It's actually pretty likely that if Byzantium took hold of Indonesia, it would still be called Indonesia, as it's made from two Greek words, Indos meaning Indian and nesos meaning island (+the suffix -ia which means "the land of")
this is literally the best alternative timeline ever - no WW2 - byzantium survived - big hungary - big romania - big serbia - greeks in anatolia - constantinople stays the same
@@somerandomgoof no it's not, this alternative history is literally just roman larp. The thing that makes byzantine history so interesting is the countless times they were on the brink of collapse yet still pulled through. Slavs, Bulgars, Arabs, Turks, Persians, Italians, Lombards, all fighting them throughout their history yet they still pull through. This alternative history just Takes whats makes the romans so interesting and destroys it into "lets give romans powers given from God so they never face any real major setback" its boring
The great empire of the blank white background was soon beaten, and soon a new power, the blank greens took power, but the blank yellows rebelled in eastern Africa and southern Arabia.
Ironically byzantium could've survived if they got an alliance with the venetians. The last emperor of byzantium would've married the daughter of the doge but didn't because no one would want a venetian as queen
One little nitpick about the Levant. Seeing as it was under consistent Orthodox overlords since the late 1500s, plus the fact that many crusades were launched into the Levant, that would make the Levant heavily Orthodox, which would lend itself to complete Byzantine integration. The same wouldn't be for the Egyptians, who after having crusades plus rebels taking over the sultanate, would lead to Egypt becoming a Coptic stronghold. Copts hated the Orthodox, so vassalage or loose association would be preferable.
@@photon812 if you undecated dont push your uneducation to others please, Wallachia is the name other people called Romania, the romanians themselves called themselves rumani romani, romanians, the word is germanic and means just latin speker.
I loved this video, but i have some questions. How did the balkans achieve modern day alike borders whitout Byzantine intervention? Why is bosnia a emirate if the ottomans never arrived? Why does Russia have so much land in 1571? Why does romania even have that name? A realistic one may be Daco-Roma.
How did the invasion in 1708 succeed? There is such a great distance, advancing along the coast could mean an encirclement, and the byzantine position would mean it would have naval dominance, meaning no landing could cut off Constantinople. Even if something like that somehow happened, the city is defended, had massive grain storage, and an underground fresh water system prepared for siege. Let's also not discount the walls and Greek Fire the Byzantines had, which was only available to them. Coupled with modern canons, it could have turned into a deadly rain of fire, like a canon of fire. The most that would happe is a concession of Wallachia and Moldavia, with the new border being along the Danube River. I also find it hard to believe that an orthodox state like Russia (who saw the Byzantines as their parent state) would wage a war to tear apart the Byzantines, throwing them into a period of decline.
What's with all the empresses? I think the number of female rulers is unrealistic. And the Byzantines already had several emperors named "Alexios", which is basically the same as "Alexander".
@@loganvurklemeyer1957 an emirate is an Arab Muslim style of ruling. If the ottomans hadn’t arrived and brought Islam, Bosnia would’ve never been an emirate.
What is the Mediterranean like in this timeline? Seeing as the entire Eastern Med. is all Christan again, would this crusading spirit extend to the Western Med, with the Spanish Christianizing Morocco, the French Christianizing Algeria, and the Sicilians/Italians Christianizing Tunisia and Libya? Would this also in any way lead to some Chrisitan revival in Mesopotamia? The Nestorian Church of the East was dominant in most of Mesopotamia before the Islamic invasions. Finally, how would the Orthodox church operate in Indonesia? It is a massive community that would probably spread Orthodoxy to more of East Asia, and possible help the Syrian Church of Saint Thomas in Southern India (established before the adoption of Christianity in Rome). Would these lead to an increased influence of Syrian Orthodoxy in India, and an Orthodox maritime religion of East Asian traders to Japan and China?
is very beautiful as an alternative history ... but the Byzantine republic does not even make sense for an "alternative versionn" since the Eastern Roman Empire has always been an autocratic empire... At most it would become a constitutional monarchy with the emperor who has few powers. For a republic it would take a revolution and probably it would have included only Greece, Thrace and the Aegean coast in Anatolia
If you are greek, i recommend you search for Γιώργος Κοντογιωργης and what he has to say about the government type of Byzantion. If not then let me just say that Byzantium wasn't an autocracy, theocracy nor a feudalistic country. There are many logical arguments to be made here in support for this claim, all of which are based on sources of the time. I myself don't have the time for this "lecture" so i urge you to put some search on the topic.
Well, the Roman Empire didn't weakened, so, it won the Roman-parsian war in 7e century. Persia became christian, and the arabian tribes aren't able to gain and keep the middle east. So, no raise of islam, and the middle east stay greek and christian. The world would have been more peaceful.
@@utubrGaming If they subdued the Persians into being Peaceful with a status quo. The Romans could've built up the Armies to retake any lost western lands from the Lombards
First of all, The Eastern Roman Empire began its existence in 395 AD. Second of all, The creator chose a random date they wished to start the alternative story.
the end thing is dialects of Greek right? cause im pretty sure that the state would be 95-99% Greek with some armenian after all these years of holding on to anatolia and thrace
What do you think the Orthodox Church be like today? All 5 Patriarchates would be Christian, with Rome being Catholic, Constantinople and Antioch being Orthodox, Jerusalem being an Orthodox, with a Catholic minority from the Crusades, and Alexandria being Coptic. This would have large theological consequences, including for Islam. Jerusalem was considered the Third most holy city in Islam. With a strong Coptic presence in Egypt, Sudan would become Coptic again, as Ethiopia and Egypt could route the Sudanese. This might also lead to a collapse of the Somali Muslims in Ethiopia, and the loss of Harar, Islam's fourth most holy city.
i think the video isn't harsh enough on the byzantines , also it's unlikely poland ceding danzig would've ended the problems hitler would've just demanded no and the polish would decline and the germans would've declared war the napoleon thing in my opinion is dumb outright no explanation needed the WW1 treaty isn't harsh enough on the byzantines in the way that the puppets only get taken away which in my opinion is dumb af. heres what im my opinion would've happened islands on the mediterranean would've been taken by the british for strategical purposes crete , cyprus the ionian islands serbia would've possibly taken north macedonia , the entente could've possibly freed albania or bulgaria but if both haven been assimilated yet possibly. syria would've been taken by the french , also istanbul could be demilitarized allowing entente ships ig french navy to enter the black sea the byzantine navy would've been reduced heavily so the military and probally a leadership change.
I think that due to the minor loss after WW2 is due to the fact that they surrendered/made peace only in 1915, and that most syrian and balkan areas coudnt be taken due to the fact that a majority of it had become greek over time, which would lead to revolts if annexed by opposing powers. Also, I believe that they still lost a lot in the end, such as direct control of the Suez Canal, the major cities in the middle east, and all of their Indonesian and african colonies.
How exactly did Zoe III not get deposed following the defeat of the Central Powers? With Germany and Austria both becoming unstable republics, I'd expected the same to befall Byzantium.
The Entente wasn't exactly determined to abolish the monarchies in Europe, they mainly just wanted reparations and territory. The fall of monarchies in the area occured due to communist and democratic revolutions. It seems that due to the monarchy being constitutional here, and the empire had maintained a monarchy for centuries, they managed to prevent a revolution and recover.
why does bosnia become an emirate? without the ottoman conquest of the Balkans its impossible for that area to have become muslim? also how did Austria get Hungary? That also only happened bc of the ottomans
They remained in persia and ruled there. Some of the turks remained in central asia. The persian turks would eventually assimilate into the persian cultures. Some turks migrated to the borders of the roman empire. Though in much smaller numbers.
What makes you think that Byzantium was such an egalitarian empire that there would be a huge succession of female emperors? If such thing happened back in the day, all the powers around them would be invading like savages, seeing the Byzantines as weak. Just ask Maria Theresa of Austria how much acceptance she got, the instant the succeeded her father
Doubt if in real life there is such a parallel universe, that the conditions to form the UN would occur in this time line, it would remain the League of Nations.
23:12 HOLD UP! What the actual hell is going on. 1st of all, Russia is not NEARLY as powerful as that in 1571. 2nd of all, the Romans and Russians would be allies as the Russians were inspired by the Romans and they were both Orthodox and many cities in southern Ukraine had Greek names while under the Russian Empire.
And a couple other things too, like Venice not being a b@tch taking advantage of Byzantine friendship, and no 4th Crusade, and Byzantine win in Manzikert. But you could say that all those are caused by the strengthening they'd get from an easy victory against Bulgaria.
Minor fixes Bosnia wouldn’t be an emirate cause it couldn’t be Muslim Nationalism barely existed except religious nationalism before the 1810s It wouldn’t be called the Byzantine Republic as it still has a constitutional monarch Trebizond likely wouldn’t secede as it would definitely still be Greek Arabs would almost definitely be gone in all of Byzantium
I can't say the video wasn't fun, but it's the logical fallacies and the broken English that make it so, not the quality. For example, the "Emirate of Bosnia". How an a Christian country be an emirate? Or how is Bosnia Muslim without an Ottoman Empire? My favourite part is when the Byzantine Economy did drugs at 33:53 :)
I’m so sorry for the small and hard to read text. It’s the best i could do.
Yeah, I was just about to mention that, it’s not too bad, though
I Just don't get why only Balkan and today Turkey ? Why wouldn't they expend to whole europe as well xd
My god so unrealistic
Can I ask a question??
I understand .
It's actually pretty likely that if Byzantium took hold of Indonesia, it would still be called Indonesia, as it's made from two Greek words, Indos meaning Indian and nesos meaning island (+the suffix -ia which means "the land of")
Cool trivia!
I’m 30 seconds in... and this is one of the top comments... what the fuck have I gotten myself to watch
Agreed
@Sylwaindsm we do, it's taught in school in Indonesia lol
@Sylwaindsm get rekt
Nicely done! It must have been hard to find about the leaders after 1453, Constantine the IA'. Very cool job!
this is literally the best alternative timeline ever
- no WW2
- byzantium survived
- big hungary
- big romania
- big serbia
- greeks in anatolia
- constantinople stays the same
@علي همام kebab removed
@TheMorallySuperior nah its the best
@@somerandomgoof no it's not, this alternative history is literally just roman larp. The thing that makes byzantine history so interesting is the countless times they were on the brink of collapse yet still pulled through. Slavs, Bulgars, Arabs, Turks, Persians, Italians, Lombards, all fighting them throughout their history yet they still pull through. This alternative history just Takes whats makes the romans so interesting and destroys it into "lets give romans powers given from God so they never face any real major setback" its boring
@@ninjacat8659 yea its kinda like that
I just realized after watching it again and uhhrmmm
reading your comment
The great empire of the blank white background was soon beaten, and soon a new power, the blank greens took power, but the blank yellows rebelled in eastern Africa and southern Arabia.
17:43 cursed Byzantine-Venetian alliance
Ironically byzantium could've survived if they got an alliance with the venetians. The last emperor of byzantium would've married the daughter of the doge but didn't because no one would want a venetian as queen
Imagine how how wealthy Byzantium would be with the Levant AND Indonesia
Just see the empire Before the Islamic invasion but way richet
Fr
One little nitpick about the Levant. Seeing as it was under consistent Orthodox overlords since the late 1500s, plus the fact that many crusades were launched into the Levant, that would make the Levant heavily Orthodox, which would lend itself to complete Byzantine integration.
The same wouldn't be for the Egyptians, who after having crusades plus rebels taking over the sultanate, would lead to Egypt becoming a Coptic stronghold. Copts hated the Orthodox, so vassalage or loose association would be preferable.
How bosnia become a emirate If ottomans never arrived?
magic
Trade effect same like Indonesia why they became majority
simply,maybe byazntine exiled muslim minorites there
@@bankruptmapping3919 The religious, political, social, economic, and geographical factors are so vastly different that it's essentially impossible.
Yeah, I was going to ask the same thing
27:11 Roman intervention in Romania
Isn't the name of Romania came after the fall of Byzantium?
@@ghostlion8616 No. Romania is a modern name. It was still called Wallachia.
@@photon812 if you undecated dont push your uneducation to others please, Wallachia is the name other people called Romania, the romanians themselves called themselves rumani romani, romanians, the word is germanic and means just latin speker.
@@tomytoma6287 It was internationally known as Wallachia and Moldova. Romania was named in the second half of the 19th century.
The Romans called themselves romania ironic since Romania means land of romand
I loved this video, but i have some questions. How did the balkans achieve modern day alike borders whitout Byzantine intervention? Why is bosnia a emirate if the ottomans never arrived? Why does Russia have so much land in 1571? Why does romania even have that name? A realistic one may be Daco-Roma.
Byzantium = Bulgaria. 1 ppl = 2 empire. In the 21st century, they still don't understand who the Byzantines are :)
Dacia or Wallachia would probably be more realistic
@@СтрацимирИванов-ю4к what do you mean by Byzantine = Bulgaria?
How did the invasion in 1708 succeed? There is such a great distance, advancing along the coast could mean an encirclement, and the byzantine position would mean it would have naval dominance, meaning no landing could cut off Constantinople. Even if something like that somehow happened, the city is defended, had massive grain storage, and an underground fresh water system prepared for siege. Let's also not discount the walls and Greek Fire the Byzantines had, which was only available to them. Coupled with modern canons, it could have turned into a deadly rain of fire, like a canon of fire. The most that would happe is a concession of Wallachia and Moldavia, with the new border being along the Danube River. I also find it hard to believe that an orthodox state like Russia (who saw the Byzantines as their parent state) would wage a war to tear apart the Byzantines, throwing them into a period of decline.
What's with all the empresses? I think the number of female rulers is unrealistic. And the Byzantines already had several emperors named "Alexios", which is basically the same as "Alexander".
I couldn’t find any good male poetraits. Only female
There was a emperor named Alexander though, so it's possible
That was great you put a lot of time and effort into it
What alternate history should i do?
Poland?
Lithuania?
*Commonwealth*
Japan
Britain maybe?
Great video, but just one problem. Bosnia would’ve never been an emirate if the ottomans hadn’t existed.
pixar?
@@loganvurklemeyer1957 an emirate is an Arab Muslim style of ruling. If the ottomans hadn’t arrived and brought Islam, Bosnia would’ve never been an emirate.
Best alternate timeline. :)
Majority religion on Indonesia in this timeline is Greek Orthodox
My alternate history of Eastern Rome was them becoming the new Greeko-Slavic superpower in EU4.
Amazing man, I love it!
All history of this video changed after the roman victory against Seljuk Turks in matzikert...
You seem to think that medieval nations would have relations like nations do today, which is plain wrong
Strange John komnenoi or Manuel never did any grand conquests massively expanding the borders
I noticed how it paused for a bit in 1453
At the end where it showed the demographics I was like "woah woah what the hell happened a massive civil war or something?"
What is the Mediterranean like in this timeline? Seeing as the entire Eastern Med. is all Christan again, would this crusading spirit extend to the Western Med, with the Spanish Christianizing Morocco, the French Christianizing Algeria, and the Sicilians/Italians Christianizing Tunisia and Libya?
Would this also in any way lead to some Chrisitan revival in Mesopotamia? The Nestorian Church of the East was dominant in most of Mesopotamia before the Islamic invasions.
Finally, how would the Orthodox church operate in Indonesia? It is a massive community that would probably spread Orthodoxy to more of East Asia, and possible help the Syrian Church of Saint Thomas in Southern India (established before the adoption of Christianity in Rome). Would these lead to an increased influence of Syrian Orthodoxy in India, and an Orthodox maritime religion of East Asian traders to Japan and China?
Not possible most of Europe wouldn’t be able to hold North Africa in real time they kicked them out in the 1500s or 1400s
is very beautiful as an alternative history ... but the Byzantine republic does not even make sense for an "alternative versionn" since the Eastern Roman Empire has always been an autocratic empire... At most it would become a constitutional monarchy with the emperor who has few powers. For a republic it would take a revolution and probably it would have included only Greece, Thrace and the Aegean coast in Anatolia
If you are greek, i recommend you search for Γιώργος Κοντογιωργης and what he has to say about the government type of Byzantion. If not then let me just say that Byzantium wasn't an autocracy, theocracy nor a feudalistic country. There are many logical arguments to be made here in support for this claim, all of which are based on sources of the time. I myself don't have the time for this "lecture" so i urge you to put some search on the topic.
think of it as roman republic
☦️🇷🇺❤️🇬🇷☦️💪🏻
Нет войны между Грецией и Россией
☦️🇬🇷❤️🇷🇺☦️
Όχι Πόλεμος ανάμεσα σε Ελλάδα και Ρωσία
You need to make a tutorial on how you make ur vids
These borders are kind of clunky and don't make sense, I would recommend you use a province map. For example why is the Moldavia border like that?
Because borders were and still are quite often "clunky" and the world does not use a province map.
RIght, now do an alternate history of Eastern Rome if the Plague of Justinian never hit.
Well, the Roman Empire didn't weakened, so, it won the Roman-parsian war in 7e century. Persia became christian, and the arabian tribes aren't able to gain and keep the middle east. So, no raise of islam, and the middle east stay greek and christian.
The world would have been more peaceful.
@@jeanaymart130 and how does the West fair?
@@utubrGaming If they subdued the Persians into being Peaceful with a status quo. The Romans could've built up the Armies to retake any lost western lands from the Lombards
This is beautiful
Even in this timeline the elites ravaged the greeks its as sad as it is expected
21:30 Emilia I Julius will probably be called Elizabeth I of the Eastern World in modern times.
What song starts at 27:31? Listened to all the music listed and I couldn't find it
Fall of constantinople. Its a greek song.
“Anna dies from wounds caused by war.” Is this implying that she was actively fighting on the ground with lifelong adult male soldiers?
Maybe she was like Joan of Arc.
The Eastern Roman Empire starts from 330 AD not in 899AD.
First of all, The Eastern Roman Empire began its existence in 395 AD.
Second of all, The creator chose a random date they wished to start the alternative story.
Thank you for not using the term... Byzantine I’m the title (scrubs steel wool on my tongue for uttering that heretical word)
Byzantines wouldn’t be called a republic if they still have a monarch!
How did you get the pictures for the modern rulers (the black and white ones during and after ww1 to be specific)
I searched on pintrest for black and white medeterrainean photos and selected the best ones
@@wintermapping6588 oh ok
Challenge: take a shot every time the emperors wife dies from childbirth
20:15 - Let's Skip to what is really important
Interesting. I have one question. Since WW2 didn't happen here, did the Cold War also happen?
the end thing is dialects of Greek right? cause im pretty sure that the state would be 95-99% Greek with some armenian after all these years of holding on to anatolia and thrace
Yeah, they’re dialects
Constantinople will be restore I saw u in full life stream of history of the ottoman empire ur a hero Byzantine nationalist
It would call itself the Republic of Rome or Roman Republic as it never saw itself as anything else.
I would have imagined, XIX century's emperors wearing a purple fez.
why would they move capital to imrpovise defences? in time of peace? why. the small adrianople wasn't better defended?
How did you find the successors did you make them up or were there real people that were named all of that.
Lovely job
its bruh moment when napoleon gets executed in adrianople
Pretty sure Byzantium wouldn't take all of crimea, the Kievan Rus only owned Kerch in the first place.
alt title: what if the 4th crusade never raided Constantinople
What do you think the Orthodox Church be like today? All 5 Patriarchates would be Christian, with Rome being Catholic, Constantinople and Antioch being Orthodox, Jerusalem being an Orthodox, with a Catholic minority from the Crusades, and Alexandria being Coptic. This would have large theological consequences, including for Islam. Jerusalem was considered the Third most holy city in Islam. With a strong Coptic presence in Egypt, Sudan would become Coptic again, as Ethiopia and Egypt could route the Sudanese. This might also lead to a collapse of the Somali Muslims in Ethiopia, and the loss of Harar, Islam's fourth most holy city.
Harar aren't fourth most holy City to Muslim
i think the video isn't harsh enough on the byzantines , also it's unlikely poland ceding danzig would've ended the problems hitler would've just demanded no and the polish would decline and the germans would've declared war
the napoleon thing in my opinion is dumb outright no explanation needed
the WW1 treaty isn't harsh enough on the byzantines in the way that the puppets only get taken away which in my opinion is dumb af.
heres what im my opinion would've happened
islands on the mediterranean would've been taken by the british for strategical purposes crete , cyprus the ionian islands
serbia would've possibly taken north macedonia , the entente could've possibly freed albania or bulgaria but if both haven been assimilated yet possibly.
syria would've been taken by the french ,
also istanbul could be demilitarized allowing entente ships ig french navy to enter the black sea
the byzantine navy would've been reduced heavily so the military and probally a leadership change.
I think that due to the minor loss after WW2 is due to the fact that they surrendered/made peace only in 1915, and that most syrian and balkan areas coudnt be taken due to the fact that a majority of it had become greek over time, which would lead to revolts if annexed by opposing powers. Also, I believe that they still lost a lot in the end, such as direct control of the Suez Canal, the major cities in the middle east, and all of their Indonesian and african colonies.
Video at 34:39 : "Hellenic Greek"
Buzz Lightyear: "Hmm Yes the Floor Here Is Made Out of Floor"
I was going by regions
F to Napoleon. He tried
How exactly did Zoe III not get deposed following the defeat of the Central Powers? With Germany and Austria both becoming unstable republics, I'd expected the same to befall Byzantium.
The Entente wasn't exactly determined to abolish the monarchies in Europe, they mainly just wanted reparations and territory. The fall of monarchies in the area occured due to communist and democratic revolutions. It seems that due to the monarchy being constitutional here, and the empire had maintained a monarchy for centuries, they managed to prevent a revolution and recover.
why does bosnia become an emirate? without the ottoman conquest of the Balkans its impossible for that area to have become muslim?
also how did Austria get Hungary? That also only happened bc of the ottomans
Considerate very much the independence feel in the XIX Century, barbare
When turks came on anatolia tho?
They remained in persia and ruled there. Some of the turks remained in central asia. The persian turks would eventually assimilate into the persian cultures. Some turks migrated to the borders of the roman empire. Though in much smaller numbers.
Fantastic
What makes you think that Byzantium was such an egalitarian empire that there would be a huge succession of female emperors? If such thing happened back in the day, all the powers around them would be invading like savages, seeing the Byzantines as weak. Just ask Maria Theresa of Austria how much acceptance she got, the instant the succeeded her father
Because women had considerable influence in Eastern Roman court.
this is pretty much if the byzantine and ottoman empires merged their history together
Any idea of the name of the song that starts around 27:31?
ua-cam.com/video/6gar6MONCKs/v-deo.html
You will come as a lightning
sup Soft! its Leopold!
Found u :))
Song name in 6:58?
Hi
Hi!
What if they won ww1 though
At the end you call it the Byzantine Republic, yet it has Emperors/Empresses???
good video.
Thanks
@@wintermapping6588 np
John ο Γεώργιος ο Παλαιολόγος🤣🤣🤣this may be bad but it's to fanny for Greeks like me
Most realistic alt medieval Rome so far
Doubt if in real life there is such a parallel universe, that the conditions to form the UN would occur in this time line, it would remain the League of Nations.
What is the song at the very end? The one in Latin?
Because I really like it
Greek anthem
Very nice gj
Why would Serbia be invaded by the Romans. I get it's alt history but it doesn't make sense.
How it should have ended.
23:12 HOLD UP! What the actual hell is going on. 1st of all, Russia is not NEARLY as powerful as that in 1571. 2nd of all, the Romans and Russians would be allies as the Russians were inspired by the Romans and they were both Orthodox and many cities in southern Ukraine had Greek names while under the Russian Empire.
So basically what if Simeon the great of Bulgaria never existed
Basically yeah
And a couple other things too, like Venice not being a b@tch taking advantage of Byzantine friendship, and no 4th Crusade, and Byzantine win in Manzikert. But you could say that all those are caused by the strengthening they'd get from an easy victory against Bulgaria.
Nice
Thanks! Do Ukraine next!
Great!
what happened to albanians?
Minor fixes
Bosnia wouldn’t be an emirate cause it couldn’t be Muslim
Nationalism barely existed except religious nationalism before the 1810s
It wouldn’t be called the Byzantine Republic as it still has a constitutional monarch
Trebizond likely wouldn’t secede as it would definitely still be Greek
Arabs would almost definitely be gone in all of Byzantium
Anyone knows what music is it that begins at 27:30?
Seatch “fall of Constantinople song” you will find it there!
@@wintermapping6588 Thank you!! Beautiful melody and great video, btw
You will come as a lightning by Stamatis Spanoudakis
Oh yay, you acomplished nothing but a partially relevant Eastern Rome. *SIGH*
Alternate history of the Navajos
Oh I wish
WoW
24:43 Hmm imagine indonesian but with a mix of roman/greek alcurturation
Bayangkan indonesia tapi ada alkurturasi romawi/yunani
VIVA ROMA AND HELLAS!
Dreamer.
Turks watching this be like😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬😡😡
orthodox indonesia LETS GOOOOO
I can't say the video wasn't fun, but it's the logical fallacies and the broken English that make it so, not the quality. For example, the "Emirate of Bosnia". How an a Christian country be an emirate? Or how is Bosnia Muslim without an Ottoman Empire? My favourite part is when the Byzantine Economy did drugs at 33:53 :)
how the UN exist if wwii didnt happened
The Byzantine empire was destroyed by Turks in 1453(I'm Greek and I know about this.
Roma Invicta
AN INTERESTING FAIRY TALE FOR YOUNG CHILDREN .. 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
woah nice video! i am dutch mapper and i have discord if u have discord too i would love to contact you. its Dutch Mapper#6169
nice 69/69