Did O.J. Simpson CONFESS to EVERYTHING?! Body Language Analyst REACTS to :The Lost Confession."
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 кві 2024
- O.J. Simpson, the defendant in one of the most talked about trials in history opened up during an interview on FOX that was kept secret for over a decade. In the interview he told a "hypothetical" version of what would have happened if he had in fact been guilty. But what do his body language, facial expressions and word choice reveal and is this really just a hypothetical story? Find out now!
SEE ME LIVE ON STAGE on April 27th (Montreal)! Tickets here, LIMITED SEATS LEFT:
www.eventbrite.ca/e/spidey-me...
For Early access to all videos, including this one, become a member of The Behavioral Arts here:
/ @thebehavioralarts
Get "Liespotting" by Pamela Meyer and learn how to spot deception:
amzn.to/3UlYDy1
Check out my favorite books on how to read body language (affiliate links):
amzn.to/3TNNYdf
amzn.to/3Jmff3z
amzn.to/3QWbXYp
amzn.to/3orQNWF
Find me on:
TikTok: vm.tiktok.com/9X42QX/
Instagram: / spideyhypnosis
Facebook: / spideymagic
Full Interview here: • O. J. SIMPSON | THE ...
ARTICLES
variety.com/2024/film/obituar...
SOURCES
Eyebrow flashing across cultures
www.semanticscholar.org/paper...
Evolution of Eyebrow mobilitywww.upi.com/Science_News/2018...
The Science of Eyebrow Flashing
• Why Do We Raise Our Ey...
Eye Flutters and memory encoding
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
Expression of Angerwww.paulekman.com/universal-e...
Expression of Contemptwww.paulekman.com/universal-e...
TIMESTAMPS
04:07 O.J. Simpson Body Language
14:32 Does He REALLY Think This was OK?
23:14 Was This O.J.'s Confession?
38:00 Did He Slip Up?
40:24 Is O.J. Simpson Lying?
#behavioralpsychology #bodylanguage #howtoreadbodylanguage #psychology #thebehavioralarts #behavioralanalysis #howtoreadpeople #liedetection #OJ #ojsimpson - Розваги
“I remember” does not belong in a hypothetical
So true.
Im sure he would say he was "remembering" from the book but this is EVIDENCE he so did it
@@londonmarie6974 Right? I mean, you’re doing an interview about a book you wrote and you can’t remember what you wrote in the book?
I absolutely believe he is telling a recollection as a confession but he probably doesn't remember the book because he didn't write it he had a ghostwriter. I would think he is such a smug bastard he probably didn't even read it either. I wish this reporter would have really asked him more about when did you read the book and what was your favorite part of it and got him pinned down in some tricky questions.
Guy is dead enjoy yourself have a celebration..
He got caught up in reliving it and forgot it was supposed to be hypothtical
Totally agree.
Couldn’t agree more. And was laughing about being found not guilty!
Yes. The laughing is the worst part.
1000% he's guilty & reliving the entire facts. Imo
@@aprilwycherley Very, very creepy!!
Saying “I don’t recall” in a hypothetical is wild!!!
I was looking for this comment
Exactly.
Yep. I was stunned
Right! Like, it's hypothetical, make something up 🙄🤦🏻♀️
The Justice System failed miserably. RIP Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman
Mk ultra, he was part of the satanic club
I agree it probably failed here but look at all the innocent men in prison because of the corrupt justice system! One guy getting away with it is not the story, it's the thousands of innocent men that pay the price of corruption!
Well, where the justice system on earth failed, God’s justice has not. Sadly, he is probably not in a better place right now.
So many mistakes made during this trial. The jury were forced to let him free.
If you watch the documentary jurors hint at they acquitted him bc of Rodney king and other injustices.
The fact that he can openly discuss how he MIGHT have committed such a crime, even Hypothetically, is insane.
Absolutely Insane and shows what a real psycho he must have been 👍
Word!! Who creates a “hypothetical what IF I had done it” for a double murder at all. EVER. Especially after being acquitted. This guy confessed for real
No Shit ! Wow !
True. If it's hypothetical and you didn't actually do it, why does it even matter? Dude had such brain damage.
The mother of his children
I simply do not understand the intentions behind a so called "hypothetical" recount of the murders. Who gets accused of a horrible crime, claims they didn't do it but then writes a "hypothetical" admission? It doesn't make sense. It just doesn't.
It does make sense if the individual is proud of what they did. It’s scary actually.
A narcissist.
Maybe, if his testimony was that he lost his memory of that night, a hypothetical would be to explain the physical evidence, like how his glove was there. He would hypothesize what he would have done, how he would have acted based on his personality.
That's because narcissists DON'T make sense. They make you feel like you're the crazy one. And I'm speaking by experience with one.
Seriously. Not only that but has written the book about this and made tik toks about how he "hypothetically" did it. He's a narcissist. He got away with murder and now he gets off on it because he knows he can't be tried twice for the same crime. He enjoyed teasing the public about how they got it wrong. Its sick!
Him laughing after talking about the blood everywhere is terrifying 😢
Horrible!
I guess it was an annoying mess for him to clean off .
People sometimes laugh because they feel uncomfortable and it's their way of discharging stress.
@@cw9343 This did not look like that to me. It looked like a complete lack of feeling about the murders.
Yes even if you didn't do it I think he knew who did it or he was the driver or maybe his oldest son, but regardless, a smile or a giggle when thinking about the murder Slaughter of your ex-wife and the mother of your children is inappropriate people many people have a nervous giggle or a nervous laugh yes I agree but not really when talking about a total vicious murder
When people say something hypothetical, they usually say “I would have” and words like “probably” or “possibly”, but he says straight out “I did” and doesn’t look like he’s making it up, but in that he’s effortlessly recalling the actual incident. Absolutely mind-blowing 🤯
I think he’s so proud of himself he want to find a way to confess without confessing. He thinks it’s funny he got away with it. It’s sickening. There is no hypothetical.
I think he’s haunted by it and wants to confess to alleviate the guilt he feels.
100%! He WANTED to tell the world he did it, and he could, because he'd been acquitted. He is proud of himself. Disgusting excuse for a human being. No remorse, not tortured, in fact, he has no conscience. If he did, for the sake of his children, he would not have written the book or done the interview.
Agreed, he’s talking about it without outright admitting guilt.
@xmanc5687 no guilt expressed by him
He can't be put away for it now / then.
I wonder if that female interviewer ever really got the recognition she deserved for her masterful interviewing techniques that caused OJ to confess
Not OJ's type. Probably on purpose
for real , this is amazing killer confession . all i can said is wow respect to her ability to stay to closed to a real K
That’s Judith Regan. She’s a big deal and used to be on TV a lot a few years ago.
I’m pretty sure it was because he justified in his own mind that it was the book he was re telling
She was actually fired but then vindicated and brought back. I just read something she wrote about it today.
When Simpson says the guy gets into a karate thing & Simpson says, “So you think you can kick my ass?”, he’s not speaking hypothetically. He’s reliving the effrontery of this unknown guy thinking he can physically best the great OJ.
And then oj,grabbed the knife
@@davidvetere4120 or maybe there was never a "Charlie" - he had the knife the whole time...notice how he is vague about Nicole "falling". The autopsy revealed she had blunt force trauma to her head. I think OJ knocked her out with the butt end of the knife and then that's when Ron got into a defensive posture. He took care of Ron, and then came back to finish the job on Nicole. Claiming he doesn't remember or blacked out is a way of not taking responsibility for his actions.
@@louisg3598 that could be he was definitely recalling from the first person
And Ron Goldman really had a 3rd degree black belt in karate... Hypothetical??
@@joestefanoni5263No he didn’t, he never did karate. His sister Kim dispelled this rumor on her podcast.
What stands out for me is the smirk immediately after, "I don't recall."
And one doesn't "recall" a "hypothetical"!
He smirked because he was paid millions of dollars to tell you a story. He is now and forever dead by the way. Enjoy your life now😏😁😵🫡😇🙌
Narcissistic trait.
WHAT DID I JUST WATCH!!!??? This was not hypothetical. This was him telling us what he did. This was a flashback. I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE! WOW WOW WOW WOW!!!!!! He just confessed.
It's craaazy! 😮
The paid him millions of dollars to them a made up story, and he delivered. Now you can breathe he is dead yes..😵😁😏🤣🤡🤡🤡
Yep, like I keep saying...veiled confession. Totally.
Agreed. First time I’d seen it too, and it definitely is a slip into a flashback. There’s something about the person-age, if I was reading it there’s a distinct moment between going from 3rd person (‘he did’, ‘he felt’, ‘he thought’, ‘he saw’) to 1st. I can almost hear the narrator’s voice change.
@@jessicadangerfield1539 Lets dig him up from his grave and retrial him, since we now have this damming evidence 🤣😏😁😵💫😒😒🤣🤡🤡
That fact that he talks in first person for the whole “hypothetical” explanation gives me the creeps
Nonone would do that if it was mother of my kids how could you even do a hypothetical. He was having flash backs or something
Especially when he says I remember. You hypothetically remember? 😒 Makes no sense
He used a lot of distancing language in the beginningol of the interview.. and I'd have expected for him to use 3rd person to tell this hypothetical scenario yet he chose the most personal one.. (1st person) and actually took you there.. without using any keywords (hypothetical, supposedly, etc)
He the laughs at the expense of his murdered ex clearly shows he shows no empathy and couldn't care less about what happened to her..
Omg 😮 I didn't realized I replied to your comment. I wanted to comment to the general section.. the creepiest part is that you came to the same conclusion about the 1st person 😮😮😮
Dude was psychotic
You are spot on Spidey! This was his recall. These were NOT "hypotheticals", they were true recollections. The interviewer was genius the way she walked him down memory lane.
Guilty as sin and anybody who ever thought otherwise is laughable.
I think everybody thought otherwise but what could you do about it? He was already tried and acquitted.
@@MrCmitche11 I dont know what you are talking about.There are legions of people out there that think he,s innocent.
@@BarryLivermore if you asked a random 100 people like 99 are saying guilty.
@@MrCmitche11 Highly doubt that even amongst white people and blacks you could reverse that figure.
@@BarryLivermoreLegions of fools if you believe he was innocent. There is NOTHING about him or the way he behaved in the aftermath that points to anything other than guilt
I think he’s telling the truth ”real” story, not the “hypothetical“ story. He spends the first portion of the telling making sure everyone understands that it’s a hypothetical. But, as he continues the telling, he loses the “if” and the “in the hypothetical,” and starts speaking as someone who’s there, in the moment, and not speaking in the imaginary. He starts talking as though he’s giving actual testimony and not possibles. His change in the way he ends his verbal delivery as opposed to how he begins it is a dead giveaway that he is recalling an actual memory and not making a hypothetical statement.
Yeah totally agreed. Hypotheticals don’t usually look or sound like that
People don't usually physically act out hypotheticals. They may "talk with their hands" but they're not direct actions of the act itself.
And laughs about it
Because he is guilty, he is such a narcissist that he is dying to tell about the killing.
In the part where he says he doesn't recall... I get the impression that he's holding back... perhaps he does recall and he actually broke the gate.. whatever happened, it's not part of his rehearsed story, so he doesn't want to add it... covers with- I don't recall... This is something a lawyer would train him to say on the stand... if it's not an answer the lawyer has told him to give- he must say, "I don't recall." His hint of smile and very hard eye contact at this moment tell her, leave it alone that is his final answer.
at 24:11 he says "I remember thinking". Who remembers thinking during a hypothetical where he is supposed to just be retelling a story that's already been told in writing? This is a CONFESSION!
Yeah, that stuck out to me too. It’s just unnecessary in a hypothetical.
Why is it so hard for him to explain the hypothetical story if it’s hypothetical?
On Ron Goldman it was contempt for his competition. He was telling us that Ron Goldman was beneath him. He wasn’t really “anybody”. In other words Nicole is choosing someone lesser than OJ to hang with. It’s an ego thing.
He completely forgot he was supposed to speak hypothetically and spoke from memory. His language fit his body movements. He was a seriously scary person.
I dont think he forgot. He wanted us to know. It fed his arrogance.
During the car bashing up front I heard his talk about it being his as a way of saying, "I never bashed HER car, I bashed MY car and I can do anything I want with my possessions."
Bingo!
🎯
And she was one of those possessions. ?
FACTS!!!!!
Truth. But he didn’t even say he bashed the car, he said he gave it a little hit and reinacted the hit.
As a former cop with training in NLP and interrogation techniques, I can tell you he was recalling what he did that night. And let’s just be honest - he’s a classic sociopath with a narcissistic personality.
As an HR professional, I can agree with everything you have said. The first story with the baseball bat was rehearsed and a lot was left out and the hypothetical story to me is a true account of actual events that happened. What sane person would even consider writing a hypothetical about murdering someone that you have been accused of killing and then on top of that agreeing to an interview about it. The only person I can think of that would agree to do this is the actual guilty person who committed the crime, got away with it and now wants to gloat about how he did it and then got away with it. EGO!
He was completely telling us a story that he remembered.... He said multiple times" I remember grabbing the knife"." I remember Nicole fell."
" I remember Nicole said to get out. This is her house."
He was laughing inside thinking i there is nothing anybody can do to put me in jail even if i say i did it. He was enjoying the interview like a psychopath
The person that Lawyer for OJ is Robert Kardashian that keep me thinking is this for real it's crazy bout this whole are deal
No innocent person would go back to this tragedy and relive in 1st person a hypothetical situation where they were NOT innocent IN DETAIL. 🤨 I was also a kid during his car chase and remember thinking no way in hell an innocent person would do that. My car, my kids, everything is a possession, there’s a real lack of empathy or compassion here.
I thought the same thing in real time. Why would an innocent man flee AND say he was going to kill himself. Which, I even knew then, he wouldn't do it.
💯
Exactly
Yea I was 14. I said That’s a guilty man.
I was in my early 30's and I thought the same thing.
Funny enough, a few days ago I watched an episode of Monk (can't be friends with people who don't like Monk ❤) where they mentionned the "urge to confess" that all guilty people supposedly have. For now, this "urge to confess" theory is the only rational explanation I can find to why the hell an "innocent"(?) person would not just tell, but also write an hypothetical story about the very crime they're accused of.
Maybe OJ has a timed confession to be released when "Charley" or whom ever else was involved has died, as his reward to them of keeping quiet while OJ was alive,
Perhaps he thinks, just in case there is a hell, that i may get out when the truth is told?
Monk is never wrong. It's a gift, and a curse.
@@warmfuzzyfeeling A gift and a curse in this world cause... It's jungle out there.
I agree with you 100%. OJ was stating that he didn't recall if the gate was unlocked or not.
Yeah, out of nowhere, "Nichole fell." Right!!
You are right, he is using the straight past tense, not the "subjunctive tense" or whatever it is called. ("I did this" vs "I would have done that".)
"It was horrible. It was absolutely horrible." [Smirk]
It all depends on what was in the book. Remember, he wanted to ensure he was going to get paid.
the autopsy proved she had blunt force trauma to her head, about the size of the butt end of the knife. if that strike didn't knock her out, she hit her head on the wall which did. after he dealt with Ron he returned and finished her off. there's a youtube video with a close re-enactment of the scene. if you watch that and then watch him describe the scene in this video, it's eerily similar. he did it and he didn't have help.
15 years ago, My friend was murdered by her husband in a very similar way. I still can’t tell the story without tearing up.
He is talking about the mother of his children. How can he talk about this so nonchalant and without any emotion?
This is not hypothetical.
I’m so sorry. That is horrible. We lost Our childhood friend that way 12 years ago. I still cannot believe she is gone and it haunts Me. The terror she must have been in.
Her soon to be ex husband ended his life also. She was intelligent, athletic and fiercely independent. Often that is the type these horrible monsters target. They are jealous.
Indeed. The lack of grief is disturbing regardless of what really happened
A typical narcissist has no empathy for anyone! Nicole was just one of his possessions. If he can’t have her then nobody can is the motive for his murder.
Yes, he even laughed or chuckled 😵🤔😖 who chuckles about the murder of a loved one??
He has no remorse in fact he is laughing about it.. that guy was nuts any other person will burst in tears like his friends did when talking about nicole
Saying “I remember” repeatedly in his hypothetical doesn’t bode well. No part of his story, (especially the stabbing motions) felt like a hypothetical.
I know I caught that!! So creepy! I watched a video where he went to Nicole’s grave & was screaming at it! Ppl got scared & called the police! Can you imagine?! He probably wanted to dig her up & murder her again!
My thoughts exactly 💯
Every time he said I remember, I’m over here shaking my head. I remember might as well be “I confess.”
If it doesn't fit you must, Do you remember the rest?🤣😏😁🤡🤡😇😇🙌🙌😜
He's giving out specific details she had candles going she had music on. This is a complete confession nothing else
"it was horrible, horrible." Then, a half-smile!
That "hypothetical" was one of the most creepy things I ever saw.
The fact anyone would even go into so much detail about "hypothetically" killing the mother of your kids when its well known that he also stalked her and abused her is bizzare.
Not only is this a 100% true confession, but he seems to get a kick out of the fact that he knows that she knows it's not hypothetical. It excites him to be able to recall it with no fear of repercussion. Sick stuff.
No there was no Charlie. He also told his agent that Nicole came out of the house carrying a knife and used that.
Yep
He was a definite psychopath!!!
Nol bro. This is the actual story.
Great video
Hey Guys, not sure if anyone told you this but, Ojaye was proven innocent, he is now dead.. Hope this helps !🤣😏😁🤡🤡
Even if they had video evidence of him murdering, the jury will say not guilty 😡
Hey Spidey,
It's no wonder you're spidey sense was tingling!
When he started describing the murderer he went from the hypothetical to the first person tense.
I think because of the tense changing and the laugh at the end of his description, even though it was a nervous laugh, indicates that he has a sense of pride about what he did!
At 25:30, when he says "while I was there", from that point onward he allowed his mask to slip. He was no longer speaking hypothetically but rather went straight into full recollection and was just narrating the events as he remembered them happening. It wasn't until after he mentioned how much blood there was that he realized his error and LITERALLY stated that he needed to back up and clarify that he was speaking hypothetically the whole time.
This was 100% the confession of OJ Simpson.
Perfectly said
someone that was wrongly accused of murder and got off the hook would probably never wanna speak about that again, and not explore doing this gruesome act "hypothetically"
That’s a good point. It’s most likely that he would want to put that whole mess behind him
Except he's proud of it and wants everyone to know but can't say. Reminded of serial killers who taunt the police with their letters, etc.
They would talk about why it was impossible for them to have done it...NOT how they would have done it.
Exactly! But OJ was not done with trying to convince us he was not guilty.
@@delialara-correa4271 Lol, true! 😆
I feel like I just watched him search, find and relive each moment. All triggered by the interviewers clever strategic line of questioning. Like watching flashback re-enactments in an interview-based documentary.
MY kids, instead of OUR kids... Very glaring possessive behaviors. This was shocking to watch. Great job, as always, Spidey.
Don’t be shocked or surprised the man was a narcissist clearly and overt narcissist
Get over it Dudes is dead, you can now get past your child hood.
My kids, my car, I pay for everything, he was a controlling entitled monster and obviously abusive, aggressive, violent, and guilty.
@@Shayzare Exactly! He also made a great deal of money for the Browns. They were not the Dana Point types until OJ!
Women say that to the father of their kids daily
To OJ, Nicole was his possession. If it wasn’t that night it would have been another time that OJ would have done it. Ron was at the wrong place and he came upon a violent scene in progress. OJ still blamed Nicole for what happened to her and spoke negatively of her in this interview. He didn’t mention her situation with Marcus Allen, which OJ’s narcissistic abusive controlling self couldn’t handle. He went there that night to make her pay especially after she ignored him at the recital and didn’t invite him to dinner that night with the family.
He even justifies his ‘hypothetical’ murder with her irritating behavior prior to it. Even a decade later.
I heard him say in an interview once that he felt like HE was murdered. Trying to defend himself 😳
The car story in the beginning actually illustrates his conflated sense of ownership. He bought the car for her but it's still his. Because everything belongs to him anyway.
Im wondering if the police got it wrong that Ron came up on a crime in progress. OJ has lied about alot but this interview as pointed out by many seems like a recall. I feel like an argument between him and Ron wouldve been the only thing to get Nicole to come outside. She probably saw him as an innocent bystander and could've been trying to 'protect' him to some degree
@@anythingcanhappen290He knocked her out first, dealth with Ron and then went back to finish her off.
I firmly believe OJ is 100% Guilty. I've felt that way right from the beginning. His smirks and laughing makes me sick, and verifies to me that I'm correct in this thinking.
His Trail is such a slap in the face to Justice in this country. This is the most chilling thing I’ve ever seen. He sits there and in detail confesses to the murders of Nicole and Ron Goldman. I mean why would someone who didn’t do it say they were surprised to see blood everywhere. Especially when he says “I grabbed the knife” he just cuts out the part where he went insane and killed Ron and Nicole in cold blood. Usual when people laugh I laugh but my face was straight. He flat out killed her and Ron. He didn’t even try to pin it on someone else. I think deep down he wrote this book to relieve his feelings of guilt and to flaunt the fact that he’s free even though he shouldn’t be.
I think it is an actual recall. He lost himself in the moment and finally confessed on camera. The interviewer was doing a great job. Thanks for the video, Spidey
NO this is NOT hypothetical!! And listen to how he whispered the word murderer. He does NOT want to admit to being that, AND he REALLY doesn't want anyone seeing him as a murderer.
His image was EVERYTHING to him!! He cared about that above all us!
doesn't have to worry any more.... he is with Satan for eternity !
Yet he just literally described murdering someone. Disgusting. The jury really messed up here.
@@dekchi8781A juror admitted getting him off because of Rodney King.
Robert Kardashian was his lawyer at court
Spidey, you are the very, very BEST!!! This is one of your best videos. I say so because it highlight your analytical and insightful observations and expertise. Your integrity and professionalism and humanity is evident. Your humanity and humility shines every time. I learn from you deeply every time. You make analysis accessible and compelling. TY.
His ego would not allow him to NOT do this CONFESSION. He wanted to gloat, smirk & laugh. I’ve watched this at least 10 times & realize something new EVERYTIME.
My 2 cents - when he even included the lead up to the event with "two weeks" that a lot of "irritating" things happen, it not only sounds real, but it sounds premeditated to me. And last laugh at the end... is that the BIGGEST duper's delight we've ever seen? It 100% sounds like him recalling a truthful event and then laughing nervously because he got away with it. Tragic.
Yeah the 2 weeks thing is huge, it’s another example of reality being mixed into this “hypothetical.” Why would real emotions play into a hypothetical situation.
I soooo rarely call out duper’s delight. There’s no physical distinction between duper’s and any other type of smile and there are a million reasons we smile. For me to call something duper’s delight it has to be a scenario where smiling is very off baseline and it’s a very serious moment. He is constantly laughing throughout this interview, he does it when he’s nervous and he does it to lighten the mood and create rapport. Are some of the smiles or laughs DD? Maybe. It’s very possible but it’s so hard to call out DD with any amount of certainty in a case like this. 😊
I once read that OJ didn't have a very high IQ. He was just a handsome man with a lot of athletic ability who was also charming and a narcissist. It really comes through here.
Add getting hit in the head playing football couldn't have helped.
He seems smart, he just has no empathy which comes across as lacking the ability to understand how tone deaf he seems
Wanted to comment about the narcissism which seems apparent to me in this video- you said what I was thinking.
@@Sarah-with-an-H hmm, great insight, thanks for your contribution, well there are different kinds of smart, street smarts, book smart, etc, in order to be as popular and have a successful career after football in which he made commercials, he was a popular analyst and he was in movies he needed to have some ability to communicate and be charming which isn’t possible if you don’t have a modicum of intelligence but compared to a genius no he wasn’t smart but compared to the average person I think he could hold his own in conversation etc.
When he said,”And this is true……..”, my first thoughts was “Compared to what?”
I'm actually getting better on picking up things from watching/listening to Spidey. He's validating things in thinking before he breaks it down. Fascinating stuff!
Has to be one of the most injustice cases in American history. Just horrific & disturbing
And Casey Anthony !!!
And Emmett Till
as a watcher from the UK, i can tell you, i know absolutely nothing about this man, i havent heard much about his trial, i know other people had opinions, but i am that unbiased person you mentioned at the start. After watching this interview a couple of times. He absolutely did it.
The interviewer's body language is also quite telling and supports your analysis, Spidey....
She was grace under pressure - but watch her take a breath to suppress her disdain for his flippant recount of the baseball bat incident at 4:54 and while trying to retain her composure, it looks like an ever so slight jaw clench around 12:55.
She deserves a massive accolade for remaining so well composed during that interview!! 👌🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Right?! I saw that too after he described hitting the car with the baseball bat
Soledad O'Brien is an excellent interviewer.
I also recall that the interviewer was previously involved in an abusive relationship, so the strength she was showing was quite remarkable.
".....the day, The Juice had died. And Norm was singing bye bye Mr Murderer guy...."
So sad Norm wasn’t around to comment on this
@00:27:44 that was authentic recollection. He just literally confessed how the whole thing went down. I've got to watch the section a 3rd time because I can't believe my eyes and ears! WTF!
I remember watching this interview for the first time several years ago. It was so chilling when he got to the part where he was explaining what "hypothetically" happened, bc you could see that he lost himself in *actual recall* for just a moment. And I felt in my heart I was watching him *finally* tell what he did that night. So chilling. I'll never forget it.
just watching him talk is unnerving for some reason
The way in which Simpson laughs throughout his confession is bone chilling. simply put, and with no pun intended… He was dying to get this off his chest.
Yes, he wants to get it off his chest and be liked for it.
I thought the same thing. He wanted to tell the story, the way Most people do. But knew he didn't need to just "put it out there"...but So want to get it it off his chest at the same time. He got to do both.
This is NOT hypothetical.
I remember I was a Sophomore in high school when they read the verdict. When they said not guilty I wasn't surprised. Remember this was after the LA Riots a few years before and I feel they were worried about another uprising. But this interview is crazy. He switched so fast from hypothetical to "I remember" and other statements that show to me two things. One he was guilty, two he has no remorse
The "confession" part with the supposed hypothetical was so painfully similar to how my eldest brother Nathan would talk when he was weaving one of his *_MANY_* tall tales he'd spin in live time to whoever his audience was at the moment (he was a Sociopath). Especially when clearly uncomfortable, so in my brother's case, it was typically when he had to attempt to defend himself from things he did and said. Start sweating, their movement and positions begin to change more often, and their flow begins to kind of encounter hiccups, which often lead to rushed conclusions/escapes like "and... yeah so I don't remember after that" and the like. Love the "I don't remember" here because it's in the "hypothetical". LOL. Whoops.
To add to the whole thing, the one bit I could see with him reliving actually doing so matching his lack of memory, is Blind Rage. It's called Blind for a reason. You get completely consumed by the emotion to where you as a person quite literally cease to exist, and all that does is that rage. So people when in a blind rage genuinely do not have a clue what the fuck they are doing at all, nor will that typically have memory of what they said and did within it. And it is ridiculously tough to get someone to snap out of blind rage. You all but have to bludgeon them upside the head with something heavy, hard and blunt while yelling at them point blank as someone they're not attacking, and it needs to be someone they're close to to have any chance of working. My grandpa was a blind rage kind of guy, and my grandma had to do exactly that to him many times over the years to get him to snap out of it before he murdered someone. Ironically he was self-aware enough that he had one rule for anyone & everyone who ever set foot on their property - do NOT bring a weapon of any kind with you, because in his words "he WILL use it if someone angers him enough". So it is entirely possible he did have those blanks in his memory of the murders, but it still enforces that he in fact DID murder his ex-wife and her boyfriend and thus was reliving it.
He was not her boyfriend. He was a waiter who knew her because she goes to just restaurant a lot. He was returning sun glasses she’d left at the restaurant. I seem to remember that they reported back then that he was gay.
@@srae2007 I think I confused it for a Amber Alert that recently got called here in the Northwest haha.
That was chilling as hell props to the interviewer holding it together. That must have been so disturbing to experience face to face with the murdered confessing
Im pretty sure she feared Ojay just as much as you fear him now that he's dead.. Get over it 🤡🤡🤣😏😁
She says in the interview afterwards she was frozen in those expression you see there out of sheer disbelief
@@roddydykes7053 She prepared for that interview for years. She is a great actress. Breaking News!!! Ojay is Dead 😵 😵
I think, to answer your “why did he tell this story,” the answer is in his ongoing laughter. He is bragging about his crime and thinking we are aaaalll too dumb to see it. His ego has him believing he not only got away with murder but he can even tell about it, and not get in any trouble over it. He is just so very clever and it’s humorous to him.
Narcissists love to brag
Right? 😮😮😮
He is laughing at the preosecution because they botched the trial.
He is also laughing at everyone who is still asking what happened because it is obvious what happened and everyone should know what happened.
Does anyone remember the interview he did when he pretended to stab the presenter with a banana?
Reminds me of Trump and his brag story of being able to shoot someone and get away with it
Coincidentally OJ got arrested for that Vegas incident at the same time this book was being released.
I'm not an academic, but I was a professional salesman for many years. I was able to read people in much the same way you have analysed this interview and you are at last 95% correct. This was an actual confession! No doubt about it (in my opinion).
The way he shifts from hypothetical to straight up past tense at some points, the intense eyes, the inappropriate laughter and the simple fact the he is even telling a "hypothetical" of "if I did it" just makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up.
Before I saw the "if i did it" interview a few years ago I may have felt pretty certain that he was guilty, but this interview removed any doubt. It's just creepy to watch.
The demon came out to talk
What I can not understand is, if your ex wife was murdered and you did not do it, why would you EVER think about something hypothetical like "If I did do it, this is how I would have done it", then write about it, then do an interview about it. What?? Why??? Who would do that? Also, that smirk and head tilt at 25:15 just as he said he doesn't recall if the back gate was open or broken. That was suspicious to me. Such an interesting video Spidey, loved it!
I saw one video of him right after arrest when he initially declined the lie-detector test because, as he said, he had dreams of killing Nicole.
The psychopath Diane Downs did something similar. While being prosecuted, she came up with the idea herself and proceeded to tell people how she would’ve done it if she had. She had the same removed emotions as O.J. had, speaking about her deceased children with ZERO empathy or emotion, like they were mere props and nothings. No remorse shown. They were objects. It’s chilling.
An innocent person also wouldn’t go on a police chase. And would have not ignored the victims families.
37:07 because he truly believed he was justified in killing them. And he was only concerned that his reputation was killed. He said it bothered him that after all he had done in his life, all the accomplishments and accolades that it was so easy for people to believe that he was a brutal murderer.
This whole time, he was never sorry for his actions. He was only sorry that people turned on him so quickly. He said that it was like his character was murdered along with Ron and Nicole. Their murders murdered his character. Unreal the level of narcissism.
Love that you did this. When he passed, I thought it would be great if you would look back on him. So happy you did. ❤
Spidey, you are right. Starting with when interviewer said (the night of) "so the back gate, you go through the back gate", OJ was describing a "lived experience" not a hypothetical. His voice, demeanor changed, speaking cadence emphatic, he was taken back to that night, staring into the distance at times. It's the same look and demeanor that any victim or suspect go into when recalling a violent crime to law enforcement. He didn't keep repeating that it was a hypothetical from then on. He was also rationalizing his behavior throughout.
He said "I don't recall (regarding the gate)..." "I just remember Nicole fell..." "I remember I grabbed the knife, remember that portion, taking the knife from Charlie..." "And then I don't remember.." At that moment when the murders began, OJ said "remember" 4 times in under 16 seconds. He was clear in his actual recollection, he wasn't "telling a story."
And IMO, "Charlie" is what he called himself the night of murders. It was his way of disassociating himself from the act and memory. "I didn't take the knife (at Nicole's condo) but Charlie did." I watched the entire trial, there was zero evidence of a 2nd suspect at the crime scene. And there would been since it was a bloodbath. Ron was stabbed 20 times including his neck and Nicole was almost decapitated, there would of been evidence with a 4th set of footprints, etc. It was a crime of passion by someone in a rage who knew them, an overkill.
Since I watched the trial, this may give insight to some unanswered questions:
1. He did own a knife and kept it in his truck routinely thus readily had access to one.
2. Like he did in the past, OJ showed up uninvited and unannounced because he was actively stalking her at that time. Nicole, her boyfriends and friends either knew or saw OJ peeping into Nicole's condo window through the front patio next to the front locked gate several times before. He was obsessed with her, post divorce and jealous of all of her male friends in her life. It was motive to be there (not a stranger) and to murder both of them.
3. Although I wish the interviewer would clarified some things, we always wondered how events happened and in what order. OJ most certainly confirmed that he was already there stalking/peeping in on Nicole before she knew he was there, and before she came out of the condo. And before Ron walked up to the gate and pressed the bell to be let in.
He saw Ron, drew false conclusions about why Ron was there, they had a verbal confrontation which Nicole overheard as she left her condo to let Ron in the gate and attempted to make OJ leave. Keep in mind it was approximately 10 pm, dark in that tight area beyond the top of the stairs/patio with a high gate and a tree. Friends and family said Ron wouldn't of tried to leave to get help, he stayed to help his friend Nicole.
It wasn't other theories of that Nicole and Ron were talking first or Ron arrived with Nicole and OJ fighting so Ron tried to intercede.
4. This confirms the DA's Office theory that he was seeking to reconcile with Nicole, was upset that she had moved on from him with a new single life, she wasn't living the life he approved of and wouldn't listen to him anymore. She wouldn't take him back so this was his final act of control. He saw Nicole as his property and an extension of himself, not a human so he rationalized the murders as he was taking back what was his.
This is so tragic, so wrong and OJ never faced the consequences of these brutal murders. RIP Nicole and Ron.
Finally someone who has read along accurately with his story of what happened. Although as he’s telling the story, OJ says “Charlie” followed Ron there to make sure there was no problem. So I believe Ron showed up when OJ was already there, he was checking on Nicole’s “situation” before he left for Chicago. OJ, when talking about the lit candles he saw when he got there, started to say”it appeared” and changed it to, Nicole had a bunch of candles going to save on energy I think; and music was on, he says.
He does not want to appear as a jealous man!
I think every time OJ went over to peep in Nicole’s windows he wore a cap and gloves to blend in with the dark and no be too obvious ; and he was prepared with his knife for any trouble and according to what he told Ron Shipp; he had dreams of killing Nicole. Maybe that was his ultimate desire subconsciously.
I think he did perhaps black out the most gruesome part; because of his rage. I know that can happen, it happened to me before.
Thanks for putting forth what I believe is a very accurate telling of what happened that night; sounds like you too have listened to so many sides and viewpoints of everyone involved.
I think He uses Charlie so that he doesn’t have to be alone in the story.
Using the hypothetical because he has to set the story straight and it’s a confession; he knows he can’t be tried again and because he’s probably a psychopathic narcissist he doesn’t understand what it looks like from the outside perspective; there’s only his perspective.
Wow, incredible story!!!
Agreed… sociopath, psychopath, and narcissist all rolled into one. I wasn’t there that night Nicole and Ron were murdered, so with 99% certainty from day one of the freeway chase I knew in my heart of hearts he did it.
I agree that " Charlie" is just about the only element of this story that is a pure construct.
My husband had CTE. He heard voices. He didn't tell me that until 2 years before he died, and never said what they were saying. No excuses, but OJ could've been battling more than we know. And if more people knew about head trauma and the effects, although it was too late to save Nichole-- it could save someone else. OJ probably didn't understand OJ. You have a brain that lies to you, and you DO have episodes of blackout rage.
He wasn't stalking her at the time. He'd just been dumped by Paula, but spent time with Nicole at a dance recital for Sydney. The rejection from Paula probably made him run to Nicole-- and his ego couldn't handle another bruise.
Do you know like actually how he killed them?
One million % a confession! And what is so freaking creepy is that he wanted to even tell a “hypothetical” account of what happened. If I claimed to LOVE someone….the mother of my children being viciously murdered the LAST thing I want to imagine is what it would be like if “I” did it!! Like WTAF??? This is the scariest interview I’ve ever seen! And I watched the trial when it happened and can tell you exactly where I was when the verdict came in…and NOTHING in the trial came across as haunting as this interview.
OJ needed the money for the "hypothetical".
Ever notice how narcissists never realize how revealing their behaviors are?
I think he wanted to tell the story because somewhere inside he wants people to know that he had power over Nicole. He thinks he “won” in that situation and he wants people to know it.
Ya know what is interesting, the defense was all about the glove not fitting, but in this interview one thing struck me as odd, I had the knife under my seat, because I can t have a gun in LA, against the law, so I keep a knife, if you’re knowingly carrying a knife because a gun is against the law and your gonna get caught. I’m sure he would have know if he had the right size gloves would be the same. Maybe he purposefully had a smaller pair of gloves incase he needed an out! He made thought I just need the gloves to cover my finger prints. Premeditated murderer!
There was one point where I felt he was almost a threatening presence, and I reminded myself that others were in the room; it's ok, the interviewer is safe.
@@katrinat.3032 agreed!!
“Reading the riot act” is the exact same phrase he uses in the book as what he intended to do when he went to Nicole’s the night of the murder. He never expected Ron to show up & that set him off. The book sounds just like him. No doubt it was written based on his own words.
Also the phrase “…it’s got to stop!” as he says here.
The reason why I love your analysis compared to any other UA-cam channel based on physcho analysis, you're unbiased, you don't judge, you kind and you know a coin has two sides.
I'm the same too. I know, we all have our own stories cuz we're all individuals and different from eachother. We should always listen before judging.
Thanks a ton, sir! Please make a video on books recommendation.
Love and regards from India 🤍💐🙏🏽
No innocent person writes a book or gives an account of how he would have done the crime. So sad....
Very creepy… I have done hundreds of interviews with suspects and gotten a lot of confessions. I completely agree that OJ’s story sounded like a firsthand confession. He appeared to be reliving the experience rather than re-telling a fictional story.
Towards the end, he actually seemed as though he was looking for some kind of real sympathy from the interviewer due to the events that he “hypothetically“ went through. So bizarre.
Appeared to be? He was actually remembering and reliving the murders as he described what HE DID. Beyond ALL, not just reasonable doubt.
If you read the entire book nothing is hypothetical until he gets to the murders-then after that he doesn’t state when he’s out of the hypothetical state he just goes on to tell the rest of the story as if he’s innocent. Whoever wrote it didn’t do a good job. It came off as one big confession
I love how Spidey broke down this interview!! Awesomely done!!!
Excellent interviewer, he was definitely lost in conversation. I believe he was recalling the whole scene. Stabbed him, blacked out, 'woke up' to blood everywhere 😳
I don’t believe that he blacked out. I think he took pleasure in it but knew that didn’t align with his good-guy delusions. By saying he blacked out it ends questioning along those lines. It’s essentially saying “I can’t possibly know what happened in the intervening time as I was unconscious!” In OJ’s case, it’s literally a get out of jail free card.
A criminal returning to the scene of the crime. Wanting to share the actual event without consequences.
"I DO remember this part" is the most chilling line, because there is nothing more anyone needs to hear to know that he is telling the story of killing Ron and Nicole.
Edit: Thank God that monster is finally dead.
Hey Spidey, LOVE your stuff.
Entertaining, informative and enlightening.
Found you while I was trying to figure out the smith/rock debacle - compelling analysis, had me coming back for me.
Am currently obsessed with true crime from the interrogation perspective.
I'm located in Melbourne, Australia, so i can't get to your live shows but the tiny glimpses you sometimes give us look brilliant. Bc i can't attend IRL, any chance you can find a way to upload a recording? Or series of, if i dare be so greedy.😅
You're brilliant and entertaining, and I'd love to experience your non-BA not-so-serious stuff. You look like you have so much fun up on that stage!
YOUR GUT INSTINCTS ARE CORRECT MY MAN… 😔
HE. DID. IT. 😵💫
And he’s recalling it IN. REAL. TIME. 😭
Then laughing in the world’s face in an expression of relief..
This is one of the scariest interviews I’ve ever seen.
THANK YOU for giving your honest transparent opinion brother 😢♥️👍
Fading facts:"Things got heated." "Nicole fell...and hurt herself" " This guy got into a karate thing." People don't just topple over - she was either shoved or she tripped as she pulled away. No one springs into a karate stance unless they are compelled to defend themselves or others. Minimizes: "All kinda stuff around" meaning the blood of two victims of gruesome murder. I feel that OJ had a visceral need to confess to the murders - but I sense a BIG element of Duper's Delight, so did he experience any relief, or just another cynical spotlight moment for a person who craves his place on centre stage.
I agree with everything you said BUT " people don't just fall for no reason". I will for absolutely NI reason be standing talking to someone and out of Nowhere Get dizzy, blackout, legs go numb (to where I can't feel them at all) and I fall out on floor. So yes that can and does happen. Thank God I've never been seriously hurt. But I could of very well fell and hit my head and things could of been a lot different
@@LauraWells-uv1gn yeah but I would think that if you looked into that that you had a medical condition. And we never hear of Nicole spontaneously falling down. He shoved her or she tricks trying to get away.
Definite, feeding facts and multiple parts of this. And how about at the end where he’s like hey, I don’t want people to think I’m a… mumbling… a murderer. If you were not a murderer, you would say very clearly. I’m not a murderer.
You are 100% correct!
@@katrinat.3032I fully believe this is when he cracked her on top of her head with the butt of the knife. Just vile.
The verb tense is such a key observation!! That makes total sense and as a grammar nerd, I'm embarrassed that I didn't notice it! Hypotheticals literally REQUIRE the perfect tense, yet OJ does not use past perfect even ONCE while talking about the events. He just uses past tense as if stating facts. I'm blown away by this small but incredibly revealing detail.
Can you give the sentences showing what it was vs what it should of been
I don't know what
perfect tense neans
What's the difference between perfect past tense and and past tense?
I think an example is, Nicole would have, may have fallen vs Nicole fell.
@@hsmomofmany9022 thank you!
@hsmomofmany9022 Thank you! That's exactly what I was referring to. Past perfect uses the word "have", as in "would have/should have/etc..." to communicate ambiguity about whether something actually happened (or in the case of future perfect tense, might happen) but not that it necessarily did or will happen.
The fact that OJ demanded that this interview be conducted in strictly hypothetical terms yet never employs the past perfect tense indicates that he is recalling the events as he remembers them occurring. He's literally just narrating.
Hypothetically, if I was telling my opinion in a UA-cam comment, I might say something in a more neutral way than I would in talking to a friend. For example, I might say, “It certainly seems like OJ was reliving an experience.”
In reality what I have said many times is OJ murdered Ron and Nicole, had the stupidest jury alive who freed him, was proud of his murders, bragged about it in hidden ways, lived an evil life afterwards and didn’t die soon enough. He was having a grand old time telling that interviewer his most famous “rush.”
Hopefully, OJ will be wiped from record books and people’s memories and he’ll be soon forgotten, which was a fate he hoped to avoid. Evil man.
it is absolutely tragic for everyone. For Nicole, Ron Goldman, the children in particular, the families, the neighbours, friends and for OJ, a man who had so many gifts but was run by his human ego which is insane. Yes he was unable to execute a hypothetical because he was transported back to where he was no matter how he tried to interject - he was there and he was caught being there - undeniably so. How very very tragic for one and all.
Just the fact that Ron Goldman said I’m here to bring back Judy’s glasses, and OJ could barely comprehend that and just moved past that. That shows to me that he was enraged at the time.
Sorry, again - Who is Judy? A middle name for Nicole? 🤷♀️
@@judyjudy158 JUDY - NICOLES MOTHER
I wouldn't have believed Ron that he was just there to 'return glasses' but I would've just had a disagreement with Nicole and left like a normal person.
@@qtgonewild Thank you :)
@@MrMooremelodya normal person wouldn't be there, stalking his ex-wife
"This is difficult for me because it's hypothetical" = "This is difficult for me because I'm telling you exactly what I did."
Absolutely a confession.
People who do something terrible want to share and unburden themselves. This was his chance to do it under a guise of "telling a story," but he absolutely got caught up in reliving the moments. He sunk back into his memories of that time.
As a retired LEO & Fugitive warrants division supervisor, I can tell you that you're 100% not crazy. Your analysis of this entire interview/admission is completely spot on with every single thing that I saw. I can just about guarantee that this entire incident started the same way as what Simpson had done multiple times in the past, which was hiding in the dark outside of her home and watching her through the windows. This is also behavior that he admitted to doing on multiple occasions. But, this time he was either caught by Ms Simpson or Mr Goldman (I'm honestly not sure which one caught him and the other walked into the active altercation). His claim that he remembers "Nicole fell" is BS & I can just about guarantee that he threw her to the ground and "this guy kinda got into a karate thing, and I said, well, you think you can kick my ass" was Mr Goldmans automatic response to try to defend himself and Ms Simpson, either after watching him get physical with her or just accidentally stumbling upon some stalker hiding out in the bushes. This "interview" is 100% the confession of a hyper narcissistic murderer, IMHO. The only aspect that I can't decide on is if Charlie was an actual person who was there and helped to dispose of the bloody clothing, or if he is the only part of this story that is actual fiction. Feel free to contact me directly through my Google account if you'd like to discuss the matter further, as I respect your analysis in this video. Also, thanks for posting it.
Charley, aka, Jason, imo...he even has a scar, right?
Charley was an actual mob friend that he hung out with.
@deborahpowell5564 Yes, Charlie Ehrlich is who people assume he's referring to in this video and book. I'm just not sure if Charlie is 1. OJ's alter ego. 2. a fake name for his son Jason who has multiple psychological issues, a history of violence (including with knives), wore the same exact knit caps on a regular basis and had major known problems with Nicole. 3. Charlie Ehrlich 4. Someone else 5. No one at all and completely made up.
@ee-mon-ee1653 I think you may have your names confused. Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson were the victims at her house, and no one saw any OJ there. I'm assuming that you're talking about Brian "Kato" Kaelin being the one to try helping him get his bag to the limousine at OJ's house. On March 29, 1995, the prosecution did call Allan Park (limousine driver) and James Williams (airport skycap) for their testimony. Both testified that they saw Simpson with two separate bags near a trash can, but neither saw him actually throw the bags into the can. Park stated that Simpson had a total of 5 bags in the limo, and Williams stated that Simpson only had 3 bags at check-in. So, no one knows what definitely happened to the other two bags, but my guess would be said trash can.
Charlie is glen rogers the one in jail that said he murdered Nicole and Ron
I'm Spanish and I didn't know much about the case or the man. I am surprised and shaken.
My impression is a guy who is proud of what he has done and of getting away without punishment. It's like a kind of game, he talks about it with the excuse that it's hypothetical. At some point he seems like a child who is going to be scolded, but he recovers because, for himself, as always, he was and is right.
"Baby, I didn't cheat on you and I can prove it: here's a powerpoint presentation of how I would've done it, hypothetically."
🤣 excellent
@@TheBehavioralArts 😂🤭
When he was asked details about the hypothetical situation he responds “I don’t recall” ???? I thought this was hypothetical!!!! What does he need to recall??!
Exactly! 😵💫
Yes!❤
Exactly! Why didn't he make something up if it was hypothetical.
I have NEVER seen you react like this. It legitimately speaks volumes. You are normally extremely unbiased and neutral, sometimes to the point of causing me to argue with you through my screen because something seems so obvious and you are refusing to express your personal opinion. So to see you so openly befuddled is comical. Love it!!! No, you’re not crazy and yes it is so ridiculously obvious that he was recalling a memory. I don’t know why on earth he recorded that! Don’t write down your crimes! or record videos! Wtf?! That was probably one of the best videos I have ever seen in my life. I can say that I didn’t see ANY clusters of behavior that may indicate deception! Hahaha
It's the worst travesty of justice I've ever witnessed..
This was horrifyingly awesome. Both his admission and your analysis.
I listened to the entire OJ trial while restoring the old double hung, weighted windows in my house. I got a job shortly before the trial ended. I just remember going into a state of shock at the verdict. Those jurors KNEW he was guilty as much as I did, but decided to let him go free to stick it to the LAPD. I lost confidence in our judicial system then and it’s never been restored.
It was shocking to everyone. I agree that it shone a light on the flaws in our justice system. Flaws that have never been addressed let alone repaired, as we are seeing now.
It wasn’t the jurors fault it was the prosecutors who did a shitty job.
Same thing here - the entire group at work got together in the lunch room to hear the verdict. We were all so stunned that nobody said a word; we all just left the room in shock.
@@artphotognh I think there was alot of fishy business with the jurors-do any of you remember that? I think some were paid off during the trial!
I live in Australia and we weren't as invested in the trial, however, I remember seeing a recap of the verdict and after seeing the surprise and relief on O.J's face thinking 100%- 'That's a guilty man's relief.' Robert Kardashian knew he was guilty too. His face said it all.
Why on earth would anyone give a “hypothetical” account if something they emphatically deny happened?? A normal person wouldn’t do this….guilty or innocent?? A true narcissist!! He totally wants the story out there without accepting the consequences! He knows he can’t be tried again (with the same evidence) so he feels comfortable telling how it happened.
This is so bizarre!
He wanted the recognition because he was proud of what he had done, and hugely proud of having gotten away with it. Only a narcissist/psychopath can fully understand that state of mind.
I just have to say off point here that I love that little lamp over your right shoulder. It looks like it's floating. 😊. And thank you for your time and work on this video.
OJ called Goldman "A nobody" when he knew full well who he was...he tried to diminish him and make him sound lowly and insignificant. This description generally comes from loathing or feeling that you are better or above others. A jealous person would use this term.
the part that stuck out to me the most was: at 25:50 where she starts reading straight from the book, what is written that Ron Goldman says, and OJ says "yeah, words to that effect, yes" but it's not "words to that effect", she just read a straight quote from the hypothetical situation. Those are the exact words, but his response points to him not being entirely sure if that's exactly what Ron said in real life. It definitely seems like he shifts back and forth between relaying it hypothetically, and just straight up trying to remember what happened that night.
It's pretty mental. He must think everyone else is just so stupid that they'll never figure it out.
@@alukuhitoor that for some reason he just can't be taken to trial again
I caught that as well. Thought the exact same thing. That was a confession. Some researcher found Charlie the guy with the knife. There's more to that story. Look it up it's on UA-cam