US company makes historic Moon landing | BBC News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
- An American company has made history by becoming the first commercial outfit to put a spacecraft on the Moon.
Houston-based Intuitive Machines landed its Odysseus robot near the lunar south pole, more than 50 years on from the last Apollo mission in 1972.
It was an important moment, not just for the commercial exploitation of space, but for the US space programme in general.
Nasa had purchased room on Odysseus for six scientific instruments, and its administrator Bill Nelson was quick to add his congratulations to Intuitive Machines for a mission he described as a "triumph".
Subscribe here: bit.ly/1rbfUog
For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news
#US #MoonLanding #BBCNews
"It wasn't the United States taxpayer footing the bill."
The company was awarded a 118 million dollar grant from NASA.
The US government funds NASA.
Who does she think funds the US government?
$118M is a tiny fraction of the total project costs.
BBC fake news
NASA paid a private company $118 million to do a space mission. If NASA had done this mission itself with no private company, it would have cost the tax payer $500 million to $1 billion . If you had taken the time to do the research you would have found that, by NASA paying this private company $118 million they saved the tax payer between $382 million and $800 million, because government run companies and organizations are wasteful. Glad I could help 😂
@@_ArsNovapeople like you are the problem. It's only tiny fraction but there thousands of companies who are only taking a tiny of a fraction from the US government.
@@aboucard93 NASA spends more than $118m a year just on printer paper.
Good lord dude they really are making remakes of everything nowadays lol.
When new becomes old, old becomes new.
Their Odysseus Moon Lander already tipped over once it landed. They failed to tell people until the stock market closed and their shares went up.
Its fake, just like first time
@@lexxxsuperiorwhy
@@lexxxsuperiorStill realer than your wife's orgasms
ISRO was the first space agency to do a successful landing on Moon’s South Pole. Reporter forgot to mention that OFCOURSE!
Typical britisher
@@m.krishnanunnilindu nasa ki vja se hi sb hua h verna go mutra pene walo k baski kuch nhi bas ghamand bhara h
What are you expecting from these kinds of hypocritical news channels?
That was the fakest shit I ever saw lmao
@@sunnyztmoneysounds like you laughed your brains off too 😅
Anyone else think that was Shwarzenegger in the thumbnail 😂
I've played Kerbal Space Program and know first hand how difficult this is to achieve. Congrats Intuitive Machines.
💀💀
Nah ksp is easy
I associate things like belief in mainstream media propaganda with schizoid narcissism. It's part of scizo lore. To them it all makes perfect sense, but to me none of their insane ramblings make any sense.
its easy as heck to get to mun in ksp you just have a skill issue
Everybody that played ksp had their first mun Landing, it was not easy! After 10 years we do it blind folded... Awê
One small step for man, one giant leap for shareholders.
God bless them.
At least they invested in something that will benefit mankind
It may help corporations mining minerals but NOT a single help for mankind@@phelixphelix227
@@phelixphelix227how will it be for mankind? 😂 all the resources or money made will go to one small group you and me will see no benefit. I love how people stand up for the same ones making their lives worse on the off chance they might get to be like them one day and you just don't understand 😂😂
@@reaperdragon1 With technological progress life gets better for all of us.
Wow…so many graduates of UA-cam University calling this fake. SMH…
What a fake moon landing, how did they hire a camera man in space lol
Are you talking about the Apollo moon landings? @@Kopie0830
I'm not a flat earther i think if they are hiding something its much more likely they are hiding land in antartica, but the lack of actual space footage is alarming. Seriously most space videos are CGI. And the ones that arent alot do have fish eyes lenses .
@@Kopie0830Hello???
"I'm not a flat earther"
Uh-huh...Heard that one before.
"i think if they are hiding something its much more likely they are hiding land in antartica,"
Who is "they"?
"And the ones that arent alot do have fish eyes lenses ."
Because the earth is large and most photos/videos from low earth orbit can't fit the earth into the field of view with a normal lens.@@FireKingMadness
Now we just need a moon base.
Put your helmets on NASA 🚽
We should have had it for decades, but for some inexplicable reason NASA just "gave up" and never approached the moon again. Why? There has to be a more sinister motive for this complete and utter deflation of NASA's ambition and scope.
@@DeathshuckBecause there's nothing there. What are you gonna do on the moon that's actually useful?
I think we need to go to the moon first
@@DeathshuckThere's nothing there. China started hinting at working on a moonbase and now that's why the US cares again. Same reason as the original space race.
that one man clapping saved the news
@chrissmith7259
0 seconds ago
Didn't anyone who invested in the rocket company ask why this lander was top heavy.
I can confirm without a doubt that it was going to fall over. My litte kid who was waiting for my fairy liquid bottle said daddy that spaceship is going to fall over. I said that means the investors can be asked for more money to do more research, It means they have to invest more or they lose everything.
My little one said daddy you always talk about governance when investing in rocket science. I said that's why you are still waiting for the fairy liquid bottle to finish so your rocket ship is made properly. It's not rocket science! Fairy liquid will help you clean up.
Put your helmets on NASA 🚽😂
🤨
That nasa operation room looks like a meeting room of a small business. 😂
Flat earthers are like 'well the moons only 7 miles above us its not that hard' 🤣
3000 miles you monkey, in 1969 they have made live transmissions from the moon in 2024 they can't even show you a picture or a video are you serious?!?!? LOL you guys are funny... but good luck believing in deception and money laundering.
Flat earthers, what about the conspiracy theorists in the comments. Seems the IQ level have decreased significantly the last decade. They believe in lies and call facts lies.
More like: it's all CGI it's fake
Can probably build a dirt tower to there. Hopefully 7 miles isn't above build limit
Their physics are the same. It would be as hard to get to the 7mile away moon than the 239,000miles moon.
I follow space news pretty well. How has this not been covered by the news more heavily? Where is the live feeds? Where was all the pre-launch coverage?
Because the news knows the people aren’t buying it anymore!
Hehe, now go and watch Indian moon landing lol
@@ultrmnml1219 Are you Lol-ing at your own bad joke? Essh.
@@MersageSW no
Landing in the studio part 2 ????
Proof?
@@SolarChronicle there's no live footage. there's you proof mate
You think a video is required in order to prove everything that happens in life? LOL! You’d make a sh!tty lawyer. @@zil0484
Hollywood studio😂😂
@@zil0484 why is it so hard to believe we have landed on the moon? were talking about the same species here right? we split the atom made hypersonic missiles, space x starship and a perfectly free education system which i recomend fully.
Anyone else feel like their clapping celebration in their control room felt sad.
There ancient structures on the moon they can’t talk about. It’s too taboo as confirmed in a nasa document before their Apollo mission to make it public. Idk about it being as taboo now.
@@niftyskates85 I want what you're smoking
@@niftyskates85 Ancient pyramids, space lasers, reptilians, nanobot CCP virus factories?
Lol😂😂😂😅😅
@@niftyskates85i’m sorry what
Wait for it: film at eleven. The spacecraft ejected a camera to the lunar surface to film the landing. Hopefully, we will see actual footage of the landing soon.
Of course you won't. Didn't you year what they said? The signal is too faint to transmit a picture from the surface of the moon. Believe, obey, never question the science.
@@aseelanzabut they got voyager spacecraft out in the middle of nowhere transmitting? Something doesn’t smell right here, smells like bullsh*t
@@anonymoususer19 the Apollo 11 mission was transmitted live from the moon in 1969. So yes, it has always been a bullshit story.
Yeah just wait, video producers creating and editing the video. ooops i meant is slowly transmitting back to earth, yes through space.... it takes time you get it? Just wait
ffs xD you think if they were going to fake something like this they'd have planned and made the videos first why would they make them during the 'act' and limit themselves to a few hour window? lol@@pablocamacho6830
Maybe when they try again in 50 years, someone will remember to stick a video camara on the outside of it, NASA should be able to afford a Go Pro.
We should be able to view the live footage in 4k by now. Unless the previous moon landing was a fake
@@zil0484
Shhhh! Don’t let the sheeple suspect anything!
Three things much of the public misses about this mission: The significance of the fact this mission was largely achieved by a private company; the extreme difficulty getting there; and the short time it took to transit to the location and actually land intact and operating. Well done, Odysseus team!
yet not a single person on earth saw the launch with their own eyes and you're not intelligent enough to know they're duping you?
@chrissmith7259
0 seconds ago
Didn't anyone who invested in the rocket company ask why this lander was top heavy.
I can confirm without a doubt that it was going to fall over. My litte kid who was waiting for my fairy liquid bottle said daddy that spaceship is going to fall over. I said that means the investors can be asked for more money to do more research, It means they have to invest more or they lose everything.
My little one said daddy you always talk about governance when investing in rocket science. I said that's why you are still waiting for the fairy liquid bottle to finish so your rocket ship is made properly. It's not rocket science! Fairy liquid will help you clean up.
Put your helmets on NASA 🚽
@chrissmith7259 Huh?? I would love to see you assist in the design process of an actual space ship. I'm sure you won't be as confident then, Because there you might learn that a 'Top heavy' space ship doesn't solely cause it to fall over. These scientists are the smartest out there and you think they wouldn't be able to account for some weight?
and the tax dodged
Pics would be nice.
Yes they have pictures of ASTRONUTS helmets 🚽👻😂
CGI only sorry 😂
How dare you ask about pictures? CANCEL THIS HEATHEN !!!!
absolutley no footage whatsoever of this thing landing. 1972 had people on it......what a load of bollo
Second that. It's bull.
Sora bra
What are you getting at?
@angeldelgado7120 sounds like he's getting at the fact that there's nothing to get at. You can take that comment as a literal truth based in fact. There is no footage of that thing "landing on the moon"
Don't be jealous😂
And no actual footage of any of this.... hmm 🤔
should we be uaing those cameras we have setup on the moon ?
Yeah we are all waiting for you to set up the WiFi signal on moon for us so we can see what’s really going on there 😂
@@jiazhechen they have setup the wifi signal already in the 70s
In the year 2024... 🤔... Hmmm
Because the images haven't yet arrived. The news lady just said it in the video. 2:48
Makes us more proud of ISRO Indian space research! ❤
No humans on board ? After 50 years?
Did it even happen with neil Armstrong
That’s because they lie over the years that they actual be on the moon….
Fake it until u make it
Certainly not very scientific, I mean, science of all things is that one that never goes backwards.
Well they did it 50 years a go lol
Please show Moon landing footage, no animation alright!
Accidently deleted 😁😁
They can't because they faking it
istg bruh
Total lie… again
The footage should be completely downloaded by today, it takes a moment given that it took them minutes to just confirm landing.
Well, if you do a giant leap forward and have one foot stuck, you tip over.
Why isnt anyone talking about ISRO landing there first.
They said many agencies and nations failed to do but not saying anything about India landed there first before any of them in the world.😂
Yaa man they are just keeping the wind to themselves only😂
BBC should be banned.
Can’t wait to see how this improves all our daily lives
Man can you imagine how excited they are going to get when they find out about Apollo 11.
Nobody will be going to that location anyway. NASA will make sure about that. In 200 years, it will not matter anymore.
What happened?
I was thinking the same thing. 👍😂
@@generico896 As stupid as Biden and Bush can be, they never wore sandals. But they were considered gods in the West! At least they have the power to screw up this world!
@chrissmith7259
0 seconds ago
Didn't anyone who invested in the rocket company ask why this lander was top heavy.
I can confirm without a doubt that it was going to fall over. My litte kid who was waiting for my fairy liquid bottle said daddy that spaceship is going to fall over. I said that means the investors can be asked for more money to do more research, It means they have to invest more or they lose everything.
My little one said daddy you always talk about governance when investing in rocket science. I said that's why you are still waiting for the fairy liquid bottle to finish so your rocket ship is made properly. It's not rocket science! Fairy liquid will help you clean up.
i bet in 50 years time they will do a “retro special” like they do now for all the 1970’s documentaries the BBC made, but on a video like this, and we will look back at how far we have come
Congratulations to everyone who worked hard for this.
We're is the footage?
Well, just like the whole "mission"...doesn`t exist xD
404 not found
@@user-fx9xr5yy6u loser talk
still in the studio for the final edits
@@arnoldronald3044 lol
New landing site so that no one will ask where are the equipment that we left there during the previous mission.
The Dunning-Kreuger Curve shows us that the people who actually know the least about a subject are the same people who often think & assert that they know more than everybody else. Here, you are that example!
No footage😂
If we've already been this is a huge leap backwards right
It's actually groundbreaking, if you don't think about it at all...... Ever
Why historic?! I have been here in the Moon for 10 years now waiting for someone to come and get me.
How’s the Wi-Fi up there?
@@GavinScrimgeour As you can see pretty well...
@@GavinScrimgeourNo Wi-Fi. Everything is planted to my brain.
Maybe it’s a rescue mission, and it’s historic because they didn’t know they could finally save you 🤣
@@Tanya.Pillay Well, I am pretty thirsty. No liquor up here.
😂😂😂😂😂first time??? When is someone actually land there and not in a film set in a hanger
Cant wait to see the pictures.
Where's the picture?
Why do you want a picture? You don't trust in science?
Sora is rendering
You saw where that got us@@aseelanza
@@meowrbius
😢
@SmilingMastiff-df5vn cancel this heretic!!!
Congratulations on doing what was already done in the 1960's.
You know they faked it in the 1960s
“Touched down” … non engineer might call that a crash when it flipped over and lost comms.
man we should have Moon Hotels by now, we are just repeating the same things we did 50 years ago
and you're probably repeating the same things you did 5 years ago..
@@adamblackedition5529 yes probably I do catch myself doing that! hahahahah, wait are you an empathic GET OUT OF MY BRAIN WEIRDO!
@@blakespower😂😂😂
Wtf 😂@@blakespower
They keep repeating the same lie, for the new generation
if there are no images there is no landing wtf😂😂😂 smh
Actual footage?
Well done guys 👏🏾
Was it the same camera man already on the moon who took the Neil Armstrong first steps
Who was covering the space craft landing on the moon? The cameraman did great.
I've been saying the same thing and people told me the camera was controlled from an earth station. Yeah o.k🤔
@@crimedeezy how is that difficult for you to understand, also been plenty of studies showing morons that the earth like all planets is a sphere and we did actually in fact go to the moon, ffs they could show off a live feed and you still would not believe it... silly.
@@alastairwallace6153 dude the camera followed them around and zoomed in and out with no delay. This is 50 years ago before C.D players or even VCRs
That's a simulation, Einstein.
@@crimedeezybut that was shot at Nevada Desert with a realistic set design & Stanley Kubrick's marvelous direction.. 🐸👽
Why doesn't NASA put an orbiting high quality camera in outer space to capture these events? Or onsite Camera in the moon? There are so many high res cameras nowadays that can capture the details of the moon. Why don't they use these tech to satellites?
Some might say that this is the first time the U.S. has actually been to the moon.
These are the voyages of the private enterprise. Its continuing mission: to make money for shareholders.
You're hating on such an accomplishment. Because someone's getting paid???
@bronxishomenomatterwhereig3149 privatizing space to private corporations isnt a good thing. They'll always put profit above all else.
@@chrisdaniels6174 You could apply that logic to anything. Should Air travel have been restricted to government control? Should car manufacturing have been restricted to government control? What about food? That's pretty important. Guess no one should dare make money off it and instead the government should control food supply.
@bronxishomenomatterwhereig3149 yes! 😂 why do you think your flights are so bad? Doors blowing off mid flight. The food at the grocery is banned in most other countries because it contains poison. And the cars are actually destroying the environment for everyone. Shit pick a product and show me where money over all else has created a better product 😂😂 don't worry I'll wait
Buy shares, sit back and get rich...but wait, there are risks involved..not as easy as it sounds
God bless America 🇺🇸
Are they streaming live from the moon?
1:01 I love how the table is shaped like Jupiter 😂😂😂
Congratulations to USA 🇺🇸 🎉
Love from India 🇮🇳 ❤️
How war ist the IM lander away from India`s Chandrayaan-3 landing site and do you have any Chandrayaan-footage to show.
You realize that all you saw here was 'Simulation'. You did not see ONE second of real footage. Are you OK with that or do you find that not ... curious?
India😂
@@noctis0524 tera baap us raat hila ke so jata toh tu aaisi harkate na krta??embarrassment
@@Solaire_Of-Astora Can you point me to real Chandrayaan-3 footage? Show me what you got!
@@kaptainkrampus2856bruh I'm not gonna argue. The entire landing footage as well as the footage of the rover rolling out is available on yt. Just search, "Chandrayaan 3 landing footage"
And still no real photos mmm . Fake
While I can't vouch for this moon landing personally, satellite spotting is a hobby of mine and is pretty widespread. I'm able to see and track a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be in the sky, to within a couple of seconds at most. I've gotten images of larger, lower orbiting satellites from the ground via my small (70 mm refractor) telescope - they look as claimed. With the help of a family member who lives about 150 km away I've measured the altitude and groundspeed of these things using triangulation - the same method, based on high-school trig , that surveyors use to measure the heights of mountains (height and ground speed always come in at hundreds of km and 5+ km a sec respectively). It's a method that can be truth tested on things like aircraft at cruise altitude, balloons or, well, mountaintops.
Getting a bit more technical: I follow the radio signals they produce with a UHF set and a directional antenna, and I'm able to track them to a source in the sky, and follow that source as it moves across the sky.
To do all of the above needs less than £150 in equipment - though some more skilled astrophotographers (e.g. like Thierry Legault), who have invested in good equipment, can get impressive levels of detail. But to simply find these things in the early evening sky, and get a measurement of their height and speed, needs no equipment - just a buddy 50km or more away, some high school trig, and a bit of practice measuring angles to the horizon with your hand and finger widths. Please, by all means, don't take my word: Go out a couple of hours after sunset, give your eyes 20 min to dark adapt, and check yourselves folks - there are a bunch of websites that will give you predictions for when known satellites will pass over your location, such as 'in-the-sky' or 'heavensabove' . You usually just need to put the nearest town in, but if you know your latitude and longitude they can be more precise). The more the merrier in this hobby.
Yet again, no genuine footage?
It has been disclosed that the lander crashed and tipped over on its side when landing
@@s._3560They will tell you ANYTHING! Its all lies!
Thanx' to Stanley Kubrick for ensuring the moon landing experience by the US in 1969 that created history... 🐸👽🤡
India already did that a few months ago & was the very first country to achieve a successful landing on the moon's southern pole !
That's Indian government own, the whole thing was paid for by Indian tax money. This is different because its private citizen own by his own money not from tax payers. Has an ordinary Indian person sent anything into outer space?
@@PrimalRage-om8uz Yeah i know that & i knew this was coming lol
Lost of help like guidance, equipments & tech related was provided by NASA & other US government departments for this, so you can’t juss say it was achieved completely by a private space agency single handedly on it’s own ! lol
@@abhinavingnope all systems of the lander of the lander were built by a private company including all the necessary systems like propulsion, landing, guidance etc. if you read the CLIpS contracts you’ll see that the only thing nasa provides is contracts for NaSA experiments on the lander. Also India was not the first one to put a lander autonomously on the lunar surface and nor was it competing with the Odysseus as the cryogenic engine landing is a very different tech than what India attempted.
@portcybertryx222 Only if you knew how to read properly, I never said about India being the first one to land on Lunar surface but it was for South Pole of the moon only.
And second, you're wrong about the systems too, those systems were also developed with the help of NASA as well, they work deep within together on such space stuff. There is a lot NASA does behind closed doors which never comes out in the public domain & they are always involved deeply in anything that happens in US space agencies to help them achieve success in one way or another.
Also, NASA did provide them equipments for sure, i read it somewhere a while ago, Also, as one other comment on this video's thread mentioned "The company was awarded a 118 million dollar grant from NASA.
The US government funds NASA."
So let's now include monetary help too from NASA ! LOL
Now the best part, compare it with the cost of India's space mission & how much it cost this private space agency ! LMAO
@@abhinavingI’m sorry who paid for it? The U.S sent India 181 million this year alone, and has another 130 million pledge.
Congratulations to successful landing.....
WELL DONE!!!
🇺🇸
ZERO EVIDENCE! in 1969 to 74 there was live streaming from the moon and to the moon.. you people are so gullible..
My grandma launched from Earth on her bicycle at the same time they did, and she is still waiting on the moon for them to land. They must’ve stoped at a gas station to grab a cheeseburger or something.
Bravo 👏🏻👏🏻 that’s some groundbreaking cgi right there
🤣🤣🤣I'm dying guys, this is ridiculous
While I can't vouch for this moon landing personally, satellite spotting is a hobby of mine and is pretty widespread. I'm able to see and track a few every clear night, where they're predicted to be in the sky, to within a couple of seconds at most. I've gotten images of larger, lower orbiting satellites from the ground via my small (70 mm refractor) telescope - they look as claimed. With the help of a family member who lives about 150 km away I've measured the altitude and groundspeed of these things using triangulation - the same method, based on high-school trig , that surveyors use to measure the heights of mountains (height and ground speed always come in at hundreds of km and 5+ km a sec respectively). It's a method that can be truth tested on things like aircraft at cruise altitude, balloons or, well, mountaintops.
Getting a bit more technical: I follow the radio signals they produce with a UHF set and a directional antenna, and I'm able to track them to a source in the sky, and follow that source as it moves across the sky.
To do all of the above needs less than £150 in equipment - though some more skilled astrophotographers (e.g. like Thierry Legault), who have invested in good equipment, can get impressive levels of detail. But to simply find these things in the early evening sky, and get a measurement of their height and speed, needs no equipment - just a buddy 50km or more away, some high school trig, and a bit of practice measuring angles to the horizon with your hand and finger widths. Please, by all means, don't take my word: Go out a couple of hours after sunset, give your eyes 20 min to dark adapt, and check yourselves folks - there are a bunch of websites that will give you predictions for when known satellites will pass over your location, such as 'in-the-sky' or 'heavensabove' . You usually just need to put the nearest town in, but if you know your latitude and longitude they can be more precise). The more the merrier in this hobby.
Are you familiar with bruce sees all channel?
@@byronsmith1982 No, but I'll be blunt: I'm not going to take the click-hungry photoshop fakery of some flat-earther youtuber over what I've been seeing and measuring in the offline, outdoors, real world sky for the last 30 years or so. Evidence is (absolutely _has_ to be) independent re-test and repetition of observations for yourself, not digital video - especially in this era of universal photoshop and video editor.
@@studentjohn the man aint no flat earther just shows the moon with a 14inch telescope
@@byronsmith1982 Sorry for pre-judging - i just get a lot of responses from people saying stuff like 'planets aren't real, they're just glowing clouds in the sky. look at this youtuber'.... and it turns out the youtuber just left the camera unfocussed, or didn't understand how the autofocus on a digital camera works, and thought their super-blurry images proved all astronomers everywhere wrong.
May the US continue to lead humanity into space and beyond
It was actually India that lead this phase of lunar exploration.
@@Onequietvoice Not really, sure they were the first to launch recently, but NASA already started planning the Artemis mission way before that, and plus the Indian lander crashed on the lunar surface. Lets also not forget who first planted their flag on the moon over 60 years ago : )
@@Bonk_RNare you sure that India's lander "crashed"? 😂
@@OnequietvoiceYou people are so annoying.
@@Bonk_RNA liar planted a flag in Nevada desert.
Was this one done in a studio as well or modern day cgi?
Seems it's cgi this time
That's how far mankind is going.
It's been 50 years, and as most know, the technology we have on our phones is at least 10 times the computing power of Apollo 17.
They really expect us to believe they're looking for ice as an energy source.
Hydrogen fuel cells are the future.
Whens the livestream?? I remember that last live stream with neil and buzz.. still no idea who set up and operated the camera though 😂
Apollo 17 was the last livestream, not Apollo 11.
Nobody set up and operated the camera. The live TV camera was stowed in an external compartment that hinged open to reveal the camera. It was already pre-aimed at the ladder.
It seems odd to me that if we have a rover and a helicopter all the way out on Mars, why would doing the same thing on the moon be all that big a deal? Yeah, I get the private company part of it is supposed to mean something, but it still seems NASA did the bulk of the work.
Especially if a "human"has once landed on the moon.
I'm just guessing here but the fact the moon has much much lower gravity and no atmosphere at all(so more interference from cosmic ray) its harder to predict how technology that works in 1g will work in the moons g, plus the price of the first moon landing was thousands times more costly
@@littlechineseladyv2517Chandrayan 3
Ask the ancient alien theorists. 😂
I thought that was Arnold in the thumbnail
the fact that the first man on the moon had camera to broadcast it and this doesnt is actually crazy
Yeah Stanley Kubrick put your helmets on NASA 🚽 😂
Look even Arnold Schwartzñagga is ready there to travel through tome for Terminator some say he actually travelled back in time for the movie which is how America found the Elixa of life yet havent realised it. He actually travelled through time and appeared in the time as he is now or when its found out how he showed up in set older than he was just as a younger human being
Wheres the video, its 2024, they should at least have some video of the landing showing the moon, etc..
Landing on the south pole so they don't have to show the lack of landers from "previous missions" 😂
huh?
The Dunning-Kreuger Curve shows us that the people who actually know the least about a subject are the same people who often think & assert that they know more than everybody else. Here, you are that example!
@@Jordan-rb28 it sounds like you just learned about the Dunning-Kreuger Curve and felt the need to show it off in your comment. I never claimed to know more than anyone else. People have had the suspicion that the U.S. never landed on the moon. Fact or fiction, I was just having some fun. Guess we can't have nice things with individuals such as yourself.
@@LilBaritone17 “People have had the suspicion that the U.S. never landed on the moon.”
Proof humans have walked on the Moon:
1. There are over 8,000 photosu available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked.
2. There are thousands of hours of video too.
3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon.
4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth.
5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions.
6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base.
7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base.
8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits.
9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon.
10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco
11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that.
12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing.
13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud.
14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports).
15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government.
16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm
17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks.
18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon.
19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon.
20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile.
21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic).
22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit.
23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
What a leap , yet 50 years ago they were playing golf up there , I wouldn’t believe a word of it .
Sadly the mission will only last 7 days. Lunar sunset over the region will bring such extreme cold temperatures, it will severely damage the lander. (Building a lander to survive this would be prohibitively expensive.)
they had the technology 50 years ago.. dah!
@@ig00g1e They had the technology to do it with a blank check 50 years ago. Important distinction.
I like how I’m finding this out from a British new company. Honestly I like your news better then here in America 😂
I was on the moon last night, didn't see that spacecraft there.
Great video thanks for sharing 🍻👍
that table at the center will make flat earthers go berserk.
If you were told this was a clip from a science fiction space motion picture no one on the planet earth would find this hard at all to believe.
Where are the real videos at? All these pics look like the pictures from elementary astronomy.
I was looking for some outstanding footage from this historic flight . So disappointed!
Thanks a lot
Achievement unlocked: Reach the 60's.
Was "Odie" being controlled from and guided from base or were coordinates entered in before takeoff?
A better drive than where we have been going. A different challenge coin.
Yay! I'm stoked! I remember the first time a man walked on the moon and I've been waiting for far too long for us to return.
Me too. It's cool that it's so far away
Don't cheer too soon. It fell over after landing. Strange how they do not mention this...
Never happened
@@timspikerit’s not like you could’ve created anything close to as impressive as this so don’t undermine it.
@@Jason-eu5zx I built these things in Kerbal Space Program and I made sure to give it self correction. So you were saying?
They forgot to add cameras or something?
I know the manned missions are still to come but can you imagine what It would be like to walk on another planet/moon?
"Drinkable drinking water."
As opposed to....?
Space might be the Final Frontier but it's filmed in a Hollywood Basement.
You flat earther? Good luck
Red Hot Chili Peppers 🌶️ ❤
The Dunning-Kreuger Curve shows us that the people who actually know the least about a subject are the same people who often think & assert that they know more than everybody else. Here, you are that example!
What leap forward for humanity? This feeds not one hungry child.
On top of that it might not even be true that we landed 50 years ago, or today.
Bravo!!!!!!!!
Where's the video feed? Why can't we see the real moon?
That lander didn't deploy the camera when landing.
Thanks
So i have question how much time to go from earth to moon ?
no video once again
When did this happen? World wants to know ? 🗿
...So where is the landing footage?
its fake
Lander forgot to deploy camera while landing 😂
Congratulations 👍👏👏
Reporter nothing but a faint signal
Mission control: we can confirm withoutva doubt that we are on the surface of the moon.
extract that "Water for Fueling" did any one catch that why sudden this running for moon missions around the world ?
The lander has kept over sideways, don't know how much of a success it is..!