#3 - I am taken aback by the suggestion that we didn't have the technology to analyse for water in (moon) rocks 50 years ago. I did just that for the Ontario Geological Survey Laboratories in my youth.
@@happychappy492 They are not "lying". But they are bending the truth in order to make the discovery of small amounts of water appear more ground-breaking than it really was.
@@happychappy492 That doesn't mean they're lying because you don't do anything to confirm it. Since you're not confirming it, you're not in a position to know if someone is lying. If you don't have an argument, confirming that someone is lying, then that someone is not lying. He is simply saying.
Thankyou PBS. We hear far too little inspiring and exciting ventures of Humankind. This one definitely has put a smile on my face, and a surging spirit in my heart. Cheers
Hey PBS, can you please include the original airdate in the description? Things are rapidly changing in space exploration so it’s important for people to know if this is up-to-date information. According to Wikipedia this was aired on July 10th 2019, 3 years before Artemis I successfully launched and completed, and before the Dear Moon crew announcement.
It also aired a good 10 months before SpaceX sent the very first crew to the ISS aboard Crew Dragon Demo 2. And in addition to that demonstration flight, there have now been 6 crews flown to and from the ISS.
A moon base is possible, but even an asteroid the size of a marble can completely obliterate a base about the size of two shipping containers. It would hit with the force of about 3 pounds of dynamite and at 162 000 mph will always penetrate any thickness of wall, of any substance.
@@elitiller8623 smal chance it would destroy the moon base.. we have the possibility of tsunamis, tornados, wars.. volcanos, asteroids, on earth and we don't die on mass constantly
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 Anything smaller than 50m never makes it through the atmosphere with enough left to do anything but shatter some windows. The chance of anything over city-killer, is once every million years. Basically, we don't build a house in the forest as it burns.
Well the first cleanup mission is to retrieve the diapers the first missions to the moon left behind. They've become a historic artefact proving the Americans did go to the Moon... The diapers could prove how if possible bacteria and germs survive in space - space being deprived of oxygen and water in general but in return have a lot of radiation could prove to be an important clue to the possibility of the theory of the Earth could have been seeded with life being struck by meteorites. I think it was Buzz Aldrin making jokes about the diapers could be having an impact on the future - aliens investigating the diapers to determine how the physiology of the humans worked...
Well done again Nova and PBS. a wonderfully informative inspiring show. Thank you. Space is indeed for now at least the final frontier for humanity. We are a curious species, its only natural for us to strive to be a a multi planet species... imagine. what awaits us ...see you out there...
What really 🤔 bothers me about the craters on the moon is that there is not one single crater that's been made from a 90 degree angle 😅😅😅... It just makes me laugh now when I watch these Disney movies 😅😅😅
@@thejedi5079 Craters form from the sudden and instant vaporization and explosive shockwave of the impactor. These bodies are moving 20 to 60 km/s. Also, there are many craters that show a low angle of impact trajectory. A home telescope can show you those.
The simple answer is that going there in the first place in 1969 was the end result of a super power dick measuring contest. America proved it's prowess and the USSR kept quiet about its shortcomings for more than twenty years. It was quite simply about prestige, not science. It all started with a question to then NASA chief "What could we do to beat the Russians in space?". The answers were all a bit vague and boring except for one - putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. NASA knew it would take a lot of effort and funding but that it was feasible. One man, one decade - catchy proposal! So, the technology was already within grasp in 1961 but just not fully developed. Add billions of dollars, the sharpest minds of a nation and the undying support of the government and you have yourself a moon flight. Remember that the Eniac computer calculated trajectories in three dimensions all the way back in the forties so computers weren't all that new.
They have been busy with many other projects, they had already done it 6 ( + 3 ) times, the Apollo technology was becoming obsolete, there were no more huge Saturn V5 rockets available ( the last ones were spent along with some rebuilt Apollo spacecrafts on the Spacelab & the Apollo-Soyuz projects in the mid-70s ), and NASA's budgets were cut drastically after 1972. A lot of the subcontractors started doing other things or went bust, their production lines were scrapped, NASA experts resigned, were fired, retired or started working on other projects etc. When you see it in that light, it's really not that hard to understand what happened - we still know exactly how to go there ( have NOT forgotten or lost it, as some people like to claim 🙄 ), but we simply haven't had the actual components ready at hand ( until now! ), nor the trained experts and their experience and practical knowhow - and what would be the point anyway of just redoing what was already done 6 ( + 3 ) times with obsolete technology and methods? So of course you have to reinvent everything for a new Moon program with modern technology, new methods and advanced and very powerful and efficient computers and robot technology etc. , but naturally with the very valuable experiences of the Apollo program in mind.
@@dizzy6277 thanks for the science. So no CONDUCTION or CONVECTION of heat away from the Moon's surface. Even if 99.9% of solar radiation was able to REFLECT from the Moon's surface the Moon's surface would be so hot no-one would consider stepping on it.
I grew up in the early 80s my first few books as a kid showed moon bases, mars exploration, O’Neil cylinders and stories of how we’d achieve all this by the year 2000. Here I am in 2023, aged 44 and I can safely tell you the whole past 44 years has been a big disappointment. We’ve done absolutely nothing in space for 44 years other than a telescope and a few probes, think about that for a moment. But hey we got sports stadiums and some stupid TV shows as well as a few new roads. Yippee. Yay futurism and big dreams.
over 500k Earthlings venture out into deep space mining an heavy construction .. Then you have Security that travels with them .. the Security are the Silver cigars, with a 100, scouts concertinaed into them, 100scouts, 33ft in Diameter thats 6crew per craft....
I'll soon be 58. Think how I must feel. I look at stuff like this and seriously, wonder if it will ever, happen within my lifetime. If I'll ever, live long enough to see any of it for real. Yes, it is beyond disappointing. What is even, more disappointing is that we live in a world today, and with a generation that has absolutely, no vision, what-so-ever. None at all. A mindless, drone, generation is all we have today, very, sadly.
@@ivanj.conway9919 well it’s only JUST become possible now thanks to Elon Musk. It will all begin to happen over the next 5-10 years. (Doesn’t change the fact that it took far too long, but at least someone came along they could make it happen). So start eating your berries and nuts and live till 80 you’ll see it all.
@@ivanj.conway9919 also the mindless drone generation part, yes I agree, how ever don’t worry about that, as the demographic switches into uselessness, AI will begin to take over and do what humans used to do.
They say the moon rocks are lacking water,, I never found a rock that had water in it unless they were wet, but when they dry no water in them.. Guess I am stupid....
@Smee Self Did you saw the nukes of Saddam Hussein ? Some say that Oussama did WTC 2001 did he the 1993 WTC ? ehh 1993 was it the time he was trained by the CIA ? the UAP hearing at the Senate and congress ...they are skipping many proof as all top gun f-18 pilots and radar , what many saw with their own eyes . I don't t believe anything coming from government no more , I' m 56 , I saw too much in 40 years to be naive .
very valid questions Mick! ive been a commercial glazier for 26 years and i now work in the city of london.I regulary look at the old world buildings and think how did they make that? on the minimum wage with horse and cart.Look at the monument in fish street hill,allegedley built in 1671.And who built st pauls cathedral?
If we can refine Titanium on the moon , we can build spaceships from it . Mars landers and such . Such a great spot for shipyards 1/7G makes it SOOOO much easier to get off Most of what is needed for ships to go further out . Love to see the first Mars ship with its name painted on it-------FURTHER !!!!
i shall open a pet shop on the moon. the pets will be deceased but with no O2, no bacteria, they won't decompose and stay shiny forever. Easily posed, very low maintenance, self-propelled silent outdoor real pet. Lasts forever, upgradeable, customizable, supplied with tether and pet noises sound file.
Frankly, I think the entire solar system should be granted SSSI status (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) and private companies should be banned from harvesting its resources, to keep the planets as pristine environments.
Feel free to present your world-changing substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that both refuted the mountains of evidence we have to prove we landed men on the Moon as well as every single credible scientist and expert in the entire world has to say about it. 😎
@@garnet4846 It is said that the US public education system is run down and under financed. Also known as the dumbing down of America. Your tollish comments clearly demonstrates that it's true. 😂
We sbould never have stopped. If we had kept going and kept building and developing our space programs and research and development we'd be 500 years ahead in technology and well into steps closer to being a space faring race.
Why do you think that we stopped? I don't understand why some people think that after the Apollo missions NASA (and the rest) stopped doing anything. When it comes to human space flight they just focused on going cheap and often into low earth orbit, so they build the space shuttle. A NASA manager calls it the best and most complex machine ever built by engineers. It brought up the Hubble telescope, which gave us new and amazing pictures and insights of the universe. It has built the ISS, the biggest man made object in space ever, which is running for more than 20 years now, and is inhabitated without a break. And of course we send probes to all planets in the solar system, plus moons and asteroids. And the some even has left the solar system. We had several rovers on Mars. We have built the James Webb Telescope. Yes, of course we could have done even more (NASA bugdet was heavily reduced after the Apollo missions). But to say that we have stopped and would be 500 years ahead is just wrong.
@@sebastiannolte1201 clearly you haven't spent enough time doing your research or at least watching documentaries on our space development programs post space shuttle retirement.
I'm not particularly thrilled by this episode either. I mean... it's being possible to put together a bunch of statements about traveling to the moon that make sense doesn't value create. I mean, some of us are greedy enough to keep the rest of humanity eating itself into extinction. They'll make sure that those finite earthly resources go to that end rather than.... mooning the world.
Recent discoveries of how certain bacteria can generate electrical current by using only hydrogen as input (unlike burning it or fuel cells, which need oxygen as well), makes water on the moon even more potentially beneficial. Meaning that if we could devise a way to use the same process at scale - Then we could split water. Get electricity and also oxygen to breath. Oxygen which doesn't have to be reserved to be recombined with hydrogen to get electricity again.
We already could have zero point energy for decades since Tesla 100 years ago already found it and tested it. All solar panels, nuclear , coal and gas turbnines are old obsolete primitive junk
#1 - The moon contains no known "deposits" of iron and titanium. Like Earth's rocks, iron and titanium oxides and silicates make up a large fraction of the moon's bulk matrix. It's not worth going there for something that you can get just as easily on Earth.
@@jean-francoislemieux5509 exactly the moon consistently gets new deposits and the idea of netting and directing them to impact into the moon won't be far off.
The discovery is not of "deposits." Titanium is widespread across the moon as the mineral Ilmenite. This has been known for decades. Imagine the mining infrastructure that would have to be transported to the moon to refine Titanium ore from lunar regolith. Even on Earth, it is one of the most difficult metals to extract and refine from the ore. That's why it's so expensive! Not because it's a rare mineral. (Titanium is very common on Earth.) This is pure fantasy, meant only to entice investment money from easily duped investors. @@favesongslist
They aren't needed for use on Earth. Its about getting them into orbit in the shape of useful stuff. The difference in shipping costs from Earth surface vs from the Moon's surface are what makes it worth while!
It is exciting that our leaders have begun to see the great potentials in planetary explorations that will yield much in unraveling the mysteries yet to be uncovered in the cosmos instead in squandering our human and economic resources toward greater more powerful weapons that can lead our species and civilizations to their demise ; which is Madness !
Agree, it makes me angry how destroying our planet isn’t enough. I worry about the future that’s left in the hands of these people. Who do they think they are.
No cgi ever used other than for artistic renderings. no hoaxes. They landed the first time in 69 that is a fact . You probably were not even born in that time.
You obviously have no knowledge of photography. Go out in the daytime and try to photograph stars. There is too much contrast to pick them up. Get real buddy!
I'm still to be convinced that "man" actually stepped on the moon in the first place! but the fact that they've discovered they can make a LOT of money from doing so, makes me think they'll put every effort an pay any cost to be the first to lay claim to it!!!!
Just curious that if humans built structures on the moon surface, what chances are there of a rock from space hitting them. Just that they talk about rocks hitting the moon frequently so that would be quite risky for such an expensive structure and the people living inside. I guess it is a big place so the odds are in their favour.
Rock’s hit just as frequently to earth as the moon. So they would be quite safe but everything else is quite hard there like living in vacuum of the Space and collecting resources and fixing everything.
@@daveeol1987 most burn up or bounce back like Rock’s skip on water surface but still everyday there is pieces falling down to earth somewhere most just drop to remote places like ocean, there is very small chance to get hit either in earth or moon. That is not the problem. Getting there and getting the resources there and making things like water and air also food and energy and radiation is huge problem in moon and Space also maintenance work is way harder in moon. But still seems really odd that we havent made base there since moon missions. Hope that we do it really soon.
I've never understood how the moonwalkers weren't hit by meteorites. A hundred tons of meteorites hit the Earth annually so it must be worse on the Moon without an atmosphere.
#2 - I pay close attention to this sort of thing, and I haven't heard anything about Gerrard O'Neil's fanciful ideas for colonizing space in over 30 years. Nobody is looking seriously at it anymore.
UA-camr’s Isaac Arthur and John Michael Godier (Event Horizon as well as his personal channel) have both discussed it. Also Jeff Bezo’s has made it clear that that’s the direction he’s headed in (he was a student of O’Neil).
The lunar rover. Not hard to work that one out. Look up a channel homemade documentaries. You will believe they landed on the moon and curse the day you were ever naive to it.
Soo... a bulldozer's weight on the moon is 1/6 of the weight on earth and does not have enough mass to dig or move soil? Doesn't the moon's ground also has 1/6 of the mass on earth, making the forces even?
No, the composition of the moon is similar to the earth, so the rocks are just as hard. If you were correct that woull make all of the scientists and engineers working on the problem dumber than you, which I seriously doubt.
Look they told us they went so it must be true!!! I'm so clever cos I believe it without needing any proof, only idjuts would argue the point cos clever people believe wot the teacher sex!!! It was in the newspapers for god's sake.
Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 🤣
It can't it's impossible the radiation is so high nothing can survive it. It's takes X amounts of lead shielding to stop gamma rays the reality is there's no engine with enough power to lift such a craft that could protect anything living
It’s the 21st Century. Why on Earth do we have to tolerate content using miles, pounds, farenheight, etc? NASA don’t use imperial measurements. ESA, Spacex, JAXA, The Chinese, Indians and Russians certainly don’t either!
What about static electricity on the moon, if there was some way of putting a repulsive charge on machines for lunar excavation this may help with the lunar dust problem ?
Because the crap online conspiracy theory that you yourself place your faith in is entirely and unfailingly honest, unwaveringly accurate and consistent, not in the least bit intentionally deceptive, misleading, fallacious, exploitative, opportunistic monetised or manipulative and with your best interests at heart is completely free of vested interest and agenda? Righto then. Incidentally, known science and technology is not about 'belief'.
Feel free to present your world-changing substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that both refuted the mountains of evidence we have to prove we landed men on the Moon as well as every single credible scientist and expert in the entire world has to say about it.
I don’t want humans messing up the Moon. They are forgetting that sharp clinging dust that wrecked the astronauts suits, the reason they didn’t send more people there.🖤🇨🇦
That would be the robots they had in the 1960's and early 70's...yeah right it wouldn't be hard to do if they filmed it somewhere on earth and just told everybody it was the moon
@@happychappy492 ◁=== Conspiracy Enthusiasts like this one are people who consider themselves the Custodians of 'special' insider information that the rest of humanity doesn't know about. That's because they're 'Special' people.
There's 50 years of published international study into Apollo lunar sample return. Several nations have confirmed Apollo landing sites. Why do you include yourself in 'we'? We don't include you.
@@patrikpass2962 So you're also a gullible conspiracy believer that is incapable of thinking for yourself or placing a quote mined sentence that online grifters presented to you in its intended context? Do you have a mind of your own or anything vaguely resembling an original thought or observation ever even occasionally entering it?
@@patrikpass2962 So so many proofs man landed on the moon, yet 'people' like you still think we didn't. It's 2024, stop showing the world how stupid you are!
At last ! The definitive proof that the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions didn't happen. Thank you Mr Hurst, for your enlightened 'heads up' about all this. We should be all deeply grateful to be in the presence of a profoundly 'knowledgeable' fellow such as yourself. 🙃
The title of the video "(Man) Back to the Moon" is wrong, man has never been on the moon except in the Hollywood movies. The title of the video should be "(Man) Going to the Moon."
#3 - I am taken aback by the suggestion that we didn't have the technology to analyse for water in (moon) rocks 50 years ago. I did just that for the Ontario Geological Survey Laboratories in my youth.
That means they are lying and is anyone surprised with that ?
@@happychappy492 They are not "lying". But they are bending the truth in order to make the discovery of small amounts of water appear more ground-breaking than it really was.
It's bs, like everything is new, because we're doing it now.
@@happychappy492 That doesn't mean they're lying because you don't do anything to confirm it. Since you're not confirming it, you're not in a position to know if someone is lying.
If you don't have an argument, confirming that someone is lying, then that someone is not lying. He is simply saying.
Look at the OFFICIAL press conference of the apollo 11 astronauts. Enough said ;)
5 minutes from start is enough for that Cringe-fest
I enjoyed not wasting my time on UA-cam after a very long time. Thanks PBS.
me too
try the why files . i like the fish
hey human
Thankyou PBS. We hear far too little inspiring and exciting ventures of Humankind. This one definitely has put a smile on my face, and a surging spirit in my heart. Cheers
Dave... you're easily impressed. And I'll bet you're still waiting for HAL to open the pod bay doors. 😂
Thank you for uploading a 3 year old video ?
Wake up.
@rado van How stupid do you have to be to believe what you believe? Answer: PRETTY DAMN STUPID.
People dying on our own planet of starvation, and we gonna waste billions on visiting are rock... yup, were an advanced human race eh??
They didn't even mention all the cheese up there.
Shhhh! Secret. Gone green anyways...😆
or the man that was already on the moon and that cow that jumped over it a long time ago
It tastes like Wensleydale Grommet! 😃
water is the cheese. Or 'unobtainium' in avatar-speak.
I believe an Apollo astronaut did say it was made of cheese, American cheese.
This is from 2019 and it feels like its from 2016
Ok kid
ok boomer.
@@NiktheGreek7 Ok, Groomer
A prison on the Moon would be the ultimate Super Max prison. It would be a great place to exile the worst of the worst.
DJT
You never watched Men in Black 3 then..??
Why bother?
Or how about the first war between Earthlings and Moonlings ? If the moon is colonized the Earth/Moon war will be bound to happen.
@Wildstar40 Dude. This has already happened. Our solar system war. The asteroid belt, was once a planet that was destroyed in a star wars.
Hey PBS, can you please include the original airdate in the description? Things are rapidly changing in space exploration so it’s important for people to know if this is up-to-date information. According to Wikipedia this was aired on July 10th 2019, 3 years before Artemis I successfully launched and completed, and before the Dear Moon crew announcement.
It also aired a good 10 months before SpaceX sent the very first crew to the ISS aboard Crew Dragon Demo 2. And in addition to that demonstration flight, there have now been 6 crews flown to and from the ISS.
At one point they mentioned an upcoming 2008 launch, this was recorded some 15 years ago 🙄
@@michaelholmes8848 could u give the time stamp?
It says in the end credits 2019
space may be the final frontier but its made in a hollywood basement...
This is what humanity suppose to do create unity work together..not that stupid war.
I have followed the space programme since the late 1950 and hope now to see the moon base started,
Thank you for posting this.
A moon base is possible, but even an asteroid the size of a marble can completely obliterate a base about the size of two shipping containers. It would hit with the force of about 3 pounds of dynamite and at 162 000 mph will always penetrate any thickness of wall, of any substance.
@@elitiller8623 well, an asteroid could obliterate earth too, what evs.
@@elitiller8623 smal chance it would destroy the moon base.. we have the possibility of tsunamis, tornados, wars.. volcanos, asteroids, on earth and we don't die on mass constantly
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 Anything smaller than 50m never makes it through the atmosphere with enough left to do anything but shatter some windows. The chance of anything over city-killer, is once every million years.
Basically, we don't build a house in the forest as it burns.
@@mymixedbiscuit9159 We will have accomplished that before the next one large enough is due.
Helium 3 can be mined from Lunar soil. If commercial fusion power comes on line this will prove an extremely valuable resource.
LOL
No it wont
They are mining this already for decades. Sleapy head
No forests, no rivers, no bacon and steak on the grill, no beers, no bikini's around.. nah.. i'll stay here :-)
😂😂😂 am staying too ! 😅
Nobody is talking you there either 🌝
@@neon_arch you just did you C!
Well the first cleanup mission is to retrieve the diapers the first missions to the moon left behind. They've become a historic artefact proving the Americans did go to the Moon... The diapers could prove how if possible bacteria and germs survive in space - space being deprived of oxygen and water in general but in return have a lot of radiation could prove to be an important clue to the possibility of the theory of the Earth could have been seeded with life being struck by meteorites. I think it was Buzz Aldrin making jokes about the diapers could be having an impact on the future - aliens investigating the diapers to determine how the physiology of the humans worked...
@@neon_archwith a bonehead comment like that I suppose you’re the top of the list to go?
49:38 - love the side-skipping, followed by the reverse-slide 'moon walk'. Nice one.
To infinity and BEYOND 👊
Thx for the inspiring video. 👍
Well done again Nova and PBS. a wonderfully informative inspiring show. Thank you. Space is indeed for now at least the final frontier for humanity. We are a curious species, its only natural for us to strive to be a a multi planet species... imagine. what awaits us ...see you out there...
Unfortunately not in your life time, they're still struggling to find the lost technology from the 1960s.
What if the aliens are mining for the same thing on the moon.
Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving. -Albert Einstein
I have noticed this about dead people.
@@garyfrancis6193 Yes, zombies often struggle to keep their balance, and they always keep moving.
Heavily-laid on music: exactly like a Marvel superhero movie -- and a mentality to match. Couldn't stick it for more than 8 minutes. 😆
Hida Cowboy, hows it doin?
What really 🤔 bothers me about the craters on the moon is that there is not one single crater that's been made from a 90 degree angle 😅😅😅...
It just makes me laugh now when I watch these Disney movies 😅😅😅
@@thejedi5079 Craters form from the sudden and instant vaporization and explosive shockwave of the impactor. These bodies are moving 20 to 60 km/s. Also, there are many craters that show a low angle of impact trajectory. A home telescope can show you those.
NOVA docos ate dimply awesome and such beautifully made! 😊😊
Back to the moon after 50 years. Now that’s progress.
still belive,they go there😄 1969
Its the same as "Back to the future" sfi.
@@jeesusaamen6753 We have the proof. Get lost
The simple answer is that going there in the first place in 1969 was the end result of a super power dick measuring contest. America proved it's prowess and the USSR kept quiet about its shortcomings for more than twenty years. It was quite simply about prestige, not science. It all started with a question to then NASA chief "What could we do to beat the Russians in space?". The answers were all a bit vague and boring except for one - putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. NASA knew it would take a lot of effort and funding but that it was feasible. One man, one decade - catchy proposal!
So, the technology was already within grasp in 1961 but just not fully developed. Add billions of dollars, the sharpest minds of a nation and the undying support of the government and you have yourself a moon flight. Remember that the Eniac computer calculated trajectories in three dimensions all the way back in the forties so computers weren't all that new.
They have been busy with many other projects, they had already done it 6 ( + 3 ) times, the Apollo technology was becoming obsolete, there were no more huge Saturn V5 rockets available ( the last ones were spent along with some rebuilt Apollo spacecrafts on the Spacelab & the Apollo-Soyuz projects in the mid-70s ), and NASA's budgets were cut drastically after 1972.
A lot of the subcontractors started doing other things or went bust, their production lines were scrapped, NASA experts resigned, were fired, retired or started working on other projects etc.
When you see it in that light, it's really not that hard to understand what happened - we still know exactly how to go there ( have NOT forgotten or lost it, as some people like to claim 🙄 ), but we simply haven't had the actual components ready at hand ( until now! ), nor the trained experts and their experience and practical knowhow - and what would be the point anyway of just redoing what was already done 6 ( + 3 ) times with obsolete technology and methods?
So of course you have to reinvent everything for a new Moon program with modern technology, new methods and advanced and very powerful and efficient computers and robot technology etc. , but naturally with the very valuable experiences of the Apollo program in mind.
Thank you for this beatiful content although we never forgot the Moon, we were banned for 50 years!
If you know you know. It's not going " back" it's trying to do it for real for the first time 🥇🚀
shhhhhh.. let the adults watch mate.
What are the properties of a vacuum? can an educated adult scientist please say, I guess they will not put their name to it
@@mangeygypsynunya6451 the dumb adults
@@neilpike6758 A vacuum is empty space, without matter.
@@dizzy6277 thanks for the science. So no CONDUCTION or CONVECTION of heat away from the Moon's surface. Even if 99.9% of solar radiation was able to REFLECT from the Moon's surface the Moon's surface would be so hot no-one would consider stepping on it.
I love this channel
Hard work but not IMPOSSIBLE 💜
Good then? You pay more this time only! Only drill and steel the moon the human not need it on eart?
Nice presentation thank you!
All the best for selenophiles... 🌖
😮😮😮people, we haven't even explored 80% of the sea and the land, and we were like on the moon....YES WOW
I grew up in the early 80s my first few books as a kid showed moon bases, mars exploration, O’Neil cylinders and stories of how we’d achieve all this by the year 2000.
Here I am in 2023, aged 44 and I can safely tell you the whole past 44 years has been a big disappointment. We’ve done absolutely nothing in space for 44 years other than a telescope and a few probes, think about that for a moment.
But hey we got sports stadiums and some stupid TV shows as well as a few new roads. Yippee. Yay futurism and big dreams.
One would think that it would be easyer to fake the moon landings today as it wes back then.
over 500k Earthlings venture out into deep space mining an heavy construction ..
Then you have Security that travels with them ..
the Security are the Silver cigars, with a 100, scouts concertinaed into them, 100scouts, 33ft in Diameter thats 6crew per craft....
I'll soon be 58. Think how I must feel. I look at stuff like this and seriously, wonder if it will ever, happen within my lifetime. If I'll ever, live long enough to see any of it for real. Yes, it is beyond disappointing. What is even, more disappointing is that we live in a world today, and with a generation that has absolutely, no vision, what-so-ever. None at all. A mindless, drone, generation is all we have today, very, sadly.
@@ivanj.conway9919 well it’s only JUST become possible now thanks to Elon Musk. It will all begin to happen over the next 5-10 years. (Doesn’t change the fact that it took far too long, but at least someone came along they could make it happen). So start eating your berries and nuts and live till 80 you’ll see it all.
@@ivanj.conway9919 also the mindless drone generation part, yes I agree, how ever don’t worry about that, as the demographic switches into uselessness, AI will begin to take over and do what humans used to do.
I love your work
31:05 on the time counter. Anyone else see the bird that's about to have a very bad day?
Omg rip bird
Hehe was just thinking watching your mars program, id need all of your shows to keep me entertained on that long journey..
They say the moon rocks are lacking water,, I never found a rock that had water in it unless they were wet, but when they dry no water in them.. Guess I am stupid....
Thanks
Back to the moon for the first time
😊
😉
@Smee Self 😄
@Smee Self
Did you saw the nukes of Saddam Hussein ?
Some say that Oussama did WTC 2001
did he the 1993 WTC ?
ehh 1993 was it the time he was trained by the CIA ?
the UAP hearing at the Senate and
congress ...they are skipping many
proof as all top gun f-18 pilots and
radar , what many saw with their own
eyes .
I don't t believe anything coming from government no more , I' m 56 ,
I saw too much in 40 years to be
naive .
Enjoyed
Human greed knows no bounds
very valid questions Mick! ive been a commercial glazier for 26 years and i now work in the city of london.I regulary look at the old world buildings and think how did they make that? on the minimum wage with horse and cart.Look at the monument in fish street hill,allegedley built in 1671.And who built st pauls cathedral?
I really miss Liev Schreiber doing narration for NOVA.
Whoa Sabertooth did narration 😮
@@sourabhkarmakar8040 ua-cam.com/video/y_BL0M08-B4/v-deo.html among many others, including the original 'To the Moon' from 1999.
If we can refine Titanium on the moon , we can build spaceships from it . Mars landers and such . Such a great spot for shipyards 1/7G makes it SOOOO much easier to get off Most of what is needed for ships to go further out . Love to see the first Mars ship with its name painted on it-------FURTHER !!!!
When are you going to switch to the metric system America?
i shall open a pet shop on the moon. the pets will be deceased but with no O2, no bacteria, they won't decompose and stay shiny forever. Easily posed, very low maintenance, self-propelled silent outdoor real pet. Lasts forever, upgradeable, customizable, supplied with tether and pet noises sound file.
Yep. 'Walkies' will consist of one boot up the tail & an elastic lead. No doggy bags either....jobs a good un! 😆
@@dominicseanmccann6300 🤣😅😂
Poop bag solutions 😂
Very good so far into human exploration , but knowing humanity as we now do it's difficult to imagine mining the moon as peaceful .
Frankly, I think the entire solar system should be granted SSSI status (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) and private companies should be banned from harvesting its resources, to keep the planets as pristine environments.
What is there that corporations could extract for profit? Data?
Have to go there 1st In order to to back
That was done in 1969. So yes, we are 'going back'.
Hahaha.... Going back to the moon, they say??? We have "yet" to go there 🤣🤣🤣
Thumbs up for my exact comment.
Feel free to present your world-changing substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that both refuted the mountains of evidence we have to prove we landed men on the Moon as well as every single credible scientist and expert in the entire world has to say about it. 😎
@@garnet4846 It is said that the US public education system is run down and under financed. Also known as the dumbing down of America. Your tollish comments clearly demonstrates that it's true. 😂
We sbould never have stopped. If we had kept going and kept building and developing our space programs and research and development we'd be 500 years ahead in technology and well into steps closer to being a space faring race.
Why do you think that we stopped? I don't understand why some people think that after the Apollo missions NASA (and the rest) stopped doing anything. When it comes to human space flight they just focused on going cheap and often into low earth orbit, so they build the space shuttle. A NASA manager calls it the best and most complex machine ever built by engineers. It brought up the Hubble telescope, which gave us new and amazing pictures and insights of the universe. It has built the ISS, the biggest man made object in space ever, which is running for more than 20 years now, and is inhabitated without a break.
And of course we send probes to all planets in the solar system, plus moons and asteroids. And the some even has left the solar system. We had several rovers on Mars. We have built the James Webb Telescope.
Yes, of course we could have done even more (NASA bugdet was heavily reduced after the Apollo missions). But to say that we have stopped and would be 500 years ahead is just wrong.
@@sebastiannolte1201 clearly you haven't spent enough time doing your research or at least watching documentaries on our space development programs post space shuttle retirement.
If one of those companies isn't called Wayland Yutani I'm going to be disappointed
Ship must be the Nostromo
PBS - get with the times. This production pace and quality is worthy of the 90's not the 2020's.
I'm not particularly thrilled by this episode either.
I mean... it's being possible to put together a bunch of statements about traveling to the moon that make sense doesn't value create.
I mean, some of us are greedy enough to keep the rest of humanity eating itself into extinction. They'll make sure that those finite earthly resources go to that end rather than.... mooning the world.
Recent discoveries of how certain bacteria can generate electrical current by using only hydrogen as input (unlike burning it or fuel cells, which need oxygen as well), makes water on the moon even more potentially beneficial. Meaning that if we could devise a way to use the same process at scale - Then we could split water. Get electricity and also oxygen to breath. Oxygen which doesn't have to be reserved to be recombined with hydrogen to get electricity again.
We already could have zero point energy for decades since Tesla 100 years ago already found it and tested it. All solar panels, nuclear , coal and gas turbnines are old obsolete primitive junk
PBS always give us fine content i love it, specially Frontline and Nova ofcourse.
you can't go back to the moon, Stanley Kubrick is gone, who's going to make a new movie??? James Cameron!!!!
#1 - The moon contains no known "deposits" of iron and titanium. Like Earth's rocks, iron and titanium oxides and silicates make up a large fraction of the moon's bulk matrix. It's not worth going there for something that you can get just as easily on Earth.
asteroids...
@@jean-francoislemieux5509 exactly the moon consistently gets new deposits and the idea of netting and directing them to impact into the moon won't be far off.
In 2009 NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), discovered titanium deposits at high concentrations.
The discovery is not of "deposits." Titanium is widespread across the moon as the mineral Ilmenite. This has been known for decades. Imagine the mining infrastructure that would have to be transported to the moon to refine Titanium ore from lunar regolith. Even on Earth, it is one of the most difficult metals to extract and refine from the ore. That's why it's so expensive! Not because it's a rare mineral. (Titanium is very common on Earth.) This is pure fantasy, meant only to entice investment money from easily duped investors. @@favesongslist
They aren't needed for use on Earth. Its about getting them into orbit in the shape of useful stuff. The difference in shipping costs from Earth surface vs from the Moon's surface are what makes it worth while!
It is exciting that our leaders have begun to see the great potentials in planetary explorations that will yield much in unraveling the mysteries yet to be uncovered in the cosmos instead in squandering our human and economic resources toward greater more powerful weapons that can lead our species and civilizations to their demise ; which is Madness !
Well, I want my moon to remain just way it's. I don't wanna see my moon destroyed by people who wanna mine it.
In 200 years they'll all be like, 'oh dear, those idiots should never have mined so much crap out of the moon!'
Agree, it makes me angry how destroying our planet isn’t enough. I worry about the future that’s left in the hands of these people. Who do they think they are.
Well said
whoever made the Moon the exact size it is and put it exactly where it is I doubt will let us just strip mine the Moon....
Brett Denevi IS a heavenly body 😮
& with all the CGI available these days…it’s gonna be amazing!!
No cgi ever used other than for artistic renderings. no hoaxes. They landed the first time in 69 that is a fact . You probably were not even born in that time.
Try thinking with your brain, not your old fella.
extraspecialmongo should be your username.
@@BalrajTakhar-u7u idiot
Love it...
50 years ago the moon landing staff forgot to paint the stars in the backdrop...
And the Sun.😆
You obviously have no knowledge of photography. Go out in the daytime and try to photograph stars. There is too much contrast to pick them up. Get real buddy!
Resource (elements) extraction makes sense
I'm still to be convinced that "man" actually stepped on the moon in the first place!
but the fact that they've discovered they can make a LOT of money from doing so, makes me think they'll put every effort an pay any cost to be the first to lay claim to it!!!!
👍-up if you believe we never went like Buzz accidentally said.
He said nothing of the sort - unless of course you are dim enough to believe what quote mining out of context conspiracy theory tells you to think.
Just curious that if humans built structures on the moon surface, what chances are there of a rock from space hitting them. Just that they talk about rocks hitting the moon frequently so that would be quite risky for such an expensive structure and the people living inside. I guess it is a big place so the odds are in their favour.
Rock’s hit just as frequently to earth as the moon. So they would be quite safe but everything else is quite hard there like living in vacuum of the Space and collecting resources and fixing everything.
@Og gamer they burn up in earth's atmosphere. No atmosphere on the moon
@@daveeol1987 most burn up or bounce back like Rock’s skip on water surface but still everyday there is pieces falling down to earth somewhere most just drop to remote places like ocean, there is very small chance to get hit either in earth or moon. That is not the problem. Getting there and getting the resources there and making things like water and air also food and energy and radiation is huge problem in moon and Space also maintenance work is way harder in moon. But still seems really odd that we havent made base there since moon missions. Hope that we do it really soon.
I've never understood how the moonwalkers weren't hit by meteorites. A hundred tons of meteorites hit the Earth annually so it must be worse on the Moon without an atmosphere.
A lot worse and larger ones not being burnt up by the atmosphere here on earth..
1:07 - I’d say Life would be the most significant discovery but hey - it’s just me. 🎉😂
#2 - I pay close attention to this sort of thing, and I haven't heard anything about Gerrard O'Neil's fanciful ideas for colonizing space in over 30 years. Nobody is looking seriously at it anymore.
Which points to this being propaganda and just another addition to bread and circus's
@@happychappy492 Prove you assertions or STFU. 😎
Have you not seen Jeff Bezos presentation on the goals for Blue Origin?
@@favesongslist I'd be happy to send both Bezos and Musk to the moon. Permanently.
UA-camr’s Isaac Arthur and John Michael Godier (Event Horizon as well as his personal channel) have both discussed it. Also Jeff Bezo’s has made it clear that that’s the direction he’s headed in (he was a student of O’Neil).
2:30 interesting how it just leaps up into orbit ! 😂😂😂
2:24 who filmed 🎥 this??? Seems like an old Hollywood movie studio location 🤔 😅
The lunar rover. Not hard to work that one out. Look up a channel homemade documentaries. You will believe they landed on the moon and curse the day you were ever naive to it.
America never went to the moon - only Arizona. Kubrik's finest work
I hope this time would not shot in a studio.😂
Maybe be able to make a documentary using real footage instead of animated.
They will be showing this video in five years and still no return.
Dimwit!
That's funny.....
(It wasn't shot in a studio the first time!)
Crazy to see Mike Pence in this documentary... Should be the next one we send on the moon. One way budget ticket. Lol
Soo... a bulldozer's weight on the moon is 1/6 of the weight on earth and does not have enough mass to dig or move soil? Doesn't the moon's ground also has 1/6 of the mass on earth, making the forces even?
yeah that idea of his doesn't hold weight lol
No, the composition of the moon is similar to the earth, so the rocks are just as hard. If you were correct that woull make all of the scientists and engineers working on the problem dumber than you, which I seriously doubt.
@@lotuselansteve I was talking about loose rubble, not solid rock
Oh dear...
This is heavy.
"Hello tomorrow" for real lol
Back to the moon? No humans had ever landed on the moon yet!
If you say so Mr 'knowledgeable' NOT
Very very smart....
A rocket factory on the moon?
200 hundred years away.
Now is that a measurement of time or distance ?
and rocket feul
The movie Elysium - this is where the film makers got the idea from. Wow, this is astonishing.
I had the lunar landing pod and all my grandma for me , I had ro glue it all together it was exciting
Was it theone that landed😂
Tough to go back to a place you've never been before. What happened to the technology that got them there in the first place?
go back to sleep mate.
Look they told us they went so it must be true!!! I'm so clever cos I believe it without needing any proof, only idjuts would argue the point cos clever people believe wot the teacher sex!!! It was in the newspapers for god's sake.
Correct. Of course, they say they don't have the technology anymore. Convenient. Many people are so easily deceived.
Firing high speed projectiles into a litter box. 🤣
The dust at the moon will stop everything.
The Americans have never been to the moon in their lives!
Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 🤣
What if organic material can't survive passage through the Van Allen belt?
What if this. What if that. How about, what if you read up on the subject in an honest way. You know, get educated. Try to do better.
Better go and study James Van Allen’s work..
@@apolloskyfacer5842 😅😅😅 your a clown moon landing in Hollywood 😅😅😅 do you believe in Santa too? 😅
@@apolloskyfacer5842 😂😂 shut up you butthurt bob. Do better... 😂😂😂
It can't it's impossible the radiation is so high nothing can survive it. It's takes X amounts of lead shielding to stop gamma rays the reality is there's no engine with enough power to lift such a craft that could protect anything living
amazing
It’s the 21st Century. Why on Earth do we have to tolerate content using miles, pounds, farenheight, etc? NASA don’t use imperial measurements. ESA, Spacex, JAXA, The Chinese, Indians and Russians certainly don’t either!
Indeed
There's only 3 countries left in the world that exclusively use those units, so a very small and minority percentage of the World's population.
Shoosh...if its not broken
PBS Nova is an American TV series made for Americans - live with it 😉
PS I am thankfully not an American 😂
What about static electricity on the moon, if there was some way of putting a repulsive charge on machines for lunar excavation this may help with the lunar dust problem ?
Hokum, sheer greed, & Hokum!
agreed
👍-up if you believe we've been lied to about what space and the moon actually are.
Because the crap online conspiracy theory that you yourself place your faith in is entirely and unfailingly honest, unwaveringly accurate and consistent, not in the least bit intentionally deceptive, misleading, fallacious, exploitative, opportunistic monetised or manipulative and with your best interests at heart is completely free of vested interest and agenda? Righto then.
Incidentally, known science and technology is not about 'belief'.
31:06 The bird flying next to the rocket at launch. Cooked.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Kentucky Fried Pigeon minus the eleven herbs and spices 🤣
We Never Went!!!
exactly!
Feel free to present your world-changing substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that both refuted the mountains of evidence we have to prove we landed men on the Moon as well as every single credible scientist and expert in the entire world has to say about it.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 you drank all the kool-aid.
@@garnet4846 So says the conspiracy wing nut who lives in Dream Cuckoo La La Land
SO many countries are going to explore the Moon....except Russia.
Nastrowje!!!
I don’t want humans messing up the Moon. They are forgetting that sharp clinging dust that wrecked the astronauts suits, the reason they didn’t send more people there.🖤🇨🇦
Luddites are really boring 😒
Or they just stopped because it's just plain throwing money away on an expedition that will contribute absolutely nothing to human life on earth XD
Or it never happened
I was strolling on the moon one day in a Hollywood studio set 🤭 Woops did i just give it away 😂😂😂
Yes, you just revealed your stupidity to the world.
Just a question... who stayed and shot the lunar module taking off???🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
That would be the robots they had in the 1960's and early 70's...yeah right it wouldn't be hard to do if they filmed it somewhere on earth and just told everybody it was the moon
Go find out the answer to your question on the internet. Read up on the subject in an honest way. Try to do better.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 thats what you should do instead of believing everything the government tell you do better
I was hoping the guys with the NASA sticker would shed some light!!!🤔🤔🤔 Just wondering!!!
@@happychappy492 ◁=== Conspiracy Enthusiasts like this one are people who consider themselves the Custodians of 'special' insider information that the rest of humanity doesn't know about. That's because they're 'Special' people.
It will be amazing when we go to the moon for the first time.
There's 50 years of published international study into Apollo lunar sample return. Several nations have confirmed Apollo landing sites. Why do you include yourself in 'we'? We don't include you.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver I'm a clueless human just like you. Trying to, as Niel Armstrong said it, "peel away one of truths protective layers".
@@patrikpass2962
So you're also a gullible conspiracy believer that is incapable of thinking for yourself or placing a quote mined sentence that online grifters presented to you in its intended context? Do you have a mind of your own or anything vaguely resembling an original thought or observation ever even occasionally entering it?
@@patrikpass2962 So so many proofs man landed on the moon, yet 'people' like you still think we didn't. It's 2024, stop showing the world how stupid you are!
meanwhile earth is burning and nobody give a sh**
Long live Mother India
They never went there.
This video is all bread and circus's it is unbelievable how they lie to the public like this
At last ! The definitive proof that the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions didn't happen. Thank you Mr Hurst, for your enlightened 'heads up' about all this. We should be all deeply grateful to be in the presence of a profoundly 'knowledgeable' fellow such as yourself. 🙃
They did. Multiple times too. You should try this thing called education one day. I think it can really benefit you!
@@apolloskyfacer5842 don’t over do it young man,we all can’t be as intelligent as me.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 I recommend Sanity4Sweden - You Tube - as I am sure you have had all your cups of tea.
why was this uploaded 2 weeks ago when its 3 years old ? Get up to date PBS
never went
Did. SIX Moon Landings !
If we mine the moon it could completely devastate the dairy industry here on Earth. That's just way more cheese than what humanity could ever need.
Why aren’t Pizza Hut sponsoring Lunar exploration?
project slam dunk
A lot of bias in this, not sure why. Also surprised at the generally low quality of the comments here.
Duhhhmericans mostly, but surprisingly a smatter from other countries...special snowflakes all...
The title of the video "(Man) Back to the Moon" is wrong, man has never been on the moon except in the Hollywood movies. The title of the video should be "(Man) Going to the Moon."
go back to sleep joe.
Go back? Ha ha ha ha ha.