YAHOO I GOT D! E and C are clearly irrelevant. B and A are probably true, but we are looking for an implicit argument made in the connection from the premise to the conclusion and A/B fails to do that by wholly ignoring taxes.
In option C for negating cant we negate in a manner-->> If income taxes are -- lowered consumer wages will decline even further. Then the negated version definitely weakens the argument as per If then condition.
but ifr you negate answer choice c then it will read if you lower income tax, consumer wages will not decrease ? the only thing i could think of is that it will either remain the same or increase but we need it to officially increase?
I'm fairly less reluctant not to believe the average specific person will focus broadly thru between the curvy planes of what these questions standardly expect generally in no specific time on average of 1.5min per question.
@@noBADGolf i think what he was trying to get at is that the reason why he took 8 minutes to do this was to show his thought process visually for others to learn. If he was doing it by himself his thought process would allow him to do this problem in a minute or so since he does not have to explain or put into words.
![Tips for Sufficient Assumption Questions [LSAT Logical Reasoning]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KtA7nXgXuTY/mqdefault.jpg)
This is a super good break down, I just need to be able to do this within the time limit
Did u study law?
Thanks for all the team for those videos!
I got this one correct as well. 😊
Yes that is true trying not to rush in the reading
I really wish all these videos were in ORDER. its so hard to stay on track!
YAHOO I GOT D! E and C are clearly irrelevant. B and A are probably true, but we are looking for an implicit argument made in the connection from the premise to the conclusion and A/B fails to do that by wholly ignoring taxes.
Took me less than a minute, easy
Same, this whole video was so unnecessarily long.
In option C for negating cant we negate in a manner-->> If income taxes are -- lowered consumer wages will decline even further. Then the negated version definitely weakens the argument as per If then condition.
tysm❤
D is correct
but ifr you negate answer choice c then it will read if you lower income tax, consumer wages will not decrease ? the only thing i could think of is that it will either remain the same or increase but we need it to officially increase?
It says “if they are not lowered” not if they are lowered
I'm fairly less reluctant not to believe the average specific person will focus broadly thru between the curvy planes of what these questions standardly expect generally in no specific time on average of 1.5min per question.
Nice Work !!!!!
man I'm pretty good at these. does that mean that I will do good on the lsat?
How did you do bro?
nothing like taking about 8 minutes to answer a question we have to answer in around a minute
Exactly where I struggle
What an unbelievably dense comment
@@cadmus204 thanks! since you are so smart what did you get on the LSAT?
will you teach me how to be so smart Jonathan?
@@noBADGolf i think what he was trying to get at is that the reason why he took 8 minutes to do this was to show his thought process visually for others to learn. If he was doing it by himself his thought process would allow him to do this problem in a minute or so since he does not have to explain or put into words.