All these people are all like “I have to memorize this in an hour!” I Have two days and I’m freaking out! I have to take a verbal test for the nicene creed, and I feel like a guilty catholic for not knowing it.
Who's forcing you to memorize the creed in two days. Relax what matters is your devotion to God and his body the Holy Catholic church. I wish u luck on your exam and God's guidance in your life
Nooookbsusjkwjs I have to memorize this for today in 3hours 😭 plz let catechism be cancelled! YEHEJWUERRHRFH NOOOOO WAAAAA PFFFT A BUG JUST FLEW INTO MY SISTER'S RUDE MOUTHDGSJSKDHD
That's great to hear! You hit the nail on the head which explains why we published this video in the first place. I had a shorter version of this up which was just one pass through the creed, but people liked it so much and were using it for a study aide, that I got requests to produce it in a loop for study purposes. Glad you found it to be useful!
I recorded a short version of this video a couple years ago, but so many people requested a version for study and memorization purposes that I decided to publish this longer version. I hope it helped you out.
I just returned the Catholic Church after over 50 yrs. I miss the Latin Mass and the older Apostles Creed. But I can see the relevance of using language that our neighbors use. I would rather have Latin Mass with English translation written out. Not easy to find Latin Mass.
Thanks Kylee Verdugo for requesting a longer version of the NEW NICENE CREED for Study and Memorization purposes. Are you studying for a theology class and need extra help with memorizing the New Nicene Creed? At the request of Kylee, we just posted this longer version of the creed. It replays 15 times, with a 15 second pause in between with the entire text on the screen during the pause. You have the option of playing it through, or pausing it each time and reading the entire text yourself. I hope this helps you! God Bless!
"Amen and amen I also have this in our own language/dialect" in my specific place of the country. but of this english universal version is aswell very powerful these age and times.🙏🙇🙏.
Bubonic 27 as you read it cover all the words except the first and see how far you can get. Do this for each line. Reveal more words if needed but eventually try to get one. Then you can even reveal just the first letter of each line.
Write it out longhand in your own handwriting on a long piece of paper. Then write a 3 x 5 card for each paragraph or section and work with that. Also - using smaller cards, write it out one line on each card, numbering your cards so you can keep them in order as you go through them. Writing (or printing as you prefer) with a pen or pencil on paper will use a different part of your brain than typing the Creed, listening and reading. This is old school but it works. Go through the cards one by one and see what you remember. I realize this is a bit late for the OP, but maybe it will help someone else at some time.
Join the club - I have a strong start and big finish but unfortunately find myself mumbling in the middle trying to sound like I know exactly what I’m supposed to say. Sigh. I’m going to learn this - that’s my intention
Oh I prefer the old one and after saying it for thirty years I don't think I can relearn this. I don't understand why it needed to be changed. The parts that have changed seem to just be a rephrasing, but who am I to question the reasoning for the change. Thanks for posting it though! God Bless
I made this video to be used as a memorization tool. It seems to have helped a lot of people. I'm a visual person, so scrolling text was a must, and the narration adds to storing it to memory. I used it to memorize the creed myself, and I find myself actually "hearing" the video when I've recited it since.
Thank you so much I had to memorize this for school and I was so stressed out because I didn’t know it.But this really helped me so much Thank You so much. (Kind comment)
thank you so much for posting this, I always have to read it now, whereas before I could recite it. This was very very nice, thankyou! I like how you do a bit of everything ;)
I do wish you spoke just slightly slower. This is wonderful at helping, but if it was a little slower it would give time to commit the words in my head, rather than just recite/read at the faster pace
See what I like about this is one thing. It's backed up by the Bible. It just utterly abolishes Mormonism and proves it to be a corrupt heresy like it is
No, this is the Apostles' Creed (It's a lot shorter than the Nicene Creed): I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into Hell. On the third day, He rose again from the dead. He ascended into Heaven, and is seated at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty. From there, He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting. Amen.
I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages. God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father; through him all things were made. For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets. I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.
From Wikipedia: Filioque (Ecclesiastical Latin: [filiˈɔkwe]) is a Latin term added to the original Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (commonly known as the Nicene Creed), and which has been the subject of great controversy between Eastern and Western Christianity. The Latin term Filioque describes the Holy Spirit in Christianity as proceeding from both the Father and the Son, (and not from the Father only). In the Nicene Creed it is translated by the English phrase "and [from] the Son": I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father ⟨and the Son⟩. Who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified. or in Latin: Et in Spiritum Sanctum, Dominium et vivificantem: qui ex Patre ⟨Filioque⟩ procedit Qui cum Patre, et Filio simul adoratur. et cum glorificatur Whether that term Filioque is included, as well as how it is translated and understood, can have important implications for how one understands the central Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. For some, the term implies a serious underestimation of the Father's role in the Trinity; for others, denial of what it expresses implies a serious underestimation of the role of the Son in the Trinity. Over time, the term became a symbol of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, although there have been attempts at resolving the conflict. Among the early attempts at harmonization are the works of Maximus the Confessor, who notably was canonised independently by both Eastern and Western churches. The Filioque is included in the form of the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed used in most Western Christian churches, first appearing in the 6th century.[contradictory] It was accepted by the popes only in 1014 and is rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Churches and Church of the East. It is not in the original text of this Creed, attributed to the second ecumenical council, Constantinople I (381), which says that the Holy Spirit proceeds "from the Father", without additions of any kind, such as "and the Son" or "alone"] the Latin text now in use in most Western Churches speaks of the Holy Spirit as proceeding "from the Father and the Son". Differences over this doctrine and the question of papal primacy have been and remain primary causes of schism between the Eastern Orthodox and Western churches. The term has been an ongoing source of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, contributing, in major part, to the East-West Schism of 1054 and proving to be an obstacle to attempts to reunify the two sides. Although the disagreement about the doctrine preceded the disagreement about the insertion into the creed, the two disagreements became linked to the third when the pope approved insertion of the term into the NCC in the 11th century. Siecienski writes that "Ultimately what was at stake was not only God's trinitarian nature, but also the nature of the Church, its teaching authority and the distribution of power among its leaders." Hubert Cunliffe-Jones identifies two opposing Eastern Orthodox opinions about the Filioque: a "liberal" view and a "rigorist" view. The "liberal" view sees the controversy as being largely a matter of mutual miscommunication and misunderstanding. In this view, both East and West are at fault for failing to allow for a "plurality of theologies". Each side went astray in considering their theological framework as the only one that was doctrinally valid and applicable. Thus, neither side would accept that the dispute was not so much about conflicting dogmas as it was about different theologoumena or theological perspectives. While all Christians must be in agreement on questions of dogma, there is room for diversity in theological approaches. However, this "liberal" view is vehemently opposed by those Eastern Orthodox whom Cunliffe-Jones identifies as holding a "rigorist" view. According to standard Eastern Orthodox position, as pronounced by Photius, Mark of Ephesus and 20th century Orthodox theologians such as Vladimir Lossky, the Filioque question hinges on fundamental issues of dogma and cannot be dismissed as simply one of different theologoumena. Many in the "rigorist" camp consider the Filioque to have resulted in the role of the Holy Spirit being underestimated by the Western Church and thus leading to serious doctrinal error. In a similar vein, Siecienski comments that, although it was common in the 20th century to view the Filioque as just another weapon in the power struggle between Rome and Constantinople and although this was occasionally the case, for many involved in the dispute, the theological issues outweighed by far the ecclesiological concerns. According to Siecienski, the deeper question was perhaps whether Eastern and Western Christianity had wound up developing "differing and ultimately incompatible teachings about the nature of God". Moreover, Siecienski asserts that the question of whether the teachings of East and West were truly incompatible became almost secondary to the fact that, starting around the 8th or 9th century, Christians on both sides of the dispute began to believe that the differences were irreconcilable. From the view of the West, the Eastern rejection of the Filioque denied the consubstantiality of the Father and the Son and was thus a form of crypto-Arianism. In the East, the interpolation of the Filioque seemed to many to be an indication that the West was teaching a "substantially different faith". Siecienski asserts that, as much as power and authority were central issues in the debate, the strength of emotion rising even to the level of hatred can be ascribed to a belief that the other side had "destroyed the purity of the faith and refused to accept the clear teachings of the fathers on the Spirit's procession" There's a lot more information available online of you care to search further.
Kevin Hunter I know what Wiki says, my question is why was it introduced at all? Originally it said that the Holy Spirit comes from the Father alone. Is it true that even some Roman bishops (the Popes) agreed with Arian "heretical" view of the Christ's nature centuries after Nicene council? Was that the reason the Western church introduced filioque term? To, so to speak, silence the opposition in their ranks?
No, it isn't. This is the Nicene Creed that's in accordance with the current/revised edition of the (i.e., The Third Edition) Roman Missal. This revision of the Roman Missal has been in effect since 2011, beginning with all Masses for the First Sunday of Advent (of course, including all Masses in anticipation of that Sunday).
@Drew Duffy If they're using the older version of the Nicene Creed (or any of the other parts in the Mass, for that matter), at Mass, then their Masses are illicit, at the very least.
joshua marquez It's always funny when someone makes a comment without an explanation, and then spells the word "wrong" wrong. It seems you might have at least taken the time to write your sentence correctly. "This is worng" is just wrong on a number of levels. Lol
I ask God to help me memorize this prayer, though i am a different religion, i will respect this prayer and will carry this prayer
All these people are all like “I have to memorize this in an hour!” I Have two days and I’m freaking out! I have to take a verbal test for the nicene creed, and I feel like a guilty catholic for not knowing it.
Natalie Herrera same here, but I got one day
Who's forcing you to memorize the creed in two days. Relax what matters is your devotion to God and his body the Holy Catholic church. I wish u luck on your exam and God's guidance in your life
Same
I have five days until my Confirmation, didn't realize I'd be standing before everyone saying it!
I’VE GOT TO MEMORIZE THIS TMR, GOD BLESS ME. DONT LET ME GO TO SCHOOL PLZ LET ME PASS
actuallly I can do it again but is uck
how did you do?
SAME BRO
Nooookbsusjkwjs I have to memorize this for today in 3hours 😭 plz let catechism be cancelled! YEHEJWUERRHRFH NOOOOO WAAAAA PFFFT A BUG JUST FLEW INTO MY SISTER'S RUDE MOUTHDGSJSKDHD
Same
How did u do!!
Thanks! Peace Be With You.
THANK YOU NOW I WON’T FAIL MY QUIZ!
That's great to hear! You hit the nail on the head which explains why we published this video in the first place. I had a shorter version of this up which was just one pass through the creed, but people liked it so much and were using it for a study aide, that I got requests to produce it in a loop for study purposes. Glad you found it to be useful!
I have to learn this prayer today
I recorded a short version of this video a couple years ago, but so many people requested a version for study and memorization purposes that I decided to publish this longer version. I hope it helped you out.
mary Quintana same
mary Quintana same
Also same
I’m going to church and have to memories this soo much help meh .-.
I'm not even Catholic but Christian, yet I go to a Catholic school, so I have to memorize this, I don't know how I'm going to do it.
Don't eat me same here, I have a test tomorrow
@@darthironamerican good luck, I got -1 on mine for switching one thing up.
Don't eat me thanks, I took the test today, hope I did well
I have to memorize this for my confirmation. Thank you so much!
I just returned the Catholic Church after over 50 yrs. I miss the Latin Mass and the older Apostles Creed. But I can see the relevance of using language that our neighbors use.
I would rather have Latin Mass with English translation written out. Not easy to find Latin Mass.
Thanks Kylee Verdugo for requesting a longer version of the NEW NICENE CREED for Study and Memorization purposes. Are you studying for a theology class and need extra help with memorizing the New Nicene Creed? At the request of Kylee, we just posted this longer version of the creed. It replays 15 times, with a 15 second pause in between with the entire text on the screen during the pause. You have the option of playing it through, or pausing it each time and reading the entire text yourself. I hope this helps you! God Bless!
Nice video Kevin Hunter
nice video Kevin Hunter
Thanks is helping to both my son and myself to memorize it
"Amen and amen I also have this in our own language/dialect" in my specific place of the country. but of this english universal version is aswell very powerful these age and times.🙏🙇🙏.
Thank you God to inspire you. May God bless you
Peace be with you!
and with your spirit :)
Thank you very much, It really help me a lot for my test tomorrow
Do you have any suggestions for helping memorize this faster? I feel like personally reading or listening to prayers don't help me memorize them.
Bubonic 27 as you read it cover all the words except the first and see how far you can get. Do this for each line. Reveal more words if needed but eventually try to get one. Then you can even reveal just the first letter of each line.
X1.25
Write it out longhand in your own handwriting on a long piece of paper. Then write a 3 x 5 card for each paragraph or section and work with that. Also - using smaller cards, write it out one line on each card, numbering your cards so you can keep them in order as you go through them. Writing (or printing as you prefer) with a pen or pencil on paper will use a different part of your brain than typing the Creed, listening and reading. This is old school but it works. Go through the cards one by one and see what you remember. I realize this is a bit late for the OP, but maybe it will help someone else at some time.
write it out multiple times, and keep writing it and reciting it until youve memorized it, write it on paper, dont type it
Thank u so much!! I know this Prayer, but I just love to listen to it just before I go to bed
Join the club - I have a strong start and big finish but unfortunately find myself mumbling in the middle trying to sound like I know exactly what I’m supposed to say. Sigh.
I’m going to learn this - that’s my intention
Hi!!! I have to learn this by Christmas
Thanks.I have to remember this in 2 days for catechism to do my first communion. And I’m stressed.thanks for the help
i have to memorize this in 5 days but it’s so long so i’m starting now
thank you! i needed to memorize this for school and your guide was a huge help.
Oh I prefer the old one and after saying it for thirty years I don't think I can relearn this. I don't understand why it needed to be changed. The parts that have changed seem to just be a rephrasing, but who am I to question the reasoning for the change. Thanks for posting it though! God Bless
We need air pods then put ur hoodie and play this
I tried it it din't work -.-
hm im broke thats why im in church
hi
1,000000000????????
Thank you for posting. I find this very comforting just before bed
Thank you
god blis you god
......Had to memorize this in an hour or two...... HELP
.-.
sameeeee
Sam D Skaff omg
Same
Jim G. Why
Sam D Skaff did u pass the test
i love it..............................................
21:23
Who else goes to catechism because I need to learn this in one week🤦🏽♀️
I have to remember it in 3 hoursss!!!!
Also, how did you do on it?
Paula Meli Attard I passed but I still have to do other stuff
Paula Meli Attard I have to memorize this in the next 30 mins😭😭
I have to know this saurday
I made this video to be used as a memorization tool. It seems to have helped a lot of people. I'm a visual person, so scrolling text was a must, and the narration adds to storing it to memory. I used it to memorize the creed myself, and I find myself actually "hearing" the video when I've recited it since.
Kevin Hunter but its still not in my head
Thank you so much I had to memorize this for school and I was so stressed out because I didn’t know it.But this really helped me so much Thank You so much. (Kind comment)
Cool i memorize it🤩🤩
Have to memorize this in an hour
thank you so much for posting this, I always have to read it now, whereas before I could recite it. This was very very nice, thankyou! I like how you do a bit of everything ;)
If you find it fast, put the playback speed a t .075, it works for me, hope it helps.
Thanks this really help
i wish i cab memorize it but i cant
amen
I’ve got learn this in an hour GG Boys
Amém
I have to memorize this today for a test
Gaby Jensen same and my test is today at 9:30 and it's 9:20
Gaby Jensen same
Amen
No I do AMA
HELP I HAVE THE TEST TOMMOROW AND I HAVENT MEMORIZED IT IDK WHAT TO DO PLEASE PRAY FOR ME JM TERRUFUED
2:15
2:05
0:08
1:48
20:42
20:50
20:49
I do wish you spoke just slightly slower. This is wonderful at helping, but if it was a little slower it would give time to commit the words in my head, rather than just recite/read at the faster pace
Didi Ewing you can change the pace on any UA-cam video
See what I like about this is one thing. It's backed up by the Bible. It just utterly abolishes Mormonism and proves it to be a corrupt heresy like it is
10:00
I think this is the apostle's creed? The Nicene Creed that my teacher gave to me has different words to yours..
Nope. Definitely the New Nicene Creed. You sure they didn't give you an old copy?
No, this is the Apostles' Creed (It's a lot shorter than the Nicene Creed):
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into Hell. On the third day, He rose again from the dead. He ascended into Heaven, and is seated at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty. From there, He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting. Amen.
I believe in one God,
the Father almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all things visible and invisible.
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
the Only Begotten Son of God,
born of the Father before all ages.
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father;
through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven,
and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary,
and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered death and was buried,
and rose again on the third day
in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory
to judge the living and the dead
and his kingdom will have no end.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified,
who has spoken through the prophets.
I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church.
I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins
and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the world to come.
Amen.
Thank you kindly!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
hi
What about the filioque controversy? When it was introduced and why? As i understand, ti was not originally in the Nicene creed.
From Wikipedia: Filioque (Ecclesiastical Latin: [filiˈɔkwe]) is a Latin term added to the original Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed (commonly known as the Nicene Creed), and which has been the subject of great controversy between Eastern and Western Christianity. The Latin term Filioque describes the Holy Spirit in Christianity as proceeding from both the Father and the Son, (and not from the Father only). In the Nicene Creed it is translated by the English phrase "and [from] the Son":
I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceedeth from the Father ⟨and the Son⟩.
Who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified.
or in Latin:
Et in Spiritum Sanctum, Dominium et vivificantem:
qui ex Patre ⟨Filioque⟩ procedit
Qui cum Patre, et Filio simul adoratur. et cum glorificatur
Whether that term Filioque is included, as well as how it is translated and understood, can have important implications for how one understands the central Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. For some, the term implies a serious underestimation of the Father's role in the Trinity; for others, denial of what it expresses implies a serious underestimation of the role of the Son in the Trinity. Over time, the term became a symbol of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, although there have been attempts at resolving the conflict. Among the early attempts at harmonization are the works of Maximus the Confessor, who notably was canonised independently by both Eastern and Western churches.
The Filioque is included in the form of the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed used in most Western Christian churches, first appearing in the 6th century.[contradictory] It was accepted by the popes only in 1014 and is rejected by the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Churches and Church of the East. It is not in the original text of this Creed, attributed to the second ecumenical council, Constantinople I (381), which says that the Holy Spirit proceeds "from the Father", without additions of any kind, such as "and the Son" or "alone"] the Latin text now in use in most Western Churches speaks of the Holy Spirit as proceeding "from the Father and the Son".
Differences over this doctrine and the question of papal primacy have been and remain primary causes of schism between the Eastern Orthodox and Western churches. The term has been an ongoing source of conflict between Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, contributing, in major part, to the East-West Schism of 1054 and proving to be an obstacle to attempts to reunify the two sides.
Although the disagreement about the doctrine preceded the disagreement about the insertion into the creed, the two disagreements became linked to the third when the pope approved insertion of the term into the NCC in the 11th century. Siecienski writes that "Ultimately what was at stake was not only God's trinitarian nature, but also the nature of the Church, its teaching authority and the distribution of power among its leaders."
Hubert Cunliffe-Jones identifies two opposing Eastern Orthodox opinions about the Filioque: a "liberal" view and a "rigorist" view. The "liberal" view sees the controversy as being largely a matter of mutual miscommunication and misunderstanding. In this view, both East and West are at fault for failing to allow for a "plurality of theologies". Each side went astray in considering their theological framework as the only one that was doctrinally valid and applicable. Thus, neither side would accept that the dispute was not so much about conflicting dogmas as it was about different theologoumena or theological perspectives. While all Christians must be in agreement on questions of dogma, there is room for diversity in theological approaches.
However, this "liberal" view is vehemently opposed by those Eastern Orthodox whom Cunliffe-Jones identifies as holding a "rigorist" view. According to standard Eastern Orthodox position, as pronounced by Photius, Mark of Ephesus and 20th century Orthodox theologians such as Vladimir Lossky, the Filioque question hinges on fundamental issues of dogma and cannot be dismissed as simply one of different theologoumena. Many in the "rigorist" camp consider the Filioque to have resulted in the role of the Holy Spirit being underestimated by the Western Church and thus leading to serious doctrinal error.
In a similar vein, Siecienski comments that, although it was common in the 20th century to view the Filioque as just another weapon in the power struggle between Rome and Constantinople and although this was occasionally the case, for many involved in the dispute, the theological issues outweighed by far the ecclesiological concerns. According to Siecienski, the deeper question was perhaps whether Eastern and Western Christianity had wound up developing "differing and ultimately incompatible teachings about the nature of God". Moreover, Siecienski asserts that the question of whether the teachings of East and West were truly incompatible became almost secondary to the fact that, starting around the 8th or 9th century, Christians on both sides of the dispute began to believe that the differences were irreconcilable.
From the view of the West, the Eastern rejection of the Filioque denied the consubstantiality of the Father and the Son and was thus a form of crypto-Arianism. In the East, the interpolation of the Filioque seemed to many to be an indication that the West was teaching a "substantially different faith". Siecienski asserts that, as much as power and authority were central issues in the debate, the strength of emotion rising even to the level of hatred can be ascribed to a belief that the other side had "destroyed the purity of the faith and refused to accept the clear teachings of the fathers on the Spirit's procession"
There's a lot more information available online of you care to search further.
Kevin Hunter
I know what Wiki says, my question is why was it introduced at all? Originally it said that the Holy Spirit comes from the Father alone. Is it true that even some Roman bishops (the Popes) agreed with Arian "heretical" view of the Christ's nature centuries after Nicene council? Was that the reason the Western church introduced filioque term? To, so to speak, silence the opposition in their ranks?
Kevin Hunter
Would You please answer my question?
I do to
oh sahir!!!!!!!!!!@!!!!!!!@!@!!!!!!!!!!!!
hola
Oh St . Michael
im a kid that's our project
Are you working on memorizing the New Nicene Creed as a school project?
I have about 6 hours…..
Best be cracking on it!
À
It dont work
E i’M gEtTiNg My FiRsT cOmMuNiOn ThIs YeAr AnD i PAsSeD AlL mY PrAyErS aLrEaDy LmAo
HELP IM TERRIFIED I HAVE LESS THAN A DAY TO STUDY
Bruh u speak so fast
This is wrong
diego L why???
Go away #XFORRESPECT
No, it isn't. This is the Nicene Creed that's in accordance with the current/revised edition of the (i.e., The Third Edition) Roman Missal. This revision of the Roman Missal has been in effect since 2011, beginning with all Masses for the First Sunday of Advent (of course, including all Masses in anticipation of that Sunday).
@Drew Duffy If they're using the older version of the Nicene Creed (or any of the other parts in the Mass, for that matter), at Mass, then their Masses are illicit, at the very least.
this is worng
joshua marquez It's always funny when someone makes a comment without an explanation, and then spells the word "wrong" wrong. It seems you might have at least taken the time to write your sentence correctly. "This is worng" is just wrong on a number of levels. Lol
It is wrong because The Holy Spirit proceeds just from the Father. This mistake is called Filioque and has an Arian base.
Mr Yr stopmotion dude TV the bible is with mistakes dont forget that.
This is gr8 and your all wrong
Nope
15:08
3:39
0:41
0:10
0:10
1:04
2:38
3:37
20:40
3:41
3:49