Ricky Gervais And Stephen Colbert Go Head-To-Head On Religion REACTION!! 😳😂
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
- Ricky Gervais And Stephen Go Head-To-Head On Religion - • Ricky Gervais And Step...
MUSLIM RESPONSE TO RICKY GERVAIS ON RELIGION/ATHEISM
Pastor Mark Reacts: Science vs Religion (Ricky Gervais & Stephen Colbert)
Christopher Hitchens Brutal Four Minutes For Religion REACTION
#RickyGervais #Reaction #Comedy
the late show,stephen colbert,colbert,late show,talk show,the late late show,late late show,comedian,humor,celebrity,comedy,ricky gervais religion stephen colbert,ricky gervais religion,ricky gervais religion debate,ricky gervais stephen colbert religion reaction,ricky gervais reaction,pastor reactions,funny,biblical,skeptics,christianity,jesus,atheism,naturalist,science,religion,ricky gervais,faith
As Mark Twain said, "religion was created when the first con man met the first fool".
Nah man,that was Samuel Clemens.
Ricky is a favorite of mine. he has a way of explaining things in a good way. it cannot be denied.
You can deny just about anything. Nothing's easier than that. It's proving it wrong that's the hard bit.
@@khymaaren isn't that like saying, you can't prove god doesn't exist?
The claim is on the person who says he does.
@@jacklondon3355 You can't prove the existence of a supernatural being. You can't prove the opposite, either.
That's why those who make the claim that there is a god avoid this problem like fire.
I wouldn't so much call it a debate....Ricky was the only one who supported his own position with actually undeniable facts... Colbert just pushed his feelings then when Ricky backed him into a corner with facts he tried (and failed) to be funny
Colbert is a comedian, himself, but his tone aside, he did seem to be trying very hard to throw a wrench into Ricky's thinking and I think he was frustrated that he wasn't successful. I was surprised to learn that he is a believer, though.
You analyzing a bit too much. Colbert just challenged him and they both respected each other. It's just a show, mate
@@schwaiger1995 I was looking at his expressions and that's what I gathered. Analysing sounds way too professional.
Stephen is a proud Catholic but, thankfully, he’s a progressive too
@@danielcarter94 With all due respect, what does progressive mean in this context?
@@schwaiger1995Challenge is a strong word. "Tried" is more like it.
I absolutely love that each of them showed respect for the other’s opinion. That’s something that is in short supply in today’s world
That's the you're with some ppl suggesting he's offensive, they can't seem to differentiate his stand up from who he really is. Genuinely a decent bloke
If you guys want to react to some great atheist vs theist debates, react to anything involving Christopher Hitchens.
Nothing better than watching someone getting Hitchslapped!
100%
Hitchens got me out of religion
I always feel when colbert does this it's more about him trying to convince himself of his religion/god, rather than a genuine interest in a discussion.
Ricky is the living legend 🔥🔥🔥
“With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil - that takes religion.”
~Steven Weinberg
•
“Tantum religio posuit suadere malorum.”
(“To such heights of evil, are men driven by religion.”)
~Latin proverb
•
“A universe with god would have been a totally different kind of universe.
~Richard Dawkins
•
“In dark ages people are best guided by religion; as in a pitch black night a blind man is the best guide. He knows the roads and paths better than a man who can see. As daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind old men as guides.”
~Heinrich Heine
•
“The gods that we’ve made are exactly the kind of gods you’d expect to be made by a species that is about half a chromosome away from the chimpanzee.”
~Christopher Hitchens
•
“Is god willing to prevent evil but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able but not willing?
Then he is not benevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him god?”
~Epicurus
How anybody like Colbert can support the Catholic church is beyond me.
These 2 ladies who called themselves Garfunkel and Oates did a song called “The Loophole” you guys might want to check out for comedy purposes. Thank me later. The music video is priceless.
The audio spoils a great reaction video. There is 20% white noise (listen to it) there is your own audio (about 50%) and then there is the actual entertainment we are supposed to be watching and listening to ( about 30%). Have a rethink guys.
Remember when we all thought Colbert was intelligent?
It was a respectful disagreement i dont feel it was that awkward mostly because i watch a few debates 😂
Wish you can react on Jacque Fresco talks about the religion
Boom BABY !!!
Great vid guys! Great to see you enjoying some of our comediens from across the pond. I take it youv checked out Frankie Boyle 👍
Guys, recommend The Ricky Gervais Show: It's a goldmine of hilarious humor with the added bonus of meeting Karl Pilkington.
Didn't know he had a show!
@@thewatchden635 the ricky gervais shoe is basically the karl pilkington show and its the best thing you'll watch 🤣
Robin Williams stand up, you do reactions to him, I will subscribe
I can't stand the host's ignorance,it's too much!
Ignorance? He's letting Ricky speak and actually listens to his points and even agrees with his 1000 years point. This is one of the most chillest religion debates I've seen
"And then satan would be raping you!" Quite the way to end an discussion I must say Stephen is no where near the comedian Ricky is imo
Except for Qur'an, Qur'an already has 200 milion people that know it in totality so if every Qur'an, Bible or any other book would be destroyed in 100 or 1000 years only Qur'an would be same as today because people keep memorizing it in full, in many cases there are traditions of learning it from father to son and so on and on.
That's called oral tradition, many ancient society's practiced oral history and over time if it's not written then the stories will change and evolve each time it's told to the next generation until it's written down.
And then people remember it wrong, pass on the wrong information but claim it is true.
Another problem is language evolving over time, so the passed on information will change due to it.
I think mankind worshiped the sun originally, and it was known the sun brings life, and the sun is at its lowest point until Christmas day when it starts rising again, coincidence?
Lol
Too bad "jesus" was not born on the 25th.
Colbert has lost all my respect since he too over this show. He sucks now. Colbert Report was so funny, but since then he hasn't done anything I've enjoyed. He only makes me cringe, and I guess it was the writers on Colbert Report who was funny, not him. He was probably just reading other peoples words. So disappointing.
Science would come back the same way but have different naming conventions relative to the language they were rediscovered in.
A bit like ancient religion where they called things god like powers because some ruler had 'magic' when he really didn't. Some of it was just little discoveries that got lost.
Something had to start everything though.
If we ask 'how did this universe come to be' we get the idea that we're made by another universe, or split off from something else, but then that asks, where did THAT originate from? It's impossible for something to exist forever before itself, everything has an origin, what is the origin of the origins?
The first of all?
In that regard, that SOMETHING that was the first to exist, is God. We can't argue time travel either, you can't go back in time if you didn't originate to begin with.
But the idea of a man in the sky who judges your actions in life, is patently absurd and borders on insanity. Sky daddy isn't real. Unless we're a product of alien interference I suppose, then sky daddy is real in a different context.
My God simply is Origin. The First of All. It's not sentient. It's not aware. I don't even know or could guess what it is. Maybe it was a quantum particle, maybe it was an electron. I don't know. But that is Origin. I don't believe in afterlife or anything else.
I do to some degree believe in omnipotence and omniscience, because I have devised a way to make this possible for a single entity, albeit it would take a timespan that I couldn't even write down and we would be nearing the end of the universal cycle by the time we managed it, give or take a few trillion years. If we could come up with wormhole technology or something similar, it would lessen the timespan required for my plan to initiate godhood but still, it's essentially impossible for the created God at the end of it to survive the universal recycling process (all matter and energy condenses into a single point before exploding with renewed vigour and the new cycle begins) and come out the other side without being destroyed by the explosion.
That's a very wierd way to define origin, it seems your a deist of some kind. Which fair enough but why use such a vague term as God? It makes you seem like a theist
Its also okay to not know