I learned that the co-axial rotor configuration eliminates the need for a tail rotor; reducing drag and improving speed and maneuverability. You will too because they say it 3 TIMES in the video. Stellar editing.
It's funny how they say it while showing images of the helicopter where you can clearly see it actually does have a tail rotor, but for a completely different purpose. Someone that isn't that much into helicopters will get very confused.
The strength and hugeness are apparent from her external appearance, and she will undoubtedly be very strong and intelligent, and she is the creation of great America. 🇺🇲👍💯
@@PhoneRepairs-m2n They'll still use all the technology gained from it into the reason this was cancelled. Helicopter drones using all this technology while the pilot is in a control helicopter meant to sit back in a safe position while orchestrating attacks from there. It's the same decision they made with the NGAD fighter program in which they can't go fully automated so they compromise with a mix of both. Either way this is much safer for pilots and we can expect fatalities to be incredibly reduced in war for pilots.
Flying inverted counts ONLY in the northern hemisphere, as everything and everyone is "upside down" down under.... That's why Aussies are so difficult to understand. Keewies, on the other hand, are just quaint anachronisms from the 1950s!!
Americas freedom is not cheap, there is a cost to it. In money, are technology is the best in the world. A cost of lives defending are freedoms. The worst thing a person can do, is betray their country. That gave us the freedom , and opportunity in this country.
very good for that encouragement and spirit of improvement, America has to be great again, it cannot be that the Chinese and the Russians are far above in terms of science, technology and academia, than the Americans
These new generation helicopters create thousands of high paying American jobs for at least 2 decades. The Blackhawk and Apache have been in service almost 50 years, it’s time to replace both.
The helicopter technologies ia old system because when there is heavy wind the helicopter fan is meaning less .the wind crash the helicopter . Why not create how to create heavy wind to wipe out .From front sides and downside and above the helicopter or upper part and back side . This is silly common sense . How the helicopter crash because of wind heavy .the heavy wind create problems. So you will helicopter technologies to wipe out the heavy wind from all angles .then you can stable the helicopter . The atmosphere is wind to wipe out heavy wind
muy bien por ese animo y espíritu de superación, américa tiene que ser grande de nuevo, no puede ser que los chino y los rusos están muy por encima en cuanto a ciencia, tecnología y academia, que los estadounidenses
@@محمدالعبادي-ظ9خ شكرا وان اقلك انت وأهم لولا رعب المقاومة في فلسطين ولبنان وسوريا والعراق وايران لم ولن ترا سلاح واحد انصر لله ينصرك على عدوك الجبان داعش ومن لف لفهم أسرائيل وغيرهم من المندسين من الوهابية الله يصلحك للخير
On 5 December 2022, the US Army selected the rival Bell V-280 Valor as the winner of the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft program. Thus, cancelling the SB-1 Defiant.
280 indeed win, and now it's another competition between the X-Raider and the 360 for Future Attack Recon Aircraft (FARA) which should see prototypes flying by 4Q24 because of the delays in receiving GE T901.
انتضروا المفاجأه من مصنع كاموف الروسي ولتعلموا ايها الام ر ي ك ان كل اسلحتكم افكارهامسروقه وليس لديكم تطور يحسب لكم فلا تسعدوا ولا تفخروا كثيراً تبقى روسيا 🇷🇺 المهيمنه على الفضاء الجوي وما هذه إلا حديد مهلهل
US military helicopters are integral to a wide range of missions, serving critical roles in combat support, troop transport, logistics, medical evacuation, and special operations. Key models include the UH-60 Black Hawk, renowned for its heavy-lift capability and versatility in roles like battlefield support and air assault. The AH-64 Apache stands out as the primary attack helicopter, equipped with advanced weaponry for engaging ground and naval targets with precision. The CH-47 Chinook excels in heavy-lift transport, capable of carrying substantial cargo and personnel for logistical support and emergency operations. The UH-1 Huey, famous for its historical significance, remains a stalwart in transport, medevac, and reconnaissance missions. Lastly, the MV-22 Osprey combines vertical takeoff and landing capability with fixed-wing flight, serving rapid deployment and specialized missions. These helicopters collectively enhance US military readiness and effectiveness across diverse operational scenarios.
If anything in my opinion can replace Blackhawk than it should be Defiant not Valor. Long-range Raider if able to carry all the weapons of apache then it could replace both Blackhawk and apache in the future. Awesome 👍
Defiant was outclassed in nearly every metric by the Valor... Not to mention the Defiant had a major crash of one of its prototypes delaying it 18 months.
Hopefully vastly improved. Blackhawk's survivability from ground fire hasn't ever been the greatest... Far more vulnerable than Russian Mi-24 or the like. @@allen480
Meanwhile, Russia rolls out their new paper tigers motivating the US Military Complex to skip to the next Generation while Russia factually rolls back to the end of the WWII.
What makes you think they're going that contemporary......slow down boss....end of WWII......kinda "rushing" things a bit ain't ya'!?.....see that sexy Maxim they rolled out in the TRENCH.....
The US is upgrading because of the challenges and opportunities offered by the vast Pacific Theatre rather than Russia's paper tigers. China offers a far greater threat if war breaks out.
Di youtube ada motor yg di gerakan oleh baling2 yg di putar oleh mesin. Mesin itu tidak memutar rantai untuk menggerakan roda, akan tetapi bisa berlari dengan sangat cepat. Artinya kalau di belakang helikopter ada baling2 yg menjadi pendorong agar bisa terbang dengan cepat itu wajar.
Need a decent editor to remove all the repetition - e.g. how many times was ‘coaxial counter rotating and pusher propellor’ repeated. Thanks for the video, but could be better
I've got a Popular Science magazine from the early '50's, showing something similar. It's been a long desired thing, airplane speed and rotary wing landing performance.
So many idiots in these comments thinking they're smarter than the engineers who were actually on the Osprey project. Despite the fact that it has one of the lowest mishaps per flight hour of any other aviation platform in US military service.
Exactly. Also stealth helli Comnache came came to the audition 15 years ago. You see how far behind We are in what We know about army tech and what is in development. I bet what We do know is 20 to 25 years begind in what is in development.
The Army chose the V-280 (like a Mini Osprey), not this Boeing piece of 💩! They realized that it was important that the Troops actually made it to the battlefield ! This thing Was a Russian Concept engineered in the 70's and repackaged by Boeing as New....
Secanggih apapun senjata dan alat perangmu gak ada apa apa nya kalau cuma untuk menghancurkan negara lain dan membunuh jutaan umat manusia di dunia yang gak bedosa.bukti masih kalah sama afganistan.ingat di atas langit masih ada langit.
미군은 동축반전을 싫어한다. 대신 텐덤반전을 애용해 왔다. 텐덤반전은 동축반전의 장점을 가지고 있으면서 동시에 단점도 커버한다. CH46, CH47이 텐덤반전이다. 동축반전은 복잡하고 유지운용도 어렵고 노출이 너무 커서 전술용으로 부적합하다. 한국공군이 수색 구조용으로 운용하고 있어 날라다니는걸 본 적이 있는데 명색이 구조용인데 나 여기 있다고 광고하고 다니고 있었다. 반면 UH60, AH64는 그에 비하면 정말 은밀히 기동한다. 큰 메인로타가 2개가 돌아가는데 노출이 안될 수가 있나? 민수용으로는 문제가 없다고 해도 군용으로는 부적합하다.
Dual rotors are MUCH QUIETER. During the Vietnam War, the enemy called one "the silent death." The Uh-1s and Cobras were very loud, giving great advance notice to the enemy.
The Defiant had multiple technical issues along with a crash that delayed it 18 months... it was also outperformed by the Valor in nearly every metric.
This is a marketing video that would make Elon Musk proud. For example, the V-22 is now being defunded - pushed out. Not to say that 300+% in cost increases have anything do with it. Nor do ongoing crashes that have resulted in it earning the moniker of "The Widow Maker", Japan recently grounding all of their V-22s, it having the reliability of a 1970s Italian sports car, or that all three US military branches that currently fly it don't want any more of them. But at least it only cost $120M a copy and maintenance cost will continue to skyrocket.
Frequent references throughout the video to improved speed, range, efficiency, etc, but zero numbers or what any of that means. Pretty pictures though.
Russia produces more aircraft every month then USA does in 2 years. Russia produces more tanks in a month then USA has in 19 years Russia produces enough ammunition and missiles as well as rocket's and drones to supply a 1 milllion man military in war right now.
Not being a jerk here but most homeless people I've encountered have chosen this lifestyle and, for some odd reason, enjoy it. Weird right but true. Oh yeah, why didn't the homeless go into the military to avoid the homeless lifestyle? this, of course, isn't all homeless but many. Like the majority. When that homeless guy walks into a hospital, Ifrom drink or whatever that stay is very, very, very expensive.q7bgrand a night plus. Also they're are plenty of decent paying jobs that don't even need a face to face interview. Homeless John doe or Jane doe can easily go to a library or call you up, and they can go to ups or amazon and get a job in a warehouse as long as they have a good bg they get hires after answering like 10 questions. Show up for training.bam, that's it. There are jobs like tgis all over the country, so excuse me if I chuckle at that comment you made.
no matter how fast the helicopter flies, a rocket priced at $ 25,000 will destroy the helicopter and electronic interference will not prevent the device from being destroyed for $ 1000,000,000
... Coaxial helicopter have existed way before the KA-52. Not to mention that the tech used on the Defiant is new as it is a rigid rotor system instead of the normal flexible one. This allows the blade to be a lot closer together and has increased mobility.
@@CivilRights8308 Corradino D'Ascanio Build the first flying coaxial helicopter in 1930 in France. Or the Bréguet-Dorand Gyroplane Laboratoire which was a more successful one of 1935 also in France. So again this tech has been in use for a while now and we do not say X country is copying German tech whenever they are building any jet.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 Listen-the idea of coaxial rotors originates with Mikhail Lomonosov.He had developed a small helicopter model with coaxial rotors in July,1754 and demonstrated it to the Russian Academy of Science.D'AT3 in 1930 really but which year is older 1754 or 1930?Don't talk such stupid things again.
@@CivilRights8308 Again like I said We do not say someone is copying German tech whenever they build a jet... your logic is also moronic as he never built one.
Lockheed designed and built the next generation helicopter in the late 60's/early 70's. It is still better than anything flying now. The AH-56 Cheyenne. Politics and poor decision making combined with inter-service rivalry/bickering relegated it to the dustbin. Apparently, some things never change.
And here we are folks however many decades later still selling war equipment as if it's a necessary part of life without ever a single word about the well documented Damage caused to life & the environment with the environment coming out the looser every time ... WE REALLY DO NEED TO END THIS FOR PROFIT INDUSTRY ...forever.
I learned that the co-axial rotor configuration eliminates the need for a tail rotor; reducing drag and improving speed and maneuverability. You will too because they say it 3 TIMES in the video. Stellar editing.
most likely A.I. generated content :))
Worth repeating...again....and again 😊 literally lol
It's funny how they say it while showing images of the helicopter where you can clearly see it actually does have a tail rotor, but for a completely different purpose. Someone that isn't that much into helicopters will get very confused.
Cut, copy, paste & repeat script. Thank Goodness for robo-voiced narration! 🙄
I read your comment prior to watching the video and started laughing very hard at the third time the guy mentions it...
MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL N BEAUTIFUL
Helicopter tangguh, sangar dan kuat menakjubkan
High teknologi with soaxial mode design and
High Speed 🎉❤
Finally VTOL that makes sense
USA best military technology on the planet.
Do obrony flanki wschodniej w Europie.(PL)
Bravo, US Force!
The strength and hugeness are apparent from her external appearance, and she will undoubtedly be very strong and intelligent, and she is the creation of great America. 🇺🇲👍💯
Kamov
USA The Undisputed Mighty Nation Good Job Bravooooooooooooos
Man that Raider looks stunning even without knowing its specs...
they canceled it and the canceled the 360 bell invectus
@@PhoneRepairs-m2n They'll still use all the technology gained from it into the reason this was cancelled. Helicopter drones using all this technology while the pilot is in a control helicopter meant to sit back in a safe position while orchestrating attacks from there. It's the same decision they made with the NGAD fighter program in which they can't go fully automated so they compromise with a mix of both. Either way this is much safer for pilots and we can expect fatalities to be incredibly reduced in war for pilots.
Once i saw an American helicopter flying upside down, I've been convinced the American military thinks of everything
The Apache! A friend of mine working at the test field near Mesa Arizona also saw same
Flying inverted counts ONLY in the northern hemisphere, as everything and everyone is "upside down" down under....
That's why Aussies are so difficult to understand. Keewies, on the other hand, are just quaint anachronisms from the 1950s!!
@@Omar-kk9fp lmao! Nice
Yes, but only on a flat earth😊.@@Omar-kk9fp
Tuyệt Đỉnh Lắm Chất Lượng Cao 🎉❤❤
The US is almost financially broke; how can they afford such an expensive heli?
HAHAHAHAHAHA good joke.
Both V-280 and S-97 are great for Army’s QRF for time sensitive missions
Americas freedom is not cheap, there is a cost to it. In money, are technology is the best in the world. A cost of lives defending are freedoms. The worst thing a person can do, is betray their country. That gave us the freedom , and opportunity in this country.
انتم لا تملكون الحرية في بلادكم
أتحداك ان تشتم اسرائيل او تعادي اسلامية
سوف يتم طردك من عملك وتسجن
very good for that encouragement and spirit of improvement, America has to be great again, it cannot be that the Chinese and the Russians are far above in terms of science, technology and academia, than the Americans
These new generation helicopters create thousands of high paying American jobs for at least 2 decades. The Blackhawk and Apache have been in service almost 50 years, it’s time to replace both.
Cool new helicopters. Interesting video. Thank you! 😊😊😊❤❤❤
I like this idea. Make engineering sense.
The helicopter technologies ia old system because when there is heavy wind the helicopter fan is meaning less .the wind crash the helicopter .
Why not create how to create heavy wind to wipe out .From front sides and downside and above the helicopter or upper part and back side .
This is silly common sense .
How the helicopter crash because of wind heavy .the heavy wind create problems.
So you will helicopter technologies to wipe out the heavy wind from all angles .then you can stable the helicopter .
The atmosphere is wind to wipe out heavy wind
muy bien por ese animo y espíritu de superación, américa tiene que ser grande de nuevo, no puede ser que los chino y los rusos están muy por encima en cuanto a ciencia, tecnología y academia, que los estadounidenses
نعم نعم لفلسطين الحرة
كأنك تتكلم في واد لوحدك نحن بصدد المروحيات الأمريكية وانت تتكلم عن فلسطين أترك هذا الوهم ياأخي لكي ترتاح نفسيا وجسديا
@@محمدالعبادي-ظ9خ شكرا وان اقلك انت وأهم لولا رعب المقاومة في فلسطين ولبنان وسوريا والعراق وايران لم ولن ترا سلاح واحد انصر لله ينصرك على عدوك الجبان داعش ومن لف لفهم أسرائيل وغيرهم من المندسين من الوهابية الله يصلحك للخير
Business for corporate America😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
A billions of tax dollars
The next generations helicopter will always belongs to MADE IN USA
Well they have to, because it looks like the Osprey is a widowmaker
On 5 December 2022, the US Army selected the rival Bell V-280 Valor as the winner of the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft program. Thus, cancelling the SB-1 Defiant.
the Army wanted their own Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey version for themselves, the contra-rotating blades I believe was invented in Russia.
Yeah, I think it was the Kamov soviet design bureau that first did the contra-rotating props. @@Mutlap
280 indeed win, and now it's another competition between the X-Raider and the 360 for Future Attack Recon Aircraft (FARA) which should see prototypes flying by 4Q24 because of the delays in receiving GE T901.
@@Mutlap No... the first one that flew was in France
انتضروا المفاجأه من مصنع كاموف الروسي ولتعلموا ايها الام ر ي ك ان كل اسلحتكم افكارهامسروقه وليس لديكم تطور يحسب لكم فلا تسعدوا ولا تفخروا كثيراً تبقى روسيا 🇷🇺 المهيمنه على الفضاء الجوي وما هذه إلا حديد مهلهل
US military helicopters are integral to a wide range of missions, serving critical roles in combat support, troop transport, logistics, medical evacuation, and special operations. Key models include the UH-60 Black Hawk, renowned for its heavy-lift capability and versatility in roles like battlefield support and air assault. The AH-64 Apache stands out as the primary attack helicopter, equipped with advanced weaponry for engaging ground and naval targets with precision. The CH-47 Chinook excels in heavy-lift transport, capable of carrying substantial cargo and personnel for logistical support and emergency operations. The UH-1 Huey, famous for its historical significance, remains a stalwart in transport, medevac, and reconnaissance missions. Lastly, the MV-22 Osprey combines vertical takeoff and landing capability with fixed-wing flight, serving rapid deployment and specialized missions. These helicopters collectively enhance US military readiness and effectiveness across diverse operational scenarios.
incredible helicopter
Informative good and Nice 👍
Unless you know something the rest of us don't, this helicopter got canceled for the US military.
If anything in my opinion can replace Blackhawk than it should be Defiant not Valor. Long-range Raider if able to carry all the weapons of apache then it could replace both Blackhawk and apache in the future. Awesome 👍
Defiant was outclassed in nearly every metric by the Valor... Not to mention the Defiant had a major crash of one of its prototypes delaying it 18 months.
The V280 is going to have about twice the range of the MH-60, which will be pretty important for the Pacific.
The range alone is absolutely game changing. The increased speed is also amazing.
Is it as survivable as the Black Hawk from small arms fire?
Hopefully vastly improved. Blackhawk's survivability from ground fire hasn't ever been the greatest... Far more vulnerable than Russian Mi-24 or the like. @@allen480
@@allen480If it is for the military, which it is, they are thinking about it. Also, there is a shaft connecting the two props, and two motors.
@@allen480 No transport helicopter is armored... It will be as survivable if not more as it can be made up of newer composite materials.
Meanwhile, Russia rolls out their new paper tigers motivating the US Military Complex to skip to the next Generation while Russia factually rolls back to the end of the WWII.
What makes you think they're going that contemporary......slow down boss....end of WWII......kinda "rushing" things a bit ain't ya'!?.....see that sexy Maxim they rolled out in the TRENCH.....
Не надейтесь
The US is upgrading because of the challenges and opportunities offered by the vast Pacific Theatre rather than Russia's paper tigers. China offers a far greater threat if war breaks out.
Ha ha ha
I dont think we're actually worried about China. War is bad for business. @aymonfoxc1442
Di youtube ada motor yg di gerakan oleh baling2 yg di putar oleh mesin.
Mesin itu tidak memutar rantai untuk menggerakan roda, akan tetapi bisa berlari dengan sangat cepat.
Artinya kalau di belakang helikopter ada baling2 yg menjadi pendorong agar bisa terbang dengan cepat itu wajar.
Air Wolf masih yang terbaik..... ❤
Interesting progresses !
Das wird noch der beste Hubschrauber der Welt werden !!!🙉👌✌️
Humans now ride flying objects that the gods used to ride in ancient times. Is man a god?
Need a decent editor to remove all the repetition - e.g. how many times was ‘coaxial counter rotating and pusher propellor’ repeated. Thanks for the video, but could be better
Three has been reported and confirmed by another!
good videos
Good vídeo
Very good at ❤❤❤❤❤🎉
The first 10 minutes could’ve been done in 45 seconds, I couldn’t go any longer!
Who needs schools and affordable housing when we can have new attack helicopters?
WOW what a big target with it's high twin rotor,
I've got a Popular Science magazine from the early '50's, showing something similar. It's been a long desired thing, airplane speed and rotary wing landing performance.
A billion is reducing cost wtf?!?!?!?
The old Comanche helicopter design may finally come to the Army.
Hllo Amerika 👍🏻👍🏻🇺🇸🇺🇸
Galing talqga ng us🇺🇸🇺🇸👍
India❤
Why does he keep saying the same thing over and over? We get it, it has axial contrarotating blades with no rear blade, reducing drag.
Written and voiced by AI is my guess
Because most people on this earth need a little longer to get it😮
WOW very cool
Excellent! Now when can I expect the check?
Super ideja!!
Helicopters are (almost) out. Drones and quadcopters will replace them.
no...
The huge "danger keep away" warning on the tail reminds me of the lawnmower sticker: "do not pick up and use as hedge trimmer"
2 Guys in Tacoma Washington did that in about 1978.. It didnt work well for them.
Imaginary but otherwise consistent with our litigious state.😂😂😂😂
Solche Kriegsgewalt verherrlichende Videos werden natürlich nicht gesperrt, sie sind ja voll im Interesse der Rüstungsindustrie!
Badass, say thanks fer the ole gyrocopter, utilizing the pusher propeller
The Army appears to have made a pitiful decision! Best of luck!
No, it was the right decision. Easy
YES YES YES YEEES 💕 💕 💕 💕 💕 💕 💕 💕
Super good machine 🎃
The New Helicopter for President's Trumps Return!!!+
Yes🎉🎉🎉🎉
Yes!!!!!!!!! Go Trump!!🎉
What a truly insane thing to say. It’s a video about helicopters, not traitors.
unfortunately this project has been terminated
Why are you posting videos with incorrect and out dated information?
A real version of Airwolf with super long rage(500 -1000 miles).
The Osprey is a good idea, but they need to review the whole project.
Q
The concept is fundamentally flawed.
So many idiots in these comments thinking they're smarter than the engineers who were actually on the Osprey project. Despite the fact that it has one of the lowest mishaps per flight hour of any other aviation platform in US military service.
They were testing that nearly 20 years ago!
It’s continuous. Brainiac.
before that actually, its a good video either way
Exactly. Also stealth helli Comnache came came to the audition 15 years ago. You see how far behind We are in what We know about army tech and what is in development. I bet what We do know is 20 to 25 years begind in what is in development.
Diferença de motores em ultra levs ustop e cada um no seu quê ah vinda não pôde planar 0:13 lee led,s jonh,s fiep 0:13 Skol Skil Twister 0:46
Impian dan ide dari film airwolf....
Die geben tolle Ziele für russische Raketen ab !
And the US Army ALWAYS chooses the Second Best Thing! 😒
The Army chose the V-280 (like a Mini Osprey), not this Boeing piece of 💩!
They realized that it was important that the Troops actually made it to the battlefield !
This thing Was a Russian Concept engineered in the 70's and repackaged by Boeing as New....
Secanggih apapun senjata dan alat perangmu gak ada apa apa nya kalau cuma untuk menghancurkan negara lain dan membunuh jutaan umat manusia di dunia yang gak bedosa.bukti masih kalah sama afganistan.ingat di atas langit masih ada langit.
Helikopter + 2 mesin jet kiri dan kanan bisa sampai 2 mach..... Mantap kan????
The Chinook helicopter was introduced in 1962 making it the oldest military helicopter that is in use by the Armed forces.
Script was too repetitive I heard the coaxial propeller description at least 4 times.
That's a hughy, my first flight was in a hughy. I was 10 years old. Best death machine I've ever been in
미군은 동축반전을 싫어한다.
대신 텐덤반전을 애용해 왔다.
텐덤반전은 동축반전의 장점을 가지고 있으면서 동시에 단점도 커버한다.
CH46, CH47이 텐덤반전이다.
동축반전은 복잡하고 유지운용도 어렵고 노출이 너무 커서 전술용으로 부적합하다.
한국공군이 수색 구조용으로 운용하고 있어 날라다니는걸 본 적이 있는데 명색이 구조용인데 나 여기 있다고 광고하고 다니고 있었다.
반면 UH60, AH64는 그에 비하면 정말 은밀히 기동한다.
큰 메인로타가 2개가 돌아가는데 노출이 안될 수가 있나?
민수용으로는 문제가 없다고 해도 군용으로는 부적합하다.
Yeah but Airwolf could run down a mig.
Nice ❤❤
I love 🇺🇸
للاسف الدقة والاناقة😊
Dual rotors are MUCH QUIETER. During the Vietnam War, the enemy called one "the silent death." The Uh-1s and Cobras were very loud, giving great advance notice to the enemy.
I don't see how the V280 beat out the Defiant X. I foresee many accidents.
It has nothing to do with which one is the best.
The Defiant had multiple technical issues along with a crash that delayed it 18 months... it was also outperformed by the Valor in nearly every metric.
Vry nic Video
This is the project they did not select!
This is a marketing video that would make Elon Musk proud. For example, the V-22 is now being defunded - pushed out. Not to say that 300+% in cost increases have anything do with it. Nor do ongoing crashes that have resulted in it earning the moniker of "The Widow Maker", Japan recently grounding all of their V-22s, it having the reliability of a 1970s Italian sports car, or that all three US military branches that currently fly it don't want any more of them. But at least it only cost $120M a copy and maintenance cost will continue to skyrocket.
Frequent references throughout the video to improved speed, range, efficiency, etc, but zero numbers or what any of that means. Pretty pictures though.
How cool it is !
The Defiant lost to the competition and is not adopted by the US Army.
Russia produces more aircraft every month then USA does in 2 years.
Russia produces more tanks in a month then USA has in 19 years
Russia produces enough ammunition and missiles as well as rocket's and drones to supply a 1 milllion man military in war right now.
Hi 🤗 please be so kindly and think also on rest of the world and keep Information also in Metric systems. Many thanks for Your understanding.
We don’t use the metric system in the US.
More taxes have to be collected and new machines can be tested.The homeless thank you, they are fine.
Not being a jerk here but most homeless people I've encountered have chosen this lifestyle and, for some odd reason, enjoy it. Weird right but true. Oh yeah, why didn't the homeless go into the military to avoid the homeless lifestyle? this, of course, isn't all homeless but many. Like the majority. When that homeless guy walks into a hospital, Ifrom drink or whatever that stay is very, very, very expensive.q7bgrand a night plus. Also they're are plenty of decent paying jobs that don't even need a face to face interview. Homeless John doe or Jane doe can easily go to a library or call you up, and they can go to ups or amazon and get a job in a warehouse as long as they have a good bg they get hires after answering like 10 questions. Show up for training.bam, that's it. There are jobs like tgis all over the country, so excuse me if I chuckle at that comment you made.
i heard the defiant wasnt chosen for the fvl program.
no matter how fast the helicopter flies, a rocket priced at $ 25,000 will destroy the helicopter and electronic interference will not prevent the device from being destroyed for $ 1000,000,000
Russia has already made this type of helicopter.What is unique about it?the only deference is that Russia's KA-52 Alligator is not stealthy.😂😂😂
... Coaxial helicopter have existed way before the KA-52. Not to mention that the tech used on the Defiant is new as it is a rigid rotor system instead of the normal flexible one. This allows the blade to be a lot closer together and has increased mobility.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 When did it exists and which country had this type coaxial helicopter?can you tell?
@@CivilRights8308 Corradino D'Ascanio Build the first flying coaxial helicopter in 1930 in France. Or the Bréguet-Dorand Gyroplane Laboratoire which was a more successful one of 1935 also in France. So again this tech has been in use for a while now and we do not say X country is copying German tech whenever they are building any jet.
@@n3v3rforgott3n9 Listen-the idea of coaxial rotors originates with Mikhail Lomonosov.He had developed a small helicopter model with coaxial rotors in July,1754 and demonstrated it to the Russian Academy of Science.D'AT3 in 1930 really but which year is older 1754 or 1930?Don't talk such stupid things again.
@@CivilRights8308 Again like I said We do not say someone is copying German tech whenever they build a jet... your logic is also moronic as he never built one.
Lockheed designed and built the next generation helicopter in the late 60's/early 70's. It is still better than anything flying now.
The AH-56 Cheyenne. Politics and poor decision making combined with inter-service rivalry/bickering relegated it to the dustbin.
Apparently, some things never change.
これで時速５００キロ程度は実現できるでしょう。スマートな機体で魅力的です。しかし搭乗や搭載が、実用的な条件に合う為に改善されるでしょう。
REPENT AND FOLLOW JESUS CHRIST BEFORE ITS TOO LATE 🔴
Ну никак Сикорский не может быть хуже Камовского Аллигатора.
And here we are folks however many decades later still selling war equipment as if it's a necessary part of life without ever a single word about the well documented Damage caused to life & the environment with the environment coming out the looser every time ... WE REALLY DO NEED TO END THIS FOR PROFIT INDUSTRY ...forever.
China and Russia would love that !