that lead to the next reason. Food wise in a desperate situation there's always cannibalism, yep, that desperate, but they both support my number one reason. Water. The west coast is known for rain and plenty of water. Clean water is more important than food.
@@ForbiddTV Our location means we will be a low hanging target. Our location will also be a place they want to "preserve" because it will hold uncontaminated water and become a reliable breadbasket for the winner. There WILL no doubt be targets here of importance but for the above reasons they would be strategically taken out, not eliminated via a nuclear weapon.
@@ForbiddTV No, not special, it just has better odds. If all the major players throw missiles at each other all the radioactive clouds, generally speaking, with be going around the equator and spreading, but not pole to pole. It's just a best guess for me, mind you we have a pole shift incoming so..... I just know I stand a better chance here than in London.
My husband is American and I am Peruvian American (I have double nationality) and I own a property in San Borja (Lima) unfortunately every time I go, I can observe more and more presence of CHINA over there… they are building a huge port over there (Similar they did in AFRICA) and now they own Phone Companies, Electricity and Water Companies that used to be independent before… and similar situations are going on in other parts of LATAM but regular people are not paying attention unfortunately. The reality unfortunately is IF there is a NUCLEAR WAR there were no SAFE PLACE to go.
I live in Oxapampa, Perú, and I agree that China is trying very hard to take over everything that they can in Per, however, I don' think that this will result in Perú being a target of nuclear wrapons at any point. I actually think projects such as the port of Chancay may be of benefit to Perú in the future, perhaps even more after China collapses, which I expect it to do within the next ten years regardless of whether there is war. Also, where I live has a mild climate, sheltered geography, plenty of fresh water and everything grows, Even in event of nuclear winter I don't think it will be difficult to survive.
@@fernandodelcuadro Hermoso. Para mi, Oxapampa ofrece la mejor calidad de vida en el Perú. Por la herencia austroalemana, hay casas bonitas, quesos y chorizos estilo europeos, la mejor carne de Peru. Es un lugar tranquilo, rodeado de la naturaleza. Lo unico llueve mucho en los meses de diciembre hasta abril. Tambien la ruta para llegar desde Lima tiene muchas curvas, pero ya se va a construir el nuevo aeropuerto regional.
Paraguay and Uruguay are two countries extremely dependent on Brazil for food and energy, but if Brazil does not cut economic relations with its neighbors, both countries are better than Argentina, as the production and economic factor in an apocalyptic world has a great weight.
@@koba1980 paraguayan here, paraguay doesn't depends from those countries for food and energy, you're completely wrong, we produce our own food, top quality btw, two majors enery producers in south america are in Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil, the energy are shared between these countries, none of them are the owners, as the current crisis in argentina, paraguay and brazil are top producers of quality meat in south america, stability in paraguay are better than in brazil and argentina, so doors are opened for you here, give it a try, good place for investment and digital nomads, very few people
Folks….Folks I was in the Air Force while Russians where flying nuclear bombers up and down out east and west coast always prepping for world war 3…….. there won’t be a nuclear war it will be economic with money or another proxy war think Afghanistan or Vietnam. The nukes they have now just the medium ones would destroy have the world there just are no winners in a nuclear war. Hence why they haven’t been used besides WW2 My best advice would be to move to an area that has the best chance of financial success outside the US. Now what do I mean well I view the US kind of in that end zone of right before the USSR collapsed so what I would do is view emerging up and coming countries where I can invest and bank where I believe my money and investments will go not only farther but be more protected. Keep your chins up after all it’s only the end of the world ;)
All very well moving somewhere , but you will have to be there before the war , in a place with a garden , animals and a water source , also weapons to defend yourself and solid assets like gold or silver , Because when the sh1t hits the fan getting to your escape place would be almost impossible without a private plane
@@MaryGwenDungan they'll be the first ones you'll have to 'keep at bay', because they know you possess survival gear. The second or thrid wave will have better equipment to challenge you though, just a matter of time
You private plane will be of no use. EM fields make flight instruments futile and you're flying directly into radioactive clouds. You should be there before the war, and instead of isolation, try gang up with the largest group of people. In most countries, weapons are not publicly available and your chances rise if you team up with the strongest (those owning firearms). You can also throw away your gold: nothing will be valuable as medical pills, a wool blanket or water purifiers.
If a Country does not have a nuclear weapon or hosts one then chances are you will not be a target. If you are in North America you should get out with the exception of perhaps Southern Mexico as a quick escape. Southern Africa is also a good possibility. Good agricultural possibilities and opportunity to do that easily.
Well, in a case of a nuclear war, Australia and New Zeeland are also wiped out, so as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan... they are sending weapons to Ukraine and helping them.
Umm, no. New-Zealand will not be wiped out. I know, I’m a New-Zealand who actually lives in New-Zealand so I actually know a lot more about our geopolitical situation and military situation than you.
@@evannelson4479 Is NewZeeland delivering weapons to Ukraine? Is it an ally of US and UK, like Australia? 🤔 I am not sure. This guy mentions Norway, Switzerland and Iceland, I mean he is completely crazy: in a nuclear war all those 3 countries are wiped out from the face of the Earth, they become radioactive wastelands. Argentina makes sense.
Im born canadian with a small transport company. Not just nuclear war that concerns me here. Id be willing to bet our dear justin would sell us out immediately to China. Ive been trying to convince my Colombian wife and kids to look into Argentina. I love their new president.
That narcissistic is already selling the country to China so yeah. I am also trying to convince my Colombian wife to move to Argentina. She prefers Chile.
Northern hemisphere is so polluted, 90 percent of pollution is generated in the northern hemisphere, Chile is further south and is probably the best place to live, survive and thrive.
@NigelHyphenJones China cares tremendously about air pollution, if you look at the charts for places like Schengen and Guangzhou over the last 5-10 years the pollution levels have fallen drastically. They just actually try to fix the problem and care about it rather than only doing stuff to pander to leftists and line their own pockets.
@NigelHyphenJones He's not talking about carbon, just pollution in general. All of the southern continents would be much safer in a nuclear war. No one is nuking the Amazon rainforest.
You missed something very important: access to your wealth. SWIFT ain't going to work if Western banks are all turned into radioactive glass. You need local wealth in your refuge country.
some models predict massive ozone depletion, which would be a big problem in both New Zealand and Iceland. Also continental climates would be expected to drop 30C while maritime climates would expect to drop 8C. That's a big part of the food production issue.
If you're in a population centre then weapons are much more then 20-30x more powerful as Hiroshima, asthey use multiple warheads in a small area, EACH is 20-30x. The combined effect is greater than the sum of their parts so being in Washington on judgment day would be like 200x more much more.
Contact us to find out how we can help you: nomadcapitalist.com/apply
Learn from the best by coming to our annual live event, NCL: nomadcapitalist.com/live/
If you liked this video, make sure to see where you can go in the "Age Of Disorder": ua-cam.com/video/nF9M543mldw/v-deo.html
when the nukes go off, the money in the banks will go to $0... Tax is irrelevent and the chances of of it being relevant again is almost 0 in the future. If you come to AU/NZ buy a farm on a creek. Fense it and graze sheep, cows, pigs, goats and chickens. Spend money on infrastructure and enjoy an awesome lifestyle now even if the nukes dont go off and pay the taxes as you get good roads, safe communitys outside the city problems and good schools with broadband. You can skimp every cent, bury your gold like the pirates of old and die that way too, alone with a treasure map to digital money that one EMP will wipe out for ever. Thats a false economy!
African countries
Thanks for giving evil the couple places they didn't know about, such silliness. Worried about financial security in all out war🤣. You can't run
South Africa wins this hands down. We even produce our own antibiotics and have the best climate on earth and we are an English speaking country.
Southern Hemisphere will also feel the least impacts from nuclear winter.
Two aliens are flying near earth , The first one says, "the dominant life form here have developed satellite based nuclear weapons."The second alien says, "Are they an emerging intelligence ?" The first one says,"I don't think so, they have it aimed at themselves. "
😂😂😂😂
You got me at two aliens 😂
😂😂😂😂
Love the logic ❤
:))) good one
Living in South Korea for three years made me realize that in a major global event, getting out in a hurry could be nearly impossible. I would also question assumptions that migration/transit policy won´t be changed in a flash in a major global event: consider how much travel was "locked down" in 2020-2021.
I agree. If you are not there I have doubts that any country will be letting anyone else in - citizen, resident or boat-person.
If you have the means of people such as Mr. Henderson then you have a private charter jet available.
Your 'plane' arrives without enough fuel to divert or "go" to anywhere.
Having no entry-permit is irrelevant, once you are "there" it is impossible to remove you, living conditions might be a bit tough for a while.
Can't even get out of town on Thanksgiving. Where the F do people think they're gonna go?
In a full nuclear exchange, we will not have time to escape to another country or even to get to a fallout shelter.
@@chesslover8829 exactly.
I am from Czech republic and here it got also pretty bad over last few years. People got unbelievably hostile to each other and it's getting worse year by year.
That's too bad. I have a special place in my heart for the Czechs. My parents escaped CZ in 1969 and now I'm wondering how to leave communist Canada before the shit hit's the fan.
What seems to be the problem exactly?
@NigelHyphenJones No it is not like western europe. Its safe and clean here.
Same in Australia !
@@MrPatvee sell everything and go. Thats what we did before commie trueDOPE closed off the country in 2021. I miss Canada and what it was before 2020😢
Doomsday bunkers. Seems like the worst people on earth are the ones who will survive.
Isn't that a kick in the head.
Doubt it.
Those are some of the most expensive tombs I've ever seen .
@@jeffspicoli5399 😆 🤣 😂
Just evicted the occupants,be creative.😮
How are they going to get to the bunkers in time? They have about a half hour tops.
Famous quote "Survivor's will ENVY the DEAD"
I think Nikita Kruschev said that "The living will envy the dead."
@@patrickbass3542Semantics.
As a Kiwi, if nuclear war doesn't get you, New Zealand taxes will.
Best comment so far hahaha
we don't have a CGT. I wish we did so i could go to aussie to live/work and not let them CGT me on my nz assets. if I was going to pay a CGT i'd rather pay it to my own country not to them jokers
And the food prices and interest rates not to mention the dodgy as government
That was a good one!
NZ doesn't have Land Tax, Stamp Duty or CGT. Try living in Australia and you'll know about TAXES. 😆
As someone who grew up in the 70’s & 80’s and has lived in Central Virginia between DC & Naval Station their whole life, this conversation has always amused me. My whole life I’ve known if there was a strike, I’m dead immediately or soon after. There would be no opportunity “escape” it. I’ll continue to prepare to retire outside the US but nuclear war is the least of my concerns.
There have been literal decades where everyone thought we were on the brink of nuclear war all the time. And to be fair, it may have been quite close from time to time. Yet it didn’t happen. It’s an uttter lose lose situation for everyone involved.
Michelle you can move out of the target zones before the strikes.
@@icarus166 Yeah! It's never happened so it never will. See how ignorant that sounds?
@@feoxorus How do you suggest they think instead?
The notion that people can prepare for what happens after a nuclear strike is a very dangerous idea. It makes the people who have their finger on the button underestimate the horror and gamble on it.
Nowhere if the sun doesn't shine for 5 years.
The sun only has to slightly dim for a year and that's already enough to wipe out billions. A super volcano can do it and a nuclear conflict absolutely will.
The sun will always shine, nuclear war is bullshit.
Scandinavia basically doesn't get it for 8 months, so they're kiiiiiiiiiiinda used to it
Nuclear Winter is unrealistic Soviet model used to lower war risks in 1970th. Lots of not happening factors were added to the model, from immediate detonations of most of bi partisan nuclear arsenals to ashes magically floating in higher lairs of atmosphere much longer, then it can physically be there, because of gravity etc.
Too long fires with too much ashes getting to the atmosphere counted...
That's why they all are getting ready to hit each other. Both AuUKUS and Tehran-Moscow-Beijing axle hoping to win, outlast and outsmart during nuclear war.
It's a nuke not a gigantic meteorite or super volcano.
How pathetic we human beings are. We have been given a beautiful world to enjoy and we spend time thinking of ways to destroy it. Humanity is messed up
That's because of greed and racism.
Elites aren’t really human
Totally agree.. In terms of leadership, we're still trying to function in a diverse world with anti-diverse "my-way-or-the-highway" leadership.
I wish the leaders would fight it out in a boxing ring ….. because the rest of us don’t want war!
Yeh Nah just the 1% of mega minds that want to rule it all,and dont want to share it
My ex husband has been scared of nuclear war destroying the northern hemisphere for 13 years. He moved our family to Brazil in 2012. His job is online. That’s how he survives. We purchased a rural property, which he figured we (me and the kids) could produce food, if needed. He had an affair and abandoned me. I wouldn’t suggest moving to Brazil. Women love to throw themselves at Americans and take advantage of them. But besides that, there is a lot of corruption there. If the world goes into crisis, these SH countries will be affected financially, which will lead to mass poverty, social uprisings, and violence everywhere. If you live rural, you aren’t exempt from thugs finding you and killing you for whatever they want. We had an old neighbor who was robbed at gun point while milking his cows. I don’t think you’ll be safe anywhere in the world. Trust God and pray.
Also, getting into these countries isn’t easy, so you’d better be already living there by the time the nukes fly. And if people find out you’re American, they will try to take advantage of you financially.
Worst advice ever, just because what happend to you. You are stupid if you don’t have guns during those times and even during times like now. You should have a gun, it’s naive to walk around without it in South America or North America. An Assault rifle will protect me. Also
Corruption is not important if you want to survive. Assault rifle, remote house and knowledge of plans/fishing etc. Is.
@@Wessel3453 Just a PSA: Fishing/Hunting in the NH will likely not be a viable option due to contamination, particularly in the US. Case in point, the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands houses a few ships that were used in nuclear tests over 60 years ago. As a result, a good deal of the fish are contaminated and can't be eaten, even today. Watersheds will likely be completely compromised in the near term after an exchange post-fallout.
Also, in the event of a full exchange, growing food above the tropics will be a challenge.
Blame your asshole husband not the local women
Poor americans, people taking advantage on the country that has taken advantage of the world for the last 70 years....
True
Argentinian here. You people are delirious. The moment the silent subs start launching death you ain't getting nowhere, you must be here already. Second, you wont avoid the chaos, the countries not hit by the nukes will go into inner turmoil, and you will experience first hand a good-old-military coup, which we already had 4 (thanks to the US btw), and you will have to deal with local "rebels" trying to rob you (we ain't starving, we do anything to survive) and a bully government squeezing you dry now and then. It wont be fairytales at the end of the rainbow, it will be another form of hell, one you will be too old and too unprepared to face. The only thing you will achieve by buying land here is to gentrify the locals, even more. You cannot buy a piece of paradise, you have to build it:
Argentina is your country, the only requirement to be Argentinian is to love Argentina. What does that even mean? You think Argentina is the land? the history? the traditions, the soccer team? none of that. It's the people, an invisible string of warmth that pierce us and brings affection even among strangers, that make us break personal space and care about people we don't know, something you big city folk no longer have. If you want this place to take care of you when the world is trying to kill you, don't be like the people tearing it up apart, don't come and "buy land", "get papers", "do business" and boast your shinny foreign currency while gentrifying everyone else. Come here and buy your home, not a house, your home, bring your family, bring your business, its brainpower, technology, risk it here, take the gable, you will lose, but its ok you will be fine, its not about winning because the world already lost, get out of your private neighborhood, meet the local people, make friends, take care of them, they will take care of you. Love this place and you will live in a chaotic peace while the rest of the world dies. Or be boring and go to Chile.
Love Argentina!!
Looking at setting up a home there.
SO I DO NOT MEAN TO SOUND DISRESPECTFUL AT ALL.
They just voted a conservative/pro Argen minded president. Saying the right things so far.
BUT:
1. Will the Globalist socialist let him live or function effectively? We shall see
2. Will the socialist minded voters vote him out?
3. Will the socialist do another coup and stick in a Khan?
So in saying that, Argentina future is in the hands of the people to make right choices and hold the puppet politicians accountable. Or will the revert back to what they were and like Venezuela? We shall see I guess
Well said
As a Brazilian i totally agree! How lucky and blessed we are to be latinos and to live in such underful lands...
Too bad for the refugees who will make it here, cause by the time they arrive they go'n have to manage to survive here and fight our people in our lands...
How? Its not as easy as you make it seem. I would take up the challenge. The USA is dying and I want to get out.
@@FallacyAsPraxis its much easier than trying to survive in a post apocalytic USA and thats for sure!
Best place is....CHILE, The radiation is blocked by the Andes Mountains and the pacific ocean wind blows the bad air. It's like having you back to the bad stuff.
Did you mean- Having yoyr back away from the bad stuff
The communists are winning there though, even while they are losing everywhere else.
@@Sketchbook9999if you know then why ask?
@@Sketchbook9999 Read the words. Use logic before you pose stupid questions.
Nuclear winter , you either freeze to death in Chile or have no food.
Kurzegesagt explained this rather well. There's no escaping nuclear war. In the Northern Hemisphere billions of people will die in the famine that ensues after the atmosphere dims. Gruesomeness at a scale humans have never encountered before. It will be like The Road. The Southern Hemisphere stands a better chance and those countries will simply be invaded by whichever militaries are still left to annex the crops and feed their troops.
Why would the northern hemisphere be screwed? Even in the mountainous areas where more wind 💨 and blockage from outside bebris? Just curious. Legit answer please
@@loganpraetorian Wind currents will deposit radioactive fallout even in the valleys. Then the wind currents will cross over the equator and do the same to the Southern hemisphere. There will be no "safe" place. Even if you don't get fatally dosed in Argentina you will get enough exposure to cause genetic damage. Survivors anywhere will breed mutants if they are not sterile.
@@loganpraetorianmountainous regions do not grow vegetables ;)
@@rivenoakthen stock up on all that insect-based protein that is being promoted 😂.
@@loganpraetorian It's not radiation that you need to be worried about. Modern nukes have very little of that. It's the stratospheric ash (no winds or precipitation up there) that will dim the sunlight enough to make harvests fail for a couple of years. That's enough to make billions starve to death and set our civilization back for centuries. We might not even recover that fast, if at all, as we've blown through all the easily accessible coal reserves to kick start a new industrial revolution.
Better to prep and stay put where you are, than fleeing somewhere and be a stranger, a target, there.
It's likely only the super-rich would have the means to flee, and they would likely have some armed security people with them. I don't know, they might make it a little longer than the rest of us, but personally, I wouldn't want to be one of them, I'm happy to go out with most of humanity.
Meek is higher intelligence, quiet, is inner wisdom. Strength is superior ability to acclimate. Love is to be humble . Care for one another. Know who is good and how to stealthily methodically deal with evil.
Nuclear Winter will affect the entire world for 10 years after nuclear war. It won't matter where you live.
A better discussion would be, how, we as common people can do to stop our elected authorities, keep escalating the aggression to at not returning point, and reach the nuclear wzr.
They created this war Stop electing them. They made you feel like it's your right to vote? I say exercise your right not to vote in politicians who created a hostile totalitarian ghetto in America. They've dumbed society beyond thinking for themselves.
This is probably the only human and rational comment I've read here.
The only solution I can think of is second amendment: they want the common man and woman to die meanwhile they keep getting rich: enough is enough!
You nailed it! 🎯
Absolutely correct ❤
The trick is leaving before the bomb drops.
And hide where?
Do you think they'll post the date, time and location of the first strike on Facebook? I hope you do not. This isn't 1952, you won't get days or hours while they fuel missiles or fly bombers to the target zone. The most notice you will get is about 30 minutes, and much less if they are launched from a boomer or Club-K.
better a year early, than a day late.
@@reditelj
In a far far away planet
@@nightowl7261….Mizar 5 people have to shout to stay alive. 😂
First off, bugging out after the first bomb drops is a horrible strategy. So if you've got a safe haven, move there before catastrophe strikes (or within easy commute distance). After that, it's the southern hemisphere. The west coast of a continent (outside the blast radius), preferably with mountain ranges between you and target locations. The eastern rain shadow of a major mountain range, well away from major population centers (northern Rockies, Siberia, etc). Any location will need to be able to produce food (even in a 3yr nuclear winter) and have the resources to produce power (not strictly essential). Availability off safe drinking water goes without saying.
Argentina sounds like a good choice now. Good possibility of having good grow in the next 10 years
Yes good choice!
That's an interesting perspective! Argentina does hold promise for growth in the coming years. We've discussed the potential developments in Argentina in detail in this video: ua-cam.com/video/UYs4DCEsdBI/v-deo.html. It's worth considering as you explore your options.
I don't think Argentina is a good place, because Argentina doesn't have large quantities of petroleum, and to produce gasoline you need many other inputs... and we shouldn't forget that fertilizer is needed for plantations
@@koba1980 Argentina's total primary energy mix is dominated by natural gas (55%) and oil (33%), with bioenergy contributing 5%, and hydropower and nuclear another 3% each. Argentina has the 2nd largest reserve of shale gas and the 4th largest reserve of shale oil worldwide. I hope this helps, Vodek
@@vodekz1534 Argentina suffers from constant blackouts and all inputs for gasoline production are imported, in addition to fertilizer for production, not to mention the declining economy. Everything Argentina has is just enough for its population and if 30 million migrants enter Argentina everything will collapse quickly.
Im in asia and already digging 20ft below a bunker in one of the mountains here were me and my dog hide if nukes started flying. And also start a deep well 100 ft deep for my water source. Had stock of canned foods and dog foods to last for 5 yrs and boxes of batteries. I think thats better than doing nothing.
People are forgetting Tsunamis from weapons deployed in Oceans .
Minor compared to tsunamis.
@DavidPaulNewtonScott , Actually worse . It's called Radiation
It seems I have scored already with my house in a valley in Central Portugal 🇵🇹
I would not worry about international visas in the event of a nuclear war..
That would be the last ting to worry about, actually travelling to where you want to go is a far larger concern.
Yes. Plus, the immigration laws would change within hours. Aussies couldn't get back to Aus during Covid, you think immigrants are getting let in during a nuclear war? Illegal immigrants who come to Australia by boat are towed back, right now, and it's peacetime.
Plus you need your own plane in the back yard to fly... It was even difficult to go to another city in Canada during COVID.. imagine if bombs are flying. How can you travel
I think we are overlooking the simple fact planes aren’t going anywhere if this happens . 21 hours flight to NZ not too many airlines taking that gamble .
How about private jets??
@@samlawaniunscripted is your fuelled and ready to go ?
And just how many of your aircraft's electronic systems do you think will still be functioning after an atomic blast?
@@samlawaniunscripted There's an EMP after a nuclear blast. All electronics are disabled. You're not going anywhere
@@officialrivv they aren't disabled for days tho...
Im from Ecuador and I feel any South-American country will be safe, self-sustainable and a good place to be if there is a Nuclear War. Most of these countries won't get in the War game or their involvement will be more political than actual warfare.
Just got to stay alive in Ecuador gang wars before the nuclear war and you'll be good to go!
You LIVE in the "war game" whether you want to admit it or not. The fallout will cross the equator, the models prove it and so does the evidence from previous testing and accidents.
It's impossible to get away from a nuclear attack lol unless you go underground.
It's the end of human civilization. if you manage to survive you will wish you would instead die.
If the bomb doesn't kill you then the nuclear radiation will, even if it doesn't kill you the nuclear winter will.
Only option is go underground and have a storage of food that will last 15yrs minimum so the nuclear winter will pass but even after that all crops an nature will be destroyed and the world is pretty much a desert idk how humans will be able to grow stuff again cuz everywhere it will be affected by radiation
Venezuela might, actually.
@@captflam5266 Dont think so, that's outdated data from 1990's. All border problems are resolved. We are in very good relations with Peru.
An all out Nuclear War will mean the survivors will wish they died in that war.
Exactly!
I believe , that the WHOLE point of his video is to learn to live as best you can and not give in to fear . Become educated in being mobile as well as flexible. In addition, helping others ( to me) from a business perspective , and the feedback of it, helps me keep my ear to the ground
I have moved to a quiet souther african country that has never experienced any war in last 100 years
Lesotho?
Namibia? That's my uneducated guess.
@helenamuniz5269 can you document on how the place is .
@@Muriithitalksfootball Well don't take my words for it, There are Countless videos made by UA-camrs about Namibia,Its all on UA-cam and are mostly Positive Remarks...been there myself,I can attest To the fact the Country Seats well with me if anything bad Pops up in the West. Its depends on what you are looking for My Friend,Maybe somethings about the Country may not seat well with you,But its Perhaps one of the Top safest Nations In Africa,Like I Said...There are Germans & Europeans who are living Peacefully there.
@@helenamuniz5269Thank you for your valuable information! I have watched many videos on Namibia and its capital. I've been positively impressed, but you are the first person I've come across on the internet who has been there several times and can attest to the quality of life.
Being of German descent myself (Nofziger), but living in California, I take your impressions and experiences to heart. I would imagine that you are talking about moving to the capitol city. Correct?
In my view, you can run, but you can’t hide. I’m staying in the U.S. and strengthening relationships with my immediate neighbors/community. As for a potential nuclear war, we all need to pray that the US will be able to safely transition/collapse as the world’s unipolar empire in an orderly manner without taking humankind into the abyss as well.
Nothing in the US will survive if nuclear war breaks out. Some places in the Southern Hemisphere *might* survive, because the clouds will circulate and the soot will fall mostly in the north. That's it. No one north of the equator will survive.
The problem is that even if you went to a tropical island in the middle of no where, is that all those thousands and thousands of nukes, even if they only hit the major cities. All that toxic nuclear waste would go into the atmosphere and poison the air killing most animals and humans, not to mention the food being poisoned and the sun being blocked. It's not a video game that's just mass extinction.
Yeah, not speaking radioactive tsunami all around, so those islands poor of infrastructures expose you to deadly radiations sooner. It's GAME OVER, and the moment the red button is pressed, all of your money didn't matter anymore.
Exactly my points,there will be no hiding place,believe it.🤔
You will need an optimal location and an underground bunker with filtered air. Only extreme preppers will survive.
All the survivors who hid in bunkers don’t know how to do anything that requires physical labor. It will be a bunch of guys telling each other they’re late and to tuck in their shirt and that there is a meeting at 4:00.
Pretty much.....
They need a labor force to do anything productive. Only problem, if civil authority collapses everyone becomes their own nation.
Tell your western politicians or leaders to start taking action towards “PEACE “and stop provoking a nuclear war and then no one needs to move anywhere.Wouldn’t that be the sensible topic to talk about than telling people where to move because some idiots have bunkers somewhere?Stop running away from yourself and talk about Peace,Love and Understanding because nobody can survive in this world without this few words.
Best comment on this video.
Very naive comment. Good luck with that. Here’s a unicorn 🦄
The thing is you don't have control over what politicians do e.g WW2. But you can atleast be prepared for it
Sorry , this comment is way too rational for modern times .
We have and we do, but they have stolen our vote and are trying to push us to fight each other. But never count us out.. the people of the US understand more than ever what our 7:40 government has done; we are trying to put it right, but these people will not go without a fight. We have to win the war of information.
By the way, America's biggest spy base outside of America (pine gap) is located in Australia.
It's probably 5 eye base new zealand.
Australia is inside America
Keep it quiet will yah.
Australia is suitable but don’t be anywhere near Canberra, Alice Springs, Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, Darwin, Adelaide, Exmouth or Townsville.
@@SanctuaryLife tassie is pretty safe, particularly the west.
Turn the questions you ask your clients into software so the people that don’t meet your income requirements can at least make a plan toward something
Andrew, cash is being weined out in Aus and New Zealand, as we speak. I'm worrying I wont be able to buy food soon. I only use cash. We're scared down here.
Take the mark ?
@@----79821 Your bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies will not be allowed to compete with the official currency, you need to buy tangible assets - like land. If you only see your cryptos as speculative investments and realize that in the event of a nuclear war they will be erased by the EMP, go for it.
@@----79821nah brah. I'm just gonna carry gold bullion around with me
Prépare garden , live stock learn survival skills , Aus and NZ are lucky people your survival rate is high . I’m in the middle of Europe. We are basically doomed after a nuclear strikes on both sides .
buy crypto asap, fiat currency is losing its power, crypto literally only gains value, its built to
Might be worth noting an event like nuclear war would bring a lot of uncertainty. I wasn't able to return to NZ during covid despite having a NZ passport. Maybe having a yacht to sail off into the horizon would be a better option.
I live in Scotland and I have seen on another documentary about safe places to go to in event of a nuclear war that The Shetland Islands are the safest place to escape to so I guess I'll be going there!
As long as you don't get any fallout from Holy Loch
Ben on the Suspicious Observers Channel has an earth disaster video in his playlist about the coming Solar Flash and Polar Shift that is predicted to happen in most of our life times!! He also does space weather every day too about the solar flares and has been very accurate so far!!! Its a great channel just like this channel, because his videos tell you where the safe zones are to are also!! This is definitely something to be concerned about especially if you live on the coast, low elevation, and where there aren't any caves. Since there are so many other things to be concerned about I'm very grateful for this excellent channel also!!! Thank you Andrew for all you do!!!!
I was born in Argentina, but live in the US for the last 30 yrs. I think Uruguay would be agreat place too. Great weather, food, and the most stable country in South America
Good luck finding means of transportation after a generalized nuclear strike. In 1992, I overflew the state of Florida right after hurricane Andrew swept by. I was ferrying a Cessna C188B (a crop duster aircraft) from Missouri all the way to Southern Brazil. That looked a bit like a post nuclear destruction scenario and most of the telecom network was down. Miami ARTCC had been transferred to St Petersburg. Flight watch and FSS were all down. They could not hear me on VHF, I could barely hear them. I landed in KFXE (Ft Lauderdale Exec) with a waiver and lights signal system from the tower. All flights were cancelled. So maybe having your own Gulfstream (or a fractional of one) might be a good thing if you wanna flee amidst the chaos. 😎
Nuclear Winter would most likely start in North Hemisphere first, and - because of the ITCZ (Inter Tropical Convergence Zone) -, might be confined to it for a while, because of the North & South hemispheres winds circulation. However, the oceans are not (confined). Once the contamination spreads across the seas, the rain over both halves of the Globe would not be exactly "healthy". Each and every form of life would end up ruined.
If the current turbo-cancer "pandemic" (I wonder what the cause would be...👀) is kill1ng people all over the planet, wait till nuclear radiation is all over the place.
I also wonder if surviving a nuclear holocaust would be a blessing or a curse (like living in some sort of "The Walking Dead" or "Mad Max" scenarios, degrading human kind back to tribalism, barbarism etc) especially if one has kids... sorry if I sound pessimistic. If you wanna settle in South America as in a Holocaust Plan B, then welcome. 😎🥂
Don’t worry soon he will pretend he Is so rich that he has a ufo
@@zerma6 🤣🤣🤣
Good luck with finding transport, there will be no fresh air to breathe with let alone travel.
The question of the ocean being polluted is an interesting one. Radioactive isotopes are heavy so would likely sink to the bottom. But all the ash and soot and stuff would likely mess up the oceans, even in the south.
For whatever it's worth, I think that Perth along with the entire West Coast, Darwin, maybe Tasmania and South Africa would be very good choices. Although in Darwin or the Kimberly, you might eventually die of boredom.
Has China designated Australia for nuke strikes?
@@juliuscesar4176 Good question.
Andrew, love your variety of topics and suggest you investigate the upcoming catastrophe of the reversal of the magnetic poles or the end of the gulfstream and the upcoming Ice Age for the Northern Hemisphere.
There is a reason that all apocalyptic fiction points out that the other humans are the real danger. Social cohesion would not exist and you would struggle to find and keep any resources that were left. The best place would have the most resources to fewest people ratio.
New Zealand
Kiwis will probably start downing planes if huge fleets are coming in there in a ww3 survival scenario.
@@davidthomson692 And Australia. Assuming it isn't targeted.
Not an easy topic to address, on many levels. Appreciated you did.
South America sounds good to me.
If it goes down, your best personal outcome is to be at the epicenter on impact. If you're elsewhere and you survive impact, the question isn't if you will bite it, it's how long it will take & how crappy an experience it will be.
I think if I survived with my daughter, the worst thing would be watching her starve or dye of radiation poisoning. Think I'll opt out of trying to survive the first wave and live like tomorrow will come.
Reminds me of a scene from Star Trek IV where Captain Kirk and Spock are on a bus in 1980’s San Francisco. There’s a punk with a loud stereo playing “Let’s just push the button we’d be better off dead” Not an actual song btw but I totally get it
Mammoth Caves in Kentucky and Carlsbad Caverns in New Mexico are two places that come to mind.
@@JS-ki5yq Your own backyard.
The entire northern hemisphere will be a death zone.
@@juliuscesar4176 Oh heck, why don't you just include the whole planet, NostrilDamus?!!
@@jameswest4819 You sound triggered. The studies from the 80s predict that even if only of fraction of the total US-USSR (now Russia) arsenals were deployed, the dust clouds would cover the northern hemisphere. The nuclear winter they predicted would be very bad. They produced a map which showed temperature drop of in America between -20.Temp drop at the equator would be around -5. The decrease in sunlight will eliminate crop production in the northern hemisphere. Animals will be eaten. Nothing will grow. It will be massive graveyard. That bunker in your backyard will be your grave.
As a Kiwi who lives in Australia as a permanent resident, the taxes and the cost of living will get your ass in both countries. 😂😅 but it's amazing to call both countries my home ❤
Correct the taxes are bad. They will go up a few points after a total nuclear Holocaust.
a lot of people don't know this but nuclear fallout wont be as major as people think as long as you stay away from big cities and military targets you will have a chance to survive
Survive, maybe, the world will be fucked for centuries likely if all goes well
The wind will carry radioactive dust and deposit it on 100% of the earth's surface.
One ICBM, and it would never be just one, would hammer this planet so harshly that most folks that survive the localized detonation would die a miserable death without any available or viable medical intervention. If I were privy to an impending nuclear attack, I’d probably walk towards the epicenter rather than be the sole survivor and king of my mountain of debris.
I have to agree with you. There are so many things worse than dying immediately in the event of an ICBM nuke.
no they already tested a lot of them in Siberia and the pacific and it was not a big deal to those far away from the explosion
During a world crisis. International flights will be mostly grounded or not exist. Choose a large continent and get around by ground..
South America
@@gustavogoncalves3900The problem with Argentina/Chile is once the nuclear winter starts and crops start failing all the Countries from Brazil, Columbia, Venezuela, Peru, will start migrating south and start fighting for the little remaining resources left, the best place to be is in a self sustaining island with large reserves of non-perishable food.
@@wiseoldwizard brazil is Southern hemisphere
You have roughly between 6 and 32 minutes (depending the launch platform) to be in the air. So unless you own or have 24/7 access to a private jet (i.e., you a billionaire) you likely toast. Having a second residency should be the least of one’s concern. The only way this makes sense is to be gone before the event (be in the know) and leave ahead of time.
Everyone should listen to the recent interview by Lex Fridman of Annie Jacobsen. Details this scenario very well and how futile it would be for humans even if one was able to survive the initial blast / fallout.
If you have a boat, you have a chance.
You'll be able to see when WW3 starts, Russia invading NATO country, you have 48/72 hours to leave.
Having a place to go is good. Being proactive and adaptable is just as important. You never want to be the guy standing there with a WTF expression and no clue what to try next.
My garden shed is pretty strong may have to put double glazing on it though and put a chain on the thing to steak in the ground.Should be Good to go then hopefully but failing that Easter Island
Go to Hawaii and move into Zuckerbergs bunker
In the case of a nuclear war I can assure you Russia would have a spare nuke directed at Zuckerberg island. Just to make sure he wouldn't laugh. They have 5000. Definitely Zuckerberg would be on the list.
@@samirods All the "New World Order" leaders, the globalist "elites", the UN, WEF, WHO and EU headquarters are on the Russian list, you can bet about that, and also the residences of the ones that provoke the war.
The best solution seems to be to get rid of our warmongering governments.
His bunker must be touching the volcanoes underneath that he’ll get cooked.
Kuai sounds like a great place to squat.
Thanks for the suggestion 😂
Thanks for covering this Andrew! Joel Skousen’s book Strategic Relocation covers all of this including maps with primary and secondary nuclear targets. Bugging out to Australia, SE Asia or NZ is not the best strategy because in the next world war it’s expected that the CCP will attempt to take these areas over.
Joel mentioned places like Uruguay as good options. Even some of the freedom states had a very high ranking.
Furthermore island are cut off from the imports they require during war. That includes Hawaii.
Are you aware that a certain U.S. general said when he retired that the CCP has intentions to take Taiwan by 2027, and the malware in the US power grid was to be used to disrupt their power distribution when the 🇹🇼invasion begins.
I think in the event of a nuclear exchange between US and Russia, theres no way we can move using planes or plan a regular trip, by Sea may be it will be possible to move. Mayor information services and communications will be down and power plants and oil supply will be out of the reach for general public. We will have a food crisis everywhere and it will take some time to recover some kind of order and good exchange needed to operated our modern live styles. Big cities can't survive without energy so there will be a massive migration to rural areas anyway. Probably best place in my opinion is Chile over argentina, because we are protected by two huge mountain formations forming a long valley over 2500 kilometers long, with mountains in the north, East, and West. Im ready here so im set 😁
Simple system: buy a sailboat and sail to the South Seas. You can stay on the high seas for weeks, sometimes months. Virtually free rides and there's no shortage of fish.
The ocean and storms are scary
Tsunami. And radioactive tsunami too. Most people seems not to understand what a nuclear war means. It mean: around -20° C the whole world, extreme climatic events, most of those fishes will be contaminated. It's not Hollywood.
That's what I would have done if I was a younger man. Though I know a long time sailor who pointed out piracy is not out of the question on the high seas. Way out in the middle of nowhere you could find yourself in a pickle. And if civilization truly breaks down, those pickles could become quite common.
Have you actually sailed a boat a long distance ?@@darioinfini
@@JamesPilkenton-se5cx No why?
New Zealand is also Five Eyes ...
True but I think wai hopai spy base has closed..so possibly no physical targets of significance
I think New Zealand has investments from enough Russian and Chinese billionaires that it wouldn't be in their interest to shoot a nuke down there either. But New Zealand actually is overall pretty neutral for a western aligned country, after all they did get kicked out of ANZUS for not letting US Naval vessels dock due to nuclear fears and doesn't have a Free Trade Agreement with the USA (But it does with China).
@@riptyurass302 thanks for your information. Do you live in NZ?
@@rfggibson Yes I do :)
I worry about some of the countries you mentioned becoming more brutal in a global event. Not sure you would be all that safe in some countries in S. America for example, if the world shut down.
As if any place would maintain order in that event. Pure marketing ploy
@@KeepingItRealBro Fair point, but I do think certain cultures are more aggressive and less communal than others. Even in this video it is mentioned how the US has become more brutal. I think an important factor is to realize certain cultures will be less supportive than others. Hard to deny.
I will go to the bathroom. The safest place on earth! Bring it on.
You'll be doing your own nuking in the bathroom 😂
Not after you've been in there. I heard about you. Need to clear the bathroom for 24 hours afterwards
At least you won't shit your pants.
Hide in the bathroom while your house is on fire.
I was thinking under my bed would do
Your video is awesome and full of rare wisdom that most Americans will not be able to receive.
I live in Lima Peru. I watched the scientific studies (4 of them, i recollect); that it would take 2 weeks for the fallout from the northern hemisphere to blow downwind to here. I don't know if Lima would get hit (there are enough bombs for every major city on Earth); I would prefer to live behind the northen mountains. MINIMUM: iodine pills, gas masks; lots of water
I feel quite safe in Oxapampa. I very much doubt that any nuclear weapons are targeted toward Perú.
I've lived in the Philippines for the last 6 years. It's a GREAT place to live, and retire. EVERYONE speaks English. And, MOST food is locally produced...
everyone speaks english pathetic
@@MuzharJamaluddin English is the OFFICIAL language of the Philippines. It was enshrined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution. What is pathetic about that?
China will likely attempt a takeover of the Philippines
Nuclear Winter will affect the entire world for 10 years after nuclear war. It won't matter where you live.
Read that The Philippines recently strengthened their partnership with the US, with the us investing in their economy and military also running maritime drills and exercises over there in the south china sea etc so if thing might escalate the Philippines will be in the thick of it alongside Japan vs China
Waiting for those property investments to finally blow up in value...
Explosive take
Pick which ever one you like for free.
Lol. 🤣
Iceland's problem is food production. Iceland imports a billion dollars of food a year for a population of 400k. Most of that is probably grain and produce. And good luck surviving a nuclear winter there. You're better off closer to the equator.
Yes, so that's Russia out of the equation too
@@voice.of.reason All of Russia and the US will be gone. That's where most of the nukes will fall. All other nuclear armed countries will be gone too, ironically.
Exactly. Here we have a video telling us where to go in case of a nuclear war and not a word about fallout, radiation, nuclear winter etc. Go to Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.... The most braindead thing I have seen for a while.
Mixing up priorities here…
If you’re looking to survive, you pay whatever the price is - including taxes.
If you want to get to Australia without $10m and you’ve a week to do it before Brandon sits on the big red button, fly commercial to Papua New Guinea or East Timor via Singapore, then look at the “independent cruise sector” to take in the wilderness coasts of far north Queensland or Northern Territory. Virtually no one there, brutal climate, a menagerie of animals lining up to kill and/or eat you. But nobody will know your there. It’s actually happening *right now* and the politicians have no idea how to police - there are thousands of kms of coastline.
But if you’re desperate, right…?
Can anyone talk about Brazil as an option? It looks interesting, although confusing...
I've seen a few of these WWIII videos on this channel now. I'm grateful for the information, but I'm interested to know why the tropical, fertile, (generally) politically neutral Caribbean islands are never mentioned as safe havens in the event of nuclear fallout...🤔. I know the social infrastructure isn't the best in the world but neither are the facilities in the equally beautiful Pacific islands. I'd be happy to hear anyone's good insights.
In the event of nuclear war, being anywhere near Eastern US is the most dangerous. Russia has the poseidon nuke sub just parked in the Atlantic right now. It produces a 300 ft wall of nuclear water capable of wiping out the eastern shoreline of the US(and likely impact carribean). If nukes are flying then Russia moves into check mate quickly. Theres no way to stop the poseidon if it launches. Absurd the US would be poking the bear at this stage is beyond insanity.
Shhhh, Fruits and vegetables are abundant, along with the marine food source.
My place in the usvi will come in handy
Russia has now parked their boats on Cuba
Porque varios de los países caribeños serían atacados
Las islas bajo dominio estadounidense, Puerto Rico y hasta Cuba por su lugar estratégico
Prácticamente toda la zona sería devastada, y las islas que no sucumbiría al caos social y hambruna
(having to traveled to these countries myself in the past): Your suggestion of Argentina is excellent: it has a lot of food, and open spaces. Big NO for Fiji: it has a dense population (and China drug gangs traffic through Fiji to Australia.)
Switzerland is overrated. if a nuke hits Paris or anywhere near in EU the alps aren't gonna save anyone. Even if they have bunkers for the whole population, they might survive but then what? I'd rather be far away on an island
What do you think about the Caribbean? Virgin Islands? for safe areas?
I would look at whether those places could feed themselves currently without imports. Let’s say there is a nuclear war between the US +nato, versus Russia and China. The reality, is that once you remove northern countries like US, Canada, Russia, Ukraine, Western Europe etc. A large percentage of the global food production is gone without taking into account dust blocking out the sun for any period of time and also whether other major food producers like Argentina, Brazil, or Australia are hit as well..
Also In any post nuclear world, people need to take into account that locals in places that somehow survive, may be outright hostile to foreigners because resources will be scarce and they may blame outsiders for the war.
@@redstone5062 True. One of the main factors I was looking at was local fresh water, a-lot of the islands in the American virgin islands have no natural or local sources for drinking water. Places like the Dominican Republic and Jamaica do though.
@@GEN_X_ I think Dominican Republic would be a difficult because neighbouring Haiti is already a failed state and people there would be desperate and spill over. Jamaica could be a possibility. Maybe parts of Central America like Costa Rica or Belize but Panama would have a big bullseye on it because of the canal. In the Atlantic, the Azores would be ideal due to low population and available food and fresh water. The problem is Portugal is in NATO and the US has a base on one the islands. So at the very least, the island hosting the base would be targeted.
The best way to plan this 10 years ago. Cheers 🥂
South of chile entered the chat
i was thinking Fantasy Island would be the best followed by Gilligans Island
Hear me out: how about Amity Island? It's close to some targets, sure, but that gives and takes! The sharks nearby will probably mutate into gargantuan monsters who will guard your "moat" from marauding bands of looters and, worse, skinny dipping teens.
With Ginger or May Anne?
@@anthonyiannozzi6777 the professor, but leave the rest
@@mauimixer6040 the choice is Ginger or Maryanne?
@@anthonyiannozzi6777 for you maybe. I'm learning not to wastey wishes, so I'll have Both ! I mean, it just wouldn't be nice of me to make either feel rejected. 😉, and I wouldn't feel good to break up the couple already, I'm just a nice guy. 😊😁😎🥳
Thailand always seem to make deals with both sides . It’s the only nation never colonized . But they close to China if it hits fan with them
I worked out years ago that NZ would be a good choice and emigrated here in 2008. I'm ex forces and applied forces thinking behind my decision. The isolation was a huge factor considering nuclear fallout and that lead to the next reason. Food wise in a desperate situation there's always cannibalism, yep, that desperate, but they both support my number one reason. Water. The west coast is known for rain and plenty of water. Clean water is more important than food.
But NZ is a NATO target as well.
@@ForbiddTV Our location means we will be a low hanging target. Our location will also be a place they want to "preserve" because it will hold uncontaminated water and become a reliable breadbasket for the winner. There WILL no doubt be targets here of importance but for the above reasons they would be strategically taken out, not eliminated via a nuclear weapon.
@@kevinsmith7287 Every place is essentially safe from the blasts and radiation, but to think NZ is somehow special is not a valid meme.
@@ForbiddTV No, not special, it just has better odds. If all the major players throw missiles at each other all the radioactive clouds, generally speaking, with be going around the equator and spreading, but not pole to pole. It's just a best guess for me, mind you we have a pole shift incoming so..... I just know I stand a better chance here than in London.
@@kevinsmith7287 I don't like the idea of being on an island. Is NZ self sufficient?
My husband is American and I am Peruvian American (I have double nationality) and I own a property in San Borja (Lima) unfortunately every time I go, I can observe more and more presence of CHINA over there… they are building a huge port over there (Similar they did in AFRICA) and now they own Phone Companies, Electricity and Water Companies that used to be independent before… and similar situations are going on in other parts of LATAM but regular people are not paying attention unfortunately.
The reality unfortunately is IF there is a NUCLEAR WAR there were no SAFE PLACE to go.
I live in Oxapampa, Perú, and I agree that China is trying very hard to take over everything that they can in Per, however, I don' think that this will result in Perú being a target of nuclear wrapons at any point. I actually think projects such as the port of Chancay may be of benefit to Perú in the future, perhaps even more after China collapses, which I expect it to do within the next ten years regardless of whether there is war. Also, where I live has a mild climate, sheltered geography, plenty of fresh water and everything grows, Even in event of nuclear winter I don't think it will be difficult to survive.
@@fernandodelcuadro Hermoso. Para mi, Oxapampa ofrece la mejor calidad de vida en el Perú. Por la herencia austroalemana, hay casas bonitas, quesos y chorizos estilo europeos, la mejor carne de Peru. Es un lugar tranquilo, rodeado de la naturaleza. Lo unico llueve mucho en los meses de diciembre hasta abril. Tambien la ruta para llegar desde Lima tiene muchas curvas, pero ya se va a construir el nuevo aeropuerto regional.
What you say about
Urugway, Paraguay?
We have talked about those countries in this video: ua-cam.com/video/JN6JhqFusPQ/v-deo.html
Paraguay and Uruguay are two countries extremely dependent on Brazil for food and energy, but if Brazil does not cut economic relations with its neighbors, both countries are better than Argentina, as the production and economic factor in an apocalyptic world has a great weight.
OK but which way is the best way😆
@@koba1980 paraguayan here, paraguay doesn't depends from those countries for food and energy, you're completely wrong, we produce our own food, top quality btw, two majors enery producers in south america are in Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil, the energy are shared between these countries, none of them are the owners, as the current crisis in argentina, paraguay and brazil are top producers of quality meat in south america, stability in paraguay are better than in brazil and argentina, so doors are opened for you here, give it a try, good place for investment and digital nomads, very few people
@@Lykkos-321
¿Cuántas gotas de petróleo produce el Paraguay?
Banks more than likely will close. Aircraft will be grounded. Roads will be jammed.
South Chile
Patagonia (Chile or Argentina) seems to be the best option
No where is 100% safe however the sub 40th parallel south is a half decent guideline
Strategic Relocation by Joel Skousen
The BEST PLACE...to go during nuclear war....is in the AMAZON....BRAZIL!!!
None of us would be able to survive the Amazon jungle with or without nuclear war.
Folks….Folks I was in the Air Force while Russians where flying nuclear bombers up and down out east and west coast always prepping for world war 3…….. there won’t be a nuclear war it will be economic with money or another proxy war think Afghanistan or Vietnam. The nukes they have now just the medium ones would destroy have the world there just are no winners in a nuclear war. Hence why they haven’t been used besides WW2
My best advice would be to move to an area that has the best chance of financial success outside the US. Now what do I mean well I view the US kind of in that end zone of right before the USSR collapsed so what I would do is view emerging up and coming countries where I can invest and bank where I believe my money and investments will go not only farther but be more protected. Keep your chins up after all it’s only the end of the world ;)
Dreaming. Delusional. No electricity, internet, water. Buy physical gold and land to live on. And seeds to plant ... if there is water and sunlight.
Finally some useful content
🤣
All very well moving somewhere , but you will have to be there before the war , in a place with a garden , animals and a water source , also weapons to defend yourself and solid assets like gold or silver ,
Because when the sh1t hits the fan getting to your escape place would be almost impossible without a private plane
If the place is accessible, it'll be contested. Better stock up on that private army and military supplies
@@MaryGwenDungan they'll be the first ones you'll have to 'keep at bay', because they know you possess survival gear. The second or thrid wave will have better equipment to challenge you though, just a matter of time
You private plane will be of no use. EM fields make flight instruments futile and you're flying directly into radioactive clouds. You should be there before the war, and instead of isolation, try gang up with the largest group of people. In most countries, weapons are not publicly available and your chances rise if you team up with the strongest (those owning firearms). You can also throw away your gold: nothing will be valuable as medical pills, a wool blanket or water purifiers.
I've got all of that,living in NewZealand
@@Michael-fo1we can you own guns in NZ?
Patagonia. Tierra del Fuego. Cities like Ushuaia, Punta Arenas, Bariloche or even Port Williams (Chile)
I already live in Australia 🎉🎉🎉
If a Country does not have a nuclear weapon or hosts one then chances are you will not be a target.
If you are in North America you should get out with the exception of perhaps Southern Mexico as a quick escape.
Southern Africa is also a good possibility. Good agricultural possibilities and opportunity to do that easily.
S. America, Peru, Chile, Argentina. In the area just west of Andes. Agricultural area.
Well, in a case of a nuclear war, Australia and New Zeeland are also wiped out, so as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan... they are sending weapons to Ukraine and helping them.
Umm, no.
New-Zealand will not be wiped out.
I know, I’m a New-Zealand who actually lives in New-Zealand so I actually know a lot more about our geopolitical situation and military situation than you.
@@evannelson4479 Is NewZeeland delivering weapons to Ukraine? Is it an ally of US and UK, like Australia? 🤔 I am not sure.
This guy mentions Norway, Switzerland and Iceland, I mean he is completely crazy: in a nuclear war all those 3 countries are wiped out from the face of the Earth, they become radioactive wastelands.
Argentina makes sense.
Where to Move to Escape Nuclear War; thank you for this interesting Topic. When do you think Nuclear War will Start this year?
The way Nuclear Fallout will work. Places like New Zealand will still be affected.
Im born canadian with a small transport company. Not just nuclear war that concerns me here. Id be willing to bet our dear justin would sell us out immediately to China.
Ive been trying to convince my Colombian wife and kids to look into Argentina. I love their new president.
You don't try, you command.
Your job is to protect your family and women are usually idiots when it comes to security sensitivity.
No offense
That narcissistic is already selling the country to China so yeah. I am also trying to convince my Colombian wife to move to Argentina. She prefers Chile.
Wassup with Columbian wife in 🇨🇦? No lady in snow?
And Trudeau still sending $$ to Ukraine while Russia parked in Cuba!
Northern hemisphere is so polluted, 90 percent of pollution is generated in the northern hemisphere, Chile is further south and is probably the best place to live, survive and thrive.
@NigelHyphenJones China cares tremendously about air pollution, if you look at the charts for places like Schengen and Guangzhou over the last 5-10 years the pollution levels have fallen drastically.
They just actually try to fix the problem and care about it rather than only doing stuff to pander to leftists and line their own pockets.
@NigelHyphenJones He's not talking about carbon, just pollution in general. All of the southern continents would be much safer in a nuclear war. No one is nuking the Amazon rainforest.
You missed something very important: access to your wealth. SWIFT ain't going to work if Western banks are all turned into radioactive glass. You need local wealth in your refuge country.
You need skills not wealth after a nuke attack, I can hum but not sing or dance, I won't last long !
Lol re access to “wealth”. It is all paper.
@@allangilbert5865😂😂 can you tap dance
I live in Newfoundland Canada a tiny Island in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.Would it be safe here?
some models predict massive ozone depletion, which would be a big problem in both New Zealand and Iceland. Also continental climates would be expected to drop 30C while maritime climates would expect to drop 8C. That's a big part of the food production issue.
If you're in a population centre then weapons are much more then 20-30x more powerful as Hiroshima, asthey use multiple warheads in a small area, EACH is 20-30x. The combined effect is greater than the sum of their parts so being in Washington on judgment day would be like 200x more much more.